Cardiac surgical procedures

心脏外科手术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2023年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)感染性心内膜炎管理指南更新了先前的2015年指南,在五个领域具有主要的新颖性:(1)高危患者的抗生素预防,和预防中危和高危患者的措施;(2)诊断,重点是多模态成像,以评估感染性心内膜炎的心脏病变\'(3)抗生素治疗,允许门诊抗生素治疗稳定,不复杂的病例;(4)心脏手术,重点是对复杂病例的早期干预,不拖延;(5)心内膜炎团队的共同管理决策。大多数证据来自观察性研究和专家意见。该指南强烈支持以患者为中心的方法,并由多学科团队共同决策过程,应在三级转诊中心实施。成为心脏瓣膜中心,和转诊中心。在心脏瓣膜中心之间的医院网络中,有必要持续共享数据,用于复杂的感染性心内膜炎病例的转诊,和转诊中心,这应该能够处理简单的感染性心内膜炎病例。
    The 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis update the previous 2015 guidelines with main novelties in five areas: (1) antibiotic prevention for high-risk patients, and prevention measures for intermediate-risk and high-risk patients; (2) diagnosis with emphasis on multimodality imaging to assess cardiac lesions of infective endocarditis\' (3) antibiotic therapy allowing an outpatient antibiotic treatment for stabilized, uncomplicated cases; (4) cardiac surgery with an emphasis on early intervention without delay for complicated cases; and (5) shared management decision by the endocarditis team. Most evidence came from observational studies and expert opinions. The guidelines strongly support a patient-centred approach with a shared decision process by a multidisciplinary team that should be implemented either in tertiary referral centres, becoming heart valve centres, and referral centres. A continuous sharing of data is warranted in the hospitals\' network between heart valve centres, which are used for referrals for complicated cases of infective endocarditis, and referral centres, which should be able to manage uncomplicated cases of infective endocarditis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:有症状的新生儿和Ebstein异常(EA)的婴儿需要复杂的管理。美国胸外科协会委托了一组专家,以提供有关该主题的框架,重点是风险分层和管理。
    方法:EA临床先天性实践标准委员会是一个由具有EA专业知识的外科医生和心脏病学家组成的多国和多学科小组。PubMed中的引文搜索,Embase,Scopus,WebofScience使用与EA相关的关键词进行。搜索仅限于英语和2000年或以后,并产生了455个结果,其中71例与新生儿和婴儿有关。使用改进的德尔菲法开发了具有建议类别和证据水平的专家共识声明,要求80%的成员投票,对每项声明至少有75%的同意。
    结果:使用EA评估胎儿时,那些有严重心脏肥大的人,在导管水平逆行或双向分流,肺动脉瓣闭锁,圆形分流器,左心功能不全,或胎儿积水应被认为是宫内死亡和产后发病率和死亡率的高风险。患有EA和严重心脏肥大的新生儿,早产(<32周),宫内生长受限,肺动脉瓣闭锁,圆形分流器,左心功能不全,或心源性休克应被视为发病率和死亡率的高风险。具有圆形分流的血流动力学不稳定的新生儿应紧急中断圆形分流。难治性心源性休克的新生儿可以通过Starnes程序减轻。在Starnes手术后,可以评估儿童的后期双心室修复。可以监测没有EA高风险特征的新生儿的PDA自发关闭。血流动力学稳定的新生儿,有严重的肺反流,有正常RVSP的圆形分流的风险,应尝试对PDA进行医学封闭。应在患有功能性肺动脉闭锁和正常RVSP(>20-25mmHg)的新生儿中进行PDA闭合的医学试验。血流动力学稳定的新生儿,无肺返流,但顺行肺血流不足,可考虑使用PDA支架或全身性肺动脉分流术。
    结论:对于Ebstein异常的新生儿和婴儿,危险分层是必不可少的。姑息舒适护理可能是合理的新生儿与相关的危险因素,可能包括早产,遗传综合征,其他主要的医疗合并症,心室功能障碍,或者败血症.患有圆形分流的不稳定新生儿应紧急中断圆形分流。不稳定的新生儿最常见于Starnes手术。稳定的新生儿应进行导管闭合。肺血流不足的稳定新生儿可能有导管支架置入术或全身至肺动脉分流术。Starnes姑息治疗后的后续手术包括单心室姑息治疗或双心室修复策略。
    OBJECTIVE: Symptomatic neonates and infants with Ebstein anomaly (EA) require complex management. A group of experts was commissioned by the American Association for Thoracic Surgery to provide a framework on this topic focusing on risk stratification and management.
    METHODS: The EA Clinical Congenital Practice Standards Committee is a multinational and multidisciplinary group of surgeons and cardiologists with expertise in EA. A citation search in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed using key words related to EA. The search was restricted to the English language and the year 2000 or later and yielded 455 results, of which 71 were related to neonates and infants. Expert consensus statements with class of recommendation and level of evidence were developed using a modified Delphi method, requiring 80% of members votes with at least 75% agreement on each statement.
