CRRT

CRRT
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患者静脉动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)的肾脏替代疗法(RRT)的最佳方式仍不清楚。这项研究旨在比较VA-ECMO患者的连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)和腹膜透析(PD)的结果。
    方法:此单中心回顾性研究包括发生AKI并随后需要CRRT或PD的VA-ECMO患者。患者人口统计数据,合并症,临床特征,RRT模态,并收集结果。主要结果是住院死亡率,次要结果包括住院时间,RRT持续时间,以及与RRT相关的并发症。
    结果:共纳入43例患者(72.1%为男性,平均年龄58.2±15.7岁)。其中,在ECMO治疗期间,21人接受CRRT,22人接受PD。CRRT组和PD组之间的住院死亡率没有显着差异(80.9%vs90.9%,p=0.35)。然而,PD与导管相关并发症发生率较高相关,包括错位(31.8%对4.7%,p=0.046),感染(22.7%vs4.7%,p=0.19),和出血(18.2%vs9.5%,p=0.66),分别。
    结论:在接受VA-ECMO支持的RRT的患者中,我们的研究显示,CRRT和PD的住院死亡率相当,尽管PD与导管相关并发症的发生率较高相关。
    BACKGROUND: The optimal modality for renal replacement therapy (RRT) in patients venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) remains unclear. This study aimed to compare outcomes between continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in VA-ECMO patients.
    METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included VA-ECMO patients who developed AKI and subsequently required CRRT or PD. Data on patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, RRT modality, and outcomes were collected. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, with secondary outcomes including length of stays, RRT durations, and complications associated with RRT.
    RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were included (72.1% male, mean age 58.2 ± 15.7 years). Of these, 21 received CRRT and 22 received PD during ECMO therapy. In-hospital mortality rates did not significantly differ between CRRT and PD groups (80.9% vs 90.9%, p = 0.35). However, PD was associated with a higher incidence of catheter-related complications, including malposition (31.8% vs 4.7%, p = 0.046), infection (22.7% vs 4.7%, p = 0.19), and bleeding (18.2% vs 9.5%, p = 0.66), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Among patients receiving VA-ECMO-supported RRT, our study revealed comparable in-hospital mortality rates between CRRT and PD, although PD was associated with a higher incidence of catheter-related complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:急性肝衰竭(ALF)是一种医疗紧急情况,可能需要肝移植(LT)作为确定性治疗。病因因地理位置而异,在印度主要是病毒。我们的目标是评估光谱,干预措施的影响(血浆置换[PLEx],连续肾脏替代疗法[CRRT])和最近印度ALF的结果。
    方法:一项跨四个主要三级护理中心的多中心回顾性研究。
    结果:多达183例ALF患者(中位年龄,23岁;女性,43.1%;终末期肝病模型[MELD],32.7)从2021年1月到2023年12月被包括在内。19%的患者感染,40.4%的患者在入院时符合国王学院标准(KCC)。ALF的最常见原因是甲型肝炎病毒(HAV)(44.2%),其次是杀鼠剂中毒(10.3%)。大约35%的患者接受PLEx或CRRT。7、14和21天无移植存活概率为65.5%,60.1%,57.3%,分别。只有3.8%的患者接受了肝移植。关于多变量Cox回归分析,血红蛋白(HR,0.74[0.63-0.87]),乳酸(HR,1.14[1.03-1.26]),晚期肝性脑病(HE)(HR,4.87[1.89-12.5])并履行KCC[人力资源,入院时10.04[4.57-22.06])是死亡率的独立预测因子。包括有或没有血红蛋白的KCC+乳酸+HE≥3的模型具有0.81-0.84的AUROC来预测死亡率。在那些接受PLEx的人中,高级HE(HR,4.13[1.75-9.7]),降钙素原(HR,1.18[1.07-1.30])和KCC(HR,4.6[1.6-13.1),而对于那些接受CRRT的人来说,乳酸(HR,1.37[1.22-1.54])和KCC(HR,6.4[2.5-15.8])独立预测死亡率。
    结论:目前,甲型肝炎病毒是印度ALF的最常见原因,强调普遍疫苗接种计划的必要性。三级护理中心的自发生存率为57%。LT率很低。
    OBJECTIVE: Acute liver failure (ALF) is a medical emergency and liver transplantation (LT) may be required as definitive therapy. The etiology varies across geographical locations and is mostly viral dominant in India. We aimed at evaluating the spectrum, impact of interventions (plasma exchange [PLEx], continuous renal replacement therapy [CRRT]) and outcomes of ALF in India in recent times.
