DNA Mismatch Repair

DNA 错配修复
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    种系(林奇综合征,LS)和体细胞缺陷的错配修复蛋白(MMRd)与结直肠癌和子宫内膜癌有关;然而,它们对亚洲人群的预后影响尚不清楚.这项前瞻性队列研究旨在确定怀疑LS的癌症患者中种系和体细胞MMRd的患病率和结果。纳入疑似LS的结直肠癌或子宫内膜癌患者,并对病理样本的一部分(pMMRd)进行种系MMRd(gMMRd)的基因测序和MMR蛋白的免疫组织化学染色。在451名患者中,36例患者均为gMMRd(+)。与gMMRd(-)患者相比,gMMRd(+)患者的10年无复发生存率明显较高(100%vs.77.9%;p=0.006),而10年总生存率相似(100%vs.90.9%;p=0.12)。在102名具有pMMR状态的gMMRd(-)患者中,13.7%为pMMRd(+)。gMMRd(-)pMMRd(-)患者的5年无复发生存率为62.9%,gMMRd(-)pMMRd(-)患者的5年无复发生存率为35.0%,均低于gMMRd(+)患者(100%;p<0.001)。这项研究表明,LS在结直肠癌和子宫内膜癌患者中具有良好的预后,并强调了在检测体细胞MMRd后进行种系遗传检测的重要性。
    Germline (Lynch syndrome, LS) and somatic deficiencies of mismatch repair proteins (MMRd) are linked to colorectal and endometrial cancer; however, their prognostic impact in Asian populations remains unclear. This prospective cohort study aimed to determine the prevalence and outcome of germline and somatic MMRd in cancer patients suspected of LS. Patients with colorectal or endometrial cancer suspected of LS were enrolled and underwent gene sequencing for germline MMRd (gMMRd) and immunohistochemistry staining of MMR proteins in a subset of the pathological samples (pMMRd). Among the 451 enrolled patients, 36 patients were gMMRd (+). Compared with gMMRd (-) patients, the 10-year relapse-free survival in gMMRd (+) patients was significantly higher (100% vs. 77.9%; p = 0.006), whereas the 10-year overall survival was similar (100% vs. 90.9%; p = 0.12). Among the 102 gMMRd (-) patients with available pMMR status, 13.7% were pMMRd (+). The 5-year relapse-free survival was 62.9% in gMMRd (-) pMMRd (+) patients and 35.0% in gMMRd (-) pMMRd (-) patients, both lower than gMMRd (+) patients (100%; p < 0.001). This study showed that having LS confers a favorable outcome in colorectal and endometrial cancer patients and highlights the importance of germline genetic testing following the detection of somatic MMRd.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    开放标签,II期RATIONALE-209研究评估了tislelizumab(抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1抗体)作为微卫星不稳定性高(MSI-H)/错配修复缺陷(dMMR)肿瘤的组织不可知单药治疗.
    曾接受过治疗的成年人,纳入局部晚期不可切除或转移性MSI-H/dMMR实体瘤.患者每3周静脉注射tislelizumab200mg。客观缓解率(ORR;主要终点),响应持续时间(DoR),和无进展生存期(PFS)由独立审查委员会进行评估(实体瘤反应评估标准1.1版).
    80例患者被纳入并接受治疗;75例(93.8%)患者在基线时具有可测量的疾病。大多数患有转移性疾病,并接受了至少一种晚期/转移性疾病的先前治疗(n=79;98.8%)。在初步分析(数据截止时间2021年7月8日;中位随访15.2个月),总体ORR[46.7%;95%置信区间(95%CI),35.1-58.6;单侧P<0.0001],肿瘤特异性亚组的ORR[结直肠(n=46):39.1%(95%CI,25.1-54.6);胃/胃食管交界处(n=9):55.6%(95%CI,21.2-86.3);其他(n=20):60.0%(95%CI,36.1-80.9)]预设的历史对照ORR为10%;5例(6.7%)患者完全缓解.中位数DoR,PFS,长期随访未达到总生存期(数据截止时间2022年12月5日;中位随访28.9个月).Tislelizumab耐受性良好,没有意外的安全信号。53.8%的患者发生≥3级的治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs);7.5%的患者因TRAEs而停止治疗。
    Tislelizumab在以前接受过治疗的患者中显示出显着的ORR改善,局部晚期不可切除或转移性MSI-H/dMMR肿瘤,通常耐受性良好。
    UNASSIGNED: The open-label, phase II RATIONALE-209 study evaluated tislelizumab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody) as a tissue-agnostic monotherapy for microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors.
