Cardiac surgical procedures

心脏外科手术
  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:术后心房颤动(POAF)是心脏手术后常见且潜在的严重并发症。低镁血症在心脏手术后很常见,最近的证据表明补充镁可以预防POAF。我们的目的是研究与安慰剂相比,围手术期连续静脉施用硫酸镁预防POAF的有效性。
    方法:(POMPAE)试验是第2阶段,单中心,双盲随机优势临床研究。目的评估围手术期连续静脉给予镁对心脏手术相关POAF发生的影响。总共将包括530名患者。符合条件的患者将以1:1的比例随机分配给干预或安慰剂组,并根据瓣膜手术的存在进行分层。输注的目的是将离子化镁水平维持在1.5和2.0mmol/L之间。
    结论:主要结果指标是术后前7天内从头POAF的发生率,出院时的审查。该试验可能为预防POAF提供重要证据,并减少心脏手术后患者的临床不良事件。
    背景:POMPAE试验在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,标识符如下:NTC05669417,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05669417。2022年12月30日注册。
    方法:第3.3版,日期为2023年1月13日。
    BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common and potentially serious complication post cardiac surgery. Hypomagnesaemia is common after cardiac surgery and recent evidence indicates that supplementation of magnesium may prevent POAF. We aim to investigate the effectiveness of continuous intravenous magnesium sulphate administration in the perioperative period to prevent POAF as compared to placebo.
    METHODS: The (POMPAE) trial is a phase 2, single-center, double-blinded randomized superiority clinical study. It aims to assess the impact of perioperative continuous intravenous magnesium administration on the occurrence of cardiac surgery-related POAF. A total of 530 patients will be included. Eligible patients will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to the intervention or placebo group with stratification based on the presence of valvular surgery. The objective of the infusion is to maintain ionized magnesium levels between 1.5 and 2.0 mmol/L.
    CONCLUSIONS: The primary outcome measure is the incidence of de novo POAF within the first 7 days following surgery, with censoring at hospital discharge. This trial may generate crucial evidence for the prevention of POAF and reduce clinical adverse events in patients following cardiac surgery.
    BACKGROUND: The POMPAE trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the following identifier NTC05669417, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05669417 . Registered on December 30, 2022.
    METHODS: Version 3.3, dated 13-01-2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心脏手术后的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是一种严重的呼吸系统并发症,具有高死亡率和高发病率。传统的临床方法可能导致对这种异质性综合征的认识不足,可能导致诊断延迟。这项研究旨在开发和外部验证七个机器学习(ML)模型,接受过电子健康记录数据的培训,用于预测心脏手术后的ARDS。
    方法:这个多中心,观察性队列研究包括接受心脏手术的患者在培训和测试队列中(数据来自南京市第一医院),以及在验证队列中接受心脏手术的患者(数据来自上海市总医院)。使用滑动窗口顺序前向特征选择方法(SWSFS)确定重要特征的数量。我们开发了一套基于树的机器学习模型,包括决策树,GBDT,AdaBoost,XGBoost,LightGBM,随机森林,森林深处。使用接受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和Brier评分评价模型性能。采用Shapley加法扩张(SHAP)技术来解释ML模型。此外,对ML模型和传统评分系统进行了比较.ARDS是根据柏林定义定义的。
    结果:共有1996名接受心脏手术的患者被纳入研究。SWSFS确定的前五个重要特征是慢性阻塞性肺疾病,术前白蛋白,中心静脉压T4,体外循环时间,左心室射血分数.在七种机器学习模型中,DeepForest表现最好,验证队列的AUC为0.882,Brier评分为0.809。值得注意的是,SHAP值有效地说明了归因于模型输出的13个特征的贡献以及单个特征对模型预测的影响。此外,集成ML模型表现出比其他六个传统评分系统更好的性能。
    结论:我们的研究确定了13个重要特征,并提供了多个ML模型来增强心脏手术后ARDS的风险分层。使用这些预测因子和ML模型可能为ARDS患者围手术期的早期诊断和预防策略提供基础。
    BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after cardiac surgery is a severe respiratory complication with high mortality and morbidity. Traditional clinical approaches may lead to under recognition of this heterogeneous syndrome, potentially resulting in diagnosis delay. This study aims to develop and external validate seven machine learning (ML) models, trained on electronic health records data, for predicting ARDS after cardiac surgery.
