%0 Journal Article
%T Clinical and radiographic outcomes of a two-piece ceramic implant: one year results from a prospective clinical trial.
%A da Silva AMP
%A Horta Dos Santos FA
%A Mota RF
%A Teixeira MKS
%A Telles DM
%A Lourenço EJV
%J Clin Oral Investig
%V 28
%N 7
%D 2024 Jun 18
%M 38886209
%F 3.606
%R 10.1007/s00784-024-05783-3
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>To describe the clinical and radiographic performance and survival rate of a new two-piece ceramic implant system after at least 12 months of follow-up.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Sixty-five implants were placed and followed up for at least 12 months (12.3 ± 1.5), in 50 patients. The implants were installed both in fresh extraction sockets and in healed sites and received provisional restoration when the clinical insertion torque was greater than 35Ncm. The primary results describe the survival rate of these implants. Clinical performance was evaluated through the evaluation of the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) and the degree of satisfaction of the patients. Bone loss was measured through radiographic measurements of the marginal bone loss in the mesial (MBLM) and distal (MBLD) sites.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The survival rate was 98.5%. The average MBLM was 0.24 mm (± 0.53) and the MBLD was 0.27 mm (± 0.57). A statistical difference was observed only when comparing immediate implants with delayed ones (MBLM - p = 0.046 and MBLD - p = 0.028) and when they received immediate provisionalization or not (MBLM - p = 0.009 and MBLD - p = 0.040). The PES before the intervention (T0) was 13.4 (± 0.8) and the PES at T2 (12-month follow-up) was 12.9 (± 1.5) (p = 1.14).<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>The new two-piece ceramic implant used in the present study showed predictable and reliable results, similar to those found with titanium implants after one year of follow-up.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>These implants can be used as an alternative to titanium implants in terms of the marginal bone loss and the degree of patient satisfaction.