CASIA2

CASIA2
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究的目的是评估现有的可植入结束镜(ICL)尺寸配方的准确性,特别是使用CASIA2和ANTERION设备的NK和KS公式,并介绍一种旨在提高术后穹窿结局可预测性的新方法。
    方法:回顾性病例系列。
    方法:使用CASIA2和ANTERION装置进行术前测量。NK和KS配方的功效,将其整合到CASIA2中,通过将其预测的拱顶值与手术后一个月获得的实际术后测量值进行比较来评估。进行了逐步多元回归分析,目的是开发一种新的,更准确的预测公式,以实现最佳ICL施胶。
    结果:与现有的NK和KS公式相比,从ANTERION测量中开发的新公式在预测最佳ICL大小方面表现出了更高的准确性,平均拱顶为0.535±0.200毫米,与NK和KS公式的0.419±0.172mm和0.466±0.103mm相比,分别。回归分析确定了影响最佳ICL大小确定的几个重要参数。
    结论:这项研究提出了一种新的ICL尺寸公式,该公式利用了ANTERION设备的测量结果,由详细的多元回归分析支持。研究结果表明,这种新方法显著提高了ICL大小预测的准确性,潜在地降低与尺寸不当相关的并发症的风险。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of existing implantable collamer lens (ICL) sizing formulas, specifically the NK and KS formulas using CASIA2 and ANTERION devices, and to introduce a novel method aimed at improving the predictability of postoperative vault outcomes.
    METHODS: Retrospective case series.
    METHODS: Preoperative measurements were taken using both CASIA2 and ANTERION devices. The efficacy of the NK and KS formulas, which are integrated into CASIA2, was assessed by comparing their predicted vault values against actual postoperative measurements obtained one month after surgery. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed with the aim of developing a new, more accurate predictive formula for optimal ICL sizing.
    RESULTS: When compared to the existing NK and KS formulas, the new formula developed from ANTERION measurements demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting optimal ICL size, with a mean vault of 0.535 ± 0.200 mm, compared to 0.419 ± 0.172 mm and 0.466 ± 0.103 mm for the NK and KS formulas, respectively. The regression analysis identified several significant parameters influencing the determination of optimal ICL size.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a novel formula for ICL sizing that leverages measurements from the ANTERION device, supported by a detailed multiple regression analysis. The findings suggest that this new approach significantly enhances the accuracy of ICL size prediction, potentially reducing the risk of complications associated with improper sizing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:提出一种动态浦肯野测定法的新方法,并通过与市售的眼前节光学相干断层扫描CASIA2进行比较来验证。
    方法:组装了具有可移动固定目标的动态Purkinje-meter。由红外LED形成的同轴圆形图案被投射到眼睛上,并引起浦肯野图像(第1,3rd,第四=P1、P3、P4)。对29只眼植入复曲面IOL(人工晶状体)进行测量,在散瞳条件下,参考视觉轴。根据P3和P4叠加时刻的固定目标的位置计算IOL倾斜。IOL偏心是根据轴上固定期间P1的相对位置以及离轴固定期间P3和P4叠加的相对位置确定的。使用定制开发的软件进行距离测量。使用CASIA2,通过设备完全计算IOL位置。
    结果:CASIA2和Purkinje-meter值之间的平均绝对差对于倾斜幅度为0.6°±0.4°,对于倾斜方向为10°±10°,偏心幅度为0.11mm±0.08mm,偏心方向为16°±14°。对于倾斜和偏心方向,通过两种方法确定的值之间没有统计学上的显着差异。倾斜和偏心幅度的差异具有统计学意义。
    结论:两种设备的IOL倾斜和偏心方向的值相似。Purkinje仪测量的IOL倾斜和偏心幅度值高于CASIA2,但总体而言,它们对应于其他已发表研究中提出的值。
    OBJECTIVE: To present a new method of dynamic Purkinje-metry and to verify it by comparison with a commercially available anterior segment optical coherence tomography CASIA2.
