Campus lockdown

校园封锁
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:高等教育学生在从青春期到成年期的关键过渡中表现出对环境变化的高度敏感性。2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行给世界各地的大学带来了前所未有的挑战,体现了深刻影响大学生学习成果和心理状况的危机。尽管众所周知,校园封锁引发了生活方式的巨大变化,学习成果,和心理状态,对这些变化之间因果关系的深入了解仍不清楚.
    方法:这里,我们进行了一项横断面调查,旨在评估COVID-19期间校园关闭对生活方式的影响,教育表现,和大学生的焦虑水平。我们调查了3500多所大专,来自30个省的94所学院/大学的本科生和研究生参与者,市政当局,和中国的自治区。我们采用结构方程模型(SEM)来探索生活方式变化之间的关系,教育表现,以及与COVID-19大流行期间校园开放或关闭规定相关的焦虑水平。
    结果:我们的结果发现,睡眠持续时间,参与身体活动,和社会关系对于维持学生的学习成果和心理健康至关重要。向在线学习和校园封锁的转变加剧了压力源,导致焦虑加剧(β=0.066),被打乱的睡眠模式,和增强身体活动(β=0.070)和降低学习效果(β=-0.059)。校园封锁扰乱了睡眠模式,由同学之间的关系退化所介导的效应。尽管如此,最合适的SEM揭示了生活方式改变之间的复杂关系,学习成果,和心理状态响应突然的环境变化(费舍尔C=80.949,P=0.328)。这些结果突出了适应性的关键作用,支持性校园政策量身定制,以满足危机期间和之后学生的不同需求和兴趣(费舍尔的C=59.568,P=0.809)。
    结论:我们的研究提倡一种整体方法,解决学生生活的多方面问题,以培养一个有弹性的学术社区。这种方法有助于更深入地了解后大流行时代突然的环境变化对学生心理健康和学习成绩的影响。
    BACKGROUND: Higher education students exhibit heightened sensitivity to environmental changes as they navigate the critical transition from adolescence to adulthood. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to universities worldwide, exemplifying a crisis that profoundly affects the learning outcomes and psychological status of college students. Although it is known that campus lockdown has triggered dramatic changes in lifestyles, learning outcomes, and psychological statuses, in-depth knowledge of the causal relationships among these changes remains largely unclear.
    METHODS: Here, we conducted a cross-sectional survey designed to assess the impact of campus closure during COVID-19 on lifestyle, educational performance, and anxiety levels among college students. We surveyed over 3,500 junior college, undergraduate and graduate participants from 94 colleges/universities across 30 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions in China.We employed structural equation modeling (SEM) to explore the relationships between changes in lifestyle, educational performance, and levels of anxiety associated with campus open or closure regulations during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    RESULTS: Our results discovered that sleep duration, physical activity involvement, and social connections were crucial for sustaining students\' learning outcomes and mental health. The shift to online learning and campus lockdown exacerbated stressors, contributing to heightened anxiety (β = 0.066), disrupted sleep patterns, and enhanced physical activity (β = 0.070) and reduced learning effect (β = -0.059). Sleep patterns were disrupted by the campus lockdown, an effect mediated by the degradation of relationships among classmates. Nonetheless, the best-fitting SEM uncovered the intricate relationships among lifestyle changes, learning outcomes, and psychological status in response to sudden environmental changes (Fisher\'s C = 80.949, P = 0.328). These results highlight the critical role of adaptable, supportive campus policies tailored to meet the diverse needs and interests of students during and beyond crises (Fisher\'s C = 59.568, P = 0.809).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study advocates for a holistic approach that addresses the multifaceted aspects of student life to cultivate a resilient academic community. This approach contributes to a deeper understanding of the effects of sudden environmental changes on students\' psychological well-being and academic performance in the post-pandemic era.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:焦虑敏感性(AS)是指对焦虑相关的感觉唤醒的恐惧,并已被发现与心理困扰和精神问题的增加有关。虽然焦虑敏感性指数-3(ASI-3)已被证实在评估该结构中是有效的,它是否在大学生中一贯适用仍然难以捉摸。本研究旨在研究因2019年新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行而遭受校园封锁的大学生中ASI-3(C-ASI-3)的中文版心理测量特性和测量不变性。
