Claims analysis

索赔分析
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    主要不良心血管事件(MACE)是成人2型糖尿病发病和死亡的主要原因。目前,可用的MACE预测模型有重要的局限性,包括对可能无法例行获得的数据的依赖,狭隘地关注一级预防,有限的患者群体,和风险预测的长期视野。
    这项研究的目的是得出并内部验证基于索赔的2型糖尿病1年MACE风险预测模型。
    使用2型糖尿病成年人的医疗和药学索赔,MedicareAdvantage,和医疗保险收费服务计划在2014年至2021年之间,我们推导并内部验证了基于年度索赔的MACE估计器(ACME)模型,以预测MACE的风险(非致死性急性心肌梗死,非致命性中风,和全因死亡率)。Cox比例风险模型由30个协变量组成,包括患者年龄,性别,合并症,和药物。
    研究队列包括6,623,526名2型糖尿病成年人,平均年龄68.1±10.6岁,妇女占49.8%,73.0%的非西班牙裔白人。ACME的一致性指数为0.74(验证指数范围:0.739-0.741)。研究队列的预测1年风险范围为0.4%至99.9%,风险中位数为3.4%(IQR:2.3%-6.5%)。
    ACME源于大量的常规护理人群,依赖于常规可用的数据,并估计短期MACE风险。它可以在卫生系统和支付者层面支持人口风险分层,心血管疾病分散临床试验的参与者识别,和使用真实世界数据的风险分层观察研究。
    UNASSIGNED: Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among adults with type 2 diabetes. Currently, available MACE prediction models have important limitations, including reliance on data that may not be routinely available, narrow focus on primary prevention, limited patient populations, and longtime horizons for risk prediction.
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to derive and internally validate a claims-based prediction model for 1-year risk of MACE in type 2 diabetes.
    UNASSIGNED: Using medical and pharmacy claims for adults with type 2 diabetes enrolled in commercial, Medicare Advantage, and Medicare fee-for-service plans between 2014 and 2021, we derived and internally validated the annualized claims-based MACE estimator (ACME) model to predict the risk of MACE (nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and all-cause mortality). The Cox proportional hazards model was composed of 30 covariates, including patient age, sex, comorbidities, and medications.
    UNASSIGNED: The study cohort comprised 6,623,526 adults with type 2 diabetes, mean age 68.1 ± 10.6 years, 49.8% women, and 73.0% Non-Hispanic White. ACME had a concordance index of 0.74 (validation index range: 0.739-0.741). The predicted 1-year risk of the study cohort ranged from 0.4% to 99.9%, with a median risk of 3.4% (IQR: 2.3%-6.5%).
    UNASSIGNED: ACME was derived in a large usual care population, relies on routinely available data, and estimates short-term MACE risk. It can support population risk stratification at the health system and payer levels, participant identification for decentralized clinical trials of cardiovascular disease, and risk-stratified observational studies using real-world data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    治疗牛皮癣患者的提供者在美国分布不均,城市多于农村地区。这项回顾性分析使用来自STATinMED数据库的数据,描述了美国银屑病患者在获得治疗方面的差异。
    在2015年1月至2019年12月期间,患者(≥18岁)的银屑病诊断索赔≥1例,晚期银屑病治疗(apremilast或生物制剂)索赔≥1例。使用当地0、1-2、3-4或≥5个提供者的患者比例来确定获得牛皮癣治疗的机会。
    总的来说,179,688例患者被纳入分析,城市地区占80.0%。内科医师的访问率最高(每1000名患者97.1名),皮肤科医师(每1000名患者4.4名)和家庭执业医师(每1000名患者3.9名)的访问率最低。在城市地区,41%的患者有≥5名皮肤科医生,而农村地区为7%。而城市地区有2%的患者寻求当地以外的治疗,农村地区有75%的人这样做。所有州使用先进疗法的比例都很低(<17%)。
    获得牛皮癣治疗提供者的途径差异很大。不管访问,先进治疗的利用率低,表明需要有效的,易于管理的治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: Providers who treat patients with psoriasis are unevenly distributed across the United States, with more in urban than rural areas. This retrospective claims analysis characterized disparities in access to care for US patients with psoriasis using data from the STATinMED database.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients (≥18 years) had ≥1 claim with a psoriasis diagnosis and ≥1 claim for advanced psoriasis therapy (apremilast or biologics) between January 2015 and December 2019. Access to psoriasis care was determined using the proportion of patients with 0, 1-2, 3-4, or ≥5 providers in their local area.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, 179,688 patients were included in the analysis, 80.0% in urban areas. The access ratio was highest for internal medicine physicians (97.1 per 1000 patients) and lowest for dermatologists (4.4 per 1000 patients) and family practice physicians (3.9 per 1000 patients). In urban areas, 41% of patients had access to ≥5 dermatologists versus 7% in rural areas. Whereas 2% of patients in urban areas sought care outside of their local area, 75% in rural areas did so. Use of advanced therapies was low in all states (<17%).