    METHODS: A multicentre retrospective study across four major tertiary care centres.
    RESULTS: As many as 183 ALF patients (median age, 23 years; females, 43.1%; model for end-stage liver disease [MELD], 32.7) from January 2021 to December 2023 were included. Nineteen per cent had infection and 40.4% of patients satisfied King\'s College criteria (KCC) at admission. Most common cause for ALF was hepatitis A virus (HAV) (44.2%) followed by rodenticide poisoning (10.3%). Approximately 35% of patients each received either PLEx or CRRT. The 7, 14 and 21-day transplant-free survival probability was 65.5%, 60.1%, and 57.3%, respectively. Only 3.8% of patients underwent liver transplantation. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, hemoglobin (HR, 0.74 [0.63-0.87]), lactate (HR, 1.14 [1.03-1.26]), advanced hepatic encephalopathy (HE) (HR, 4.87 [1.89-12.5]) and fulfilling KCC [HR, 10.04 [4.57-22.06]) at admission were the independent predictors of mortality. A model including KCC + lactate + HE ≥ 3 with or without hemoglobin had an AUROC of 0.81-0.84 to predict mortality. In those who underwent PLEx, advanced HE (HR, 4.13 [1.75-9.7]), procalcitonin (HR, 1.18 [1.07-1.30]) and KCC (HR, 4.6 [1.6-13.1), while for those who received CRRT, lactate (HR, 1.37 [1.22-1.54]) and KCC (HR, 6.4 [2.5-15.8]) independently predicted mortality.
    CONCLUSIONS: Hepatitis A virus is currently the most common cause for ALF in India, emphasizing the need for universal vaccination programmes. Spontaneous survival in tertiary care centres is 57%. LT rates were low.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性肝衰竭(ALF)和慢性急性肝(ACLF)是肝衰竭的不同表型,因此需要进行比较和对比以进行适当的管理。这些接受肝移植(LT)的患者的预后有了显着改善。ALF和ACLF术后1年生存率介于90-95%和80-90%之间,在ALF和ACLF中都描述了无效标准,其中器官衰竭定义了存活。血浆置换和连续肾脏替代疗法可以作为桥接疗法。识别LT的无效性与LT在ALF和ACLF患者中的效用一样必要。在两种情况下,再生疗法如粒细胞集落刺激因子在ACLF和肝细胞和异种移植中的作用仍不确定。通过增加亚洲国家的尸体移植来增加捐助者的措施,在西方国家的生活捐赠,辅助肝移植和ABO不相容肝移植是提高这些患者生存率的必要条件.在这次审查中,我们讨论了ALF和ACLF的临床特征以及LT治疗时机和结果的异同,简要强调桥接疗法的作用,并概述ALF和ACLF管理的最新进展。
    Acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver (ACLF) are distinct phenotypes of liver failure and thus need to be compared and contrasted for appropriate management. There has been a significant improvement in the outcomes of these patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). Survival post-LT for ALF and ACLF ranges between 90-95% and 80-90% at 1 year, futility criteria have been described in both ALF and ACLF where organ failures define survival. Plasma exchange and continuous renal replacement therapy may serve as bridging therapies. Identifying the futility of LT is as necessary as the utility of LT in patients with ALF and ACLF. The role of regenerative therapies such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in ACLF and hepatocyte and Xenotransplantation in both conditions remains uncertain. Measures to increase the donor pool through increasing cadaveric transplants in Asian countries, living donations in Western countries, auxiliary liver transplants and ABO-incompatible liver transplants are necessary to improve the survival of these patients. In this review, we discuss the similarities and differences in clinical characteristics and the timing and outcomes of LT for ALF and ACLF, briefly highlighting the role of bridging therapies and providing an overview of recent advances in the management of ALF and ACLF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在接受肾脏替代疗法(RRT)的患者中使用厄他培南的临床疗效和安全性没有得到很好的证明。因此,我们旨在研究厄他培南在接受RRT的肠杆菌继发脓毒症患者中的安全性和有效性.
