Complementary integrative health

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    身心干预(MBIs)包括基于正念的干预(MiBIs),基于冥想和口头禅的干预措施(MMI),和基于运动的干预(MoBI)。这些方法已证明在改善创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状方面具有初步功效。然而,以前的系统评价和荟萃分析已经指出,这一研究领域受到比较条件不足的限制,测量的异质性,缺乏客观的结果衡量标准。由于这些原因,有必要对现有的最高质量证据进行更新审查.我们使用医疗保健研究和质量机构(AHRQ)资助的PTSD-Repository证据表来识别相关研究并评估偏倚风险如下:搜索于2018年6月至2022年6月进行,数据库包括PTSDpubs(以前称为PILOTS),Ovid®MEDLINE®,科克伦中部,Embase®,护理和相关健康文献累积指数(CINAHL®),Scopus,和PsycINFO®。26项随机对照试验符合我们的纳入标准。在确定研究并从PTSD-Repository证据表中检索偏见信息的风险之后,我们提取了额外的数据并综合了证据。MIBIs和MMI的证据强度被评为较低,主要是由于矛盾的结果,有源和无源比较器的使用不一致,和高风险的偏见。MoBI的证据强度被评为中等,因为个别研究始终支持干预措施,并且有相对大量的研究和参与者。在26项纳入的研究中,只有两项包括客观结果衡量标准。讨论了未来MBI研究和治疗PTSD的临床应用的意义。
    Mind-body interventions (MBIs) include mindfulness-based interventions (MiBIs), meditation- and mantra-based interventions (MMIs), and movement-based interventions (MoBIs). These approaches have demonstrated preliminary efficacy in improving posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. However, previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have noted that this area of research is limited by inadequate comparator conditions, heterogeneity of measurement, and absence of objective outcome measures. For these reasons, an updated review of the highest-quality evidence available is warranted. We used the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-funded evidence tables for the PTSD-Repository to identify relevant studies and assess the risk of bias as follows: The search was conducted between June 2018 and June 2022, and databases included PTSDpubs (formerly PILOTS), Ovid® MEDLINE®, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase®, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL®), SCOPUS, and PsycINFO®. Twenty-six randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria. After identifying studies and retrieving risk of bias information from the PTSD-Repository evidence tables, we extracted additional data and synthesized the evidence. The strength of evidence was rated as low for MiBIs and MMIs, largely due to contradicting results, inconsistent use of active versus passive comparators, and high risk of bias. The strength of evidence for MoBIs was rated as moderate due to individual studies consistently favoring the intervention and a relatively large number of studies and participants. Of the 26 included studies, only two included objective outcome measures. Implications for future MBI research and clinical applications for treating PTSD are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探讨镰状细胞病(SCD)患者和SCD诊所提供者和工作人员对使用针灸和引导放松治疗慢性SCD疼痛的观点。获得的数据是为有效性实施临床试验(GRACE试验)提供实施蓝图,测试与常规护理相比,针灸或引导放松是否可以减少慢性疼痛。设计:定性研究设计。方法:我们对SCD和SCD诊所提供者和工作人员进行了33次半结构化访谈。采访被转录和编码。使用演绎内容分析过程来识别主题。结果:确定了四个主题:对针刺和引导放松的接受度,意识有限,补充和综合健康(CIH)治疗偏好,和进入壁垒。患者,诊所提供者和工作人员都愿意使用针灸和引导放松来治疗慢性疼痛。在了解了这些H疗法之后,一些患者表达了对一种疗法的偏好。他们还讨论了他们成功参与每种疗法的能力。需要通过增加对每种疗法如何实施和减轻疼痛的功能的理解来消除对疗法的误解。我们发现了一些可能影响试验成功和未来卫生系统整合的潜在障碍,包括时间,交通运输,和技术。结论:这项研究是首次提出SCD患者以及临床提供者和工作人员对使用针灸和引导放松治疗慢性SCD疼痛的观点之一。利益相关者的早期投入和观点强调,他们欢迎非药理学CIH疗法。实施临床试验和未来的卫生系统整合将需要解决错误信息并确定克服获取障碍的策略。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04906447。
