UNASSIGNED: Chronic venous disease (CVD) constitutes a frequently underdiagnosed pathological condition that progressively diminishes patients\' quality of life and imposes an escalating strain on healthcare resources. This study aims to comprehensively investigate the epidemiological landscape of varicose vein disease, examining age group distributions, gender patterns, residence influences, marital status correlations, weight considerations, educational impacts, and various aspects related to varicose veins.
UNASSIGNED: This was a single-centre retrospective analysis, in Albania from May 2018 to September 2023. Data were collected retrospectively through hospital records. Data collection involved administering a structured questionnaire to study participants, categorically organised into three sections. The first section focused on collecting demographic information, the second section involved self-perception of identifying risk factors associated with varicose veins, and the final section included inquiries about the history of variceal surgery.
UNASSIGNED: The CEAP classification distribution in our cohort revealed a predominant presence of C2 (varicose veins) in 53.3% of patients, followed by C3 (oedema) at 29.2%, and C4 (changes in skin and subcutaneous tissue secondary to CVD) at 10.5%, whereas C5 (healed venous ulcer) and C6 (active venous ulcer) were less frequent. Based on the body mass index (BMI) scale, data from patients indicated that 9.7% were in the category of underweight, 54.8% had a normal BMI, and 35.5% were categorised as overweight.
UNASSIGNED: The study\'s thorough exploration of patient perspectives, risk factors, and treatment choices contributes to a holistic understanding of varicose vein management, emphasising the importance of personalised approaches that account for demographic variations and individual beliefs.

Background and Objectives: The clinical relevance of \"corona phlebectatica\" and the management of risk factors for recurrence of venous ulcers in patients with chronic venous disease may be variable based on vascular specialists in different geographical areas of Italy. The aim of the present survey is to evaluate the management of patients with chronic venous disease by vascular specialists in different areas of the national territory. In particular, this involves ascertaining the clinical/prognostic relevance attributed to the presence of the \"corona phlebectatica\" as well as to the management of risk factors related to recurrence of venous ulcers. Materials and Methods: The web-based survey aimed at vascular medicine specialists with particular interest in venous disease. A questionnaire was developed, based on 12 questions, in relation to clinical assessment, risk factor management, and therapy in patients with chronic venous disease. Results: Almost all of the specialists involved actively participated in the survey, declaring that they personally manage chronic venous disease overall. There was a strong agreement in the prognostic consideration attributed to the presence of \"corona phlebectatica\" and to the management of risk factors for venous ulcer recurrence, regardless of the different geographical areas of interest. Conclusions: Accordingly with the results of this self-assessment survey, the skills and experience of the specialists involved appear to be of a good standard, both in the clinical evaluation and in the management of the progression of chronic venous disease. However, the need to reach more cultural insights into the correlations between chronic venous disease and risk factors correlated with disease progression emerges. Moreover, there was the need for a greater and tighter overall clinical control of a patient with chronic venous disease, also in relation to the presence of comorbidities.

OBJECTIVE: After the Fontan operation (ie, direct anastomosis of the caval veins to the pulmonary arteries, constituting right ventricular bypass circulation), high central venous pressure can lead to peripheral venous stasis and venous valvar insufficiency. We hypothesized that post-Fontan patients are at a higher risk of developing lower extremity venous lesions detectable using duplex ultrasound, even if clinical signs of chronic venous disease might not be evident.
METHODS: A total of 87 transplantation-free survivors after the Fontan procedure who reached adolescence or young adulthood (current age, 15-30 years) participated in a leg vein duplex ultrasound study. The median age at the Fontan procedure, median age at the vein study, and median interval between the two were 3.65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.1-5.3 years), 21.7 years (IQR, 18.9-24.7 years), and 16.6 years (IQR, 14.9-19.4 years), respectively. Duplex ultrasound scanning was performed using a venous ultrasound imaging system (Logiq P7; GE Healthcare). The patients were categorized according to the presence of venous reflux (VR) in the superficial, deep, or perforating venous systems: no VR, superficial VR (SVR), deep VR (DVR), perforating VR (PVR), and a combination of multiple venous systems. Correlation of the duplex ultrasound-detected venous lesions with clinical severity using the modified CEAP (clinical, etiological, anatomical, pathophysiological) classification was analyzed using Spearman\'s correlation analysis.
RESULTS: Leg pain was reported by 48 of 87 patients (55.2%). The duplex ultrasound findings for the cohort were no VR in 21 patients (24.1%), SVR in 22 (25.3%), isolated PVR in 21 (24.1%), and reflux of multiple venous systems in 23 patients, including SVR and PVR in 19, DVR and PVR in 1, and SVR, PVR, and DVR in 3 patients. Although the patients with advanced venous lesions detected by duplex ultrasound tended to have a higher CEAP clinical class (P < .001), VR of any venous system on duplex ultrasound was present even in patients with a lower CEAP clinical class. The CEAP clinical class was C0 for 66 patients (76%), and VR of any venous system was present on duplex ultrasound in 66 patients (76%).
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of lower extremity venous lesions detected by duplex ultrasound is strikingly high in post-Fontan adolescents and young adults, and duplex ultrasound-detected venous abnormalities can precede clinical manifestations. Early detection and timely intervention for leg vein problems are mandatory for post-Fontan patients, especially for those considered to have risk factors for developing chronic lower extremity venous disease.