    方法:本研究共纳入1532名16至25岁的中国大学生(397名,男性25.9%)。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)验证C-ASI-3的因子结构。进行了多组CFA,以分析性别方面的测量不变性。计算McDonald的欧米茄值,以检查量表的可靠性。对于标准,convergent,和不同的有效性,C-ASI-3分量表的平均方差提取(AVE)值,每个因素的AVE平方根与因素间相关性之间的差异,以及C-ASI-3与其他三个量表之间的皮尔逊相关性和偏相关,包括大萧条,焦虑,和应力标度-21(DASS-21),状态特质焦虑量表(STAI),并对COVID-19恐惧量表(FCV-19S)进行评估。
    结果:C-ASI-3呈现三因素尺度结构,拟合指数如下:χ2/df=11.590,CFI=0.938,RMSEA=0.083,SRMR=0.042。性别之间达到了严格的测量不变性。关于收敛有效性,C-ASI-3与DASS-21(r=0.597,p<0.01)和STAI(r=0.504,p<0.01)高度相关。C-ASI-3分量表的所有AVE值均大于0.5。就分歧有效性而言,C-ASI-3与FCV-19S呈中等相关性(r=0.360,p<0.01)。各因子AVE的根的平方高于因子间相关性。三个维度的麦当劳欧米茄值范围为0.898~0.958。
    结论:C-ASI-3在大学生中具有可接受的心理测量特性。不同性别的大学生对量表结构的理解是一致的。
    OBJECTIVE: Anxiety sensitivity (AS) refers to fear of anxiety-related sensory arousal and has been revealed to be associated with increased psychological distress and mental problems. Although Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3) has been confirmed to be effective in evaluating this construct, whether it is consistently applicable in college students is still elusive. The present study aimed to examine the psychometric properties and measurement invariance of Chinese version of ASI-3 (C-ASI-3) among college students experiencing campus lockdown due to novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
    METHODS: A total of 1532 Chinese college students (397, 25.9% males) aged between 16 and 25 were included in this study. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to verify the factor structure of C-ASI-3. Multi-group CFA was conducted for analysis of measurement invariance with regard to gender. McDonald\'s omega values were computed for examination of scale reliability. For criterion, convergent, and divergent validity, average variance extracted (AVE) values for C-ASI-3 subscales, difference between square root of AVE for each factor and inter-factor correlation, as well as pearson correlation and partial correlation between the C-ASI-3 and other three scales, including the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and the Fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19 S) were evaluated.
    RESULTS: The C-ASI-3 presented a three-factor scale structure with fit indices being as follows: χ2/df = 11.590, CFI = 0.938, RMSEA = 0.083, SRMR = 0.042. Strict measurement invariance was reached across gender. Regarding convergent validity, the C-ASI-3 had a high correlation with the DASS-21 (r = 0.597, p < 0.01) and the STAI (r = 0.504, p < 0.01). All AVE values for C-ASI-3 subscales were above 0.5. In terms of divergent validity, the C-ASI-3 had medium correlation with the FCV-19 S (r = 0.360, p < 0.01). Square of root of AVE for each factor was higher that inter-factor correlation. McDonald\'s omega values of the three dimensions ranged from 0.898 ~ 0.958.
    CONCLUSIONS: The C-ASI-3 has acceptable psychometric properties among college students. College students with different gender have consistent understanding on the scale construct.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了预防和控制导致大学生心理问题的COVID-19,发布了校园封锁令。然而,他们在大流行期间的经历也可能导致积极的个人变化,包括创伤后成长(PTG)。当前的研究调查了在COVID-19校园封锁期间,信仰在公正世界中的中介作用以及生活意义在社会支持和PTG中的中介作用。
    对河北省1711名大学生进行了在线调查,中国。根据调查结果,建立了结构方程模型。
    社会支持正预测PTG。此外,对公正世界的信念和生活意义分别在社会支持和PTG之间起中介作用。此外,社会支持还可以通过对公正世界和生活意义的信念的多重系列中介作用来预测PTG。
    这些结果表明了社会支持影响PTG的机制,这提供了有关如何在大流行后时期促进大学生创伤后成长的见解。
    UNASSIGNED: Campus lockdown orders were issued for the purpose of preventing and controlling COVID-19, which resulted in psychological problems among college students. However, the experiences they have during the pandemic may also lead to positive personal changes, including posttraumatic growth (PTG). The current study examined the mediating role of belief in a just world and meaning in life in social support and PTG during the COVID-19 campus lockdown.
    UNASSIGNED: An online survey was conducted on 1711 college students in Hebei Province, China. Based on the survey results, a structural equation model was established.
