Coronary flow reserve

冠状动脉血流储备
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    缺血性心脏病(IHD)影响美国超过2000万成年人。虽然传统上归因于心外膜冠状动脉的动脉粥样硬化,接受侵入性冠状动脉造影的稳定型心绞痛和IHD患者中,近一半没有阻塞性心外膜冠状动脉疾病.非阻塞性冠状动脉缺血通常是由具有潜在冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD)的微血管心绞痛引起的。更好地理解病理生理学,诊断,CMD的治疗有望改善缺血性心脏病患者的临床结局。
    Ischemic heart disease (IHD) affects more than 20 million adults in the United States. Although classically attributed to atherosclerosis of the epicardial coronary arteries, nearly half of patients with stable angina and IHD who undergo invasive coronary angiography do not have obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease. Ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries is frequently caused by microvascular angina with underlying coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Greater understanding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of CMD holds promise to improve clinical outcomes of patients with ischemic heart disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:冠状动脉微循环异常与患者预后不良有关,因此,本研究的目的是评估无功能性冠状动脉狭窄患者基底微血管阻力(b-IMR)的预后相关性.方法和结果:对226例接受冠状动脉内左前降支生理评估的患者进行分析,包括全因死亡和心力衰竭的主要终点,以及心血管死亡和动脉粥样硬化血管事件的次要终点。在2年的中位随访中,有12个(5.3%)主要终点和21个(9.3%)次要终点.主要终点的最佳b-IMR截止值是47.1U。Kaplan-Meier曲线分析显示,在b-IMR低于截止值的患者中,主要终点的无事件生存率较差(χ2=21.178,P<0.001)。b-IMR与次要终点无显著相关性(P=0.35)。低冠状动脉血流储备(CFR;<2.5)对两个终点都有预后价值(主要终点:χ2=11.401,P=0.001;次要终点:(χ2=6.015;P=0.014),高充血微血管阻力(≥25)仅与次要终点相关(χ2=4.420;P=0.036)。将b-IMR纳入包括CFR的临床模型可改善净重新分类指数和综合歧视改善,以预测主要终点(分别为P<0.001和P=0.034)。
    结论:b-IMR可能是无功能性冠状动脉狭窄患者死亡和心力衰竭风险的特异性标志物。
    BACKGROUND: Abnormal coronary microcirculation is linked to poor patient prognosis, so the aim of the present study was to assess the prognostic relevance of basal microvascular resistance (b-IMR) in patients without functional coronary stenosis.Methods and Results: Analyses of 226 patients who underwent intracoronary physiological assessment of the left anterior descending artery included primary endpoints of all-cause death and heart failure, as well as secondary endpoints of cardiovascular death and atherosclerotic vascular events. During a median follow-up of 2 years, there were 12 (5.3%) primary and 21 (9.3 %) secondary endpoints. The optimal b-IMR cutoff for the primary endpoints was 47.1 U. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated worse event-free survival of the primary endpoints in patients with a b-IMR below the cutoff (χ2=21.178, P<0.001). b-IMR was not significantly associated with the secondary endpoints (P=0.35). A low coronary flow reserve (CFR; <2.5) had prognostic value for both endpoints (primary endpoints: χ2=11.401, P=0.001; secondary endpoints: (χ2=6.015; P=0.014), and high hyperemic microvascular resistance (≥25) was associated only with the secondary endpoints (χ2=4.420; P=0.036). Incorporating b-IMR into a clinical model that included CFR improved the Net Reclassification Index and Integrated Discrimination Improvement for predicting the primary endpoints (P<0.001 and P=0.034, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: b-IMR may be a specific marker of the risk of death and heart failure in patients without functional coronary stenosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当前心脏移植受者的护理指南建议常规心内膜活检和侵入性冠状动脉造影作为监测急性排斥反应(AR)和冠状动脉同种异体血管病变(CAV)的基石。非侵入性工具,包括冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影和心脏磁共振,已经被引入到指导方针中,而没有自己作为黄金标准的作用。这些技术还具有造影剂相关肾损伤的风险。需要探索提供有价值的信息的非侵入性方法,同时将风险降至最低并允许其独立于患者合并症的应用。超声心动图检查可以在床边进行,连续重复,并且不承担造影剂相关肾损伤和手术相关风险的负担。它提供心脏形态和功能的全面评估。先进的超声心动图技术,包括多普勒组织成像和应变成像,可能是检测轻微心肌功能障碍的敏感工具,从而提供对AR和CAV的早期检测的见解。应力超声心动图可能为CAV的检测提供有价值的工具,而冠状动脉血流储备的评估可以揭示冠状动脉微血管损伤,并增加常规负荷超声心动图的预后价值。该综述强调了多普勒超声心动图在心脏移植随访中的作用,加权不同技术的优点和局限性。
