Carers

照顾者
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    进食障碍(ED)通常涉及入院和高复发率,对病人和他们的家人来说,回家是一个关键时刻。他们回家后,他们经常难以将学到的指导方针融入日常环境。ECHOMANTRA干预计划旨在通过提供涉及患者及其家人和护理人员的心理策略来促进这种转变。具体来说,ECHO计划针对这些患者的亲属。本研究旨在分析通过基于个人干预和在线格式的新颖格式将ECHO计划添加到亲属的常规治疗(TAU)中的功效,并研究这种新格式的可接受性和可行性。研究设计是多中心,随机化,控制,纵向设计和比较两个平行组。共有108名家庭成员参加。结果表明,两组的亲属,TAU和ECHO+TAU,表现出表达情感的改善,住宿,ED的影响,情感幸福,和照顾者的技能。然而,ECHO+TAU组的效应大小略大于TAU组。此外,添加ECHO成分后,抑郁和护理技能的变化更大.大多数护理人员(81.48%)完成了ECHO,并表示对该计划的满意度很高。这些结果表明了以个人在线形式将ECHO干预计划添加到常规治疗中的有效性和可行性。
    Eating disorders (ED) usually involve hospital admission and a high relapse rate, with the return home being a critical moment for patients and their families. After their return home, they often have trouble incorporating the guidelines they have learned into their daily context. ECHOMANTRA intervention program aims to facilitate this transition by offering psychological strategies that involve both patients and their families and carers. Specifically, the ECHO program is aimed at the relatives of these patients. The present study aimed to analyze the efficacy of adding the ECHO program to the usual treatment (TAU) of relatives through a novel format based on individual intervention and with an online format and to examine the acceptability and feasibility of this new format. The study design was multi-center, randomized, controlled, with a longitudinal design and comparing two parallel groups. A total of 108 family members participated. Results indicated that relatives from both groups, TAU and ECHO + TAU, showed improvements in expressed emotion, accommodation, impact of the ED, emotional well-being, and caregiver skills. However, effect sizes in the ECHO + TAU group were slightly larger than the TAU group. In addition, the changes were greater in depression and caregiver skills when the ECHO component was added. Most caregivers (81.48%) completed the ECHO and indicated a high level of satisfaction with the program. These results suggest the efficacy and the feasibility of adding the ECHO intervention program to the usual treatment in an individual online format.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着患者和公众参与研究(PPI)变得越来越普遍,关于其原则和影响的基于研究的建议已经建立。当涉及不同的群体时,进行PPI的细节可能会有所不同。有健康状况或残疾的家庭/非正式照顾者可以为研究做出很多贡献,但是他们参与的例子还有待审查。
    目的:系统回顾和综合家庭/非正式照顾者参与研究过程的研究,为了了解好处,障碍和促进因素。
    方法:使用与照顾者相关的术语组合对五个电子数据库进行搜索,参与和研究。灰色文献搜索,还使用了专家咨询和手工搜索。筛选后,数据提取和质量评估,进行了结合主题分析的叙事综合。
    结果:共有55项研究符合纳入标准,具有多样化的设计和参与式方法。确定了四个主题,关于结果,挑战,涉及照顾者的实用性:(重新)与照顾者建立关系;照顾者平等而不是事后的想法;照顾者有独特的经历;照顾者创造变化。在整个研究中充分参与并不总是可能的,由于来自研究界的障碍和关怀角色的责任。文献展示了照顾者以适合他们的方式做出贡献的方式,最大化他们的影响,同时关注关系和权力失衡。
    结论:通过总结护理者参与研究的报告实例,这篇评论汇集了不同的例子,说明如何与照顾者建立成功的研究伙伴关系,尽管面临各种挑战。照顾者是一个异质的群体,参与式方法应适合具体情况。更广泛地了解与照顾者进行授权研究的挑战,以及解决这些问题所需的资源,是需要的。
    最初的发现和主题已提交给参与研究的一组护理人员,他们的思考为最终的综合提供了信息。
    BACKGROUND: As patient and public involvement (PPI) in research has become increasingly common, research-based recommendations on its principles and impacts have been established. The specifics of conducting PPI are likely to differ when involving different groups. Family/informal carers for those with health conditions or disabilities have a lot to contribute to research, but instances of their involvement have yet to be reviewed.
    OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and synthesize studies where family/informal carers have been involved in the research process, to develop an understanding of the benefits, barriers and facilitating factors.
