Cranial Nerve Injuries

颅神经损伤
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    正颌手术越来越多地用于矫正面部畸形和牙齿咬合不正,以及增强面部美感。手术计划和执行方面的重大进步使其更广泛和更容易获得。然而,可能出现不利的结果或并发症,导致潜在的严重和长期的后果,比如脑神经损伤。本文综述了与正颌手术相关的颅神经并发症。我们在可用的数据库中进行了广泛的搜索,分析截至2023年9月30日发表的相关研究。两位作者根据其标题和摘要独立选择文章进行全文审查。符合条件的研究报告了接受正颌手术的个体的颅神经损伤。我们的发现强调了脑神经损伤的风险,其可能的机制,管理,和结果。外科医生必须保持警惕和知情,并在术前患者咨询期间传达此类信息。
    UNASSIGNED: Orthognathic surgery is increasingly utilized to correct facial deformities and dental malocclusions, as well as to enhance facial aesthetics. Significant advancements in surgical planning and execution have made it more widespread and accessible. However, unfavorable outcomes or complications can occur, leading to potentially severe and possibly long-term consequences, such as cranial nerve injuries. This literature review investigates the cranial nerve complications associated with orthognathic surgery. We conducted an extensive search across available databases, analyzing relevant studies published up to September 30, 2023. Two authors independently selected articles for full-text review based on their titles and abstracts. The eligible studies reported cranial nerve injuries in individuals who had undergone orthognathic surgery. Our findings highlight the risk of cranial nerve injuries, their possible mechanism, management, and outcomes. It is imperative for surgeons to remain vigilant and informed and to communicate such information during preoperative patient consultation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究显微外科治疗在恢复医源性口腔颌面外科干预引起的三叉神经损伤后完全感觉恢复方面的有效性。
    对对照试验的Cochrane中央登记册进行了详细搜索,Medline和Embase。纳入至少12个月随访的临床研究,并使用RobbinI评估工具评估偏倚风险。
    在搜索中确定了六项研究,其中包括227名患者。舌神经是最常见的损伤神经,其次是下牙槽神经。第三磨牙拔除是神经损伤最常见的原因,其次是根管治疗,病理切除,冠状动脉切除术,正颌手术,种植牙然后注射局部麻醉.总的来说,神经损伤的手术干预显示大多数患者术后神经感觉得到改善.
    当手术部位的张力最小时,直接神经吻合仍然是金标准技术。在传统修复或移植后的导管应用中已经注意到有希望的结果。需要进一步研究同种异体移植和导管在神经修复中的应用效果。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the effectiveness of the microsurgical treatment in restoring full sensory recovery following trigeminal nerve injuries caused by iatrogenic oral and maxillofacial surgical interventions.
    UNASSIGNED: A detailed search was conducted on the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, Medline and Embase. Clinical studies with at least twelve months of follow up were included and assessment of risks of bias was made using the Robbin I assessment tool.