    RESULTS: When evaluating fetuses with EA, those with severe cardiomegaly, retrograde or bidirectional shunt at the ductal level, pulmonary valve atresia, circular shunt, left ventricular dysfunction, or fetal hydrops should be considered high risk for intrauterine demise and postnatal morbidity and mortality. Neonates with EA and severe cardiomegaly, prematurity (<32 weeks), intrauterine growth restriction, pulmonary valve atresia, circular shunt, left ventricular dysfunction, or cardiogenic shock should be considered high risk for morbidity and mortality. Hemodynamically unstable neonates with a circular shunt should have emergent interruption of the circular shunt. Neonates in refractory cardiogenic shock may be palliated with the Starnes procedure. Children may be assessed for later biventricular repair after the Starnes procedure. Neonates without high-risk features of EA may be monitored for spontaneous closure of the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Hemodynamically stable neonates with significant pulmonary regurgitation at risk for circular shunt with normal right ventricular systolic pressure should have an attempt at medical closure of the PDA. A medical trial of PDA closure in neonates with functional pulmonary atresia and normal right ventricular systolic pressure (>20-25 mm Hg) should be performed. Neonates who are hemodynamically stable without pulmonary regurgitation but inadequate antegrade pulmonary blood flow may be considered for a PDA stent or systemic to pulmonary artery shunt.
    CONCLUSIONS: Risk stratification is essential in neonates and infants with EA. Palliative comfort care may be reasonable in neonates with associated risk factors that may include prematurity, genetic syndromes, other major medical comorbidities, ventricular dysfunction, or sepsis. Neonates who are unstable with a circular shunt should have emergent interruption of the circular shunt. Neonates who are unstable are most commonly palliated with the Starnes procedure. Neonates who are stable should undergo ductal closure. Neonates who are stable with inadequate pulmonary flow may have ductal stenting or a systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt. Subsequent procedures after Starnes palliation include either single-ventricle palliation or biventricular repair strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    越来越多地针对创伤提出了微创手术。历史上,胸壁和/或肺的损伤是通过大口径胸腔造口管引流来管理的。而心脏损伤则要求胸骨切开术。这些治疗与显著的患者不适相关。经皮放置小型“猪尾”导管最初设计用于引流简单的心包液。它们的使用随后扩展到胸膜腔的引流。猪尾导管在创伤性气胸和血气胸的初级治疗中的作用有所增加,虽然它们在创伤后心包液的使用仍然存在争议。心包窗已被用作可能的心包积血的微创治疗选择。本文旨在回顾胸部创伤微创治疗的现有证据和指南。
    Minimally invasive procedures are being increasingly proposed for trauma. Injuries to the chest wall and/or lung have historically been managed by drainage with a large bore thoracostomy tube, while cardiac injuries have mandated sternotomy. These treatments are associated with significant patient discomfort. Percutaneous placement of small \'pigtail\' catheters was initially designed for drainage of simple pericardial fluid. Their use subsequently expanded to drainage of the pleural cavity. The role of pigtail catheters for primary treatment of traumatic pneumothorax and hemopneumothorax has increased, while their use for pericardial fluid after trauma remains controversial. Pericardial windows have alternatively been purposed as a minimally invasive treatment option for possible hemopericardium. The aim of this article is to review the current evidence and guidelines for minimally invasive management of chest trauma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的十年中,在体外循环(CPB)下接受心脏手术的患者的患者血液管理(PBM)指南有所增加。药物治疗在PBM中起着重要作用。面对多个指南中方法学质量和药物治疗建议的不确定一致性,这项研究专门评估了相关指南制定过程的方法,并编制了PBM对心脏手术患者的用药建议。从数据库建立到2023年5月15日,通过一些主流文献和指南数据库搜索CPB下心脏手术的PBM指南。9个符合纳入标准的指南纳入本研究。使用评估研究和评估指南II(AGREEII)工具评估了指南的质量。在指南中,“利益相关者参与”在AGREEII评分中获得最低的平均得分为49.38%。PBM对心脏手术患者跨越围手术期。心脏手术患者PBM的药物治疗策略包括贫血治疗,围手术期服用抗血栓药物,术中抗凝,以及使用止血药物。与成年人不同,关于小儿心脏手术患者抗血栓药物和止血药物管理的证据较少。小儿心脏手术后不推荐使用重组激活因子VII(rFVIIa)和去氨加压素(DDAVP)。而凝血酶原复合物浓缩物可以在临床试验中考虑。至于不同社会在成人心脏手术后使用rFVIIa和DDAVP的争议,临床医生应根据患者的个体特征进行临床判断。
    Patient blood management (PBM) guidelines for patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) have increased during the past decade, and pharmacotherapy plays an important role in PBM. In the face of the undefined consistency in the methodologic quality and pharmacotherapy recommendations across multiple guidelines, this study exclusively evaluated methodologies of the related guideline development process, and compiled medication recommendations of PBM for cardiac surgery patients. PBM guidelines for cardiac surgery under CPB were searched through some mainstream literature and guideline databases from database establishment to May 15, 2023. Nine guidelines meeting inclusion criteria were included in this study. The quality of the guidelines was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. \"Stakeholder involvement\" received the lowest mean score of 49.38% in the AGREE II scoring among the guidelines. PBM for cardiac surgery patients spans the perioperative phase. Drug therapy strategies of PBM for cardiac surgery patients involve anemia therapy, perioperative administration of antithrombotic drugs, intraoperative anticoagulation, and the use of hemostatic drugs. Unlike for adults, there is less evidence about the management of antithrombotic drugs and hemostatic drugs for pediatric cardiac surgery patients. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and desmopressin (DDAVP) are not recommended after pediatric cardiac surgery, whereas prothrombin complex concentrate could be considered in clinical trials. As for the controversies regarding the administration of rFVIIa and DDAVP after adult cardiac surgery by different societies, clinicians should exercise their clinical judgment based on individual patient features.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心脏手术可能通过心脏操作等多种机制导致心肌损伤和心脏生物标志物的释放。全身性炎症,心肌缺氧,冠状动脉闭塞或移植物闭塞引起的心脏停搏和缺血。定义心脏手术后围手术期心肌梗死(PMI)面临挑战,当前PMI定义与术后结局之间的关联仍不确定.为了应对这些挑战,欧洲心胸外科协会(EACTS)促进了多学科小组之间的合作,以评估有关机制的现有证据,心脏手术后PMI的诊断和预后意义。该综述发现,与死亡风险增加相关的术后肌钙蛋白值阈值明显高于目前所有PMI定义提出的阈值。此外,研究发现,即使在没有其他支持性缺血征象的情况下,术后心脏生物标志物的大量增加也与预后相关.还提出了一种用于心脏手术后PMI检测的新算法,研究小组达成共识,即在心血管领域迫切需要建立一个与预后相关的PMI定义,并且PMI应纳入冠状动脉介入治疗试验的主要复合结局.
    Cardiac surgery may lead to myocardial damage and release of cardiac biomarkers through various mechanisms such as cardiac manipulation, systemic inflammation, myocardial hypoxia, cardioplegic arrest and ischaemia caused by coronary or graft occlusion. Defining perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI) after cardiac surgery presents challenges, and the association between the current PMI definitions and postoperative outcomes remains uncertain. To address these challenges, the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) facilitated collaboration among a multidisciplinary group to evaluate the existing evidence on the mechanisms, diagnosis and prognostic implications of PMI after cardiac surgery. The review found that the postoperative troponin value thresholds associated with an increased risk of mortality are markedly higher than those proposed by all the current definitions of PMI. Additionally, it was found that large postoperative increases in cardiac biomarkers are prognostically relevant even in absence of additional supportive signs of ischaemia. A new algorithm for PMI detection after cardiac surgery was also proposed, and a consensus was reached within the group that establishing a prognostically relevant definition of PMI is critically needed in the cardiovascular field and that PMI should be included in the primary composite outcome of coronary intervention trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    《2023年胸外科医师协会关于房颤外科治疗的临床实践指南》纳入了不同临床情况下外科消融和左心耳封堵的最新证据。在过去的五年中,关于手术左心耳封堵的风险和益处以及手术消融的长期益处的大量新证据已经产生。与2017年临床实践指南相比,当前的更新重点是首次手术消融,非紧急心脏手术及其长期益处,对所有首次接受房颤的患者进行手术消融的推荐扩展,非急诊心脏手术和新的I类左心耳封堵建议适用于所有首次接受房颤的患者,非紧急心脏手术.为考虑经导管瓣膜修复或置换的结构性心脏病和心房颤动患者提供进一步指导。以及不适合手术消融术的需要隔离左心耳管理的患者。多学科团队评估的重要性,治疗计划,在本临床实践指南中重申了长期随访,并提出了I类建议,以及2017年指南的其他建议,这些建议在建议类别和证据水平上保持不变。
    The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation incorporate the most recent evidence for surgical ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion in different clinical scenarios. Substantial new evidence regarding the risks and benefits of surgical left atrial appendage occlusion and the long-term benefits of surgical ablation has been produced in the last 5 years. Compared with the 2017 clinical practice guideline, the current update has an emphasis on surgical ablation in first-time, nonemergent cardiac surgery and its long-term benefits, an extension of the recommendation to perform surgical ablation in all patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing first-time, nonemergent cardiac surgery, and a new class I recommendation for left atrial appendage occlusion in all patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing first-time, nonemergent cardiac surgery. Further guidance is provided for patients with structural heart disease and atrial fibrillation being considered for transcatheter valve repair or replacement, as well as patients in need of isolated left atrial appendage management who are not candidates for surgical ablation. The importance of a multidisciplinary team assessment, treatment planning, and long-term follow-up are reiterated in this clinical practice guideline with a class I recommendation, along with the other recommendations from the 2017 guidelines that remained unchanged in their class of recommendation and level of evidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号