Colostomy

结肠造口术
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一名30多岁的男性在醉酒和躺在街上时被车撞后被送往急诊室。他的一般情况稳定;然而,他会阴裂伤延伸到尾骨。由于伤口边缘靠近肛门,我们担心潜在的污染,并选择不缝合它。因此,我们避免缝合伤口,并在冲洗和清创后保持伤口开放。此外,我们做了横向结肠造口术.在第4天,我们开始了40天的负压伤口治疗,在此期间发生足够的伤口肉芽。病人出院了,伤后约4个月关闭结肠造口术。我们的案例说明了负压伤口治疗在治疗会阴裂伤中的有效性。
    A male in his early 30s was transported to the emergency room after being hit by a vehicle while inebriated and lying in the street. His general condition was stable; however, he had a perineal laceration that extended to the coccyx. Due to the proximity of the wound margin to the anus, we were concerned regarding the potential contamination and opted not to suture it. Therefore, we refrained from suturing the wound and kept the wound open after irrigation and debridement. Additionally, we performed a transverse colostomy. On day 4, we initiated negative pressure wound therapy for 40 days, during which sufficient wound granulation occurred. The patient was discharged, and the colostomy was closed approximately 4 months after the injury. Our case illustrates the effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in managing perineal lacerations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究在定性研究中采用了现象学研究方法,以探索患有临时结肠造口术的老年人在管理日常生活和护理需求方面遇到的挑战。保护肛门手术结合临时结肠造口术已成为低位直肠癌的普遍治疗方式。然而,回肠造口术易受造口周围皮肤并发症的影响,以及流体,电解质,营养失衡,对有效管理构成挑战。患者成功的自我管理与他们对临时结肠造口术的调整密切相关;尽管如此,对影响暂时性结肠造口患者自我护理能力的因素及其面临的障碍的研究仍然缺乏。
    目的:为了调查生活经历,感知,以及家庭环境中临时结肠造口患者的护理要求,最终目的是制定标准化的管理协议。
    方法:在2023年6月至8月期间,采用目的抽样技术从上海某三甲医院抽取12例暂时性肠造口患者,中国。采用现象学研究方法,开发了半结构化面试指南,定性访谈采用深度访谈技术进行。采集的数据经过编码,分析,组织,并按照Colaizzi的七步方法进行总结。
    结果:这项研究的结果表明,暂时性肠造口患者的经历和需求可以分为四个主要主题:首先,临时结肠造口患者承担着各种负担和对疾病进展的不确定性的担忧;其次,患者表现出有限的自我护理能力和面临的信息缺陷,导致对医疗保健专业人员的高度依赖;第三,患者通过主动的自我调整表现出潜在的内在动机;最后,患者表达了对情感和社会支持的显著需求。
    结论:家庭生活的暂时性肠造口患者面临多方面的挑战,包括负担,自理能力不足,信息缺陷,和情感需求。确定影响患者在家自我护理的因素,并提出缓解障碍的策略,可以作为制定和实施针对暂时性肠造口患者需求的护理干预措施的基础框架。
    BACKGROUND: This study employed a phenomenological research approach within qualitative research to explore the challenges encountered by elderly individuals with temporary colostomies in managing their daily lives and care needs. Protecting the anus surgery combined with temporary colostomy has emerged as a prevalent treatment modality for low rectal cancer. However, the ileostomy is susceptible to peri-stoma skin complications, as well as fluid, electrolyte, and nutritional imbalances, posing challenges to effective management. The successful self-management of patients is intricately linked to their adjustment to temporary colostomy; nonetheless, there remains a dearth of research examining the factors influencing self-care among temporary colostomy patients and the obstacles they confront.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the lived experiences, perceptions, and care requirements of temporary colostomy patients within their home environment, with the ultimate goal of formulating a standardized management protocol.
