BACKGROUND: This case report outlines a novel prosthodontic approach for managing a broken screw inside an implant screw channel, emphasising the importance of innovative solutions in implant dentistry.
METHODS: A 57-year-old male patient sought restoration for implant-supported crowns (#46 and #47). A broken screw inside the implant screw channel posed a significant concern for both the patient and the dental team.
METHODS: Utilising an impression pickup technique of the inner surface of the implant body, a custom titanium abutment was fabricated in the laboratory and restoration was successfully replaced. A follow-up of 6 months was performed, ensuring optimal function and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: The custom titanium abutment with a zirconia crown was placed, leading to a successful restoration. The patient reported no discomfort, demonstrating improved function and aesthetics.
UNASSIGNED: This case highlights the effectiveness of tailored prosthodontic interventions in addressing complex implant-related complications.

Glass ceramics are widely used to manufacture esthetic veneers, inlays, onlays, and crowns. Although the clinical survival rates ofglass-ceramic restorations arefavorable,fractures or chips are common. Certain cases can be repaired with direct composite.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the interaction effect of different designs and surface treatments on the load-to-failure of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic repaired with nanofilled composite.
METHODS: Lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic slabs (IPS e.max Press, Ivoclar Vivadent) with three different designs of the top surface (flat, single plateau, or doubleplateau) (n=U) received \'no treatment\', \'5% HF etching\', or \"AI2O3 sandblasting\". HF-etched and sandblasted slabs also received silane and universal one-step adhesive application. All slabs were incrementally repaired with nanofilled composite (Filtek Z350, 3M ESPE) up to6 mm above the highest ceramic top plateau. Specimens were stored in artificial saliva at 37 °C for 21 days and then subjected to 1,000 thermocycles between 5 and 55 °C. The interface composite-ceramic of each specimen was tensile tested until failure in a universal testing machine and the mode of failure was determined under a stereomicroscope. The ceramic surface morphology of one representative tested specimen from each subgroup (design/surface treatment) was observed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
RESULTS: Regardless of ceramic design, the absence of surface treatment resulted in significantly lower load-to-failure values. No significant differences in load-to-failure values were observed between HF-etched and sandblasted specimens for the flat design; however, HF etching resulted in significantly higher load-to-failure values than sandblasting for both single plateau and double plateau designs. The majority (60%) of HF-etched specimens with single plateau or double plateau presented mixed failures. SEM photomicrographs showed that HF-etched specimens had smoother surfaces than sandblasted specimens.
CONCLUSIONS: The surface treatment of a defective lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restoration has more influence than its macroscopic design on the retention of the composite repair. HF etching seems to provide higher bond strength to the composite repair.
Embora fraturas e lascamento de restauragoes vitrocerámicas sejam comuns, alguns casos podem ser reparados com compósito direto.
OBJECTIVE: investigar o efeito da interagao de diferentes formas e tratamentos de superficie na carga de ruptura de uma vitrocerámica reforgada com dissilicato de litio reparada com compósito nanoparticulado.
UNASSIGNED: A superficie superior de espécimes de vitroceramica (IPS e.max Press, Ivoclar Vivadent) foi preparada com tres formas (plana, plato único, ou duplo) e recebeu (n=11): ‘nenhum tratamento’, ‘condicionamento com ácido hidrofluoridrico 5%’, ou ‘jateamento com AfOf. Ambos espécimes condicionados e jateados receberam silano e adesivo universal. Todos os espécimes foram reparados incrementalmente com compósito (Filtek Z350, 3M ESPE) até6 mm acima do plato cerámico mais alto, armazenados em saliva artificial á 37 °C por 21 dias, e submetidos á 1.000 termociclos (5 e 55 °C). A interface compósito-cerámica de cada amostra foi testada á tragao até sua falha em máquina universal e o modo de falha foi determinado com estereomicroscópio. A morfologia da superficie de uma amostra representativa de forma/tratamento de superficie foi observada através de microscopia eletronica de varredura (MEV).