    UNASSIGNED: Access to psoriasis-treating providers varied widely. Regardless of access, utilization of advanced treatments was low, suggesting the need for effective, easy-to-administer therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多发性硬化症(pwMS)患者有同时使用多种中枢神经系统(CNS)活性药物的风险,然而,在pwMS中,CNS活性多重用药的患病率仍未被测量.
    目的是测量pwMS中CNS活性多重用药的患病率。
    此系列,横断面研究使用保险索赔数据测量了2008年至2021年美国MS患者的CNS活性多重用药。CNS活性多重用药被定义为连续30天以上的3种CNS活性药物的并发处方。中枢神经系统活性药物包括抗抑郁药,抗癫痫药,抗精神病药,苯二氮卓类药物,非苯并二氮杂苯并二氮杂受体激动剂催眠药,阿片类药物,和骨骼肌松弛剂.
    每个时间点包括的受试者数量从2008年的23,917名受试者到2021年的55,797名受试者不等。2021年,与没有CNS活性多重用药的受试者相比,具有CNS活性多重用药的受试者年龄在46-65岁之间,并且患有CNS相关的合并症。从2008年到2021年,女性受试者中中枢神经系统活性多重用药的年龄校正患病率从19.8%(95%置信区间(CI)=19.1-20.4)增加到26.4%(95%CI=25.9-26.8),男性受试者中的15.9%(95%CI=14.8-17.0)至18.6%(95%CI=17.9-19.2)。
    在MS患者中,中枢神经系统活性多重用药的患病率有所增加,性别差异越来越大。
    UNASSIGNED: People with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) are at risk of concurrently using multiple central nervous system (CNS)-active drugs, yet the prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy remains unmeasured in pwMS.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective is to measure the prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy in pwMS.
    UNASSIGNED: This serial, cross-sectional study measured CNS-active polypharmacy in people with MS in the United States from 2008 to 2021 using insurance claims data. CNS-active polypharmacy was defined as the concurrent prescription of ⩾3 CNS-active drugs for >30 continuous days. CNS-active drugs included antidepressants, antiepileptics, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, nonbenzodiazepine benzodiazepine receptor agonist hypnotics, opioids, and skeletal muscle relaxants.
    UNASSIGNED: The number of subjects included at each time point ranged from 23,917 subjects in 2008 to 55,797 subjects in 2021. In 2021, subjects with CNS-active polypharmacy were more likely to be 46-65 years of age and have CNS-related comorbidities compared to those without CNS-active polypharmacy. From 2008 to 2021, the age-adjusted prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy among female subjects increased from 19.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 19.1-20.4) to 26.4% (95% CI = 25.9-26.8) versus 15.9% (95% CI = 14.8-17.0) to 18.6% (95% CI = 17.9-19.2) in male subjects.
