Reintroduction efforts are increasingly used to mitigate biodiversity losses, but are frequently challenged by inadequate planning and uncertainty. High quality information about population status and threats can be used to prioritize reintroduction and restoration efforts and can transform ad hoc approaches into opportunities for improving conservation outcomes at a landscape scale. We conducted comprehensive environmental DNA (eDNA) and visual encounter surveys to determine the distribution of native and non-native aquatic species in two high-priority watersheds to address key uncertainties-such as the distribution of threats and the status of existing populations-inherent in restoration planning. We then used these occurrence data to develop a menu of potential conservation actions and a decision framework to benefit an endangered vertebrate (foothill yellow-legged frog, Rana boylii) in dynamic stream systems. Our framework combines the strengths of multiple methods, allowing managers and conservation scientists to incorporate conservation science and site-specific knowledge into the planning process to increase the likelihood of achieving conservation goals.

Environmental DNA (eDNA) surveys promise to be a sensitive and powerful tool for the detection of trematodes. This can contribute to the limited studies on trematode ecology, specifically in aquatic ecosystems. Here, we developed species-specific primer and probe sets for Moliniella anceps, Opisthioglyphe ranae, and Plagiorchis multiglandularis cercariae and applied a novel eDNA qPCR assay to detect larval trematodes quantitatively. We evaluated the effectiveness of the assays using filtered lake water samples collected from different sites of Lake Fadikha and Kargat River Estuary in Lake Chany, Russia, showing high species specificity and sensitivity in all 3 assays. Further, all 3 assays had high efficiencies ranging from 94.9 to 105.8%. Moliniella anceps, O. ranae, and P. multiglandularis were detected in the environmental water samples through real-time PCR. Thus, we anticipate that our approach will be beneficial for biomonitoring, measuring, and managing ecological systems.

Tropical ecosystems host a significant share of global fish diversity contributing substantially to the global fisheries sector. Yet their sustainable management is challenging due to their complexity, diverse life history traits of tropical fishes, and varied fishing techniques involved. Traditional monitoring techniques are often costly, labour-intensive, and/or difficult to apply in inaccessible sites. These limitations call for the adoption of innovative, sensitive, and cost-effective monitoring solutions, especially in a scenario of climate change. Environmental DNA (eDNA) emerges as a potential game changer for biodiversity monitoring and conservation, especially in aquatic ecosystems. However, its utility in tropical settings remains underexplored, primarily due to a series of challenges, including the need for a comprehensive barcode reference library, an understanding of eDNA behaviour in tropical aquatic environments, standardized procedures, and supportive biomonitoring policies. Despite these challenges, the potential of eDNA for sensitive species detection across varied habitats is evident, and its global use is accelerating in biodiversity conservation efforts. This review takes an in-depth look at the current state and prospects of eDNA-based monitoring in tropical fisheries management research. Additionally, a SWOT analysis is used to underscore the opportunities and threats, with the aim of bridging the knowledge gaps and guiding the more extensive and effective use of eDNA-based monitoring in tropical fisheries management. Although the discussion applies worldwide, some specific experiences and insights from Indian tropical fisheries are shared to illustrate the practical application and challenges of employing eDNA in a tropical context.

Monitoring mollusk biodiversity is a great challenge due to their large diversity and broad distribution. Environmental DNA (eDNA) technology is increasingly applied for biodiversity monitoring, but relevant studies on marine mollusks are still limited. Although previous studies have developed several pairs of primers for mollusk eDNA analyses, most of them targeted only a small group of mollusks. In this study, seven primers were designed for the mollusk community and validated and compared with eight pairs of published primers to select the best candidates. After in silico test, MollCOI154 and MollCOI255 primers showed non-specific amplification, and same results were also obtained in published primers (COI204, Sepi, and veneroida). Moll12S100, Moll12S195 and Moll16S primers failed to amplify across all genomic DNA from selected mollusk. Except Moll16S, all developed and two published (unionoida and veneroida) primers were successfully amplified on four eDNA samples from Yangtze River estuary. After annotation of the amplified sequences, MollCOI253 showed higher annotation of the amplification results than the other primers. In conclusion, MollCOI253 had better performance in terms of amplification success and specificity, and can provide technical support for eDNA-based research, which will be beneficial for molluscan biodiversity investigation and conservation.

