DLPFC

DLPFC
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    反复接触单词形式和含义可以改善词汇知识的获取。然而,一般脑区和语言特异性脑区在这一过程中的作用尚不清楚.为了调查这一点,我们对一般脑区(左背外侧前额叶皮层组)和特定脑区(LIFG组)应用间歇性theta爆发刺激,对照组接受假间歇theta爆发刺激。随后使用由3个学习阶段组成的人工单词学习任务,在功能磁共振成像中评估了间歇性theta爆发刺激效应。广义的心理生理相互作用分析探索了全脑功能连接,而动态因果模型估计了在重复暴露期间由间歇性theta爆发刺激调节的特定大脑区域中的因果相互作用。与假刺激相比,主动间歇性theta脉冲刺激提高了单词学习性能,并减少了学习阶段2中左岛的激活。在重复暴露期间,对域通用区域的主动间歇性theta爆发刺激增加了全脑功能连通性,并调节了大脑区域之间的有效连通性。当将主动的间歇性theta爆发刺激应用于语言特定区域时,未观察到这种效果。这些发现表明,领域通用区域在构词规则学习中起着至关重要的作用,在新单词学习过程中,通过间歇性theta爆发刺激增强全脑连接并促进关键大脑区域之间的有效信息交换。
    Repeated exposure to word forms and meanings improves lexical knowledge acquisition. However, the roles of domain-general and language-specific brain regions during this process remain unclear. To investigate this, we applied intermittent theta burst stimulation over the domain-general (group left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) and domain-specific (Group L IFG) brain regions, with a control group receiving sham intermittent theta burst stimulation. Intermittent theta burst stimulation effects were subsequently assessed in functional magnetic resonance imaging using an artificial word learning task which consisted of 3 learning phases. A generalized psychophysiological interaction analysis explored the whole brain functional connectivity, while dynamic causal modeling estimated causal interactions in specific brain regions modulated by intermittent theta burst stimulation during repeated exposure. Compared to sham stimulation, active intermittent theta burst stimulation improved word learning performance and reduced activation of the left insula in learning phase 2. Active intermittent theta burst stimulation over the domain-general region increased whole-brain functional connectivity and modulated effective connectivity between brain regions during repeated exposure. This effect was not observed when active intermittent theta burst stimulation was applied to the language-specific region. These findings suggest that the domain-general region plays a crucial role in word formation rule learning, with intermittent theta burst stimulation enhancing whole-brain connectivity and facilitating efficient information exchange between key brain regions during new word learning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们先前的研究综合了重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)试验的镇痛作用,直至2019年。在过去的几年中,疼痛试验显着增加,随着方法的变化,如样本量,刺激强度,和rTMS范例。
    目的:因此,本研究更新了DLPFC-rTMS对慢性疼痛的影响,并量化了不同研究方法学差异的影响。
    结果:共纳入36项研究。其中,26项研究为临床试验(更新=9,307/711患者),10名(更新=1,34/249名参与者)参与了疼痛研究.更新的荟萃分析不支持包括额外试验后对神经性疼痛的影响(pshort-term=0.20,pmid-term=0.50)。然而,在延长至六周随访的偏头痛试验中,有中等至较大的镇痛效果(SMDmid-term=-0.80,SMDlong-term=-0.51),这是以前没有报道的。考虑了研究的方法学差异。DLPFC-rTMS还诱导疼痛的情绪方面的潜在改善(SMDshort-term=-0.28)。
    结论:更新的系统荟萃分析继续支持慢性疼痛的镇痛效果。然而,更新的结果不再支持DLPFC-rTMS缓解神经性疼痛,并支持DLPFC-rTMS治疗偏头痛。也有证据表明DLPFC-rTMS可以改善疼痛的情绪方面。
    BACKGROUND: Our previous study synthesized the analgesic effects of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) trials up to 2019. There has been a significant increase in pain trials in the past few years, along with methodological variabilities such as sample size, stimulation intensity, and rTMS paradigms.
    OBJECTIVE: This study therefore updated the effects of DLPFC-rTMS on chronic pain and quantified the impact of methodological differences across studies.