    2015年5月至2021年12月在我院对符合纳入标准的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。主要终点是30天死亡率。次要终点包括临床治愈,微生物治疗,复发率,和癫痫发作的发生率。
    在研究期间,158例患者符合纳入标准。其中,86人是男性(54.4%),平均年龄为66.4±13.8岁,平均体重为77±22.4kg。最常见的诊断为菌血症48例(30.4%),其次是39名(24.7%)受试者的尿路感染,35例(22.2%)患者出现肺炎。最分离的病原体是大肠杆菌,其次是克雷伯菌属。接受间歇性血液透析(IHD)的患者的中位厄他培南剂量为每天静脉内(IV)0.5g,接受连续静脉-静脉血液滤过(CVVH)的患者为每天IV1g。30天死亡率为24%,临床治愈率为89.2%,微生物治愈率为82%,30天复发率为41.1%,癫痫发作的发生率为2.5%。多因素logistic回归分析显示年龄(OR1.04[95%CI:1.003-1.075]),在治疗开始时危重(OR2.9[95%CI:1.1-7.5]),和除克雷伯菌属和大肠埃希菌以外的肠杆菌(OR3.8[95%CI:1.1-12.5])是与该人群死亡率相关的显著独立危险因素.厄他培南剂量与死亡率无关。
    我们的研究结果表明,在接受IHD和CVVH的患者中,常用剂量的厄他培南在临床上是有效的,但可能会带来更高的癫痫发作风险。需要进行全面的药代动力学研究,以确定该人群最有效和安全的剂量。
    UNASSIGNED: The clinical efficacy and safety of ertapenem use in patients undergoing renal replacement therapies (RRT) are not well-documented. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of ertapenem in patients with sepsis secondary to Enterobacterales who are undergoing RRT.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who met the inclusion criteria at our hospital between May 2015 and December 2021. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included clinical cure, microbiologic cure, recurrence rate, and incidence of seizures.
    UNASSIGNED: During the study period, 158 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 86 were male (54.4%), the mean age was 66.4 ± 13.8 years, and the mean weight was 77 ± 22.4 kg. The most common diagnosis was bacteremia in 48 (30.4%) subjects, followed by urinary tract infection in 39 (24.7%) subjects, and pneumonia in 35 (22.2%) patients. The most isolated pathogens were Escherichia coli, followed by Klebsiella species. The median ertapenem dose was 0.5 g intravenously (IV) daily in those who received intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and 1 g IV daily for those who received continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH). The 30-day mortality rate was 24%, the clinical cure rate was 89.2%, the microbiologic cure rate was 82%, the 30-day recurrence rate was 41.1%, and the incidence of seizures was 2.5%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that age (OR 1.04 [95% CI: 1.003-1.075]), being critically ill at therapy initiation (OR 2.9 [95% CI: 1.1-7.5]), and Enterobacterales other than Klebsiella species and Escherichia coli (OR 3.8 [95% CI: 1.1-12.5]) were significant independent risk factors associated with mortality in this population. Ertapenem dose was not associated with mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings suggest that the commonly used doses of ertapenem in patients undergoing IHD and CVVH are clinically effective but may pose a higher risk of seizures. A comprehensive pharmacokinetic study is needed to determine the most effective and safe dose for this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    二甲双胍相关性乳酸性酸中毒(MALA)是一种威胁生命的疾病,可能是双胍的副作用。根据严重程度,这种情况的死亡率约为55%。典型的症状包括腹痛,恶心,呕吐,腹泻,但也可能表现为严重的症状,如失明,分布冲击,和肾功能衰竭需要ICU级护理。我们介绍了一个70多岁的女性,她到达急诊科时精神状态改变,新发失明,后来诊断为严重酸中毒(pH6.607)。她因血流动力学不稳定而插管,并开始连续肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)以解决她的酸碱状况。发现她的二甲双胍浓度异常高,为34微克/毫升,显着超过1-2mcg/ml的正常范围。幸运的是,患者幸存下来,随后被转移到医疗楼层,情况稳定。医师应进行药物审查,并在进行鉴别诊断时将“MALA”视为严重酸中毒的潜在病因。
    Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) is a life-threatening condition that may occur as a side effect of biguanides. This condition has a mortality rate of approximately 55 % depending on the severity. Typical symptoms include abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, but may also manifest with severe symptoms such as blindness, distributive shock, and renal failure requiring ICU level care. We present the case of a female in her early 70s who arrived at the emergency department with altered mental status and new-onset blindness, later diagnosed with severe acidosis (pH 6.607). She was intubated for hemodynamic instability and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was started to address her acid-base status. Her metformin concentration was found to be exceptionally high at 34 mcg/ml, significantly surpassing the normal range of 1-2 mcg/ml. Fortunately, the patient survived and was subsequently transferred to the medical floors in stable condition. Physicians should perform medication review and consider \"MALA\" as a potential etiology of severe acidosis when forming a differential diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:伏立康唑在重症监护病房(ICU)患者中的药代动力学(PK)特征与其他患者不同。我们旨在开发一种群体药代动力学(PopPK)模型,以评估使用体外膜氧合(ECMO)和连续肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)以及各种生物协变量对伏立康唑PK谱的影响。
    方法:使用具有两室模型的非线性混合效应建模方法(NONMEM)进行PK参数的建模分析。进行蒙特卡罗模拟(MCS)以观察在不同剂量方案下接受或不接受CRRT时达到目标(PTA)的概率,快速C反应蛋白(qCRP)的不同分层,和不同的最小抑制浓度(MIC)范围。
    结果:本研究共纳入408例危重患者,其中746例伏立康唑浓度-时间数据点。具有qCRP的两室种群PK模型,CRRT,肌酐清除率(CLCR),血小板(PLT),和凝血酶原时间(PT)作为固定效应是使用NONMEM开发的。
    结论:我们发现qCRP,CRRT,CLCR,PLT,PT影响伏立康唑清除率。最常用的200mgq12h的临床方案足以用于最常见的敏感病原体(MIC≤0.25mg/L),无论是否进行CRRT和qCRP水平。当MIC为0.5mg/L时,仅当qCRP<40mg/L并进行CRRT时,200mgq12h才不足。当MIC≥2mg/L时,300mgq12h的剂量不能达到≥90%PTA,需要评估更高的剂量。
    OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of voriconazole in intensive care unit (ICU) patients differ from that in other patients. We aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model to evaluate the effects of using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and those of various biological covariates on the voriconazole PK profile.
    METHODS: Modeling analyses of the PK parameters were conducted using the nonlinear mixed-effects modeling method (NONMEM) with a two-compartment model. Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) were performed to observe the probability of target attainment (PTA) when receiving CRRT or not under different dosage regimens, different stratifications of quick C-reactive protein (qCRP), and different minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranges.
