Carcinoma, Mucoepidermoid

癌,粘液表皮样
  • DOI:
    文章类型: English Abstract
    目的:总结超声,Warthin样黏液表皮样癌(WT-MEC)的CT和MRI表现,并探索其成像特征,从而为临床和术前诊断提供参考。
    方法:超声的临床信息和影像学数据,12例经病理诊断为WT-MEC的CT和MRI在上海市第九人民医院,上海交通大学医学院于2017年1月至2021年12月,并对其具体特点进行回顾性总结。
    结果:在12例WT-MEC患者中,有7名男性和5名女性,平均年龄(42.7±16)岁。7例接受超声检查,6例行CT检查,2例行MRI检查。放射学上,所有病变都表现为孤立性肿块.11/12病变(91.7%)被确定为界限明确的边缘,10/12(83.3%)为囊实性肿块。所有实囊性病变都包含多个大小可变的囊性区域。在美国图像上,大多数病变表现为混合回声回声(5/7,71.4%),血管化不良(6/7,85.7%)和声学增强(6/7,85.7%)。CT显示所有病变(6/6,100%)为软组织肿块,异质性增强(5/6,83.3%)。MRI成像显示肿瘤在T1WI平面上具有低或等信号强度,在T2WI上具有高强度。在对比增强的T1WI上显示了异质增强。
    结论:大多数WT-MEC代表单独的,定义明确,腮腺囊性实性肿块。肿瘤的特征可能在于肿瘤内的多个和可变大小的囊性成分。
    OBJECTIVE: To summarize the ultrasound, CT and MRI manifestations of Warthin-like mucoepidermoid carcinoma (WT-MEC), and to explore its imaging characteristics, so as to provide reference for clinical and preoperative diagnosis.
    METHODS: The clinical information and imaging data of ultrasound, CT and MRI of 12 patients with WT-MEC diagnosed by pathology in Shanghai Ninth People\'s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from January 2017 to December 2021 were collected, and their specific characteristics were retrospectively summarized.
    RESULTS: Among the 12 WT-MEC patients, there were 7 males and 5 females, with an average age of (42.7±16) years. Seven cases underwent ultrasound examination, 6 cases underwent CT examination, and 2 cases underwent MRI examination. Radiologically, all the lesions presented as a solitary mass. 11/12 lesions(91.7%) were identified as well-defined margins, and 10/12(83.3%) as solid-cystic masses. All solid-cystic lesions contained multiple cystic areas with variable sizes. On US images, most lesions showed mixed-echoic echogenicity(5/7, 71.4%), poor vascularization (6/7, 85.7%) and acoustic enhancement (6/7, 85.7%). CT revealed all the lesions (6/6, 100%) as a soft-tissue mass with heterogeneous enhancement (5/6, 83.3%). MRI imaging demonstrated the neoplasm with low or iso-signal intensity on plain T1WI and hyperintensity on T2WI. The heterogeneous enhancement was shown on contrast-enhanced T1WI.
    CONCLUSIONS: Most WT-MECs represent as a solitary, well-defined, solid-cystic mass in the parotid gland. The neoplasm may be characterized by the multiple and variable-sized cystic components within the tumor.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: English Abstract
    目的:探讨术前全身免疫炎症指数(SII)与粘液表皮样癌(MEC)术后无复发生存期(RFS)的关系。
    方法:收集2016年1月至2019年7月在郑州大学第一附属医院行手术切除的135例MEC患者资料。并对患者的SII进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。通过ROC分析获得最佳的临界值。因此,患者的SII指数分为高组和低组,采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析。Cox比例回归模型和最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)分析影响预后的因素,并建立了一个列线图模型来预测患者的无复发生存率(RFS)。采用曲线下面积(AUC)和校正曲线对模型进行评价并验证一致性。
    结果:生存分析显示,低SII组的RFS率明显高于高SII组。Cox比例风险回归模型显示,高SII(HR=2.179,95CI:1.072-4.426,P=0.031)、低肿瘤分化(HR=6.894,95CI:2.770-17.158,P=0.000)和颈淋巴结转移(HR=2.091,95CI:1.034-4.230,P=0.040)是预后不良的显著预测因子。
    结论:术前SII越低,患者预后越好。基于SII的MEC的列线图预后是有效的。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and relapse-free survival (RFS) after surgical resection of mucoepidermoid carcinoma(MEC).