    UNASSIGNED: Six studies were identified in the searches which include 227 patients. The lingual nerve was the most common injured nerve, followed by the inferior alveolar nerve. Third molar removal was the most frequent cause of nerve injury, followed by root canal treatment, pathology excision, coronectomy, orthognathic surgery, dental implants and then local anaesthetic injections. Overall, surgical interventions for nerve injuries showed neurosensory improvement postoperatively in the majority of patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Direct neurorrhaphy is still the gold-standard technique when the tension at the surgical site is minimal. Promising results have been noted on conduit applications following traditional repair or grafting. Further research is needed on the efficacy of allografting and conduit applications in nerve repair.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈动脉体副神经节瘤(CBP)是一种罕见的,高度血管化,和生长缓慢的神经内分泌肿瘤.手术切除是CBP的决定性治疗,然而,由于肿瘤靠近关键血管和颈神经,它仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在记录CBP的特征,并检查CBP手术切除后患者的临床结局。
    方法:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,分析了接受CBP摘除的患者。我们检查了病人的人口统计,术前临床特征,肿瘤特征,血清和尿液中儿茶酚胺及其代谢物的水平。由一名血管外科医生进行手术,并在1、3、6个月和此后每年进行随访。进行Logistic回归分析以确定与永久性或暂时性宫颈颅神经麻痹(CNP)发生相关的危险因素。
    结果:从2020年9月至2023年2月,本研究检查了19例患者中进行的21例CBP去除手术。患者的平均年龄为38.9±10.9岁,男性的百分比为57.1%(n=12)。术前最常见的临床特征是无痛性颈部肿块(n=12;57.1%)。20例完全切除;不包括1例经病理证实的硬化性副神经节瘤。4例进行了血管手术(ECA切除术,n=2;无颈动脉分流的ICA撕裂的初次修复,n=1;ICA补片血管成形术伴颈动脉分流,n=1)。暂时性颅神经并发症,特别是误吸和声音嘶哑发生在四个(19.0%),和三例(14.3%),分别。在2例(9.5%)中,与永久性CNP相关的声音嘶哑持续超过6个月。随访期间未见复发或死亡。
    结论:手术切除是CBP的首选治疗方法;然而,它会带来血管或宫颈CNP的风险。术中估计的失血是CNP的唯一确定的危险因素。
    BACKGROUND: Carotid body paraganglioma (CBP) is a rare, highly vascularized, and slow-growing neuroendocrine tumor. Surgical resection is the definitive treatment for CBP, however, it remains challenging due to the tumor\'s proximity to critical blood vessels and cervical cranial nerves. This study aimed to document the characteristics of CBP and examine the clinical outcomes of patients following surgical extirpation of CBP.
    METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective review analyzed patients who underwent CBP extirpation. We examined the patient demographics, preoperative clinical features, tumor characteristics, levels of catecholamines and their metabolites in the serum and urine. Surgeries were performed by one vascular surgeon with follow-ups at 1,3,6 months and yearly thereafter. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors associated with the occurrence of either permanent or temporary cervival cranial nerve palsy (CNP).
    RESULTS: From September 2020 to February 2023, this study examined 21 cases of CBP removal surgeries that were carried out in 19 patients. The mean age of the patients was 38.9 ± 10.9 years and the percentage of males was 57.1% (n = 12). The most common preoperative clinical feature was painless neck mass (n = 12; 57.1%). Complete resection was achieved in 20 cases; excluding one case with pathologically proven sclerosing paraganglioma. Vascular procedures were performed in four cases (ECA resection, n = 2; primary repair of ICA tear without carotid shunting, n = 1; and ICA patch angioplasty with carotid shunting, n = 1). Temporary cranial neurologic complications, specifically aspiration and hoarseness occurred in four (19.0%), and three (14.3%) cases, respectively. Hoarseness associated with permanent CNP persisted for more than 6 months in two cases (9.5%). No recurrence or mortality was observed during the follow-up period.
    CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection is the primay treatment approach for CBP; however, it poses risks of vascular or cervical CNP. The intraoperative estimated blood loss was the only identified risk factor for CNP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:乙状窦后入路经幕延伸(RTA)使我们能够解决后颅窝的病变,这些病变通过幕延伸到幕上空间。小脑幕上的切口很有挑战性,特别是对于颅神经(CN)IV损伤的风险。我们描述了一种幕状切口技术和相关的解剖标志。
    方法:在5个福尔马林固定(10面)上逐步进行RTA,注射乳胶的尸体头.三叉神经的中点,上动脉结节(SMT)基部的外侧边界,和小脑桥脑裂被评估为CNIV幕膜进入点的解剖标志,并收集相对测量值。临床病例介绍。
    结果:在4个不同的切口中描述了幕幕开口。第一个是弯曲的,从幕部的后部开始。它有2个肢体:一个指向幕部自由边缘的内侧肢体和一个向上岩窦(SPS)延伸的外侧肢体。第二个切口向下转动,中等,并平行于SPS向下到SMT。在这个层面上,第二个切口垂直转到帐篷的自由边缘,并结束于1厘米。第三个切口向后进行,平行于自由边缘。在桥小脑裂处,切口可以转向并切割无幕部边缘(第四切口)。平均而言,CNIV幕幕进入点位于SMT基底外侧边界前12.7mm和小脑桥脑裂前20.2mm。它与三叉神经的中点大致位于同一冠状平面,前平均1.9毫米。
    结论:SMT和小脑桥脑裂始终位于CNIV幕膜进入点的后方。它们可以用作RTA的手术标志,降低CNIV受伤的风险。
    OBJECTIVE: The retrosigmoid approach with transtentorial extension (RTA) allows us to address posterior cranial fossa pathologies that extend through the tentorium into the supratentorial space. Incision of the tentorium cerebelli is challenging, especially for the risk of injury of the cranial nerve (CN) IV. We describe a tentorial incision technique and relevant anatomic landmarks.