    Current guidelines for the care of heart transplantation recipients recommend routine endomyocardial biopsy and invasive coronary angiography as the cornerstones in the surveillance for acute rejection (AR) and coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Non-invasive tools, including coronary computed tomography angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance, have been introduced into guidelines without roles of their own as gold standards. These techniques also carry the risk of contrast-related kidney injury. There is a need to explore non-invasive approaches providing valuable information while minimizing risks and allowing their application independently of patient comorbidities. Echocardiographic examination can be performed at bedside, serially repeated, and does not carry the burden of contrast-related kidney injury and procedure-related risk. It provides comprehensive assessment of cardiac morphology and function. Advanced echocardiography techniques, including Doppler tissue imaging and strain imaging, may be sensitive tools for the detection of minor myocardial dysfunction, thus providing insight into early detection of AR and CAV. Stress echocardiography may offer a valuable tool in the detection of CAV, while the assessment of coronary flow reserve can unravel coronary microvascular impairment and add prognostic value to conventional stress echocardiography. The review highlights the role of Doppler echocardiography in heart transplantation follow-up, weighting advantages and limitations of the different techniques.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    本系统评价通过超声心动图对左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)患者进行冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)评估的诊断和预后价值。已知会使冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的临床评估复杂化。文献检索在PubMed上进行,EMBASE,WebofScience,Scopus,和谷歌学者,截至2024年3月,以PRISMA标准为指导,并产生了6项符合纳入标准的观察性研究。这些研究涉及不同人群的LBBB患者,采用超声心动图方案阐明LBBB对冠状动脉血流动力学的影响。研究结果强调了CFR在LBBB患者心血管风险分层和指导临床决策中的重要性。汇总结果显示,患有LBBB和明显左前降支(LAD)动脉狭窄的患者的压力峰值舒张速度(MD=-19.03[-23.58;-14.48]cm/s;p<.0001)和CFR(MD=-.60[-.71;-.50];p<.0001),与没有明显LAD病变的患者相比,提示负荷超声心动图CFR评估在识别LBBB人群中有临床意义的CAD中的有效性。这篇综述强调了超声心动图CFR评估作为一种在存在LBBB的情况下评估CAD和分层风险的非侵入性工具的临床相关性,并强调了在CFR测量中需要标准化方案。
    This systematic review investigates the diagnostic and prognostic utility of coronary flow reserve (CFR) assessment through echocardiography in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), a condition known to complicate the clinical evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). The literature search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, was guided by PRISMA standards up to March 2024, and yielded six observational studies that met inclusion criteria. These studies involved a diverse population of patients with LBBB, employing echocardiographic protocols to clarify the impact of LBBB on coronary flow dynamics. The findings emphasize the importance of CFR in stratifying cardiovascular risk and guiding clinical decision-making in patients with LBBB. Pooled results reveal that patients with LBBB and significant left anterior descending (LAD) artery stenosis exhibited a marked decrease in stress-peak diastolic velocity (MD = -19.03 [-23.58; -14.48] cm/s; p < .0001) and CFR (MD = -.60 [-.71; -.50]; p < .0001), compared to those without significant LAD lesions, suggesting the efficacy of stress echocardiography CFR assessment in the identification of clinically significant CAD among the LBBB population. This review highlights the clinical relevance of echocardiography CFR assessment as a noninvasive tool for evaluating CAD and stratifying risk in the presence of LBBB and underscores the need for standardized protocols in CFR measurement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心血管疾病是自身免疫性风湿性疾病患者发病和死亡的主要原因。