    METHODS: A dynamic Purkinje-meter with a movable fixation target was assembled. A coaxial circular pattern formed by infrared LEDs was projected onto the eye and evoked Purkinje images (1st, 3rd, 4th = P1, P3, P4). The measurement was performed on 29 eyes with an implanted toric IOL (intraocular lens), under mydriatic conditions, with reference to the visual axis. The IOL tilt was calculated from the position of a fixation target at the moment of P3 and P4 superposition. The IOL decentration was determined based on the relative position of P1 during on-axis fixation and of P3 and P4 superposition during off-axis fixation. A custom-developed software was used for distance measurements. Using CASIA2, the IOL position was fully calculated by the device.
    RESULTS: The mean absolute difference between CASIA2 and Purkinje-meter values was 0.6° ± 0.4° for the tilt magnitude and 10° ± 10° for the tilt direction, and 0.11 mm ± 0.08 mm for the decentration magnitude and 16° ± 14° for the decentration direction. There was no statistically significant difference between the values determined by the two methods for the tilt and decentration direction. The differences were statistically significant for the tilt and decentration magnitude.
    CONCLUSIONS: The values of IOL tilt and decentration direction are similar for both devices. The values of IOL tilt and decentration magnitude measured by Purkinje-meter are higher than those from CASIA2, but overall, they correspond to the values presented in other published studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在比较急性获得性共同性内斜视(AACE)患者和对照组的晶状体形态和位置,睫状肌麻痹之前和之后。
    方法:这是一项前瞻性观察性临床研究。使用CASIA2系统评估了53例AACE患者和32例对照受试者在睫状肌麻痹前后的晶状体形态和位置参数,这代表了最新的扫频源眼前段光学相干断层扫描。通过在12岁以下的患者中施用1%的阿托品和在12岁以上的患者中施用1%的环戊酸钠来记录红细胞麻痹性屈光。形态学参数包括前曲率半径(ARC),后曲率半径(PRC),透镜厚度(LTH),和等效直径的透镜(LED)。位置参数包括透镜偏心(LD)和透镜倾斜(LT)。在AACE和对照组之间进行了睫状肌麻痹前后这些参数的比较。此外,这项研究分析并比较了这些参数在睫状肌麻痹后的变化。
    结果:我们的研究结果表明,包括ARC在内的形态学参数没有显着差异,PRC,AACE患者和对照组在睫状肌麻痹之前或之后的LTH和LED。然而,0°子午线的2D建模数据显示,AACE患者右眼LD(晶状体移位)的睫状肌麻痹后变化不同,测量-0.03(0.08)[中位数(四分位距)]与对照组显着不同,表现出0.01(0.06)的测量值(z=-2.373,p=0.018)。在左眼,在AACE中,0°子午线的镜头偏移为0.02(0.06),观察到类似的趋势,与对照组的测量值-0.02(0.08)显着不同(z=-2.809,p=0.005)。Further,相关分析显示,晶状体的时间偏移较大与ARC(r=0.294,p=0.006)和LTH(r=-0.230,p=0.031)的变化较大相关。
    结论:AACE患者和对照组的晶状体形态特征相似;然而,仅在AACE患者中观察到睫状肌麻痹引起的晶状体位置改变,暗示与过度住宿有关。
    OBJECTIVE: The study aims to compare morphology and location of crystalline lens between acute acquired concomitant esotropia (AACE) patients and control subjects, both before and after cycloplegia.
    METHODS: This is a prospective and observational clinical study. Morphological and locational parameters of the crystalline lens in 53 AACE patients and 32 control subjects were assessed before and after cycloplegia using CASIA2 system, which represents the latest swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Cycloplegic refraction was recorded by administering 1% atropine in patients younger than 12 years and 1% cyclopentolate in those > 12 years old. Morphological parameters included anterior radius of curvature (ARC), posterior radius of curvature (PRC), lens thickness (LTH), and equivalent diameter of lens (LED). Locational parameters comprised lens decentration (LD) and lens tilt (LT). Comparison of these parameters before and after cycloplegia were conducted between AACE and controls. Additionally, the study analyzed and compared the changes in these parameter post-cycloplegia.