    METHODS: The RTA was performed stepwise on 5 formalin-fixed (10 sides), latex-injected cadaver heads. The porus trigeminus\'s midpoint, the lateral border of the suprameatal tubercle (SMT)\'s base, and cerebellopontine fissure were assessed as anatomic landmarks for the CN IV tentorial entry point, and relative measurements were collected. A clinical case was presented.
    RESULTS: The tentorial opening was described in 4 different incisions. The first is curved and starts in the posterior aspect of the tentorium. It has 2 limbs: a medial one directed toward the tentorium\'s free edge and a lateral one that extends toward the superior petrosal sinus (SPS). The second incision turns inferiorly, medially, and parallel to the SPS down to the SMT. At that level, the second incision turns perpendicular toward the tentorium\'s free edge and ends 1 cm from it. The third incision proceeds posteriorly, parallel to the free edge. At the cerebellopontine fissure, the incision can turn toward and cut the tentorium-free edge (fourth incision). On average, the CN IV tentorial entry point was 12.7 mm anterior to the SMT base\'s lateral border and 20.2 mm anterior to the cerebellopontine fissure. It was located approximately in the same coronal plane as the porus trigeminus\'s midpoint, on average 1.9 mm anterior.
    CONCLUSIONS: The SMT and the cerebellopontine fissure are consistently located posterior to the CN IV tentorial entry point. They can be used as surgical landmarks for RTA, reducing the risk of injury to the CN IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR)已被实践为颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和经股颈动脉支架置入术(TFCAS)的替代方法,特别是在高危患者中。最近,如果在SVS/血管质量计划(SVS/VQI)TCAR监测项目中进行,CMS扩大了TCAR在标准手术风险患者中的覆盖范围。一些注册研究(主要来自SVS/VQI)比较了TCAR与CEA或TFCAS的早期和长达一年的结果。没有大型单中心研究报告晚期临床结果。本研究将比较TCAR与CEA的中间临床结果。
    方法:本研究回顾性分析了在我们机构注册的TCAR监测项目患者的数据,并将其与相同提供者在同一时间段进行的CEA患者进行比较。主要结局是合并围手术期卒中/死亡和晚期卒中/死亡。次要结果包括合并卒中,死亡和MI,颅神经损伤(CNI),和出血。进行倾向匹配以分析结果。KaplanMyer分析用于评估卒中的自由度,中风/死亡,≥50%和≥80%再狭窄。
    结果:646例手术(637例患者)(404CEA,242TCAR)进行了分析。颈动脉介入的指征没有显着差异。然而,TCAR患者有更多的高风险标准,包括高血压,冠状动脉疾病,充血性心力衰竭,和肾衰竭。在围手术期30天的卒中中中,CEA与TCAR之间没有显着差异(1%对2%),卒中/死亡率(1%对3%,p=0.0849),或重大血肿(2%对2%)。CNI的发生率有显著差异(CEA为5%,TCAR为1%,p=0.0138)。在后期随访(2年),中风率为1%对4%(p=0.0273),中风/死亡8%对15%(p0.008),CEA患者与TCAR患者的再狭窄≥80%,分别为0.5%和3%(p0.0139)。在匹配242个CEA和242个TCAR之后,围手术期卒中发生率CEA为1%vsTCAR为2%(p=0.5037),卒中/死亡率为2%对3%(p=0.2423),CNI率为3%对1%(p=0.127)。在晚期随访时,中风的发生率为,CEA为1%,TCAR为4%(p=0.0615),中风/死亡,8%对15%(p=0.0345)。CEA≥80%再狭窄率为0.9%,TCAR为3%(p=0.099)。CEA与TCAR在6、12、18和24个月时的卒中自由率为:99%,99%,99%,99%和97%,95%,93%和93%;p=0.0806,中风/死亡:94%,90%,87%,86%对93%,87%,76%,和75%;p=0.0529,并且≥80%再狭窄:100%,99%,98%,98%和97%,95%,93%,和93%;p=0.1132。
    结论:在倾向匹配分析中,CEA和TCAR的围手术期临床结局相似.然而,在晚期卒中/死亡率方面,CEA优于TCAR,并且在2年时的再狭窄率≥80%,但无统计学意义。