One of the main reasons for the decline in global freshwater biodiversity can be attributed to alterations in hydrological conditions resulting from dam construction. However, the majority of current research has focused on single or limited numbers of dams. Here, we carried out a seasonal fish survey, using environmental DNA (eDNA) method, on the Wujiang River mainstream (Tributaries of the Yangtze River, China) to investigate the impact of large-scale cascade hydropower development on changes in fish diversity patterns. eDNA survey revealed that native fish species have decreased in contrast to alien fish. There was also a shift in fish community structure, with declines of the dominant rheophilic fish species, an increase of the small-size fish species, and homogenization of species composition across reservoirs. Additionally, environmental factors, such as temperature, dissolved oxygen and reservoir age, had a significant effect on fish community diversity. This study provides basic information for the evaluation of the impact of cascade developments on fish diversity patterns.

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is a technique increasingly used for monitoring organisms in the natural environment including riverine macroinvertebrates. However, the effectiveness of eDNA for monitoring riverine macroinvertebrates compared with the more traditional method of sampling the organisms directly and identifying them via morphological analysis, has not been well established. Furthermore, the ability of the various gene markers and PCR primer sets to detect the full range of riverine invertebrate taxa has not been quantified. Here we conducted a meta-analysis of the available literature, to assess the effectiveness of eDNA sampling for detecting riverine macroinvertebrates compared with sampling for the organisms directly and applying morphological analysis. We found, on average, eDNA sampling, irrespective of the gene marker used, detected fewer riverine invertebrates than morphological sampling. The most effective PCR primer set for identifying taxa was mlCOIintF/jgHCO2198, (mlCOIintF- forward primer, jgHCO2198, - reverse primer). Regardless of the gene marker or primer sets used, however, many taxa were not detected by eDNA metabarcoding that were detected by sampling directly for these invertebrates, including over 100 members of Arthropoda. eDNA sampling failed to detect any species belonging to Nematoda, Platyhelminthes, Cnidaria or Nematomorpha and these markers applied for eDNA sampling in terrestrial systems also do not detect members of Nematoda. In addition to these issues, uncertainties relating to false positives from upstream DNA sources, the stability of DNA from different species, differences in the propensity for DNA release into the environment for different organisms, and lack of available sequence information for numerous taxa illustrates the use of eDNA is not yet applicable as a robust stand-alone method for the monitoring of riverine invertebrates. As a primary consideration, further methodological developments are needed to ensure eDNA captures some of the key freshwater taxa, notably taxa belonging to the phyla Arthropoda, Nematoda, Platyhelminthes, Cnidaria and Nematomorpha.

Anthropogenically forced changes in global freshwater biodiversity demand more efficient monitoring approaches. Consequently, environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is enabling ecosystem-scale biodiversity assessment, yet the appropriate spatio-temporal resolution of robust biodiversity assessment remains ambiguous. Here, using intensive, spatio-temporal eDNA sampling across space (five rivers in Europe and North America, with an upper range of 20-35 km between samples), time (19 timepoints between 2017 and 2018) and environmental conditions (river flow, pH, conductivity, temperature and rainfall), we characterise the resolution at which information on diversity across the animal kingdom can be gathered from rivers using eDNA. In space, beta diversity was mainly dictated by turnover, on a scale of tens of kilometres, highlighting that diversity measures are not confounded by eDNA from upstream. Fish communities showed nested assemblages along some rivers, coinciding with habitat use. Across time, seasonal life history events, including salmon and eel migration, were detected. Finally, effects of environmental conditions were taxon-specific, reflecting habitat filtering of communities rather than effects on DNA molecules. We conclude that riverine eDNA metabarcoding can measure biodiversity at spatio-temporal scales relevant to species and community ecology, demonstrating its utility in delivering insights into river community ecology during a time of environmental change.