    RESULTS: Our findings suggest no significant difference in morphological parameters including ARC, PRC, LTH and LED between AACE patients and controls before or after cycloplegia. However, 2D-modeling data in the 0° meridian revealed that variation post-cycloplegia of LD (lens shift) in right eyes was different in AACE patients, measuring - 0.03(0.08) [median(interquartile range)] which was significantly distinct from the control group, exhibiting a measurement of 0.01(0.06) (z =  - 2.373, p = 0.018). In left eyes, a similar trend was observed with lens shift in the 0° meridian being 0.02(0.06) in AACE, significantly differing from control group\'s measurement of - 0.02(0.08) (z =  - 2.809, p = 0.005). Further, correlation analysis revealed that larger temporal shift of lens was associated with greater changes in ARC (r = 0.294, p = 0.006) and LTH (r =  - 0.230, p = 0.031).
    CONCLUSIONS: The morphological features of the crystalline lens were similar in AACE patients and controls; however, the change of lens location by cycloplegia was observed only in AACE patients, suggesting an association with excessive accommodation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究ICLV4c植入后拱顶的变化率以及与眼前节参数的相关性。
    从招募的37名近视受试者中总共研究了64只眼。在1周时使用CASIA2记录金库,1个月,术后3个月和6个月以及术前眼前节参数包括瞳孔直径,镜头拱顶,前房深度,前房宽度,虹膜面积(IA),虹膜厚度,角度开口距离,角度凹陷区域,小梁虹膜空间面积,和小梁虹膜角度。比较不同时间间隔的拱顶变化率,并分析其与眼前节参数之间的相关性。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
    在1周至1个月之间,拱顶减少的速率为-19.53±111.28μm/月,1个月至3个月之间为-19.90±29.71μm/月,3个月至6个月之间为-4.25±18.10μm/月;因此,手术后3个月的速度显着减慢(P=0.024)。拱顶平均变化率与IA呈显著正相关(R2=0.140,F=4.980,P=0.01)。与其他眼前节参数无显著相关性(均P>0.05)。
    从术后3个月开始,保险库的减少速度显着放缓。较大的IA可能意味着拱顶变化的减小率较低。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the rate of vault changes after implantation of ICL V4c and the correlation with anterior segment parameters.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 64 eyes were studied from the 37 myopic subjects recruited. CASIA2 was used to record the vault at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the operation as well as the preoperative anterior segment parameters including pupil diameter, lens vault, anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber width, iris area (IA), iris thickness, angle opening distance, angle recess area, trabecular iris space area, and trabecular iris angle. The rates of vault change in different time intervals were compared and the correlations between the rates and anterior segment parameters were analyzed. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
    UNASSIGNED: The rate of vault decrease was -19.53 ± 111.28 μm/month between 1 week and 1 month, -19.90 ± 29.71 μm/month between 1 month and 3 months and -4.25 ± 18.10 μm/month between 3 months and 6 months; hence the rate was shown to slow down significantly from 3 months post-operation (P = 0.024). The average rate of vault changes showed a significant positive correlation with IA (R2 = 0.140, F = 4.980, P = 0.01). No significant correlation was found with other anterior segment parameters (all P > 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: The rate of decreasing vault significantly slowed down from 3 months post-operation. A larger IA may imply a lower decreasing rate of vault change.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估两种扫频源光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT)设备获得的角膜曲率的差异和相似性,白内障患者的Scheimpflug成像系统和一个射线跟踪像差仪。此外,这项研究旨在比较后角膜(PK)的差异,IOLMaster700、CASIA2和Pentacam中的总角膜(TK)和真净功率(TNP)测量。
