We present a combination of distal cholangiocarcinoma of the intrapancreatic common bile duct and intraductal papillary mucinous tumor associated with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic tail. This clinical case is unique. When analyzing the literature, we found no any case of similar primary multiple malignant tumor. Importantly, final diagnosis of simultaneous malignant pancreatobiliary neoplasia is possible only via intraoperative biopsy after adequate morphological dissection and research of resected organ complex including molecular genetic analysis due to identical histological and immunohistochemical picture of ductal neoplasia.
Представлен клинический случай сочетания дистальной холангиокарциномы интрапанкреатической части общего желчного протока и внутрипротоковой папиллярной муцинозной опухоли в ассоциации с протоковой аденокарциномой хвоста поджелудочной железы. Данный клинический случай является уникальным. При изучении литературы не удалось найти ни одного документированного описания такой первично множественной злокачественной опухоли. Следует отметить, что заключительный диагноз при симультанных злокачественных неоплазиях панкреатобилиарной зоны возможен только при изучении интраоперационно полученного материала, при адекватной тактике морфологической диссекции и изучении резецированного органокомплекса, включая молекулярно-генетическое исследование полученного материала, ввиду идентичной гистологической и иммуногистохимической картины протоковых неоплазий.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed operations by general surgeons, with up to 1 million cholecystectomies performed annually in the United States alone. Despite familiarity, common bile duct injury occurs in no less than 0.2% of cholecystectomies, with significant associated morbidity. Understanding biliary anatomy, surgical techniques, pitfalls, and bailout maneuvers is critical to optimizing outcomes when encountering the horrible gallbladder. This article describes normal and aberrant biliary anatomy, complicated cholelithiasis, ways to recognize cholecystitis, and considerations of surgical approach.

UNASSIGNED: Schwannomas are benign nerve sheath tumors that are extremely rare in the biliary tract. A comprehensive review of literature enumerated approximately 30 case reports of schwannoma in the biliary tract tree and porta hepatis region.
UNASSIGNED: We report a case of a 40-year-old female who presented with abdominal pain. Imaging revealed a mass at the porta hepatis extending from the portal bifurcation till the hilum encasing the main portal vein and abutting the right portal vein. Differentials of carcinoma, lymphoma, and mesenchymal tumor were kept. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of the mass showed a benign nerve sheath tumor, immunopositive for S100. The histopathological evaluation of the excised mass confirmed the origin of mass in the common bile duct.
UNASSIGNED: Our case highlights that schwannomas, though benign, can mimic a carcinoma or lymphoma if present at a rare site such as bile ducts. An exhaustive clinical and radiological workup with diligent histopathological evaluation is mandatory in dealing with such rare cases as radical surgery and chemotherapy can be avoided in such patients.
UNASSIGNED: Os schwannomas são tumores benignos da bainhas nervosas, que são extremamente raros ao nível das vias biliares. Uma revisão abrangente da literatura enumerou cerca de 30 casos de schwannomas com envolvimento da árvore biliar e da região da Porta Hepatis.
UNASSIGNED: Relatamos um caso de uma doente de 40 anos que apresentava dor abdominal. A imagem revelou uma massa que se prolonga desde a bifurcação da veia porta até ao hilo hepático, com “encasement” da veia porta principal e “abutement” da veia porta direita. Foram considerados os diagnósticos diferenciais de carcinoma, linfoma e tumor mesenquimatoso. A biópsia guiada por ecografia da massa mostrou um tumor benigno da bainha nervosa, imunopositivo para o S100. A avaliação histopatológica da massa excisada confirmou a sua origem na via biliar comum.
UNASSIGNED: O nosso caso realça que os schwannomas, embora benignos, podem imitar um carcinoma ou linfoma se estiverem presentes num local raro, como os canais biliares. Um trabalho clínico e radiológico exaustivo com uma avaliação histopatológica diligente é obrigatória para orientar com casos tão raros, em que a cirurgia radical e a quimioterapia podem ser evitadas.

Common bile duct duplications represent exceptionally rare congenital anomalies of the biliary tract. In this case report we document an unusual variant of common bile duct duplication in a 79-year-old man who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary cancer. The duplication consisted of two unseparated, completely-layered, common bile ducts which originated above the cystic duct junction and terminated prior to the point of insertion into the pancreas, where the two lumens converged into a single duct. Duplication of the bile duct is rare and often goes undetected. In the present case, the anomaly was found incidentally in a patient who had a pancreaticoduodenectomy for an ampullary carcinoma. However, duplication may be associated with choledocholithiasis, cholangitis, pancreatitis, and pancreaticobiliary malignancies and it is important to be aware of the condition.