    METHODS: A search of five electronic databases was conducted using a combination of terms relating to carers, involvement and research. A grey literature search, expert consultation and hand-searching were also used. Following screening, data extraction and quality assessment, a narrative synthesis incorporating thematic analysis was conducted.
    RESULTS: A total of 55 studies met the inclusion criteria, with diverse design and participatory approaches. Four themes were identified, relating to the outcomes, challenges, and practicalities of involving carers: (re) building relationships with carers; carers as equals not afterthoughts; carers have unique experiences; carers create change. Full involvement throughout the research was not always possible, due to barriers from the research world and responsibilities of the caring role. The literature demonstrated ways for carers to contribute in ways that suited them, maximizing their impact, while attending to relationships and power imbalances.
    CONCLUSIONS: By summarizing the reported instances of carer involvement in research, this review brings together different examples of how successful research partnerships can be built with carers, despite various challenges. Carers are a heterogeneous group, and participatory approaches should be tailored to specific situations. Wider understanding of the challenges of conducting empowering research with carers, and the resources required to address these, are needed.
    UNASSIGNED: The initial findings and themes were presented to a group of carers who had been involved in research and whose reflections informed the final synthesis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探讨车轮上餐(MoWs)服务用户(SU)的感知,以及将它们推荐给MoWs的人(“推荐人”),随着在英国访问和开始这项服务,可能阻碍服务吸收的障碍,以及在考虑访问该服务时将重视哪些信息。
    方法:2022年5月至7月进行了半结构化访谈,对7名SU和21名推荐人进行了访谈,从英格兰的四个MoW供应商招募。采用归纳专题分析法对数据进行分析。
    结果:参与者指出了进入服务的各种途径,但是推荐人(家庭成员)更有可能是询问的人,并开始,SUs的MoW。一旦对MoW进行了询问,该服务被认为是简单的设置。然而,现有的成见和刻板印象被认为是进入MoW的障碍。参与者在决定是否访问与膳食相关的MoW时认为重要的信息,提供的具体服务,交付的可靠性和灵活性以及服务成本。
    结论:这些发现可以为MoW服务提供商提供有关MoW的公众意识策略,为有护理和支持需求的成年人提供服务。
    拥有MoWs(服务的用户及其家庭推荐人)生活经验的咨询小组广泛讨论了研究结果,并就其含义和未来的传播步骤提供了建议。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the perceptions of Meals on Wheels (MoWs) service users (SUs), and people who refer them to MoWs (\'referrers\'), with accessing and commencing the service in England, the barriers that might hinder service uptake, and what information would be valued when considering accessing the service.
    METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted in May-July 2022 with seven SUs and 21 referrers, recruited from four MoWs providers across England. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: Participants indicated various pathways into the service, but referrers (family members) were more likely to be the ones enquiring about, and commencing, MoWs for SUs. Once an enquiry about MoWs had been made, the service was perceived as straightforward to set up. However, existing preconceptions and stereotypes were perceived to act as barriers to accessing MoWs. Information that participants deemed important to have available when deciding on whether to access MoWs related to the meals, the specific services provided, the reliability and flexibility of delivery and the cost of services.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings could inform MoWs service providers\' public awareness strategies about MoWs, to facilitate referrals to the service for adults with care and support needs.
