BACKGROUND: Reports of adverse menstrual events emerged during the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in multiple countries. This raised the question whether these reports were caused by the vaccines. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate comparative studies on this topic (registered at PROSPERO [CRD42022324973]).
METHODS: We included observational studies such as cohort studies and surveys comparing the response to self-reported questionnaires between post- versus pre-vaccination data. PubMed and Cochrane Library searches were conducted on 1 September 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of any prespecified adverse menstrual event, and the outcome measure was the risk ratio. The meta-analysis was conducted by using the Mantel-Haenszel method and the random effects model. We summarized the results on risk factors as well as key findings of the studies included.
RESULTS: We retrieved 161 references from electronic databases and additional sources such as references lists. Of those, we considered 21 comparative observational studies. The meta-analysis of any adverse menstrual adverse event reported in 12 studies resulted in a pooled estimate (risk ratio 1.13; 95% CI, 0.96-1.31) that did not favor any group. The analysis was constrained by considerable clinical and statistical heterogeneity. Risk factors for self-reported menstrual changes included a history of COVID-19 infection, the concern about COVID-19 vaccines, smoking, previous cycle irregularities, depression, and stress, and other issues.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk ratio did not favor any group and heterogeneity was prevalent among the studies. Most studies suggested that the reported changes were temporary, minor, and nonserious.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affected persons with underlying medical conditions. SARS-CoV-2 infection susceptibility and vaccine effectiveness in pediatric hematology-oncology patients were unknown.
METHODS: From February to July 2022, anti-spike and anti-nucleocapsid Ig were assayed in 354 pediatric hematology-oncology subjects, including 53 oncology patients receiving chemotherapy (cancer), 150 patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), and 151 benign consult and long-term follow-up patients (controls). Participants completed a questionnaire.
RESULTS: Frequencies of COVID-19 infection, defined by positive PCR/antigen test or anti-nucleocapsid Ig, were 62% in cancer, 71% in SCD, 52% in controls, with SCD statistically different than controls (p = .001). Infection was associated with COVID-19 exposure, Hispanic/Latino or Black/African American ethnicity, multi-family dwelling, sports participation; COVID-19 booster decreased association with infection. In COVID-19-positive cancer patients, 58% had positive anti-nucleocapsid and 76% had positive anti-spike (≥10 U/mL), compared to essentially 100% seroconversion in SCD and controls (p < .0001, p = .01, respectively). Infection led to high anti-spike (≥2500 U/mL) in 12% cancer, 14% SCD, and 15% controls (p = .93). Vaccination resulted in anti-spike positivity in 90% cancer, 100% SCD, and 100% controls (p = .06), and in high anti-spike in 20% cancer, 47% SCD, and 41% controls (p = .36). Of boosted subjects, one of two cancer, 6/6 SCD, and 19/19 controls exhibited high anti-spike.
CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients demonstrated similar SARS-CoV-2 infection frequency as controls, but diminished antibody response to infection and vaccination. SCD patients exhibited seroconversion indistinguishable from controls. Vaccination was associated with higher frequency of high anti-spike than infection; vaccination plus booster was most effective in eliciting high anti-spike antibody detectable beyond 90 days.

Globally, the rollout of COVID-19 vaccine had been faced with a significant barrier in the form of vaccine hesitancy. This study adopts a multi-stage perspective to explore the prevalence and determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, focusing on their dynamic evolutionary features. Guided by the integrated framework of the 3Cs model (complacency, confidence, and convenience) and the EAH model (environmental, agent, and host), this study conducted three repeated national cross-sectional surveys. These surveys carried out from July 2021 to February 2023 across mainland China, targeted individuals aged 18 and older. They were strategically timed to coincide with three critical vaccination phases: universal coverage (stage 1), partial coverage (stage 2), and key population coverage (stage 3). From 2021 to 2023, the surveys examined sample sizes of 29 925, 6659, and 5407, respectively. The COVID-19 vaccine hesitation rates increased from 8.39% in 2021 to 29.72% in 2023. Urban residency, chronic condition, and low trust in vaccine developer contributed to significant COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy across the pandemic. Negative correlations between the intensity of vaccination policies and vaccine hesitancy, and positive correlations between vaccine hesitancy and long COVID, were confirmed. This study provides insights for designing future effective vaccination programs for emerging vaccine-preventable infectious X diseases.