BACKGROUND: Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) impacts the patient\'s quality of life. Available scales to determine its severity remain controversial, therefore, it is of importance to identify new auxiliary methods for the assessment of this sequelae. Measurement of skin hardness (MSH) might be decisive in tracking PTS. The purpose of this study is to assess if the use of durometry is an objective measure to evaluate prognosis of affected limbs in patients with PTS. We compared MSH of extremities with PTS vs healthy limbs, as well as their variation after 3 months of medical treatment to evaluate if durometry can be used to find differences. We strongly believe that measuring and keeping track of skin changes specifically skin hardness can be a useful factor in the prognosis and treatment of PTS.
METHODS: Prospective cohort study from January 2021 to February 2022 in patients with unilateral PTS. The MSH of the affected limb was compared to the healthy limb. A calibrated durometer was used, 4 measurements were completed at the time of diagnosis and subsequent follow-up were carried out after 3 months of treatment. The percentage of healing (in case of ulcers) and adherence to treatment was carefully monitored. The statistical program R was used.
RESULTS: A total of 1088 durometric measurements were performed on 17 patients, and 34 limbs. The MSH in limbs with PTS was 39.09 and in the control limbs (19.8) (P = <.00001). After 3 months of treatment, the MSH in PTS varied in PTS limbs (39.09 to 30.4) (P = <.000012). Adherence to treatment was 70.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: MSH varied between healthy limbs and the ones with PTS, before and after treatment. Durometry might represent a method for assessing skin changes in patients with PTS.

For patients with telangiectasia or reticular veins (CEAP [clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic] class C1), less invasive endovenous (EV) treatments have emerged. However, no prospective studies have compared compression stockings (CSs) and EV ablation treatment for C1 symptomatic refluxing saphenous veins. The present prospective study compared the therapeutic results of the two treatment modalities.
From June 2020 to December 2021, 46 patients with telangiectasia or reticular veins (<3 mm; class C1) with axial saphenous reflux and venous congestion symptoms were prospectively enrolled. The patients were assigned to CS (n = 21) or EV treatment (n = 25), according to patient preference. Complications, clinical improvement scales (eg, the venous clinical severity score [VCSS]), and quality of life, including the Aberdeen varicose vein symptom severity score (AVSS) and venous insufficiency epidemiological and economic study - quality of life/symptoms (VEINES-QOL/Sym), were evaluated and compared between the two groups at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.
No major complications occurred in either group. The median VCSS was 2.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.0-2.0), 1.0 (IQR, 0.5-2.0), 1.0 (IQR 0.0-1.0), and 0.0 (IQR 0.0-1.0) at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment in the CS group, respectively. The corresponding VCSSs were 3.0 (IQR, 1.0-3.0), 1.0 (IQR, 0.0-1.0), 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-0.0), and 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-0.0) in the EV group. The median AVSS was 4.4 (IQR, 3.0-5.5), 2.1 (IQR, 1.3-4.6), 1.0 (IQR, 0.0-2.8), and 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-1.8) at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment in the CS group, respectively. The corresponding scores were 6.2 (IQR, 3.8-12.3), 1.6 (IQR, 0.6-2.8), 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-2.6), and 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-0.4) in the EV group. The mean VEINES-QOL/Sym score was 92.7 ± 8.1, 100.4 ± 7.3, 104.3 ± 8.2, and 106.0 ± 9.7 in the CS group at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment, respectively. The corresponding scores were 83.6 ± 8.0, 102.9 ± 6.6, 107.9 ± 3.9, and 109.6 ± 3.7 in the EV group. Both groups showed considerable improvement in the VCSS, AVSS, and VEIN-SYM/QOL scores, and no significant between-group differences were observed for ≤6 months. Among the severely symptomatic patients (pretreatment VEINES-QOL/Sym score ≤90), the EV group exhibited more marked improvement (P = .029 for the VCSS and P = .030 for the VEINES-QOL/Sym score).
Both CSs and EV treatment provided clinical and quality of life improvement in symptomatic C1 patients with refluxing saphenous veins, with no significant between-group differences. However, a subgroup analysis revealed that EV treatment provided statistically significant improvement in the severe symptomatic C1 group.