这在很大程度上可归因于导致冠状动脉粥样硬化和心肌炎的全身性炎症。心脏磁共振成像是评价心脏结构和功能的金标准,包括组织表征,可以检测心肌水肿,炎症,和纤维化。参数标测和冠状动脉血流储备测量技术的进步有可能改变诊断,风险分层,以及自身免疫性风湿性疾病患者的管理。我们提供了当前证据的概述,并建议在心脏风湿病领域的自身免疫性风湿性疾病患者中使用综合心脏磁共振的潜在未来作用。
    Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Much of this may be attributed to systemic inflammation resulting in coronary atherosclerosis and myocarditis. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for the evaluation of cardiac structure and function, including tissue characterization, which allows for detection of myocardial edema, inflammation, and fibrosis. Advances in parametric mapping and coronary flow reserve measurement techniques have the potential to change the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. We provide an overview of the current evidence and suggest potential future roles for the use of comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases in the field of cardio-rheumatology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD)可能是HIV中心肌疾病的潜在潜在机制。
    在没有心血管疾病(CVD)或糖尿病病史的HIV(PWH)患者中进行了经心率-血压乘积(CFRCOR)校正的冠状动脉血流储备的比较,没有艾滋病毒的人(PWOH),和患有糖尿病(PWDM)且没有已知的CVD或HIV病史的人。
    PWH(n=39,74%男性,55[7]岁,体重指数[BMI]32.3(26.8-34.9)kg/m2,抗逆转录病毒治疗持续时间13[5]年,CD4+计数754[598-961]细胞/μL)与PWOH相似(n=69,74%男性,55[8]岁,BMI32.2[25.6-36.5]kg/m2)和PWDM(n=63,63%男性,55[8]岁,BMI31.5[28.6-35.6]kg/m2)。CFRCOR在组间不同:PWOH2.76(2.37-3.36),PWH2.47(1.92-2.93),和PWDM2.31(1.98-2.84);总体P=.003。与PWH和PWOH(P=.04)以及PWDM和PWOH(P=.007)相比,CFRCOR降低,但与PWH和PWDM(P=.98)相比没有差异。总共31%的PWH的CFRCOR<2.0,这是CMD的关键截止值,相比之下,PWOH的比例为14%,PWDM的比例为27%。共有40%的感染HIV的女性CFRCOR<2.0,而没有感染HIV的女性为6%(P=0.02)。
    亚临床CMD存在于慢性感染和良好治疗的患者中,免疫控制的无症状PWH。这项研究表明,与PWOH相比,PWH中的CFR降低,与PWDM相当,进一步强调,良好治疗的HIV感染是CMD的CVD风险增强因素,类似于糖尿病。临床试验注册:NCT02740179。
    UNASSIGNED: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) could be a potential underlying mechanism for myocardial disease in HIV.
    UNASSIGNED: Comparisons of coronary flow reserve corrected for heart rate-blood pressure product (CFRCOR) were made among people with HIV (PWH) with no known history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or diabetes mellitus, persons without HIV (PWOH), and persons with diabetes (PWDM) and no known history of CVD or HIV.
    UNASSIGNED: PWH (n = 39, 74% male, age 55 [7] years, body mass index [BMI] 32.3 (26.8-34.9) kg/m2, duration of antiretroviral therapy 13 [5] years, CD4+ count 754 [598-961] cells/μL) were similar to PWOH (n = 69, 74% male, age 55 [8] years, BMI 32.2[25.6-36.5] kg/m2) and PWDM (n = 63, 63% male, age 55 [8] years, BMI 31.5 [28.6-35.6] kg/m2). CFRCOR was different among groups: PWOH 2.76 (2.37-3.36), PWH 2.47 (1.92-2.93), and PWDM 2.31 (1.98-2.84); overall P = .003. CFRCOR was reduced comparing PWH to PWOH (P = .04) and PWDM to PWOH (P = .007) but did not differ when comparing PWH to PWDM (P = .98). A total 31% of PWH had CFRCOR < 2.0, a critical cutoff for CMD, compared to 14% of PWOH and 27% with PWDM. A total 40% of women with HIV had a CFRCOR < 2.0 compared to 6% of women without HIV (P = .02).