RESULTS: Independentemente da forma ceramica, a ausencia de tratamento superficial resultou em valores de carga de ruptura significativamente menores. Nao foi observada differenga significativa entre os espécimes planos condicionados ou jateados; no entanto, o condicionamento resultou em valores significativamente maiores que o jateamento para espécimes com plato único e duplo. A maioria (60%) dos espécimes condicionados e com plato único ou duplo apresentou falhas mistas. Imagens SEM demonstraram rugosidade superficial mais regular dos espécimes condicionados que os jateados.
UNASSIGNED: O tratamento superficial de uma restauragao defeituosa de vitrocerámica reforgada por dissilicato de litio tem maior influencia na retengao do reparo de compósito do que sua forma macroscópica; ainda, o condicionamento com ácido hidrofluoridrico parece proporcionar maior resistencia de uniao ao reparo com compósito.

This study evaluated the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with a new self-adhesive composite hybrid material (Surefil one [SO]) using different protocols. A total of 72 maxillary premolars were divided into 6 groups (n = 12). The control group included intact teeth, and the other 5 groups included teeth in which disto-occlusal cavities were prepared and endodontic treatment was performed. The prepared cavities were assigned to groups that were based on the restorative procedures: bulk-fill group, universal adhesive plus conventional bulk-fill composite resin plus a layer of conventional composite resin; SO-SC group, self-cured SO; SO-LC group, light-cured SO; SO-UA group, universal adhesive plus SO; or SO-core group, a 4.0-mm layer of SO covered by a layer of conventional composite resin. Specimens in each group underwent thermocycling and load cycling to test the fracture strength and fracture mode. The results were analyzed using analysis of variance and the Tukey test (α = 0.05). The SO-core group showed the highest mean (SD) fracture resistance, 959.9 (171.8) N, among the restored groups. The SO-core group did not differ significantly from the control group (P > 0.05) but did show significantly higher strength than all other test groups (P < 0.05) except SO-SC (P = 0.364). No significant differences were found between the bulk-fill, SO-SC, SO-LC, and SO-UA groups (P > 0.05). The SO-core group showed the highest number of unrestorable fractures, while the main fracture mode for the other groups was restorable fracture. Although the use of SO as a core material restored the fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars to the level of intact teeth, it also resulted in a higher incidence of unrestorable fractures. The SO-SC group demonstrated a high fracture resistance comparable to that of the SO-core group and had a greater tendency to experience restorable fractures.

暂无摘要。

The aim the study. Analyze errors in planning orthopedic treatment using dental implants using the example of clinical cases.
METHODS: Two patients are presented who applied for a consultation at the orthopedic and surgical department of the Federal State Budgetary Institution National Medical Research Center Central Research Institute of Chronic and Peripheral Surgery of the Russian Ministry of Health regarding a fracture of a previously installed orthopedic structure on an implant. For diagnostic purposes, computed tomography was performed to determine the condition of the implants and teeth of the upper and lower jaws.
RESULTS: The patients were found to have: a fracture of an implant 4.0*10 with a single orthopedic structure in the area of tooth 4.6 (the patient did not undergo restoration of the missing tooth 4.7 in the presence of an antagonist), a fracture of small diameter implants (3.5*9) in the area of 3.6, 3.7, prosthetic combined orthopedic crowns.
CONCLUSIONS: During surgical and orthopedic treatment of patients, it is necessary to strictly follow the instructions developed by the manufacturer of dental implants and the STaR recommendations.
UNASSIGNED: Разбор ошибок планирования ортопедического лечения с применением дентальных имплантатов на примере клинических случаев.
UNASSIGNED: Представлены два клинических случая лечения пациентов, обратившихся на консультацию в ортопедическое и хирургическое отделение ФГБУ НМИЦ «ЦНИИС и ЧЛХ» Минздрава России по поводу перелома ранее установленной на дентальный имплантат ортопедической конструкции. С диагностической целью для определения состояния имплантатов и зубов верхней и нижней челюсти проводили компьютерную томографию.
UNASSIGNED: У пациентов выявлены перелом имплантата 4,0×10 мм с одиночной ортопедической конструкцией в области зуба 4.6 (восстановление отсутствующего зуба 4.7 при наличии антагониста пациенту не проводилось), перелом имплантатов малого диаметра (3,5×9 мм) в области 3.6, 3.7, протезированных объединенными ортопедическими коронками.
