暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the timing of soft-tissue augmentation (STA) on mean buccal bone changes following immediate implant placement (IPP) in the anterior maxilla.
METHODS: Patients with a failing tooth and intact buccal bone wall in the anterior maxilla (15-25) were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Following single IIP and socket grafting, they were randomly allocated to the control group (immediate STA performed during the same surgical procedure) or the test group (delayed STA performed 3 months later). Implants were placed with a surgical guide and immediately restored with an implant-supported provisional crown. Changes in bone dimensions were assessed using superimposed CBCT images taken prior to surgery and at 1-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were registered at 1-year follow-up.
RESULTS: Twenty patients were randomized to each group (control: 16 females, 4 males, mean age 57.6; test: 9 females, 11 males, mean age 54.2). Ten patients in the control group and 13 patients in the test group had a thick bone wall phenotype. Estimated marginal mean horizontal buccal bone loss at 1 mm below the implant shoulder was -0.553 and -0.898 mm for the control and test group, respectively. The estimated mean difference of 0.344 mm in favour of the control group was not significant (95% CI: -0.415 to 1.104; p = 0.363). Also at all other horizontal and vertical levels, no significant differences could be observed between the groups. The combination of socket grafting and STA enabled counteraction of any buccal soft-tissue loss (≥ 0 mm) at 1 mm below the implant shoulder in 82% of the patients in the control group and in 75% of the patients in the test group (p = 1.000). The clinical outcome was favourable in both groups, yet implants in the control group demonstrated slightly less marginal bone loss (median difference 0.20 mm; 95% CI: 0.00-0.44; p = 0.028).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an intact and mainly thick buccal bone wall in the anterior maxilla, the timing of STA following IIP had no significant impact on mean buccal bone loss.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05537545.

UNASSIGNED: The study aims to assess the clinical efficacy of periosteal pedicle graft (PPG) as a barrier membrane in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) for gingival recession, intrabony, and furcation defects.
UNASSIGNED: Electronic and hand searches were performed to identify randomized controlled/clinical trials investigating GTR using PPG, with 6-month follow-up. Primary outcomes recorded: probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bone fill, recession depth (RD) reduction, percentage of mean root coverage, keratinized tissue width (KTW), and bone defect area (BDA).
UNASSIGNED: Thirteen articles were selected; 6 for recession, 2 for furcation, and 5 for intrabony. Meta-analysis was performed whenever possible, results expressed as pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs). In recession defects, the RD pooled SMD is 0.47 (95% confidence interval (CI) = [-0.50-1.44]), KTW pooled SMD is 1.30 (95% CI = [-0.30-2.91]), favoring PPG over the comparator. In furcation defects, PD pooled SMD is 1.12 (95% CI = [-2.77-0.52]), CAL pooled SMD is 0.71 (95% CI = [-1.09-2.50]), and bone fill pooled SMD is 0.67 (95% CI = [-3.34-4.69]) favoring PPG. In intrabony defects, PD pooled SMD is 0.54 (95% CI = [-2.12-1.04]), CAL pooled SMD is 0.23 (95% CI = [-1.13-0.68]), and BDA pooled SMD is 0.37 (95% CI = [-1.58-2.31]) favoring PPG. The results were not statistically significant.
UNASSIGNED: The current evidence indicates that PPG constitutes a valid and reliable alternative to collagen barrier membranes for successful GTR.

Soft and hard tissue deficiencies around dental implants which can potentially compromise implant survival are commonly encountered. Complicated interventions are often required to address and resolve combinations of soft and hard tissue defects. This case report describes the management of peri-implant soft tissue fenestration accompanied by bony dehiscence associated with intrabony defect through soft tissue modification. A 51-year-old female was referred to the Periodontics and Oral Medicine Clinic with labial soft tissue fenestration at the maxillary left canine implant-supported crown. The patient complained of discomfort and malodor at the implant site. The implant showed mucosal fenestration and 6 mm probing depth (PD) with profuse bleeding at the distolabial site without mobility. A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) demonstrated labial bony dehiscence associated with a 5.56-mm intrabony defect at mesial and distal surfaces. The implant was diagnosed as peri-implantitis with soft tissue deficiency. The treatment comprised oral hygiene instruction, debridement of the implant and all natural teeth, and mucogingival surgery with free connective tissue graft by the envelope technique. Two weeks after debridement, the mucosal margin of the implant disappeared, presenting soft tissue dehiscence of 4 × 4 mm. Mucogingival surgery was performed 3 weeks later. A 2-year follow-up revealed a stable mucosal margin with PD ranged 2-4 mm. In conclusion, modification of the soft tissue thickness around the implant together with excellent plaque control by the patient successfully maintained peri-implant health.