    METHODS: This multicenter, observational cohort study included patients who underwent cardiac surgery in the training and testing cohorts (data from Nanjing First Hospital), as well as those patients who had cardiac surgery in a validation cohort (data from Shanghai General Hospital). The number of important features was determined using the sliding windows sequential forward feature selection method (SWSFS). We developed a set of tree-based ML models, including Decision Tree, GBDT, AdaBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest, and Deep Forest. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Brier score. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) techinque was employed to interpret the ML model. Furthermore, a comparison was made between the ML models and traditional scoring systems. ARDS is defined according to the Berlin definition.
    RESULTS: A total of 1996 patients who had cardiac surgery were included in the study. The top five important features identified by the SWSFS were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, preoperative albumin, central venous pressure_T4, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Among the seven ML models, Deep Forest demonstrated the best performance, with an AUC of 0.882 and a Brier score of 0.809 in the validation cohort. Notably, the SHAP values effectively illustrated the contribution of the 13 features attributed to the model output and the individual feature\'s effect on model prediction. In addition, the ensemble ML models demonstrated better performance than the other six traditional scoring systems.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified 13 important features and provided multiple ML models to enhance the risk stratification for ARDS after cardiac surgery. Using these predictors and ML models might provide a basis for early diagnostic and preventive strategies in the perioperative management of ARDS patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心房颤动(AF)和心力衰竭(HF)都是常见的心血管疾病。如果两者一起存在,中风的风险,HF住院和全因死亡增加.目前,房颤和HF患者左心耳封堵术(LAAC)的研究有限且存在争议.本研究旨在研究LAAC在不同类型HF的AF患者中的安全性和有效性。
    方法:选择2014年8月至2021年7月在陆军医科大学第一附属医院接受LAAC治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)合并HF患者。根据左心室射血分数(LVEF),该研究分为射血分数降低的HF(LVEF<50%,HFrEF组)和射血分数保留的HF(LVEF≥50%,HFpEF)组。我们从患者那里收集的数据包括:性别,年龄,共病,CHA2DS2-VASc评分,BLED得分,NT-proBNP水平,残余分流,心导管检查结果,封堵器大小,术后用药方案,经胸超声心动图(TTE)结果和经食管超声心动图(TEE)结果,等。对中风患者进行了随访,出血,装置相关血栓(DRT),心包填塞,HF住院治疗,手术后2年内全因死亡。采用统计学方法比较不同类型HF房颤患者LAAC临床转归的差异。
    结果:总体而言,本研究纳入了288名患有HF的NVAF患者,其中男性142人,女性146人。HFrEF组74例,HFpEF组214例。所有患者均成功接受LAAC治疗。HFrEF组的CHA2DS2-VASc评分和HAS-BLED评分均低于HFpEF组。总共植入288个LAAC装置。封堵器平均直径HFrEF组为27.2±3.5mm,HFpEF组为26.8±3.3mm,两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.470)。此外,术后经TEE检测,两组间残余分流的发生率差异无统计学意义(P=0.341).3天时HFrEF组LVEF显著增高,术后3个月和1年较术前(P<0.001)。手术后45-60天,我们发现9例患者有DRT,HFrEF组4例(5.4%),HFpEF组5例(2.3%),两组间无显著性差异(P=0.357)。一名DRT患者中风。DRT患者的卒中发生率为11.1%,无DRT患者的卒中发生率为0.7%(P=0.670)。术后有1例心包填塞,HFpEF组在手术后24小时通过心包穿刺术得到改善,两组间差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。在平均49.7±22.4个月的随访期间,中风的发生率没有显着差异,出血,两组之间DRT和HF加重。我们发现HFrEF组与HFpEF组之间HF的改善具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。
    结论:LAAC对不同类型HF的房颤患者安全有效。与HFpEF组相比,HFrEF组LAAC后心功能的改善更为明显。
    BACKGROUND: Both atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are common cardiovascular diseases. If the two exist together, the risk of stroke, hospitalization for HF and all-cause death is increased. Currently, research on left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with AF and HF is limited and controversial. This study was designed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of LAAC in AF patients with different types of HF.
    METHODS: Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and HF who underwent LAAC in the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from August 2014 to July 2021 were enrolled. According to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the study divided into HF with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF < 50%, HFrEF) group and HF with preserved ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%, HFpEF) group. The data we collected from patients included: gender, age, comorbid diseases, CHA2DS2-VASc score, HAS-BLED score, NT-proBNP level, residual shunt, cardiac catheterization results, occluder size, postoperative medication regimen, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) results and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) results, etc. Patients were followed up for stroke, bleeding, device related thrombus (DRT), pericardial tamponade, hospitalization for HF, and all-cause death within 2 years after surgery. Statistical methods were used to compare the differences in clinical outcome of LAAC in AF patients with different types of HF.
