UNASSIGNED: The one-stage assay (OSA) and the chromogenic assay (CSA) are 2 factor VIII (FVIII) assays used for the diagnosis and classification of hemophilia A. Discrepancies between the 2 assays exist in approximately one-third of patients with mild hemophilia A.
UNASSIGNED: The objectives of this study were to report the proportion of patients with mild or moderate hemophilia A and OSA-CSA discrepancies and to report the observed changes in treatment approach prompted by the presence of assay discrepancy. The study aimed to identify OSA:CSA ratio associated with the highest sensitivity for identification of patients in whom modification of treatment approach may be recommended.
UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective cohort study including adult (>18-year-old) patients with mild or moderate hemophilia A who were followed up at the Adult British Columbia Hemophilia Program between January 2013 and March 2019.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 75 patients with mild and 23 with moderate hemophilia A based on baseline OSA were included. Overall, 52% of study patients had OSA-CSA discrepancies, and change in treatment approach was observed in 27% of patients with OSA-CSA discrepancy. The OSA:CSA ratio of 1.8 to 3.5 demonstrated the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve and sensitivity for identification of patients in which modification of treatment approach may be recommended (AUC 0.75; sensitivity 71%).
UNASSIGNED: In our population, OSA-CSA discrepancy was observed in 52% of patients with mild or moderate hemophilia A, and the treatment approach in 27% of these patients had to be modified.

Laboratories monitor hemophilia replacement therapy by specific coagulation factor measurement before and after the infusion of human-derived or recombinant factors. Bypassing agents are now used for patients with inhibitors. Recently, modified long-acting coagulation factors have been introduced, for which discrepant results may be expected when the measurement is performed with one-stage clotting or chromogenic assays. Currently, novel drugs not based on coagulation factors are being developed and further tested in clinical studies. These drugs do require new methods, and therefore, laboratory evaluation of hemophilia will undergo dramatic changes in the near future. Accordingly, present laboratory methods for monitoring, which include one-stage clotting or chromogenic assays, used to measure either factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX), will not be sufficient. A thrombin generation test (TGT) or thromboelastometry may be used to monitor bypassing agents. For measuring modified long-acting coagulation factors, chromogenic assays will be probably more suitable than one-stage clotting assays. Novel drugs that are not based on coagulation factors, such as emicizumab, fitusiran, or concizumab, will require alternative methods.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-inhibiting factor Xa (FXa-DOAC) are being increasingly used as prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism and for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. In contrast to vitamin K antagonists, DOACs do not require monitoring in general. However, it is sometimes of value in the acute setting, for instance when considering a reversal agent in uncontrolled bleeding in patients on DOAC.
METHODS: We evaluated if a low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH)-calibrated anti-factor Xa assay could be used to estimate FXa-DOAC concentration in the concentration range <100 ng/mL by spiking known concentrations of FXa-DOAC and from those result calculate the FXa-DOAC concentration from the response of the LMWH assay. This procedure was then evaluated by comparing the result with a drug-calibrated chromogenic assay and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) on clinical plasma samples from patients treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban.
RESULTS: Although the measuring range was narrower for the LMWH-calibrated assay, concentrations recalculated from the LMWH assay was comparable with those measured by the drug-calibrated method when compared with LC-MS/MS.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that an LMWH-calibrated anti-factor Xa assay can be used after characterization of the response of FXa-DOACs to give guidance on the concentration of apixaban and rivaroxaban. Shorter turnaround time than LC-MS/MS and the greater availability than drug-calibrated chromogenic assays could make this a valuable option in the acute setting.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of hemophilia A (HA) is based on the measurement of factor VIII activity (VIII:C). About one-third of non-severe HA patients show a discrepancy of VIII:C measured by one-stage (VIII:C 1st) and chromogenic (VIII:C chr) assays. Different mutations in the F8 gene may cause the discrepancy in results of the FVIII activity assay. The aim of this study was to investigate F8 gene mutations in patients with assay discrepancies and to evaluate their impact on the results of VIII:C assays.
METHODS: Mutation analysis was performed on 41 individuals with a discrepancy in VIII:C 1st and FVIII: C chr assays by direct sequencing. In addition, the effect of the variants on FVIII macromolecule structure was investigated by in silico and bioinformatics tools.
RESULTS: Genetic analysis disclosed 22 different variants, of which 19 were identified for the first time to be involved in the phenotype of VIII:C discrepancy. Most of the variants related to the higher VIII:C 1st were found in A1, A2, A3 domains. The variant related to VIII:C chr > VIII:C 1st was located in the thrombin cleavage site. In silico analysis showed the effect of variants on FVIII macromolecule stability, which may be the possible mechanism causing the discrepancy.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data shed light on the impact of genetic defects on VIII:C assay and provided evidence that the consideration of these mutations may open a new window to the proper diagnosis and treatment monitoring of non-severe HA patients.