    UNASSIGNED: Social support positively predicted PTG. Furthermore, belief in a just world and meaning in life played a mediating role between social support and PTG respectively. Besides, social support could also predict PTG through the multiple serial mediating effect of belief in a just world and meaning in life.
    UNASSIGNED: These results indicated mechanisms by which social support influenced PTG, and this provided insights into how to promote post-traumatic growth among university students in the post-pandemic period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的3年中,隔离一直是控制COVID-19传播的有效方法。然而,生活方式的改变可能会对心理健康产生负面影响。探讨积极应对对COVID-19校园封锁期间大学生心理健康的影响,这项研究进行了一项在线横断面调查.
    2022年10月,在校园长期封锁近3年之后,山东省某高校313名大学生,中国,被邀请完成在线问卷。问卷包括一份自我管理的一般情况问卷,简单应对样式比例,和医院抑郁和焦虑量表。
    (1)方差分析显示,在COVID-19校园封锁期间,应对方式对抑郁有显著的主要影响[F(4,300)=2.446,p=0.047]。事后测试表明,在空闲时间从事学习(p=0.012)或运动(p=0.027)的大学生的抑郁得分明显低于使用互联网的大学生。(2)独立样本t检验显示,大学生在抑郁(t=6.891,p<0.001)和焦虑(t=7.745,p<0.001)方面的积极和消极应对方式存在显著差异。(3)Pearson相关分析显示,积极应对方式与焦虑呈负相关(r=-0.378,p<0.001)。积极应对方式与抑郁之间的关系(r=0.427,p<0.001)。消极应对方式与焦虑呈正相关(r=0.155,p=0.007)。在消极应对方式和抑郁之间(r=0.190,p<0.001)。
    研究表明,培养学生的积极应对可以缓解危机期间的心理健康问题,为流行病期间的大学心理健康计划提供蓝图。
    Isolation has been an effective method to control the spread of COVID-19 over the past 3 years. However, lifestyle changes may have a negative impact on mental health. To examine the effects of positive coping on mental health in college students during the COVID-19 campus lockdown, this study conducted an online cross-sectional survey.
    In October 2022, following a prolonged campus lockdown of nearly 3 years, 313 university students from a university in Shandong Province, China, were invited to complete an online questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised a self-administered general situation questionnaire, the Simple Coping Style Scale, and the Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale.
    (1) The analysis of variance revealed a significant main effect of coping Style on depression [F(4,300) = 2.446, p = 0.047] during the COVID-19 campus lockdown. A post-hoc test indicated that college students who engaged in study (p = 0.012) or sports (p = 0.027) during their free time had significantly lower depression scores than those who used the Internet. (2) Independent sample t-tests showed significant differences in positive and negative coping styles among college students in terms of depression (t = 6.891, p < 0.001) and anxiety scores (t = 7.745, p < 0.001). (3) Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated a negative correlation between positive coping style and anxiety (r = -0.378, p < 0.001), and between positive coping style and depression (r = 0.427, p < 0.001). Positive correlations were also found between the negative coping style and anxiety (r = 0.155, p = 0.007), and between the negative coping style and depression (r = 0.190, p < 0.001).
    The study suggested that fostering positive coping in students can mitigate mental health issues during crises, providing a blueprint for university mental health initiatives during epidemics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于COVID-19大流行而导致的校园封锁对大学生的心理健康产生了不利影响。然而,对校园封锁反应的异质性仍然鲜为人知。我们收集了上海大学生心理健康的三波前瞻性数据,中国,2022年:(I)大流行前的2月;(Ii)4月在COVID-19校园初步封锁;(Iii)5月在全市范围内封锁。总的来说,205名大学生完成了社会人口统计问卷,一般健康问卷-12项目(GHQ-12),和大萧条,焦虑和压力量表-21项(DASS-21)。广义估计方程用于检查心理健康和抑郁症状的纵向变化,焦虑,和压力。构建潜在类别混合模型(LCMM)以识别不同的轨迹。使用多项回归模型来识别与状态变化模式相关的因素。在大流行前和封锁T1和T2时,平均GHQ-12得分分别为8.49、9.66和11.26(p<0.001)。抑郁症的平均得分,焦虑,应力分别为(5.96、10.36和8.06,p<0.001),(7.13、6.67和7.16,p=0.243),和(9.83、7.28和11.43,p<0.001),分别。有临床症状的参与者人数的变化趋势与平均得分一致。LCMM拟合了三个不同的轨迹类别,分别,GHQ-12,抑郁和焦虑症状,和四类压力症状。具有公平或不良同伴关系的参与者更有可能属于有关抑郁症的脆弱轨迹,焦虑,和压力症状。这项研究证明了大学生在应对大流行校园封锁时的心理健康异质性,并强调了确定弱势群体以在未来大流行中提供有针对性支持的必要性。