    RESULTS: A total of 36 studies were included. Among them, 26 studies were clinical trials (update = 9, 307/711 patients), and 10 (update = 1, 34/249 participants) were provoked pain studies. The updated meta-analysis does not support an effect on neuropathic pain after including the additional trials (pshort-term = 0.20, pmid-term = 0.50). However, there is medium-to-large analgesic effect in migraine trials extending up to six weeks follow-up (SMDmid-term = -0.80, SMDlong-term = -0.51), that was not previously reported. Methodological differences wthine the studies were considered. DLPFC-rTMS also induces potential improvement in the emotional aspects of pain (SMDshort-term = -0.28).
    CONCLUSIONS: The updated systematic meta-analysis continues to support analgesic effects for chronic pain overall. However, the updated results no longer support DLPFC-rTMS for pain relief in neuropathic pain, and do supports DLPFC-rTMS in the management of migraine. There is also evidence for DLPFC-rTMS to improve emotional aspects of pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)振荡异常是精神分裂症的神经生理学特征,被认为是其认知缺陷的基础。经颅磁刺激与脑电图(TMS-EEG)提供了不受感觉中继功能和/或患者参与水平影响的皮质振荡的测量,这是精神分裂症的重要混杂因素。以前的TMS-EEG工作显示速度降低,伽马范围振荡和主要DLPFC振荡频率的减慢,或固有频率,慢性精神分裂症。然而,目前尚不清楚这种DLPFC固有频率减慢是否存在于早期病程精神分裂症(EC-SCZ)中,并与症状严重程度和认知功能障碍相关.
    方法:我们将TMS-EEG应用于30名EC-SCZ和28名健康对照(HC)受试者的左侧DLPFC。使用“AX”连续性能任务(AX-CPT)评估目标导向的工作记忆性能。刺激部位累积功率最高的EEG频率,或固有频率,被提取。我们还计算了本地相对频谱功率(RSP),即每个频带中的平均功率除以宽带功率。
    结果:与HC相比,EC-SCZ降低了DLPFC的固有频率(p=0.0000002,科恩的d=-2.32)和更高的DLPFCβ范围RSP(p=0.0003,科恩的d=0.77)。在EC-SCZ,DLPFC自然频率与阴性症状呈负相关.在所有参与者中,β波段RSP与AX-CPT性能呈负相关。
    结论:DLPFC振荡减慢是精神分裂症的早期病理生理生物标志物,与精神分裂症的症状严重程度和认知障碍有关。未来的工作应评估非侵入性神经刺激是否可以改善EC-SCZ的前额叶振荡缺陷和相关临床功能。
    BACKGROUND: Abnormalities in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) oscillations are neurophysiological signatures of schizophrenia thought to underlie its cognitive deficits. Transcranial magnetic stimulation with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) provides a measure of cortical oscillations unaffected by sensory relay functionality and/or patients\' level of engagement, which are important confounding factors in schizophrenia. Previous TMS-EEG work showed reduced fast, gamma-range oscillations and a slowing of the main DLPFC oscillatory frequency, or natural frequency, in chronic schizophrenia. However, it is unclear whether this DLPFC natural frequency slowing is present in early-course schizophrenia (EC-SCZ) and is associated with symptom severity and cognitive dysfunction.
    METHODS: We applied TMS-EEG to the left DLPFC in 30 EC-SCZ and 28 healthy control (HC) subjects. Goal-directed working memory performance was assessed using the \"AX\" Continuous Performance Task (AX-CPT). The EEG frequency with the highest cumulative power at the stimulation site, or natural frequency, was extracted. We also calculated the local Relative Spectral Power (RSP) as the average power in each frequency band divided by the broadband power.
    RESULTS: Compared to HC, EC-SCZ had reduced DLPFC natural frequency (p=0.0000002, Cohen\'s d=-2.32) and higher DLPFC beta-range RSP (p=0.0003, Cohen\'s d=0.77). In EC-SCZ, the DLPFC natural frequency was inversely associated with negative symptoms. Across all participants, the beta-band RSP negatively correlated with the AX-CPT performance.
