背景:非药物干预具有无数可用的干预选择,并且包含多种成分。非药物干预或组合的特定成分是否优于其他成分尚不清楚。这项研究的主要目的是比较非药物干预措施的不同组合及其特定成分对主观认知能力下降的成年人与健康相关的结果的影响。
方法:PubMed,Embase,科克伦,CINAHL,PsycINFO,中部,WebofScience,和中国最大的两个数据库,CNKI和万方,从开始到22日被搜索,2023年1月。包括使用非药物干预措施并报告主观认知能力下降的成年人的健康结果的随机对照试验。两名独立审稿人筛选了研究,提取的数据,并评估偏见的风险。成分网络荟萃分析采用加性成分模型进行网络荟萃分析。本研究遵循PRISMA报告指南,PRISMA清单见附加文件2。
结果:共纳入39项试验,共2959名患者(平均年龄范围,58.79-77.41年)。抵抗运动可能是减少主观认知能力下降的成年人的记忆力抱怨的最佳干预措施;累积排名p得分下的表面为0.888,其次是平衡运动(p=0.859)。有氧运动(p=0.832),和认知干预(p=0.618)。音乐疗法,认知训练,经颅直流电刺激,正念疗法,和平衡练习可能是改善全球认知功能的最有效干预成分(iSMD,0.83;95%CI,0.36至1.29),语言(iSMD,0.31;95%CI,0.24至0.38),执行日常生活活动的能力(iSMD,0.55;95%CI,0.21至0.89),身体健康(iSMD,3.29;95%CI,2.57至4.00),和焦虑缓解(iSMD,0.71;95%CI,0.26至1.16),分别。
结论:对于患有主观认知功能下降的成年人,进行的身体活动形式似乎比认知干预更有利于减少主观记忆投诉。这种差异反映在抵抗上,有氧,平衡练习。高质量和大规模的随机临床试验是必要的,以验证研究结果。
背景:PROSPERO注册表号。CRD420223555363。
BACKGROUND: Non-pharmacological interventions have a myriad of available intervention options and contain multiple components. Whether specific components of non-pharmacological interventions or combinations are superior to others remains unclear. The main aim of this study is to compare the effects of different combinations of non-pharmacological interventions and their specific components on health-related outcomes in adults with subjective cognitive decline.
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and China\'s two largest databases, CNKI and Wanfang, were searched from inception to 22nd, January 2023. Randomized controlled trials using non-pharmacological interventions and reporting health outcomes in adults with subjective cognitive decline were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Component network meta-analysis was conducted employing an additive component model for network meta-analysis. This study followed the PRISMA reporting guideline and the PRISMA checklist is presented in Additional file 2.
RESULTS: A total of 39 trials with 2959 patients were included (range of mean ages, 58.79-77.41 years). Resistance exercise might be the optimal intervention for reducing memory complaints in adults with subjective cognitive decline; the surface under the cumulative ranking p score was 0.888, followed by balance exercise (p = 0.859), aerobic exercise (p = 0.832), and cognitive interventions (p = 0.618). Music therapy, cognitive training, transcranial direct current stimulation, mindfulness therapy, and balance exercises might be the most effective intervention components for improving global cognitive function (iSMD, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.29), language (iSMD, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.38), ability to perform activities of daily living (iSMD, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.89), physical health (iSMD, 3.29; 95% CI, 2.57 to 4.00), and anxiety relief (iSMD, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.16), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The form of physical activity performed appears to be more beneficial than cognitive interventions in reducing subjective memory complaints for adults with subjective cognitive decline, and this difference was reflected in resistance, aerobic, and balance exercises. Randomized clinical trials with high-quality and large-scale are warranted to validate the findings.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO registry number. CRD42022355363.