    UNASSIGNED: Adults with previously treated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors were enrolled. Patients received tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. Objective response rate (ORR; primary endpoint), duration of response (DoR), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by independent review committee (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1).
    UNASSIGNED: Eighty patients were enrolled and treated; 75 (93.8%) patients had measurable disease at baseline. Most had metastatic disease and received at least one prior therapy for advanced/metastatic disease (n=79; 98.8%). At primary analysis (data cutoff July 8, 2021; median follow-up 15.2 months), overall ORR [46.7%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 35.1-58.6; one-sided P<0.0001] and ORR across tumor-specific subgroups [colorectal (n=46): 39.1% (95% CI, 25.1-54.6); gastric/gastroesophageal junction (n=9): 55.6% (95% CI, 21.2-86.3); others (n=20): 60.0% (95% CI, 36.1-80.9)] were significantly greater with tislelizumab vs. a prespecified historical control ORR of 10%; five (6.7%) patients had complete responses. Median DoR, PFS, and overall survival were not reached with long-term follow-up (data cutoff December 5, 2022; median follow-up 28.9 months). Tislelizumab was well tolerated with no unexpected safety signals. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade ≥3 occurred in 53.8% of patients; 7.5% of patients discontinued treatment due to TRAEs.
    UNASSIGNED: Tislelizumab demonstrated a significant ORR improvement in patients with previously treated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic MSI-H/dMMR tumors and was generally well tolerated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在新辅助和辅助环境中的长期生存益处对于具有错配修复缺陷(dMMR)或微卫星不稳定性高(MSI-H)的结直肠癌(CRC)和胃癌(GC)尚不清楚。
    方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了接受至少一剂新辅助ICIs(新辅助队列,NAC)或佐剂ICIs(佐剂队列,AC)在中国的17个中心。如果所有肿瘤病变均可彻底切除,则IV期疾病患者也符合资格。
    结果:在NAC(n=124)中,客观反应率分别为75.7%和55.4%,分别,在CRC和GC中,病理完全缓解率分别为73.4%和47.7%,分别。3年无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)分别为96%(95CI90-100%)和CRC的100%(中位随访时间[mFU]29.4个月),分别,GC(MFU33.0个月)分别为84%(72-96%)和93%(85-100%),分别。在AC(n=48)中,3年DFS和OS率为94%(84-100%),CRC(MFU35.5个月)为100%,分别,GC(MFU40.4个月)分别为92%(82-100%)和96%(88-100%),分别。在7名远处复发的患者中,4人接受了PD1和CTLA4联合或不联合化疗和靶向药物的双重阻断,有三个部分反应和一个进行性疾病。
    结论:经过相对较长的随访,这项研究表明,在dMMR/MSI-HCRC和GC中,新佐剂和佐剂ICIs可能都与有希望的DFS和OS有关,这应该在进一步的随机临床试验中得到证实。
    BACKGROUND: The long-term survival benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings is unclear for colorectal cancers (CRC) and gastric cancers (GC) with deficiency of mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H).
    METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled patients with dMMR/MSI-H CRC and GC who received at least one dose of neoadjuvant ICIs (neoadjuvant cohort, NAC) or adjuvant ICIs (adjuvant cohort, AC) at 17 centers in China. Patients with stage IV disease were also eligible if all tumor lesions were radically resectable.