The effects of COVID-19 vaccination on short-term and long-term cerebrovascular risks among COVID-19 survivors remained unknown. We conducted a national multi-center retrospective cohort study with 151 597 vaccinated and 151 597 unvaccinated COVID-19 patients using the TriNetX database, from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2023. Patients baseline characteristics were balanced with propensity score matching (PSM). The outcomes were incident cerebrovascular diseases occurred between 1st and 30th days (short-term) after COVID-19 diagnosis. Nine subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential effect modifications. We performed six sensitivity analyses, including evaluation of outcomes between 1st to 180th days, accounting for competing risk, and incorporating different variant timeline to test the robustness of our results. Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-Rank tests were performed to evaluate survival difference. Cox proportional hazards regressions were adopted to estimate the PSM-adjusted hazard ratios (HR). The overall short-term cerebrovascular risks were lower in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated group (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.56-0.77), specifically cerebral infarction (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.79), occlusion and stenosis of precerebral arteries (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.53-0.98), other cerebrovascular diseases (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.42-0.77), and sequelae of cerebrovascular disease (HR: 0.39, 95% CI:0.23-0.68). Similarly, the overall cerebrovascular risks were lower in those vaccinated among most subgroups. The long-term outcomes, though slightly attenuated, were consistent (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.87). Full 2-dose vaccination was associated with a further reduced risk of cerebrovascular diseases (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50-0.80) compared to unvaccinated patients. Unvaccinated COVID-19 survivors have significantly higher cerebrovascular risks than their vaccinated counterparts. Thus, clinicians are recommended to monitor this population closely for stroke events during postinfection follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Data on impact of COVID-19 vaccination and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 and acute ischemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy are scarce. Addressing this subject, we report our multicenter experience.
RESULTS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with COVID-19 and known vaccination status treated with mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke at 20 tertiary care centers between January 2020 and January 2023. Baseline demographics, angiographic outcome, and clinical outcome evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale score at discharge were noted. A multivariate analysis was conducted to test whether these variables were associated with an unfavorable outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale score >3. A total of 137 patients with acute ischemic stroke (48 vaccinated and 89 unvaccinated) with acute or subsided COVID-19 infection who underwent mechanical thrombectomy attributable to vessel occlusion were included in the study. Angiographic outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients were similar (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction ≥2b: 85.4% in vaccinated patients versus 86.5% in unvaccinated patients; P=0.859). The rate of functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score, ≤2) was 23.3% in the vaccinated group and 20.9% in the unvaccinated group (P=0.763). The mortality rate was 30% in both groups. In the multivariable analysis, vaccination status was not a significant predictor for an unfavorable outcome (P=0.957). However, acute COVID-19 infection remained significant (odds ratio, 1.197 [95% CI, 1.007-1.417]; P=0.041).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated no impact of COVID-19 vaccination on angiographic or clinical outcome of COVID-19-positive patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy, whereas worsening attributable to COVID-19 was confirmed.

While micronutrients are crucial for immune function, their impact on humoral responses to inactivated COVID-19 vaccination remains unclear. We investigated the associations between seven key micronutrients and antibody responses in 44 healthy adults with two doses of an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine. Blood samples were collected pre-vaccination and 28 days post-booster. We measured circulating minerals (iron, zinc, copper, and selenium) and vitamins (A, D, and E) concentrations alongside antibody responses and assessed their associations using linear regression analyses. Our analysis revealed inverse associations between blood iron and zinc concentrations and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibody binding affinity (AUC for iron: β = -258.21, p < 0.0001; zinc: β = -17.25, p = 0.0004). Notably, antibody quality presented complex relationships. Blood selenium was positively associated (β = 18.61, p = 0.0030), while copper/selenium ratio was inversely associated (β = -1.36, p = 0.0055) with the neutralizing ability against SARS-CoV-2 virus at a 1:10 plasma dilution. There was no significant association between circulating micronutrient concentrations and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG binding affinity. These findings suggest that circulating iron, zinc, and selenium concentrations and copper/selenium ratio, may serve as potential biomarkers for both quantity (binding affinity) and quality (neutralization) of humoral responses after inactivated COVID-19 vaccination. Furthermore, they hint at the potential of pre-vaccination dietary interventions, such as selenium supplementation, to improve vaccine efficacy. However, larger, diverse studies are needed to validate these findings. This research advances the understanding of the impact of micronutrients on vaccine response, offering the potential for personalized vaccination strategies.

