We present two cases of metastatic colorectal cancer where a liver injury developed while receiving capecitabine. In both cases, the patients were switched from oral capecitabine to a continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil infusion and were able to continue treatment without a relapse of hepatotoxicity.

A 48-year-old man who presented with asymptomatic gross hematuria in July 202X had been followed up without treatment. In January 202X, he was referred to our department due to the exacerbation of his hematuria. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging revealed bladder cancer suggested bilateral seminal vesicle and prostate invasion, and enlarged right internal and external iliac lymph nodes. The pathological diagnosis was mucinous bladder adenocarcinoma. Prostate biopsy results were negative. Upper and lower gastrointestinal examinations were unremarkable. We suspected bladder cancer cT4aN2M0. In March 202X＋1, the patient underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic total bladder resection, pelvic lymph node dissection, and intracorporeal urinary tract modification (ileal conduit creation). The final diagnosis was primary mucinous adenocarcinoma pT4aN2M0 of the bladder. Given the heightened risk of recurrence, the patient was administered a three-month course of oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) as adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy. The patient remains free of progression at 8 months postoperatively. Adenocarcinoma of the bladder is an exceedingly rare entity, with no established chemotherapeutic protocols. Primary mucinous adenocarcinoma of the bladder is even more exceptional. Presently, only regimens similar to those for colorectal cancer or adenocarcinoma of unknown primary, including 5-fluorouracil, are considered. In our particular case, we elected to pursue XELOX therapy, aligning with the principles governing the management of colorectal cancer.

UNASSIGNED: Capecitabine has been reported to be associated with severe gastrointestinal (GI) adverse drug reactions (gastrointestinal ulceration, haemorrhage, and obstruction). However, statistical correlations have not been demonstrated, and specific GI adverse drug reactions, such as GI obstruction, are not listed on its label.
UNASSIGNED: We aimed to determine the associations between capecitabine and GI ulceration, haemorrhage, or obstruction among patients with breast cancer by examining data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
UNASSIGNED: We performed disproportionality analysis of GI ulceration, haemorrhage, and obstruction by evaluating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
UNASSIGNED: We identified 279 patients with capecitabine-associated GI ulceration, haemorrhage, or obstruction reported between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2020. One-fourth of the cases of GI ulceration, haemorrhage, or obstruction resulted in death. Capecitabine as a drug class had disproportionately high reporting rates for GI ulceration [ROR 1.94 (1.71-2.21); IC 0.80 (0.60-0.99)], haemorrhage [ROR 2.27 (1.86-2.76); IC 0.99 (0.69-1.28)], and obstruction [ROR 2.19 (1.63-2.95); IC 0.96 (0.51-1.40)].
UNASSIGNED: Pharmacovigilance research on the FAERS has revealed a slight increase in reports of GI ulceration, haemorrhage, and obstruction in capecitabine users, which may cause serious or deadly consequences. In addition to the adverse reactions described in the package insert, close attention should be paid to GI obstruction to avoid discontinuation or life-threatening outcomes.

This research focused on developing pH-regulated intelligent networks using quince and mimosa seed mucilage through aqueous polymerization to sustain Capecitabine release while overcoming issues like short half-life, high dosing frequency, and low bioavailability. The resulting MSM/QSM-co-poly(MAA) hydrogel was evaluated for several parameters, including complex structure formation, stability, pH sensitivity, morphology, and elemental composition. FTIR, DSC, and TGA analyses confirmed the formation of a stable, complex cross-linked network, demonstrating excellent stability at elevated temperatures. SEM analysis revealed the hydrogels\' smooth, fine texture with porous surfaces. PXRD and EDX results indicated the amorphous dispersion of Capecitabine within the network. The QMM9 formulation achieved an optimal Capecitabine loading of 87.17 %. The gel content of the developed formulations ranged from 65.21 % to 90.23 %. All formulations exhibited excellent swelling behavior, with ratios between 65.91 % and 91.93 % at alkaline pH. In vitro dissolution studies indicated that up to 98 % of Capecitabine was released after 24 h at pH 7.4, demonstrating the potential for sustained release. Furthermore, toxicological evaluation in healthy rabbits confirmed the system\'s safety, non-toxicity, and biocompatibility.