    BACKGROUND: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has been practiced as an alternative for both carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting, specifically in high-risk patients. More recently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services expanded coverage for TCAR in standard surgical risk patients if done within the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative TCAR surveillance project. A few registry studies (primarily from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative) compared the early and up to 1-year outcomes of TCAR vs CEA or transfemoral carotid artery stenting. There is no large single-center study that reported late clinical outcomes. The present study compares intermediate clinical outcomes of TCAR vs CEA.
    METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed collected data from TCAR surveillance project patients enrolled in our institution and compare it with CEA patients done by the same providers at the same time period. The primary outcome was combined perioperative stroke/death and late stroke/death. Secondary outcomes included combined stroke, death, and myocardial infarction, cranial nerve injury (CNI), and bleeding. Propensity matching was done to analyze outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate freedom from stroke, stroke/death, and ≥50% and ≥80% restenosis.
    RESULTS: We analyzed 646 procedures (637 patients) (404 CEA, 242 TCAR). There was no significant difference in the indications for carotid intervention. However, TCAR patients had more high-risk criteria, including hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and renal failure. There was no significant differences between CEA vs TCAR in 30-day perioperative stroke (1% vs 2%), stroke/death rate (1% vs 3%; P = .0849), or major hematomas (2% vs 2%). The rate of CNI was significantly different (5% for CEA vs 1% for TCAR; P = .0138). At late follow-up (2 years), the rate of stroke was 1% vs 4% (P = .0273), stroke/death 8% vs 15% (P = .008), ≥80 % restenosis 0.5% vs 3% (P = .0139) for CEA patients vs TCAR patients, respectively. After matching 242 CEAs and 242 TCARs, the perioperative stroke rate was 1% for CEA vs 2% for TCAR (P = .5037), the stroke/death rate was 2% vs 3% (P = .2423), and the CNI rate was 3% vs 1% (P = .127). At late follow-up, rates of stroke were 1% for CEA vs 4% for TCAR (P = .0615) and stroke/death were 8% vs 15% (P = .0345). The rate of ≥80% restenosis was 0.9% for CEA vs 3% for TCAR (P = .099). The rates of freedom from stroke at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months for CEA vs TCAR were 99%, 99%, 99%, and 99% vs 97%, 95%, 93% and 93%, respectively (P = .0806); stroke/death were 94%, 90%, 87%, and 86% vs 93%, 87%, 76%, and 75%, respectively (P = .0529); and ≥80% restenosis were 100%, 99%, 98%, and 98% vs 97%, 95%, 93%, and 93%, respectively (P = .1132).