    METHODS: The data of 135 patients with MEC who underwent surgical resection in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2016 to July 2019 were collected, and the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was performed on the SII of patients. The optimal cut-off value was obtained by ROC analysis. Therefore, the patients\' SII index was divided into high and low group, and survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional regression model and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were used to analyze the factors influencing prognosis, and a nomogram model was built to predict patients\' relapse-free survival(RFS). Area under curve (AUC) and correction curve were used to evaluate the model and verify the consistency.
    RESULTS: Survival analysis showed that the RFS rate in low SII group was significantly higher than that in high SII group. Cox proportional hazard regression model showed high SII(HR=2.179, 95%CI: 1.072-4.426, P=0.031) and low tumor differentiation(HR=6.894, 95%CI: 2.770-17.158, P=0.000) and cervical lymph node metastasis (HR=2.091, 95%CI: 1.034-4.230, P=0.040) were significant predictors of poor RFS.
    CONCLUSIONS: The lower the preoperative SII, the better the prognosis of patients. The nomogram prognosis of MEC based on SII is effective.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腮腺病理学代表了鉴别诊断的网络。有许多复杂的病例需要广泛的诊断测试才能进行完整和正确的最终病理诊断。目前,腮腺肿瘤的官方分类范围超过40种亚型。我们对PubMed数据库进行了查询,以了解分子生物学测试在特定情况下对肿瘤进行更好的表征。通过使用荧光原位杂交(FISH),逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)或下一代测序,管理复杂病例的团队可以提供个性化的治疗解决方案。我们根据过去5年发表的文章对许多类型的腮腺肿瘤进行了分子鉴别诊断,从良性到交界性恶性肿瘤到恶性侵袭性肿瘤。粘液表皮样癌是腮腺恶性肿瘤的一种独特亚型,是许多文章的主题。然而,分子生物学诊断技术更有助于排除粘液表皮样癌的诊断,并可能回顾性地限制了最终诊断的病例数。在罗马尼亚,分子生物学诊断仅在有限的研究设施中可用,并且应该获得更一致的资金,这将使其在更大范围内可用。这项范围审查的新颖之处在于,我们提出了一种用于腮腺中可能遇到的肿瘤的分子鉴别诊断的算法。
    Parotid gland pathology represents a web of differential diagnoses. There are many complex cases that require extensive diagnostic tests for a complete and correct final pathology diagnosis. Currently the official classification of parotid gland tumors extends over more than 40 subtypes. We performed a query of the PubMed database regarding the use of molecular biology tests in performing a better characterization of the tumors in specific cases. By using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or next-generation sequencing, the team managing complex cases can offer a personalized therapeutic solution. We review the molecular differential diagnosis according to published articles in the last 5 years for many types of parotid gland tumors ranging from benign to borderline malign tumors to malign aggressive tumors. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is a distinct subtype of parotid malignancy that was the subject of a consistent number of articles. However, the molecular biology diagnosis techniques helped more in excluding the diagnosis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma, and probably retrospectively limiting the number of cases with this final diagnosis. In Romania, the molecular biology diagnosis is available only in limited research facilities and should receive more consistent funding that will make it available on a larger scale. The novelty of this scoping review is that we propose an algorithm for molecular differential diagnosis of the tumors that could be encountered in the parotid gland.