    Objective: This study aimed to explore perspectives of people living with sickle cell disease (SCD) and SCD clinic providers and staff about the use of acupuncture and guided relaxation for treating chronic SCD pain. Data obtained were to inform an implementation blueprint for an effectiveness implementation clinical trial (GRACE Trial) testing whether acupuncture or guided relaxation reduces chronic pain when compared with usual care. Design: Qualitative research design. Methods: We conducted 33 semistructured interviews with people with SCD and SCD clinic providers and staff. Interviews were transcribed and coded. A deductive content analysis process was used to identify themes. Results: Four themes were identified: Receptivity to Acupuncture and Guided Relaxation, Limited Awareness, Complementary and Integrative Health (CIH) Therapy Preference, and Access Barriers. Both patients and clinic providers and staff were open to the use of acupuncture and guided relaxation for chronic pain treatment. After learning about these CIH therapies, some patients expressed a preference for one therapy over the other. They also discussed their ability to successfully engage with each therapy. There is a need to dispel misconceptions about the therapies by increasing understanding of how each therapy is implemented and functions to reduce pain. We identified several potential barriers that might affect the success of the trial and future health system integration, including time, transportation, and technology. Conclusion: This study is one of the first to present perspectives of both patients with SCD and clinic providers and staff on the use of acupuncture and guided relaxation for chronic SCD pain. Stakeholders\' early input and perspectives highlighted that they welcome nonpharmacological CIH therapies. Implementation of a clinical trial and future health system integration will require the addressing misinformation and identifying strategies to overcome access barriers. Clinical trial registration number: NCT04906447.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:高移动频谱障碍(HSD)和Ehlers-Danlos综合征(EDS)经常被诊断不足,导致医疗保健系统中患者的不满。本研究评估了卫生服务利用情况,care,以及美国和加拿大HSD和EDS成人患有慢性病的主观体验。
    未经授权:这是匿名的,基于网络的,横断面医疗保健调查。调查获得了基本的人口统计信息,慢性病护理患者评估(PACIC+),以及对医疗保健和综合医学使用问题的回答。
    未经评估:共收到353项调查。最常见的补充疗法是物理治疗(82%),按摩(68%),瑜伽(58%)脊椎指压疗法(48%),冥想(43%)。平均(SD)汇总PACIC和PACIC5As评分分别为2.16(0.77)和2.25(0.83),分别。在所有PACIC域中,典型就诊时间为30分钟或至少1小时的个体的平均得分明显高于典型就诊时间为15分钟的个体(单向方差分析均p<0.0001).人们普遍同意患者与提供者关系和信任的重要性,医生了解个人的完整病史,并优先考虑身体和情绪安全(>95%同意或强烈同意每个)。
    UNASSIGNED:患有HSD或EDS的人报告对慢性病护理的满意度较低,通常会寻求补充和自我管理的疗法,可能是为了控制症状。受访者表示希望获得更多的时间和医生的关注。这项研究的结果可以教育医疗保健社区改善HSD和EDS人群的支持机制。高移动频谱障碍(HSD)或Ehlers-Danlos综合征(EDS)患者表达了对其他HSD或EDS患者以患者为中心的护理和同伴支持的愿望。患有HSD或EDS的人通常会因其病情和对慢性护理的满意度而看过多位医生,根据患者慢性病护理评估(PACIC+),是低的。使用各种补充和综合的健康治疗方法,以及专门的饮食,在这个人群中很常见,可能对症状管理有益。HSD和EDS的医疗保健交付可能需要多学科医疗保健团队,作为补充和自我护理模式通常使用除了物理治疗,止痛药,和其他常规护理。
    Hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) and Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) are frequently underdiagnosed, contributing to patient dissatisfaction in the healthcare system. This study evaluated the health service utilization, care, and subjective experiences of living with chronic illness among adults with HSD and EDS in the United States and Canada.
    This was an anonymous, web-based, cross-sectional healthcare survey. The survey obtained basic demographic information, the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC+), as well as responses to questions on the use of healthcare and integrative medicine.