    CONCLUSIONS: In a propensity-matched analysis, both CEA and TCAR have similar perioperative clinical outcomes. However, CEA was superior to TCAR for the rates of late stroke/death and had a somewhat lower rate of ≥80% restenosis at 2 years, but this difference was not statistically significant.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    简介:涉及颞下颌关节(TMJ)的外科手术通常与神经损伤和随后的功能障碍有关。考虑到创伤性周围神经损伤可能会缓慢缓解,其预后通常是不可预测的,本研究旨在报道一个临床病例,其中通过光生物调节疗法(PBMT)有效治疗TMJ手术后的运动(影响面神经的颞部和骨分支)和感觉功能障碍(影响三叉神经的耳颞部神经).病例报告:PBMT会议,总共涉及30个面部点,每周两次,共10周。使用以下参数:808nm的波长,能量密度为75J/cm2,输出功率为100mW,总能量为3J,每点30秒的持续时间。面部不对称和肌肉功能在5周内都得到了相当大的改善,随着皮肤敏感性的全面恢复。到PBMT的第10周,面部运动功能障碍完全缓解。结论:根据目前的情况,PMBT似乎是治疗TMJ手术后运动和感觉神经功能障碍的有效干预措施。
    Introduction: Surgical procedures involving the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) are frequently associated with nerve injuries and subsequent dysfunctions. Considering that traumatic peripheral nerve injuries may resolve slowly and their prognosis is generally unpredictable, the current study aimed to report a clinical case in which both motor (affecting the temporal and zygomatic branches of the facial nerve) and sensory dysfunctions (affecting the auriculotemporal nerve of the trigeminal nerve) following TMJ surgery were effectively treated by using photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT). Case Report: PBMT sessions, involving a total of 30 facial points, were administered twice a week for 10 weeks. The following parameters were utilized: wavelength of 808 nm, energy density of 75 J/cm2, power output of 100 mW, total energy of 3 J, and duration of 30 seconds per point. A considerable improvement in both facial asymmetry and muscle function was achieved within 5 weeks, along with a total restoration of cutaneous sensitivity. By the 10th week of PBMT, the facial movement dysfunction was completely resolved. Conclusion: According to the current case, PMBT seems to be an effective intervention to manage motor and sensory nerve dysfunctions following TMJ surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Objective: To investigate clinical and imaging parameters to predict blood loss and cranial nerve injury (CNI) following carotid body paraganglioma (CBP) resection. Methods: A retrospective examination of clinical and imaging data was conducted on 63 patients who underwent CBP resection at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2016 to December 2022, including 23 males and 40 females, aged 26-87 years old. Three imaging parameters including tumor volume, the angle of contact with the internal carotid artery (ICA), and the distance to the base of skull (DTBOS) were gauged using the IMEDPACS software on CTA and MR imaging. The predictive efficacies of age, gender, Shamblin classification, and three imaging parameters for blood loss and CNI following surgery were analysed. Logistic composite parameter models were constructed and their predictive validity was assessed. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis underscored that only tumor volume (OR=1.381,95%CI:1.167-1.507,P=0.001) showed significant statistical correlations with blood loss following surgery. Area under curve (AUC) values of 0.910 for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed a sensitivity of 1.000 and a specificity of 0.694. Tumor volume (OR=1.126,95%CI:1.030-1.231, P=0.002) and DTBOS (OR=0.225,95%CI:0.081-0.630,P=0.005) were significantly associated with postoperative CNI. The analysis of logistic composite model showed AUC values for tumor volume, DTBOS and combination of the two parameters were 0.858, 0.788, and 0.872, respectively. The model for combination of tumor volume and DTBOS also proved superior in predicting postoperative CNI (Z=3.106, P<0.001), with a sensitivity of 0.833 and a specificity of 0.769. Conclusions: Tumor volume and DTBOS emerged as effective predictors for blood loss and/or CNI in patients with CBP resection. Moreover, the logistic composite parameter model outclassed single-parameter models in terms of their predictive clinical value.