For the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI), various therapeutic options are available. In addition to conservative compression therapy, classical vein surgery, sclerotherapy and endoluminal therapies are increasingly being used to treat varicose veins. For a differentiated indication and correct treatment planning, a stepwise diagnosis with clinical examination and documentation of typical symptoms, dynamic vein function measurement to assess the global venous status as well as a qualitative assessment of the exact insufficient vein segments by means of color-coded duplex sonography is required. Due to the non-invasiveness of the examination and the good assessability of therapeutically relevant parameters such as anatomic conditions, diameter, and reflux of insufficient veins, color-coded duplex sonography is considered the gold standard for imaging diagnostics.
UNASSIGNED: Für die Behandlung der chronischen venösen Insuffizienz (CVI) haben sich mittlerweile verschiedene Therapieoptionen etabliert. So kommen neben der konservativen Kompressionstherapie, der klassisch operativen Entfernung und der Sklerotherapie zunehmend auch endoluminale Therapien korrespondierender Varizen zum Einsatz. Für eine differenzierte Indikationsstellung und korrekte Therapieplanung bedarf es einer stufenweisen Diagnostik mit befundorientierter klinischer Untersuchung, einer dynamischen Venenfunktionsmessung zur Beurteilung der global-venösen Gefäßsituation sowie einer qualitativen Beurteilung der exakten Insuffizienzstrecken mittels einer farbkodierten Duplexsonographie. Aufgrund der Nichtinvasivität der Untersuchung und der guten Beurteilbarkeit von therapeutisch relevanten Parametern wie anatomischem Verlauf, Durchmesser und Refluxstrecken insuffizienter Venen wird die Duplexsonographie heute als Goldstandard für die bildgebende Diagnostik angesehen.

BACKGROUND: Chronic venous disease (CVD) is characterized by venous hypertension and stasis, which occur because of valvular incompetence and/or venous outflow obstruction. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between CVD clinical presentation and duplex ultrasonography findings in a Thai patient population.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study examined patients diagnosed with CVD at the Chulabhorn Hospital Vascular Clinic (Bangkok, Thailand) between December 1, 2018 and October 1, 2021. Patient data was obtained from the medical records and review of lower limb venous ultrasonography studies. Patients were assessed using the Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, and Pathological (CEAP) classification of venous disorders: mild-to-moderate CVD was defined as C1 to C3 and severe CVD was defined as C4 to C6.
RESULTS: Overall, 260 CVD patients were analyzed (60 men and 200 women). More than 75% of the patients were women and more than 80% had bilateral lower limb involvement. Factors associated with severe CVD were older age, female sex, high body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and history of deep venous thrombosis. The most common CEAP classification was C2 (38.8%), followed by C1 (33.85%), C4 (12.2%), C3 (9.23%), C6 (3.46%), and C5 (2.31%). Two-thirds of the patients had great saphenous vein reflux and nearly half had perforator vein reflux. Perforator reflux and small saphenous vein reflux were significantly associated with severe CVD (P < 0.001 and P = 0.028, respectively). Higher number of venous systems involved was significantly associated with severe CVD (P = 0.005). Reflux time of the great saphenous vein correlated with severe CVD and VCSS (P = 0.026 and P = 0.037, respectively). Mean diameters of the superficial vein, perforator vein, and deep vein and reflux times of the perforator and deep veins were not significantly associated with severe CVD.
CONCLUSIONS: The major risk factors for severe CVD are older age, female sex, high body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and history of deep venous thrombosis. The most common CEAP classification was C2 (39%). Great saphenous vein reflux was the most common type of reflux in our study population. Increasing number of venous systems involved increased the risk of severe CVD. The presence of perforator vein reflux and small saphenous vein reflux also increased the risk of severe CVD. Reflux time of the great saphenous vein correlated with severe CVD and venous clinical severity score.

