目的:口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)在患者护理中至关重要,通过牙科患者报告的结果(dPROs)反映口腔健康。本系统评价旨在概述OHRQoL在牙科卫生和/或牙科治疗提供者常规治疗的患者人群中的4维(4-D)影响。因为这些口腔保健专业人员的文献有限。
方法:本研究提取并分析了OHRQoL的特征和多维影响,使用口腔健康影响概况(OHIP)作为主要牙科患者报告的结果指标(dPROM)。搜索策略跨越7个数据库:Medline通过Ovid界面(OvidMEDLINE(R)ALL),Embase通过Ovid,Cinahl,APAPsycINFO通过Ovid,牙科和口腔科学搜索,Scopus,和WebofScience(核心收藏)。它始于2022年9月2日,并于2023年7月5日进行了细化搜索。英语标准在删除重复后产生了645篇文章。涉及3名审稿人的筛选程序包含标题,abstract,和全文回顾。
结果:应用纳入和排除标准后,5篇文章进行了数据提取,捕获特定领域的信息,包括基线和随访OHRQoL数据。另外一组包含OHRQoL汇总数据的13篇文章进行了单独分析。JoannaBriggsInstitute(JBI)的关键评估工具用于对所包含的文章进行风险偏差评估。基线OHRQoL数据报告的4-D影响评分,口腔功能的范围为3.10至4.20,0.84-2.70用于面部疼痛,面部外观1.70-4.50,心理社会影响为0.44-2.50。在OHRQoL的后续数据中,口腔功能的范围为1.52-3.60,口腔疼痛为0.60-2.10,口腔外观为0.91-2.25,心理社会影响为0.10-0.60。
结论:这篇综述强调了对口腔卫生和牙科治疗患者人群OHRQoL数据收集标准化的关键呼吁,因为只有26%的预定不同人群完成了OHRQoL对4-D影响的研究。此外,在描述由这些提供者常规治疗的患者的多维影响方面存在有限的研究,这表明了在该领域进行实质性研究的紧迫性。
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) is pivotal in patient care, reflecting oral health through dental patient-reported outcomes (dPROs). This systematic review aims to outline the 4-dimensional (4-D) impact of OHRQoL within patient populations routinely treated by dental hygiene and/or dental therapy providers, as there is limited literature present for these oral health care professionals.
The study extracted and analyzed characteristics and multidimensional impact of OHRQoL, using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) as the primary dental patient-reported outcome measure (dPROM). The search strategy spanned 7 databases: Medline via the Ovid interface (Ovid MEDLINE(R) ALL), Embase via Ovid, Cinahl, APA PsycINFO via Ovid, Dentistry and Oral Sciences Search, Scopus, and Web of Science (Core Collection). It commenced September 2, 2022, with a refinement search on July 5, 2023. English language criteria yielded 645 articles postduplication removal. A screening procedure involving 3 reviewers encompassed title, abstract, and full-text review.
After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 5 articles were subjected to data extraction, capturing domain-specific information including baseline and follow-up OHRQoL data. An additional set of 13 articles containing summarized OHRQoL data underwent separate analysis. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools were utilized for risk bias assessment of the included articles. The 4-D impact scores reported for baseline OHRQoL data, ranged from 3.10 to 4.20 for Oral Function, 0.84-2.70 for Orofacial Pain, 1.70-4.50 for Orofacial Appearance, and 0.44-2.50 for Psychosocial Impact. In follow-up OHRQoL data, the range for Oral Function was 1.52-3.60, Orofacial Pain 0.60-2.10, Orofacial Appearance 0.91-2.25, and Psychosocial Impact 0.10-0.60.
This review highlights a critical call for standardization in OHRQoL data collection for dental hygiene and dental therapy patient populations as only 26% of the predetermined distinct populations were found to have studies completed with 4-D impact of OHRQoL. Moreover, the presence of limited research in describing the multi-dimensional impact in patients routinely treated by these providers shows the urgency of substantive research in this area.