Cross-reaction

交叉反应
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由SARS-CoV-2和脑膜炎球菌病引起的COVID-19,由脑膜炎奈瑟菌引起的,是相关的传染病,可通过疫苗预防。外膜囊泡(OMV),从革兰氏阴性细菌释放,比如脑膜炎奈瑟氏球菌,具有佐剂特征,并可能提供对脑膜炎球菌疾病的保护。这里,我们在小鼠中评估了由脑膜炎奈瑟球菌C:2a:P1.5OMV和氢氧化铝佐剂的SARS-CoV-2不同剂量的受体结合域(RBD)的体液和细胞免疫应答,作为这些病原体的联合制剂。免疫诱导对RBD和OMV具有高亲和力的IgG抗体,除了识别具有中间亲和力的SARS-CoV-2的OmicronBA.2变体的IgG。细胞免疫显示响应RBD和OMV刺激而分泌IFN-γ和IL-4,显示免疫记忆和混合的Th1/Th2反应。后代表现出与母亲相似水平和亲和力的转移IgG。体液免疫并没有指出任何RBD剂量的优越性,但是用较低抗原剂量(0.5μg)免疫的组具有更好的细胞反应。总的来说,OMV增强RBD免疫原性,并且也赋予针对脑膜炎奈瑟球菌的免疫应答。
    COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, and meningococcal disease, caused by Neisseria meningitidis, are relevant infectious diseases, preventable through vaccination. Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), released from Gram-negative bacteria, such as N. meningitidis, present adjuvant characteristics and may confer protection against meningococcal disease. Here, we evaluated in mice the humoral and cellular immune response to different doses of receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 adjuvanted by N. meningitidis C:2a:P1.5 OMVs and aluminum hydroxide, as a combined preparation for these pathogens. The immunization induced IgG antibodies of high avidity for RBD and OMVs, besides IgG that recognized the Omicron BA.2 variant of SARS-CoV-2 with intermediary avidity. Cellular immunity showed IFN-γ and IL-4 secretion in response to RBD and OMV stimuli, demonstrating immunologic memory and a mixed Th1/Th2 response. Offspring presented transferred IgG of similar levels and avidity as their mothers. Humoral immunity did not point to the superiority of any RBD dose, but the group immunized with a lower antigenic dose (0.5 μg) had the better cellular response. Overall, OMVs enhanced RBD immunogenicity and conferred an immune response directed to N. meningitidis too.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:猪带虫囊虫病的抗原检测证实了中间宿主(猪或人)中的可行感染。参考B158/B60单克隆抗体(mAb)为基础的Ag酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)在患有多发性脑囊肿的人神经囊虫病中具有可接受的灵敏度和特异性,尽管在单发脑囊肿的病例中,其敏感性较低,而在猪囊虫病中,检测特异性受到其与猪带虫的频繁交叉反应的影响,在猪身上发现的另一种常见的食宿。我们小组生产了21种抗T。对整个囊肿的抗原有反应的单克隆抗体,囊泡液体,和分泌/排泄产物,将TsW8/TsW5鉴定为用于Ag-ELISA的最有希望的mAb对。
    方法:我们报告了使用TsW8/TsW5Ag-ELISA测量从感染后第0天(基线)至第90天(PI)从实验感染了猪的猪(n=26)和猪(n=12)收集的两组血清中的囊尾蚴抗原水平[以光密度(OD)值表示]。在基线以及第28天和第90天,我们使用Bland-Altman(BA)分析和Lin的一致性相关系数(CCC)来确定TsW8/TsW5和B158/B60Ag-ELISA之间的一致性。
    结果:TsW8/TsW5Ag-ELISA能够有效地测量感染猪的循环抗原水平。与B158/B60Ag-ELISA获得的相似。在基线和第28天和第90天PI(92.3%,100%,100%,分别),并且还发现测定之间的log-OD高度一致(Lin'sCCC:分别为0.69、0.92和0.96,所有P<0.001)。在感染了包虫的猪身上,在BA分析中,几乎所有配对的log-OD差异都在LoA范围内,而测定之间的log-OD一致性在基线时较低(Lin'sCCC:0.24),但在第28天和第90天PI时增加(Lins'CCC:0.88和0.98,P<0.001)。
    结论:TsW8/TsW5Ag-ELISA可识别猪猪囊虫囊虫病中的抗原,与B158/B60Ag-ELISA高度一致。然而,它的诊断用途受到与包虫病的交叉反应的阻碍,与其他基于mAb的Ag-ELISA一样。
    BACKGROUND: Antigen detection in Taenia solium cysticercosis confirms viable infection in the intermediate host (either pig or human). The reference B158/B60 monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based Ag-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has acceptable levels of sensitivity and specificity in human neurocysticercosis with multiple brain cysts, although its sensitivity is lower in cases with single brain cysts, whereas in porcine cysticercosis the assay specificity is affected by its frequent cross-reaction with Taenia hydatigena, another common cestode found in pigs. Our group has produced 21 anti-T. solium mAbs reacting against antigens of the whole cyst, vesicular fluid, and secretory/excretory products, identifying TsW8/TsW5 as the most promising pair of mAbs for an Ag-ELISA.