    方法:共200眼200例患者(116名女性,58%)参加了这项研究,平均年龄65.9±9.5岁。最平坦的(Kf),最陡(Ks),和平均能力(Km),J0和J45是使用两个基于SS-OCT的生物识别设备获得的,一个旋转摄像系统和一个射线跟踪像差仪。PK,还使用这些装置测量TK和TNP值。为了评估设备之间的差异和相似性,弗里德曼测试,皮尔逊相关系数(r),使用了具有95%一致性界限(LoA)的组内系数相关性(ICC)和Bland-Altman地块,并生成箱线图和堆叠直方图来描述数据的分布。
    结果:对于角膜曲率测量值,IOLMaster700和Pentacam之间没有显着差异。此外,IOLMaster700和iTrace在评估J0和J45方面没有显著差异.布兰德·奥特曼地块显示出相对较宽的LoA宽度,在四个设备中,角膜曲率测量值几乎大于1屈光度,J0和J45值几乎大于0.5屈光度。就PK和TK值而言,在这三种设备中发现了显著差异和较低的ICC。
    结论:尽管在Kf的IOLMaster700,CASIA2,Pentacam和iTrace之间发现了很强的相关性和良好的一致性,Ks,在Km和J0、J45中,由于宽的LoA宽度和设备之间存在显著差异,测量似乎不应该互换使用。同样,由于显著的差异和较低的ICC,PK,IOLMaster700、CASIA2和Pentacam获得的TK和TNP值不应互换使用。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the differences and similarities in the corneal curvature obtained by two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) devices, Scheimpflug imaging system and one ray tracing aberrometer in patients with cataracts. Moreover, this study aimed to compare the differences in posterior corneal (PK), total corneal (TK) and true net power (TNP) measurements among the IOLMaster 700, CASIA2, and Pentacam.
    METHODS: A total of 200 eyes of 200 patients (116 female, 58%) were enrolled in this study, with a mean age of 65.9 ± 9.5 years. The flattest (Kf), steepest (Ks), and mean cornal powers (Km), J0, and J45 were obtained using two SS-OCT-based biometric devices, one rotating camera system and one ray-tracing aberrometer. The PK, TK and TNP values were also measured using these devices. To evaluate the differences and similarities between the devicves, the Friedman test, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) and Bland‒Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used, and boxplots and stacked histograms were generated to describe the distributions of the data.
    RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam for any of the keratometry values. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the IOLMaster 700 and iTrace in evaluating J0 and J45. Bland‒Altman plots revealed relatively wide LoA widths, almost larger than 1 diopter for the keratometry values and almost larger than 0.5 diopter for J0 and J45 values among the four devices. In terms of PK and TK values, significant differences and low ICCs were found among the three devices.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although strong correlations and good agreement were found among the IOLMaster700, CASIA2, Pentacam and iTrace for Kf, Ks, Km and J0, J45, it seems that the measurements should not be used interchangeably because of the wide LoA widths and the presence of significant differences among the devices. Similarly, due to significant differences and low ICCs, the PK, TK and TNP values obtained by IOLMaster 700, CASIA2, and Pentacam should not be used interchangeably.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究Pentacam和CASIA2在评估近视眼角膜密度(CD)和晶状体密度(LD)方面的一致性。
    方法:53例(106只眼)接受了全面的眼科检查。CD和LD分别使用Pentacam和CASIA2进行测量,根据获得的图像的灰度百分比。使用一致性组内相关系数(ICC)评估了Pentacam和CASIA2之间的协议,并使用Bland-Altman地块表示。
    结果:与Pentacam相比,CASIA2在所有测量区域中显示出显著较高的CD和LD值。Pentacam和CASIA2测得的平均CD和LD的ICC分别为0.726和0.757。所有角膜区域和晶状体的ICC值均在0.7以上,除了在0-2mm区域测量角膜(0.455),这表明两个设备之间有很好的一致性,其结果具有不同程度的线性相关性。Bland-Altman地块显示,在光密度测量结果之间的一致性范围之外的点的平均百分比为3.93%。不同年龄段的ICC相似,但在高度近视组(中低度近视,CD:0.739,LD:0.753;高度近视,CD:0.621,LD:0.760)。
    结论:CASIA2在测量CD和LD方面与Pentacam表现出良好的一致性,除了在中央角膜和高度近视中测量CD。尽管数值结果与Pentacam相比存在差异,这使得这两个设备不可互换,CASIA2提供了一种可靠的替代光密度测量方法。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the agreement between Pentacam and CASIA2 in the evaluation of corneal densities (CDs) and lens densities (LDs) in myopes.
