In human stroke, brain swelling is an important predictor of neurological outcome and mortality, yet treatments to reduce or prevent brain swelling are extremely limited, due in part to an inadequate understanding of mechanisms. In preclinical studies on cerebroprotection in animal models of stroke, historically, the focus has been on reducing infarct size, and in most studies, a reduction in infarct size has been associated with a corresponding reduction in brain swelling. Unfortunately, such findings on brain swelling have little translational value for treating brain swelling in patients with stroke. This is because, in humans, brain swelling usually becomes evident, either symptomatically or radiologically, days after the infarct size has stabilized, requiring that the prevention or treatment of brain swelling target mechanism(s) that are independent of a reduction in infarct size. In this problematizing review, we highlight the often-neglected concept that brain edema and brain swelling are not simply secondary, correlative phenomena of stroke but distinct pathological entities with unique molecular and cellular mechanisms that are worthy of direct targeting. We outline the advances in approaches for the study of brain swelling that are independent of a reduction in infarct size. Although straightforward, the approaches reviewed in this study have important translational relevance for identifying novel treatment targets for post-ischemic brain swelling.

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the risk of brain swelling during craniotomy between propofol-based and volatile-based anesthesia.
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Operating room.
Propofol-based anesthesia.
Adult patients undergoing craniotomy.
Databases, including EMBASE, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, were searched from inception to April 2023. The primary outcome was the risk of brain swelling, while the secondary outcomes included the impact of anesthetic regimens on surgical and recovery outcomes, as well as the risk of hemodynamic instability.
Our meta-analysis of 17 RCTs showed a significantly lower risk of brain swelling (risk ratio [RR]: 0.85, p = 0.03, I2 = 21%, n = 1976) in patients receiving propofol than in those using volatile agents, without significant differences in surgical time or blood loss between the two groups. Moreover, propofol was associated with a lower intracranial pressure (ICP) (mean difference: -4.06 mmHg, p < 0.00001, I2 = 44%, n = 409) as well as a lower risk of tachycardia (RR = 0.54, p = 0.005, I2 = 0%, n = 822) and postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV) (RR = 0.59, p = 0.002, I2 = 19%, n = 1382). There were no significant differences in other recovery outcomes (e.g., extubation time), risk of bradycardia, hypertension, or hypotension between the two groups. Subgroup analysis indicated that propofol was not associated with a reduced risk of brain swelling when compared to individual volatile agents. Stratified by craniotomy indications, propofol reduced brain swelling in elective craniotomy, but not in emergency craniotomy (e.g., traumatic brain injury), when compared to volatile anesthetics.
By reviewing the available evidence, our results demonstrate the beneficial effects of propofol on the risk of brain swelling, ICP, PONV, and intraoperative tachycardia. In emergency craniotomy for traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage, brain swelling showed no significant difference between propofol and volatile agents. Further large-scale studies are warranted for verification.

Brain swelling is a major cause of death and disability in ischemic stroke. Drugs of the gliflozin class, which target the Na+-coupled D-glucose cotransporter, SGLT2, are approved for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and may be beneficial in other conditions, but data in cerebral ischemia are limited. We studied murine models of cerebral ischemia with middle cerebral artery occlusion/reperfusion (MCAo/R). Slc5a2/SGLT2 mRNA and protein were upregulated de novo in astrocytes. Live cell imaging of brain slices from mice following MCAo/R showed that astrocytes responded to modest increases in D-glucose by increasing intracellular Na+ and cell volume (cytotoxic edema), both of which were inhibited by the SGLT2 inhibitor, canagliflozin. The effect of canagliflozin was studied in three mouse models of stroke: non-diabetic and T2DM mice with a moderate ischemic insult (MCAo/R, 1/24 h) and non-diabetic mice with a severe ischemic insult (MCAo/R, 2/24 h). Canagliflozin reduced infarct volumes in models with moderate but not severe ischemic insults. However, canagliflozin significantly reduced hemispheric swelling and improved neurological function in all models tested. The ability of canagliflozin to reduce brain swelling regardless of an effect on infarct size has important translational implications, especially in large ischemic strokes.