    RESULTS: In NAC (n = 124), objective response rates were 75.7% and 55.4%, respectively, in CRC and GC, and pathological complete response rates were 73.4% and 47.7%, respectively. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 96% (95%CI 90-100%) and 100% for CRC (median follow-up [mFU] 29.4 months), respectively, and were 84% (72-96%) and 93% (85-100%) for GC (mFU 33.0 months), respectively. In AC (n = 48), the 3-year DFS and OS rates were 94% (84-100%) and 100% for CRC (mFU 35.5 months), respectively, and were 92% (82-100%) and 96% (88-100%) for GC (mFU 40.4 months), respectively. Among the seven patients with distant relapse, four received dual blockade of PD1 and CTLA4 combined with or without chemo- and targeted drugs, with three partial response and one progressive disease.
    CONCLUSIONS: With a relatively long follow-up, this study demonstrated that neoadjuvant and adjuvant ICIs might be both associated with promising DFS and OS in dMMR/MSI-H CRC and GC, which should be confirmed in further randomized clinical trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由DNA错配修复(MMR)缺陷引起的微卫星不稳定性(MSI)在发生中具有重要意义,结直肠癌(CRC)的诊断和治疗。
    目的:本研究旨在分析CRC错配修复状态与临床特征的关系。
    方法:确定了2018年至2020年在两个中心接受手术的2029例CRC患者的组织病理学结果和临床特征。在通过机器学习算法筛选临床特征的重要性之后,根据免疫组织化学结果将患者分为错配修复缺陷组(dMMR)和错配修复熟练组(pMMR),用统计学方法观察两组间的临床特征.
    结果:dMMR和pMMR组在组织学类型上有显著差异,TNM阶段,肿瘤最大直径,淋巴结转移,分化等级,粗糙的外观,和血管侵入。MLH1组之间在年龄上有显著差异,组织学类型,TNM阶段,淋巴结转移,肿瘤位置,入侵的深度。MSH2组年龄差异显著。MSH6组年龄差异显著,组织学类型,TNM阶段。PMS2组之间在淋巴结转移和肿瘤位置方面存在显着差异。CRC以MLH1和PMS2联合表达缺失为主(41.77%)。MLH1和MSH2之间以及MSH6和PMS2之间也存在正相关。
    结论:粘液腺癌的比例,突出型,dMMRCRC的分化较差,但淋巴结转移是罕见的。值得注意的是,MMR蛋白的表达在CRC疾病的不同阶段具有不同的预后意义。
    BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability (MSI) caused by DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is of great significance in the occurrence, diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC).
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the relationship between mismatch repair status and clinical characteristics of CRC.
    METHODS: The histopathological results and clinical characteristics of 2029 patients who suffered from CRC and underwent surgery at two centers from 2018 to 2020 were determined. After screening the importance of clinical characteristics through machine learning algorithms, the patients were divided into deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) groups based on the immunohistochemistry results and the clinical feature data between the two groups were observed by statistical methods.
    RESULTS: The dMMR and pMMR groups had significant differences in histologic type, TNM stage, maximum tumor diameter, lymph node metastasis, differentiation grade, gross appearance, and vascular invasion. There were significant differences between the MLH1 groups in age, histologic type, TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, tumor location, and depth of invasion. The MSH2 groups were significantly different in age. The MSH6 groups had significant differences in age, histologic type, and TNM stage. There were significant differences between the PMS2 groups in lymph node metastasis and tumor location. CRC was dominated by MLH1 and PMS2 combined expression loss (41.77%). There was a positive correlation between MLH1 and MSH2 and between MSH6 and PMS2 as well.
    CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of mucinous adenocarcinoma, protruding type, and poor differentiation is relatively high in dMMR CRCs, but lymph node metastasis is rare. It is worth noting that the expression of MMR protein has different prognostic significance in different stages of CRC disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of sporadic mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer. Methods: A total of 120 cases of sporadic dMMR colorectal cancer from July 2015 to April 2021 were retrospectively collected in Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. Patients with Lynch syndrome; synchronous multiple colorectal cancers; preoperative anti-tumor treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy; and those with incomplete follow-up information were excluded based on family history and next-generation sequencing (NGS) test results. Immunohistochemical stains were used to detect the expression of mismatch repair proteins, methylation-specific PCR for methylation testing, and fluorescent PCR for BRAF V600E gene mutation detection. The clinical and pathological data, and gene mutation status were analyzed. Follow-up was done to assess survival and prognosis including progression-free survival and overall survival rate. Results: Sporadic dMMR colorectal cancer occurred more frequently in the right side of the colon, in females, and in the elderly. Morphologically, it was mostly moderately-differentiated, and most patients had low-grade tumor budding. In terms of immunohistochemical expression, MLH1 and PMS2 loss were dominant, and there were age and location-specificities in protein expression. MLH1 methylation was commonly detected in elderly female patients and rare in young male patients; while MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency, and BRAF V600E mutation occurred more often on the right side (P<0.05). The 3-year and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 90.7% and 88.7% respectively, and the 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 92.8% and 90.7% respectively. Tumor budding status was an independent risk factor affecting patient recurrence (hazard ratio=3.375, 95% confidence interval: 1.060-10.741, P=0.039), patients with low-grade tumor budding had better prognosis, and those with medium or high-grade tumor budding had poor prognosis. Conclusion: For dMMR colorectal cancer patients, tumor budding status is an independent risk factor for recurrence.
    目的: 深入探讨散发性错配修复缺陷(dMMR)结直肠癌的临床病理学特征,并分析影响其预后的关键因素。 方法: 回顾性收集2015年7月至2021年4月在中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院接受治疗的120例散发性dMMR结直肠癌患者的资料。根据家族史及二代测序检测结果排除林奇综合征患者,排除同时性多发结直肠癌术前进行放化疗等抗肿瘤治疗以及随访资料缺失的患者。采用免疫组织化学方法检测错配修复蛋白的表达情况,利用甲基化特异性PCR方法进行甲基化检测,通过荧光PCR方法对BRAF V600E基因突变进行筛查。主要观察指标包括临床病理资料、基因突变状况、随访数据以及生存与预后分析。预后指标主要关注疾病无进展生存期和总体生存期。 结果: 散发性dMMR结直肠癌更常见于右半结肠、女性和老年患者,形态学以中分化居多,存在低级别肿瘤出芽的患者占多数。免疫组织化学表达方面,以MLH1、PMS2缺失为主,且蛋白表达有年龄及部位的特殊性。MLH1甲基化多见于老年女性患者,而在MLH1和PMS2缺失的年轻男性患者中较为少见。BRAF V600E基因突变在右半结肠的肿瘤中检出频率更高(P<0.05)。此类肿瘤患者的3年和5年无进展生存率分别为90.7%和88.7%,3年和5年总体生存率分别为92.8%和90.7%。肿瘤出芽状态是影响肿瘤复发的独立危险因素(风险比=3.375,95%置信区间:1.060~10.741,P=0.039),其中低级别肿瘤出芽的患者预后较好,而中、高级别肿瘤出芽的患者预后较差。 结论: 在散发性dMMR结直肠癌患者中,肿瘤出芽状态是影响肿瘤复发的独立危险因素。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:错配修复缺陷(MMRd)子宫内膜癌(EC)的患者可以从免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)中获得巨大的益处。然而,并不是所有的反应和预测的主要抗性缺乏。
    方法:我们比较了MMRdECICI应答者(Rs)和ICI非应答者(NRs)的免疫肿瘤微环境,使用空间多重免疫谱分析和无监督层次聚类分析。
    结果:总体而言,NRs表现出显著降低的CD8+,不存在终末分化的T细胞,缺乏成熟的三级淋巴结构和树突状细胞,以及人类白细胞抗原I类的丢失。然而,没有一个单一的标志物可以可靠地预测R和NR。聚类分析确定了四个免疫特征的组合,证明了准确预测ICI反应,具有92%的鉴别力。最后,80%的NRs缺乏程序性死亡配体1,然而,60%表现出另一个可操作的免疫检查点(T细胞免疫球蛋白和含蛋白3的粘蛋白,吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶1或淋巴细胞激活基因3)。
    结论:这些发现强调了免疫肿瘤微环境特征在识别MMRdEC和ICI主要耐药患者方面的潜力,这些患者应面向测试新型免疫治疗组合的试验。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) endometrial cancer (EC) can derive great benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However not all responses and predictors of primary resistance are lacking.