    UNASSIGNED: An advisory group of people with lived experience of MoWs (users of the service and their family referrers) extensively discussed the findings of the research and advised on the implications and future dissemination steps.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抗胆碱能药物在痴呆患者(PLWD)中的应用令人担忧。这些药物可能会增加认知能力下降,并可能与服用这些药物的PLWD的死亡率更高有关。这项研究的目的是分析在线痴呆症讨论论坛的数据,以探索PLWD和护理人员在该人群中使用抗胆碱能药物的经验和观点。
    方法:收到伦理批准后,来自痴呆症谈话点的存档讨论(帖子),一个面向任何受痴呆症影响的人的完全公开的在线论坛,由阿尔茨海默氏症协会创建和维护,从开始之日起至2022年1月,使用一系列搜索词进行搜索,包括常用的抗胆碱能药物。帖子,包括任何搜索词,进行相关性评估,并使用归纳专题分析进行分析。
    结果:分析了550个独特的帖子,所有这些都是由看护人提供的,没有归因于PLWD的职位。涵盖护理人员经验的主题是(1)处方的动机,(2)对处方过程的看法;(3)处方结果。处方的主要动机是非认知症状的管理,痴呆症的诊断前后。护理者对处方过程的看法是通过评估开始用药的风险收益以及护理者和医疗保健专业人员之间或多或少的共享决策来了解的。处方的结果是观察药物的效果,这反过来影响了处方是否被审查并继续保持不变,继续但修改,如果药物先前已停用或停用(取消处方的过程),则重新开始。
    结论:这项研究为护理人员在PLWD中使用抗胆碱能药物的经验和观点提供了独特的见解,强调PLWD和看护者对使用这些药物的普遍程度。护理人员和PLWD显然需要获得有关这些药物的信息,医疗保健专业人员需要考虑如何优化这些药物的使用以避免副作用。
    这项工作是基于先前研究的结果,这些研究的重点是优化初级保健中痴呆症患者的药物使用。采访是与PLWD进行的,他们的照顾者和初级保健专业人员。虽然没有严格的耐心和公众参与,我们利用主要利益相关者提供的反馈来告知研究问题和本研究的目的/目标。
    BACKGROUND: There is concern about the use of anticholinergic medications in people living with dementia (PLWD). Such medicines may increase cognitive decline and may be associated with higher mortality in PLWD who take these medicines. The aim of this study was to analyse data from an online dementia discussion forum to explore the experiences and perspectives of PLWD and carers about the use of anticholinergic medicines in this population.
    METHODS: Following receipt of ethical approval, archived discussions (posts) from Dementia Talking Point, a fully public online forum for anyone affected by dementia, created and maintained by the Alzheimer\'s Society, were searched from the date of inception to January 2022 using a range of search terms including commonly used anticholinergic medicines. Posts, including any of the search terms, were assessed for relevance and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: Five hundred and fifty unique posts were analysed, all of which had been provided by carers, with no posts attributed to PLWD. The themes that encompassed carers\' experiences were (1) motivators of prescribing, (2) perspectives on the process of prescribing and (3) the outcomes of prescribing. The dominant motivator of prescribing was the management of noncognitive symptoms, pre- and postdiagnosis of dementia. Carers\' perspectives on the process of prescribing were informed by an assessment of the risk-benefit of starting a medication and shared decision-making between the carer and healthcare professional to a greater or lesser degree. The outcomes of prescribing were observing the effects of the medicines, which in turn influenced whether prescribing was reviewed and continued unchanged, continued but amended, reinitiated if the medicine had been previously stopped or discontinued (the process of deprescribing).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study has provided unique insights into carers\' experiences and perspectives about the use of anticholinergic medications in PLWD, highlighting how commonly these medications are prescribed for PLWD and carers\' concerns about their use. There is a clear need for carers and PLWD to receive information about these medicines and healthcare professionals to consider how to optimise the use of these medicines to avoid adverse effects.
    UNASSIGNED: This work was informed by findings from previous research studies focusing on optimising medicine use for people with dementia in primary care, in which interviews were conducted with PLWD, their carers and primary healthcare professionals. Although not strictly patient and public involvement, we utilised the feedback provided by key stakeholders to inform the research questions and aim/objectives of this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用数字资源“越南癌症护理应对”(V-CCC)对健康素养进行评估,抑郁症,以及在越南肿瘤医院支持癌症患者的护理人员的生活质量。
    对越南各地区肿瘤医院的成人癌症护理人员进行的事后定量评估(胡志明市,岘港,CanTho,和色调)。参与者完成了健康素养(HLS-SF12)抑郁症(PHQ-9)和健康相关生活质量(5Q-5D-5L)的基线和随访测量。参与者访问并审查了V-CCC2周。
    两百三十四名护理人员完成了前后测试。大多数参与者是女性(n=143,61%),已婚(n=165,70%),18-44岁(n=155,66%),生活在农村(n=157,67%)。在所有领域的医疗保健中,干预后参与者的所有健康素养得分均显着高于干预前,疾病预防,和健康促进以及总分(p<0.001)。干预后报告PHQ-9中度重度/重度抑郁症的护理人员比例显着降低(10.2vs.6.1%,分别(p≤0.001)。在四个5Q-5D-5L健康维度上,干预前后没有观察到显著差异:移动性,自我照顾,平时的活动,和疼痛/不适。关于5Q-5D-5L测量的焦虑/抑郁,严重,干预前后的极端问题具有统计学意义(32vs.24%),分别(p=0.0028)。
    共同设计的数字资源可以减少健康素养不平等并改善癌症护理人员的心理结果。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate a co-designed intervention using digital resources \"Vietnam Cancer Caring Coping\" (V-CCC) on the health literacy, depression, and quality of life of caregivers supporting a cancer patient in oncology hospitals in Vietnam.