UNASSIGNED: При хирургическом и ортопедическом лечении пациентов необходимо строго соблюдать инструкции, разработанные изготовителем дентальных имплантатов и рекомендации Стоматологической ассоциации России (СтАР).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of two resin composites (with different viscosities) and the elevation amount on fracture strength and fracture behavior of molars with and without deep margin elevations (DME).
METHODS: 70 extracted, caries-free human molars were selected. All teeth were prepared as MOD onlay cavities with a margin 2 mm below the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) on the mesial and buccal sides and 2 mm above the CEJ on the distal side. The teeth were divided into two groups according to the type of resin composite used in margin elevation, elevated with flowable composite (Universal Flo) or condensable composite (G-Aenial Posterior). These two groups were further subdivided into subgroups in which the elevation was 2, 3, or 4 mm, and a control group in which the non-elevated indirect restoration was directly bonded to the subgingival margin, making a total of seven groups (n= 10). After elevations, the restorations were completed using a nanoceramic CAD-CAM block (Cerasmart A3 HT) and as adhesive cement, G-Cem Link Force. Static force was applied to the restored teeth using a universal testing machine at an angle of 15° until fracture occurred. Fracture strength values were recorded, and fracture types were examined under 6x magnification. One-way ANOVA was carried out to determine the effect of DME on the fracture strength. A two-way ANOVA was conducted to investigate main and interaction effects of the material type used in the elevation and the amount of elevation made on the fracture strength (P< 0.05).
RESULTS: Using flowable or condensable composite as elevation material did not affect the fracture strength of CAD-CAM restorations. Flowable and condensable composites of 2, 3, or 4 mm did not significantly affect fracture strength values for either material. Specimen margins with and without elevation exhibited similar fracture strength values. The type of material used in the elevation and the amount did not affect the fracture strength of teeth.
CONCLUSIONS: The deep margin elevation technique for teeth with carious lesions extending subgingivally, may be useful in routine practice.

Severe tooth wear is related to substantial loss of tooth structure, with dentin exposure and significant loss (≥1/3) of the clinical crown. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize and analyze the scientific evidence regarding the mechanical performance of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) composite resin and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic occlusal veneers, in terms of fatigue and fracture resistance, on severely worn posterior teeth. Currently, occlusal veneers are an alternative for treating worn posterior teeth. Although scientific evidence demonstrates the good performance of lithium disilicate occlusal veneers, there are less brittle materials with a modulus of elasticity more similar to dentin than ceramics, such as resin CAD/CAM blocks. Therefore, it is important to identify which type of material is best for restoring teeth with occlusal wear defects and which material can provide better clinical performance. This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, OpenGrey, Redalyc, DSpace, and Grey Literature Report databases was conducted and supplemented by a manual search, with no time or language limitations, until January 2022. We aimed to identify studies evaluating the fatigue and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic occlusal veneers. The quality of the full-text articles was evaluated according to the modified Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) criteria for in vitro studies, and 400 articles were initially identified. After removing duplicates and applying the selection criteria, 6 studies were included in the review. The results demonstrated that the mechanical performance of CAD/CAM composite resin occlusal veneers is comparable to that of CAD/CAM lithium disilicate occlusal veneers in terms of fatigue and fracture resistance.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and radiographic performance and survival rate of a new two-piece ceramic implant system after at least 12 months of follow-up.
METHODS: Sixty-five implants were placed and followed up for at least 12 months (12.3 ± 1.5), in 50 patients. The implants were installed both in fresh extraction sockets and in healed sites and received provisional restoration when the clinical insertion torque was greater than 35Ncm. The primary results describe the survival rate of these implants. Clinical performance was evaluated through the evaluation of the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) and the degree of satisfaction of the patients. Bone loss was measured through radiographic measurements of the marginal bone loss in the mesial (MBLM) and distal (MBLD) sites.