    UNASSIGNED: Subclinical CMD is present among chronically infected and well-treated, asymptomatic PWH who are immunologically controlled. This study demonstrates CFR is reduced in PWH compared to PWOH and comparable to PWDM, further highlighting that well-treated HIV infection is a CVD-risk enhancing factor for CMD similar to diabetes. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02740179.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:通过血流储备分数(FFR)进行的有创功能评估被认为是评估中度冠状动脉狭窄的金标准。然而,在糖尿病患者中,由于动脉粥样硬化的加速进展,即使在功能测试阴性的情况下,结果也可能更差.
    方法:我们介绍一例因胸痛入院的55岁男性糖尿病患者。诊断性冠状动脉造影显示,钝角边缘分支有2个中间狭窄,先前植入的支架上没有再狭窄的证据。患者在保留FFR(0.88)的情况下接受了中度病变的侵入性功能测试,低冠状动脉血流储备(1.2)和非常高的微血管阻力指数(84)。由于侵入性功能参数的差异,光学相干断层扫描的血管内成像显示纤维化狭窄,没有薄层纤维粥样斑块的迹象。由于FFR保留且没有易损斑块的迹象,介入手术被推迟,患者继续接受最佳药物治疗.
    结论:糖尿病患者中度冠状动脉狭窄的联合功能和解剖成像代表了患者管理的综合当代决策途径。
    BACKGROUND: Invasive functional evaluation by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is considered as a gold standard for the evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis. However, in patients with diabetes due to accelerated progression of atherosclerosis the outcome may be worse even in the presence of negative functional testing.
    METHODS: We present a case of 55-year-old male diabetic patient who was admitted for chest pain. Diagnostic coronary angiography disclosed 2 intermediate stenoses of the obtuse marginal branch with no evidence of restenosis on previously implanted stent. Patient undergone invasive functional testing of intermediate lesion with preserved FFR (0.88), low coronary flow reserve (1.2) and very high index of microvascular resistance (84). Due to discrepancy in invasive functional parameters, intravascular imaging with optical coherence tomography showed fibrotic stenoses without signs of thin-sup fibroatheroma. Because of the preserved FFR and no signs of vulnerable plaque, the interventional procedure was deferred and the patient continued with optimal medications.
    CONCLUSIONS: Combined functional and anatomic imaging of intermediate coronary stenosis in diabetic patients represent comprehensive contemporary decision pathway in the management of the patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝移植(LT)候选心脏正电子发射断层扫描(PET)的数据有限,没有先前的研究考虑代谢不良的咖啡因减少应激灌注。
    方法:指示接受心脏休息/应激PET的连续LT候选者(n=114)戒除咖啡因2天,延长至5天和7天。由于在5天的咖啡因禁欲后可测量的血液咖啡因的持续高患病率,最初使用的双嘧达莫(n=41)改为多巴酚丁胺(n=73)。绝对流量的关联,冠状动脉血流储备(CFR),可检测血液中的咖啡因,和改良终末期肝病(MELD)评分的肝衰竭严重程度进行评估。将LT候选者的冠状动脉血流数据与非LT对照组进行了比较(双嘧达莫的n=102,对于多巴酚丁胺,n=29)结果:可检测到血液咖啡因的患者的患病率为63.3%,36.7%和2-后33.3%,5天和7天的咖啡因禁欲,分别。MELD评分与可检测的咖啡因相关(奇数比1.18,p<0.001)。在没有咖啡因的情况下,潘生丁压力下的CFR更高。含咖啡因(2.22±0.80vs.1.55±0.37,p=0.048),但低于多巴酚丁胺应力(2.22±0.80vs.2.82±1.02,p=0.026)。中介分析显示,双嘧达莫组CFR和MELD评分之间的显性关联源于咖啡因受损的CFR和肝衰竭/咖啡因相互作用。在双嘧达莫和多巴酚丁胺组中,LT候选人群的CFR均低于非LT对照人群。
    结论:我们证明,与多巴酚丁胺相比,在接受压力PET心肌灌注显像的LT候选患者中,可检测到的血液咖啡因的患病率异常高,导致双嘧达莫的CFR降低。LT候选物中咖啡因的延迟清除使多巴酚丁胺成为该人群中的首选应激剂。
    BACKGROUND: Data on cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) in liver transplantation (LT) candidates are limited with no prior study accounting for poorly metabolized caffeine reducing stress perfusion.