Cerebral malaria (CM) remains a significant global health challenge with high morbidity and mortality. Malarial retinopathy has been shown to be diagnostically and prognostically significant in the assessment of CM. The major mechanism of death in paediatric CM is brain swelling. Long term morbidity is typically characterised by neurological and neurodevelopmental sequelae. Optical coherence tomography can be used to quantify papilloedema and macular ischaemia, identified as hyperreflectivity. Here we describe a protocol to test the hypotheses that quantification of optic nerve head swelling using optical coherence tomography can identify severe brain swelling in CM, and that quantification of hyperreflectivity in the macula predicts neurodevelopmental outcomes post-recovery. Additionally, our protocol includes the development of a novel, low-cost, handheld optical coherence tomography machine and artificial intelligence tools to assist in image analysis.

While congenital heart disease is not uncommon, cyanotic congenital heart disease (CCHD) accounts for a minor fraction of them. However, when cyanosis is present, it usually indicates a severe or critical illness. Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is one of the common CCHDs, representing 7-10% of all congenital cardiac malformations. Double-outlet right ventricle (DORV) is another CCHD similar to the TOF and associated with decreased pulmonary flow, ventricular septal defect (VSD), and aorta receiving blood from both ventricles. Reduced oxygen arterial saturation and increased viscosity by polycythemia induce focal cerebral ischemia, often in the area supplied by the middle cerebral artery leading to brain abscess. Brain abscesses require craniotomy, which is a major surgery. These patients also often show features of sepsis and increased intracranial pressure. The presence of CCHD further complicates the situation, making perioperative management even more challenging. There are studies in the literature on the management of similar cases, and they report successful management in most of them. However, not all such cases need intensive postoperative management. We present four pediatric cases who had either TOF or DORV and had to undergo craniotomy for brain abscess or ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. We describe case management and highlight the critical features and cases that require prolonged postoperative critical care management.

No specific or adjunctive therapies exist to treat cerebral malaria (CM) as of date. CM is a neuropathological manifestation of the malaria infection in humans, caused by the hemoparasitic pathogen Plasmodium falciparum. Driven through a multitude of virulence factors, varied immune responses, variations in brain swelling with regard to the age of patients, parasite biomass, and parasite-typing, the essential pathogenetic mechanisms underlying clinical CM have remained elusive. However, a recent series of studies based on molecular, immunologic, and advanced neuroradiologic and machine-learning approaches have unraveled new trends and insights to better understand and focus on the key determinants of CM in humans. This could possibly be the beginning of the design of new and effective adjunctive therapies that may not be common or applicable to the entire malarious world, but that could, rather, be specific to the variations in the determinants of CM.

When a patient arrives in the emergency department following a stroke, a traumatic brain injury, or sudden cardiac arrest, there is no therapeutic drug available to help protect their jeopardized neurons. One crucial reason is that we have not identified the molecular mechanisms leading to electrical failure, neuronal swelling, and blood vessel constriction in newly injured gray matter. All three result from a process termed spreading depolarization (SD). Because we only partially understand SD, we lack molecular targets and biomarkers to help neurons survive after losing their blood flow and then undergoing recurrent SD.
In this review, we introduce SD as a single or recurring event, generated in gray matter following lost blood flow, which compromises the Na+/K+ pump. Electrical recovery from each SD event requires so much energy that neurons often die over minutes and hours following initial injury, independent of extracellular glutamate.
We discuss how SD has been investigated with various pitfalls in numerous experimental preparations, how overtaxing the Na+/K+ ATPase elicits SD. Elevated K+ or glutamate are unlikely natural activators of SD. We then turn to the properties of SD itself, focusing on its initiation and propagation as well as on computer modeling.
Finally, we summarize points of consensus and contention among the authors as well as where SD research may be heading. In an accompanying review, we critique the role of the glutamate excitotoxicity theory, how it has shaped SD research, and its questionable importance to the study of early brain injury as compared with SD theory.