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Objective: To analyze the risk factors affecting regional lymph node metastasis in salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and to establish a nomogram model for individually predicting lymph node metastasis in salivary gland MEC. Methods: The clinical data of 2 152 patients with salivary gland MEC from 1975 to 2020 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of the National Cancer Institute. The collected data were divided into training cohort (1 506 cases) and validation cohort (646 cases) according to the ratio of 7∶3. Single-factor regression and multi-factor logistic regression were used to screen factors related to local lymph node metastasis in salivary gland MEC, with constructing of a nomogram. Calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the ROC curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate model performance in the validation cohort and the total cohort. Statistical tests were performed using SPSS (26.0) and R (4.3.0) software. Results: Multivariate logistic regression results showed that M stage [OR(95%CI):12.360(3.295-46.365), P=0.014], pathological grade Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ[OR(95%CI): 1.956(1.329-2.879), 9.654(6.309-14.772), 9.298(6.072-14.238), P<0.001], T staging T2, T3, T4[OR(95%CI): 1.706(0.932-3.124), 3.021(1.790-5.096), 3.311(1.925-5.695), P<0.001], and gender [OR(95%CI):0.759(0.593-0.972), P=0.029] were independent factors affecting local lymph node metastasis in salivary gland MEC. Through verification in the validation cohort and the total cohort, the AUC values were greater than 0.8, and the calibration curve was close to the perfect reference line, proving that the constructed nomogram model had good specificity and sensitivity for predicting local lymph node metastasis in salivary gland MEC. Conclusion: M stage, pathological grade, T stage, and gender are risk factors for predicting regional lymph node metastasis and the established-nomogram has good predictive performance for local lymph node metastasis in salivary gland MEC.
    目的: 通过探究影响唾液腺黏液表皮样癌(mucoepidermoid carcinoma,MEC)患者局部淋巴结转移的风险因素,建立可个体化预测唾液腺MEC患者淋巴结转移的列线图模型。 方法: 收集美国国家癌症研究所监测、流行病学及最终结果(Surveillance,Epidemiology,and End Results,SEER)数据库中1975年至2020年2 152例唾液腺MEC患者的临床资料。将其按照7∶3的比例分为训练队列(1 506例)和验证队列(646例)。采用单因素回归以及多因素Logistic回归筛选与唾液腺MEC患者局部淋巴结转移相关的因素,构建列线图。在验证队列及总队列中利用校准曲线、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、ROC曲线下面积(AUC)和决策曲线评价模型性能。使用SPSS(26.0)与R(4.3.0)软件进行统计学检验。 结果: 多因素Logistic回归结果显示M分期[OR(95%CI)为12.360(3.295~46.365),P=0.014]、病理分级Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ[OR(95%CI)分别为1.956(1.329~2.879)、9.654(6.309~14.772)、9.298(6.072~14.238),P<0.001]、T分期T2、T3、T4[OR(95%CI)分别为1.706(0.932~3.124)、3.021(1.790~5.096)、3.311(1.925~5.695),P<0.001]以及性别[OR(95%CI)为0.759(0.593~0.972),P=0.029]是唾液腺MEC患者局部淋巴结转移的影响因素。经过验证队列以及总队列验证,列线图AUC值均大于0.8,校准曲线接近完美参考线。 结论: M分期、病理分级、T分期、性别是预测唾液腺MEC患者局部淋巴结转移的危险因素。据此建立的列线图具有良好的预测性能,可对唾液腺MEC患者局部淋巴结转移的概率进行个体化预测。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景与目的:粘蛋白通过多种机制参与肿瘤细胞的发育和生长。然而,唾液腺肿瘤中粘蛋白表达的研究是有限的,尤其是小唾液腺的样本。这项研究旨在调查和比较粘蛋白在次要和主要唾液腺起源的良性和恶性唾液腺肿瘤中的表达。材料和方法:使用特殊染色剂对中性粘蛋白(高碘酸希夫)进行染色,来自六个正常唾液腺和73个唾液腺肿瘤的组织内的唾液酸粘蛋白(AlcianBlue)和磺粘蛋白(AldehideFuschin),包括31个多形性腺瘤,27例粘液表皮样癌,和15例腺样囊性癌.半定量方法用于评估导管腔内的粘蛋白表达。唾液酸粘蛋白是所有唾液腺肿瘤中表达最多的粘蛋白,不管起源。结果:良性和恶性唾液腺肿瘤之间的粘蛋白表达存在显着差异,与粘液表皮样癌和腺样囊性癌相比,多形性腺瘤显示唾液粘蛋白的表达明显高出三倍(p=0.028)。与次要腺体相比,主要腺体的多形性腺瘤显示出42倍的唾液酸粘表达(p=0.000)。结论:与小腺体相比,大腺体多形性腺瘤中的唾液酸蛋白含量大大增加。唾液粘蛋白在良性和恶性唾液腺肿瘤中的差异表达表明在诊断交界性唾液腺肿瘤中的作用。