    UNASSIGNED: The prevalence of CNS-active polypharmacy has increased among people with MS with a growing disparity by sex.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:X连锁肌管肌病(XLMTM)是一种罕见的,危及生命的先天性疾病,这不是明确定义的。据我们所知,在巴西,尚未进行描述XLMTM疾病负担的研究。我们使用巴西公共医疗系统的行政索赔数据识别和描述了疑似XLMTM患者。
    方法:从DATASUS数据库中提取2015年至2019年的数据。由于没有XLMTM特定的ICD-10代码可用,通过选择患有先天性肌病(G71.2)的男性患者,应用逐步算法来识别疑似XLMTM的患者。在索引日期年龄<18岁(G71.2的第一次索赔),与相关的诊断程序(肌肉活检/基因测试),没有脊髓性肌萎缩或Duchenne肌营养不良。我们试图根据呼吸和喂养支持的使用来识别疑似严重XLMTM的患者。这在XLMTM患者的护理中几乎是普遍的。对总体队列进行分析,并在指数日期<5岁和≥5岁时按年龄分层。
    结果:在173名疑似XLMTM患者中,39%的人在指数日小于5岁。几乎所有(N=166)患者(96%)均通过肌肉活检诊断(91%的患者<5岁,99%的患者≥5岁)。通过临床评估诊断出6例(3.5%)(8%的患者<5岁,1%的患者≥5岁),一个是通过基因测试确诊的.大多数患者居住在巴西利亚(n=55),圣保罗(n=33)和米纳斯吉拉斯州(n=27)。超过85%的<5岁的患者和大约75%的≥5岁的患者在指数日接受了物理治疗。在这两个年龄组中,近50%的患者需要住院治疗,25%的患者需要移动支持.3%和12%的患者需要呼吸和喂养支持,分别,提示5至21例患者可能患有严重的XLMTM。
    结论:在这项现实世界的研究中,XLMTM基因检测在巴西似乎未得到充分利用,可能导致该病的诊断不足.在拥有专门诊所和医院的特定地区之外,获得诊断和护理的机会有限。医疗资源的大量使用包括住院,物理治疗,移动性支持,and,在较小程度上,喂养支持和呼吸支持。
    BACKGROUND: X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM) is a rare, life-threatening congenital disease, which is not well-defined. To our knowledge, no studies characterizing the XLMTM disease burden have been conducted in Brazil. We identified and described patients with suspected XLMTM using administrative claims data from the Brazilian public healthcare system.
    METHODS: Data from 2015 to 2019 were extracted from the DATASUS database. As no XLMTM-specific ICD-10 code was available, a stepwise algorithm was applied to identify patients with suspected XLMTM by selecting male patients with a congenital myopathies code (G71.2), aged < 18 years at index date (first claim of G71.2), with an associated diagnostic procedure (muscle biopsy/genetic test) and without spinal muscular atrophy or Duchenne muscular dystrophy. We attempted to identify patients with suspected severe XLMTM based on use of both respiratory and feeding support, which are nearly universal in the care of XLMTM patients. Analyses were performed for the overall cohort and stratified by age at index date < 5 years old and ≥ 5 years old.