    CONCLUSIONS: A DLPFC oscillatory slowing is an early pathophysiological biomarker of schizophrenia that is associated with its symptom severity and cognitive impairments. Future work should assess whether non-invasive neurostimulation can ameliorate prefrontal oscillatory deficits and related clinical functions in EC-SCZ.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已经提出了目标导向和习惯性控制之间的平衡,以确定工具行为的灵活性,在人类和动物中。这种观点得到了神经科学研究的支持,这些研究暗示了可分离的神经通路在结果值发生变化时灵活调整行为的能力。先前的扩散张量成像研究提供了初步证据,表明灵活的仪器性能取决于先前涉及目标指导和习惯性控制的平行皮质纹状体白质途径的强度。具体来说,估计尾状和腹内侧前额叶皮层之间的白质强度与行为灵活性呈正相关,和后部壳核-运动前皮层连通性负相关,符合这些途径争夺控制权的观点。然而,原始研究的样本量有限,到目前为止,没有尝试重复这些发现.在本研究中,我们旨在通过对205名年轻成年人的大样本进行测试,将皮质-纹状体连接与行动失误任务的表现联系起来,从概念上复制这些发现.总之,我们发现目标导向表现只有正的神经相关性,包括与背外侧前额叶皮层的纹状体连接(尾状核和前壳核)。然而,我们未能提供证据证明神经习惯系统的存在限制了灵活的能力,目标导向行动。我们讨论了我们的发现对工具作用的双过程理论的影响。
    The balance between goal-directed and habitual control has been proposed to determine the flexibility of instrumental behaviour, in both humans and animals. This view is supported by neuroscientific studies that have implicated dissociable neural pathways in the ability to flexibly adjust behaviour when outcome values change. A previous Diffusion Tensor Imaging study provided preliminary evidence that flexible instrumental performance depends on the strength of parallel cortico-striatal white-matter pathways previously implicated in goal-directed and habitual control. Specifically, estimated white-matter strength between caudate and ventromedial prefrontal cortex correlated positively with behavioural flexibility, and posterior putamen-premotor cortex connectivity correlated negatively, in line with the notion that these pathways compete for control. However, the sample size of the original study was limited, and so far, there have been no attempts to replicate these findings. In the present study, we aimed to conceptually replicate these findings by testing a large sample of 205 young adults to relate cortico-striatal connectivity to performance on the slips-of-action task. In short, we found only positive neural correlates of goal-directed performance, including striatal connectivity (caudate and anterior putamen) with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. However, we failed to provide converging evidence for the existence of a neural habit system that puts limits on the capacity for flexible, goal-directed action. We discuss the implications of our findings for dual-process theories of instrumental action.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经颅磁刺激(TMS)在治疗抑郁症中的应用越来越广泛。最常见的刺激目标,在背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC),来自抑郁症的早期神经影像学研究。最近,更严格的休闲方法揭示了全脑目标网络和基于局灶性脑损伤和局灶性脑刺激对抑郁症状的影响的反网络。治疗性DLPFC-TMS期间的症状改善似乎涉及DLPFC之间信号传导的方向性变化,遗传下和背侧前扣带皮质,和显著性网络区域。然而,不同的网络可能参与抑郁症其他TMS靶标的治疗机制,如背内侧前额叶皮质或眶额皮质。TMS治疗效果的持久性涉及突触神经可塑性,特别是可能取决于多巴胺作用于D1受体家族,以及NMDA受体依赖性突触可塑性机制。虽然TMS协议通常被认为是“兴奋性”或“抑制性”,个人的实际效果似乎变化很大,并且可能在突触群体而不是单个突触的水平上得到更好的理解。突触元可塑性可以提供内置的保护机制,以避免在治疗过程中失控的促进或抑制,并且可能导致TMS恶化而不是改善的患者数量相对较少。从行为学的角度来看,TMS的抗抑郁作用可能涉及促进与觅食/狩猎行为相关的全脑吸引子状态,以rostrolateral周围导水管灰色和显著性网络为中心,抑制与被动威胁防御相关的吸引子状态,以腹侧导水管周围灰色和默认模式网络为中心。
    Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is entering increasingly widespread use in treating depression. The most common stimulation target, in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), emerged from early neuroimaging studies in depression. Recently, more rigorous casual methods have revealed whole-brain target networks and anti-networks based on the effects of focal brain lesions and focal brain stimulation on depression symptoms. Symptom improvement during therapeutic DLPFC-TMS appears to involve directional changes in signaling between the DLPFC, subgenual and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and salience-network regions. However, different networks may be involved in the therapeutic mechanisms for other TMS targets in depression, such as dorsomedial prefrontal