    目的: 探讨利用术前临床及影像参数预测颈动脉体副神经节瘤(carotid body paraganglioma,CBP)术中出血量及术后颅神经损伤的临床价值。 方法: 回顾性分析2016年1月至2022年12月中南大学湘雅医院进行手术治疗的63例CBP患者的临床资料,其中男23例,女40例,年龄26~87岁。利用IMEDPACS软件对CT血管成像(CTA)与MRI进行测量,包括肿瘤体积、包裹颈内动脉角度及肿瘤上缘到颅底距离(distance to the base of skull,DTBOS)3种影像参数。分析比较年龄、性别、Shamblin分型、影像参数与术中出血量和颅神经损伤并发症的相关性及预测效能,构建联合参数预测模型并评价其效价。 结果: 多因素Logistic回归分析显示,对于术中出血量,仅肿瘤体积(OR=1.381,95%CI:1.167~1.507,P=0.001)有显著影响,绘制肿瘤体积单一参数的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.910,敏感度和特异度分别为1.000和0.694。对于术后颅神经损伤,肿瘤体积(OR=1.126,95%CI:1.030~1.231,P=0.002)及DTBOS(OR=0.225,95%CI:0.081~0.630,P=0.005)对其有显著影响;分别绘制这2种参数及联合参数模型的ROC曲线,AUC值分别为0.858、0.788和0.872,联合参数模型AUC值最高,其敏感度与特异度分别为0.833和0.769,差异有统计学意义(Z=3.106,P<0.001)。 结论: 肿瘤体积和DTBOS这2种参数,可有效预测CBP患者术中出血量和/或颅神经损伤并发症,联合参数的Logistic回归模型较单一参数具有更好的临床预测价值。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:在颅脑外伤患者中,颅神经损伤(CNI)的百分比范围为4.3%至17.6%,其中大多数是孤立的CNI[1-5]。在目前的文献中,通常研究中度至重度类型的头部损伤,这可能导致缺乏与轻度头部损伤(MHI)相关的CNI的代表性和描述.除了这种特殊的非血栓性和非瘘管的创伤性海绵窦综合征(CSS)外,本文旨在分析非严重颅脑损伤的创伤性CNI及其周围文献。
    方法:一名65岁的男子头部受轻伤,被发现CNI为III,IV和VI。脑成像显示散见性外伤性蛛网膜下腔出血和无移位的右骨弓骨折。尽管高剂量地塞米松的疗程很短,一年后,他的CNI仅部分恢复。
    结论:我们介绍了一例可能继发于MHI牵引损伤的创伤性CSS病例。从文献综述中发现眼外神经损伤是CNI最常见的组合之一。在MHI患者中,多重CNI不太常见。因此,应考虑为次要原因如肿瘤做准备。目前没有已知的与MHI相关的CNI的明确可识别模式。颅底骨折和脑神经麻痹早期发作的CT脑部表现通常与较差的预后相关。关于牵引CNI在非严重颅脑损伤中的研究还有待研究。
    BACKGROUND: In patients with traumatic head injuries, the percentage of cranial nerve injuries (CNI) range from4.3 to 17.6% in which majority are isolated CNI[1-5].In present literature, moderate to severe types of head injuries are often studied which may result in a lack of representation and description of CNI associated with minor head injuries (MHI). Alongside this peculiar case of a traumatic cavernous sinus syndrome (CSS) that is non-thrombotic and non-fistulous in nature, this paper aims to analyse traumatic CNI in non-severe head injuries and the surrounding literature.
    METHODS: A 65-year-old man who had sustained a minor head injury was found to have CNI of III, IV and VI.Brain imaging showed scattered traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage and a non-displaced right zygomatic arch fracture. Despite the short course of high dose dexamethasone, he showed only partial recovery of his CNI after one year.