    RESULTS: A total of 408 critically ill patients with 746 voriconazole concentration-time data points were included in this study. A two-compartment population PK model with qCRP, CRRT, creatinine clearance rate (CLCR), platelets (PLT), and prothrombin time (PT) as fixed effects was developed using the NONMEM.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found that qCRP, CRRT, CLCR, PLT, and PT affected the voriconazole clearance. The most commonly used clinical regimen of 200 mg q12h was sufficient for the most common sensitive pathogens (MIC ≤ 0.25 mg/L), regardless of whether CRRT was performed and the level of qCRP. When the MIC was 0.5 mg/L, 200 mg q12h was insufficient only when the qCRP was <40 mg/L and CRRT was performed. When the MIC was ≥2 mg/L, a dose of 300 mg q12h could not achieve ≥ 90% PTA, necessitating the evaluation of a higher dose.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:初步研究表明,中度ARDS和急性肾衰竭可能受益于体外CO2去除(ECCO2R)和CRRT。然而,证据有限,可能需要探索这种联合治疗的可能性.本研究的目的是评估与没有COVID-19的历史组相比,在患有COVID-19的中度ARDS的患者中,应用低流量ECCO2-R加CRRT是否获得了保护性驱动压力。
    方法:进行了一项病例对照研究,比较了一组连续出现AKI并受COVID-19影响的中度ARDS患者,这些患者需要低流量ECCO2-R加CRRT才能实现超保护性通气策略,没有COVID-19的历史组的临床表现相匹配,并接受了相同的超保护性治疗。将VT设定为6mL/kg预测体重,然后评估ECCO2R以促进超保护性低VT通气,以保持安全的Pplat和低驱动压力。
    结果:ECCO2R+CRRT将14例ARDS患者的驱动压力从17(14-18)降低到11.5(10-15)cmH2O(p<0.0004),1小时后将VT从6.7ml/kgPBW(6.1-6.9)降低到5.1(4.2-5.6)(p<0.0001)。在患有COVID-19的ARDS患者中,从基线18(14-24)cmH2O到11(10-15)cmH2O(p<0.004),驱动压力降低更有效,与对照组相比,从15(13-17)到12(10-16)cmH2O(p<0.03),一小时后。ECCO2R+CRRT对两组28天死亡率无影响,与对照组相比,我们观察到中度ARDS患者的机械通气持续时间较短(19{7-29}vs24{22-38}天;p=0.24)和ICU住院时间较短(19{7-29}vs24{22-78}天;p=0.25)。
    结论:在有或没有COVID-19疾病的中度ARDS患者中,ECCO2R+CRRT可能是有效的支持治疗,以达到驱动压力的保护值,除非出现严重的氧合缺陷,需要开始ECMO治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Preliminary studies suggest that moderate ARDS and acute renal failure might benefit from extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) coupled with CRRT. However, evidence is limited and potential for this coupled treatment may need to be explored. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a protective driving pressure was obtained applying low-flow ECCO2-R plus CRRT in patients affected by moderate ARDS with COVID-19 compared to an historical group without COVID-19.
    METHODS: A case-control study has been conducted comparing a group of consecutive moderate ARDS patients presenting AKI and affected by COVID-19, who needed low-flow ECCO2-R plus CRRT to achieve an ultra-protective ventilatory strategy, with historical group without COVID-19 that matched for clinical presentation and underwent the same ultra-protective treatment. VT was set at 6 mL/kg predicted body weight then ECCO2R was assessed to facilitate ultra-protective low VT ventilation to preserve safe Pplat and low driving pressure.
    RESULTS: ECCO2R+CRRT reduced the driving pressure from 17 (14-18) to 11.5 (10-15) cmH2O (p<0.0004) in the fourteen ARDS patients by decreasing VT from 6.7 ml/kg PBW (6.1-6.9) to 5.1 (4.2-5.6) after 1 hour (p <0.0001). In the ARDS patients with COVID-19, the driving pressure reduction was more effective from baseline 18 (14-24) cmH2O to 11 (10-15) cmH2O (p<0.004), compared to the control group from 15 (13-17) to 12(10-16) cmH2O (p< 0.03), after one hour. ECCO2R+CRRT did not affected 28 days mortality in the two groups, while we observed a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (19 {7-29} vs 24 {22-38} days; p=0.24) and ICU length of stay (19 {7-29} vs 24 {22-78} days; p=0.25) in moderate ARDS patients with COVID-19 compared to control group.
