Daily dose

日剂量
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:展示了一个框架,用于计算质子治疗的日剂量分布,该框架适用于使用RailsCT进行在线评估的时间范围。
    方法:与日剂量计算相关的任务是完全自动化的。每日和计划图像之间的刚性配准用于传播光束和目标以计算每日剂量;此外,使用可变形配准来传播风险结构,以促进在线评估。使用包含模拟目标和膀胱轮廓的骨盆体模进行端到端恒定测试。处理了与10名临床患者相关的97个每日扇形束CT数据集,以证明在线评估的可行性和实用性。报告计算时间和剂量测定差异。
    结果:体模恒定性测试需要62秒才能完成,注册或计算剂量没有明显差异。在初始和重复扫描中,目标和膀胱轮廓的最大剂量相同(分别为359和310cGy(RBE))。每天97张患者图像的总处理时间平均为154.6s(73.0-222.0s;SD=31.8s)。平均而言,剂量计算占总处理时间的35%。目标轮廓的D95平均差异为1.5%(SD=1.6%),在单个每日图像上最大减少5.9%。
    结论:每日剂量可以在一个时间范围内自动计算,可使用扫描仪实用程序结合商业治疗计划系统的脚本API进行在线评估。质子治疗中剂量的在线评估有助于检测临床相关变化,指南设置,并促进治疗或重新规划决策。
    OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a framework for calculating daily dose distributions for proton therapy in a timeframe amenable to online evaluation using CT-on-Rails.
    METHODS: Tasks associated with calculation of daily dose are fully automated. A rigid registration between daily and planning images is used to propagate beams and targets for calculation of daily dose; additionally, risk structures are propagated using deformable registration to facilitate online evaluation. An end-to-end constancy test was carried out using a pelvis phantom containing a simulated target and bladder contour. 97 Daily fan-beam CT data sets associated with 10 clinical patients were processed to demonstrate feasibility and utility of online evaluation. Computing times and dosimetric differences are reported.
    RESULTS: The phantom constancy test took 62 s to complete with no notable discrepancies in the registrations or calculated dose. Max doses were identical for target and bladder contours on initial and repeat scans (359 and 310 cGy (RBE) respectively). Total processing time for 97 daily patient images averaged 154.6 s (73.0 - 222.0 s; SD = 31.8 s). On average, dose calculation accounted for 35 % of total processing time. Average differences in D95 for target contours was 1.5 % (SD = 1.6 %) with a max decrease of 5.9 % on a single daily image.
    CONCLUSIONS: Daily dose can be automatically calculated in a timeframe amenable to online evaluation using scanner utilities in conjunction with the scripting API of a commercial treatment planning system. Online evaluation of dose in proton therapy is useful to detect clinically relevant changes, guide setup, and facilitate treatment or replanning decisions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:芬戈莫德被批准用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS),推荐剂量为每天0.5mg。为了解决可能的不良事件,一些临床医生可能会减少芬戈莫德的剂量,主要是隔日形式。我们系统地回顾了这种方法的疗效测量文献。方法:PubMed(Medline®),WebofScience,Embase,Scopus,和Cochrane图书馆数据库被搜索到2021年4月9日。临床研究(病例报告和病例系列除外)在英语中,包括在内。然后,关于交替剂量芬戈莫德的出版物(包括每隔一天,每两三天)选择一次。排除那些关于减少日剂量(任何日剂量小于0.5mg/天)的研究,以关注替代给药。结果:纳入4项观察性研究。Ohtani等人的数据。研究有限。根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表,其他三项研究质量良好。将总共296名标准剂量患者与276名替代剂量患者进行比较。转换为替代剂量的最常见原因是淋巴细胞减少,其次是肝酶升高。两项研究得出结论,交替给药可能是安全的,然而,对于每日剂量不可耐受的不良反应患者的有效策略。然而,Zecca等人。警告疾病重新激活的可能性很高。由于研究结果指标的差异,荟萃分析不适用。结论:本系统评价强调了芬戈莫德替代给药的安全性和有效性的证据的模糊性。鼓励对该主题进行进一步研究。