Background and objectives Mucogingival plastic surgery is a surgical procedure performed to prevent or correct anatomical, developmental, or traumatic defects. The problem of gingival recession is common in dental practice, causing pain and dentin hypersensitivity for the patient, and remains difficult to treat surgically at the second surgical site used to harvest the connective graft. Many alternatives have been used to replace connective grafts, but none have been as effective. The importance of guided tissue regeneration remains to gain attachment because it means the formation of new periodontal tissue. This study aims to evaluate the attachment gain (AG) obtained after the management of single gingival recessions of Class I and Class II of Miller\'s classification. Material and methods This study was designed as a clinical randomized trial using a split-mouth technique. The study sample included 15 patients (30 symmetrical gingival recessions). The first group included the coronally advanced flap (CAF) with the connective tissue graft (CTG), and the second group included the CAF with the Xenogeneic Acellular Dermal Matrix (XDM) (Mucoderm®, Botiss Biomaterials, Zossen, Germany). AG was measured at baseline and after six months. Results The results showed that the mean relative attachment level at baseline was 8.333±0.899 in the CTG+CAF group and 8.466±0.833 in the XDM+CAF group. After six months of follow-up, the levels remained 8.333±0.899 in the CTG+CAF group and 8.466±0.833 in the XDM+CAF group, with a significant difference between the study groups after six months. Conclusion The current study concluded that both grafts applied with the coronally advanced flap led to a gain in attachment, with a greater gain in the CTG group.

We report the successful treatment of multiple recession type (RT) 3 gingival recessions in periodontally compromised mandibular anterior teeth with limited keratinized tissue. A 35-yearold man with stage III, grade C periodontitis underwent a two-stage intervention. Initially, a modification of the connective tissue graft (m-CTG) wall technique was used as part of phenotype modification therapy. The CTG acted as a protective \'wall,\' securing space for periodontal regeneration, enhancing root coverage, soft tissue thickness, and keratinized mucosal width. Recombinant human fibroblast growth factor-2 and carbonate apatite promoted periodontal regeneration. This procedure successfully facilitated periodontal regeneration, resulting in the transition from RT3 to RT2 gingival recession and adequate keratinized mucosal width. Eighteen months later, the second surgery used a tunneled coronally advanced flap (TCAF) for root coverage. TCAF involved combining a coronally advanced flap and tunnel technique by elevating the trapezoidal surgical papilla and using a de-epithelialized CTG inserted beneath the tunneled flap. Root conditioning with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and enamel matrix derivative gel application were performed. Consequently, mean CAL gain was 5.3 mm, mean root coverage was 4.5 mm in height, and the gingival phenotype improved at the treated sites by the 12-month follow-up. This staged approach addresses the challenges of treating RT3 gingival recession with promising outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) or ubiquinone is one of a cell\'s most important electron carriers during oxidative phosphorylation and many other cellular processes. As a strong anti-oxidant with further anti-inflammatory effects CoQ10 is of potential therapeutical value. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to investigate the effect of topical CoQ10 on early wound healing after recession coverage surgery using the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) and palatal connective tissue graft (CTG).
METHODS: Thirty patients with buccal gingival recessions were evaluated after being randomly allocated to: 1) MCAT and CTG with topical application of a coenzyme Q10 spray for 21 days or 2) MCAT and CTG with placebo spray. Wound healing was evaluated by the early wound healing index (EHI). Patient-reported pain was analyzed by a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) at day 2, 7, 14 and 21 post-surgically. Mean recession coverage, gain of keratinized tissue and esthetic outcomes were assessed at 6 months.
RESULTS: EHI and pain scores showed no significant differences. Time to recovery defined as VAS<10 mm was shorter in the test group. Mean root coverage after 6 months was 84.62 ± 26.57% and 72.19 ± 26.30% for test and placebo, p=0.052. Complete root coverage was obtained in 9 (60%) test and in 2 (13.3%) placebo patients. Increase in keratinized tissue width and esthetical outcomes were similar for both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: CoQ10 had no significant effect on early wound healing and on mean root coverage after 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Early wound healing: in young healthy patients with no inflammatory oral conditions topical CoQ10 does not improve early healing.

