BACKGROUND: Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) is an odontogenic carcinoma characterized by sheets and islands of vacuolated and clear cells. The diagnosis of atypical CCOC can pose a challenge when tumor cells deviate from their characteristic clear morphology, even with the aid of genetic profiling for CCOC identification.
METHODS: In this manuscript, we detailed the inaugural instance of a recurrently recurring clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) with pronounced squamous differentiation in a 64-year-old male. The primary tumor in this individual initially displayed a biphasic clear cell phenotype. However, subsequent to the third recurrence, the clear tumor cells were entirely supplanted by epidermoid cells characterized by eosinophilic cytoplasm, vesicular chromatin, and prominent nucleoli. Notable aggressive attributes such as necrosis, conspicuous cytological malignancy, perineural dissemination, and vascular invasion were noted. Additionally, the tumor progressed to manifest lung metastases. The tumor cells exhibited positive immunoreactivity for AE1/AE3, KRT19, Pan-CK, EMA, P40, P63, CK34βE12, and P53, while they tested negative for CK35βH11, KRT7, S-100, and neuroendocrine markers. The Ki-67 proliferation index was calculated at an average of 15%. Furthermore, FISH analysis unveiled the presence of the EWSR1::ATF1 gene fusion.
CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrated a rare and aggressive case of CCOC characterized by significant squamous differentiation upon recurrence of the tumor.

In the 2022, World Health Organisation classification of odontogenic tumours, the clear cell odontogenic carcinoma is designated as a malignant odontogenic tumour with high recurrence and aggressive behaviour. Deceptive behaviour in the context of a wide range of differentials presents a significant diagnostic problem. It is the fifth most commom type of malignant odontogenic tumor. A systematic assessment of published cases, case series, and retrospective investigations of diagnostic significance of EWSR1 gene in clear cell odontogenic carcinoma is presented to determine trends in presentation, diagnostic characteristics, treatment, and patient outcome. To locate papers reporting clear cell odontogenic carcinoma and EWSR1, extensive database searches were carried out. Demographics, tumour location, immunohistochemical and molecular tests, treatment, follow-up, and recurrence were the variables. 34 cases were detected; 52.9% (n = 18) of the cases were females. The average age was 62.5 years, with a range of 43-82 years. The average size ranged from 3.4 to 8 cm. The mandibular body was the most common location, followed by the maxilla. Maximum immunohistochemistry positivity revealed by CK 19, CKAE1/3, EMA and p63. Most common gene fusion detected was EWSR1-ATF1 in 62.4% of cases contributing to its diagnostic attributes. Surgical treatment was used in 97% of cases. The average follow-up period was 30.3 months, and recurrence was reported in 52.4% of the cases. CCOC can metastasize, and the prognosis is fair. This is first systematic review, where we have attempted to consolidate the mutational expression of EWSR1 in Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma. It is difficult to identify from other clear cell tumours of the head and neck region. It is crucial to distinguish it from other clear cell lesions because of its aggressiveness.

OBJECTIVE: To review tumors identified as \"clear cell sarcoma\" in order to determine similarities to the rare EWS fusion positive jaw and salivary gland tumors clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) and clear cell carcinoma of the salivary gland (CCC).
METHODS: PubMed was used to collect all reports of clear cell sarcoma (CCS). Search parameters were \"clear cell sarcoma\" and \"CCS.\" References in the publications were screened and cross-referenced. Data extracted included demographic characteristics, presenting signs and symptoms, radiographic findings, histological and immunohistochemical features and known molecular/genetic aberrations.
RESULTS: Clear cell sarcoma has several similarities to CCOC and CCC. All three tumor types have similar histologic appearances including the presence of clear cells, as well as similar genetic profiles in that all harbor an EWSR1-CREB family fusions. Additionally, these tumors appear in soft tissue as well as bone, and can have a prolonged clinical course. CCS can appear anywhere in the body, including the head and neck region. All three tumors appear to have a predilection to women, although CCS may have a slight younger age of onset as compared to CCOC and CCC (3rd vs 5th decade of life, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Gaining a better understanding of the similarities and differences between these three tumors may lead to a better understanding of each one.

Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) is a rare epithelial malignant odontogenic tumor of the jaw with a distinct histology and deceptive behavior. As the clinical presentation is often misleading, the contribution of biopsy, molecular biology, immunohistochemistry and cytogenetics are essential in the diagnostic process. This article describes the presentation of an aymptomatic, painless swelling in the lower jaw of a 63 yrs old female, who was initially diagnosed as an ameloblastoma, taken up for segmental resection, subsequently histopathologically diagnosed as a case of clear cell odontogenic carcinoma and later managed with chemotherapy. Current management protocols and presentation of CCOC have also been reviewed.