    UNASSIGNED: A pre-post quantitative evaluation with adult cancer caregivers across regional Oncology hospitals in Vietnam (Ho Chi Minh City, Da Nang, Can Tho, and Hue). Participants completed baseline and follow-up measures of health literacy (HLS-SF12) depression (PHQ-9) and Health-related Quality of Life (5Q-5D-5L). Participants accessed and reviewed V-CCC for a 2-week period.
    UNASSIGNED: Two hundred and thirty-four caregivers completed pre and post-tests. Most participants were female (n = 143, 61%), married (n = 165, 70%), aged 18-44 (n = 155, 66%), lived rurally (n = 157, 67%). All health literacy scores of participants in post-intervention were significantly higher than that in pre-intervention across all domain\'s healthcare, disease prevention, and health promotion as well as the total score (p < 0.001). A significant reduction in the proportion of caregivers reporting PHQ-9 moderately severe/severe depression post-intervention was demonstrated (10.2 vs. 6.1%, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). No significant differences were observed pre and post-intervention across four 5Q-5D-5L health dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, and pain/discomfort. Regarding anxiety/depression as measured by 5Q-5D-5L the proportion of participants who reported having moderate, severe, and extreme problems in pre- and post-intervention was statistically significant (32 vs. 24%), respectively (p = 0.0028).
    UNASSIGNED: Co-designed digital resources can reduce health literacy inequities and improve psychological outcomes for cancer caregivers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:家庭和照顾者在支持经历饮食失调的亲人方面至关重要。这个角色会带来巨大的痛苦和负担,然而,照顾患有持久饮食失调的人的经历很少有研究重点。因此,这项研究的目的是让照顾者发声,赋予他们的故事以提高认识和理解,这可以为护理人员提供支持,从而为有饮食失调的生活和/或生活经历的人提供支持。
    方法:对9名护理人员进行了半结构化访谈,这些护理人员支持已经经历了7年或更长时间的饮食失调的个体。使用叙述式调查方法收集和分析数据。
    结果:照顾者的叙述揭示了负罪感和个人失败感;对当前治疗方法的深刻幻灭感;以及巨大的悲伤和痛苦。当他们谈判一个脆弱的关系与希望和他们所爱的人的未来的不确定性,照顾者谈到了复杂的无数接受感,放手,和锻造。
    结论:照顾者应该在经常沉默的地方听到他们的声音。他们的叙述紧急呼吁我们对饮食失调的治疗方法进行变革,并使护理人员进一步参与治疗过程,他们的生活经验观点有很大的潜力来指导这一努力。
    方法:V级,定性访谈。
    BACKGROUND: Families and carers are pivotal in supporting loved ones experiencing eating disorders. This role can bring immense distress and burden, yet the experience of caring for someone with an enduring eating disorder has had minimal research focus. Thus, the purpose of this study is to give voice to carers empowering their stories to increase awareness and understanding, which could inform support to carers and consequently people with a lived and/or living experience of eating disorders.
    METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 9 carers supporting individuals who had been experiencing an eating disorder for 7 or more years. Data were collected and analysed using narrative inquiry approach.
    RESULTS: Carers\' narratives revealed feelings of guilt and personal failure; a profound sense of disillusion with current treatment approaches; and immense grief and anguish. As they negotiated a tenuous relationship with hope and the uncertainty of their loved one\'s future, carers spoke to a complex myriad of feelings of acceptance, letting go, and forging on.
    CONCLUSIONS: Carers deserve to have their voices heard where they are too often silenced. Their narratives provide an urgent call for transformation in our treatments for eating disorders and further involvement of carers within the treatment journey, and their lived experience perspectives have great potential to guide this endeavour.