    METHODS: Over the period of June to August 2023, a purposive sampling technique was utilized to select 12 patients with temporary intestinal stomas from a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China. Employing a phenomenological research approach, a semi-structured interview guide was developed, and qualitative interviews were conducted using in-depth interview techniques. The acquired data underwent coding, analysis, organization, and summarization following Colaizzi\'s seven-step method.
    RESULTS: The findings of this study revealed that the experiences and needs of patients with temporary intestinal stomas can be delineated into four principal themes: Firstly, Temporary colostomy patients bear various burdens and concerns about the uncertainty of disease progression; secondly, patients exhibit limited self-care capabilities and face information deficits, resulting in heightened reliance on healthcare professionals; thirdly, patients demonstrate the potential for internal motivation through proactive self-adjustment; and finally, patients express a significant need for emotional and social support.
    CONCLUSIONS: Home-living patients with temporary intestinal stomas confront multifaceted challenges encompassing burdens, inadequate self-care abilities, informational deficits, and emotional needs. Identifying factors influencing patients\' self-care at home and proposing strategies to mitigate barriers can serve as a foundational framework for developing and implementing nursing interventions tailored to the needs of patients with temporary intestinal stomas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:恶性大肠梗阻(LBO)是妇科癌症患者的常见并发症,是紧急手术的指征。然而,预期寿命和随后的医疗服务利用是未知的.我们试图估计结肠造口术后的总生存期(OS),并描述晚期妇科恶性肿瘤患者随后的医疗保健利用情况。
    方法:我们对2014年3月至2023年1月间因LBO而接受结肠造口术的晚期妇科癌症患者进行了回顾性分析。摘要统计用于描述研究人群的临床和人口统计学特征。OS是使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计的,我们使用国家质量论坛发布的标准来定义生命结束时的医疗保健利用率。
    结果:共纳入78例患者。手术时的中位年龄为61岁(范围:34-83岁),大多数患者卵巢复发,输卵管,或原发性腹膜癌(n=51,65.4%),其次是宫颈癌(n=16,20.5%),和子宫癌(n=10,12.8%)。中位Charlson合并症指数为3,中位术后住院时间为5天(范围:1-26)。所有患者的中位随访时间为4.5个月(范围:0.07-46.2),中位OS为4.5个月(95%CI:2.9-6.0),包括12例(15.4%)OS<30天患者和21例(26.9%)OS<60天患者。在生命的最后30天,62.7%的病人再次入院,53.0%在急诊科就诊,18.5%的人被送往重症监护室。
    结论:相当比例的患者在手术后60天内死亡,许多人在生命结束时拥有很高的医疗保健利用率。
    OBJECTIVE: Malignant large bowel obstruction (LBO) is a frequent complication affecting women with gynecologic cancers and is an indication for emergent surgery. However, the life expectancy and subsequent medical care utilization are unknown. We sought to estimate overall survival (OS) following colostomy and describe subsequent healthcare utilization among patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced gynecologic cancers who underwent colostomy with palliative intent due to LBO at our institution between March 2014 and January 2023. Summary statistics were used to describe the clinical and demographic characteristics of the study population. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and we defined healthcare utilization at the end-of-life using criteria published by the National Quality Forum.
    RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were included. The median age at the time of surgery was 61 (range: 34-83), and most patients had recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (n = 51, 65.4%), followed by cervical cancer (n = 16, 20.5%), and uterine cancer (n = 10, 12.8%). The median Charlson comorbidity index was 3 and median postoperative length of stay was five days (range: 1-26). The median follow-up for all patients was 4.5 months (range: 0.07-46.2), and the median OS was 4.5 months (95% CI: 2.9-6.0), including 12 patients (15.4%) with <30-day OS and 21 (26.9%) with <60-day OS. In the last 30 days of life, 62.7% of patients were re-admitted to the hospital, 53.0% were seen in the emergency department, and 18.5% were admitted to an intensive care unit.
    CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients died within 60 days of surgery, and many had high healthcare utilization at the end of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管在直肠癌切除术中广泛采用了机器人辅助手术(RAS),与腹腔镜(Lap)和开放(OS)手术相比,其临床优势仍然有限。我们旨在比较RAS与Lap和OS治疗直肠癌的临床结果。
    方法:我们从PINCAI™Healthcare数据库中确定了所有年龄≥18岁的患者,这些患者在2013年1月至2020年12月接受了需要暂时性或永久性造口形成的选择性直肠癌切除术。我们完成了考虑医院聚类的多变量逻辑回归分析,以比较手术方法之间的回肠造口术形成。接下来,我们建立了治疗加权反概率分析,以分别比较回肠造口术和永久性结肠造口术的结局.结果包括术后并发症,住院死亡率,出院回家,再操作,30天的重新接纳。
    结果:共有12,787例患者(OS:5599[43.8%];Lap:2872[22.5%];RAS:4316[33.7%])接受了择期直肠癌切除术。与OS相比,有Lap(OR1.29,p<0.001)或RAS(OR1.53,p<0.001)的患者更有可能进行回肠造口术,而不是永久性结肠造口术.在那些有回肠造口术的人中,与Lap相比,RAS与较少的肠梗阻(OR0.71,p<0.001)和较少的出血(OR0.50,p<0.001)相关。此外,RAS与较低的吻合口漏相关(OR0.25,p<0.001),出血减少(OR0.51,p<0.001),与OS相比,输血次数较少(OR0.70,p=0.022)。在那些有永久性结肠造口形成的患者中,RAS与较少的肠梗阻相关(OR0.72,p<0.001),出血减少(OR0.78,p=0.021),30天再次手术减少(OR0.49,p<0.001),和更高的放电回家(OR1.26,p=0.013)比Lap,以及OS。
    结论:与Lap和OS相比,接受RAS治疗的直肠癌患者更有可能进行回肠造口术而不是永久性结肠造口术,并且恢复更快。
    BACKGROUND: Despite widespread adoption of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in rectal cancer resection, there remains limited knowledge of its clinical advantage over laparoscopic (Lap) and open (OS) surgery. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of RAS with Lap and OS for rectal cancer.
    METHODS: We identified all patients aged ≥ 18 years who had elective rectal cancer resection requiring temporary or permanent stoma formation from 1/2013 to 12/2020 from the PINC AI™ Healthcare Database. We completed multivariable logistic regression analysis accounting for hospital clustering to compare ileostomy formation between surgical approaches. Next, we built inverse probability of treatment-weighted analyses to compare outcomes for ileostomy and permanent colostomy separately. Outcomes included postoperative complications, in-hospital mortality, discharge to home, reoperation, and 30-day readmission.
    RESULTS: A total of 12,787 patients (OS: 5599 [43.8%]; Lap: 2872 [22.5%]; RAS: 4316 [33.7%]) underwent elective rectal cancer resection. Compared to OS, patients who had Lap (OR 1.29, p < 0.001) or RAS (OR 1.53, p < 0.001) were more likely to have an ileostomy rather than permanent colostomy. In those with ileostomy, RAS was associated with fewer ileus (OR 0.71, p < 0.001) and less bleeding (OR 0.50, p < 0.001) compared to Lap. In addition, RAS was associated with lower anastomotic leak (OR 0.25, p < 0.001), less bleeding (OR 0.51, p < 0.001), and fewer blood transfusions (OR 0.70, p = 0.022) when compared to OS. In those patients who had permanent colostomy formation, RAS was associated with fewer ileus (OR 0.72, p < 0.001), less bleeding (OR 0.78, p = 0.021), lower 30-day reoperation (OR 0.49, p < 0.001), and higher discharge to home (OR 1.26, p = 0.013) than Lap, as well as OS.
    CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cancer patients treated with RAS were more likely to have an ileostomy rather than a permanent colostomy and more enhanced recovery compared to Lap and OS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    这个严重的猴痘病例描述了一名23岁的男性,患有晚期HIV-1疾病,表现为直肠周围脓肿,广泛的肛门溃疡性病变需要结肠造口术,和tecovirimat抗性。放射学非液化性直肠周围脓肿提出了诊断挑战,突显了免疫功能低下个体中侵袭性猴痘表现的复杂性。
    This severe monkeypox case described a 23-year-old male with advanced HIV-1 disease presenting perirectal abscess, extensive anal ulcerative lesions requiring colostomy, and tecovirimat resistance. Radiologically non-liquefied perirectal abscess presented diagnostic challenges highlighting the complexity of aggressive monkeypox manifestations in immunocompromised individuals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的: 评估腹腔镜造口旁疝修补联合腹壁及腹膜外造口重建——“D式造口旁疝修补术”在永久性乙状结肠造口后造口旁疝中的可行性。 方法: 采用回顾性观察性研究的方法,纳入疝脱出物还纳困难、有发生急性嵌顿和绞窄性肠梗阻危险以及严重影响患者的美观和生活质量、严重影响造口护理的患者。排除随访期内肿瘤复发和(或)新发以及失访者。回顾性分析2020年6月至2022年8月江苏省苏北人民医院连续收治的25例永久性乙状结肠造口后造口旁疝患者的临床资料,其中男性9例,女性16例,年龄(66.7±8.6)岁。D式造口旁疝修补术操作步骤:腹腔镜下回纳疝内容物,清除疝囊并在保护系膜血管弓的情况下游离脾区肠管;原造口开腹下操作,松懈肠管并清除腹腔镜下无法操作的疝囊组织;于原造口外上行腹膜外造口;关闭原造口。观察患者术中、术后及随访情况。 结果: 全组25例患者均顺利完成手术,无术中严重并发症的发生,手术时间为(128.4±32.3)min,术中失血量(58.0±13.6)ml,术后首次肛门排气时间(21.8±4.7)h。术后住院时间(7±2)d,住院费用(2.4±0.2)万元。术后共出现3例(12.0%)短期并发症:其中切口感染、造口回缩和缺血各1例。6例(24.0%)发生长期并发症,其中术后慢性疼痛5例(20.0%),部分肠梗阻1例(4.0%),均经保守治疗后改善。 结论: D式造口旁疝修补术用于造口旁疝修补联合腹壁及腹膜外造口重建安全可行。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    先天性巨结肠病,一种影响肠神经系统的罕见遗传疾病,其特征在于肌间神经丛中不存在神经节细胞。由于未能通过胎粪,通常在新生儿中发现,超过生命第一年的诊断被认为是延迟的。晚发型先天性巨结肠患儿的常见临床表现包括腹胀、腹痛,呕吐,发烧,和异常的肠鸣音。乙状结肠扭转,虽然不常见,会使先天性巨结肠疾病复杂化,可能导致误诊和严重并发症,如肠穿孔,出血,脓毒症,甚至死亡率。非手术干预措施,如抗生素治疗,肠减压,液体复苏是稳定患者的首选初始治疗方法。此案涉及一名9岁男孩,自出生以来就出现腹胀和长期的不规则排便习惯。我们机构确认了先天性巨结肠病的诊断,病人接受了两阶段的修复手术,完成,没有任何术中或术后并发症。病人恢复顺利,已出院,生命体征稳定,恢复了正常的肠道功能.此病例突出了九年延迟诊断的挑战,并强调了迅速管理的重要性。
    Hirschsprung disease, a rare genetic disorder affecting the enteric nervous system, is characterized by the absence of ganglion cells in the myenteric plexus. Typically identified in neonates due to the failure to pass meconium, diagnosis beyond the first year of life is considered delayed. Common clinical manifestations in children with late-onset Hirschsprung disease include abdominal distension, abdominal pain, vomiting, fever, and abnormal bowel sounds. Sigmoid volvulus, though uncommon, can complicate Hirschsprung disease, potentially leading to misdiagnosis and severe complications such as intestinal perforation, hemorrhage, sepsis, and even mortality. Non-surgical interventions such as antibiotic therapy, intestinal decompression, and fluid resuscitation are preferred initial treatments to stabilize the patient. This case involves a 9-year-old boy who has presented with abdominal distension