暂无摘要。

Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) is a rare odontogenic neoplasm with high risk of recurrence and aggressive behaviour. Presence of clear cells in head and neck is hallmark, but not pathognomic for the entity. Deceptive behaviour admist wide range of differentials, poses an immense diagnostic challenge. An incisional biopsy with appropriate immunohistochemistry is prudent for diagnosis. We herein report atypical case of CCOC mimicking squamous cell carcinoma, in a tertiary cancer center in North Eastern part of India.

Both clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) and sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma (SOC) are rare odontogenic malignancies. Here, we report a case of maxillary CCOC whose clinical and histologic features resembled those of SOC. Radiologically, the tumor presented as an ill-defined, expansile radiolucency with local bone destruction. Histologically, the tumor was comprised of thin cords or strands of odontogenic epithelium permeating through a sclerosed fibrous stroma with occasional clear cell foci. It damaged the cortical plates and invaded the adjacent soft tissue. Immunohistochemical expression of Pancytokeratin, Cytokeratin 19, p63, Cytokeratin 5/6, and Cytokeratin 14, as well as focal expression of Cytokeratin 7, demonstrated the epithelial nature of the tumor. Alcian Blue Periodic acid Schiff staining revealed a lack of intracellular mucin. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed Ewing sarcoma RNA binding protein 1 and activating transcription factor 1 gene translocation, further confirming the diagnosis of CCOC. Lastly, we contextualized the genetic analysis of our case to that of CCOC in the literature.

BACKGROUND: Homeobox genes play crucial roles in tooth morphogenesis and development and thus mutations in homeobox genes cause developmental disorders such as odontogenic lesions. The aim of this scoping review is to identify and compile available data from the literatures on the topic of homeobox gene expression in odontogenic lesions.
METHODS: An electronic search to collate all the information on studies on homeobox gene expression in odontogenic lesions was carried out in four databases (PubMed, EBSCO host, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) with selected keywords. All papers which reported expression of homeobox genes in odontogenic lesions were considered.
RESULTS: A total of eleven (11) papers describing expression of homeobox genes in odontogenic lesions were identified. Methods of studies included next generation sequencing, microarray analysis, RT-PCR, Western blotting, in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry. The homeobox reported in odontogenic lesions includes LHX8 and DLX3 in odontoma; PITX2, MSX1, MSX2, DLX, DLX2, DLX3, DLX4, DLX5, DLX6, ISL1, OCT4 and HOX C in ameloblastoma; OCT4 in adenomatoid odontogenic tumour; PITX2 and MSX2 in primordial odontogenic tumour; PAX9 and BARX1 in odontogenic keratocyst; PITX2, ZEB1 and MEIS2 in ameloblastic carcinoma while there is absence of DLX2, DLX3 and MSX2 in clear cell odontogenic carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: This paper summarized and reviews the possible link between homeobox gene expression in odontogenic lesions. Based on the current available data, there are insufficient evidence to support any definite role of homeobox gene in odontogenic lesions.

Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma is a rare malignancy, which is vary in behavior from indolent tumor to cases with frequent recurrence and rare metastasis. In this manuscript, we report a case of clear cell odontogenic carcinoma of right lower mandible with cervical lymph node metastasis in a 50-year-old female. The tumor recurred and metastasized to vertebra and pleura after adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy, and the patient died of the disease 29 months after diagnosis. Pathologically, the tumor was composed of epithelial nests dominated by clear cells with ameloblastoma-like pattern and biphasic pattern. The tumor cells showed strong positive for AE1/AE3, KRT19, KRT5/6, P63, focal positive for KRT7, and weak positive for MUC1. Molecularly, EWSR1::ATF1 gene fusion was identified. To our knowledge, this report describes the first case of metastasis of clear cell odontogenic carcinoma involving regional lymph nodes and distant pleural and vertebral areas, demonstrating an aggressive clinical course of clear cell odontogenic carcinoma.

Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) is a rare, aggressive epithelial neoplasm of the jaw first described in 1985 by Hansen and classified as an odontogenic malignant tumor in the 2005 WHO classification. To date, only 117 cases have been reported in the literature written in English. In this paper, we report the atypical presentation of a pericoronal localized tumor in the right mandibular wisdom tooth discovered during a routine radiologic examination. The patient, a 44-year-old healthy female, was referred by her general dental practitioner for examination of temporomandibular dysfunction and recurrent myofascial pain. Anamnesis and clinical examination did not suggest tumoral disease. The osteolytic lesion was removed, and histological examination revealed a clear cell odontogenic tumor (CCOT) of the right posterior lower jaw. Segmental lower jaw resection was performed, and a free iliac crest bone transplant was fixed with mandibular reconstruction plate. No cervical neck dissection was needed. A five-year follow-up examination shows excellent local and systemic recovery and no sign of tumor recurrence. The patient still suffers from bruxism and myofascial related pain, which are treated conservatively with a Michigan splint and physiotherapy. Based on this additional case, we review the literature and discuss the challenging diagnostic aspects, the unusual clinical presentation, and the treatment of CCOC.