    The campus lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected mental health among university students. However, the heterogeneity in responses to campus lockdown is still poorly known. We collected three-wave prospective data on university students\' mental health in Shanghai, China, in 2022: (i) in February before the pandemic; (ii) in April at the initial COVID-19 campus lockdown; and (iii) in May amidst the citywide lockdown. Overall, 205 university students completed sociodemographic questionnaires, the General Health Questionnaire-12 items (GHQ-12), and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 items (DASS-21). Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the longitudinal changes in mental health and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress. Latent class mixed models (LCMM) were constructed to identify distinct trajectories. Multinomial regression models were used to identify factors associated with status variation patterns. Mean GHQ-12 scores were 8.49, 9.66, and 11.26 at pre-pandemic and lockdown T1 and T2, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean scores for depression, anxiety, and stress were (5.96, 10.36, and 8.06, p < 0.001), (7.13, 6.67, and 7.16, p = 0.243), and (9.83, 7.28, and 11.43, p < 0.001), respectively. Changing trends of numbers of participants with clinical symptoms were consistent with those of mean scores. LCMM fitted three distinct trajectory classes, respectively, for GHQ-12, depression and anxiety symptoms, and four classes for stress symptoms. Participants with fair or poor peer relationships were more likely to belong to vulnerable trajectories concerning depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. This study proves heterogeneity in mental health of university students in response to pandemic campus lockdown and highlights the necessity for identifying vulnerable groups to provide targeted support in future pandemics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于流行病的持续传播,一些高校已经在中国实施了校园封锁管理政策。在校园封锁的背景下,本研究旨在探讨焦虑是否介导了人际关系敏感和抑郁之间的关系,并研究心理资本是否调节了中介模型的间接或直接效应。
    方法:2022年4月10日至19日在中国招募了12945名本科生。这些参与者被要求完成测量人际敏感性的在线问卷,焦虑,心理资本,和抑郁症。通过使用SPSS25.0的过程宏检查了一个适度的中介模型,其中焦虑是一个中介变量,心理资本是一个调节变量。
    结果:人际关系敏感与中国大学生的抑郁情绪呈正相关(r=0.47,P<0.001)。焦虑部分介导了人际关系敏感和抑郁之间的关联(间接效应=2.31,95CI[2.18,2.44],占总效应的70%)。此外,人际关系敏感和心理资本对焦虑的交互作用(β=-0.04,t=-17.36,P<0.001),焦虑和心理资本对抑郁的交互作用(β=0.002,t=1.99,P<0.05)有统计学意义。
    结论:本研究解释了焦虑的中介作用和心理资本在人际关系敏感与抑郁之间的调节作用。研究结果表明,在校园封锁期间,严格监测焦虑和提升心理资本可能会降低中国大学生的抑郁风险。
    BACKGROUND: Due to the continuous spread of the epidemic, some colleges and universities have implemented a campus lockdown management policy in China. In the context of the campus lockdown, this study aimed to explore whether anxiety mediated the association between interpersonal sensitivity and depression, and investigate whether psychological capital moderated the indirect or direct effect of mediation model.
    METHODS: A total of 12945 undergrad students were recruited in China from April 10 to 19, 2022. These participants were asked to complete the online questionnaires measuring interpersonal sensitivity, anxiety, psychological capital, and depression. A moderated mediation model was examined by using PROCESS macro for SPSS 25.0, in which anxiety was a mediating variable, and psychological capital was a moderating variable.