    Background: Fingolimod is approved in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) with the recommended dose of 0.5 mg daily. To tackle possible adverse events, some clinicians may reduce the dose of fingolimod, mainly in the alternate-day form. We systematically reviewed the literature for efficacy measures of this method. Methods: PubMed (Medline®), Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched until April 9, 2021. Clinical studies (other than case reports and case series), in English, were included. Then, publications concerning alternate dose fingolimod (including every other day, every two or three days) were selected. Those studies concerning reduced daily dose (any daily dose less than 0.5 mg/day) were excluded to focus on alternate dosing. Results: Four observational studies were included. Data on Ohtani et al. study were limited. Three other studies were of good quality based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A total of 296 patients on the standard dose were compared to 276 patients on the alternate dosage. The most common reason for switching to the alternate dose was lymphopenia, followed by elevated liver enzymes. Two studies concluded that the alternate dosing could be a safe, yet effective strategy in patients with intolerable adverse effects of daily dose. However, Zecca et al. warned about the high possibility of disease reactivation. Due to the differences in outcome measures of the studies, meta-analysis was not applicable. Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the ambiguity of evidence on safety and efficacy of alternate dosing of fingolimod, encouraging further research on the subject.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:氯氮平是治疗耐药性精神分裂症的最有效药物,氯氮平治疗精神疾病的剂量和浓度在不同人群中差异很大,受多种因素影响。
    方法:检测3734例精神病患者的血清氯氮平浓度,以及每日剂量的数据,性别,收集年龄和其他医疗记录进行统计分析.
    结果:平均日剂量,氯氮平的平均血清浓度和平均C/D(浓度/剂量)比率为191.02±113.47mg/天,326.15±235.66ng/mL和1.94±1.25ng/mL/mg/天,分别。男女之间的日剂量有差异,女性的日剂量较高(p<0.01),较高的血清氯氮平浓度(p<0.01)和较高的C/D比(p<0.01)。日剂量存在显着差异(p<0.001),不同年龄组的血清药物浓度(p<0.001)和C/D比值(p<0.001)。日剂量随着年龄的增长而减少(p为趋势<0.001),C/D比值随年龄增长而增加(p为趋势<0.001)。住院患者和门诊患者的日剂量没有差异,但是住院患者的血清浓度(p<0.001)和C/D比(p<0.001)更高。不同职业的日剂量没有差异,但血清浓度(p<0.001)和C/D比(p<0.001)存在显着差异,和失业患者可能有更高的血清浓度和C/D比。疾病持续时间,合并症,婚姻状况,和精神病类型可能会影响每日剂量和血清浓度。
    结论:研究区域中氯氮平的有效日剂量和血清浓度可能低于推荐水平,和女性有较高的血清浓度和较慢的代谢率。随着年龄的增长,每日剂量减少,代谢率减慢。住院状态和患者职业可能影响氯氮平的血清浓度和代谢率。
    Clozapine is the most effective drug for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, and the dosage and concentration of clozapine in the treatment of mental illness vary greatly in different populations and are affected by many factors.
    The serum clozapine concentration of 3734 psychiatric patients was detected, and data on daily dose, sex, age and other medical records were collected for statistical analysis.
    The mean daily dose, mean serum concentration and mean C/D (concentration/dose) ratio of clozapine were 191.02 ± 113.47 mg/day, 326.15 ± 235.66 ng/mL and 1.94 ± 1.25 ng/mL per mg/day, respectively. There was difference in daily dose between sexes, and females had higher daily dose (p <0.01), higher serum clozapine concentrations (p < 0.01) and higher C/D ratios (p < 0.01). There were significant differences in daily dose (p < 0.001), serum drug concentration (p < 0.001) and C/D ratio (p < 0.001) among different age groups. The daily dose decreased with age (p for trend < 0.001), and the C/D ratio increased with age (p for trend < 0.001). Inpatients and outpatients had no difference in daily dose, but inpatients had higher serum concentration (p < 0.001) and C/D ratio (p < 0.001). There was no difference in daily dose among different occupations, but there were significant differences in serum concentration (p < 0.001) and C/D ratio (p < 0.001), and unemployed patients may have higher serum concentration and C/D ratio. Duration of disease, comorbidity, marital status, and psychotic type may influence the daily dose and serum concentration.
