Cell Phone Use

手机使用
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:行人是道路使用者中特别脆弱的群体。步行时使用手机(MPUWW)是行人参与道路交通事故和相关伤害的重要原因。当前的研究旨在通过电话依赖(在人内水平)探索状态正念对日常MPUWW的影响,以及风险感知(在人与人之间)在电话依赖-MPUWW关系中的调节作用。
    方法:我们使用了细粒度方法,每日日记方法(DDM)探索上述模型。共有88名中国大学生参加了连续12天的学习,产生632个每日数据。使用未合并的多级建模来分析数据。
    结果:在特质正念被控制之后,状态正念通过日常的电话依赖对MPUWW产生负面影响。此外,风险感知作为个体差异变量调节电话依赖与MPUWW之间的关系,其中在风险感知水平较高的个体中观察到较弱的影响。
    结论:状态正念可以通过减少电话依赖来减少每日MPUWW的频率,风险感知是减轻电话依赖对MPUWW的负面影响的关键因素。
    结论:为了降低MPUWW,从而最大程度地减少道路交通事故和相关伤害的风险,有利于培养个人的当下意识,鼓励个人以平衡和明智的方式使用手机,并将增强风险感知纳入道路安全教育。
    BACKGROUND: Pedestrians are a particularly vulnerable group of road users. Mobile phone usage while walking (MPUWW) is a significant contributor to pedestrians\' involvement in road crashes and associated injuries. The current study aims to explore the effect of state mindfulness on daily MPUWW via phone dependence (at the within-person level), and the moderating role of risk perception (at the between-person level) in the phone dependence-MPUWW relationship.
    METHODS: We utilized a fine-grained method, the daily diary methodology (DDM) to explore the aforementioned model. A total of 88 Chinese college students participated in a consecutive 12-day study, yielding 632 daily data. Unconflated multilevel modeling was used to analyze the data.
    RESULTS: After trait mindfulness being controlled, state mindfulness has a negative impact on MPUWW via phone dependence at the daily level. Furthermore, risk perception as an individual difference variable moderates the relationship between phone dependence and MPUWW, in which a weaker effect observed in individuals with higher levels of risk perception.
    CONCLUSIONS: State mindfulness can decrease the frequency of daily MPUWW by reducing phone dependence, and risk perception is a crucial factor in mitigating the negative effects of phone dependence on MPUWW.
    CONCLUSIONS: To lower MPUWW and thereby minimize the risk of road crashes and associated injuries, it is beneficial to foster present-moment awareness of individuals, encourage individuals to use mobile phones in a balanced and sensible manner, and integrate the enhancement of risk perception into road safety education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:年轻驾驶员在开车时使用手持电话是社会上普遍关注的问题,尽管采取了阻止这种行为的对策。社会规范方法在减少年轻人的负面行为方面是有效的(例如,暴饮暴食,酒后驾车)。然而,这种方法是否可以减少该人群驾驶时手持电话的使用尚未得到彻底调查。
    方法:定性研究探索了年轻驾驶员对社会规范信息的态度和意见,旨在减少驾驶时手持电话的使用。此外,探讨了年轻司机对当前活动的看法,以进一步了解这些信息的有效性。采访了30名年轻司机,并向他们展示了6条社会规范信息。
    结果:使用反身主题分析对数据进行了分析,产生五个主题和一个子主题:(1)道路安全信息,对驾驶时手持电话使用影响最小;(2)什么是驾驶时手持电话使用的有效道路安全信息;(3)社会规范信息和道路安全信息之间的比较;(4)综合社会规范的潜在好处,(4a)改善和优化信息;(5)“它只是屏幕上的数字”:对社会规范信息的负面看法。结果强调了对道路安全运动的不同意见,以及需要增加对这些信息的接触。Further,综合社会规范信息被认为在减少驾驶时手持电话使用方面最有效。
    结论:当前的研究提供了初步证据,表明社会规范方法可能有效减少年轻驾驶员手持电话的使用。Further,这项研究强调了在这一高风险队列中,在驾驶运动时最大限度地暴露于手机的必要性.
    结论:结果支持开发一种社会规范的信息传递干预措施,以减少年轻驾驶员在驾驶时手持电话的使用。
    BACKGROUND: Engagement in hand-held phone use while driving among young drivers is a prevalent concern in society, despite countermeasures to deter the behavior. The social norm approach has been effective in reducing negative behaviors in young adults (e.g., binge drinking, drink driving). However, whether this approach can reduce hand-held phone use while driving in this population has not been thoroughly investigated.