    METHODS: We report the use of the TsW8/TsW5 Ag-ELISA to measure cysticercus antigen levels [expressed as optical density (OD) values] in two panels of sera collected from day 0 (baseline) to day 90 postinfection (PI) from pigs experimentally infected with T. solium (n = 26) and T. hydatigena (n = 12). At baseline and on days 28 and 90 PI, we used Bland-Altman (BA) analysis and Lin\'s concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) to determine the concordance between the TsW8/TsW5 and the B158/B60 Ag-ELISA.
    RESULTS: The TsW8/TsW5 Ag-ELISA was able to efficiently measure circulating antigen levels in T. solium-infected pigs, similar to that obtained with the B158/B60 Ag-ELISA. Almost all paired log-OD differences between assays were within the limits of agreement (LoA) in the BA analysis at baseline and on days 28 and 90 PI (92.3%, 100%, and 100%, respectively), and a high concordance of log-ODs between assays was also found (Lin\'s CCC: 0.69, 0.92, and 0.96, respectively, all P < 0.001). In pigs infected with T. hydatigena, almost all paired log-OD differences were within the LoA in the BA analysis, whereas the concordance of log-ODs between assays was low at baseline (Lin\'s CCC: 0.24) but increased on days 28 and 90 PI (Lins\' CCC: 0.88 and 0.98, P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The TsW8/TsW5 Ag-ELISA recognizes antigens in pigs with T. solium cysticercosis and is highly concordant with the B158/B60 Ag-ELISA. However, its diagnostic use is hampered by cross-reactions with T. hydatigena, as in other mAb-based Ag-ELISAs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在免疫学中,通常观察到抗原和抗体之间的交叉反应。先前的研究表明,各种单克隆抗体(mAb)可以识别与流感病毒相关的广谱表位。然而,现有的交叉反应理论不足以解释观察到的现象。本研究探索了H1-74mAb与三种肽的相互作用特性:两种天然肽,LVLWGIHHP和LPFQNI,来自H1N1流感病毒的血凝素(HA)抗原,和一个合成肽,WPFQNY。我们的发现表明H1-74mAb的互补决定区(CDR)包含五个抗原结合位点,含有8个来自轻链可变区的关键氨基酸残基和16个来自重链可变区的关键氨基酸残基。这些关键残基在结合位点内形成不同的疏水或亲水簇和官能团,通过氢键促进与抗原表位的相互作用,盐桥形成,和π-π堆叠。研究表明,抗体分子的形成导致CDR中结合基团和小单元的产生,允许抗体通过这些小单元和官能团的不同组合附着到各种抗原表位。抗体与抗原表位结合的这种独特能力为解释抗体交叉反应现象提供了新的分子基础。
    In immunology, cross-reaction between antigens and antibodies are commonly observed. Prior research has shown that various monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can recognize a broad spectrum of epitopes related to influenza viruses. However, existing theories on cross-reactions fall short in explaining the phenomena observed. This study explored the interaction characteristics of H1-74 mAb with three peptides: two natural peptides, LVLWGIHHP and LPFQNI, derived from the hemagglutinin (HA) antigen of the H1N1 influenza virus, and one synthetic peptide, WPFQNY. Our findings indicate that the complementarity-determining region (CDR) of H1-74 mAb comprised five antigen-binding sites, containing eight key amino acid residues from the light chain variable region and 16 from the heavy chain variable region. These critical residues formed distinct hydrophobic or hydrophilic clusters and functional groups within the binding sites, facilitating interaction with antigen epitopes through hydrogen bonding, salt bridge formation, and π-π stacking. The study revealed that the formation of the antibody molecule led to the creation of binding groups and small units in the CDR, allowing the antibody to attach to a variety of antigen epitopes through diverse combinations of these small units and functional groups. This unique ability of the antibody to bind with antigen epitopes provides a new molecular basis for explaining the phenomenon of antibody cross-reaction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    磺胺类药物,这是医院和门诊病人常用的药物,历史上与超敏反应的高发生率有关。据信与在其结构中含有该官能团的其他药物发生交叉反应的风险增加。然而,尚未确定磺胺类基团是超敏反应的唯一原因,因为非抗生素磺胺类与抗生素磺胺类不共享相同的辅助基团。因此,不同类型的磺胺类和磺胺类抗生素之间的交叉反应性没有明确证明,和过敏反应可能涉及其他机制。有关此主题的错误信息可能导致不适当使用替代抗生素,但疗效较低或不良反应较高,导致抗生素耐药性。在引入含有磺胺的新药时,对对磺胺类抗生素有过敏史的患者进行个性化和监测至关重要,并迅速处理任何不良反应。脱敏方案可能是一个可行的选择,患者谁特别受益于这些抗生素,特别是那些免疫抑制的人。本文提供了描述性书目审查,以更新有关磺胺过敏的信息,其患病率,管理,以及预防此类反应和优化药物治疗的建议,而不用这些药物。