    A total of 353 surveys were received. The most common complementary therapies used were physical therapy (82%), massage (68%), yoga (58%), chiropractic (48%), and meditation (43%). Mean (SD) summary PACIC and PACIC 5 As scores were 2.16 (0.77) and 2.25 (0.83), respectively. Across all PACIC domains, mean scores of individuals whose typical doctor visit was 30 min or at least an hour were significantly higher than those of individuals who indicated typical visits of 15 min (all p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA). There was widespread agreement on the importance of patient-provider relationship and trust, physicians\' understanding of the individual\'s complete medical history, and prioritization of physical and emotional safety (>95% agree or strongly agree to each).
    Individuals with HSD or EDS report low satisfaction with chronic illness care and commonly seek out complementary and self-administered therapies, likely in an attempt to manage symptoms. Respondents reported a desire for greater time and attention from physicians. Results from this study could educate the healthcare community to improve support mechanisms for HSD and EDS populations.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPatients with hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) or Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) express a desire for patient-centered care and peer support from other individuals with HSD or EDS.Individuals with HSD or EDS have typically seen multiple doctors for their condition and their satisfaction with chronic care, as measured by the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC+), is low.The use of various complementary and integrative health treatments, as well as specialized diets, is common in this population, and might be beneficial for symptom management.Healthcare delivery for HSD and EDS may require a multidisciplinary healthcare team, as complementary and self-care modalities are typically used in addition to physical therapy, pain medication, and other conventional care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    简介:外阴痛是持续至少3个月的外阴疼痛,没有明确的可识别的原因,可能有其他相关因素。的目标,探讨女性参与针灸治疗外阴痛的双盲随机对照试验的动机。方法:对问题的回答:“告诉我你为什么决定参加这项研究”,使用概念内容分析进行分析,以确定参与研究的动机模式。结果:出现了四种模式:1)渴望解决不受控制的疼痛,2)渴望理解,3)希望为知识生成做出贡献,4)需要消除成本障碍。结论:动机表明外阴痛特定方面的针灸可接受性。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03364127。
    Introduction: Vulvodynia is vulvar pain lasting at least 3-months without clear identifiable cause that may have other associated factors. The aim, to explore motivations of women participating in a double-blind randomized controlled trial of acupuncture for vulvodynia. Methods: Responses to the question: \"Tell me about why you decided to participate in this study\" were analyzed using conceptual content analysis to identify patterns in motivation for study participation. Results: Four patterns emerged: 1) desire to address uncontrolled pain, 2) desire for understanding, 3) wish to contribute to knowledge generation, and 4) need to remove cost barriers. Conclusion: Motivations indicate vulvodynia-specific aspects of acceptability of acupuncture. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03364127.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非药物疗法和实践通常用于健康维护和慢性疾病的管理。使用健康实践的模式和原因可以识别临床上有意义的用户亚组。这项研究的目的是使用潜在的类别分析来确定自我报告使用常规和补充性非药理学健康实践的类别,并估计参与者特征与类别成员的关联。
    方法:来自纵向队列(n=1850)的明尼苏达州国民警卫队退伍军人邮寄调查(2015年10月至2016年9月)评估了当前的疼痛,自我报告的整体健康状况,心理健康,物质使用,人格特质,和健康实践使用。我们制定了健康实践清单,一种自我报告工具,评估19种常见的常规和补充性非药理学健康相关做法的使用情况。潜在类别分析用于识别健康实践用户的亚组,基于对HPI的回应。参与者被分配到他们的最大似然班级,它被用作多项逻辑回归的结果,以检查参与者特征与潜在类别成员的关联。
    结果:一半的样本使用非药物健康实践。确定了六类用户。“低使用率”(50%)的健康实践使用率较低。“锻炼”(23%)锻炼使用率很高。“心理治疗”(6%)使用心理治疗和支持团体较多。“手动疗法”(12%)大量使用脊椎按摩疗法,物理治疗,和按摩。“正念”(5%)高度使用正念和放松练习。“多式联运”(4%)对大多数做法的使用率很高。使用手动疗法(脊椎按摩疗法,针灸,物理治疗,按摩)与慢性疼痛和女性有关。预测使用模式的特征因类别而异。使用自我指导的做法(例如,有氧运动,瑜伽)与吸收(对经验的开放性)的人格特质相关。使用心理治疗与较高的心理困扰率相关。
    结论:这些观察到的非药物健康实践的使用模式表明,功能相似的实践正在一起使用,并建议基于自我指导/主动和医生提供的健康实践进行有意义的分类。值得注意的是,互补和传统做法的用户存在相当大的重叠。
    BACKGROUND: Non-pharmacological therapies and practices are commonly used for both health maintenance and management of chronic disease. Patterns and reasons for use of health practices may identify clinically meaningful subgroups of users. The objectives of this study were to identify classes of self-reported use of conventional and complementary non-pharmacological health practices using latent class analysis and estimate associations of participant characteristics with class membership.