    METHODS: The qualitative study explored young drivers\' attitudes and opinions on social norm messages designed to reduce hand-held phone use while driving. In addition, young drivers\' opinions on current campaigns were explored to provide further insight into the effectiveness of these messages. Thirty young drivers were interviewed and shown six social norm messages.
    RESULTS: The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, resulting in five themes and one sub-theme: (1) Road safety messages with minimal impact on hand-held phone use while driving; (2) What constitutes an effective road safety message for hand-held phone use while driving; (3) Comparisons between social norm messages and road safety messages; (4) The potential benefits of combined social norms, (4a) Improving and optimizing the message; and (5) \"It\'s kinda just numbers on a screen\": Negative views on social norm messages. Results highlight the diverse opinions towards road safety campaigns and the need to increase exposure to these messages. Further, a combined social norm message was perceived as most effective in reducing engagement in hand-held phone use while driving.
    CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides preliminary evidence that the social norm approach may be effective in reducing hand-held phone use among young drivers. Further, this study highlights the need to maximize exposure to phone use while driving campaigns in this high-risk cohort.
    CONCLUSIONS: Results support the development of a social norm messaging intervention to reduce young drivers hand-held phone use while driving.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    手机在日常生活中是必不可少的,尤其是在大流行期间。长时间使用会导致姿势问题,导致常见的颈部疼痛。本研究旨在确定手机使用持续时间之间的相关性,上瘾,颈部肌肉耐力,大学生的脖子疼痛。该研究包括62名参与者(30名女性,32名男性),年龄18-35岁。纳入标准要求参与者在过去一年中至少经历过两次颈部疼痛,并且没有其他伴随问题。以及自愿参加这项研究。收集人口统计信息和每日手机使用时间。用视觉模拟量表评估颈部疼痛,智能手机成瘾与智能手机成瘾量表,并对颈肌耐力进行了评价。相关分析显示颈部疼痛严重程度(NPS)与颈部伸肌耐力(CEME)之间存在中等关系,NPS与颈屈肌耐力(CFME)之间有很强的关系,以及日常电话使用时间(DPUT)之间的密切关系,CFME,和NPS,DPUT和CEME之间有适度的关系。参与者根据他们的DPUT分为两组,揭示那些使用手机四个小时或更长时间的人表现出明显更高的疼痛水平(p<0.05),并降低了颈屈肌的耐力。我们的研究发现颈部疼痛之间有很强的相关性,肌肉耐力,和日常电话使用。每天使用手机超过四个小时的参与者报告颈部疼痛增加,肌肉耐力下降。我们建议将手机使用持续时间整合到颈部疼痛评估中,促进人体工程学实践,并为用户提供详细的使用指南。
    The mobile phone is essential in daily life, especially during the pandemic. Prolonged use can cause postural issues, leading to common neck pain. This study aims to determine the correlation between mobile phone use duration, addiction, neck muscle endurance, and neck pain in university students. The study included 62 participants (30 female, 32 male) aged 18-35 years. Inclusion criteria required participants to have experienced neck pain at least twice in the past year and to have no other concomitant issues, as well as to volunteer for the study. Demographic information and daily mobile phone usage time were collected. Neck pain was assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale, smartphone addiction with the Smartphone Addiction Scale, and cervical muscle endurance was evaluated. Correlation analysis reveals a moderate relationship between neck pain severity (NPS) and cervical extensor muscle endurance (CEME), a strong relationship between NPS and cervical flexor muscle endurance (CFME), as well as a strong relationship among daily phone usage time (DPUT), CFME, and NPS, with a moderate relationship between DPUT and CEME. Participants were divided into two groups based on their DPUT, revealing that those who used their phone for four hours or more showed significantly higher levels of pain (p < 0.05) and reduced endurance in cervical flexor muscles. Our study found a strong correlation between neck pain, muscle endurance, and daily phone usage. Participants using their phones for more than four hours daily reported increased neck pain and decreased muscle endurance. We suggest integrating phone usage duration into neck pain assessments, promoting ergonomic practices, and offering detailed usage guidelines for users.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    驾驶时使用手持电话是车辆撞车的主要因素。需要采取可扩展的干预措施来鼓励驾驶员不要使用手机。
