Complicity

共谋
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    化石燃料公司持有巨大的政治,经济,和知识生产能力。最近,行业运营商已经从推动气候否认主义转向旨在将气候危机责任个性化的运动。在本文中,在非常规石油和天然气(UOG)生产的背景下,我们关注这种努力的一个相关结果-人们的共谋经验。我们问:动员的激进主义者如何体验化石燃料的替罪羊,andwhatdoesitmeanfortheirgoalsastheyorganizedagainstUOGproduction?WeshowthatevenactivitiesfightingUOGproductionfeelcompleicitincomeinposelfuelproduction,这些同谋的感觉减少了他们对UOG问责制的要求。我们认为,这些结果在像美国这样的文化背景下尤其有害,在新自由主义意识形态正常化的地方,以个人责任为中心,个性化,以及作为消费者而不是公民的身份。我们整理了一个广泛的定性数据集,并提出了一种共谋理论,以此来理解:a)社会运动如何与新自由主义化的生活模式相交;b)共谋的经历如何影响激进主义;c)这可能如何有助于化石燃料公司削弱组织的目标。最后,我们研究了一组积极分子如何拆除这种共谋叙事。
    Fossil fuel companies hold enormous political, economic, and knowledge production power. Recently, industry operators have pivoted from pushing climate denialism to campaigns aimed at individualizing responsibility for climate crisis. In this paper, we focus on one related outcome of such efforts - people\'s experiences of complicity - here in the context of unconventional oil and gas (UOG) production. We ask: How do mobilized activists experience fossil fuel scapegoating, and what does it mean for their goals as they organize against UOG production? We show that even activists fighting UOG production feel complicit in fossil fuel production, and these feelings of complicity diminish their demands for UOG accountability. We argue that these outcomes have been especially pernicious in cultural contexts like that of the United States, where neoliberal ideologies are normalized, centering personal responsibility, individualization, and identification as consumers rather than citizens. We marshal an extensive qualitative dataset and advance a theory of complicity as a way to understand: a) how social movements intersect with neoliberalized patterns of life; b) how experiences of complicity affect activism; and c) how this may contribute to fossil fuel firms\' goals of undercutting organizing. We end by examining how a sub-set of activists works to dismantle this complicity narrative.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    监禁有时可能是一种合理的惩罚形式。然而,美国的监狱系统却面临着令人震惊的正义问题-谁被关进监狱,如何对待被监禁的人,以及下游的个人和社区健康影响。在监狱和监狱工作的医务人员为高度脆弱和服务不足的患者承担着危险的工作。他们的专业承诺值得称赞。但同时,监狱护理削弱了医务人员坚持自己专业标准的能力,有时甚至无法提供基本的健康保护。监狱中的医生被困在对弱势患者的承诺与要求他们参与维护宪法合宪性的系统之间。监狱中的医学道德受到损害,这个问题值得我们注意。
    Imprisonment may sometimes be a justified form of punishment. Yet the U.S. carceral system suffers from appalling problems of justice-in who is put into prisons, in how imprisoned people are treated, and in downstream personal and community health impacts. Medical personnel working in prisons and jails take on risky work for highly vulnerable and underserved patients. They are to be lauded for their professional commitments. Yet at the same time, prison care undercuts the ability of medical personnel to uphold their own professional standards and sometimes fails in even basic health protection. Doctors in prisons are stuck between their commitment to vulnerable patients and complicity in a system that requires their participation to uphold its constitutionality. Medical ethics is frayed in prisons, and the problem deserves our attention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Chater&Loewenstein对行为科学和公共政策如何与公司共谋,将公共卫生和社会问题归咎于个人弱点提出了尖锐的批评,从而使支持远离系统性改革。然而,他们的分析没有从一个重要方面来解释这个领域:它对人类非理性和弱点的关注。
    Chater & Loewenstein offer an incisive criticism of how behavioral sciences and public policy have become complicit with corporations in blaming public health and societal problems on individual weaknesses, thus deflecting support away from systemic reforms. However, their analysis stops short of holding the field to account in one important respect: its preoccupation with human irrationality and weakness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在二十一世纪,来自中欧和东欧的文献以描绘纳粹共谋的纪实小说的繁荣为标志,苏联恐怖,或20世纪大规模暴力和极权主义的其他实例。因为理解过去是现在的要求,繁荣引发了一个问题:为什么现在对过去的复杂性感兴趣?我的假设是,这些文本解决了参与过去的大规模暴力行为与当前参与新自由主义不法行为的形式之间的融合。虽然这些问题有很大的不同,它们是相关的:结构上,两者都提出了形成细致入微的参与概念的挑战。历史上,它们是相关的,因为过去参与的理由已经建立了术语,叙事,和启发式的恐怖,镇压,随后讨论了大规模暴力,从而形成了谈判当前有问题的参与的框架。方法:批判性语篇分析用于审查共谋的法律概念,并将其与四个文学文本中的段落的密切阅读相结合,以概述对语言互惠的关注如何增强我们对有问题的参与的理解。结果:历史共谋的文学刻画是矛盾的;它们可以帮助找到理解文化记忆中当前问题的模型,但它们也可以用来建立现在和过去之间的距离,以安抚一切都不太好的感觉,即使在纳粹和苏联的恐怖灭亡之后.本文概述了两种距离方式:a)“西方”中的纪念观点与“东方”中描绘的暴力之间的时空距离,和b)道德距离使观众优于同谋角色。结论:通过按分析或安慰距离,这两种疏远策略都与证明合理的话语的传播共谋,借口,或者否认大规模暴力和极权主义恐怖。