    The effective daily dose and serum concentration of clozapine in the study area may be lower than recommended levels, and women have higher serum concentrations and slower metabolic rates. With increasing age, the daily dose decreases, and the metabolic rate slows. Inpatient status and occupation of patients may influence the serum concentration and metabolic rate of clozapine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全球,侵袭性念珠菌病的主要原因和医院获得性感染的第四大原因是念珠菌属(spp.)组。对抗这种耐药真菌的最重要工具之一是适当使用抗真菌剂。
    该研究旨在确定棘白菌素的一般处方模式以及它们与治疗期的关系。
    定量的,观察,使用了描述性的,包括在豪登省一家私立医院接受抗真菌治疗的患者,2015年1月1日至2015年12月31日之间的南非。
    在包含的146份患者档案中,102例患者(69.9%)接受了卡泊芬净治疗,44例患者(30.1%)接受了anidulafungin治疗。对于前者,99(97.1%)患者接受了70mg的负荷剂量(LD),而200mganidulafungin仅用于30例患者(68.2%)。根据维持剂量指南,大多数(98.1%)卡泊芬净治疗的患者每天接受50毫克静脉注射,而4例(3.9%)患者接受了较高剂量(每天70mg)的治疗。Anidulafungin以各种维持剂量给药,包括400毫克(2.3%的患者),200毫克(52.3%),每天静脉注射100毫克(43.2%)和50毫克(2.3%)。
    我们的结果可用于产生针对念珠菌感染患者的医院特定算法。
    这些发现有助于我们理解抗真菌剂的处方模式及其对治疗念珠菌的影响。感染。
    UNASSIGNED: Worldwide, the leading cause of invasive candidiasis and the fourth leading cause of hospital-acquired infections are the Candida species (spp.) group. One of the most important tools in fighting such drug-resistant fungi is the appropriate use of antifungal agents.
    UNASSIGNED: The study aimed to determine echinocandins\' general prescribing patterns and how they are associated with the treatment period.
    UNASSIGNED: A quantitative, observational, and descriptive was used, and included patients receiving antifungal treatment in a private hospital in Gauteng, South Africa between 01 January 2015 to 31 December 2015.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 146 patient files included, 102 patients (69.9%) received caspofungin and 44 patients (30.1%) were treated with anidulafungin. For the former, 99 (97.1%) patients received a loading dose (LD) of 70 mg, while 200 mg anidulafungin was only prescribed to 30 patients (68.2%). In line with maintenance dose guidelines, the majority (98.1%) of caspofungin-treated patients received 50 mg IV daily, whereas 4 (3.9%) patients were treated at higher doses (70 mg daily). Anidulafungin was administered at various maintenance doses, including 400 mg (2.3% of patients), 200 mg (52.3%), 100 mg (43.2%) and 50 mg (2.3%) IV daily.
    UNASSIGNED: Our results can be utilised to produce a hospital-specific algorithm in terms of Candida-infected patients.
    UNASSIGNED: These findings contribute to our understanding of prescribing patterns of antifungal agents and the impact thereof on treating Candida spp. Infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在药学课程中纵向应用治疗知识存在许多挑战。这项研究调查了学生使用短信平台的参与情况,WhatsApp(元平台,Inc.),作为药学专业学生的讨论平台。
    创建的WhatsApp群聊讨论,“每日剂量,“是在药学专业学生去年的临床轮换或第三年的教学学习期间发生的纵向学习经历。在申请中每天向学生询问临床问题,并主要评估参与情况。这项研究包括一项预先调查,讨论参与评估,和事后调查。调查评估了学生对学习的自我评价,临床置信水平,董事会准备,和程序学习经验反馈。
    共提出115个问题,37名学生自愿加入。学生回答了97%的问题。在加入的37名学生中,81%是体验式教育学生,19%是教学教育学生。主持人需要提示参与34%的问题。大多数学生(95%)学到了新的东西。体验式教育的学生比说教式教育的学生更有可能参与。主持人可能有利于保持讨论活跃。参加“每日剂量”后,学生对临床信心和董事会准备的自我评估有所增加。
    每日剂量是参与学生讨论和加强药学治疗知识的创新方式。该工具可以扩展到与多个药房学习者一起使用。
    There are many challenges associated with longitudinally applying therapeutic knowledge in the pharmacy curriculum. This study investigated student participation using the messaging platform, WhatsApp (Meta Platforms, Inc.), as a discussion-based platform for pharmacy students.