    METHODS: We compared the immune tumor microenvironment of MMRd EC ICI-responders (Rs) and ICI non-responders (NRs), using spatial multiplexed immune profiling and unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis.
    RESULTS: Overall, NRs exhibited drastically lower CD8+, absent terminally differentiated T cells, lack of mature tertiary lymphoid structures and dendritic cells, as well as loss of human leukocyte antigen class I. However, no single marker could predict R versus NR with confidence. Clustering analysis identified a combination of four immune features that demonstrated that accurately predicted ICI response, with a discriminative power of 92%. Finally, 80% of NRs lacked programmed death-ligand 1, however, 60% exhibited another actionable immune checkpoint (T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin containing protein-3, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1, or lymphocyte activation gene 3).
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the potential of immune tumor microenvironment features for identifying patients with MMRd EC and primary resistance to ICI who should be oriented towards trials testing novel immunotherapeutic combinations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管早期发现的宫颈癌与良好的生存率相关,晚期疾病的预后较差,治疗方案稀少.错配修复缺陷(MMR-D)已成为几种癌症类型的预后和对免疫检查点抑制剂反应的预测因子。但其在宫颈癌中的价值尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定MMR-D在宫颈癌中的患病率,并评估MMR蛋白表达的预后价值。
    方法:在前瞻性收集的宫颈癌队列(n=508)中,通过免疫组织化学染色研究了MMR蛋白MLH-1,PMS-2,MSH-2和MSH-6的表达,并获得相应的临床病理和随访数据。切片被评分为缺失或完整表达以定义MMR-D,通过染色指数,根据染色强度和面积,评估预后潜力。RNA和全外显子组测序数据可用于72和75名患者,并用于基因集富集和突变分析。分别。
    结果:有5例(1%)肿瘤缺乏MMR,其中三个是神经内分泌组织学。MMR状态不能预测生存(HR1.93,p=0.17)。MSH-2低(n=48)与低生存率相关(HR1.94,p=0.02),也在调整肿瘤分期时,肿瘤类型,和患者年龄(HR2.06,p=0.013)。MSH-2低肿瘤具有较高的肿瘤突变负荷(p=0.003)和双链断裂修复基因RAD50中(移码)突变的频率较高(p<0.01)。
    结论:MMR-D在宫颈癌中罕见,然而,低MSH-2表达是生存不良的独立预测因素。
    OBJECTIVE: Although early-detected cervical cancer is associated with good survival, the prognosis for late-stage disease is poor and treatment options are sparse. Mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D) has surfaced as a predictor of prognosis and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor(s) in several cancer types, but its value in cervical cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to define the prevalence of MMR-D in cervical cancer and assess the prognostic value of MMR protein expression.
    METHODS: Expression of the MMR proteins MLH-1, PMS-2, MSH-2, and MSH-6 was investigated by immunohistochemical staining in a prospectively collected cervical cancer cohort (n=508) with corresponding clinicopathological and follow-up data. Sections were scored as either loss or intact expression to define MMR-D, and by a staining index, based on staining intensity and area, evaluating the prognostic potential. RNA and whole exome sequencing data were available for 72 and 75 of the patients and were used for gene set enrichment and mutational analyses, respectively.