    RESULTS: Of 173 patients with suspected XLMTM identified, 39% were < 5 years old at index date. Nearly all (N = 166) patients (96%) were diagnosed by muscle biopsy (91% of patients < 5 years old and 99% of patients ≥ 5 years old), six (3.5%) were diagnosed by clinical evaluation (8% of patients < 5 years old and 1% of patients ≥ 5 years old), and one was diagnosed by a genetic test. Most patients lived in Brasilia (n = 55), São Paulo (n = 33) and Minas Gerais (n = 27). More than 85% of patients < 5 years old and approximately 75% of patients ≥ 5 years old had physiotherapy at the index date. In both age groups, nearly 50% of patients required hospitalization at some point and 25% required mobility support. Respiratory and feeding support were required for 3% and 12% of patients, respectively, suggesting that between 5 and 21 patients may have had severe XLMTM.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, genetic testing for XLMTM appears to be underutilized in Brazil and may contribute to underdiagnosis of the disease. Access to diagnosis and care is limited outside of specific regions with specialized clinics and hospitals. Substantial use of healthcare resources included hospitalization, physiotherapy, mobility support, and, to a lesser extent, feeding support and respiratory support.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    治疗静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的不同再灌注治疗方法的数量已大大增加。然而,对管理数据库中数据代表性和设备级使用的调查受到限制。使用国家住院患者样本(NIS)和PINCAI医疗保健数据库(PHD),在2016年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间,所有符合VTE诊断代码的医院均被确认.随着时间的推移,评估了患者的人口统计学和治疗方式的趋势。开发了一种算法来识别PHD队列中用于VTE治疗的特定设备。在NIS(肺栓塞(PE):88,725;孤立的DVT(iDVT):57,145)和PHD(PE:25,383;iDVT:13,928)中鉴定了145,870例接受再灌注治疗的VTE患者。NIS和PHD患者的人口统计学在质量上相似。随着时间的推移,在PE和iDVT人群中,机械血栓切除术(MT)的使用显著增加(两个数据库中p<0.05),而在PE中,导管溶栓(CDT)的使用达到平稳(分别在NIS和PHD中p=0.83和p=0.14),在iDVT人群中,机械血栓切除术(MT)的使用显著减少(两个数据库中p<0.05).在博士队列中,在14,105例患者中确定了特定的再灌注装置(PE:9,098;iDVT:5,007).总之,随着时间的推移,MT用于治疗VTE的使用有所增加,而CDT治疗的比率仍然停滞或下降。需要进一步的研究来了解这些治疗方式的吸收以及PHD研究VTE人群中特定设备治疗的独特能力。
    The number of different methods of reperfusion therapy to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE) has increased substantially. Nevertheless, investigation of data representativeness and device-level use in administrative databases has been limited. Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the PINC AI Healthcare Database (PHD), all hospital encounters with a diagnosis code of VTE were identified between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020. Patient demographics and trends in treatment modalities were evaluated over time. An algorithm was developed to identify specific devices used for VTE treatment in the PHD cohort. A total of 145,870 patients with VTE treated with reperfusion therapy were identified in the NIS (pulmonary embolism [PE] 88,725, isolated deep vein thrombosis [iDVT] 57,145) and 39,311 in the PHD (PE 25,383, iDVT 13,928). Patient demographics were qualitatively similar in the NIS and PHD. Over time, there was a significant increase in the use of mechanical thrombectomy in the PE and iDVT populations (p <0.05 in both databases), with catheter-directed thrombolysis use plateauing in PE (p = 0.83 and p = 0.14 in NIS and PHD, respectively) and significantly decreasing for the iDVT population (p <0.05 in both databases). In the PHD cohort, specific reperfusion devices were identified in 14,105 patients (PE 9,098, iDVT 5,007). In conclusion, the use of mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of VTE has increased over time, whereas the rates of catheter-directed thrombolysis therapy have remained stagnant or decreased. Further research is needed to understand the uptake of these treatment modalities and the unique abilities of the PHD to study specific device therapy in the VTE population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:甲状旁腺功能减退症(HP)是一种罕见的内分泌疾病,通常由手术期间甲状旁腺的去除或损伤引起,并导致短暂性(tHP)或慢性(cHP)疾病。cHP与多种并发症和合并症相关;然而,经济负担没有得到很好的描述。本研究的目的是评估与术后cHP相关的医疗资源利用率(HCRU)和成本,使用tHP作为参考。