since birth and a lengthy history of irregular bowel habits. The diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease was confirmed at our institution, and the patient underwent a two-stage repair procedure, which was completed without any intraoperative or postoperative complications. The patient experienced an uneventful recovery, was discharged with stable vital signs, and regained normal bowel function. This case highlights the challenges of delayed diagnosis at nine years and underscores the importance of prompt management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    此病例报告概述了31岁女性激光痔成形术后直肠穿孔的复杂处理,导致急腹症,脓毒症,多器官衰竭。进行了紧急的腹腔镜探查和双回路结肠造口术的建立。标志着以复发性盆腔败血症为特征的复杂病程的开始。激光痔成形术因其在治疗痔疮方面的微创方法而获得了广泛的接受。值得注意的是,根据我们的知识,我们介绍的病例是激光痔成形术后报告的第一个主要并发症,可能归因于附带的热和机械组织损伤。
    This case report outlines the intricate management of rectal perforation following laser hemorrhoidoplasty in a 31-year-old female, leading to an acute abdomen, sepsis, and multiorgan failure. Urgent laparoscopic exploration and the establishment of a double-loop colostomy were undertaken, marking the beginning of a complex course characterized by relapsed pelvic sepsis. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty has gained widespread acceptance for its minimally invasive approach in treating hemorrhoids. Remarkably, to our knowledge, the case we present is the first major complication reported after laser hemorrhoidoplasty, likely attributed to collateral thermic and mechanical tissue damage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:造口术是一种常见的程序,对患者和医疗保健专业人员提出了各种挑战。有许多指南解决不同的造口术相关问题(ORP),并支持造口术护理的跨学科方法。但缺乏优化造口术后药物治疗的循证文献.
    目的:研究和表征与药物治疗相关的典型ORP,并从药学角度提供最佳实践建议。
    方法:回肠或结肠造口术患者连续纳入前瞻性研究,住院期间的介入单中心队列研究,特别注意药物治疗。临床药剂师通过进行3级药物审查和患者访谈来评估DRP。药剂师干预措施(PI)由两名高级临床药剂师进行评估,并记录在DokuPIK(医院药剂师干预措施文件)中。在跨学科讨论之后,医师接受或拒绝了药物治疗的建议变化.比较了回肠造口术和结肠造口术患者的PI类型和程度。
    结果:在纳入队列的80名患者中,54(67.5%)进行了回肠造口术,26(32.5%)进行了结肠造口术。在这项研究中,记录了288个PI(234个回肠造口术与54结肠造口术),其中94.0%被医生接受和实施。在两个亚组中,PI的最常见原因(29.6%回肠造口术与26.1%的结肠造口术)是一种缺失的药物,尽管有指示(例如没有洛哌丁胺,但气孔输出较高)。回肠造口患者与造口相关的PI比例较高(48.3%回肠造口与31.5%结肠造口术;p=0.025)。提取并分析了典型的ORP作为案例研究,包括对其各自管理和预防的建议。
    结论:这项研究强调了临床药师作为跨学科团队的一部分的重要性,以合作改善造口护理和患者安全。尤其是回肠造口术患者在药物治疗的背景下更容易受到ORP的影响,需要仔细监测。
    BACKGROUND: Ostomy surgery is a common procedure that poses various challenges for patients and healthcare professionals. There are numerous guidelines addressing different ostomy-related problems (ORPs) and supporting an interdisciplinary approach for ostomy care, but evidence-based literature for optimizing drug therapy after ostomy surgery is lacking.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate and characterize typical ORPs in relation to drug therapy and provide best practice recommendations from a pharmaceutical point of view.