    Background and Objectives: Mucin has been implicated via various mechanisms in the development and growth of tumour cells. However, mucin expression studies in salivary gland tumours are limited, especially with samples from minor salivary glands. This study aims to investigate and compare mucin expression in benign and malignant salivary gland tumours of minor and major salivary gland origins. Materials and Methods: Special stains were used to stain neutral mucin (Periodic acid Schiff), sialomucin (Alcian Blue) and sulfomucin (Aldehyde Fuschin) within tissues from six normal salivary glands and 73 salivary gland tumours including 31 pleomorphic adenomas, 27 mucoepidermoid carcinomas, and 15 adenoid cystic carcinomas. A semi-quantitative approach was used to evaluate mucin expression within ductal lumens. Sialomucin was the most expressed mucin in all salivary gland tumours, regardless of origin. Results: A significant difference was observed in the mucin expression between benign and malignant salivary gland tumours, as pleomorphic adenoma showed three times significantly higher expression of sialomucin compared to mucoepidermoid carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma (p = 0.028). Pleomorphic adenomas of major glands showed 42 times significantly higher expression of sialomucin compared to those of minor glands (p = 0.000). Conclusions: Sialomucin content in pleomorphic adenomas of major glands was vastly increased compared to that in minor glands. Differential sialomucin expression in benign and malignant salivary gland tumours suggests a role in diagnosing of borderline salivary gland tumours.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿童原发性肺癌极为罕见,发病率低于2/100,0000,和肺粘液表皮样癌(PMEC),甚至更罕见。他们的症状通常不是特异性的,他们的管理没有指导方针,这使得他们的临床管理成为儿科医生的挑战。本报告的目的是讨论临床表现,积极的迹象,考试,病理特征,手术方式,化疗方案,和儿童的预后。回顾性分析2021年6月至2022年11月在重庆医科大学附属儿童医院确诊的4例PMEC患者的临床资料。和他们的临床特征,治疗,并对预后进行总结。其中,两名男性,两名女性;他们的年龄从3岁零10个月到10岁零11个月不等,均按肿瘤淋巴结转移分型(TNM)分期。对所有儿童进行免疫组织化学检查,其中4例细胞角蛋白(CK)阳性,2例CK7阳性,4例p63阳性,约5-10%的肿瘤细胞Ki67阳性。在四个孩子中,3人单独接受了手术,1人接受了手术+化疗。所有四个孩子目前都在生活,没有肿瘤复发或转移的证据。PMEC在儿童中非常罕见,它的发病年龄和症状并不具体,与性别无明显相关性。其诊断主要依靠病理形态学诊断,而免疫组化检测则没有特异性表现。PMEC患儿的预后与临床分期及是否进行手术有关。对于不能接受手术切除的患者和合并远处转移的患者,是否需要进一步的化疗或放疗,需要进一步的临床研究。
    4例儿童肺黏液表皮样癌的临床表现和治疗儿童期肺癌极为罕见,发生率小于2/1000000,一种称为肺粘液表皮样癌(PMEC)的肺癌,甚至更罕见。症状通常不是特异性的,它的管理没有指导方针,这对医生来说是一个挑战。本报告的目的是讨论医学检查的体征和症状,疾病特征,外科手术,儿童肺黏液表皮样癌的化疗方案和预后。分析重庆医科大学附属儿童医院2021年6月至2022年11月4例确诊为肺黏液表皮样癌患者的临床资料。和他们的临床特征,对治疗及预后进行总结。四个孩子目前都还活着,治疗后肿瘤无复发或扩散。我们已经讨论了疾病的各个方面,例如发生率,原因,症状和体征,它可能被诊断和治疗的方式,手术后的存活率,希望为今后的工作提供一些启示。