Spontaneous or idiopathic bile duct perforation is rare, mostly seen in children from 25 weeks of gestation to 7 years of age, with the confluence of cystic duct and common hepatic duct (CHD) being the most common site. The exact aetiopathogenesis remains elusive and poorly understood, leading to a lack of consensus on its optimal management. The condition is often diagnosed intraoperatively. We present a case of spontaneous perforation of the CHD in a boy in his middle childhood, alongside a review of relevant literature. The patient presented with acute abdomen and pyobiliary peritonitis, for which a hollow viscus perforation was suspected. An emergent laparotomy revealed a 0.5 cm CHD perforation. Surgical intervention involved T-tube insertion and drainage, leading to a successful recovery. This case underscores the challenge of preoperative diagnosis, necessitating prompt exploration after initial resuscitation. There is a need for clinical vigilance and tailored surgical approaches.

The increased incidence of gallstones can be linked to previous gastrectomy (PG). However, the success rate of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-creatography after gastrectomy has significantly reduced. In such cases, laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) may be an alternative. In this study, LTCBDE was evaluated for its safety and feasibility in patients with PG. We retrospectively evaluated 300 patients who underwent LTCBDE between January 2015 and June 2023. The subjects were divided into 2 groups according to their PG status: PG group and No-PG group. The perioperative data from the 2 groups were compared. The operation time in the PG group was longer than that in the No-PG group (184.69 ± 20.28 minutes vs 152.19 ± 26.37 minutes, P < .01). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss (61.19 ± 41.65 mL vs 50.83 ± 30.47 mL, P = .087), postoperative hospital stay (6.36 ± 1.94 days vs 5.94 ± 1.36 days, P = .125), total complication rate (18.6 % vs 14.1 %, P = .382), stone clearance rate (93.2 % vs 96.3 %, P = .303), stone recurrence rate (3.4 % vs 1.7 %, P = .395), and conversion rate (6.8 % vs 7.0 %, P = .941) between the 2 groups. No deaths occurred in either groups. A history of gastrectomy may not affect the feasibility and safety of LTCBDE, because its perioperative results are comparable to those of patients with a history of No-gastrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to explore the indications for three minimally invasive approaches-T-tube external drainage, double J-tube internal drainage, and primary closure-in laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with common bile duct exploration.
METHODS: Three hundred eighty-nine patients with common bile duct stones who were treated at the Second People\'s Hospital of Hefei between February 2018 and January 2023 were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into three groups based on the surgical approach used: the T-tube drainage group, the double J-tube internal drainage group, and the primary closure group. General data, including sex, age, and BMI, were compared among the three groups preoperatively. Surgical time, length of hospital stay, pain scores, and other aspects were compared among the three groups. Differences in liver function, inflammatory factors, and postoperative complications were also compared among the three groups.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the three groups in terms of sex, age, BMI, or other general data preoperatively (P > 0.05). There were significant differences between the primary closure group and the T-tube drainage group in terms of surgical time and pain scores (P < 0.05). The primary closure group and double J-tube drainage group differed from the T-tube drainage group in terms of length of hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, and time to passage of gas (P <0.05). Among the three groups, there were no statistically significant differences in inflammatory factors or liver function, TBIL, AST, ALP, ALT, GGT, CRP, or IL-6, before surgery or on the third day after surgery (P > 0.05). However, on the third day after surgery, liver function in all three groups was significantly lower than that before surgery (P<0.05). In all three groups, the levels of CRP and IL-6 were significantly lower than their preoperative levels. The primary closure group had significantly lower CRP and IL-6 levels than did the T-tube drainage group (P < 0.05). The primary closure group differed from the T-tube drainage group in terms of the incidences of bile leakage and electrolyte imbalance (P < 0.05). The double J-tube drainage group differed from the T-tube drainage group in terms of the tube dislodgement rate (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Although primary closure of the bile ducts has clear advantages in terms of length of hospital stay and hospitalization expenses, it is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications, particularly bile leakage. T-tube drainage and double J-tube internal drainage also have their own advantages. The specific surgical approach should be selected based on the preoperative assessment, indications, and other factors to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications.

