In 2010, the reporting of thrombotic adverse events for one subcutaneous and certain intravenous immunoglobulins (IGs) raised some concerns. In Europe, regulatory bodies rapidly revised compendial specifications for therapeutic IGs to ensure they do not exhibit thrombogenic (procoagulant) activity (PCA). At the global level, a working group (GWG) was launched with the aim of assessing PCA measurement methods and limits, considering results obtained by human IG manufacturers during in-process controls. The GWG created three dedicated subgroups to investigate the FXIa chromogenic assay, the non-activated partial thromboplastin time (NAPTT) test and the thrombin generation assay (TGA). The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) was responsible for co-ordinating the subgroup in charge of evaluating the FXIa chromogenic assay in a study that assessed the sensitivity and robustness of two commercial chromogenic FXIa test kits. The impact of IG product formulation on FXIa recovery and the suitability of PCA-containing IG products as potential reference standards/controls were also assessed. IG materials representative of marketed products were provided to four laboratories for a study that was carried out in two steps: 1) two chromogenic FXIa test kit manufacturers assessed the performance and determined optimal test conditions by their respective methods, 2) two OMCLs studied both kits using an optimised study design. Regarding sensitivity, the study results identified suitable dose-response intervals and limits with both chromogenic FXIa test kits. This allowed the establishment of dilution ranges for optimal detection of FXIa/PCA in 5 % and 10 % IG products in the range of 1-6 mIU/mL. However, careful optimisation of the sample dilutions was required (notably to avoid potential matrix effects) and the choice of the mode of data acquisition (kinetic or end-point method) contributed to sensitivity in routine use. Importantly, the composition of IG products was of minor concern for FXIa determination with both test kits. Potential reference materials evaluated in the study behaved as expected and could be useful should a separate reference standard to the FXIa WHO IS be deemed necessary in future.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII) is a treatment option for break-through bleeds in patients with congenital haemophilia A with inhibitors (CHAwI) on emicizumab. However, there are limited data about the measurement of rpFVIII in the presence of emicizumab.
OBJECTIVE: To analyse whether rpFVIII can be measured with a chromogenic assay with bovine component (bCSA) in plasma from CHAwI on emicizumab treatment.
METHODS: In the first part of the study, FVIII deficient plasma was spiked with rpFVIII, in the second part, commercial plasma from CHAwI was spiked with emicizumab and rpFVIII, and in the third part, plasma from CHAwI on emicizumab treatment was spiked with rpFVIII. FVIII was then measured with bCSA and a chromogenic assay with human component (hCSA). Thrombin generation (TG) and clot-waveform analysis (CWA) were also carried out.
RESULTS: The recovery of rpFVIII measured with bCSA is approximately 80% and is further influenced by the presence of an anti-porcine inhibitor. rpFVIII assessed with hCSA was influenced by emicizumab. CWA and TG showed a weak correlation with baseline emicizumab concentration, but peak thrombin and CWA correlated well with increasing emicizumab concentrations and rpFVIII activities.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that rpFVIII can be measured in the presence of emicizumab with a bCSA. A calibration curve for the measurement of rpFVIII with bCSA should be established.

This chapter will describe a method for measuring endogenous and infused Factor VIII (FVIII) in patients on emicizumab therapy (Hemlibra, Genetec, Inc). Emicizumab is a bispecific monoclonal antibody used in patients with hemophilia A, with or without inhibitors. The mechanism of action for emicizumab is novel and mimics the role that FVIII plays in vivo by binding and bridging FIXa and FX. It is vital that the laboratory understands the effect this drug has on coagulation tests and uses a suitable chromogenic assay which is not affected by emicizumab, for determination of FVIII coagulant activity and inhibitors.