    Primary lung cancer in childhood is extremely rare, with an incidence rate of less than 2/100,0000, and pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (PMEC), is even rarer. Their symptoms are usually not specific, and there are no guidelines for their management, which makes their clinical management a challenge for pediatricians. The purpose of this report is to discuss the clinical presentation, positive signs, examinations, pathological characteristics, surgical modalities, chemotherapy regimens, and prognosis in children. The clinical data of four patients diagnosed with PMEC at the Children\'s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from June 2021 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, and their clinical features, treatment, and prognosis were summarized. Among them, two were male and two were female; their ages ranged from 3 years and 10 months to 10 years and 11 months, and all were staged according to tumor node metastasis classification (TNM). Immunohistochemical tests were performed in all children, among which four cases were positive for cytokeratin (CK), two cases were positive for CK7, four cases were positive for p63, about 5-10% of tumor cells were positive for Ki67. Among the four children, three had surgery alone and one had surgery + chemotherapy. All four children are presently living, with no evidence of tumor recurrence or metastasis. PMEC in children is very rare, and its age of onset and symptoms are not specific, and there is no obvious correlation with gender. Its diagnosis mainly relies on pathomorphological diagnosis, and immunohistochemical detection has no specific performance. The prognosis of children with PMEC is related to the clinical stage and whether surgery is performed. Whether further chemotherapy or radiotherapy is needed for patients who cannot undergo surgical resection and for those who have a combination of distant metastases requires further clinical studies.
    Clinical presentation and treatment of 4 children with pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinomaLung cancer in childhood is extremely rare, occurring at a rate of less than 2/1000000, and a type of lung cancer called pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (PMEC), is even rarer. The symptoms are usually not specific, and there are no guidelines for its management, which is a challenge for doctors. The purpose of this report is to discuss the signs and symptoms medical examinations, disease characteristics, surgical procedures, chemotherapy regimens and prognosis in children with pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma. The clinical data of four patients diagnosed with pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma at the Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from June 2021 to November 2022 were analyzed, and their clinical features, treatment and prognosis were summarized. All four children are currently alive, and there is no recurrence or spread of the tumor after treatment. We have discussed various aspects of the disease, such as the rate of occurrence, causes, signs and symptoms, the way in which it might be diagnosed and treated, and the survival rate after operation, hoping to provide some insights for future work.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:虽然一些研究报道了唾液腺癌(SGC)中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的表达,由于缺乏EGFR阳性的统一定义,结果各不相同.在这项研究中,我们使用EGFR阳性评分和EGFR累积评分评估了SGC患者的EGFR表达水平.