Estuarine ecosystems face increasing anthropogenic pressures, necessitating effective monitoring methods to mitigate their impacts on the biodiversity they harbour. The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) based detection methods is increasingly recognized as a promising tool to complement other, potentially invasive monitoring techniques. Integrating such eDNA analyses into monitoring frameworks for large ecosystems is still challenging and requires a deeper understanding of the scale and resolution at which eDNA patterns may offer insights in species presence and community composition space and time. The Scheldt estuary, characterized by its diverse habitats and complex currents, is one of the largest Western European tidal river systems. Until now, it remains challenging to obtain accurate information on fish communities living in and migrating through this ecosystem, consequently confining our knowledge to specific locations. To explore the potential of eDNA based monitoring, we simultaneously combine stow net fishing with eDNA metabarcoding, to assess spatiotemporal shifts in the Scheldt estuary\'s fish communities. In total, we detected 71 fish species in the estuary using eDNA metabarcoding, partly overlapping with historic fish community data gathered at the different study locations and in contrast to only 42 species using stow net fishing during the same survey period. Community compositions found by both detection methods varied among sampling locations, driven by a clear correlation to the salinity gradient. Limited effects of sampling depth and tide were observed on the eDNA metabarcoding data, allowing a significant reduction of the eDNA sampling effort for future eDNA fish monitoring campaigns in this study system. Our results further demonstrate that seasonal shifts in fish species occurrence can be detected using eDNA metabarcoding. Combining eDNA metabarcoding and stow net fishing further enhances our understanding of this vital waterway\'s diverse fish populations, allowing a higher resolution and more efficient monitoring strategy.

Determining biological status of freshwater ecosystems is critical for ensuring ecosystem health and maintaining associated services to such ecosystems. Freshwater macroinvertebrates respond predictably to environmental disturbances and are widely used in biomonitoring programs. However, many freshwater species are difficult to capture and sort from debris or substrate and morphological identification is challenging, especially larval stages, damaged specimens, or hyperdiverse groups such as Diptera. The advent of high throughput sequencing technologies has enhanced DNA barcoding tools to automatise species identification for whole communities, as metabarcoding is increasingly used to monitor biodiversity. However, recent comparisons have revealed little congruence between morphological and molecular-based identifications. Using broad range universal primers for DNA barcode marker cox1, we compare community composition captured between morphological and molecular-based approaches from different sources - tissue-based (bulk benthic and bulk drift samples) and environmental DNA (eDNA, filtered water) metabarcoding - for samples collected along a gradient of anthropogenic disturbances. For comparability, metabarcoding taxonomic assignments were filtered by taxa included in the standardised national biological metric IBMWP. At the family level, bulk benthic metabarcoding showed the highest congruence with morphology, and the most abundant taxa were captured by all techniques. Richness captured by morphology and bulk benthic metabarcoding decreased along the gradient, whereas richness recorded by eDNA remained constant and increased downstream when sequencing bulk drift. Estimates of biological metrics were higher using molecular than morphological identification. At species level, diversity captured by bulk benthic samples were higher than the other techniques. Importantly, bulk benthic and eDNA metabarcoding captured different and complementary portions of the community - benthic versus water column, respectively - and their combined use is recommended. While bulk benthic metabarcoding can likely replace morphology using similar benthic biological indices, water eDNA will require new metrics because this technique sequences a different portion of the community.

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is an increasingly useful method for detecting pelagic animals in the ocean but typically requires large water volumes to sample diverse assemblages. Ship-based pelagic sampling programs that could implement eDNA methods generally have restrictive water budgets. Studies that quantify how eDNA methods perform on low water volumes in the ocean are limited, especially in deep-sea habitats with low animal biomass and poorly described species assemblages. Using 12S rRNA and COI gene primers, we quantified assemblages comprised of micronekton, coastal forage fishes, and zooplankton from low volume eDNA seawater samples (n = 436, 380-1800 mL) collected at depths of 0-2200 m in the southern California Current. We compared diversity in eDNA samples to concurrently collected pelagic trawl samples (n = 27), detecting a higher diversity of vertebrate and invertebrate groups in the eDNA samples. Differences in assemblage composition could be explained by variability in size-selectivity among methods and DNA primer suitability across taxonomic groups. The number of reads and amplicon sequences variants (ASVs) did not vary substantially among shallow (<200 m) and deep samples (>600 m), but the proportion of invertebrate ASVs that could be assigned a species-level identification decreased with sampling depth. Using hierarchical clustering, we resolved horizontal and vertical variability in marine animal assemblages from samples characterized by a relatively low diversity of ecologically important species. Low volume eDNA samples will quantify greater taxonomic diversity as reference libraries, especially for deep-dwelling invertebrate species, continue to expand.