Protein C (PC) is a vitamin K-dependent zymogen synthesized in the liver that plays a major role in regulating the coagulation pathway. Upon interaction with the thrombin-thrombomodulin complex, PC is converted to its active form, activated PC (APC). APC complexes with protein S and regulates thrombin generation by the inactivation of Factors Va and VIIIa. The role of PC as a key regulator of the coagulation process is highlighted in the deficiency state, in which heterozygous deficiency of PC predisposes to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), while in the homozygous deficiency state, potentially fatal complications in the fetus including purpura fulminans and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) can occur. Protein C is often measured with other factors such as protein S and antithrombin as a screen in the investigation of VTE. The chromogenic PC assay, the protocol described in this chapter, quantitates the amount of functional PC in the plasma using an activator of PC with the degree of color change proportional to the amount of PC present in the sample. Other methods, including functional clotting-based assays and antigenic assays, are available; however, protocols for these assays will not be provided in this chapter.

UNASSIGNED: The one-stage assay (OSA) and the chromogenic assay (CSA) are 2 factor VIII (FVIII) assays used for the diagnosis and classification of hemophilia A. Discrepancies between the 2 assays exist in approximately one-third of patients with mild hemophilia A.
UNASSIGNED: The objectives of this study were to report the proportion of patients with mild or moderate hemophilia A and OSA-CSA discrepancies and to report the observed changes in treatment approach prompted by the presence of assay discrepancy. The study aimed to identify OSA:CSA ratio associated with the highest sensitivity for identification of patients in whom modification of treatment approach may be recommended.
UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective cohort study including adult (>18-year-old) patients with mild or moderate hemophilia A who were followed up at the Adult British Columbia Hemophilia Program between January 2013 and March 2019.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 75 patients with mild and 23 with moderate hemophilia A based on baseline OSA were included. Overall, 52% of study patients had OSA-CSA discrepancies, and change in treatment approach was observed in 27% of patients with OSA-CSA discrepancy. The OSA:CSA ratio of 1.8 to 3.5 demonstrated the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve and sensitivity for identification of patients in which modification of treatment approach may be recommended (AUC 0.75; sensitivity 71%).
UNASSIGNED: In our population, OSA-CSA discrepancy was observed in 52% of patients with mild or moderate hemophilia A, and the treatment approach in 27% of these patients had to be modified.

Laboratories monitor hemophilia replacement therapy by specific coagulation factor measurement before and after the infusion of human-derived or recombinant factors. Bypassing agents are now used for patients with inhibitors. Recently, modified long-acting coagulation factors have been introduced, for which discrepant results may be expected when the measurement is performed with one-stage clotting or chromogenic assays. Currently, novel drugs not based on coagulation factors are being developed and further tested in clinical studies. These drugs do require new methods, and therefore, laboratory evaluation of hemophilia will undergo dramatic changes in the near future. Accordingly, present laboratory methods for monitoring, which include one-stage clotting or chromogenic assays, used to measure either factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX), will not be sufficient. A thrombin generation test (TGT) or thromboelastometry may be used to monitor bypassing agents. For measuring modified long-acting coagulation factors, chromogenic assays will be probably more suitable than one-stage clotting assays. Novel drugs that are not based on coagulation factors, such as emicizumab, fitusiran, or concizumab, will require alternative methods.