In this study, we report a chromogenic reaction between magnesium ascorbyl phosphate (MAP) and ferric chloride to generate a Brown-Red clathrate, while the Treated MAP by phosphatases forms Colorless (BRTC) product with ferric chloride. The BRTC was indicative of phosphatase activity-mediated excision of phosphorous group from MAP and utilized to screen phosphatases from bacterial cell lysates. From ten tested strains, BRTC was observed in the cell lysate of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Cerro 87. BRTC was again employed to track phosphatase activity of the resuspensions of the ammonium sulfate graded precipitations of the cell lysate. Two phosphatases, PhoN and YcdX, were identified by LC-MS/MS analysis in the protein fraction giving most obvious BRTC phenotype and validated by examination of in vitro activity of the purified proteins. KEY POINTS: • BRTC is labelling-free, naked-eye visible, and independent of any facilities. • BRTC can directly screen phosphatases from microbial cell lysates. • Using BRTC system, two phosphatases were identified in Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Cerro 87.

In this study, a partial-filling affinity capillary electrophoresis (pf-ACE) method was developed for the cross-validation of fragment hits revealed by chromogenic factor XIIa (FXIIa) assay. Chromogenic assay produces false positives, mainly due to spectrophotometric interferences and sample purity issues. pf-ACE was selected as counter-screening technology because of its separative character and the fact that the target does not have to be attached or tagged. The effects of protein plug length, applied voltage and composition of the running buffer were examined and optimized. Detection limit in terms of dissociation constant was estimated at 400 μM. The affinity evaluation was performed close to physiological conditions (pH 7.4, ionic strength 0.13 mol L-1) in a poly (ethylene oxide)-coated capillary of 75 μm internal diameter x 33 cm length with an applied voltage of 3 kV. This method uncovered chromogenic assay\'s false positives due to zinc contamination. Moreover, pf-ACE supported the evaluation of compounds absorbing at 405 nm.