    方法:对美国索赔数据库的分析包括2014年10月至2019年12月期间接受HP保险索赔和甲状腺/颈部手术的患者。cHP定义为手术后≥6个月的HP索赔,tHP定义为手术后<6个月的HP索赔。cHP指数日期是他们的合格手术索赔后的第一个HP诊断索赔,而tHP指数日期是符合资格的手术索赔后的最后一次HP诊断索赔.患者在指数之前和之后至少1年连续入组。患者的人口统计学和临床特征,全因HCCU,和成本进行了描述性分析。所有原因的总费用计算为住院付款的总和,急诊科,办公室/诊所就诊,和药房。
    结果:共有1,406例cHP和773例tHP患者符合纳入标准。平均年龄(52.1岁cHP,53.5岁tHP)和女性代表(83.2%cHP,81.2%tHP)两组相似。cHP患者(23.6%)比tHP患者(5.3%)更普遍。在1-2年的随访期间,cHP患者住院率较高(17.4%),和急诊就诊(26.0%)比参照组-tHP患者(分别为14.4%和21.4%)。在那些住院的人中,cHP患者的平均住院次数高出1.5倍.cHP患者也看了更多的专家,包括内分泌学家(28.7%cHP,15.8%tHP),心脏病专家(16.7%cHP,9.7%tHP),和肾病学家(4.6%cHP,3.3%tHP)。
    结论:本研究表明,与tHP患者相比,cHP对医疗系统的医疗负担增加。需要有效的治疗选择,以最大程度地减少HP成为慢性患者的额外资源。
    BACKGROUND: Hypoparathyroidism (HP) is a rare endocrine disease commonly caused by the removal or damage of parathyroid glands during surgery and resulting in transient (tHP) or chronic (cHP) disease. cHP is associated with multiple complications and comorbid conditions; however, the economic burden has not been well characterized. The objective of this study was to evaluate the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with post-surgical cHP, using tHP as a reference.
    METHODS: This analysis of a US claims database included patients with both an insurance claim for HP and thyroid/neck surgery between October 2014 and December 2019. cHP was defined as an HP claim ≥ 6 months following surgery and tHP was defined as only one HP claim < 6 months following surgery. The cHP index date was the first HP diagnosis claim following their qualifying surgery claim, whereas the tHP index date was the last HP diagnosis claim following the qualifying surgery claim. Patients were continuously enrolled at least 1 year pre- and post-index. Patients\' demographic and clinical characteristics, all-cause HCRU, and costs were descriptively analyzed. Total all-cause costs were calculated as the sum of payments for hospitalizations, emergency department, office/clinic visits, and pharmacy.
    RESULTS: A total of 1,406 cHP and 773 tHP patients met inclusion criteria. The average age (52.1 years cHP, 53.5 years tHP) and representation of females (83.2% cHP, 81.2% tHP) were similar for both groups. Neck dissection surgery was more prevalent in cHP patients (23.6%) than tHP patients (5.3%). During the 1-2 year follow-up period, cHP patients had a higher prevalence of inpatient admissions (17.4%), and emergency visits (26.0%) than the reference group -tHP patients (14.4% and 21.4% respectively). Among those with a hospitalization, the average number of hospitalizations was 1.5-fold higher for cHP patients. cHP patients also saw more specialists, including endocrinologists (28.7% cHP, 15.8% tHP), cardiologists (16.7% cHP, 9.7% tHP), and nephrologists (4.6% cHP, 3.3% tHP).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the increased healthcare burden of cHP on the healthcare system in contrast to patients with tHP. Effective treatment options are needed to minimize the additional resources utilized by patients whose HP becomes chronic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这份索赔分析中,与匹配的非VKC对照组相比,接受免疫调节剂或皮质类固醇治疗的春季角膜结膜炎(VKC)患者(≤18岁)的角膜并发症更多,眼科护理费用更高,表明需要更有效的治疗。