    RESULTS: Overall, 288 NVAF patients with HF were enrolled in this study, including 142 males and 146 females. There were 74 patients in the HFrEF group and 214 patients in the HFpEF group. All patients successfully underwent LAAC. The CHA2DS2-VASc score and HAS-BLED score of HFrEF group were lower than those of HFpEF group. A total of 288 LAAC devices were implanted. The average diameter of the occluders was 27.2 ± 3.5 mm in the HFrEF group and 26.8 ± 3.3 mm in the HFpEF group, and there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.470). Also, there was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of residual shunts between the two groups as detected by TEE after surgery (P = 0.341). LVEF was significantly higher in HFrEF group at 3 days, 3 months and 1 year after operation than before (P < 0.001). At 45-60 days after surgery, we found DRT in 9 patients and there were 4 patients (5.4%) in HFrEF group and 5 patients (2.3%) in HFpEF group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.357). One patient with DRT had stroke. The incidence of stroke was 11.1% in patients with DRT and 0.7% in patients without DRT (P = 0.670). There was one case of postoperative pericardial tamponade, which was improved by pericardiocentesis at 24 h after surgery in the HFpEF group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 1.000). During a mean follow-up period of 49.7 ± 22.4 months, there were no significant differences in the incidence of stroke, bleeding, DRT and HF exacerbation between the two groups. We found a statistical difference in the improvement of HF between HFrEF group and HFpEF group (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: LAAC is safe and effective in AF patients with different types of HF. The improvement of cardiac function after LAAC is more pronounced in HFrEF group than in HFpEF group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在心脏外科手术中,高危人群患者容易发生复杂的体外循环(CPB)分离.术中经食管超声心动图(TEE),一个现成的工具,用于检测心脏结构和功能病理以及促进CPB分离的临床管理,尤其是在血液动力学受损的情况下。然而,常规TEE检查,总是以自由的方式表演,没有任何观点获取的限制,相对耗时;在严重严重的情况下,它似乎存在缺陷。因此,我们开发了围手术期抢救经食管超声心动图(PReTEE),简化的三视图TEE协议包括食管中四腔,食管中左心室长轴,和经胃短轴。
    方法:这是一项单中心随机对照试验,将在北京协和医院实施。北京,中国。计划由参与并随机分配到PReTEE或常规TEE组的6名操作员执行总共46次TEE扫描。这项研究旨在调查是否可以通过TEE视图的缩写序列显着提高区分CPB脱困的主要原因的效率。感兴趣的主要结果是PReTEE和常规TEE在指定120s内成功区分病因方面的差异。将进一步采用Cox比例风险模型来计算结果差异。
    结论:本试验的估计结果旨在验证简化的TEE检查顺序是否可以提高心脏手术CPB分离过程中病因辨别的效率。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05960552。2023年7月6日注册。
    BACKGROUND: In cardiac surgical procedures, patients carrying high-risk profiles are prone to encompass complicated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) separation. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), a readily available tool, is utilized to detect cardiac structural and functional pathologies as well as to facilitate clinical management of CPB separation, especially in the episodes of hemodynamic compromise. However, the conventional TEE examination, always performed in a liberal fashion without any restriction of view acquisition, is relatively time-consuming; there appear its flaws in the context of critically severe status. We therefore developed the perioperative rescue transesophageal echocardiography (PReTEE), a simplified three-view TEE protocol consisting of midesophageal four chamber, midesophageal left ventricular long axis, and transgastric short axis.
    METHODS: This is a single-center and randomized controlled trial which will be implemented in Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China. A total of 46 TEE scans are schemed to be performed by 6 operators participating in and randomly assigned to either the PReTEE or the conventional TEE group. This study is purposed to investigate whether the efficiency of discriminating leading causes of difficult CPB wean-off can be significantly improved via an abbreviated sequence of TEE views. The primary outcome of interest is the difference between the groups of PReTEE and the conventional TEE in the successful discrimination of etiologies in specified 120 s. Cox proportional hazards model will be further employed to calculate the outcome difference.