    RESULTS: Interpersonal sensitivity was positively associated with depression among Chinese college students (r = 0.47, P < 0.001). Anxiety partially mediated the association between interpersonal sensitivity and depression (indirect effect = 2.31, 95%CI [2.18, 2.44], accounting for 70% of the total effect). Moreover, the interaction effect of interpersonal sensitivity and psychological capital on anxiety (β = -0.04, t = -17.36, P < 0.001) and the interaction effect of anxiety and psychological capital on depression (β = 0.002, t = 1.99, P < 0.05) were statistically significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: The current study explained the mediation role of anxiety and the moderation role of psychological capital in the relation between interpersonal sensitivity and depression. The findings suggested that strict monitoring anxiety and promoting psychological capital may decrease the risk of depression among Chinese college students during the campus lockdown.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    调查与2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行相关的校园生活条件变化对医学院学生心理健康状况的影响,探讨情绪调节策略的中介作用,为促进医学生心理健康提供有效建议。
    一份自我报告问卷,情绪调节问卷(ERQ),和公共卫生突发事件心理问卷(PQEEPH)被用来采访998名在COVID-19大流行期间经历过校园封锁的医学院学生。
    平均总PQEEPH评分为3.66±3.06。日常生活不便程度以及作为情绪调节策略的常规和表达抑制的变化与所有PQEEPH维度均呈显着正相关。认知重估与抑郁显著负相关,神经症,强迫性焦虑,和疑病(ps<0.05)。认知重新评价和表达抑制在生活不便程度与心理健康之间以及在常规变化程度与心理健康之间具有连锁中介作用(F=32.883,41.051,ps<0.05)。
    校园封锁管理显著影响医学院学生的心理健康。广泛使用认知重估和表达抑制可以在一定程度上减少校园封锁期间学生的不良心理反应。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the effect of changes in campus living conditions related to the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on medical school students\' mental health status, to explore the mediating role of emotion regulation strategies, and to provide effective suggestions for promoting medical school students\' mental health.
    UNASSIGNED: A self-report questionnaire, an emotion regulation questionnaire (ERQ), and psychological questionnaires for emergent events of public health (PQEEPH) were used to interview 998 medical school students who experienced campus lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean total PQEEPH score was 3.66 ± 3.06. The degrees of inconvenience in daily life and change in routine and expression suppression as an emotion regulation strategy were significantly positively correlated with all PQEEPH dimensions. Cognitive reappraisal was significantly negatively associated with depression, neurosis, obsessive-compulsive anxiety, and hypochondriasis (ps < 0.05). Cognitive reappraisal and expression suppression demonstrated a chain mediating role between the degree of inconvenience in life and mental health and between the degree of change in routine and mental health (F = 32.883, 41.051, ps < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Campus lockdown management significantly impacts medical school students\' mental health. Extensive use of cognitive reappraisal and expression suppression can reduce students\' adverse psychological reactions during campus lockdowns to an extent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    调查人际关系敏感的患病率,焦虑,在COVID-19校园封锁期间,中国大规模大学生的抑郁症状和相关危险因素。该调查于2022年4月在中国东部一所大学的本科生中进行。采用卡方检验比较不同变量组,对与人际敏感相关的危险因素进行多变量分析,焦虑,抑郁症状。共纳入大学生12922人,平均年龄(20.96±1.66)岁。人际关系敏感的普遍性,这项研究中的焦虑和抑郁症状分别为58.1、22.7和46.8%,分别。男性(OR=1.16,p<0.001),22-23岁(OR=1.40,p<0.001),新生(OR=1.35,p=0.002),非独生子女(OR=1.15,p<0.001)与人际敏感性呈正相关。男性(OR=1.20,p<0.001),大二(OR=1.27,p=0.020)和大四(OR=1.20,p=0.027)与焦虑症状呈正相关。与女学生相比,男学生(OR=0.89,p<0.001)不太可能出现抑郁症状。22-23岁(OR=1.37,p<0.001),大二学生(OR=1.26,p=0.009)和非独生子女(OR=1.11,p=0.009)与抑郁症状呈正相关。此外,18-21岁的大学生,学习状态,不吃早餐,室友关系和睡眠质量与人际关系敏感有关,焦虑和抑郁症状(均p<0.05)。这项研究的结果表明,人际关系敏感的患病率很高,COVID-19校园封锁期间中国大学生的焦虑和抑郁症状。年龄更小,低等级,宿舍关系不好,消极的学习状态,不吃早餐和睡眠质量差是大学生心理健康的危险因素,在校园封锁期间,学校相关部门应该关注这一点。