    METHODS: Level V, qualitative interviews.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    采用了综合审查方法,遵循PRISMA指南以及Whittemore和Knafi的综合审查方法。因此,这篇评论综合了2005年至2023年之间发表的来自四个数据库的实证文献的发现:CINAHL,MEDLINE,PsycINFO和Scopus。从符合纳入标准的七项研究中,出现了许多主题:(a)减轻照顾者的负担;(b)患有精神疾病(MI)的个人的福利;(c)获得临时护理的障碍;(d)为MI患者提供临时护理的不适当服务模式。审查结果表明,使用喘息护理服务可以减轻护理人员的负担,并对护理人员和MI患者产生积极影响。相反,由于缺乏服务可用性,喘息护理可能会导致护理人员的压力水平增加,对护理人员的喘息护理服务的认识和理解不足,MI患者可获得的喘息可及性挑战以及MI患者不愿接受喘息护理。
    An integrative review methodology was employed, following PRISMA guidelines and Whittemore and Knafi\'s method for integrative review. Thus, the review synthesised the findings of empirical literature published between 2005 and 2023 drawn from four databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Scopus. From the seven studies that met the inclusion criteria, a number of themes emerged: (a) relief of carer burden; (b) benefits for individuals with Mental Illness (MI); (c) barriers to accessing respite care; and (d) inappropriate services model for respite care for individuals with MI. The review findings indicate that using respite care services can decrease a carer\'s burden and can positively impact both carers and individuals with MI. Conversely, respite care may cause an increase in carers\' stress levels due to the lack of service availability, insufficient knowledge and understanding about respite care services for carers, respite accessibility challenges accessible for people with MI and the reluctance of people with MI to accept respite care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暴力,虐待,老年人对其护理人员实施的有害行为代表了护理领域内令人痛苦和经常被忽视的方面。这项定性研究旨在(A)探索家庭照顾者的暴力经历,虐待,以及老年人的有害行为,以及(b)探索暴力,虐待,老年人的有害行为会影响家庭照顾者的心理健康。这项定性研究包括393名参与者,年龄范围从40到72岁不等。所有的访谈都经历了内容分析的过程。对于第一个目标,调查结果表明了六个新出现的主题:频繁和极端的言语暴力(77.3%);感觉被老年人操纵和控制(74.7%);经历老年人挑起的不可预测的非法情况(62.1%);经历老年人挑起的破坏性财务问题(43.1%);经历身体暴力(34.2.%);并经历性暴力(31.1%)。第二个目标强调了四个主题:抑郁和焦虑(89.9%),愤怒(81.2%),感到道德孤立(78.3%),和情绪爆发(65.1%)。巴西参与者主要经历频繁和极端的言语暴力(62.4%)。此外,抑郁和焦虑主要由英语参与者(84.3%)言语表达。这些发现强调了老年人暴力的重大损失,虐待,有害行为会对家庭照顾者的心理健康产生影响。这项研究揭示了家庭护理人员面临的复杂经历,并强调迫切需要有针对性的干预措施,以培养更健康的护理环境。年长的人\'暴力,虐待,在研究和公共话语中,对其照顾者的有害行为受到的关注有限。这项研究的结果提醒人们注意解决这个问题的迫切需要,鉴于其对家庭照顾者的心理健康的不利影响。认识到这一主题的重要性,需要采取全面和有针对性的方法,以确保护理人员和老年人的福祉和安全。
    Violent, abusive, and harmful behavior enacted by older adults upon their caregivers represents a distressing and frequently disregarded facet within the domain of caregiving. This qualitative study aims to (a) explore family caregivers\' experiences of violent, abusive, and harmful behavior by the older person and (b) explore how violent, abusive, and harmful behavior by the older person affects family caregivers\' mental health. This qualitative study encompassed 393 participants, with a diverse age range spanning from 40 to 72 years. All the interviews went through the process of content analysis. For the first objective, findings indicated six emerging themes: Frequent and extreme verbal violence (77.3%); feeling manipulated and controlled by older adults (74.7%); experiencing unpredictable illegal circumstances provoked by older adults (62.1%); experiencing damaging financial issues provoked by older adults (43.1%); experiencing physical violence (34.2.%); and experiencing sexual violence (31.1%). The second objective highlighted four themes: depression and anxiety (89.9 %), anger (81.2%), feeling morally isolated (78.3%), and emotional outbursts (65.1%). Brazilian participants mainly experienced frequent and extreme verbal violence (62.4%). Moreover, depression and anxiety were mainly verbalized by English participants (84.3%). These findings underscore the significant toll that older individuals\' violent, abusive, and harmful behavior can have on the mental well-being of family caregivers. This study sheds light on the complex experiences faced by family caregivers and emphasizes the urgent need for targeted interventions to foster healthier caregiving environments. Older individuals\' violent, abusive, and harmful behavior toward their caregivers has received limited attention in research and public discourse. The findings of this study call attention to the pressing need of addressing this issue, given its detrimental impact on the mental health of family carers. Recognizing the significance of this topic demands a comprehensive and targeted approach to ensure the well-being and safety of caregivers and older adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19大流行显着影响了患有智力和发育障碍(IDD)的成年人的心理健康。在这个不确定和需要最新信息的时期,各种虚拟培训方案展示了远程指导方案的作用。
    目的:本文的目的是描述国家社区医疗成果扩展的教育评估-智力和发育障碍成人(ECHO-AIDD),一项针对服务提供者在COVID-19期间与成人缺碘症合作的计划。
    方法:该计划包括六个课程,每周进行,两个周期。每节课都包括中心团队成员的说教教学,COVID-19新闻更新,健康检查和简短的正念活动,接下来是30到45分钟的案例讨论。中心结构采用了跨专业的团队专业知识方法。那些有生活经验的人是内容专家中心不可或缺的一部分。Pre-,收集术后和随访评估数据.