    CONCLUSIONS: The estimated results of this trial are oriented at verifying whether a simplified TEE exam sequence can improve the efficiency of etiologies discrimination during CPB separation in cardiac surgery.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05960552. Registered on 6 July 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的永久起搏器植入(PPI)相对频繁,及其对后续行动结果的影响仍在讨论中。以前的荟萃分析产生了相互矛盾的结果。
    为了比较有和没有PPI的TAVR患者的晚期结局,PubMed/MEDLINE,Embase,和谷歌学者被搜索报告死亡率/存活率的研究,心力衰竭(HF)再住院,中风,和/或心内膜炎伴有至少1条Kaplan-Meier曲线。我们采用了2阶段方法,根据已发表的Kaplan-Meier图重建个体患者数据。
    28项Kaplan-Meier曲线研究符合我们的资格标准,共包括50,282例患者(7232例接受PPI,42,959例未接受PPI)。在TAVR后接受PPI的患者具有显著更高的死亡风险(风险比[HR],1.21;95%CI,1.14-1.28;P<.001)和HF相关的再住院(HR,1.30;95%CI,1.17-1.45;P<.001)随时间变化。我们没有观察到中风发生率的统计学差异(HR,1.07;95%CI,0.55-2.08;P=.849)和心内膜炎(HR,0.98;95%CI,0.61-1.57;P=.925)随访期间。
    在TAVR后接受PPI的患者随着时间的推移经历更高的死亡和HF相关的再住院风险。这些发现为实施预防心脏传导障碍的程序策略提供了支持,因此,在TAVR时避免PPI。
    UNASSIGNED: Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is relatively frequent, and its impact on outcomes during follow-up remains a matter of discussion. Previous meta-analyses have yielded conflicting results.
    UNASSIGNED: To compare late outcomes in patients after TAVR with and without PPI, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for studies that reported rates of mortality/survival, rehospitalization for heart failure (HF), stroke, and/or endocarditis accompanied by at least 1 Kaplan-Meier curve for any of these outcomes. We adopted a 2-stage approach to reconstruct individual patient data on the basis of the published Kaplan-Meier graphs.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-eight studies with Kaplan-Meier curves met our eligibility criteria and included a total of 50,282 patients (7232 who underwent PPI and 42,959 who did not undergo PPI). Patients who underwent PPI after TAVR had a significantly higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14-1.28; P < .001) and HF-related rehospitalization (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.17-1.45; P < .001) over time. We did not observe statistically significant differences in the incidence of stroke (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.55-2.08; P = .849) and endocarditis (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.61-1.57; P = .925) during follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients who undergo PPI after TAVR experience higher risk of mortality and HF-related rehospitalization over time. These findings provide support for the implementation of procedural strategies to prevent heart conduction disorder and, thus, avoid PPI at the time of TAVR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心脏手术后急性肾损伤(AKI)的发展显著增加了患者的发病率和医疗费用。先前的研究已经确立了Syndecan-1(SDC-1)作为内皮损伤和随后的急性肾损伤发展的潜在生物标志物。这项研究评估了术后SDC-1水平是否可以进一步预测需要肾脏替代疗法(AKI-KRT)和AKI进展的AKI。
    方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,122名成人心脏手术患者,在2021年5月至9月期间接受了瓣膜或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)或其组合并在术后48h内发生AKI的患者接受了监测进展至2~3期AKI或是否需要KRT.我们分析了术后血清SDC-1水平与多个终点的关系。
    结果:在研究人群中,110例(90.2%)患者接受体外循环,其中30人接受了CABG或联合手术。15例患者(12.3%)需要KRT,三十八人(31.1%)发展为进行性AKI,强调严重的AKI发病率。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,SDC-1水平升高是AKI(OR=1.006)和AKI-KRT(OR=1.011)的独立危险因素。预测AKI-KRT和AKI进展的SDC-1水平的AUROC分别为0.892和0.73。优于炎性细胞因子。线性回归显示SDC-1水平与住院(β=0.014,p=0.022)和ICU住院时间(β=0.013,p<0.001)呈正相关。
    结论:术后SDC-1水平升高可显著预测心脏手术后患者的AKI进展和AKI-KRT。研究结果支持将SDC-1水平监测纳入术后护理,以改善严重AKI的早期发现和干预。
    BACKGROUND: The development of acute kidney injury (AKI) post-cardiac surgery significantly increases patient morbidity and healthcare costs. Prior researches have established Syndecan-1 (SDC-1) as a potential biomarker for endothelial injury and subsequent acute kidney injury development. This study assessed whether postoperative SDC-1 levels could further predict AKI requiring kidney replacement therapy (AKI-KRT) and AKI progression.