    Background: In the twenty-first century, literatures from Central and Eastern Europe are marked by a boom of documentary fiction portraying complicity Nazi perpetration, Soviet terror, or other instances of 20th century mass violence and totalitarianism. Since understanding the past serves requirements of the present, the boom prompts the question: Why the interest in past complicities now? My hypothesis is that the texts address convergences between involvements in past acts of mass violence and current forms of participation in wrongdoings in neoliberalism. While these issues differ profoundly, they are related: structurally, both present the challenge of forming a nuanced notion of participation. Historically, they are related since justifications of past involvements have established the terminology, narratives, and heuristics in which terror, repression, and mass violence are subsequently discussed, thus forming the frame for negotiating current problematic involvements. Method: Critical discourse analysis is used to scrutinize the legal concept of complicity and combined it with close readings of passages from four literary texts to outline how attention to reciprocity in language can enhance our understanding of problematic involvement. Results: Literary portrayals of historical complicity are ambivalent; they can help to find models for comprehending issues of the present in cultural memory, but they can also serve to establish distance between present and past to appease the sense that all is not quite well, even after the demise of Nazi and Soviet terror. The article outlines two modes of distancing: a) spacio-temporal distancing of the commemorating point of view in \'the West\' from the portrayed violence in \'the East\', and b) moral distancing that casts the audience as superior to complicit characters. Conclusion: By pressing for analytic or consoling distance, both strategies of distancing amount to a complicity with the transmission of discourses that justify, excuse, or deny mass violence and totalitarian terror.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    Understanding the mechanisms of the relationship between the nervous and immune systems within the framework of the concept of the key role of inflammation, taking into account the involved genetic factors in the development of a wide range of combined forms of somatic and mental diseases, is of interest for research as well as for the development of new approaches to early diagnosis and more effective treatment of these diseases. This review analyzes the immune mechanisms of the development of mental disorders in patients with somatic diseases, in particular, the transmission of an inflammatory signal from the periphery to the CNS and the implementation of the influence of inflammatory factors on neurochemical systems that determine the characteristics of mental functioning. Particular attention is paid to the processes underlying the disruption of the blood-brain barrier caused by peripheral inflammation. Modulation of neurotransmission, changes in neuroplasticity, changes in regional activity of the brain in areas associated with the functions of threat recognition, cognitive processes and memory function, the effect of cytokines on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system are considered as mechanisms of action of inflammatory factors in the brain. The need to take into account variations in the genes of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which may be the cause of increased genetic vulnerability associated with the risk mental disorders in patients suffering from a certain somatic disease, is emphasized.