    RESULTS: Five (1%) tumors were MMR-deficient, three of which were of neuroendocrine histology. MMR status did not predict survival (HR 1.93, p=0.17). MSH-2 low (n=48) was associated with poor survival (HR 1.94, p=0.02), also when adjusting for tumor stage, tumor type, and patient age (HR 2.06, p=0.013). MSH-2 low tumors had higher tumor mutational burden (p=0.003) and higher frequency of (frameshift) mutations in the double-strand break repair gene RAD50 (p<0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: MMR-D is rare in cervical cancer, yet low MSH-2 expression is an independent predictor of poor survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    亨廷顿病(HD)是由亨廷顿(HTT)基因的CAG扩增引起的显性遗传性神经退行性疾病,其特征是进行性运动,认知,和神经精神衰退。最近,除CAG重复外,新的遗传因素也与疾病的发病机理有关。大多数遗传修饰剂参与DNA修复途径,作为HTT基因中CAA中断丢失的原因,它们通过躯体扩张发挥主要影响。然而,这种机制可能不是HD发病机制的唯一驱动因素,和未来的研究是必要的,在这一领域。本综述的目的是剖析HD发病机制中遗传学的许多面孔,从顺式和反式作用的遗传修饰剂到RNA毒性,线粒体DNA突变,和表观遗传学因素。探索HD发病和进展的遗传修饰似乎不仅对阐明疾病的发病机制至关重要,还要提高疾病的预测和预防,开发疾病进展和对治疗反应的生物标志物,并认识到新的治疗机会。由于在其他重复扩张疾病中也描述了相同的遗传机制,它们的含义可能涵盖了这些疾病的全部范围。
    Huntington disease (HD) is a dominantly inherited neurodegenerative disorder caused by a CAG expansion on the huntingtin (HTT) gene and is characterized by progressive motor, cognitive, and neuropsychiatric decline. Recently, new genetic factors besides CAG repeats have been implicated in the disease pathogenesis. Most genetic modifiers are involved in DNA repair pathways and, as the cause of the loss of CAA interruption in the HTT gene, they exert their main influence through somatic expansion. However, this mechanism might not be the only driver of HD pathogenesis, and future studies are warranted in this field. The aim of the present review is to dissect the many faces of genetics in HD pathogenesis, from cis- and trans-acting genetic modifiers to RNA toxicity, mitochondrial DNA mutations, and epigenetics factors. Exploring genetic modifiers of HD onset and progression appears crucial to elucidate not only disease pathogenesis, but also to improve disease prediction and prevention, develop biomarkers of disease progression and response to therapies, and recognize new therapeutic opportunities. Since the same genetic mechanisms are also described in other repeat expansion diseases, their implications might encompass the whole spectrum of these disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    DNA错配修复(MMRd)的缺陷在癌症基因组中留下了微卫星不稳定性(MSI)的特征性足迹。我们使用来自癌症基因组图谱和国际癌症基因组联盟的数据对MSI相关癌症进行了全面分析,专注于indel突变签名。我们根据其indel谱将MSI高基因组分为两个亚型:缺失显性(MMRd-del)和插入显性(MMRd-ins)。与MMRd-del基因组相比,MMRd-ins基因组表现出不同的突变和转录组特征,包括T>C取代和相关突变特征的患病率较高。MMRd-ins和MMRd-del基因组中的短插入和缺失靶向不同的基因集,导致两个亚型之间不同的indel配置文件。此外,MMRd-ins基因组中的indel富含亚克隆改变,这些亚克隆改变提供了有关MMRd-ins和MMRd-del基因组之间独特进化关系的线索。值得注意的是,转录组分析表明MMRd-ins癌症上调免疫相关基因,显示高水平的免疫细胞浸润,并显示出升高的新抗原负荷。两种类型的MMRd基因组之间的基因组和转录组差异突出了遗传机制的异质性,以及导致癌症的基因组足迹和转录组变化。具有潜在的临床意义。