OBJECTIVE: Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) therapy is standard strategy for colorectal cancer with risk of recurrence. Early dose reduction (EDR) of CAPOX therapy is commonly used in real-world practice. However, there is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of CAPOX for patients who had EDR. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the risks of EDR and its effect on long-term outcomes and body composition factors.
METHODS: Patients who received CAPOX therapy after radical surgery for colorectal cancer between June 2013 and December 2021 were included. EDR was defined as dose reduction within four courses of CAPOX therapy. Body composition factors were measured for 1 year following surgery to determine the EDR effects.
RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were included; 35 (42%) of them had EDR. The multivariate analysis revealed that underweight [odds ratio (OR)=4.95, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.13-21.7, p=0.03] was a risk factor for EDR. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was significantly better in the non-EDR group (p=0.01). The 5-year RFS rates for the non-EDR and EDR groups were 88.7% and 65.4%, respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed that age >65 years [hazard ratio (HR)=3.97; 95% CI=1.16-13.62, p=0.03] and EDR (HR=7.62; 95% CI=1.71-33.91, p=0.005) were associated with poorer RFS. The 1-year body composition analysis revealed decreases in all factors in the EDR group.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative underweight status was associated with EDR, which resulted in decreased RFS and body composition factors when compared with the non-EDR group. Therefore, avoiding EDR and early nutritional intervention after EDR may improve outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine has been widely prescribed to treat various cancers. The hand foot syndrome (HFS) is the most troublesome adverse effect. Urea cream has been pre-emptively co-prescribed, even though its efficacy is doubtful. Aloe vera gel with urea cream might potentiate each other. This trial was intended to prove the efficacy of this combination.
METHODS: The investigators conducted a randomized single-blinded phase II study. The participants were randomized 1:1 to receive the combination of aloe vera gel and 10% urea cream (n = 30), the experimental A+U arm and 10% urea cream alone (n = 31), the U arm. The sample size was calculated to have 90% power to show the significant 20% reduction in the incidence of HFS grade 2-3 of the combination therapy with alpha level = 0.05. Both the CTCAE criteria version 5 and the dermatology life quality index (DLQI) were assessed to determine the severity of HFS and quality of life, respectively.
RESULTS: Most of the participants had rectal cancer (A+U: 43.3%; U: 41.9%). In the A+U group, 86.7% had grade 0-1 HFS and 13.3% had grade 2-3 HFS. In the U group, 64.5% had grade 0-1 HFS and 35.5% had grade 2-3 HFS (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.045). Grade 2-3 HFS was significantly lower in the combination group.
CONCLUSIONS: Combination of aloe vera gel and 10% urea cream ameliorated the severity of HFS in participants taking capecitabine; however, no significant difference in DLQI between the groups was demonstrated.

Background and purpose: Capecitabine can be used as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. However, real-world data on efficacy of capecitabine in this setting is sparse. The purpose of the study is to evaluate outcomes of patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER2)-normal advanced breast cancer treated with capecitabine monotherapy as first-line treatment.
METHODS: The study utilized the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) database and was conducted retrospectively across all Danish oncology departments. Inclusion criteria were female patients, with HER2-normal advanced breast cancer treated with capecitabine monotherapy as the first-line treatment from 2010 to 2020. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: A total of 494 patients were included. Median OS was 16.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.5-18.0), and median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI: 5.3-6.7). Patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease had significantly longer OS (median: 22.8 vs. 10.5 months, p < 0.001) and PFS (median: 7.4 vs. 4.9 months, p = 0.003), when compared to ER-negative patients. Stratifying by age, patients under 45 years displayed a median PFS of 4.1 months, while those aged 45-70 years and over 70 years had median PFS of 5.7 and 7.2 months, respectively (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS:  In this nationwide study, the efficacy of capecitabine as a first-line treatment for HER2-normal advanced breast cancer is consistent with other, mainly retrospective, studies. However, when assessed against contemporary and newer treatments, its effectiveness appears inferior to alternative chemotherapies or targeted therapies.