Eftrenonacog-alfa is a recombinant factor IX-Fc fusion protein increasingly prescribed in hemophilia B patients. We aimed to assess its pharmacodynamics (PD) in real-life setting via FIX activity measurement and thrombin generation assay (TGA). Sixty samples from 15 severe hemophilia B treated patients were collected at different time points. FIX activity was measured using product-specific one-stage clotting assay (reference method) and two chromogenic assays (CSA) (Biophen FIX and Rox FIX). TGA was triggered with 1 pM tissue factor. Five parameters were analyzed: lag time (LT), time to peak (TTP), peak height (PH), endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), and velocity. PD models were built to characterize their relationships with FIX activity, using mixed effects models. Mean trough FIX level was estimated at 4.64 (±1.50) IU/dl with a recovery at 0.78 (±0.16) IU/dl per 1 IU/kg injected dose. FIX activity ranged between 1 and 86 IU/dl with 21.5 IU/dl median value. Biophen FIX and Rox FIX allowed reliable measurements except in samples with FIX <20 IU/dl in which values were underestimated (delta >30%). PD models revealed that velocity was the most sensitive TGA parameter to FIX activity followed by PH, ETP, TTP and finally LT. Following FIX activity peak after eftrenonacog-alfa injection, velocity decreased first, followed by PH then ETP. Both CSA failed to accurately measure FIX in severe hemophilia B patients receiving eftrenonacog-alfa throughout the measuring range. TGA could be an additional valuable tool to evaluate hemostasis balance in treated patients.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis, treatment monitoring and assessment of desmopressin effect in haemophilia A patients are performed by measurement of factor VIII activity (FVIII). The two assays commonly applied are the one-stage assay and the chromogenic assay. Especially in non-severe haemophilia A, discrepancies between these assays are common. It is still unestablished which assay corresponds best with bleeding phenotype and desmopressin effect.
OBJECTIVE: To correlate FVIII levels measured by the one-stage assay and by the chromogenic assay with bleeding phenotype and, additionally, to compare FVIII assay discrepancies before and after desmopressin administration.
METHODS: Factor VIII was measured in 130 non-severe haemophilia A patients during routine visits to the outpatient clinic and/or during desmopressin testing. FVIII was measured by both the one-stage assay and the chromogenic assay. Discrepancies between assays were defined as at least a twofold difference of FVIII or an absolute FVIII difference between measurements of ≥0.10 IU/mL. Bleeding phenotype was defined as annual number of treated bleedings (adjusted ABR).
RESULTS: Hundred and thirty non-severe haemophilia A patients were included. In 31/130 patients, assay results were discrepant. However, FVIII measurements with both assays correlated adequately with adjusted ABR. In addition, in 27/130 patients FVIII measurements at baseline and after desmopressin administration were analysed. In 13/27 patients, all measurements were either equivalent or discrepant when results were compared. In 14/27 patients, this was not the case as both equivalent measurements and discrepant measurements at different time points within one patient were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Neither the one-stage assay nor the chromogenic assay is superior in predicting bleeding phenotype. In addition, equivalent or discrepant FVIII results measured before desmopressin do not always predict FVIII assay results after desmopressin administration.

The treatment options for the haemostatic disorders, haemophilia A and haemophilia B, have progressed rapidly over the last decade. The introduction of extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) concentrates to replace these missing clotting factors highlighted discordance between one-stage activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)-based clotting factor assays and chromogenic factor assays with some products. This raised awareness of the importance of investigation of potential reagent or assay differences by pharmaceutical companies. In 2017, the FVIII mimetic, emicizumab, was approved as a prophylactic treatment for haemophilia A patients with anti-FVIII inhibitors. The mechanism of action of emicizumab causes interference with some commonly used haemostasis tests including the APTT and its associated one-stage APTT-based clotting assays. Chromogenic assays may also be affected but this is dependent on the particular constituents of the reagents. Chromogenic assays containing human factor IXa (FIXa) and factor X (FX) are sensitive to the presence of emicizumab but those containing bovine FIXa and FX are unaffected. Many haemostasis laboratories have been required to evaluate new assays to enable accurate monitoring of emicizumab in patient plasma. A number of gene therapy approaches have been trialled in both haemophilia A and haemophilia B but there are scant data published on the measurement of FVIII and FIX in these patients and whether there are discrepancies between reagents or assay methodologies.

Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) is a rare, autosomal dominant disease caused by mutations in SERPING1 gene leading to dysfunction/deficiency of C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) protein and subsequent dysregulation of the contact system and bradykinin overproduction. As functional C1-INH (fC1-INH) levels are reduced in HAE types I and II (HAE-I/II), a specific, sensitive and accessible rapid diagnostic method to quantitate fC1-INH is crucial in diagnosing HAE-I/II. Previously, we developed/validated methods to detect fC1-INH levels in human plasma based on functional binding to C1s or FXIIa for C1-INH-based therapies. Quantitative fC1-INH immunoassay methods were converted to the Lateral flow assay (LFA) platform after identifying the best reagent/s pair. The assay was developed and optimized as a first of its kind LFA method for quantifying fC1-INH in human plasma to aid HAE point-of-care diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed using normal control and HAE subject plasma samples to calculate area-under-curve and a cut-off point to distinguish normal versus HAE subject samples. LFA data was correlated with the conventional diagnostic assay for fC1-INH in HAE plasma samples and profiles matched for individual subjects. Here, we demonstrate a proof-of-concept for the quantitative fC1-INH LFA using normal and HAE plasma samples. We propose that the method could be used as a point-of-care test to diagnose HAE in a variety of settings, such as, a hospital or physician\'s office, at home or in an ambulance.