    Deficiencies in DNA mismatch repair (MMRd) leave characteristic footprints of microsatellite instability (MSI) in cancer genomes. We used data from the Cancer Genome Atlas and International Cancer Genome Consortium to conduct a comprehensive analysis of MSI-associated cancers, focusing on indel mutational signatures. We classified MSI-high genomes into two subtypes based on their indel profiles: deletion-dominant (MMRd-del) and insertion-dominant (MMRd-ins). Compared with MMRd-del genomes, MMRd-ins genomes exhibit distinct mutational and transcriptomic features, including a higher prevalence of T>C substitutions and related mutation signatures. Short insertions and deletions in MMRd-ins and MMRd-del genomes target different sets of genes, resulting in distinct indel profiles between the two subtypes. In addition, indels in the MMRd-ins genomes are enriched with subclonal alterations that provide clues about a distinct evolutionary relationship between the MMRd-ins and MMRd-del genomes. Notably, the transcriptome analysis indicated that MMRd-ins cancers upregulate immune-related genes, show a high level of immune cell infiltration, and display an elevated neoantigen burden. The genomic and transcriptomic distinctions between the two types of MMRd genomes highlight the heterogeneity of genetic mechanisms and resulting genomic footprints and transcriptomic changes in cancers, which has potential clinical implications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:乳腺癌,特别是三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC),造成了巨大的全球卫生负担。在引入免疫治疗之前,化疗是TNBC患者的主要治疗方法。研究表明,在TNBC中,错配修复蛋白(MMRP)缺乏症的患病率(0.2%至18.6%),最近的研究强调了免疫疗法治疗MMRP缺陷型转移性乳腺癌的潜力。本研究旨在使用免疫组织化学方法鉴定TNBC患者中的MMRP缺乏。
    方法:采用回顾性队列研究设计,纳入2015年至2021年在侯赛因国王癌症中心接受治疗的TNBC患者。进行免疫组织化学以评估MMRP表达。
    结果:在152名患者中,14(9.2%)表现出缺乏MMR(dMMR)。在13例患者中观察到PMS2表达的缺失,其中5例显示MLH1表达丧失。在一名患者中观察到MSH6和MSH2表达的缺失。中位随访时间为44(3-102)个月。尽管存活率较高(80.8%,5年)的DMMR患者比熟练的MMR患者(62.3%),两组的总生存期无显著差异.
    结论:大约9%的TNBC患者表现出dMMR。dMMR可用于预测结果和确定可能受益于免疫治疗的TNBC患者。
    BACKGROUND: Breast cancer, particularly triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), poses a significant global health burden. Chemotherapy was the mainstay treatment for TNBC patients until immunotherapy was introduced. Studies indicate a noteworthy prevalence (0.2% to 18.6%) of mismatch repair protein (MMRP) deficiency in TNBC, with recent research highlighting the potential of immunotherapy for MMRP-deficient metastatic breast cancer. This study aims to identify MMRP deficiency in TNBC patients using immunohistochemistry.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design was used and included TNBC patients treated between 2015 and 2021 at King Hussein Cancer Center. Immunohistochemistry was conducted to assess MMRP expression.
    RESULTS: Among 152 patients, 14 (9.2%) exhibited deficient MMR (dMMR). Loss of PMS2 expression was observed in 13 patients, 5 of whom showed loss of MLH1 expression. Loss of MSH6 and MSH2 expression was observed in one patient. The median follow-up duration was 44 (3-102) months. Despite the higher survival rate (80.8%, 5 years) of dMMR patients than of proficient MMR patients (62.3%), overall survival did not significantly differ between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 9% of TNBC patients exhibit dMMR. dMMR could be used to predict outcomes and identify patients with TNBC who may benefit from immunotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号