To compare the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (nab-TPC) with gemcitabine and cisplatin as an alternative first line treatment option for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Phase 3, open label, multicentre, randomised trial.
Four hospitals located in China between September 2019 and August 2022.
Adults (≥18 years) with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with either nab-paclitaxel (200 g/m2 on day 1), cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1), and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice on days 1-14) or gemcitabine (1 g/m2 on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1).
Progression-free survival was evaluated by the independent review committee as the primary endpoint in the intention-to-treat population.
The median follow-up was 15.8 months in the prespecified interim analysis (31 October 2022). As assessed by the independent review committee, the median progression-free survival was 11.3 (95% confidence interval 9.7 to 12.9) months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 7.7 (6.5 to 9.0) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort. The hazard ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.73; P=0.002). The objective response rate in the nab-TPC cohort was 83% (34/41) versus 63% (25/40) in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.05), and the duration of response was 10.8 months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 6.9 months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.009). Treatment related grade 3 or 4 adverse events, including leukopenia (4/41 (10%) v 13/40 (33%); P=0.02), neutropenia (6/41 (15%) v 16/40 (40%); P=0.01), and anaemia (1/41 (2%) v 8/40 (20%); P=0.01), were higher in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort than in the nab-TPC cohort. No deaths related to treatment occurred in either treatment group. Survival and long term toxicity are still being evaluated with longer follow-up.
The nab-TPC regimen showed a superior antitumoural efficacy and favourable safety profile compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Nab-TPC should be considered the standard first line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the benefits for overall survival.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900027112.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of Gemcitabine (GEM) plus Capecitabine (CAP) for advanced triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC).
METHODS: Eighty aTNBC patients treated in Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between June 2020 and June 2022 were retrospectively included and divided into an observation group (Obs; 42 cases treated with GEM + CAP) and a control group (Con; 38 cases treated with docetaxel + CAP) according to different chemotherapy regimens. The clinical effectiveness and the serum levels of tumor markers and inflammatory factors pre- and post-treatment were detected for comparative analyses. In addition, the two groups were compared in terms of side effects, 1-year survival, and quality of life after 1 month of treatment. Cox regression was performed to identify the independent risk factors affecting patient prognosis.
RESULTS: Higher clinical effectiveness was observed in the Obs group compared to the Con (P < 0.05). The pre-treatment TPS, CA153, TNF-α, and IL-6 levels were comparable between groups (all P > 0.05); however, better post-treatment TPS, CA153, and inflammatory factors were observed in the Obs group compared to the Con (all P < 0.05). The Obs group also showed markedly lower drug-induced toxicities than the Con group, with higher 1-year survival and better quality-of-life after 1 month of treatment (all P < 0.05). According to multivariate analysis, clinical stage and lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for poor prognosis, and GEM + CAP chemotherapy was a protective prognostic factor.
CONCLUSIONS: GEM + CAP is effective in treating aTNBC and provides clinical benefit for patients, with fewer side effects and good patient tolerance.

OBJECTIVE: Fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy is important for treatment of many solid tumours but is associated with cardiotoxicity. The relationship of fluoropyrimidine-associated cardiotoxicity (FAC) with conventional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors is poorly understood, and standard cardiovascular risk scores are not validated in this context.
RESULTS: Single-centre retrospective study of patients treated with fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy using electronic health records for cardiovascular risk factors (and calculation of QRISK3 score), cancer treatment, and clinical outcomes. FAC was defined by cardiovascular events during or within 3 months of fluoropyrimidine treatment, and Cox regression was used to assess associations of CV risk and cancer treatment with FAC. One thousand eight hundred ninety-eight patients were included (45% male; median age 64 years), with median follow up 24.5 (11.5-48.3 months); 52.7% of patients were at moderate or high baseline CV risk (QRISK3 score >10%) Cardiovascular events occurred in 3.1% (59/1898)-most commonly angina (64.4%, 38/59) and atrial fibrillation (13.6%, 8/59), with 39% events during cycle one of treatment. In univariable analysis, QRISK3 score >20% was significantly associated with incident FAC (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.11-4.93, P = 0.03). On multivariable analysis, beta-blocker use (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.08, P = 0.04) and higher BMI (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.04-5.19, P = 0.04) were independently associated with incident CV events. Thirty-two of the 59 patients with FAC were subsequently rechallenged with fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy, with repeat CV events in 6% (2/32). Incident FAC did not affect overall survival (P = 0.50).
CONCLUSIONS: High BMI and use of beta-blockers are associated with risk of CV events during fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. QRISK3 score may also play a role in identifying patients at high risk of CV events during fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. Re-challenge with further fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy can be considered in patients following CV events during prior treatment.