    测试涉及社会比较反馈和/或经济激励措施的干预措施是否可以减少驾驶员\'手持电话的使用。
    在一项随机临床试验中,在基于使用情况的保险计划(SnapshotMobile应用程序)的背景下,通过移动应用程序在美国全国范围内实施干预措施.如果参加基于使用的保险计划30至70天,客户有资格被邀请参加研究。该研究于2019年5月13日至6月30日进行。分析于2023年12月22日完成。
    参与者被随机分配到6个试验组中的1个,为期7周的干预期:(1)控制;(2)反馈,每周推送通知他们的手持电话使用情况,与类似的其他人相比;(3)标准激励,根据他们的手持电话与其他类似电话的使用情况,在干预结束时最高可获得50美元的奖励;(4)标准激励加上反馈,结合第二和第三武器的干预;(5)重组激励加反馈,每周最高奖励7.15美元,将参与者视为输球;(6)将重组激励加反馈加倍,最高每周14.29美元的损失框架奖励。
    从事手持电话使用的驾驶时间的比例,以每小时(s/h)驾驶秒为单位。采用意向治疗方法进行分析。
    在通过电子邮件邀请参加的17663名客户中,2109人选择并随机分组。共有2020名司机完成了干预期(68.0%为女性;平均年龄,30[IQR,25-39]年)。基线手持电话使用中位数为216(IQR,72-480)秒/小时。相对于控制,反馈和标准激励参与者并没有减少他们手持电话的使用。标准激励加反馈参与者的使用率降低了-38(95%CI,-69至-8)s/h(P=.045);重组激励加反馈参与者的使用率降低了-56(95%CI,-87至-26)s/h(P<.001);加倍重组激励加反馈参与者的使用率降低了-42s/h(95%CI,-72至-13s/h;P=.5个主动治疗组彼此之间没有显着差异。
    在这项随机临床试验中,提供社会比较反馈和奖励减少手持电话的使用,而个人驾驶。
    ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03833219。
    UNASSIGNED: Handheld phone use while driving is a major factor in vehicle crashes. Scalable interventions are needed to encourage drivers not to use their phones.
    UNASSIGNED: To test whether interventions involving social comparison feedback and/or financial incentives can reduce drivers\' handheld phone use.
    UNASSIGNED: In a randomized clinical trial, interventions were administered nationwide in the US via a mobile application in the context of a usage-based insurance program (Snapshot Mobile application). Customers were eligible to be invited to participate in the study if enrolled in the usage-based insurance program for 30 to 70 days. The study was conducted from May 13 to June 30, 2019. Analysis was completed December 22, 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 trial arms for a 7-week intervention period: (1) control; (2) feedback, with weekly push notification about their handheld phone use compared with that of similar others; (3) standard incentive, with a maximum $50 award at the end of the intervention based on how their handheld phone use compared with similar others; (4) standard incentive plus feedback, combining interventions of arms 2 and 3; (5) reframed incentive plus feedback, with a maximum $7.15 award each week, framed as participant\'s to lose; and (6) doubled reframed incentive plus feedback, a maximum $14.29 weekly loss-framed award.
    UNASSIGNED: Proportion of drive time engaged in handheld phone use in seconds per hour (s/h) of driving. Analyses were conducted with the intention-to-treat approach.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 17 663 customers invited by email to participate, 2109 opted in and were randomized. A total of 2020 drivers finished the intervention period (68.0% female; median age, 30 [IQR, 25-39] years). Median baseline handheld phone use was 216 (IQR, 72-480) s/h. Relative to control, feedback and standard incentive participants did not reduce their handheld phone use. Standard incentive plus feedback participants reduced their use by -38 (95% CI, -69 to -8) s/h (P = .045); reframed incentive plus feedback participants reduced their use by -56 (95% CI, -87 to -26) s/h (P < .001); and doubled reframed incentive plus feedback participants reduced their use by -42 s/h (95% CI, -72 to -13 s/h; P = .007). The 5 active treatment arms did not differ significantly from each other.
    UNASSIGNED: In this randomized clinical trial, providing social comparison feedback plus incentives reduced handheld phone use while individuals were driving.
    UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03833219.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估基于正念的认知疗法(MBCT)干预在减少有问题的手机使用方面的功效,抑郁症,和青少年的睡眠障碍。此外,它试图调查有问题的手机使用减少是否在MBCT干预与青少年抑郁症和睡眠障碍之间的关系中起中介作用.