UNASSIGNED: The prevalence of chronic venous disease (CVD), a common health care problem, is still underestimated. A few previous epidemiologic studies have report Asian patients with this condition in western countries, but not in Asian countries. The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for CVD and its treatment in Thai individuals.
UNASSIGNED: In this cross-sectional study, we collected data of patients with CVD visiting Chulabhorn Hospital Vascular Clinic from 1 December 2018-1 October 2021. We reviewed medical records for patient characteristics, comorbidities, Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, Pathophysiology (CEAP) categories, Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), ultrasound findings and treatment.
UNASSIGNED: The study cohort comprised 260 CVD patients with CVD of mean age 61.92 ± 12.82 years. Almost 80% of participants were female. A history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was the strongest risk factor for severe CVD. Other identified risk factors comprised body-mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2, and older age. The most common CEAP categories were C2 (39%) and C1 (33.8%). Superficial venous reflux was the most common location of venous reflux in this study, 67.32% of participants having great saphenous vein reflux and 16.99% small saphenous vein reflux. Only 4.76% of our cohort had both reflux and obstruction. Most of the participants had undergone compression therapy, approximately half of them complying well with wearing of stockings. Nineteen percent of our cohort had undergone sclerotherapy and 14% surgery, which comprised radiofrequency ablation in 97% of them.
UNASSIGNED: The major risk factors for severe CVD identified in this study were deep vein thrombosis, body mass index>30 kg/m2 and older age. The most common CEAP category was C2 (39%). GSV was the most commonly involved venous system. Involvement of numerous venous systems was a risk factor for severe CVD.

OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound of the saphenous vein and measurement of the vein diameter may have a role in determining the severity of varicose veins. This study aimed to compare the saphenous vein diameter with the CEAP classification, as the reference standard in determining the severity of chronic venous diseases, in patients with lower limbs varicose veins free from saphenous vein reflux.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 100 patients with lower limbs varicose veins (saphenous vein) and free from saphenous vein reflux were enrolled. Demographic data (age, gender, body mass index (BMI)) were collected using a checklist. The severity of varicose veins was determined using the standard CEAP classification. The saphenous vein diameter was measured using ultrasonography.
RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 43 years and there were 68 female patients. According to the CEAP classification, 13 patients had no varicose veins (CEAP class C0). However, 87 patients had varicose veins (65 patients with class C1, one patient with class C2, and 21 patients with class C3). Mean saphenous vein diameter in the whole sample was 6.7 mm. There was no significant relationship between the severity of varicose veins determined by CEAP classification and mean saphenous vein diameter measured by ultrasound. Mean saphenous vein diameter in C0, C1, C2, and C3 groups were respectively 1.7 mm, 6.7 mm, 8 mm, and 8.7 mm (P= 0.71). On the other hand, mean saphenous vein diameter was higher significantly in those with higher body mass index (BMI) and among older patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that saphenous vein diameter did not differ significantly between CEAP C0 through C4 classes. However, the severity of varicose vein was more prominent in older patients and those with higher BMI.

OBJECTIVE: Low-grade primary superficial venous reflux (C0-C3 EpAsPr [Ep (primary), As (superficial), and Pr (reflux)]) is a common feature of chronic venous disease. However, the procedural efficacy focusing on symptom characteristics and improvement patterns in this population has not been fully explored.
METHODS: From 2018 to 2019, 325 limbs from 279 patients with C0-C3 EpAsPr (including 66.1% with C0-C1) who had undergone cyanoacrylate ablation (CA) with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) or endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) with UGFS were included in the present study. Venous symptoms were classified into five categories: leg heaviness, calf cramping, itching sensation, pain, and numbness. A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis of data collected using a prospectively designed case report form was performed to identify the improvement magnitude of each symptom. As secondary outcomes, the postoperative changes in symptom severity (0-5 points), venous reflux-originated severity score, venous clinical severity score (VCSS), and 14-item chronic venous insufficiency quality of life questionnaire (CIVIQ-14) were evaluated in a 3-month postoperative data analysis.
RESULTS: After adjusting the data, 174 limbs (CA with UGFS, n = 87; EVLA with UGFS, n = 87) were matched. The symptoms with the greatest improvement after treatment were night cramping (94.7%) and itching (93.8%), followed by heaviness (85.2%), numbness (77.8%), and pain (60.9%). All symptom improvement scores after each endovenous procedure showed similar patterns in both groups. The advantages of CA with UGFS over EVLA with UGFS were a shorter procedure time (20.1 ± 10.6 minutes vs 28.4 ± 10.9 minutes; P = .001) and lower perioperative visual analog for pain scores (2.99 ± 2.34 vs 3.74 ± 2.49; P = .03). Compared with the preoperative values, the venous reflux originated severity score, VCSS, CIVIQ-14 score, and symptom severity score were significantly improved in both groups (P < .001 for all). Improvements in all five symptoms (P = .085 to P = 1.0), VCSS (P = .435), CIVIQ-14 score (P = .788), and satisfaction score (P = .392) at 3 months postoperatively were comparable between the two groups. In the CA group, 2 cases of endovenous glue-induced thrombosis and 24 cases (27.6%) of type IV hypersensitivity reactions occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive endovenous surgery with CA and EVLA provides significant symptom improvement for patients with low-grade CEAP classes.