    METHODS: In this prospective study, 122 adult cardiac surgery patients, who underwent valve or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or a combination thereof and developed AKI within 48 h post-operation from May to September 2021, were monitored for the progression to stage 2-3 AKI or the need for KRT. We analyzed the predictive value of postoperative serum SDC-1 levels in relation to multiple endpoints.
    RESULTS: In the study population, 110 patients (90.2%) underwent cardiopulmonary bypass, of which thirty received CABG or combined surgery. Fifteen patients (12.3%) required KRT, and thirty-eight (31.1%) developed progressive AKI, underscoring the severe AKI incidence. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that elevated SDC-1 levels were independent risk factors for progressive AKI (OR = 1.006) and AKI-KRT (OR = 1.011). The AUROC for SDC-1 levels in predicting AKI-KRT and AKI progression was 0.892 and 0.73, respectively, outperforming the inflammatory cytokines. Linear regression revealed a positive correlation between SDC-1 levels and both hospital (β = 0.014, p = 0.022) and ICU stays (β = 0.013, p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Elevated postoperative SDC-1 levels significantly predict AKI progression and AKI-KRT in patients following cardiac surgery. The study\'s findings support incorporating SDC-1 level monitoring into post-surgical care to improve early detection and intervention for severe AKI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们旨在开发和验证一个列线图,用于预测接受体外循环(CPB)心脏手术的儿童术中获得性压力损伤(IAPI)的风险。
    方法:本研究回顾性纳入了2020年1月至2023年10月在中国一家三级医院接受CPB心脏手术的208名21天至8岁儿童。所有患者的数据均从医院的病历系统收集,并按7:3的比例随机分为训练组(n=146)和验证组(n=62)。在训练队列中进行Logistic回归分析以确定独立危险因素并建立列线图。最后,校正曲线,接收机工作特性(ROC)曲线,在两个队列中进行了决策曲线分析(DCA),以验证列线图的预测能力.
    结果:43(14.7%)儿童发展了IAPI。多因素分析显示,布雷登Q得分较低,使用类固醇,皮肤异常,术中低SpO2是IAPI的独立危险因素。建立了整合4个因素的列线图。在训练和验证队列中,列线图的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.836和0.903,分别。此外,校准曲线和DCA证明了列线图的良好校准和临床适用性。
    结论:我们根据CPB心脏手术患儿的特定危险因素构建了可靠的列线图,它可以用作预防IAPI的有效和方便的工具。
    BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting the risk of intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries (IAPIs) in children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
    METHODS: This study retrospectively included 208 children aged 21 days to 8 years who underwent cardiac surgery with CPB in a tertiary hospital in China between January 2020 and October 2023. All patients\' data were collected from the hospital\'s medical record system and randomly divided into the training (n = 146) and validation (n = 62) cohorts by a ratio of 7:3. Logistic regression analysis was conducted in the training cohort to identify independent risk factors and establish the nomogram. Finally, calibration curves, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed in both cohorts to validate the predictive ability of the nomogram.
    RESULTS: 43 (14.7%) children developed IAPIs. Multivariate analysis showed that low Braden Q scores, use of steroids, skin abnormalities, and low intraoperative SpO2 were independent risk factors for IAPIs. A nomogram integrating the 4 factors was established. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of the nomogram were 0.836 and 0.903 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, calibration curves and DCA demonstrated good calibration and clinical applicability of the nomogram.