    在一项随机对照试验中,共有104名青少年被随机分配到正念组(n=52)或等待组(n=52).正念小组的学生在四周内完成了八次45分钟的正念训练。结果在基线测量,干预后,在2个月的随访中。
    与对照组相比,正念组的正念水平明显更高,而有问题的手机使用水平较低,抑郁症,和干预后的睡眠障碍。干预效果在2个月的随访中保持不变。此外,有问题的手机使用减少显著介导了MBCT干预与抑郁和睡眠障碍减少之间的关联.
    研究结果表明,MBCT可以改善青少年抑郁症和睡眠障碍,减少有问题的手机使用是MBCT干预青少年抑郁症和睡眠障碍的有效途径。
    UNASSIGNED: The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) intervention in reducing problematic mobile phone use, depression, and sleep disorders among adolescents. Additionally, it sought to investigate whether the decrease in problematic mobile phone use acted as a mediator in the relationship between the MBCT intervention and adolescent depression and sleep disorders.
    UNASSIGNED: In a randomized controlled trial, a total of 104 adolescents were randomly assigned to the mindfulness group (n = 52) or the wait-list control group (n = 52). The mindfulness group students completed eight 45-min sessions of mindfulness training in four weeks. The outcomes were measured at baseline, postintervention, and at the 2-month follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared with the control group, the mindfulness group had significantly greater levels of mindfulness and lower levels of problematic mobile phone use, depression, and sleep disorders postintervention. The intervention effects were maintained at the 2-month follow-up. In addition, decreased problematic mobile phone use significantly mediated the association between the MBCT intervention and decreased depression and decreased sleep disorders.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings suggest that MBCT could improve adolescent depression and sleep disorders and that decreasing problematic mobile phone use is an effective pathway accounting for the MBCT intervention effect on adolescent depression and sleep disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是对巴拉那州西北部宏观区域的手机信号覆盖进行详细的地理空间分析,巴西,寻求确定覆盖范围的限制可能与直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)的漫长旅行时间有关的领域,以帮助道路交通伤害(RTI)的受害者。
    进行了一项观察性研究,以检查2017年至2021年的手机信号覆盖范围和HEMS旅行时间。HEMS旅行时间分为四组:T1(0-15分钟),T2(16-30分钟),T3(31-45分钟),和T4(超过45分钟)。经验贝叶斯克里格法用于绘制移动信号覆盖率低的区域。进行了Kruskal-Wallis测试和Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner比较分析,以探索移动信号覆盖如何与HEMS到RTI位置的旅行时间相关。
    HEMS参加了470次RTI,其中108人(23%)导致现场死亡。在这些死亡中,47(26.85%)发生在手机信号覆盖率较低的地区(“阴影区域”)。在175个(37.24%)RTI位置确定的低手机信号覆盖范围,在宏观区域分布不均。移动信号质量的最低中位数主要在HEMS行进时间超过30分钟的区域中发现。对应于-98.44(T3)和-100.75(T4)dBm的信号强度值。这种情况代表了激活HEMS的有效通信的挑战。在旅行时间组间的多重比较分析中,T1和T2之间存在显着差异(p<0.001),T1和T3(p<0.001),T1和T4(p<0.001),T2和T3(p<0.001),指示较低的移动电话信号覆盖与较长的HEMS行进时间之间的潜在关联。
    可以得出结论,偏远地区不良的手机信号会阻碍HEMS的激活,可能会延迟RTIs的治疗开始。识别阴影区域可以帮助通信和健康管理人员设计和实施必要的更改,以改善手机信号覆盖范围,从而减少对RTI的初始响应的延迟。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to conduct a detailed geospatial analysis of mobile phone signal coverage in the northwest macro-region of Paraná State, Brazil, seeking to identify areas where limitations in coverage may be related to lengthy travel times of the helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) for the assistance of victims of road traffic injuries (RTIs).
