背景:BCR::ABL1是慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)的标志,也见于急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)。BCR侧的大多数基因组断裂发生在两个区域-主要和次要-导致p210和p190融合蛋白,分别。
方法:通过多重长距离PCR或下一代测序技术,我们对971例患者(成人和儿童,CML和ALL:小儿ALL:n=353;小儿CML:n=197;成人ALL:n=166;成人CML:n=255患者),并设计了“Break-App”网络工具以实现断点的可视化和各种分析。皮尔森卡方检验,使用Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验和逻辑回归进行统计分析。
结果:详细分析显示两个BCR区域的断裂都是非随机分布的,而ABL1断裂分布更均匀。然而,我们发现CML和ALL之间的断裂分布存在显着差异。我们发现断点与任何类型的散布重复或DNA基序都没有关联。除了少数例外,融合的一级结构表明非同源末端连接负责BCR和ABL1基因融合。对453例患者的ABL1::BCR融合的分析显示大部分是平衡的易位,没有重大缺失或重复。
结论:综合来看,我们的数据表明物理共定位和染色质可及性,随着细胞的发育阶段而变化(因此ALL和CML之间的差异),比特定DNA基序的存在更重要的影响断点定位的因素。
BACKGROUND: The BCR::ABL1 is a hallmark of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and is also found in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Most genomic breaks on the BCR side occur in two regions - Major and minor - leading to p210 and p190 fusion proteins, respectively.
METHODS: By multiplex long-distance PCR or next-generation sequencing technology we characterized the BCR::ABL1 genomic fusion in 971 patients (adults and children, with CML and ALL: pediatric ALL: n = 353; pediatric CML: n = 197; adult ALL: n = 166; adult CML: n = 255 patients) and designed \"Break-App\" web tool to allow visualization and various analyses of the breakpoints. Pearson\'s Chi-Squared test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and logistic regression were used for statistical analyses.
RESULTS: Detailed analysis showed a non-random distribution of breaks in both BCR regions, whereas ABL1 breaks were distributed more evenly. However, we found a significant difference in the distribution of breaks between CML and ALL. We found no association of breakpoints with any type of interspersed repeats or DNA motifs. With a few exceptions, the primary structure of the fusions suggests non-homologous end joining being responsible for the BCR and ABL1 gene fusions. Analysis of reciprocal ABL1::BCR fusions in 453 patients showed mostly balanced translocations without major deletions or duplications.
CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our data suggest that physical colocalization and chromatin accessibility, which change with the developmental stage of the cell (hence the difference between ALL and CML), are more critical factors influencing breakpoint localization than presence of specific DNA motifs.