BACKGROUND: The current study reported a case with a history of neuroradiculitis. Within 2 months of the COVID-19 vaccine, critical Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) appeared after acute diarrhea, progressive myasthenia, and sudden respiratory and cardiac symptoms.
METHODS: The syndrome was addressed with measures, such as endotracheal intubation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation vasoactive drugs. Next, we conducted six cycles of human immunoglobulin treatment (dose of 400 mg/kg·d intravenously for 5 days consecutively) and three times plasma exchange (PE, 30 ml/kg), followed by methylprednisolone sodium succinate. Rehabilitation training was carried out continuously.
RESULTS: The consciousness of the patient returned to normal, wherein he carried out normal communication. The muscle strength recovered gradually but still could not stand independently. Presently, he is recovering at home.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with previous radiculitis, COVID-19 vaccination may increase the susceptibility to GBS. Thus, it is recommended to extend the vaccination interval for these patients and ensure that any potential increased risk is continually assessed.

UNASSIGNED: Patients with end stage kidney disease on hemodialysis are vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Current guidelines recommend boosters of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based vaccines. The long-term humoral response of hemodialysis patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 after receiving a booster of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based vaccines has been incompletely characterized. Here, we determined the long-term humoral response of hemodialysis patients to two and three doses of the Pfizer BioNTech (BNT162b2) mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and investigated the effect of postbooster SARS-CoV-2 infection on antibody levels over time.
UNASSIGNED: Samples were collected on a monthly basis and tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against anti-spike S1 domain. Thirty-five hemodialysis patients were enrolled in the original study and 27 of these received a booster. Patients were followed up to 6 months after the first two doses and an additional 7 months after the third BNT162b2 dose. Results are presented as the internationally harmonized binding antibody units (BAU/mL).
UNASSIGNED: Antibody level significantly increased from prebooster to 2 weeks postbooster, with a median [25th, 75th percentile] rise from 52.72 [28.55, 184.7] to 6216 [3806, 11,730] BAU/mL in the total population. Of patients with a negative or borderline detectable antibody level 6 months after vaccination who received a third dose, 89% developed positive antibody levels 2 weeks postbooster. Postbooster antibody levels declined an average rate of 29% per month in infection-naïve patients. Antibody levels spiked in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 after receiving a booster but declined rapidly. No patients infected postbooster required hospitalization.
UNASSIGNED: A third dose of BNT162b2 restores antibody levels to high levels in dialysis patients but levels decline over time. A third dose did not necessarily prevent infection, but no patients suffered severe infection or required hospitalization. SARS-CoV-2 recovered patients appear to have a blunted rise in antibody levels after a third dose. Although patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 postbooster had an immediate spike in antibody levels, these declined over time.

Advancements in vaccination technologies mitigate disease transmission risks but may inadvertently suppress the behavioral immune system, an evolved disease avoidance mechanism. Applying behavioral immune system theory and utilizing robust big data analytics, we examined associations between rising vaccination coverage and government policies, public mobility, and online information seeking regarding disease precautions. We tested whether cultural tightness-looseness moderates the relationship between mass immunization and disease prevention vigilance. Comprehensive time series analyses were conducted using American data (Study 1) and international data (Study 2), employing transfer function modeling, cross-correlation function analysis, and meta-regression analysis. Across both the US and global analyses, as vaccination rates rose over time, government COVID-19 restrictions significantly relaxed, community mobility increased, and online searches for prevention information declined. The relationship between higher vaccination rates and lower disease prevention vigilance was stronger in culturally looser contexts. Results provide initial evidence that mass immunization may be associated with attenuated sensitivity and enhanced flexibility of disease avoidance psychology and actions. However, cultural tightness-looseness significantly moderates this relationship, with tighter cultures displaying sustained vigilance amidst immunization upticks. These findings offer valuable perspectives to inform nuanced policymaking and public health strategies that balance prudent precautions against undue alarm when expanding vaccine coverage worldwide.

Our case reported a 22-year-old male presented with headache, and sudden vision loss, 10 days after receiving the first dose of COVID-19 vaccination. Counting fingers in both eyes was his visual acuity on examination and bilateral optic disc edema on fundoscopy was found. Brain MRI was normal. After methylprednisolone pulse therapy, plasmapheresis, and IV cyclophosphamide courses, the optic disc edema disappeared, and his visual function did not improve. Reported cases of optic neuritis develop after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination are limited.