    METHODS: Fifty-three patients (106 eyes) underwent comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations. CDs and LDs were measured using Pentacam and CASIA2, respectively, based on the grayscale percentage of the obtained images. Agreement between Pentacam and CASIA2 was evaluated using the consistency intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and represented using Bland-Altman plots.
    RESULTS: Compared to Pentacam, CASIA2 showed significantly higher CD and LD values in all measured zones. The ICC of the average CD and LD measured by the Pentacam and CASIA2 were 0.726 and 0.757, respectively. The ICC values of all corneal zones and lenses were above 0.7, except for the measurement of the cornea in the 0-2 mm zone (0.455), suggesting good consistency between the two devices, whose results were of different levels of linear correlation. Bland-Altman plots showed mean percentages of 3.93% for the points falling outside the limits of agreement among the densitometry results. The ICCs in different age groups were similar, but the agreement was poorer in the high myopia group (low and moderate myopia, CD: 0.739, LD: 0.753; high myopia, CD: 0.621, LD: 0.760).
    CONCLUSIONS: CASIA2 demonstrated good consistency with Pentacam in the measurement of CD and LD, except for measurement of CD in the central cornea and in high myopia. Despite difference in the numerical results compared with Pentacam, which made the two devices uninterchangeable, CASIA2 provides a reliable alternative densitometric measurement method.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨近视患者晶状体形态与像差的关系。
    方法:这项横断面研究包括155名右眼近视患者。球面屈光力和柱面屈光力是通过睫状体自折射获得的。根据它们的球面当量(SE)值将眼睛分成三组进行分析。使用OPD扫描III测量4mm和6mm的眼像差和内部像差。使用CASIA2测量透镜参数,包括透镜厚度(LT),前/后晶状体表面曲率半径(RAL/RPL),透镜偏心(DEC),和镜头倾斜(倾斜)。用ANOVA或KruskalWallis检验分析三组之间透镜状参数和像差参数的差异。进行Pearson相关或Spearman相关分析以评估晶状体参数与像差之间的关系。p值<0.05表示有统计学意义。
    结果:LT的差异,RAL,DEC和TITL在三组间有统计学意义(p<0.05)。内部高阶像差差异存在差异,球面像差,和昏迷像差(p<0.05)。球面功率与LT、TITL呈正相关(p<0.05),与DEC呈负相关,RAL,和RPL(p<0.05)。柱面功率与LT呈正相关(p<0.05),与DEC呈负相关(p<0.05);透镜参数(LT,RAL,DEC,和TILT)主要与眼像差和内部球差相关。LT和DEC与眼和内部高阶像差和昏迷像差相关。
    结论:DEC和LT是影响近视患者像差的主要因素。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between lens morphology and aberrations in patients with myopia.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 155 patients with myopia in their right eyes. Spherical power and cylindrical power were achieved by cycloplegic autorefraction. The eyes were divided into three groups for analysis based on their spherical equivalent (SE) values. The 4 mm and 6 mm ocular and internal aberrations were measured using the OPD-scan III. Lens parameters were measured using CASIA2, including lens thickness (LT), radius of anterior/posterior lens surface curvature (RAL/RPL), lens decentration (DEC), and lens tilt (TILT). The differences of lenticular parameters and aberration parameters among the three groups analyzed with ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis test. Pearson correlation or Spearman correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationships between the lens parameters and aberrations. A p value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
    RESULTS: The difference in LT, RAL, DEC and TITL among the three groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05). And there were differences among differences in internal high-order aberrations, spherical aberration, and coma aberration(p < 0.05).Spherical power was positively correlated with LT and TITL (p < 0.05) and negatively correlated with DEC, RAL, and RPL (p < 0.05). Cylindrical power was positively correlated with LT (p < 0.05) and negatively correlated DEC (p < 0.05); The lenticular parameters (LT, RAL, DEC, and TILT) were mainly correlated with the ocular and internal spherical aberration. LT and DEC were correlated with ocular and internal higher-order aberrations and coma aberration.