    The created WhatsApp group chat discussion, \"The Daily Dose,\" was a longitudinal learning experience occurring during pharmacy students\' last year of clinical rotations or third year of didactic learning. Students were asked daily clinical questions in the application and participation was primarily assessed. This study included a pre-survey, discussion participation assessment, and a post-survey. The surveys assessed student self-evaluations of their learning, clinical confidence levels, board preparedness, and program learning experience feedback.
    A total of 115 questions were asked and 37 students voluntarily joined. Students participated by responding to 97% of questions. Of the 37 students who joined, 81% were experiential education students and 19% were didactic education students. A moderator needed to prompt for participation for 34% of the questions. The majority of students (95%) learned something new. Experiential education students were more likely to participate than didactic education students. A moderator may be beneficial to keep the discussion active. Students\' self-evaluations of clinical confidence and board preparedness increased after participating in The Daily Dose.
    The Daily Dose is an innovative way to engage student discussion and reinforce pharmacy therapeutic knowledge. This tool could be expanded to use with multiple pharmacy learners.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    文献认为儿童既是服用益生菌菌株的风险群体,也是可以从中受益最多的人群之一。由于与益生菌补充剂相关的健康益处,本范围审查旨在对鼠李糖乳杆菌GG,在食物和非食物基质中携带,和实验设计可能会影响婴儿和儿童的健康促进。在这项研究中,在三个科学数据库中进行了文献检索:PubMed,WebofScience,和SciELO来检索研究,以英文或西班牙文出版,对患有任何疾病或处于富营养化状态的婴儿和儿童施用鼠李糖乳杆菌GG。三位评审专家在专家的监督下筛选了540篇文章,发表于2001年至2022年之间,从数据库中检索。提取的数据已汇总并显示在此范围审查中。总的来说,包括在内,经过标准观察,这篇评论中有44篇文章。肠道疾病是这些研究中最常见的结果(36.4%)和胶囊,施用益生菌菌株的最常见载体(40.9%)。益生菌菌株的剂量范围为105至1012cfu/鼠李糖乳杆菌GG的剂量,干预时间从1个月延长至6个月以上。食品基质在57.1%的临床试验中显示出健康影响,非食品基质为46.7%,这表明益生菌GG菌株的健康促进作用在两种递送形式之间可能是等同的。然而,高度异质性的实验设计阻碍了进一步的分析,建议进行系统评价和荟萃分析,仅针对研究结果并实现数据同质性,以确定哪种载体最适合促进健康.