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    严重急性呼吸道综合症冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的爆发对医疗保健产生了影响。这项研究评估了SARS-CoV-2爆发对2型糖尿病患者门诊就诊的影响,并确定了受影响最大的人群。我们分析了台湾的国民健康保险数据,包括2018年至2021年诊断为2型糖尿病的1,922,702名患者。基于小组的轨迹建模确定了四种不同的门诊就诊模式,即,始终较高(第1组,74.2%),从低到高(第二组,8.1%),高到低(第3组,6.0%)和持续低(第4组,11.7%)利用率。使用Logistic回归分析轨迹类型与患者人口统计学和健康状况之间的相关性。第3组成员成为男性的几率更高[调整后的优势比(aOR)=1.04,95%置信区间(CI)1.03-1.05],并且每月收入低于20,000新台币(aOR=1.29,95%CI1.26-1.31)。然而,他们不太可能在80岁以下(aOR=0.70-0.97),来自中等家庭收入地区(aOR=0.81-0.89)或Charlson合并症指数评分>2(aOR=0.67,95%CI0.66-0.68).富裕地区收入较低的患者进入第3组的可能性最高。在大流行期间,2型糖尿病患者和富裕地区的低收入患者很脆弱。这一结果强调,在此类危机期间,需要为该分组提供资源和支持。
    The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak posed impact on healthcare. This study evaluated the effect of SARS-CoV-2 outbreak on the outpatient visits of patients with type 2 diabetes and determined the most affected groups. We analyzed Taiwan\'s National Health Insurance data, including 1,922,702 patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes from 2018 to 2021. Group-based trajectory modelling identified four distinct outpatient visit patterns, namely, consistently high (Group 1, 74.2%), low-to-high (Group 2, 8.1%), high-to-low (Group 3, 6.0%) and consistently low (Group 4, 11.7%) utilization. Logistic regression was used to analyze correlations between trajectory types and patients\' demographics and health statuses. Group 3 members had higher odds of being male [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05] and earning below 20,000 New Taiwan Dollar monthly (aOR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.26-1.31) than those in Group 1. However, they were less likely to be under 80 years old (aOR = 0.70-0.97), from lower median family income regions (aOR = 0.81-0.89) or possess a Charlson Comorbidity Index score > 2 (aOR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.66-0.68). Patients with lower income in affluent areas displayed the highest likelihood of falling into Group 3. Patients with type 2 diabetes and low income from wealthy areas were vulnerable during the pandemic. This result emphasizes the need to target resources and support for this subgroup during such crises.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    衰弱是死亡率的重要预测指标,医疗保健成本和利用率,和健康结果。在临床接触期间,未收集到验证的虚弱措施,进行不同人群的比较具有挑战性。然而,已经开发了几种基于索赔的算法来预测脆弱和相关概念。本研究比较了医疗保险受益人中三种此类算法的性能。在2014-2016年期间,选择了来自12个月连续注册期的索赔数据。脆弱的分数,使用Faurot先前开发的算法计算,Kim,还有兰德,被添加到基线回归模型中,以预测下一年测量的基于索赔的结果。计算每个模型和结果组合的均方根误差和受试者工作特征曲线下的面积,并在感兴趣的亚群中进行测试。总的来说,Kim模型在大多数结果中表现最好,指标、和亚群。卫生系统和研究人员可以使用Kim脆弱分数进行风险调整或有针对性的干预措施。
    Frailty is an important predictor of mortality, health care costs and utilization, and health outcomes. Validated measures of frailty are not consistently collected during clinical encounters, making comparisons across populations challenging. However, several claims-based algorithms have been developed to predict frailty and related concepts. This study compares performance of three such algorithms among Medicare beneficiaries. Claims data from 12-month continuous enrollment periods were selected during 2014-2016. Frailty scores, calculated using previously developed algorithms from Faurot, Kim, and RAND, were added to baseline regression models to predict claims-based outcomes measured in the following year. Root mean square error and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for each model and outcome combination and tested in subpopulations of interest. Overall, Kim models performed best across most outcomes, metrics, and subpopulations. Kim frailty scores may be used by health systems and researchers for risk adjustment or targeting interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号