    CONCLUSIONS: We present a case of traumatic CSS likely secondary to tractional injury from a MHI. Injury to the extraocular nerves wasfound to be one of the more commonly observed combination of CNI from the literature review conducted. In patients with MHI, multiple CNI is less common. Hence, consideration should be given to work upfor secondary causes such as tumours. There is presently no known clear identifiable pattern of CNI associated with MHI. CT brain findings of skull base fractures and early onset of cranial nerve palsies are generally associated with worse outcomes. More remains to be studied about tractional CNI in non-severe head injuries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    嵌合抗原受体(CAR-T)细胞疗法对血液系统癌症非常有效,但与免疫介导的副作用有关。包括神经毒性.免疫细胞介导的神经毒性综合征(ICANS)的最常见表现包括皮质症状,通常位于中枢神经系统。在这份报告中,我们介绍了一个在CAR-T细胞治疗后急性发作的双侧面神经麻痹患者,随后是完全的临床恢复。除了暂时的不适,他没有其他神经系统症状,也没有脑病或癫痫发作。MRI大脑无贡献,脑脊液显示淋巴细胞适度增加,无系统性白细胞增多,病毒研究均为阴性。他被诊断为CAR-T细胞疗法继发的双侧面神经麻痹,随后接受了一个疗程的类固醇治疗。演示后几周,他恢复了他的神经基线。CAR-T细胞介导的面神经麻痹的表现对临床和科学都有重要意义。病人,和研究人员。
    Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) cell therapy is highly effective against hematological cancers but is associated with immune mediated side effects, including neurotoxicity. The most commonly described presentations of immune cell mediated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) include cortical symptoms and generally localize to the central nervous system. In this report, we present a patient with acute onset of bilateral facial nerve palsy following CAR-T cell therapy, followed by a complete clinical recovery. Aside from a temporary anisocoria, he had no other neurologic symptoms and no encephalopathy or seizures. MRI Brain was non-contributory and cerebrospinal fluid revealed a modest increase in lymphocytes without systemic leukocytosis and viral studies were all negative. He was diagnosed with bilateral facial nerve palsy secondary to CAR-T cell therapy and subsequently treated with a course of steroids. Several weeks after presentation he returned to his neurological baseline. The presentation of CAR-T cell mediated facial nerve palsy is both clinically and scientifically relevant for physicians, patients, and researchers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    周围神经损伤损害患者的功能能力,包括那些发生在面神经的,这需要有效的医疗。因此,我们研究了异源纤维蛋白生物聚合物(HFB)在修复与光生物调节(PBM)相关的面神经颊支(BBFN)中的应用,使用低电平激光器(LLLT),分析对轴突的影响,面部肌肉,功能恢复。本实验研究将21只大鼠随机分为三组,每组7只,双侧使用BBFN(左神经用于LLLT):对照组-正常和激光(CGn和CGl);去神经支配组-正常和激光(DGn和DGl);实验修复组-正常和激光(ERGn和ERGl)。光生物调节方案在术后立即开始,并持续5周,每周一次。经过6周的实验,收集BBFN和口周肌肉。神经纤维直径(7.10±0.25µm和8.00±0.36µm)存在显着差异(p<0.05),分别)和轴突直径(3.31±0.19µm和4.07±0.27µm,分别)在ERGn和ERGl之间。在肌肉纤维区域,ERGl类似于GC。在功能分析中,ERGn和ERGI(4.38±0.10)和ERGI(4.56±0.11)显示正常性参数。我们表明,HFB和PBM对面神经颊支的形态和功能刺激有积极作用,是一种替代方法,有利于严重伤害的再生。
    Peripheral nerve injuries impair the patient\'s functional capacity, including those occurring in the facial nerve, which require effective medical treatment. Thus, we investigated the use of heterologous fibrin biopolymer (HFB) in the repair of the buccal branch of the facial nerve (BBFN) associated with photobiomodulation (PBM), using a low-level laser (LLLT), analyzing the effects on axons, muscles facials, and functional recovery. This experimental study used twenty-one rats randomly divided into three groups of seven animals, using the BBFN bilaterally (the left nerve was used for LLLT): Control group-normal and laser (CGn and CGl); Denervated group-normal and laser (DGn and DGl); Experimental Repair Group-normal and laser (ERGn and ERGl). The photobiomodulation protocol began in the immediate postoperative period and continued for 5 weeks with a weekly application. After 6 weeks of the experiment, the BBFN and the perioral muscles were collected. A significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed in nerve fiber diameter (7.10 ± 0.25 µm and 8.00 ± 0.36 µm, respectively) and axon diameter (3.31 ± 0.19 µm and 4.07 ± 0.27 µm, respectively) between ERGn and ERGl. In the area of muscle fibers, ERGl was similar to GC. In the functional analysis, the ERGn and the ERGI (4.38 ± 0.10) and the ERGI (4.56 ± 0.11) showed parameters of normality. We show that HFB and PBM had positive effects on the morphological and functional stimulation of the buccal branch of the facial nerve, being an alternative and favorable for the regeneration of severe injuries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号