    CONCLUSIONS: In moderate ARDS patients with or without COVID-19 disease, ECCO2R+CRRT may be and effective supportive treatment to reach protective values of driving pressure unless severe oxygenation defects arise requiring ECMO therapy initiation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    CRRT机器警报的准确解释在重症监护环境中至关重要。ChatGPT,凭借其先进的自然语言处理能力,已经成为一种工具,它在协助医疗保健信息的能力方面正在发展和进步。本研究旨在评估ChatGPT-3.5和ChatGPT-4模型在解决与CRRT警报故障排除相关的查询时的准确性。这项研究包括两轮ChatGPT-3.5和ChatGPT-4响应,以解决50个CRRT机器警报问题,这些问题是由两名重症监护肾脏病学家精心选择的。通过将模型响应与重症监护肾脏病学家提供的预定答案键进行比较来确定准确性。通过比较两轮的结果来确定一致性。ChatGPT-3.5的准确率分别为86%和84%,而ChatGPT-4在第一轮和第二轮的准确率分别为90%和94%,分别。ChatGPT-3.5的第一轮和第二轮之间的一致性为84%,Kappa统计值为0.78,而ChatGPT-4的一致性为92%,Kappa统计值为0.88。尽管ChatGPT-4倾向于提供比ChatGPT-3.5更准确和一致的响应,但ChatGPT-3.5和-4之间的准确性和一致率之间没有统计学上的显着差异。ChatGPT-4具有较高的准确性和一致性,但未达到统计学意义。虽然这些发现令人鼓舞,仍有进一步发展的潜力,以实现更大的可靠性。这一进步对于确保管理CRRT机器相关问题的最高质量的患者护理和安全标准至关重要。
    The accurate interpretation of CRRT machine alarms is crucial in the intensive care setting. ChatGPT, with its advanced natural language processing capabilities, has emerged as a tool that is evolving and advancing in its ability to assist with healthcare information. This study is designed to evaluate the accuracy of the ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 models in addressing queries related to CRRT alarm troubleshooting. This study consisted of two rounds of ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 responses to address 50 CRRT machine alarm questions that were carefully selected by two nephrologists in intensive care. Accuracy was determined by comparing the model responses to predetermined answer keys provided by critical care nephrologists, and consistency was determined by comparing outcomes across the two rounds. The accuracy rate of ChatGPT-3.5 was 86% and 84%, while the accuracy rate of ChatGPT-4 was 90% and 94% in the first and second rounds, respectively. The agreement between the first and second rounds of ChatGPT-3.5 was 84% with a Kappa statistic of 0.78, while the agreement of ChatGPT-4 was 92% with a Kappa statistic of 0.88. Although ChatGPT-4 tended to provide more accurate and consistent responses than ChatGPT-3.5, there was no statistically significant difference between the accuracy and agreement rate between ChatGPT-3.5 and -4. ChatGPT-4 had higher accuracy and consistency but did not achieve statistical significance. While these findings are encouraging, there is still potential for further development to achieve even greater reliability. This advancement is essential for ensuring the highest-quality patient care and safety standards in managing CRRT machine-related issues.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:肿瘤溶解综合征(TLS)是一种以代谢和电解质失衡为特征的血液肿瘤急症。关于肿瘤细胞的分解,大量的钾,磷酸盐,核酸被释放到体循环中。TLS主要发生在化疗期间。然而,在开始治疗前,罕见发生自发性肿瘤溶解综合征(STLS).
    方法:在报告的病例中,这孩子刚刚做了活组织检查.当切口闭合时,突然高烧,心律失常,严重的高钾血症,低钙血症,和酸中毒。在及时对症治疗和连续肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)后,孩子的实验室结果有所改善,器官功能恢复正常。最终病理诊断为Burkitt淋巴瘤。这个男孩目前正在接受维持化疗。
    结论:TLS是一种潜在的危及生命的血液肿瘤并发症。从这个案例中可以得出几个重要的结论,提醒临床医生:(1)充分了解TLS的危险因素,评估风险水平;(2)术中注意STLS的可能性,如果必须进行外科手术,并且在最小的创伤和最短的时间内进行手术;(3)对高危TLS患者积极进行术前预防,包括积极的液体管理和合理使用利尿剂和降尿酸药物。此外,该病例证实了CRRT治疗严重STLS的有效性.