    UNASSIGNED: An observational study was conducted to examine mobile phone signal coverage and HEMS travel times from 2017 to 2021. HEMS travel times were categorized into four groups: T1 (0-15 min), T2 (16-30 min), T3 (31-45 min), and T4 (over 45 min). Empirical Bayesian Kriging was used to map areas with low mobile signal coverage. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner comparative analyses were performed to explore how mobile signal coverage relates to HEMS travel times to RTI locations.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 470 occurrences of RTIs attended by HEMS, of which 108 (23%) resulted in on-site fatalities. Among these deaths, 47 (26.85%) occurred in areas with low mobile phone signal coverage (\"shadow areas\"). Low mobile phone signal coverage identified at 175 (37.24%) RTIs locations, was unevenly distributed across the macro-region. The lowest medians of mobile signal quality were predominantly found in areas with HEMS travel times exceeding 30 min, corresponding to signal strength values of -98.44 (T3) and -100.75 (T4) dBm. This scenario represents a challenge for effective communication to activate HEMS. In the multiple comparison analysis among travel time groups, significant differences were observed between T1 and T2 (p < 0.001), T1 and T3 (p < 0.001), T1 and T4 (p < 0.001), and T2 and T3 (p < 0.001), indicating a potential association between lower mobile phone signal coverage and longer HEMS travel times.
    UNASSIGNED: It can be concluded that poor mobile phone signals in remote areas can hinder HEMS activation, potentially delaying the start of treatment for RTIs. Identification of the shadow areas can help communication and health managers in designing and implementing the necessary changes to improve mobile phone signal coverage and consequently reduce delays in the initial response to RTIs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    分心驾驶是机动车撞车的主要原因,使用手机是车内分心的主要来源。美国许多州都颁布了手机使用法律来规范司机的手机使用行为,以提高交通安全。许多研究基于自我报告和路边观察数据,研究了此类法律对驾驶员手机使用行为的影响。然而,在执法层面,人们对谁实际上违反了法律知之甚少。这项研究旨在揭示驾驶时使用手机的驾驶员的人口统计学特征,以及自手机法律颁布以来,这些特征是否随时间而变化。
    我们获得了2010年至2020年美国7个州的可用交通引文数据,并进行了描述性和回归分析。
    男性司机被引用更多的是在开车时使用手机。手持和短信禁令与40岁及以上被引用司机的比例更高相关,与仅发短信的禁令相比。还发现了在制定不同的手机法律后,根据驾驶员年龄段发布的引文趋势。发布给60岁及以上驾驶员的引用比例随着时间的推移而增加,但是当考虑到人口效应时,时间趋势仍然微不足道。
    这项研究检查了在特定状态下使用仅发短信禁令或手持和发短信禁令驾驶时使用手机的驾驶员的人口统计学特征。结果揭示了基于政策的不同年龄段驾驶员引用比例趋势的差异。
    UNASSIGNED: Distracted driving is a leading cause of motor vehicle crashes, and cell phone use is a major source of in-vehicle distraction. Many states in the United States have enacted cell phone use laws to regulate drivers\' cell phone use behavior to enhance traffic safety. Numerous studies have examined the effects of such laws on drivers\' cell phone use behavior based on self-reported and roadside observational data. However, little was known about who actually violated the laws at the enforcement level. This study sought to uncover the demographic characteristics of drivers cited for cell phone use while driving and whether these characteristics changed over time since the enactment of cell phone laws.
    UNASSIGNED: We acquired useable traffic citation data for 7 states in the United States from 2010 to 2020 and performed descriptive and regression analyses.
    UNASSIGNED: Male drivers were cited more for cell phone use while driving. Handheld and texting bans were associated with a greater proportion of cited drivers aged 40 and above, compared to texting-only bans. Trends in the citations issued based on drivers\' age group following the enactment of different cell phone laws were also uncovered. The proportion of citations issued to drivers aged 60 and above increased over time but the temporal trend remained insignificant when population effect was considered.
    UNASSIGNED: This study examined the demographic characteristics of drivers cited for cell phone use while driving in selected states with texting-only bans or handheld and texting bans. The results reveal policy-based differences in trends in the proportion of citations issued to drivers in different age groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:手持手机使用引起的驾驶员分心每年都会导致致命的撞车事故,但由于任何分心或手机使用而导致的撞车比例却被低估了。估计手机分心患病率的现有方法也受到限制(例如,观察在十字路口停下来的司机,当崩溃风险较低时)。我们的研究使用来自剑桥移动远程信息处理的数据来估计驾驶时手持通话和手机操纵的患病率,“手机运动”基于手机记录的运动\'陀螺仪用作操纵的替代品。
    方法:我们将远程信息处理措施与美国国家公路交通安全管理局对驾驶员电子设备使用的路边观察进行了比较,和逻辑回归检验了区域之间的关系,立法,和时间因素以及手机行为发生在旅行中或给定时间点的几率。
    结果:结果显示,3.5%的旅行包括至少一个手持电话,33.3%的旅行包括至少一个手机动作,手持通话发生在总行程持续时间的0.78%期间,手机移动发生在行程持续时间的2.4%期间。
    结论:各地区手机分心趋势之间的对应关系,立法,和时间因素表明,远程信息处理数据具有相当大的实用性,并且似乎可以补充现有的数据集。
    BACKGROUND: Driver distraction from handheld cellphone use contributes to fatal crashes every year but is underreported in terms of the proportion of crashes attributed to any distraction or cellphone use specifically. Existing methods to estimate the prevalence of cellphone distractions are also limited (e.g., observing drivers stopped at intersections, when crash risk is low). Our study used data from Cambridge Mobile Telematics to estimate the prevalence of drivers\' handheld calls and cellphone manipulation while driving, with \"cellphone motion\" based on movement recorded by the phones\' gyroscopes used as a surrogate for manipulation.