Within 2 min of severe ischemia, spreading depolarization (SD) propagates like a wave through compromised gray matter of the higher brain. More SDs arise over hours in adjacent tissue, expanding the neuronal damage. This period represents a therapeutic window to inhibit SD and so reduce impending tissue injury. Yet most neuroscientists assume that the course of early brain injury can be explained by glutamate excitotoxicity, the concept that immediate glutamate release promotes early and downstream brain injury. There are many problems with glutamate release being the unseen culprit, the most practical being that the concept has yielded zero therapeutics over the past 30 years. But the basic science is also flawed, arising from dubious foundational observations beginning in the 1950s METHODS: Literature pertaining to excitotoxicity and to SD over the past 60 years is critiqued.
Excitotoxicity theory centers on the immediate and excessive release of glutamate with resulting neuronal hyperexcitation. This instigates poststroke cascades with subsequent secondary neuronal injury. By contrast, SD theory argues that although SD evokes some brief glutamate release, acute neuronal damage and the subsequent cascade of injury to neurons are elicited by the metabolic stress of SD, not by excessive glutamate release. The challenge we present here is to find new clinical targets based on more informed basic science. This is motivated by the continuing failure by neuroscientists and by industry to develop drugs that can reduce brain injury following ischemic stroke, traumatic brain injury, or sudden cardiac arrest. One important step is to recognize that SD plays a central role in promoting early neuronal damage. We argue that uncovering the molecular biology of SD initiation and propagation is essential because ischemic neurons are usually not acutely injured unless SD propagates through them. The role of glutamate excitotoxicity theory and how it has shaped SD research is then addressed, followed by a critique of its fading relevance to the study of brain injury.
Spreading depolarizations better account for the acute neuronal injury arising from brain ischemia than does the early and excessive release of glutamate.

This article reviews the scientific career and accomplishments of the late Dr. Saul Brusilow, Professor of Pediatrics at Johns Hopkins. Dr. Brusilow\'s career was focused on diseases involving hyperammonemia. He and his colleagues developed a set of drugs that could lower ammonia levels in patients with genetic disorders of the urea cycle by providing alternative pathways for the synthesis of excretable nitrogenous molecules. Those drugs and their derivatives represent one of the earliest and most successful drug therapies for genetic diseases. Turning their attention to brain swelling caused by liver disease, Dr. Brusilow and colleagues developed the Osmotic Gliopathy Hypothesis to help explain the mechanism of ammonia toxicity, postulating that high ammonia drives glutamine synthetase in astrocytes to produce elevated levels of glutamine that act as a potent osmolyte, drawing water into the cell and causing cerebral edema. This hypothesis suggests that inhibiting glutamine synthetase with its well-characterized inhibitor, methionine sulfoximine, might prove therapeutic in cases of hepatic encephalopathy, a conclusion supported by their subsequent studies in animals. But although the drugs developed to treat hyperammonemia resulting from urea cycle disorders were successfully developed and approved by the FDA, the compound suggested as a treatment for hepatic encephalopathy was unable to attract sufficient interest and investment to be tested for use in humans.

UNASSIGNED: Peritumoral brain edema is an uncommon but life-threatening side effect of brain tumors radiosurgery. Medical therapy usually alleviates symptoms until edema spontaneously disappears. However, when peritumoral brain edema endangers the patient\'s life or medical therapy fails to guarantee an acceptable quality of life, surgery might be considered.
UNASSIGNED: Our report focuses on three patients who developed extensive peritumoral brain edema after radiosurgery. Two were affected by vestibular schwannomas and one by a skull-base meningioma. Peritumoral brain edema worsened despite maximal medical therapy in all cases; therefore, surgical removal of the radiated lesion was carried out. In the first patient, surgery was overdue and resulted in a fatal outcome. On the other hand, in the latter two cases surgery was quickly effective. In all three cases, an unmanageable brain swelling was not found at surgery.
UNASSIGNED: Surgical removal of brain tumors previously treated with radiosurgery was safe and effective in resolving shortly peritumoral brain edema. This solution should be considered in patients who do not respond to medical therapy and before worsening of clinical conditions. Interestingly, the expected brain swelling was not confirmed intraoperatively. In our experience, this magnetic resonance finding should not be considered a criterion to delay surgery.