    To investigate the prevalence of interpersonal sensitivity, anxiety, depression symptoms and associated risk factors among a large-scale sample of college students in China during the COVID-19 campus lockdown. The survey was conducted among undergraduate students at a university in eastern part of China in April 2022. The Chi-square test was used to compare the different variable groups and multivariable analysis was performed for the risk factors associated with interpersonal sensitivity, anxiety, and depression symptoms. A total of 12,922 college students were included, with an average age of (20.96 ± 1.66) years. The prevalence of interpersonal sensitivity, anxiety and depression symptoms in this study was 58.1, 22.7, and 46.8%, respectively. Male (OR = 1.16, p < 0.001), 22-23 years (OR = 1.40, p < 0.001), freshman (OR = 1.35, p = 0.002), and non-only child (OR = 1.15, p < 0.001) were positively associated with interpersonal sensitivity. Male (OR = 1.20, p < 0.001), sophomores (OR = 1.27, p = 0.020) and seniors (OR = 1.20, p = 0.027) were positively associated with anxiety symptoms. Compared with female students, male students (OR = 0.89, p < 0.001) were less likely to have depression symptoms. 22-23 years (OR = 1.37, p < 0.001), sophomores (OR = 1.26, p = 0.009) and non-only child (OR = 1.11, p = 0.009) were positively associated with depression symptoms. In addition, college students aged 18-21 years, learning status, skipping breakfast, roommate relationship and sleep quality were associated with interpersonal sensitivity, anxiety and depression symptoms (all p < 0.05). The findings of this study suggest a high prevalence of interpersonal sensitivity, anxiety and depression symptoms among Chinese college students during the COVID-19 campus lockdown. Younger ages, low grades, poor dormitory relationship, negative learning status, skipping breakfast and poor sleep quality were the risk factors for college students\' mental health, which should be concerned by the relevant departments of school during the campus lockdown.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经授权:COVID-19大流行极大地影响了人们的心理健康。该时期社会支持与自杀意念之间的直接和间接途径尚不清楚。这项研究探讨了在COVID-19校园封锁期间,大学生通过弹性和抑郁症状从社会支持到自杀意念的途径。
    未经批准:在COVID-19校园封锁的两周内,中国东部某大学共有12945名本科生完成了包括社会人口学特征在内的问卷,自杀意念,社会支持,弹性,和抑郁症状。使用结构方程模型(SEM)方法通过弹性和抑郁症状的介体分析了从社会支持到自杀意念的直接和间接途径。
    未经批准:在本研究中纳入的12,917名本科生中,7.4%(n=955)的人报告说他们有时有自杀意念,0.8%(n=109)报告他们经常有自杀意念,0.9%(n=122)报告他们总是有自杀意念,13.2%(n=1704)报告他们有抑郁症状。社会支持发挥了显著的直接作用(β=-0.058),间接(β=-0.225),和对自杀意念的总效应(β=-0.283);总效应的20.5%是直接效应,79.5%为间接。社会支持通过韧性预测自杀意念(β=-0.038),和抑郁症状(β=-0.087),解释13.4%,和总效果的30.7%,分别。社会支持通过弹性和抑郁症状的序贯调解预测自杀意念(β=-0.099),解释总效应的35.0%。
    UNASSIGNED:这是第一项研究,为中国大学生在COVID-19校园封锁期间从社会支持到自杀意念的途径提供证据。从社会支持到自杀意念的直接和间接途径均被确定为减少自杀意念的干预目标。
    UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly affected people\'s mental health. The direct and indirect pathways between social support and suicidal ideation in the period are still unclear. This study explores the pathways from social support to suicidal ideation through resilience and depressive symptoms among undergraduates during the COVID-19 campus lockdown.
    UNASSIGNED: During two weeks of the COVID-19 campus lockdown, a total of 12,945 undergraduates at a university in eastern China completed the questionnaire including sociodemographic characteristics, suicidal ideation, social support, resilience, and depressive symptoms. A structural equation modeling (SEM) approach was used to analyze the direct and indirect pathways from social support to suicidal ideation via the mediators of resilience and depressive symptoms.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 12,917 undergraduates included in this study, 7.4% (n = 955) reported they sometimes had suicidal ideation, 0.8% (n = 109) reported they often had suicidal ideation, 0.9% (n = 122) reported they always had suicidal ideation, and 13.2% (n = 1704) reported they had depressive symptoms. Social support exerted significant direct (β = -0.058), indirect (β = -0.225), and total (β = -0.283) effects on suicidal ideation; 20.5% of the total effect was direct, and 79.5% was indirect. Social support predicted suicidal ideation through resilience (β = -0.038), and depressive symptoms (β = -0.087), explaining 13.4%, and 30.7% of the total effect, respectively. Social support predicted suicidal ideation through the sequential mediation of resilience and depressive symptoms (β = -0.099), explaining 35.0% of the total effect.
    UNASSIGNED: This is the first study to provide the evidence of pathways from social support to suicidal ideation through resilience and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 campus lockdown among undergraduates in China. Both direct and indirect pathways from social support to suicidal ideation were identified as intervention targets to reduce suicidal ideation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号