    结果:来自卫生和社会护理部门的护理提供者(n=230)参加了该计划。报告了高水平的参与度和满意度。自我效能感评分从前到后有所改善,并且在8周的随访中保持不变;从前到后的改善是显着的(P<0.0001)。
    结论:暴露于国家ECHO-AIDD教育干预导致感知能力的改善。这项研究还显示了具有生活经验的人在培养学习者的适应性专业知识方面的宝贵作用。扩展和可扩展性支持为IDD服务提供商建立全国虚拟实践社区的可行性。未来的研究应侧重于研究这些计划对IDD患者健康结果的影响。
    BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the mental health of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). During this period of uncertainty and need for up-to-date information, various virtual training programmes demonstrated the role of tele-mentoring programmes.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to describe the educational evaluation of the National Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes - Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (ECHO-AIDD), a programme for service providers working with adults with IDD during COVID-19.
    METHODS: The programme consisted of six sessions, conducted weekly, over two cycles. Each session included didactic teaching by hub team members, COVID-19 news updates, wellness check-ins and a brief mindfulness activity, followed by a 30 to 45 min case-based discussion. The hub structure had an inter-professional approach to team expertise. Those with lived experience were an integral part of the content experts\' hub. Pre-, post- and follow-up evaluation data were collected.
    RESULTS: Care providers from health and social care sectors (n = 230) participated in the programme. High levels of engagement and satisfaction were reported. Self-efficacy ratings improved from pre- to post-, and were maintained at 8-week follow-up; improvement from pre- to post- was significant (P < 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to National ECHO-AIDD educational intervention led to improvement in perceived competencies. This study also shows the valuable role of people with lived experience in fostering adaptive expertise in learners. The outreach and scalability support the feasibility of building a national virtual community of practice for IDD service providers. Future studies should focus on studying the impact of these programmes on the health outcomes of people with IDD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    除了典型的育儿挑战,针对特定条件的初步研究表明,不同的经验和支持需求。具有不同可见差异的儿童的父母可能会经历类似的心理社会困难。尽管如此,缺乏大规模的跨条件研究来确定父母痛苦和心理社会适应的风险和保护因素。有一系列明显差异的儿童家长和照顾者完成了一项由标准化结果指标组成的在线调查,研究具体措施,和开放式问题。多元回归模型确定了可能的风险和保护因素,通过开放式问题收集的数据使用内容分析进行分析。研究结果支持先前在小规模的跨条件定性研究中与有明显差异的儿童的父母确定的主题。父母负面影响和压力的风险因素包括父母报告其孩子的明显差异和戏弄。保护因素包括良好的亲子沟通,自我同情,了解孩子的病情和对治疗的满意度。确定的风险和保护因素为该父母群体的经历提供了重要的见解,并指出了心理社会干预的可能途径。
    Alongside typical parenting challenges, initial condition-specific research suggests thadifferent experiences and support needs.t parents of children with different visible differences may experience similar psychosocial difficulties. Despite this, large-scale cross-condition research to identify risk and protective factors for parental distress and psychosocial adjustment has been lacking. Two hundred and nine parents and carers of children with a range of visible differences completed an online survey comprised of standardised outcome measures, study-specific measures, and open-ended questions. Multiple regression modelling identified possible risk and protective factors, and data collected via open-ended questions were analysed using content analysis. Findings support themes previously identified in small-scale cross-condition qualitative research with parents of children with visible differences. Risk factors for parental negative affect and stress included parental reports of the noticeability of their child\'s visible difference and teasing. Protective factors included good parent-child communication, self-compassion, knowledge of their child\'s condition and satisfaction with treatment. The risk and protective factors identified provide important insight into the experiences of this parent population and indicate possible avenues for psychosocial intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号