    Sulfonamides, which are drugs commonly prescribed in hospital and outpatient settings, have historically been associated with a high incidence of hypersensitivity reactions. It is believed that there is an increased risk of cross-reactions with other drugs that contain this functional group in their structure. However, it has not been conclusively established that the sulfonamide group is the sole cause of hypersensitivity reactions, as non-antibiotic sulfonamides do not share the same accessory groups with antibiotic sulfonamides. Therefore, cross-reactivity between different types of sulfonamides and sulfonamide-type antibiotics is not clearly demonstrated, and allergic reactions may involve other mechanisms. Misinformation about this topic can lead to inappropriate use of alternative antibiotics with lower efficacy or higher adverse effects, contributing to antibiotic resistance. It is crucial to individualize and monitor patients with a history of allergies to sulfonamide-type antibiotics when introducing a new drug containing sulfa and manage any adverse reactions promptly. Desensitization protocols may be a viable option for patients who specifically benefit from these antibiotics, particularly those who are immunosuppressed. This article provides a descriptive bibliographic review to update information on sulfa allergy, its prevalence, management, and recommendations to prevent such reactions and optimize pharmacotherapy, without underusing these drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    近年来,食用昆虫的消费受到关注,并指出了与摄入它们相关的潜在过敏风险,尽管病例报告有限。一个3岁的男孩表现出立即的过敏反应,有打喷嚏的症状,鼻腔分泌物,咳嗽,摄入两个板球饼干后眼睑水肿。他以前吃过虾,但从未吃过可食用的昆虫。鉴于他没有过敏性疾病史,这种过敏的发作是出乎意料的。随后的点刺测试和口服食物挑战测试证实,两斑板球(Gryllusbimaculatus)是导致其症状的过敏原。IgE抑制试验表明,the明显抑制了蛾的特异性IgE水平,虾,和螨(翼状螨)。这一事件标志着患者一生中第一次出现过敏症状,它是一个重要的案例,突出了食用昆虫过敏的风险。昆虫中已知的过敏原包括原肌球蛋白和精氨酸激酶,这在节肢动物中很常见,但是也有其他过敏原的报道,提示交叉反应潜在的敏化。随着昆虫的消费变得越来越普遍,过敏病例的数量可能会增加,应考虑食品标签和预防措施。
    In recent years, the consumption of edible insects has gained attention, and the potential allergic risks associated with their ingestion have been pointed out, though there are limited case reports. A 3-year-old boy exhibited an immediate allergic reaction, showing symptoms of sneezing, nasal discharge, coughing, and eyelid edema after ingesting two cricket crackers. He had previously consumed shrimp but had never eaten edible insects. Given his lack of a history of allergic diseases, the onset of this allergy was unexpected. Subsequent prick tests and oral food challenge tests confirmed that the Two-spotted cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus) was the allergen responsible for his symptoms. The IgE inhibition test indicated that the cricket significantly suppressed the specific IgE levels for moth, shrimp, and mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus). This incident marked the first time in the patient\'s life that he exhibited allergic symptoms, and it serves as a