目的:我们检查了上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者中碳水化合物抗原125-Thomsen-nouveau(CA125-Tn)和抗苗勒管激素(AMH)的血液浓度,以评估其潜在的诊断效用以及CA125,人附睾蛋白4(HE4)和恶性肿瘤风险算法(ROMA)。
方法:50名健康受试者,45名EOC患者,22例卵巢交界性肿瘤(BOT),研究了21例卵巢良性肿瘤(BET)和45例卵巢巧克力囊肿(CCO)患者。检测血清CA125、HE4、CA125-Tn和AMH水平,并计算ROMA值。我们比较了各组之间这些生物标志物水平的差异。此外,为了最大限度地提高诊断价值,我们共建立了10种检测策略进行比较.
结果:与疾病控制(DC)组相比,EOC组的CA125,HE4,CA125-Tn和ROMA值均显着升高(BOT组,BET组和CCO组)或健康对照(HC)组(p<0.001)。此外,与AMH0.67的AUC值(p<0.001)相比,受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.93;0.93;0.93;0.85(p<0.001)。在所有10种测试策略中,ROMA的单阳性和任何2个标记的双阳性均显示出更好的Youden指数(分别为0.82、0.79)和κ值(κ)(分别为0.82、0.81)。
结论:当与CA125、HE4和ROMA联合使用时,CA125-Tn和AMH可被视为EOC的有用生物标志物,因为当它们中的任何两个生物标志物都是阳性时,EOC诊断价值最大化。
OBJECTIVE: We examined the blood concentrations of Carbohydrate Antigen 125-Thomsen-nouveau (CA125-Tn) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients to evaluate their potential diagnostic utility together with CA125, human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and Risk of Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA).
METHODS: 50 healthy subjects, 45 EOC patients, 22 patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOT), 21 patients with benign ovarian tumor (BET) and 45 patients with chocolate cyst of ovary (CCO) were studied. Blood levels of CA125, HE4, CA125-Tn and AMH were measured, and the ROMA value was calculated. We compared the differences in the levels of these biomarkers among groups. Additionally, a total of 10 testing strategies were established for comparison to maximize the diagnostic value.
RESULTS: The levels of CA125, HE4, CA125-Tn and ROMA value were significantly higher in EOC group compared with either the disease control (DC) group (BOT group, BET group and CCO group) or healthy control (HC) group (p < 0.001). In addition, they had better discriminatory performance with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) 0.93; 0.93; 0.93; 0.85, respectively (p < 0.001) compared with the AUC value of AMH 0.67 (p < 0.001). Among all 10 testing strategies, both single-positive of ROMA and double-positive of any 2 markers showed better Youden index (0.82, 0.79, respectively) and kappa value (κ) (0.82, 0.81, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: CA125-Tn and AMH can be treated as useful biomarkers of EOC when combined with CA125, HE4 and ROMA, because when any two biomarkers of them are positive, the value of EOC diagnosis is maximized.