Objectives To assess changes in gingival thickness (GTH) and the width of keratinized gingival tissue (KTW) following treatment with either connective tissue graft (CTG) or an albumin gel-platelet-rich fibrin mixture (Alb-PRF). Materials and methods Twenty treatment sites were included in a split-mouth design involving 10 patients with a thin gingival phenotype in the mandibular anterior region. The sample was randomly divided into two groups, with the Alb-PRF applied to the experimental group and CTG used for the control group. GTH and KTW were measured at baseline and after one, three, and six months. Results GTH increased in both groups during all follow-up periods. However, no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) between the groups were observed at baseline and six months. At three months, the experimental group exhibited significantly higher GTH (p < 0.001). Additionally, at three and six months, the CTG group showed a superior increase in KTW (p < 0.05). Conclusion Within the constraints of this study, Alb-PRF application for modifying thin gingival phenotypes proved to be an effective therapeutic option, potentially serving as an alternative to CTGs. Although Alb-PRF resulted in thicker gingiva, CTG demonstrated a greater enhancement in KTW.

BACKGROUND: The stability of soft tissue volume around dental implants is an important factor for the final esthetic outcome. The main objective of this study was to compare volume stable collagen matrix (VCMX) versus connective tissue graft (CTG) in the augmentation of soft tissue profiles in single implant sites with a class I Siebert ridge defect.
METHODS: Twenty patients (14 females and 6 males) were enrolled in the present study. After implant placement and augmentation of the buccal defect by VCMX or CTG, post-operative evaluation of the volumetric changes at the augmented implant site was carried out at 3, 6, and 9 months as primary outcome, clinical and radiographic soft tissue thickness were carried out at baseline and 9-month intervals, visual analog scale (VAS) and oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP14) were recorded 2 weeks after the surgery.
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in soft tissue volume was found between baseline and 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively in both groups with the highest value at 9 months (136.33 ± 86.80) (mm3) in VCMX and (186.38 ± 57.52) (mm3) in CTG. Soft tissue thickness was significantly increased in both groups at 9 months in comparison to baseline. However, there was a significantly higher increase in soft tissue thickness at 9 months in CTG (3.87 ± 0.91) than in VCMX (2.94 ± 0.31). Regarding the radiographic soft tissue thickness, there was a statistically significant increase in both groups at 9 months in comparison to baseline. However, there was a statistically higher increase in the radiographic soft tissue thickness at 9 months in CTG (3.08 ± 0.97) than in VCMX (2.37 ± 0.29). VAS showed a statistically lower value in VCMX (0.4 ± 0.7) than CTG (2.8 ± 1.48). The OHIP recorded lower values in the VCMX group than the CTG group with no statistical significance. In addition, there was no difference in the PES between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that CTG and VCMX were both effective in soft tissue augmentation around implants in the esthetic zone. However, CTG proved more efficient in increasing peri-implant soft tissue volume and mucosal thickness around single implants at a 9-month follow-up period. VCMX was associated with less pain or discomfort and reduced patient morbidity, as reflected by the significantly reduced VAS value in the VCMX group.

OBJECTIVE: To assess ultrasonographic tissue elasticity at teeth and implant sites and its variation after peri-implant soft tissue augmentation with a connective tissue graft (CTG).
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients, each contributing with one clinically healthy dental implant exhibiting a soft tissue dehiscence (PSTD), were included. Implant sites were augmented with CTG and monitored over 12 months. Ultrasonographic strain elastography, expressed as strain ratios (SR1, SR2, and SR3, respectively) was assessed at baseline, 6-, and 12-month, and compared with the corresponding contralateral homologous natural tooth. SR1 assessed the strain/elasticity of the midfacial coronal portion of the soft tissue in comparison to the natural tooth crown/implant-supported crown, SR2 evaluated the strain of the midfacial coronal soft tissue in relation to the one of the alveolar mucosa, while SR3 depicted the strain of the midfacial soft tissue in relation to the interproximal soft tissue on the transverse ultrasound scan.
RESULTS: SR1 in natural dentition and at implant sites was 0.20 ± 0.08 and 0.30 ± 0.14, respectively (p = .002), indicating that the coronal portion of the soft tissue around teeth is generally more elastic than its counterpart around dental implants. Soft tissue augmentation with CTG promoted an increased stiffness of the midfacial coronal portion of the soft tissue over 12 months (p < .001 for SR1, SR2, and SR3). Strain ratios at the 12-month time points were significantly higher than the values observed at 6 months (p < .001). Regression analysis demonstrated that strain elastography ratios in natural dentition were significantly associated with keratinized gingiva width, and gingival thickness. At implant sites, SR1 was significantly associated with keratinized mucosa width and mucosal thickness (p < .001 for both correlations), SR2 was significantly associated with keratinized mucosa width (p = .013), and SR3 was significantly associated with the surgical technique performed in combination with CTG (p = .022).
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound strain elastography captures and quantifies tissue elasticity and its changes after soft tissue augmentation. A different baseline tissue elasticity was observed between teeth and dental implants in the most coronal aspect of the soft tissue. The main factors affecting tissue elasticity-related outcomes were the keratinized tissue width, and mucosal thickness.