cortex or orbitofrontal cortex. The durability of therapeutic effects for TMS involves synaptic neuroplasticity, and specifically may depend upon dopamine acting at the D1 receptor family, as well as NMDA-receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity mechanisms. Although TMS protocols are classically considered \'excitatory\' or \'inhibitory\', the actual effects in individuals appear quite variable, and might be better understood at the level of populations of synapses rather than individual synapses. Synaptic meta-plasticity may provide a built-in protective mechanism to avoid runaway facilitation or inhibition during treatment, and may account for the relatively small number of patients who worsen rather than improve with TMS. From an ethological perspective, the antidepressant effects of TMS may involve promoting a whole-brain attractor state associated with foraging/hunting behaviors, centered on the rostrolateral periaqueductal gray and salience network, and suppressing an attractor state associated with passive threat defense, centered on the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray and default-mode network.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已发现腹外侧前额叶皮层(VLPFC)和背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)在负性情绪处理中起重要作用。然而,他们参与的具体时间窗口仍然未知。本研究通过使用单脉冲经颅磁刺激(TMS)的三个实验解决了这个问题。我们发现,与顶点条件相比,负面情绪暴露后400ms的TMS应用于VLPFC显着增强了负面情绪。此外,在负面情绪暴露后0ms和600ms在DLPFC上应用TMS也导致负面情绪恶化。这些发现为负性情绪处理中VLPFC依赖的语义处理(~400ms)和DLPFC依赖的注意和认知控制(~0/600ms)提供了潜在证据。这些额叶皮层的异步参与不仅加深了我们对负面情绪处理的神经机制的理解,而且还为针对情绪障碍患者的神经刺激治疗提供了有价值的时间参数。
    The ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) have been found to play important roles in negative emotion processing. However, the specific time window of their involvement remains unknown. This study addressed this issue in three experiments using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We found that TMS applied over the VLPFC at 400 ms after negative emotional exposure significantly enhanced negative feelings compared to the vertex condition. Furthermore, TMS applied over the DLPFC at both 0 ms and 600 ms after negative emotional exposure also resulted in deteriorated negative feelings. These findings provide potential evidence for the VLPFC-dependent semantic processing (∼400 ms) and the DLPFC-dependent attentional and cognitive control (∼0/600 ms) in negative emotion processing. The asynchronous involvement of these frontal cortices not only deepens our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying negative emotion processing but also provides valuable temporal parameters for neurostimulation therapy targeting patients with mood disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:精神分裂症(SCZ)是一种具有复杂病理的严重精神疾病,包括谷氨酸系统的异常.谷氨酸通过兴奋性氨基酸转运蛋白(EAAT)从突触中迅速去除。在中枢神经系统(CNS)疾病(包括SCZ)的大脑中发现了主要谷氨酸转运蛋白EAAT2表达和定位的变化。我们假设被诊断为SCZ的受试者的额叶皮质中EAAT2的神经元表达和功能增加。
    方法:在SCZ受试者和年龄和性别匹配的非精神病对照的背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)的突触体制剂中测定了EAAT2蛋白表达和谷氨酸转运体功能。在来自DLPFC的神经元和星形胶质细胞的富集群体中测定EAAT2剪接变体转录物表达。对公开可用的转录组数据集进行通路分析以鉴定与不同细胞类型中的EAAT2扰动相关的生物学变化。
    结果:我们发现SCZ受试者与对照组相比,DLPFC中EAAT2蛋白表达或谷氨酸摄取没有显著变化(n=10/组)。EAAT2的转录表达和与EAAT2b运输相关的信号分子(CaMKIIa和DLG1)在SCZ(n=16/组)中的星形胶质细胞和锥体神经元的富集群体中显著改变(P<.05)。这些变化与抗精神病药物无关。通路分析还鉴定了与星形胶质细胞(免疫通路)和神经元(代谢通路)EAAT2表达的扰动相关的生物通路的细胞类型特异性富集。
    结论:总体而言,这些数据支持越来越多的证据表明谷氨酸系统失调在SCZ的病理生理学中的作用。
    BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a serious mental illness with complex pathology, including abnormalities in the glutamate system. Glutamate is rapidly removed from the synapse by excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs). Changes in the expression and localization of the primary glutamate transporter EAAT2 are found in the brain in central nervous system (CNS) disorders including SCZ. We hypothesize that neuronal expression and function of EAAT2 are increased in the frontal cortex in subjects diagnosed with SCZ.