BACKGROUND: Early reports suggested that previous abdominal surgery was a relative contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) on account of difficulty and potential access complications. This study analyses different types/systems of previous surgery and locations of scars and how they affect access difficulties. As modified access techniques to minimise risk of complications are under-reported the study details and evaluates them.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data from consecutive LC and common bile duct explorations (LCBDE) performed by a single surgeon over 30 years was analysed. Previous abdominal surgery was documented and peri-operative outcomes were compared with patients who had no previous surgery using Chi-squared analysis.
RESULTS: Of 5916 LC and LCBDE, 1846 patients (31.2%) had previous abdominal surgery. The median age was 60 years. Those with previous surgery required more frequent duodenal (RR 1.07; p = 0.023), hepatic flexure (RR 1.11; p = 0.043) and distal adhesiolysis (RR 3.57; p < 0.001) and had more access related bowel injuries (0.4% vs. 0.0%; p < 0.001). Previous upper gastrointestinal and biliary surgery had the highest rates of adhesiolysis (76.3%), difficult cystic pedicles (58.8%), fundus-first approach (7.2%), difficulty grades (64.9% Grades 3-5) and utilisation of abdominal drains (71.1%). Previous open surgery resulted in longer operative time compared to previous laparoscopic procedures (65vs.55 min; p < 0.001), increased difficulty of pedicle dissection (42.4% vs. 36.0%; p < 0.05) and required more duodenal, hepatic flexure and distant adhesiolysis (p < 0.05) and fundus-first dissection (4% vs 2%; p < 0.05). Epigastric and supraumbilical access and access through umbilical and other hernias were used in 163 patients (8.8%) with no bowel complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The risks of access and adhesiolysis in patients with previous abdominal scars undergoing biliary surgery are dependent on the nature of previous surgery. Previous open, upper gastrointestinal and biliary surgery carried the most significant risks. Modified access techniques can be adopted to safely mitigate these risks.

A prevailing animal model currently used to study severe human diseases like obstructive cholestasis, primary biliary or sclerosing cholangitis, biliary atresia, and acute liver injury is the common bile duct ligation (cBDL). Modifications of this model include ligation of the left hepatic bile duct (pBDL) or ligation of the left bile duct with the corresponding left hepatic artery (pBDL+pAL). Both modifications induce cholestasis only in the left liver lobe. After induction of total or partial cholestasis in mice, the well-being of these animals was evaluated by assessing burrowing behavior, body weight, and a distress score. To compare the pathological features of these animal models, plasma levels of liver enzymes, bile acids, bilirubin, and within the liver tissue, necrosis, fibrosis, inflammation, as well as expression of genes involved in the synthesis or transport of bile acids were assessed. The survival rate of the animals and their well-being was comparable between pBDL+pAL and pBDL. However, surgical intervention by pBDL+pAL caused confluent necrosis and collagen depositions at the edge of necrotic tissue, whereas pBDL caused focal necrosis and fibrosis in between portal areas. Interestingly, pBDL animals had a higher survival rate and their well-being was significantly improved compared to cBDL animals. On day 14 after cBDL liver aspartate, as well as alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, glutamate dehydrogenase, bile acids, and bilirubin were significantly elevated, but only glutamate dehydrogenase activity was increased after pBDL. Thus, pBDL may be primarily used to evaluate local features such as inflammation and fibrosis or regulation of genes involved in bile acid synthesis or transport but does not allow to study all systemic features of cholestasis. The pBDL model also has the advantage that fewer mice are needed, because of its high survival rate, and that the well-being of the animals is improved compared to the cBDL animal model.

Situs inversus complicates diagnosis and treatment due to the mirrored organ placement in relation to normal anatomy. This report describes a 78-year-old female patient with situs inversus totalis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Utilizing the \"French mirror technique\" for port placement, the surgeon adeptly mirrored standard maneuvers with a 2-mm needle forceps in the left hand and a 5-mm forceps in the right in a reversed anatomical setting. This technique maintained familiar hand movements, despite the patient\'s unique anatomy. The surgeon applied transcystic ductal bile duct exploration, using choledochoscopy for duct exploration and a basket catheter for stone removal. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration through the transcystic ductal route are viable and effective for patients with situs inversus.