    Понимание механизмов связи нервной и иммунной систем в рамках концепции ключевой роли воспаления с учетом вовлеченных генетических факторов в развитии широкого круга сочетанных форм соматических и психических заболеваний вызывает интерес как для фундаментальной науки, так и для разработки новых подходов к ранней диагностике и более эффективной терапии этих форм. В настоящем обзоре проведен анализ иммунных механизмов психических расстройств на фоне соматической патологии, в частности передачи воспалительного сигнала с периферии в центральную нервную систему и реализации влияния воспалительных факторов на нейрохимические системы, определяющие особенности психического функционирования. Особое внимание уделено процессам, лежащим в основе нарушения гематоэнцефалического барьера, вызванного периферическим воспалением. В качестве механизмов действия воспалительных факторов в головном мозге рассмотрены модуляция нейротрансмиссии, изменения нейропластичности, изменение региональной активности головного мозга в зонах, связанных с функциями распознавания угрозы, когнитивными процессами и функцией памяти, влияние цитокинов на гипоталамо-гипофизарно-надпочечниковую систему. Подчеркивается необходимость учета вариаций в генах провоспалительных цитокинов, что может быть причиной повышенной генетической уязвимости, связанной с риском развития психических расстройств у пациентов, страдающих определенным соматическим заболеванием.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    在这个集合中,我们发展了“共谋”的概念,作为理解医学社会学家如何以意想不到或不舒服的方式与主导权力结构结盟的一种手段。在我们自己的研究中给出了同谋的例子之后,我们引入现有的共谋奖学金,把它描述为一个概念,伴随着责任感,然而不同的是,一系列其他术语,包括反身性,勾结,内疚,内疚和羞耻。我们还讨论了共谋是如何被描述为在机构层面发生的,在理论框架内,在我们每天面对的平凡时刻。在这次审查的基础上,我们假设医学社会学——在那里进入现场通常是来之不易的,在医学和科学机构中“研究”很常见,而我们自己的工作经常涉及医疗机构本身的核心问题——这是一个很可能存在平凡共谋的学科。在这次聚会练习之后,我们介绍了构成这一集合的干预措施:来自健康和疾病社会学家的各种干预措施,也许是第一次以书面形式,解释各种复杂性如何影响他们的工作,以及如何,不同程度的成功,他们寻求补救。最后,我们提供了一些关于开发这个系列的过程的见解,庆祝它的成功,同时也承认仍然存在许多差距和复杂性。
    In this collection we develop the concept of \"complicity\" as a means to understand how medical sociologists might be allied in unexpected or uncomfortable ways with dominant structures of power. After giving examples of complicity from our own research, we introduce existing scholarship on complicity, describing it as a concept that comes coupled with a sense of responsibility and that is related to, yet distinct from, a range of other terms including reflexivity, collusion, guilt, and shame. We also discuss how complicity has been described to occur at the level of the institution, within theoretical frameworks, and during mundane moments that we face on a day-to-day basis. Building on this review, we hypothesise that medical sociology - where access to fieldsites is often hard won, where \"researching up\" in medical and scientific institutions is common, and where our own work frequently concerns matters central to medical institutions themselves - is a discipline wherein mundane complicity is likely. Following this gathering exercise, we introduce the interventions that comprise this collection: interventions from a diversity of sociologists of health and illness who, perhaps for the first time in written form, account for how complicities of various kinds came to shape their work and how, with varying levels of success, they have sought redress. We close by offering some insight into the process of developing this collection, celebrating its successes while also acknowledging that many gaps and complicities remain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胰腺导管腺癌的特点是其强烈的血管增生,或纤维炎症反应。由非恶性细胞主导,因此,突变的上皮必须对抗,在其微环境中与周围的细胞和信号过程合作或共同选择。有人提出,浸润性胰腺导管腺癌代表了恶性和非恶性细胞的协调演变以及破坏和重新利用正常组织组成的机制,促进肿瘤发生的结构和生理学。胰腺癌的复杂动力学和逐步发展表明,它受一组离散的组织规则和原则的支配。并反复尝试靶向微环境中的特定成分,揭示了抵抗的自我调节机制。因此,必须将转化导管上皮的组织病理学和遗传进展模型与基质进展程序一起考虑,以创建胰腺癌演变的全面图片。了解肿瘤的潜在组织逻辑以预测和预防几乎不可避免的代偿机制对于根除疾病至关重要。
    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas are distinguished by their robust desmoplasia, or fibroinflammatory response. Dominated by non-malignant cells, the mutated epithelium must therefore combat, cooperate with or co-opt the surrounding cells and signalling processes in its microenvironment. It is proposed that an invasive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma represents the coordinated evolution of malignant and non-malignant cells and mechanisms that subvert and repurpose normal tissue composition, architecture and physiology to foster tumorigenesis. The complex kinetics and stepwise development of pancreatic cancer suggests that it is governed by a discrete set of organizing rules and principles, and repeated attempts to target specific components within the microenvironment reveal self-regulating mechanisms of resistance. The histopathological and genetic progression models of the transforming ductal epithelium must therefore be considered together with a programme of stromal progression to create a comprehensive picture of pancreatic cancer evolution. Understanding the underlying organizational logic of the tumour to anticipate and pre-empt the almost inevitable compensatory mechanisms will be essential to eradicate the disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号