    The literature considers children both a risk group for administering probiotic strains and one of the populations that can most benefit from it. Due to the health benefits associated to probiotic supplementation, this scope review sought to formulate a critical evaluation of how Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, carried in food and non-food matrices, and experimental design may affect the health promotion of infants and children. In this study, a literature search was conducted in three scientific databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and SciELO to retrieve research, published in English or Spanish, which administered L. rhamnosus GG to infants and children with any disease or in eutrophic condition. Three reviewers with an expert supervision screened 540 articles, published between 2001 and 2022, which were retrieved from the databases. The data extracted was compiled and shown in this scoping review. In total, was included, after criteria observation, 44 articles in this review. Intestinal disorders were the most frequent outcome in these studies (36.4%) and capsules, the most common vehicle for administering the probiotic strain (40.9%). Probiotic strain dose ranged from 105 to 1012 cfu/dose of L. rhamnosus GG and intervention length extended from one to more than 6 months. Food matrix showed health effects in 57.1% of the clinical trials and non-food matrix 46.7%, which indicates that the health-promoting effect of the probiotic GG strain may be equivalent between the two forms of delivery. However, the highly heterogeneous experimental designs prevent further analysis and a systematic review and meta-analysis is recommended to address just the outcomes of studies and achieve data homogeneity in order to determine which vehicle is the most suitable for health promoting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    他克莫司是针对肾移植受者移植后排斥的主要免疫抑制剂。然而,他克莫司狭窄的治疗指数和个体间相当大的差异是治疗结果的挑战.本研究的目的是比较不同的机器学习和深度学习算法,并通过使用性能最佳的算法建立个性化的剂量预测模型。因此,在我们比较的10种常用算法中,TabNet算法优于其他具有最高R2(0.824)的算法,最低预测误差[平均绝对误差(MAE)0.468,均方误差(MSE)0.558和均方根误差(RMSE)0.745],和良好的性能高估(5.29%)或低估的剂量百分比(8.52%)。在最终的预测模型中,最后一次他克莫司日剂量,最后他克莫司治疗药物监测值,移植后的时间,血细胞比容,血清肌酐,天冬氨酸转氨酶,体重,CYP3A5,体重指数,和尿酸是对他克莫司日剂量影响最大的变量。本研究为深度学习技术在他克莫司剂量估算中的应用提供了参考,具有理想预测性能的TabNet模型有望在未来的临床实践中得到扩展和应用。
    Tacrolimus is a major immunosuppressor against post-transplant rejection in kidney transplant recipients. However, the narrow therapeutic index of tacrolimus and considerable variability among individuals are challenges for therapeutic outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare different machine learning and deep learning algorithms and establish individualized dose prediction models by using the best performing algorithm. Therefore, among the 10 commonly used algorithms we compared, the TabNet algorithm outperformed other algorithms with the highest R2 (0.824), the lowest prediction error [mean absolute error (MAE) 0.468, mean square error (MSE) 0.558, and root mean square error (RMSE) 0.745], and good performance of overestimated (5.29%) or underestimated dose percentage (8.52%). In the final prediction model, the last tacrolimus daily dose, the last tacrolimus therapeutic drug monitoring value, time after transplantation, hematocrit, serum creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, weight, CYP3A5, body mass index, and uric acid were the most influential variables on tacrolimus daily dose. Our study provides a reference for the application of deep learning technique in tacrolimus dose estimation, and the TabNet model with desirable predictive performance is expected to be expanded and applied in future clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    华法林的复杂剂量是在使用人群数据库进行观察性研究中测量其暴露量的重要障碍。使用不列颠哥伦比亚省基于人口的行政数据(1996-2019年),加拿大,我们开发了一种基于统计模型(随机效应华法林日供应(REWartharinDays))的方法,该方法涉及将随机效应线性回归模型拟合至患者随时间累积剂量,以估计华法林暴露量.模型参数包括来自处方记录的最小通用变量集,用于估计患者个性化平均每日华法林剂量。REWarDS估计值根据参考标准(使用配药药剂师输入的自由文本给药说明手动计算每日剂量)进行验证,并与替代方法(固定窗口,固定平板电脑,定义的每日剂量,和反向等待时间分布)使用皮尔逊相关系数(r),组内相关系数,和均方根误差。REWarDS估计的供应天数与参考标准具有很强的相关性和一致性(r=0.90(95%置信区间(CI):0.90,0.90);组内相关系数=0.95(95%CI:0.94,0.95);均方根误差=8.24天),并且优于所有替代方法。REWards-估计的供应天数是有效的,比所有其他可用方法的估计更准确。REWards有望在使用管理数据测量华法林暴露的研究中赋予最佳精度。
    Warfarin\'s complex dosing is a significant barrier to measurement of its exposure in observational studies using population databases. Using population-based administrative data (1996-2019) from British Columbia, Canada, we developed a method based on statistical modeling (Random Effects Warfarin Days\' Supply (REWarDS)) that involves fitting a random-effects linear regression model to patients\' cumulative dosage over time for estimation of warfarin exposure. Model parameters included a minimal universally available set of variables from prescription records for estimation of patients\' individualized average daily doses of warfarin. REWarDS estimates were validated against a reference standard (manual calculation of the daily dose using the free-text administration instructions entered by the dispensing pharmacist) and compared with alternative methods (fixed window, fixed tablet, defined daily dose, and reverse wait time distribution) using Pearson\'s correlation coefficient (r), the intraclass correlation coefficient, and the root mean squared error. REWarDS-estimated days\' supply showed strong correlation and agreement with the reference standard (r = 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90, 0.90); intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.95 (95% CI: 0.94, 0.95); root mean squared error = 8.24 days) and performed better than all of the alternative methods. REWarDS-estimated days\' supply was valid and more accurate than estimates from all other available methods. REWarDS is expected to confer optimal precision in studies measuring warfarin exposure using administrative data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To describe the different insulin therapy patterns and insulin daily doses in children and adolescents (aged 1-17 years) with type 1 diabetes.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study based on the longitudinal prescription (LRx) database (IQVIA) included children and adolescents who received at least two insulin prescriptions of the same drug from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2019. The study outcomes included the proportion of patients with insulin pumps and multiple daily injection therapy, human insulin and insulin analogue use, as well as insulin daily doses. A multivariable linear regression model was used to study the association between age, sex, insulin drugs, and daily dose.