    METHODS: Patients with an ileo- or colostomy were consecutively enrolled in a prospective, interventional monocentric cohort study during hospitalization, with particular attention to medication. A clinical pharmacist assessed DRPs by performing level 3 medication reviews and patient interviews. Pharmacists\' interventions (PIs) were evaluated by two senior clinical pharmacists and documented in DokuPIK (Documentation of Pharmacists\' Interventions in the Hospital). Following interdisciplinary discussions, physicians either accepted or rejected the proposed changes in drug therapy. Comparisons were made between ileostomy and colostomy patients regarding type and extent of PIs.
    RESULTS: Out of the 80 patients included in the cohort, 54 (67.5%) had an ileostomy and 26 (32.5%) a colostomy. In this study, 288 PIs were documented (234 ileostomy vs. 54 colostomy), of wich 94.0% were accepted and implemented by the physicians. The most common reason for PIs in both subgroups (29.6% ileostomy vs. 26.1% colostomy) was a missing drug although indicated (e.g. no loperamide, but high stoma output). The proportion of PIs associated with the ostomy was higher in ileostomy patients (48.3% ileostomy vs. 31.5% colostomy; p = 0.025). Typical ORPs were extracted and analyzed as case studies including recommendations for their respective management and prevention.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of clinical pharmacists being a part of interdisciplinary teams to collaboratively improve ostomy care and patient safety. Especially ileostomy patients are more vulnerable for ORPs in the context of drug therapy and need to be monitored carefully.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Fournier坏疽(FG)是一种罕见且严重的疾病,与高死亡率有关。在文学中,没有研究评估临床医生-,根据FG的病因变异,影响疾病结局的患者和疾病相关因素。在我们的研究中,实验室结果和UludagFournier坏疽严重程度指数(UFGSI)评分,比较了源自肛周或泌尿生殖区域的FG的临床特征和死亡率.
    血小板与淋巴细胞的比率,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比率,在FG患者到急诊科就诊时,计算坏死性筋膜炎的实验室风险指标(LRINEC)和UFGSI风险评分。根据FG病因将患者分为两组。
    据观察,在肛周FG组中,清创干预措施的数量和结肠造口的需求显着增加,而泌尿生殖系统FG组的皮瓣或重建需求显着增加(p=0.002)。各组间死亡率无显著差异,病因学差异对中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值的结果无显著影响,LRINEC或UFGSI分数。
    实验室结果和UFGSI评分有助于独立于病因评估疾病严重程度。肛周组保护肛门功能的清创干预措施数量较多,泌尿生殖系统组需要进行重建手术,这被认为是延长住院时间的因素。
    UNASSIGNED: Fournier\'s gangrene (FG) is a rare and serious disorder which is associated with high mortality. In the literature, there is no study evaluating clinician-, patient- and disease-related factors affecting disease outcomes according to aetiological variation in FG. In our study, laboratory results and Uludag Fournier\'s Gangrene Severity Index (UFGSI) score, clinical characteristics and mortality rates were compared between FG originating from perianal or from urogenital regions.
    UNASSIGNED: Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) and UFGSI risk scores were calculated in patients with FG at presentation to the emergency department. The patients were assigned to two groups according to FG aetiology.
    UNASSIGNED: It was observed that the number of debridement interventions and the need for colostomy were significantly greater in the perianal FG group, while the need for flap or reconstruction was significantly (p=0.002) higher in the genitourinary FG group. No significant difference was detected in mortality between groups and the difference in aetiology had no significant effect on the results of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, LRINEC or UFGSI scores.
    UNASSIGNED: Laboratory results and UFGSI score were helpful in assessing disease severity independently from aetiology. The higher number of debridement interventions to protect anal function in the perianal group and the greater need for reconstructive surgery in the urogenital group were identified as factors that prolonged length of hospital stay.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号