■在过去的十年里,人道主义紧急情况一直在增加,导致对人道主义健康专业化的更高需求。教育和培训对于使这些工人在危机期间提供有效护理至关重要。了解当前最先进的人道主义健康教育对于未来教育计划的研究和开发至关重要。这篇评论调查了同行评审的文献,以提供对该领域当前思想的见解。
■审查于2023年3月进行,并于2024年5月使用PubMed进行了更新,WebofScience,Scopus,以及自2013年1月以来发表的英语同行评审文章的教育资源信息中心数据库。审查遵循了JoannaBriggsInstitute的范围审查方法,并遵守了系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的荟萃分析扩展(PRISMA-ScR)。使用定性内容分析对数据进行分析,并以叙述性描述性摘要的形式呈现。
■筛选后,32篇文章符合纳入标准。精选文章的主题集中于教育和培训框架,映射,和程序。尽管机会越来越多,大多数教育和培训项目都在全球北部。发现的差距包括缺乏标准化课程或能力框架和评估框架,以指导进一步的标准化培训计划的制定和评估。跨学科和协作伙伴关系,迭代设计,以及混合的教学方法和模式,包括电子学习,促进了成功的培训。然而,后勤和技术限制以及缺乏标准化培训框架是发展的障碍,实施,并评估此类培训计划。
■本综述概述了过去十年来人道主义健康教育的趋势,并确定了未来教育发展和研究的关键领域。调查结果强调,必须调整跨学科和协作伙伴关系,并优先通过区域中心培训当地工作人员,地方领导,和可访问的电子学习,包括电子模拟。审查还强调需要继续研究和评估人道主义健康教育和培训计划,并采用标准化指标来评估培训计划并确定需要改进的领域。这些步骤将有助于确保人道主义卫生专业人员获得足够的培训,以便在危机情况下提供有效的医疗保健。
UNASSIGNED: In the past decade, humanitarian emergencies have been increasing, leading to an higher demand for humanitarian health professionalization. Education and training are critical for preparing these workers to provide effective care during crises. Understanding the current state-of-the-art in humanitarian health education is essential to inform research and development of future educational programs. This review surveys the peer-reviewed literature to provide insights into the current thinking in the field.
UNASSIGNED: A review was conducted in March 2023 and updated in May 2024 using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Education Resources Information Center databases for English-language peer-reviewed articles published since January 2013. The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis and presented as a narrative descriptive summary.
UNASSIGNED: After screening, 32 articles met the inclusion criteria. The themes of the selected articles focus on education and training frameworks, mapping, and programs. Despite the growing opportunities, most education and training programs are based in the Global North. The gaps identified include a lack of standardized curriculum or competency frameworks and evaluation frameworks to guide the development and evaluation of further standardized training programs. Interdisciplinary and collaborative partnerships, iterative design, and mixed teaching methods and modalities, including e-learning, facilitated successful training. However, logistical and technical constraints and the lack of standardized training frameworks were barriers to developing, implementing, and evaluating such training programs.
UNASSIGNED: This review provides an overview of the humanitarian health education trends over the last decade and identifies key areas for future educational development and research. The findings emphasize the importance of adapting interdisciplinary and collaborative partnerships and prioritizing the training of local staff through regional centers, local leadership, and accessible e-learning, including e-simulation. The review also highlights the need for continued research and evaluation of humanitarian health education and training programs with standardized metrics to evaluate training programs and identify areas for improvement. These steps will help ensure that humanitarian health professionals receive adequate training to provide effective healthcare in crisis situations.