    METHODS: EAAT2 protein expression and glutamate transporter function were assayed in synaptosome preparations from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) of SCZ subjects and age- and sex-matched nonpsychiatrically ill controls. EAAT2 splice variant transcript expression was assayed in enriched populations of neurons and astrocytes from the DLPFC. Pathway analysis of publicly available transcriptomic datasets was carried out to identify biological changes associated with EAAT2 perturbation in different cell types.
    RESULTS: We found no significant changes in EAAT2 protein expression or glutamate uptake in the DLPFC in SCZ subjects compared with controls (n = 10/group). Transcript expression of EAAT2 and signaling molecules associated with EAAT2b trafficking (CaMKIIa and DLG1) were significantly altered in enriched populations of astrocytes and pyramidal neurons (P < .05) in SCZ (n = 16/group). These changes were not associated with antipsychotic medications. Pathway analysis also identified cell-type-specific enrichment of biological pathways associated with perturbation of astrocyte (immune pathways) and neuronal (metabolic pathways) EAAT2 expression.
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these data support the growing body of evidence for the role of dysregulation of the glutamate system in the pathophysiology of SCZ.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近的工作表明,重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的前额叶功能障碍与社会压力引起的沉思有关。然而,迄今为止,尚不清楚MDD的病因可能导致前额叶功能障碍。在手头的研究中,我们的目标是复制最近的发现,与健康对照组相比,在Trier社会压力测试(TSST)期间显示前额叶激活改变,随后MDD中的应激反应性反潮增加。此外,我们旨在探讨不良童年经历和其他临床变量在这种关系中的作用.N=55名目前患有MDD的患者和n=42名健康对照(HC)接受TSST,而认知控制网络(CCN)区域的皮质活动是通过功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)测量的。TSST成功诱导了应激反应(生理上,以及主观压力等级)和所有中等至较大效应大小的受试者的状态反思。与HC相比,MDD患者表现出升高的状态反思性水平,具有较大的效应大小,以及在具有中等效应大小的CCN中应激期间皮质氧合减少的典型模式。自我报告的情感虐待和社交焦虑与压力反应性沉思增加呈中度正相关。在MDD示例中,在具有中等至较大效应大小的CCN中,情绪虐待与皮质氧合呈负相关,社交焦虑与皮质氧合呈正相关.总之,我们的结果重复了之前关于应激期间MDD相关前额叶活动不足的发现,并将研究扩展到特定的抑郁症亚型.
    Recent work showed an association of prefrontal dysfunctions in patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and social stress induced rumination. However, up to date it is unclear which etiological features of MDD might cause prefrontal dysfunctions. In the study at hand, we aimed to replicate recent findings, that showed prefrontal activation alterations during the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) and subsequently increased stress-reactive rumination in MDD compared to healthy controls. Moreover, we aimed to explore the role of adverse childhood experiences and other clinical variables in this relationship. N = 55 patients currently suffering from MDD and n = 42 healthy controls (HC) underwent the TSST, while cortical activity in areas of the Cognitive Control Network (CCN) was measured via functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). The TSST successfully induced a stress reaction (physiologically, as well as indicated by subjective stress ratings) and state rumination in all subjects with moderate to large effect sizes. In comparison to HC, MDD patients showed elevated levels of state rumination with large effect sizes, as well as a typical pattern of reduced cortical oxygenation during stress in the CCN with moderate effect sizes. Self-reported emotional abuse and social anxiety were moderately positively associated with increased stress-reactive rumination. Within the MDD sample, emotional abuse was negatively and social anxiety positively associated with cortical oxygenation within the CCN with moderate to large effect sizes. In conclusion, our results replicate previous findings on MDD-associated prefrontal hypoactivity during stress and extends the research toward specific subtypes of depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    用于缓解精神分裂症阴性症状和认知功能障碍的重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)通常靶向左背外侧前额叶皮质(LDLPFC)。然而,rTMS在这个部位的治疗效果仍然没有定论,而且越来越多,研究集中在小脑rTMS上。最近,长时间间歇性theta爆发刺激(iTBS)已成为rTMS的一种快速起效形式,具有良好的临床获益.这项研究探索了在健康队列中对LDLPFC和小脑施用延长iTBS的认知和神经生理作用。50名健康参与者参加了一项交叉研究,并接受了针对LDLPFC的长时间(1800个脉冲)iTBS,小脑疣,和假iTBS。混合效应重复测量模型检查了刺激后2回(P300,N200)和Stroop(N200,N450)任务的认知和事件相关电位(ERP)。探索性非参数基于聚类的置换检验比较了条件之间的ERP。2-back和Stroop任务的行为和ERP结果条件之间没有显着差异。ERPs的基于聚类的探索性置换检验未发现条件之间的任何显着差异。我们没有发现证据表明,与健康样本中的假手术相比,对LDLPFC或小脑进行一次长时间的iTBS可能会导致任何认知或ERP变化。