    METHODS: A mailed survey (October 2015 to September 2016) of Minnesota National Guard Veterans from a longitudinal cohort (n = 1850) assessed current pain, self-reported overall health, mental health, substance use, personality traits, and health practice use. We developed the Health Practices Inventory, a self-report instrument assessing use of 19 common conventional and complementary non-pharmacological health-related practices. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of health practice users, based on responses to the HPI. Participants were assigned to their maximum-likelihood class, which was used as the outcome in multinomial logistic regression to examine associations of participant characteristics with latent class membership.
    RESULTS: Half of the sample used non-pharmacological health practices. Six classes of users were identified. \"Low use\" (50%) had low rates of health practice use. \"Exercise\" (23%) had high exercise use. \"Psychotherapy\" (6%) had high use of psychotherapy and support groups. \"Manual therapies\" (12%) had high use of chiropractic, physical therapy, and massage. \"Mindfulness\" (5%) had high use of mindfulness and relaxation practice. \"Multimodal\" (4%) had high use of most practices. Use of manual therapies (chiropractic, acupuncture, physical therapy, massage) was associated with chronic pain and female sex. Characteristics that predict use patterns varied by class. Use of self-directed practices (e.g., aerobic exercise, yoga) was associated with the personality trait of absorption (openness to experience). Use of psychotherapy was associated with higher rates of psychological distress.
    CONCLUSIONS: These observed patterns of use of non-pharmacological health practices show that functionally similar practices are being used together and suggest a meaningful classification of health practices based on self-directed/active and practitioner-delivered. Notably, there is considerable overlap in users of complementary and conventional practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    To evaluate acceptability and clinical outcomes of acupuncture on patient-reported pain and anxiety in an emergency department (ED).
    Observational, retrospective pilot study.
    Abbott Northwestern Hospital ED, Minneapolis, MN.
    Retrospective data was used to identify patients receiving acupuncture in addition to standard medical care in the ED between 11/1/13 and 12/31/14. Feasibility was measured by quantifying the utilization of acupuncture in a novel setting and performing limited tests of its efficacy. Patient-reported pain and anxiety scores were collected by the acupuncturist using an 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale before (pre) and immediately after (post) acupuncture. Efficacy outcomes were change in pain and anxiety scores.
    During the study period, 436 patients were referred for acupuncture, 279 of whom were approached by the acupuncturist during their ED visit. Consent for acupuncture was obtained from 89% (248/279). A total of 182 patients, who had a pre-pain score >0 and non-missing anxiety scores, were included in analyses. Of the 52% (94/182) who did not have analgesics before or during the acupuncture session, the average decrease of 2.37 points (95% CI: 1.92, 2.83) was not different (p > 0.05) than the mean decrease of 2.68 points for those receiving analgesics (95% CI 2.21, 3.15). The average pre-anxiety score was 4.73 points (SD = 3.43) and the mean decrease was 2.27 points (95% CI: 1.89, 2.66).
    Results from this observational trial indicate that acupuncture was acceptable and effective for pain and anxiety reduction, in conjunction with standard medical care. These results will inform future randomized trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号