    方法:2010年1月至2021年4月,对102例接受手术切除的SGC患者进行免疫组织化学回顾性分析。膜染色强度评分如下:无染色(0),弱染色(1+),中间染色(2+),和强染色(3+)。使用公式:IX(1+:弱染色细胞的百分比)+2X(2+:中度染色细胞的百分比)+3X(3+:强染色细胞的百分比)在0-300的连续标度上确定累积EGFR得分。
    结果:EGFR在SGC中的表达差异很大,即使在相同和不同的组织病理学类型中也是如此。平均EGFR阳性评分为46.0%,55.7%,51.6%,1.0%,26.8%,50%,粘液表皮样癌(MEC)占76.8%,涎管癌(SDC),腺样囊性癌(AdCC),腺泡细胞癌(AcCC),腺癌NOS(ACNOS),多形性腺瘤(CAexPA),鳞状细胞癌(SqCC),分别。MEC的平均累积EGFR评分分别为82、91、80、1、52、93和185。SDC,AdCC,AcCC,ACNOS,CAexPA,和SqCC,分别。
    结论:SGC的EGFR阳性评分和累积EGFR评分在不同组织学类型之间有所不同,甚至在相同的组织学类型。这些评分可以预测EGFR靶向治疗的SGC的临床结果。例如头颈部光免疫疗法,并需要在未来的研究中进行评估。
    OBJECTIVE: While several studies reported epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in salivary gland cancer (SGC), results varied due to a lack of unified definition of EGFR positivity. In this study, we assessed the EGFR expression level using both EGFR positive score and cumulative EGFR score in the patients with SGC.
    METHODS: Between January 2010 and April 2021, 102 patients with SGC who underwent surgical resection were reviewed retrospectively by immunohistochemistry. The membrane staining intensity was scored as follows: no staining (0), weak staining (1+), intermediate staining (2+), and strong staining (3+). The cumulative EGFR score was determined on a continuous scale of 0-300 using the formula:1 × (1+: percentage of weakly stained cells) + 2 × (2+: percentage of moderately stained cells) + 3 × (3+: percentage of strongly stained cells).
    RESULTS: EGFR expression in SGC varied widely even among the same as well as different histopathological types. The average EGFR positive scores were 46.0 %, 55.7 %, 51.6 %, 1.0 %, 26.8 %, 50 %, and 76.8 % for mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), salivary duct carcinoma (SDC), adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC), acinic cell carcinoma (AcCC), adenocarcinoma NOS (ACNOS), carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CAexPA), and squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC), respectively. The average cumulative EGFR scores were 82, 91, 80, 1, 52, 93, and 185 for MEC, SDC, AdCC, AcCC, ACNOS, CAexPA, and SqCC, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: EGFR positive scores and cumulative EGFR scores in SGCs varied among the various histological types, and even in the same histological type. These scores may predict the clinical outcome of SGC treated with EGFR-targeting therapies, such as head and neck photoimmunotherapy, and need to be evaluated in future studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于程序性细胞死亡配体(PD-L)-1和PD-L2在唾液腺癌中的作用的数据有限。我们旨在评估PD-L1和PD-L2表达的预后价值,与免疫机制密切相关,关于唾液腺肿瘤类型和分期。数据来自2006年至2021年之间手术切除的唾液腺肿块患者,诊断为恶性唾液腺肿瘤,进行回顾性分析。对切除材料进行PD-L1和PD-L2的免疫反应性。90例患者的平均年龄为52.1±18.8,男性占46.7%。总的来说,55.6%的患者诊断为腺样囊性癌(ACC),23.3%合并粘液表皮样癌(MEC),16.7%伴有腺泡细胞癌(AciCC),3.3%患有导管癌(DC),1例多形性腺瘤出癌(PA-ex-CA)。总之,52%的ACC,12%的AcCC,24%的MEC,12%的DC病例处于IV期。肿瘤直径,淋巴管浸润的频率,转移,切缘阳性,复发,III期和IV期患者的死亡率明显高于I期和II期患者(P<0.05)。与其他类型肿瘤患者相比,MEC患者PD-L1的肿瘤细胞评分(TCS)和免疫细胞评分(ICS)的百分比明显更高(P=0.0011)。然而,PD-L1的联合评分(CS)百分比和PD-L2的肿瘤细胞评分百分比在肿瘤类型之间具有可比性(P>0.05)。肿瘤分期之间PD-L1评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但对于PD-L2,所有I期患者的PD-L2TCS<1%,而所有II期和III期患者,92%的IV期患者TCS≥1%(P<0.0001)。PD-L1的高表达主要在MEC病例中观察到(P=0.0016),而所有AciCC患者的PD-L1表达水平均较低(P=0.0206)。肿瘤的平均直径,淋巴管浸润率,神经周浸润,转移,切缘阳性,复发,治疗类型,死亡率,根据PD-L1的表达水平,TILs的比率没有显着差异(P>0.05)。根据1%和5%阈值,阴性和阳性PD-L1评分中肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞的百分比相当(P>0.05)。高PD-L1表达在AcCC中很少见,而PD-L1在MEC中表达较高。我们的发现强调了在所有唾液腺肿瘤患者接受免疫疗法之前未来筛查PD-L1和PD-L2的重要性。