    CONCLUSIONS: DEC and LT were the main factors affecting aberrations in patients with myopia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估扫频源OCT(CASIA2)与UBM在原发性闭角型青光眼中的一致性。
    方法:对被诊断为原发性闭角型青光眼的40名参与者的80只眼进行检查。参数测量夹角开口距离(AOD),角槽区域(ARA),小梁虹膜空间面积(TISA),小梁虹膜角度(TIA),镜头拱顶(LV),前房深度(ACD),和前房宽度(ACW)。鼻腔的角度图像,temporal,上级,下段通过CASIA2和UBM的前节模式获得。采用单因素方差分析和配对t检验进行统计学分析。并通过内部相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman方法进行了一致性分析。
    结果:单因素方差分析成对比较显示,在原发性闭角型青光眼患者中,CASIA2或UBM具有最窄的上房角和最宽的颞房角。配对t检验表明,器件间AOD,TIA,ARA,上腔角度和TISA差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。LV的测量值无显著差异,ACD,和ACW(p>0.05)。通过Bland-Altman方法比较,所有参数的一致性很好。ICC结果显示,除优于ARA500(0.739)外,其他角度参数的一致性中等。
    结论:在前房角测量过程中,我们应该多注意眼睑覆盖的上腔角度。尽管CASIA2和UBM之间的协议是可以接受的,由于两种设备之间的巨大统计差异,测量结果不能被认为是可互换的。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement between swept-source OCT (CASIA2) and UBM in primary angle-closure glaucoma.
    METHODS: Eighty eyes of 40 participants diagnosed with primary angle-closure glaucoma were examined. Parameters measured included angle opening distance (AOD), angle recess area (ARA), trabecular iris space area (TISA), trabecular iris angle (TIA), lens vault (LV), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and anterior chamber width (ACW). Angle images of nasal, temporal, superior, and inferior were acquired by the anterior segment mode of CASIA2 and UBM. One-way analysis of variance and paired t-test were used for statistical analysis, and the agreement was analyzed by internal correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method.
    RESULTS: One-way ANOVA pairwise comparison showed that CASIA2 or UBM had the narrowest superior chamber angle and the widest temporal chamber angle in patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma. The paired t-test showed that inter-device AOD, TIA, ARA, and TISA of superior chamber angle had significant differences (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the measured values of LV, ACD, and ACW (p > 0.05). The agreement of all parameters is good through the Bland-Altman method comparison. ICC result showed moderate agreement in other angle parameters except for superior ARA500 (0.739).