BACKGROUND:  Emicizumab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody for hemophilia A (HA), has strong pharmacodynamic effects in several coagulation assays resulting in dosing difficulties with Factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates during bleeding emergencies.
METHODS: Single and multiple regression models were studied to estimate FVIII activity using 27 archived plasma samples from three patients with HA without inhibitor under emicizumab treatment. Explanatory variables were FVIII chromogenic assay (CSA), Ad|min1|, Ad|min2|, the number of seconds of APTT, and the FVIII one-stage assay (OSA), which were measured without idiotype antibodies. The response variable was FVIII OSA measured with idiotype antibodies.
RESULTS: In the simple linear model, the FVIII CSA regression coefficient was 1.04 and the intercept was -14.55 (r2 = 0.95; p < 0.001). In the multiple regression model, FVIII OSA and FVIII CSA were selected based on the Akaike Information Criterion, with regression coefficients of 1.74 and 1.15, respectively, and an intercept of -92.03 (r2 = 0.96, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The regression models can estimate the FVIII:C levels in patients with HA receiving emicizumab and would be useful in a bleeding emergency and/or surgery.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-inhibiting factor Xa (FXa-DOAC) are being increasingly used as prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism and for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. In contrast to vitamin K antagonists, DOACs do not require monitoring in general. However, it is sometimes of value in the acute setting, for instance when considering a reversal agent in uncontrolled bleeding in patients on DOAC.
METHODS: We evaluated if a low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH)-calibrated anti-factor Xa assay could be used to estimate FXa-DOAC concentration in the concentration range <100 ng/mL by spiking known concentrations of FXa-DOAC and from those result calculate the FXa-DOAC concentration from the response of the LMWH assay. This procedure was then evaluated by comparing the result with a drug-calibrated chromogenic assay and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) on clinical plasma samples from patients treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban.
RESULTS: Although the measuring range was narrower for the LMWH-calibrated assay, concentrations recalculated from the LMWH assay was comparable with those measured by the drug-calibrated method when compared with LC-MS/MS.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that an LMWH-calibrated anti-factor Xa assay can be used after characterization of the response of FXa-DOACs to give guidance on the concentration of apixaban and rivaroxaban. Shorter turnaround time than LC-MS/MS and the greater availability than drug-calibrated chromogenic assays could make this a valuable option in the acute setting.

OBJECTIVE: Measurement of protein S (PS) activity in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) using reagents based on a clotting assay results in falsely high PS activity, thus masking inherited PS deficiency, which is most frequently seen in the Japanese population. In this study, we investigated the effect of factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors on PS activity using the reagent on the basis of the chromogenic assay, which was recently developed in Japan.
METHODS: The study enrolled 152 patients (82 males and 70 females; the average age: 68.5±14.0 years) receiving three FXa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and apixaban). PS activity was measured using the reagents on the basis of the clotting and chromogenic assays.
RESULTS: PS activity measured by the clotting assay reagents exhibited falsely high values depending on the plasma concentrations of FXa inhibitors in patients taking either rivaroxaban or edoxaban. However, none of the three FXa inhibitors affected PS activity when measured using the chromogenic assay.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients taking rivaroxaban or edoxaban, inherited PS deficiency is likely missed because the levels of PS activity measured using the reagents based on the clotting assay are falsely high. However, we report that three FXa inhibitors do not affect PS activity measured by the chromogenic assay. When measuring the levels of PS activity in patients undergoing DOACs, the principles of each reagent should be understood. Furthermore, plasma samples must be collected at the time when plasma concentrations of DOACs are lowest or the DOAC-Stop reagent should be used.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of hemophilia A (HA) is based on the measurement of factor VIII activity (VIII:C). About one-third of non-severe HA patients show a discrepancy of VIII:C measured by one-stage (VIII:C 1st) and chromogenic (VIII:C chr) assays. Different mutations in the F8 gene may cause the discrepancy in results of the FVIII activity assay. The aim of this study was to investigate F8 gene mutations in patients with assay discrepancies and to evaluate their impact on the results of VIII:C assays.
METHODS: Mutation analysis was performed on 41 individuals with a discrepancy in VIII:C 1st and FVIII: C chr assays by direct sequencing. In addition, the effect of the variants on FVIII macromolecule structure was investigated by in silico and bioinformatics tools.
RESULTS: Genetic analysis disclosed 22 different variants, of which 19 were identified for the first time to be involved in the phenotype of VIII:C discrepancy. Most of the variants related to the higher VIII:C 1st were found in A1, A2, A3 domains. The variant related to VIII:C chr > VIII:C 1st was located in the thrombin cleavage site. In silico analysis showed the effect of variants on FVIII macromolecule stability, which may be the possible mechanism causing the discrepancy.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data shed light on the impact of genetic defects on VIII:C assay and provided evidence that the consideration of these mutations may open a new window to the proper diagnosis and treatment monitoring of non-severe HA patients.