    There is a limited amount of data on the role of programmed cell death ligand (PD-L) -1 and PD-L2 in salivary gland carcinomas. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of PD-L1 and PD-L2 expressions, which are closely related to immune mechanisms, with respect to salivary gland tumor types and stages. Data from patients with salivary gland masses surgically removed between 2006 and 2021, diagnosed with a malignant salivary gland neoplasm, were retrospectively analyzed. Immunoreactivity for PD-L1 and PD-L2 was performed on resection materials. The mean age of 90 patients was 52.1±18.8 and 46.7% were male. Overall, 55.6% of patients were diagnosed with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), 23.3% with mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), 16.7% with acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC), 3.3% with ductal carcinoma (DC), and 1 patient with pleomorphic adenoma ex carcinoma (PA-ex-CA). In all, 52% of ACC, 12% of AciCC, 24% of MEC, and 12% of DC cases were at stage IV. The tumor diameter, frequencies of lymphovascular invasion, metastasis, positive surgical margin, recurrence, and mortality rates of patients at stages III and IV were significantly larger than those at stages I and II ( P <0.05). The percentages of tumor cell score (TCS) and immune cell score (ICS) for PD-L1 were significantly higher among patients with MEC compared with those with other types of tumors ( P =0.0011). However, the percentages of combined score (CS) for PD-L1 and tumor cell score for PD-L2 were comparable among tumor types ( P >0.05). No significant difference was found in these scores for PD-L1 between tumor stages ( P >0.05), but for PD-L2, all patients at stage I had TCS <1% for PD-L2, while all patients at stages II and III, and 92% of patients at stage IV had TCS ≥1% ( P <0.0001). High expression of PD-L1 was mostly observed in MEC cases ( P =0.0016), while all patients with AciCC had a low PD-L1 expression level ( P =0.0206). The mean tumor diameter, rate of lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, metastasis, positive surgical margin, recurrence, type of treatment, mortality, and TILs ratio did not differ significantly according to PD-L1 expression level ( P >0.05). The percentage of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was comparable among negative and positive PD-L1 scores according to both 1% and 5% threshold values ( P >0.05). High PD-L1 expression is rare in AciCC, while PD-L1 expression is high in MEC. Our findings underline the importance of future screening for PD-L1 and PD-L2 before patients undergoing immunotherapies in all salivary gland tumors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:食管粘液表皮样癌(MECE)是一种相对罕见的肿瘤类型,目前大部分数据来自病例报告或小样本研究。这项回顾性研究报告了48例食管MEC患者的10年生存数据和详细的临床病理特征。
    方法:收集2004年1月1日至2020年12月31日在河北医科大学第四医院接受食管MEC根治性手术的48例患者的资料。将这些与同期的食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)和食管腺癌(EAC)病例进行比较。采用Kaplan-Meier方法和多元Cox回归分析,我们调查了影响MEC患者生存的临床病理因素.