    CONCLUSIONS: In the anterior chamber angle measurement process, we should pay more attention to the superior chamber angle covered by eyelids. Although the agreement is acceptable between CASIA2 and UBM, the measurements could not be considered interchangeable due to the tremendous statistical difference between the two devices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Aim: To evaluate the effects of 0.5% tropicamide on anterior segment parameters with the CASIA2 imaging device in emmetropic, myopic, and hyperopic eyes. Methods: In this prospective study, a total of 125 subjects (34 emmetropic subjects, 57 myopic subjects, and 34 hyperopic subjects) at the Shanghai Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University were recruited from June 2021 to September 2021. The 0.5% tropicamide solution was used once every 5 min a total of 5 times for cycloplegia. The anterior segment parameters were recorded by CASIA2 before and after cycloplegia. Changes in anterior segment parameters were compared among the three refractive groups. Results: Crystalline lens rise (CLR) and crystalline lens thickness (CLT) significantly decreased in all three refractive groups after cycloplegia (all p < 0.01). The anterior radius of lens (ARL) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) significantly increased in all three refractive groups after cycloplegia (all p < 0.01). Posterior radius of lens (PRL) significantly increased in hyperopic eyes after cycloplegia (p < 0.01) while it remained unchanged in emmetropic eyes and myopic eyes. Central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber width (ACW), lens decentration (LD), and lens tilt (LT) remained unchanged after cycloplegia in all three refractive groups (all p > 0.05). Changes in CLR, CLT, ARL, PRL, and ACD in hyperopic eyes were greater than those in emmetropic eyes and myopic eyes (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: Apart from various changes in anterior segment parameters after application by 0.5% tropicamide in all three refractive groups, significant changes in CLR, CLT, ARL, PRL, and ACD in hyperopic eyes should be noted for proper clinical interpretation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究巩膜内固定后人工晶状体(IOL)倾斜的球面移位。
    方法:我们回顾性回顾了在Jikei大学医院眼科接受经结膜25或27号平面玻璃体切割手术的法兰巩膜内人工晶状体固定术患者的病历。最短随访时间为3个月。使用第二代眼前节光学相干断层扫描(CASIA2;TOMEY)来获得巩膜内固定IOL的倾斜和偏心值以及术后前房深度。我们研究了屈光不正与各种参数之间的关系,如IOL倾斜和偏心,轴向长度,和角膜曲率测量。除了我们的临床调查,我们使用Zemax进行了光学模拟,通过透焦响应和等效球面屈光力的变化来评估IOL倾斜的球面偏移.
    结果:该研究涉及67例患者的72只眼。IOL倾斜程度与屈光不正量相关(Spearman等级相关系数[CC]=-0.32;P=0.006)。特别是,倾斜角度大于10°强烈影响屈光不正。术后前房深度也与屈光不正相关(CC=0.50;P<0.001),与分散相反(CC=-0.17;P=0.15),轴向长度(CC=-0.08;P=0.49),和角膜曲率(CC=-0.06;P=0.64)。光学模拟还显示了近视偏移,随着倾斜度的增加,近视偏移呈指数增加。
    结论:大于10°的IOL倾斜会导致屈光不正。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the spherical shift of intraocular lens (IOL) tilt after intrascleral fixation.
    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent flanged intrascleral IOL fixation with transconjunctival 25- or 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy at the Department of Ophthalmology of the Jikei University Hospital. The minimum follow-up duration was 3 months. Second-generation anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CASIA2; TOMEY) was used to obtain the values of tilt and decentration of the intrasclerally fixated IOL and postoperative anterior chamber depth. We investigated the relationship between refractive error and various parameters, such as IOL tilt and decentration, axial length, and keratometry. In addition to our clinical investigation, we conducted optical simulations using Zemax to evaluate the spherical shift of the IOL tilt by means of the through-focus response and change in spherical equivalent power.
    RESULTS: The study involved 72 eyes of 67 patients. The degree of IOL tilt was correlated with the amount of refractive error (Spearman\'s rank correlation coefficient [CC] = - 0.32; P = 0.006). In particular, a tilt angle greater than 10° strongly affected the refractive error. The postoperative anterior chamber depth also correlated with the refractive error (CC = 0.50; P < 0.001), as opposed to decentration (CC = - 0.17; P = 0.15), axial length (CC = - 0.08; P = 0.49), and keratometry (CC = - 0.06; P = 0.64). Optical simulations also revealed a myopic shift that exponentially increased as the tilt became greater.
    CONCLUSIONS: IOL tilts that are greater than 10° induce refractive error.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号