    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for alleviating negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia commonly targets the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC). However, the therapeutic effectiveness of rTMS at this site remains inconclusive and increasingly, studies are focusing on cerebellar rTMS. Recently, prolonged intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) has emerged as a rapid-acting form of rTMS with promising clinical benefits. This study explored the cognitive and neurophysiological effects of prolonged iTBS administered to the LDLPFC and cerebellum in a healthy cohort. 50 healthy participants took part in a cross-over study and received prolonged (1800 pulses) iTBS targeting the LDLPFC, cerebellar vermis, and sham iTBS. Mixed effects repeated measures models examined cognitive and event-related potentials (ERPs) from 2-back (P300, N200) and Stroop (N200, N450) tasks after stimulation. Exploratory non-parametric cluster-based permutation tests compared ERPs between conditions. There were no significant differences between conditions for behavioural and ERP outcomes on the 2-back and Stroop tasks. Exploratory cluster-based permutation tests of ERPs did not identify any significant differences between conditions. We did not find evidence that a single session of prolonged iTBS administered to either the LDLPFC or cerebellum could cause any cognitive or ERP changes compared to sham in a healthy sample.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于航空公司来说,深入了解飞行员衰老的认知影响至关重要。当前有关执行功能的文献表明,大脑中的代偿机制可能会抵消与年龄相关的认知能力下降,至少达到某些任务负载级别。然而,很少有研究来评估机组人员能力随年龄的变化。本研究的重点是背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)活动,因为它涉及认知表现和工作记忆,这与技能熟练程度有关。我们测量了航空公司飞行员的DLPFC活动,包括学员,在使用飞行模拟器的机动过程中。我们的初步结果表明,只有专家(老年)飞行员表现出左DLPFC的活性高于右DLPFC。然而,对青年学员来说,使用飞行模拟器时不仅错误率很高,但是DLFPC的活动也低于专家飞行员的活动,左右DLPFC比较差异无统计学意义。尽管这些发现与以前关于年龄相关变化的研究中报道的部分不同,显然,作为航空公司飞行员培训超过20年可能会影响这样的结果。我们相信,这种客观量化技能的非侵入性方法将有助于发展有效的衰老评估能力。
    It is essential for airlines to have a deep understanding of the cognitive impact of aging among pilots. The current literature on executive function indicates that compensatory mechanisms in the brain may counteract age-related cognitive decline, at least up to certain task load levels. However, few studies have been administered to evaluate changes in aircrew competence as they age. The present study focuses on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) activity as it is implicated in cognitive performance and working memory, which are associated with skill proficiency. We measured the DLPFC activity for airline pilots, including trainees, during maneuvering using a flight simulator. Our preliminary results indicated that only expert (aged) pilots demonstrated higher activity of the left DLPFC than the right one. However, for youth trainees, not only was the error rate high while using the flight simulator, but the activity of the DLFPC was also lower than that of the expert pilots, and there was no statistically significant difference between the left and right DLPFC. Although these findings partially differ from those reported in previous studies on age-related changes, it is evident that training as an airline pilot for over 20 years may affect such results. We believe that this noninvasive approach to objective quantification of skill will facilitate the development of effective assessment competence in aging.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号