significant case highlighting the risks of allergies from edible insects. Known allergens in insects include tropomyosin and arginine kinase, which are common in arthropods, but there are reports of other allergens as well, suggesting potential sensitization from cross-reactions. As the consumption of insects becomes more widespread, the number of allergic cases may increase, and food labeling and preventive measures should be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的重点是开发诊断查加斯病(CD)的准确免疫测定法,由于克氏锥虫和其他寄生虫之间的抗原相似性,这是一项具有挑战性的任务,导致交叉反应。为了应对这一挑战,合成嵌合重组克氏T.cruzi抗原(IBMP-8.1,IBMP-8.2,IBMP-8.3和IBMP-8.4)以增强特异性并降低测试中的交叉反应性。虽然这些抗原与利什曼病的交叉反应性最小,他们与其他锥虫虫感染的表现尚不清楚。这项研究旨在评估这些IBMP抗原在Crithidiasp患者中检测CD的诊断潜力。LVH-60A,一种与巴西内脏利什曼病样症状有关的寄生虫。这项研究涉及七个Cristidiasp。LVH-60A患者和3例婴儿利什曼原虫患者。结果表明,这些IBMP抗原表现出100%的敏感性,特异性范围从87.5%到100%,精度值在90%到100%之间。与Crithidiasp没有观察到交叉反应性。LVH-60A,只有一个婴儿乳杆菌阳性样本与IBMP-8.1的交叉反应性有限。这项研究表明,IBMP抗原提供了有希望的诊断性能,在克氏锥虫和其他锥虫流行的地区具有最小的交叉反应性。然而,进一步研究了更多的Cristidiasp。需要LVH-60A阳性样品来全面评估抗原交叉反应性。
    This study focuses on developing accurate immunoassays for diagnosing Chagas disease (CD), a challenging task due to antigenic similarities between Trypanosoma cruzi and other parasites, leading to cross-reactivity. To address this challenge, chimeric recombinant T. cruzi antigens (IBMP-8.1, IBMP-8.2, IBMP-8.3, and IBMP-8.4) were synthesized to enhance specificity and reduce cross-reactivity in tests. While these antigens showed minimal cross-reactivity with leishmaniasis, their performance with other trypanosomatid infections was unclear. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic potential of these IBMP antigens for detecting CD in patients with Crithidia sp. LVH-60A, a parasite linked to visceral leishmaniasis-like symptoms in Brazil. This study involved seven Crithidia sp. LVH-60A patients and three Leishmania infantum patients. The results indicated that these IBMP antigens displayed 100% sensitivity, with specificity ranging from 87.5% to 100%, and accuracy values between 90% and 100%. No cross-reactivity was observed with Crithidia sp. LVH-60A, and only one L. infantum-positive sample showed limited cross-reactivity with IBMP-8.1. This study suggests that IBMP antigens offer promising diagnostic performance, with minimal cross-reactivity in regions where T. cruzi and other trypanosomatids are prevalent. However, further research with a larger number of Crithidia sp. LVH-60A-positive samples is needed to comprehensively evaluate antigen cross-reactivity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨抗禽流感病毒(AIV)单克隆抗体(mAb)的生物学特性及AIV相关肾损伤的可能机制。用灭活的H5N1AIV免疫BALB/c小鼠制备单克隆抗体H5-32,确定了滴度和与其他流感病毒的交叉反应性。通过免疫组织化学分析单克隆抗体与正常人组织的反应性。免疫荧光和共聚焦激光扫描技术用于检测mAb与人肾皮质细胞之间的结合位点。和Western印迹用于检测结合片段的大小。免疫组织化学分析证实单克隆抗体H5-32与正常人肾组织交叉反应。在人类肾脏中,mAbH5-32定位于人肾小管上皮细胞的细胞质中,其结合片段大小约为43kDa。H5N1AIV似乎与人肾小管上皮细胞结合,这可能是AIV感染引起肾损伤的机制之一。
    To investigate the biological characteristics of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against avian influenza virus (AIV) and the possible mechanism of AIV-related kidney injury. BALB/c mice were immunized with inactivated H5N1 AIV to prepare monoclonal antibody H5-32, and its subtype, titer and cross-reactivity with other influenza viruses were identified. The reactivity of monoclonal antibody with normal human tissue was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Immunofluorescence and confocal laser scanning technique were used to detect the binding sites between mAb and human renal cortical cells, and Western blotting was used to detect the size of binding fragments. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed that monoclonal antibody H5-32 cross-reacted with normal human kidney tissue. In human kidney, mAb H5-32 was localized in the cytoplasm of human renal tubular epithelial cells, and its binding fragment size was about 43 kDa. H5N1 AIV appears to bind to human renal tubular epithelial cells, which may be one of the mechanisms of kidney injury caused by AIV infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非特异性脂质转移蛋白(nsLTPs)是一类植物泛过敏原,是地中海地区食物过敏的主要原因。具有广泛的临床表现,从完全没有症状到过敏反应。这种各种各样的症状与nsLTPs在特定受试者中引起过敏反应的内在能力有关,但也有共同因素的存在加剧(即,锻炼,NSAIDs,PPI,酒精,大麻,长时间禁食,月经,急性感染,睡眠剥夺,慢性荨麻疹)或保护免受(即对PR10,profilin或polcalcin的共敏感)严重反应。在这张照片中,认识到一些与nsLTPs相关的特性(即,路线,致敏剂的类型和数量,过敏原的浓度,交叉反应)和最终的辅助因素可能有助于过敏症医生定义单个患者的风险概况,为了促进从饮食建议到救生肾上腺素自动注射器的处方对过敏的适当管理。
    Non-specific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTPs) are a family of plant pan-allergens that represent the primary cause of food allergies in the Mediterranean area, characterized by a wide range of clinical manifestations, ranging from the total absence of symptoms up to anaphylaxis. This wide variety of symptoms is related to the intrinsic capacity of nsLTPs to cause an allergic reaction in a specific subject, but also to the presence of co-factors exacerbating (i.e., exercise, NSAIDs, PPIs, alcohol, cannabis, prolonged fasting, menstruation, acute infections, sleep deprivation, chronic urticaria) or protecting from (i.e., co-sensitization to PR10, profilin or polcalcin) severe reactions. In this picture, recognizing some nsLTPs-related peculiarities (i.e., route, type and number of sensitizations, concentration of the allergen, cross-reactions) and eventual co-factors may help the allergist to define the risk profile of the single patient, in order to promote the appropriate management of the allergy from dietary advices up to the prescription of life-saving epinephrine autoinjector.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由卵巴贝斯虫引起的绵羊巴贝斯病是一种经济上重要的疾病。最近,一些B.Ovis特异性蛋白质,包括重组卵黄芽孢杆菌分泌抗原-1(rBoSA1),已被确认。免疫学分析显示,rBoSA1位于受感染红细胞的细胞质内,并表现出检测抗B的强大抗原特性。Ovis抗体.这种蛋白质在寄生虫发育过程中释放到血液中。通过检测这种分泌蛋白可以诊断活动性感染。为此,本研究对rBoSA1特异性多克隆抗体夹心ELISA进行了优化.分析取自天然(n:100)和实验(n:15)感染的绵羊的血液样品中天然BoSA1的存在。结果显示在98%的天然感染动物中可检测到天然BoSA1。镜检寄生虫血症水平与夹心ELISA蛋白密度呈正相关。实验感染的动物从接种的第一天或第二天显示出阳性反应。然而,Rhipicephalus囊tick进行的实验性感染表明,从tick附着的第7天起,当开始在显微镜下观察到寄生虫时,就可以检测到天然的BoSA1。夹心ELISA足够灵敏以检测1.52ng/ml浓度的rBoSA1蛋白。此外,在感染各种pirosp质物种的动物之间没有观察到血清学交叉反应性,包括BabesiaBovis,B.bigemina,B.Caballi,B.canis,B.Gibsoni,Theileriaequi,还有T.annulata.集体采取,研究结果表明,基于rBoSA1特异性多克隆抗体的夹心ELISA可以成功地用于早期诊断绵羊的临床B.ovis感染。
    Ovine babesiosis caused by Babesia ovis is an economically significant disease. Recently, a few B. ovis-specific proteins, including recombinant B. ovis secreted antigen-1 (rBoSA1), have been identified. Immunological analyses revealed that rBoSA1 resides within the cytoplasm of infected erythrocytes and exhibits robust antigenic properties for detecting anti-B. ovis antibodies. This protein is released into the bloodstream during the parasite\'s development. It would be possible to diagnose active infections by detecting this secretory protein. For this purpose, a rBoSA1-specific polyclonal antibody-based sandwich ELISA was optimized in this study. Blood samples taken from the naturally (n: 100) and experimentally (n: 15) infected sheep were