    BACKGROUND: Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is a hematologic oncological emergency characterized by metabolic and electrolyte imbalances. On breakdown of tumor cells, enormous amounts of potassium, phosphate, and nucleic acids are released into systemic circulation. TLS mainly occurs during chemotherapy. However, there are rare incidences of spontaneous tumor lysis syndrome (STLS) prior to commencement of therapy.
    METHODS: In the case being reported, the child had just undergone a biopsy. As the incision was being closed, there was a sudden onset of high fever, arrhythmia, severe hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, and acidosis. Following timely symptomatic treatment and continuous renal replacement therapy(CRRT), the child\'s laboratory results improved, and organ function was restored to normal. The final pathological diagnosis confirmed Burkitt lymphoma. The boy is currently on maintenance chemotherapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: TLS is a potentially life-threatening complication in hematologic oncology. Several important conclusions can be drawn from this case, reminding clinicians to: (1) be fully aware of the risk factors of TLS and evaluate the level of risk; (2) pay attention to the possibility of STLS during operation, if surgical procedures are necessary and operate with minimal trauma and in the shortest time possibly; (3) take preoperative prophylaxis actively for high-risk TLS patients, including aggressive fluid management and rational use of diuretics and uric-acid-lowering drugs. In addition, this case confirms the effectiveness of CRRT for severe STLS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    产气荚膜梭菌很少能引起严重的全身感染。通常来自腹部,与大量溶血有关,这通常是致命的。溶血性贫血和由毒素作用引起的急性肾损伤对于多器官功能障碍综合征(MODs)的发展至关重要。使这种情况成为真正的紧急情况,需要多专业技能和积极的多模式疗法。我们在此描述了一例55岁男性急性胆囊炎引起的脓毒性休克,由产气荚膜梭菌引起的大量溶血,该患者成功接受了早期血液净化和连续肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)以及抗生素治疗和手术治疗。梭状芽孢杆菌产生的大量毒素的作用引起强烈的细胞因子反应和溶血产物引起的损害是这种罕见但致命的临床实体的主要致病机制。治疗的主要目标是从血浆中清除毒素,阻断毒素作用,并通过使用抗菌剂实现细菌杀灭和控制感染焦点来进一步生产,清除废物,防止或限制多器官损害。血液净化技术由于具有很强的病理生理学原理而发挥着重要作用。因为它们可以从血浆中去除毒素和细胞因子以及无细胞产物,还可以取代肾功能。尽管这种情况很少见,缺乏可靠的数据,产气荚膜梭菌引起的大量溶血的血液净化技术是有希望的,值得进一步探讨.
    Clostridium perfringens can rarely cause severe systemic infections, usually from an abdominal source, associated with massive hemolysis, which is usually fatal. Hemolytic anemia and acute renal injury resulting from toxin action are critical for the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODs), making this condition a real emergency, requiring multispecialty skills and aggressive multimodal therapies. We herein describe a case of septic shock from acute cholecystitis with massive hemolysis caused by C. perfringens in a 55 year-old man that was successfully treated with early blood purification and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) along with antibiotic therapy and surgery. The effect of the enormous amount of toxins produced by Clostridium which elicit a strong cytokine response and the damage caused by the hemolysis products are the main pathogenetic mechanisms of this rare but lethal clinical entity. The main goal of treatment is to remove toxins from plasma, block toxin action, and further production by achieving bacterial killing with antimicrobial agents and controlling the infectious focus, remove waste products and prevent or limit multiorgan damage. Blood purification techniques play an important role due to a strong pathophysiological rationale, as they can remove toxins and cytokines as well as cell-free products from plasma and also replace renal function. Although this condition is rare and robust data are lacking, blood purification techniques for C. perfringens-induced massive hemolysis are promising and should be further explored.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号