RESULTS: The survival rate was 98.5%. The average MBLM was 0.24 mm (± 0.53) and the MBLD was 0.27 mm (± 0.57). A statistical difference was observed only when comparing immediate implants with delayed ones (MBLM - p = 0.046 and MBLD - p = 0.028) and when they received immediate provisionalization or not (MBLM - p = 0.009 and MBLD - p = 0.040). The PES before the intervention (T0) was 13.4 (± 0.8) and the PES at T2 (12-month follow-up) was 12.9 (± 1.5) (p = 1.14).
CONCLUSIONS: The new two-piece ceramic implant used in the present study showed predictable and reliable results, similar to those found with titanium implants after one year of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: These implants can be used as an alternative to titanium implants in terms of the marginal bone loss and the degree of patient satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: The stability of the abutment screw is pivotal for successful implant-supported restorations, yet screw loosening remains a common complication, leading to compromised function and potential implant failure. This study aims to evaluate the effect of different implant-abutment types and heights on screw loosening in cases with increased crown height space (CHS).
METHODS: In this in vitro study, a total of 64 abutments in eight distinct groups based on their type and height were evaluated. These groups included stock, cast, and milled abutments with heights of 4 mm (groups S4, C4, and M4), 7 mm (groups S7, C7, and M7), and 10 mm (groups C10 and M10). Removal torque loss (RTL) was assessed both before and after subjecting the abutments to dynamic cyclic loading. Additionally, the differences between initial RTL and RTL following cyclic loading were analyzed for each group (p < .05).
RESULTS: The C10 group demonstrated the highest RTL, whereas the S4 group exhibited the lowest initial RTL percentage (p < .05). Furthermore, the study established significant variations in RTL percentages and the discrepancies between initial and postcyclic loading RTL across different abutment groups (p < .05). Additionally, both abutment types and heights were found to significantly influence the RTL percentage (p < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The type and height of the implant abutment affected screw loosening, and in an increased CHS of 12 mm, using a stock abutment with a postheight of 4 mm can be effective in minimizing screw loosening.

BACKGROUND: An optimum restoration for reconstructing endodontically treated teeth should provide excellent marginal adaptation, high fracture resistance as well as maximum tooth structure conservation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the marginal adaptation and fatigue resistance of different coronal restorations in endodontically treated premolars.
METHODS: Thirty sound maxillary first premolars were endodontically treated and received MOD cavities. Teeth were randomly allocated into three groups (n = 10) according to the type of coronal restoration: Group R: polyethylene fibers (ribbond), fibers-reinforced composite (everX posterior) and final layer of nano-hybrid composite. Group O: indirect lithium disilicate overlay and Group C: fiber-post, resin composite restoration, and lithium disilicate crown. Marginal gap assessment was performed before and after thermocycling (5000 cycles) using stereomicroscope. Samples were subjected to stepwise-stress loading starting at 200 N, and increased by 100 N in each step until failure occurred. Statistical analysis was done by One-way ANOVA followed Tukey`s Post Hoc test for multiple comparison. Paired t test was used to compare the marginal adaptation before and after thermocycling. Survival probability was evaluated by Life table survival analysis. Failure mode analysis was performed with Chi-square test.
RESULTS: Marginal gap was significantly the lowest in group R (37.49 ± 5.05) and (42.68 ± 2.38), while being the highest in group C (59.78 ± 5.67) and (71.52 ± 5.18) in before and after thermocycling respectively (P < 0.0001). Fatigue resistance was the highest for group O (1310.8 ± 196.7), and the lowest for group R (905.4 ± 170.51) with a significant difference between groups (P < 0.0001). Crown group had the highest percentage (80%) of catastrophic failure, while, overlay group exhibited the lowest (20%).
CONCLUSIONS: Direct restoration without cuspal coverage using ribbon fibers with short FRC provided better marginal adaptation than indirect overlays and crowns, but fatigue resistance wasn\'t significantly improved. Adhesive ceramic overlays showed the best fatigue performance and the least catastrophic failure rate compared to both direct fiber-reinforced composite and indirect ceramic full coverage restorations.
CONCLUSIONS: Indirect adhesive overlays are a suitable, more conservative restorative option for endodontically treated teeth than full coverage restorations, especially when tooth structure is severely compromised.