analyzed for the presence of native BoSA1. The results showed that native BoSA1 was detectable in 98% of naturally infected animals. There was a positive correlation between parasitemia level in microscopy and protein density in sandwich ELISA. Experimentally infected animals showed positive reactions from the first or second day of inoculations. However, experimental infections carried out by Rhipicephalus bursa ticks revealed the native BoSA1 was detectable from the 7th day of tick attachment when the parasite began to be seen microscopically. Sandwich ELISA was sensitive enough to detect rBoSA1 protein at a 1.52 ng/ml concentration. Additionally, no serological cross-reactivity was observed between animals infected with various piroplasm species, including Babesia bovis, B. bigemina, B. caballi, B. canis, B. gibsoni, Theileria equi, and T. annulata. Taken collectively, the findings show that the rBoSA1-specific polyclonal antibody-based sandwich ELISA can be successfully used to diagnose clinical B. ovis infections in sheep at the early stage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:\“蓝色风团\”和\“蓝色血管性水肿\”,有或没有过敏反应的蓝色染料注射剂的不良反应,定义不好。
    目的:目的是回顾特征(即,发病时的性别和年龄,蓝色染料注射和症状发作之间的间隔,临床表现,蓝囊或血管性水肿的持续时间),自然课程,和治疗蓝色染料的不良反应。
    方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析建议的首选报告项目,对截至2021年7月发表的文章进行了回顾。
    结果:共523例患者(175项研究)出现蓝色染料注射的任何不良反应,风浪,血管性水肿,或两者均发生在193例患者中(36.9%).在这193名患者中,68例患者(35.2%)出现蓝囊或血管性水肿,118(61.1%)有普通风团或血管性水肿(非蓝色),和7名(3.6%)。我们回顾了169例具有可用数据的患者(99例普通病变和70例蓝色病变)。专利蓝V的诱发蓝团或血管性水肿的发生率最高(OR=4.9)。几乎一半的蓝囊或血管性水肿患者出现全身症状;而那些有全身症状的患者,除一名外,所有患者均进展为过敏反应。按需治疗抗组胺药,皮质类固醇,和肾上腺素是常用和有效的。
    结论:使用蓝色染料可导致蓝团或血管性水肿和全身反应。对蓝色染料有严重过敏反应史的患者,只有在仔细权衡所有风险和益处后,才应重复使用蓝色染料。
    BACKGROUND: Blue wheals and blue angioedema, the adverse reactions to blue dye injections with or without anaphylaxis, are poorly defined.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective is to review the characteristics (ie, sex and age at onset, interval between blue dye injection and symptom onset, clinical manifestations, duration of blue wheals or angioedema), natural courses, and treatments of blue dye adverse reactions.
    METHODS: A review of the articles published through July 2021 was performed per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis recommendations.
    RESULTS: Across 523 patients (175 studies) with any adverse reactions to blue dye injections, wheals, angioedema, or both occurred in 193 patients (36.9%). Of these 193 patients, 68 patients (35.2%) developed blue wheals or angioedema, 118 (61.1%) had ordinary wheals or angioedema (nonbluish), and 7 had both (3.6%). We reviewed 169 patients with available data (99 with ordinary lesions and 70 with blue lesions). Patent blue violet had the highest rate of inducing blue wheals or angioedema (odds ratio 4.9). Almost half of the patients with blue wheals or angioedema developed systemic symptoms; and of those with systemic symptoms, all except 1 progressed to anaphylaxis. On-demand treatments with antihistamines, corticosteroids, and epinephrine were commonly used and effective.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using blue dyes can lead to blue wheals or angioedema and systemic reactions. In patients with a history of a severe allergic reaction to a blue dye, repeat administration of a blue dye should be used only after carefully weighing all the risks and benefits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号