    METHODS: Consecutive LT candidates (n = 114) undergoing cardiac rest/stress PET were instructed to abstain from caffeine for 2 days extended to 5 and 7 days. Due to persistently high prevalence of measurable blood caffeine after 5-day caffeine abstinence, dipyridamole (n = 41) initially used was changed to dobutamine (n = 73). Associations of absolute flow, coronary flow reserve (CFR), detectable blood caffeine, and Modified End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score for liver failure severity were evaluated. Coronary flow data of LT candidates were compared to non-LT control group (n = 102 for dipyridamole, n = 29 for dobutamine).
    RESULTS: Prevalence of patients with detectable blood caffeine was 63.3%, 36.7% and 33.3% after 2-, 5- and 7-day of caffeine abstinence, respectively. MELD score was associated with detectable caffeine (odd ratio 1.18,P < 0.001). CFR was higher during dipyridamole stress without-caffeine versus with-caffeine (2.22 ± 0.80 vs 1.55 ± 0.37,P = 0.048) but lower than dobutamine stress (2.22 ± 0.80 vs 2.82 ± 1.02,P = 0.026). Mediation analysis suggested that the dominant association between CFR and MELD score in dipyridamole group derived from caffeine-impaired CFR and liver failure/caffeine interaction. CFR in LT candidates was lower than non-LT control population in both dipyridamole and dobutamine group.
    CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate exceptionally high prevalence of detectable blood caffeine in LT candidates undergoing stress PET myocardial perfusion imaging resulting in reduced CFR with dipyridamole compared to dobutamine. The delayed caffeine clearance in LT candidates makes dobutamine a preferred stress agent in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:微血管功能的最佳指标应针对微血管区室。然而,冠状动脉血流储备(CFR),尽管被广泛用于诊断冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD),受心外膜和微血管阻力的影响。相反,微血管阻力储备(MRR)调整血流储备分数(FFR),因此理论上与心外膜阻力无关。
    目的:我们检验了MRR,与CFR不同,不受心外膜阻力增加的影响,因此是更具体的微血管功能指标。
    方法:在16名接受近端左前降支支架置入术的患者中,我们创造了四个等级的人工狭窄(没有狭窄,温和,中度,和严重)使用冠状动脉血管成形术球囊在支架内充气到不同程度。对于每个狭窄等级,我们使用连续热稀释(每次64次测量)计算CFR和MRR,以评估它们对心外膜阻力变化的反应.
    结果:球囊扩张分级导致平均FFR显著依次下降(无狭窄:0.82±0.05;轻度:0.72±0.04;中度:0.61±0.05;重度:0.48±0.09,p<0.001)。这转化为平均高血冠状动脉流量的线性下降(无狭窄:170.5±66.8ml/min;轻度:149.8±58.8ml/min;中度:124.4±53.0ml/min;严重:94.0±45.2ml/min,p<0.001)。随着狭窄程度的增加,CFR呈线性下降(无狭窄:2.5±0.9;轻度:2.2±0.8;中度:1.8±0.7;重度:1.4±0.6),对应于FFR下降0.1的下降0.3(p<0.001)。相比之下,MRR在所有狭窄等级中均表现出可忽略不计的下降(无狭窄:3.0±1.0;轻度:3.0±1.0;中度:2.9±1.0;重度:2.8±1.0),对应于FFR下降0.1的仅0.05的下降(p<0.001)。
    结论:MRR,与CFR不同,受心外膜阻力的影响最小,因此应考虑更具体的微血管功能指标。这表明MRR还可以可靠地评估患有严重心外膜疾病的患者的微血管功能。
    BACKGROUND: The optimal index of microvascular function should be specific for the microvascular compartment. Yet, coronary flow reserve (CFR), despite being widely used to diagnose coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), is influenced by both epicardial and microvascular resistance. Conversely, microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) adjusts for fractional flow reserve (FFR), and thus is theoretically independent of epicardial resistance.
    OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that MRR, unlike CFR, is not influenced by increasing epicardial resistance, and thus is a more specific index of microvascular function.
    METHODS: In a cohort of 16 patients that had undergone proximal left anterior descending artery stenting, we created four grades of artificial stenosis (no stenosis, mild, moderate, and severe) using a coronary angioplasty balloon inflated to different degrees within the stent. For each stenosis grade, we calculated CFR and MRR using continuous thermodilution (64 measurements of each) in order to assess their response to changing epicardial resistance.
    RESULTS: Graded balloon inflation resulted in a significant sequential decrease in mean FFR (no stenosis: 0.82 ±0.05; mild: 0.72 ±0.04; moderate: 0.61 ±0.05; severe: 0.48 ±0.09, p<0.001). This translated into a linear decrease in mean hyperaemic coronary flow (no stenosis: 170.5 ±66.8 ml/min; mild: 149.8 ±58.8 ml/min; moderate: 124.4 ±53.0 ml/min; severe: 94.0 ±45.2 ml/min, p<0.001). CFR exhibited a marked linear decrease with increasing stenosis (no stenosis: 2.5 ±0.9; mild: 2.2 ±0.8; moderate: 1.8 ±0.7; severe: 1.4 ±0.6), corresponding to a decrease of 0.3 for a decrease in FFR of 0.1 (p<0.001). In contrast, MRR exhibited a negligible decrease across all stenosis grades (no stenosis: 3.0 ±1.0; mild: 3.0 ±1.0; moderate: 2.9 ±1.0; severe: 2.8 ±1.0), corresponding to a decrease of just 0.05 for a decrease in FFR of 0.1 (p<0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: MRR, unlike CFR, is minimally influenced by epicardial resistance, and thus should be considered the more specific index of microvascular function. This suggests that MRR can also reliably evaluate microvascular function in patients with significant epicardial disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:冠状动脉微血管功能障碍与ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后的不良预后相关。我们的目的是比较侵入性,基于多普勒导线的冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)与无创经胸多普勒超声心动图(TTDE)衍生的CFR,以及预测梗死面积的能力.方法:我们纳入了36例接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的STEMI后第3-7天进行有创多普勒导丝评估的患者,其中在侵入性多普勒6小时内测量了47条血管(29例患者)的TTDE衍生CFR。在中位时间为8个月时通过心脏磁共振评估梗死面积。结果:在整个队列中,侵入性和非侵入性CFR之间的相关性适中(rho0.400,p=0.005)。当仅考虑LAD动脉的测量时,它有所改善(rho0.554,p=0.002),在RCA动脉中没有显着相关性(rho-0.190,p=0.435)。侵入性(AUC0.888)和非侵入性(AUC0.868)CFR,在重新血管的罪犯动脉中测量,显示出预测梗死面积≥18%的左心室质量的良好能力,最佳截止值分别为1.85和1.80。结论:在STEMI患者中,TTDE和多普勒线推导的CFR表现出显著的相关性,当测量LAD动脉时,两者都与最终梗死面积有同样强的关联。
    Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with adverse prognosis after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to compare the invasive, Doppler wire-based coronary flow reserve (CFR) with the non-invasive transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE)-derived CFR, and their ability to predict infarct size. Methods: We included 36 patients with invasive Doppler wire assessment on days 3-7 after STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), of which TTDE-derived CFR was measured in 47 vessels (29 patients) within 6 h of the invasive Doppler. Infarct size was assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance at a median of 8 months. Results: The correlation between invasive and non-invasive CFR was modest in the overall cohort (rho 0.400, p = 0.005). It improved when only measurements in the LAD artery were considered (rho 0.554, p = 0.002), with no significant correlation in the RCA artery (rho -0.190, p = 0.435). Both invasive (AUC 0.888) and non-invasive (AUC 0.868) CFR, measured in the recanalized culprit artery, showed a good ability to predict infarct sizes ≥18% of the left ventricular mass, with the optimal cut off values of 1.85 and 1.80, respectively. Conclusions: In patients with STEMI, TTDE- and Doppler wire-derived CFR exhibit significant correlation, when measured in the LAD artery, and both have a similarly strong association with the final infarct size.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号