    RESULTS: A total of 22 512 children and adolescents (mean age: 13.5 years, 47.1% female) were included. The proportion of patients using insulin pump therapy decreased with age, from 72.6% (females) and 73.0% (males) in the age group of younger than 6 years to 30.8% (females) and 26.1% (males) in adolescents. Insulin aspart was the most common short-acting insulin, with the proportion of users increasing from 56% in the age group of younger than 6 years to 69%-70% in the 13-17 years age group. The daily dose of insulin pump therapy was 10 units lower than multiple daily injection (MDI) (P < .001).
    CONCLUSIONS: We found a marked age dependency for pump use, with a strong increase observed in the youngest age group. Insulin aspart was the most frequently used analogue insulin. A higher total daily insulin dose was shown in patients on MDI versus insulin pump, along with a significant age dependency.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    There have been concerns that antipsychotics increase the incidence of hyperglycemic progression. Many factors have been suggested to contribute to the risk of antipsychotic-induced hyperglycemic progression, including the type, daily dose, and number of antipsychotics; however, few studies have examined these relationships. This study aimed to examine the affect of antipsychotic treatment-associated factors on hyperglycemic progression, after adjustment for the affect of background factors suggested to be associated with hyperglycemic progression. This was a nationwide, multicenter, prospective cohort study examining the incidence of hyperglycemic progression during a 12 mo period following the initiation of newly prescribed antipsychotic medication. Demographic data, medication history, and blood test values were collected from 631 study participants with normal blood glucose levels at baseline for 12 mo. The primary endpoint (incidence of hyperglycemic progression) was defined as progression from normal to prediabetic or probable diabetic status, and was evaluated based on the Japanese monitoring guidance in patients with schizophrenia. To further examine the affect of antipsychotics on glucose metabolism over time, we examined changes in HbA1c levels 3, 6, and 12 mo after the initiation of treatment with each antipsychotic. We found that treatment with zotepine and clozapine was associated with a significantly high incidence of hyperglycemic progression. Furthermore, changes in HbA1c levels 6 mo after the initiation of zotepine treatment were significantly higher than those following blonanserin and haloperidol treatments. In contrast, there was no significant difference in the change in total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and BMI during the same period. Moreover, the \"daily dose\" and \"number\" of antipsychotics did not show an association with the incidence of hyperglycemic progression. However, in a post hoc analysis in which the antipsychotics were divided into two groups according to the strength of blockade of H1, M1, M3, and 5-HT2C receptors, the incidence of hyperglycemic progression was higher in the medium- and high-daily dose groups than in the low-daily dose group in the antipsychotic group with strong blockade of these receptors. Our study indicated that the type of antipsychotic had a greater affect on the incidence of hyperglycemic progression than the daily dose of antipsychotics or their number. Among these, zotepine was most likely to increase the incidence of hyperglycemic progression, suggesting the need for caution when these antipsychotics are prescribed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号