In human stroke, brain swelling is an important predictor of neurological outcome and mortality, yet treatments to reduce or prevent brain swelling are extremely limited, due in part to an inadequate understanding of mechanisms. In preclinical studies on cerebroprotection in animal models of stroke, historically, the focus has been on reducing infarct size, and in most studies, a reduction in infarct size has been associated with a corresponding reduction in brain swelling. Unfortunately, such findings on brain swelling have little translational value for treating brain swelling in patients with stroke. This is because, in humans, brain swelling usually becomes evident, either symptomatically or radiologically, days after the infarct size has stabilized, requiring that the prevention or treatment of brain swelling target mechanism(s) that are independent of a reduction in infarct size. In this problematizing review, we highlight the often-neglected concept that brain edema and brain swelling are not simply secondary, correlative phenomena of stroke but distinct pathological entities with unique molecular and cellular mechanisms that are worthy of direct targeting. We outline the advances in approaches for the study of brain swelling that are independent of a reduction in infarct size. Although straightforward, the approaches reviewed in this study have important translational relevance for identifying novel treatment targets for post-ischemic brain swelling.

UNASSIGNED: The use of drains, including suction drains in neurosurgery is individual preference-based, rather than scientific evidence-based. Furthermore, the use of suction drains has been associated with significant risks to patients, including sudden death.
UNASSIGNED: We present 2 cases of unfortunate sudden deaths following uneventful cranioplasty procedures, both of which were associated with the use of a suction drain. We also review the literature focusing on the benefits and risks in the use of suction drains, and discuss pathophysiological mechanisms underlying sudden death associated with their use.
UNASSIGNED: There is no substantial evidence to support the use of suction drains in neurosurgery. Furthermore, they have been associated with significant complications, including risk to life. Our experience and literature review suggest that the risk of sudden death is disproportionately higher following cranioplasty. We do not recommend the use of suction drains in cranial neurosurgery, and we strongly recommend against their use in cranioplasty procedures.

Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is frequently encountered in the neurosurgical setting. A multitude of tactics exists to reduce ICP, ranging from patient position and medications to cerebrospinal fluid diversion and surgical decompression. A vast amount of literature has been published regarding ICP management in the critical care setting, but studies specifically tailored toward the management of intraoperative acute increases in ICP or brain bulk are lacking. Compartmentalizing the intracranial space into blood, brain tissue, and cerebrospinal fluid and understanding the numerous techniques available to affect these individual compartments can guide the surgical team to quickly identify increased brain bulk and respond appropriately. Rapidly instituting measures for brain relaxation in the operating room is essential in optimizing patient outcomes. Knowledge of the efficacy, rapidity, feasibility, and risks of the various available interventions can aid the team to properly tailor their approach to each individual patient. In this article, we present the first evidence-based review of intraoperative management of ICP and brain bulk.

暂无摘要。