    METHODS: We compared the telematics measures with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration\'s roadside observations of driver electronic device use, and logistic regression tested relationships between regional, legislative, and temporal factors and the odds of cellphone behaviors occurring on a trip or at a given point in time.
    RESULTS: Results showed 3.5% of trips included at least one handheld phone call and 33.3% included at least an instance of cellphone motion, with handheld calls occurring during 0.78% of overall trip duration and cellphone motion during 2.4% of trip duration.
    CONCLUSIONS: Correspondence between trends in cellphone distractions across regional, legislative, and temporal factors suggest telematics data have considerable utility and appear to complement existing datasets.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了调查年轻人有问题的手机使用率(PMPU)和时间型,并检查PMPU与时间型的关联,以及它的性别差异。此外,我们探讨了PER3基因DNA甲基化在关联中的调节作用。
    2019年4月至5月,从安徽和江西两省的2所大学共选拔了1179名青壮年。采用青少年问题手机使用自我评估问卷(SQAPMPU)和简化的晨显-均匀性问卷(rMEQ)来调查年轻人的PMPU和时间类型,分别。此外,收集744份血样测定PER3基因DNA甲基化。建立多因素logistic回归模型分析PMPU与表型的相关性。调节分析用于确定PER3基因DNA甲基化是否调节了PMPU和时间型之间的关系。
    PMPU的患病率,早晨型(M型),中性型(N型),年轻人的晚间型(E型)为24.6%,18.4%,71.1%,和10.5%,分别。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,PMPU与E型呈正相关(OR=3.53,95CI:2.08~6.00),仅在按性别分层后的女性中观察到这种关联(OR=5.36,95CI:2.70-10.67)。此外,PER3基因DNA甲基化在PMPU和时间型之间具有负调节作用,并且具有基于性别的差异。
    本研究可从流行病学和生物学病因学的角度为青年昼夜节律紊乱的预防和控制提供有价值的信息。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the rates of problematic mobile phone use (PMPU) and chronotypes in young adults, and examine the associations of PMPU with chronotypes, as well as its gender differences. Furthermore, we explored the moderating role of PER3 gene DNA methylation on the associations.
    UNASSIGNED: From April to May 2019, a total of 1,179 young adults were selected from 2 universities in Anhui and Jiangxi provinces. The Self-rating Questionnaire for Adolescent Problematic Mobile Phone Use (SQAPMPU) and reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ) were adopted to investigate PMPU and chronotypes in young adults, respectively. Moreover, 744 blood samples were collected to measure PER3 gene DNA methylation. Multivariate logistic regression models were established to analyze the associations between PMPU and chronotypes. Moderating analysis was used to determine whether PER3 gene DNA methylation moderated the relationships between PMPU and chronotypes.
    UNASSIGNED: The prevalence of PMPU, morning chronotypes (M-types), neutral chronotypes (N-types), and evening chronotypes (E-types) of young adults were 24.6%, 18.4%, 71.1%, and 10.5%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression results indicated that PMPU was positively correlated with E-types (OR = 3.53, 95%CI: 2.08-6.00), and the association was observed only in females after stratified by gender (OR = 5.36, 95%CI: 2.70-10.67). Furthermore, PER3 gene DNA methylation has a negative moderating role between PMPU and chronotypes and has a sex-based difference.
    UNASSIGNED: This study can provide valuable information for the prevention and control of circadian rhythm disturbance among young adults from the perspective of epidemiology and biological etiology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号