    结果:男性MECE的发生率主要较高,男女比例约为7:1。胸中段是最常见的发生部位。只有6.3%的病例在术前得到正确诊断。淋巴结转移率为35.4%。整体1年,3年,5年,所有患者的10年生存率为85.4%,52.1%,37.0%,和31.0%,分别。后1:1倾向得分匹配,MEC患者与食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)和食管腺癌(EAC)患者的总生存期(OS)差异无统计学意义(P=0.119,P=0.669)。单因素分析显示T分期和N分期是影响食管MEC预后的主要因素。
    结论:男性比女性更频繁地发生MECE,胸中段是最常见的发生部位。术前内镜诊断准确率低。病变长度短但表现出明显的壁外侵袭的特征可能是MECE的关键临床病理特征。MEC患者的OS与食管鳞癌和腺癌患者的OS没有显着差异。
    BACKGROUND: Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Esophagus (MECE) is a relatively rare tumor type, with most of the current data derived from case reports or small sample studies. This retrospective study reports on the 10-year survival data and detailed clinicopathological characteristics of 48 patients with esophageal MEC.
    METHODS: Data were collected from 48 patients who underwent curative surgery for esophageal MEC at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020. These were compared with contemporaneous cases of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC) and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EAC). Using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox regression analysis, we investigated the clinicopathological factors affecting the survival of patients with MEC.
    RESULTS: The incidence of MECE was predominantly higher in males, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 7:1. The mid-thoracic segment emerged as the most common site of occurrence. A mere 6.3% of cases were correctly diagnosed preoperatively. The lymph node metastasis rate stood at 35.4%. The overall 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates for all patients were 85.4%, 52.1%, 37.0%, and 31.0%, respectively. Post 1:1 propensity score matching, no significant statistical difference was observed in the Overall Survival (OS) between MEC patients and those with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC) and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EAC) (P = 0.119, P = 0.669). Univariate analysis indicated that T staging and N staging were the primary factors influencing the prognosis of esophageal MEC.
    CONCLUSIONS: MECE occurs more frequently in males than females, with the mid-thoracic segment being the most common site of occurrence. The rate of accurate preoperative endoscopic diagnosis is low. The characteristic of having a short lesion length yet exhibiting significant extramural invasion may be a crucial clinicopathological feature of MECE. The OS of patients with MEC does not appear to significantly differ from those with esophageal squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:唾液腺肿瘤(SGT)是罕见且高度异质性的病变,使诊断成为一项具有挑战性的活动。此外,评估的研究和样本数量少,很难确定预后和诊断。尽管研究取得了坚实的进展,仍然迫切需要研究用于诊断的生物标志物,预后并解释SGT的演变和进展。
    方法:我们对最常见的恶性SGT:粘液表皮样癌和腺样囊性癌的分子改变进行了全面的文献综述。
    结果:由于生物标志物在致瘤过程中的重要性,这篇综述旨在探讨相关机制,并描述分子和生物标志物通路,以更好地了解唾液腺肿瘤发生的病理生理学的某些方面。
    结论:分子分析不仅对于改善肿瘤的诊断和预后至关重要,而且对于确定精准医学方案中的新驱动途径也至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Salivary gland tumors (SGTs) are rare and highly heterogeneous lesions, making diagnosis a challenging activity. In addition, the small number of studies and samples evaluated difficults the determination of prognosis and diagnosis. Despite the solid advances achieved by research, there is still an intense need to investigate biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and that explain the evolution and progression of SGTs.
    METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature review of the molecular alterations focusing on the most frequent malignant SGTs: mucoepidermoid carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma.
    RESULTS: Due to the importance of biomarkers in the tumorigenenic process, this review aimed to address the mechanisms involved and to describe molecular and biomarker pathways to better understand some aspects of the pathophysiology of salivary gland tumorigenesis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Molecular analysis is essential not only to improve the diagnosis and prognosis of the tumors but also to identify novel driver pathways in the precision medicine scenario.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号