    CONCLUSIONS: We constructed a reliable nomogram based on specific risk factors for children undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB, which could be used as an effective and convenient tool for prevention of IAPIs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脑灌注可能根据动脉插管部位而变化,并可能影响心脏切开术后体外生命支持(ECLS)中神经系统不良事件的发生率。当前的研究将患者的神经系统结局与三种常用的动脉插管策略进行了比较(主动脉与锁骨下/腋窝vs.股动脉),以评估每种ECLS配置是否与神经系统并发症的不同发生率相关。
    方法:本回顾性研究,多中心(34个中心),观察性研究纳入了2000年1月至2020年12月期间需要进行心脏切开术后ECLS的成年人,该研究出现在心脏切开术后体外生命支持(PELS)研究数据库中.主动脉患者,比较锁骨下/腋下和股骨插管在复合神经系统终点(缺血性卒中,脑出血,脑水肿)。次要结局是总体住院死亡率,神经系统并发症是院内死亡的原因,和术后轻微的神经系统并发症(癫痫发作)。通过线性混合效应模型研究了插管与神经系统结局之间的关联。
    结果:这项研究包括1897名患者,其中主动脉占26.5%(n=503),20.9%锁骨下/腋下(n=397)和52.6%股骨(n=997)插管。锁骨下/腋下组的高血压病史更为频繁,吸烟,糖尿病,以前的心肌梗塞,透析,外周动脉疾病和既往卒中。神经监测在所有组中都很少使用。在混合效应模型调整后,锁骨下/腋下的主要神经系统并发症更为常见(主动脉:n=79,15.8%;锁骨下/腋下:n=78,19.6%;股骨:n=118,11.9%;p<0.001)(OR1.53[95%CI1.02-2.31],p=0.041)。癫痫发作在锁骨下/腋下(n=13,3.4%)比主动脉(n=9,1.8%)和股骨插管(n=12,1.3%,p=0.036)。主动脉插管后住院死亡率更高(主动脉:n=344,68.4%,锁骨下/腋下:n=223,56.2%,股骨:n=587,58.9%,p<0.001),如Kaplan-Meier曲线所示。总之,神经系统死亡原因(主动脉:n=12,3.9%,锁骨下/腋下:n=14,6.6%,股骨:n=28,5.0%,p=0.433)相似。
    结论:在PELS研究的分析中,锁骨下/腋下插管与较高的主要神经系统并发症和癫痫发作率相关。主动脉插管后住院死亡率较高,尽管这些患者的神经系统死亡原因发生率没有显着差异。这些结果鼓励对ECLS患者的神经系统并发症和神经监测使用保持警惕,尤其是锁骨下/腋下插管。
    BACKGROUND: Cerebral perfusion may change depending on arterial cannulation site and may affect the incidence of neurologic adverse events in post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support (ECLS). The current study compares patients\' neurologic outcomes with three commonly used arterial cannulation strategies (aortic vs. subclavian/axillary vs. femoral artery) to evaluate if each ECLS configuration is associated with different rates of neurologic complications.
    METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter (34 centers), observational study included adults requiring post-cardiotomy ECLS between January 2000 and December 2020 present in the Post-Cardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Support (PELS) Study database. Patients with Aortic, Subclavian/Axillary and Femoral cannulation were compared on the incidence of a composite neurological end-point (ischemic stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, brain edema). Secondary outcomes were overall in-hospital mortality, neurologic complications as cause of in-hospital death, and post-operative minor neurologic complications (seizures). Association between cannulation and neurological outcomes were investigated through linear mixed-effects models.
    RESULTS: This study included 1897 patients comprising 26.5% Aortic (n = 503), 20.9% Subclavian/Axillary (n = 397) and 52.6% Femoral (n = 997) cannulations. The Subclavian/Axillary group featured a more frequent history of hypertension, smoking, diabetes, previous myocardial infarction, dialysis, peripheral artery disease and previous stroke. Neuro-monitoring was used infrequently in all groups. Major neurologic complications were more frequent in Subclavian/Axillary (Aortic: n = 79, 15.8%; Subclavian/Axillary: n = 78, 19.6%; Femoral: n = 118, 11.9%; p < 0.001) also after mixed-effects model adjustment (OR 1.53 [95% CI 1.02-2.31], p = 0.041). Seizures were more common in Subclavian/Axillary (n = 13, 3.4%) than Aortic (n = 9, 1.8%) and Femoral cannulation (n = 12, 1.3%, p = 0.036). In-hospital mortality was higher after Aortic cannulation (Aortic: n = 344, 68.4%, Subclavian/Axillary: n = 223, 56.2%, Femoral: n = 587, 58.9%, p < 0.001), as shown by Kaplan-Meier curves. Anyhow, neurologic cause of death (Aortic: n = 12, 3.9%, Subclavian/Axillary: n = 14, 6.6%, Femoral: n = 28, 5.0%, p = 0.433) was similar.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of the PELS Study, Subclavian/Axillary cannulation was associated with higher rates of major neurologic complications and seizures. In-hospital mortality was higher after Aortic cannulation, despite no significant differences in incidence of neurological cause of death in these patients. These results encourage vigilance for neurologic complications and neuromonitoring use in patients on ECLS, especially with Subclavian/Axillary cannulation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号