暂无摘要。

Neuropathologic changes of Alzheimer disease (AD) including Aβ accumulation and neuroinflammation are frequently observed in the cerebral cortex of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). We created an automated analysis platform to quantify Aβ load and reactive microglia in the vicinity of Aβ plaques and to evaluate their association with cognitive outcome in cortical biopsies of patients with iNPH obtained at the time of shunting. Aiforia Create deep learning software was used on whole slide images of Iba1/4G8 double immunostained frontal cortical biopsies of 120 shunted iNPH patients to identify Iba1-positive microglia somas and Aβ areas, respectively. Dementia, AD clinical syndrome (ACS), and Clinical Dementia Rating Global score (CDR-GS) were evaluated retrospectively after a median follow-up of 4.4 years. Deep learning artificial intelligence yielded excellent (>95%) precision for tissue, Aβ, and microglia somas. Using an age-adjusted model, higher Aβ coverage predicted the development of dementia, the diagnosis of ACS, and more severe memory impairment by CDR-GS whereas measured microglial densities and Aβ-related microglia did not correlate with cognitive outcome in these patients. Therefore, cognitive outcome seems to be hampered by higher Aβ coverage in cortical biopsies in shunted iNPH patients but is not correlated with densities of surrounding microglia.

Brain biopsies are often considered for patients who cannot be diagnosed with various laboratory test results. However, physicians tend to be hesitant regarding their application in possibly non-neoplastic brain diseases, due to the invasiveness and risks. The aim was to determine the indications for brain biopsies in cases of neurological diseases of unknown etiology. We retrospectively evaluated diagnostic accuracy, laboratory findings (including a liquid biopsy for malignant lymphoma), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics and the post-treatment outcomes of patients undergoing brain biopsies for neurological diseases of unknown etiology. The data of patients who had undergone a brain biopsy during their admission to Niigata University Hospital, between 2011 and 2024, were reviewed. Moreover, the laboratory data and MRI findings between patients with definitive and nonspecific biopsy diagnoses were compared. Twenty-six patients underwent a brain biopsy, and a definitive diagnosis was obtained in 14 patients (53.8%). Even in cases where a nonspecific diagnosis was made, biopsy findings helped rule out malignancy and guide clinical diagnosis and treatment decisions. The liquid biopsy for malignant lymphoma was performed in eight patients, with one yielding a positive result, consistent with primary central nervous system lymphoma. The sensitivity and specificity of liquid biopsy were 0.5 and 1, respectively. Diffusely contrasted cortical lesions and the presence of mass effects on MRI, were significantly associated with a definitive diagnosis, compared to a nonspecific diagnosis. In conclusion, brain MRI and liquid biopsies can assist in determining the appropriate indications for brain biopsies in neurological diseases of unknown etiology.

Listeria cerebritis is a rare yet serious central nervous system infection, which can present with leptomeningeal enhancement, abscess, and seizures. An adult patient with a history of metastatic melanoma presented with left-sided weakness, later identified as postictal Todd\'s paralysis due to focal motor seizures. Further diagnostic workup revealed a leptomeningeal abscess in the setting of listeria cerebritis. The patient\'s condition improved after treatment with a prolonged course of ampicillin, gentamicin, and linezolid over eight weeks. Leptomeningeal disease in patients with cancer history is often thought to be metastatic disease but infections, such as listeria, should be considered even if cerebrospinal fluid is bland. Treatment of listeria may need to be prolonged in patients who are immunocompromised.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative management following elective cranial surgery, particularly after biopsy procedures, varies significantly across neurosurgical centres. Routine postoperative head CT scans, traditionally performed to detect complications such as intracranial bleeding or cerebral oedema, lack substantial evidence supporting their necessity.
METHODS: This study is a retrospective cohort analysis conducted at a regional neurosurgical department of 236 patients who underwent brain biopsies between 2018 and 2022. Patient data, including demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes, were collected and analysed. The outcomes investigated were the incidence and impact of postoperative CT scans on time to discharge, management changes, and the influence of preoperative anticoagulation.
RESULTS: Out of 236 patients, 205 (86.86%) underwent postoperative CT scans. There was no significant relationship between postoperative hematoma, as detected on a CT scan, and neurological deficit (p = 0.443), or between preoperative anticoagulation and postoperative bleeding on CT scans (p = 0.464). Patients who had postoperative CT scans had a significantly longer length of stay (LOS) compared to those who did not (p < 0.001). Intraoperative bleeding was a predictor of hematoma on postoperative CT (p = 0.017) but not of postoperative neurological deficit. The routine postoperative CT scan showed limited predictive value for symptomatic deficits, with a positive predictive value of 6.67% and a negative predictive value of 96.88%.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine postoperative CT scans after brain biopsies do not significantly impact management or improve patient outcomes but are associated with longer hospital stays. CT scans should be reserved for patients showing clinical signs of complications rather than used as a routine procedure after a brain biopsy.

Diagnosis of intracranial tuberculoma remains a challenge due to its rarity, non-specific clinical presentation, and radiological findings. Herein, we describe a case of intracranial tuberculomas in a male diabetic patient who presented headache and vomiting on admission. Neuroimaging findings indicated multiple ring contrast-enhanced lesions with extensive perilesional edema. However, a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination was normal. When a biopsy of brain lesions was performed, pathological characteristics of tuberculosis were absent and acid-fast staining was negative. A tuberculosis diagnosis was subsequently obtained from an Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded brain tissue. The patient was treated with an optimized anti-tuberculosis regimen which included high-dose intravenous administration of rifampicin and isoniazid, and oral administration of linezolid. The patient recovered well and exhibited marked clinical improvement. This case report demonstrates that when CSF analysis does not indicate the presence of intracranial tuberculomas, analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded brain tissue specimens with the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay may be able to confirm a diagnosis. Furthermore, a high dose of rifampicin and isoniazid plus linezolid may improve patient outcome.

BACKGROUND: Isolated tumefactive demyelinating lesions (≥2 cm) may be difficult to distinguish from contrast-enhancing brain tumors, central nervous system infections, and (rarely) tissue dysgenesis, which may all occur with increased signal on T2-weighted images. Establishing an accurate diagnosis is essential for management, and we delineate our single-center experience.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of medical records, imaging, and biopsy specimens for patients under 18 years presenting with isolated tumefactive demyelination over a 10-year period.
RESULTS: Ten children (eight female) met inclusion criteria, with a median age of 14.1 years. Lesions were most likely to involve the thalamus (six of 10), brainstem (five of 10), basal ganglia (four of 10), or corpus callosum (four of 10). Eighty percent had perilesional edema at presentation, and 60% had midline shift. Biopsies demonstrated demyelination with perivascular lymphocytic infiltration and axonal damage ranging from mild to severe. All patients were initially treated with high-dose corticosteroids, and eight of 10 required additional medical therapies such as intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, cyclophosphamide, or rituximab. Increased intracranial pressure was managed aggressively with two of 10 patients requiring decompressive craniectomies. Clinical outcomes varied.
CONCLUSIONS: Solitary tumefactive demyelinating lesions are rare, and aggressive management of inflammation and increased intracranial pressure is essential. Biopsy is helpful to evaluate for other diagnoses on the differential and maximize therapies. Treatment beyond initial therapy with corticosteroids is often required. Isolated tumefactive demyelinating lesions are uncommon; multicenter natural history studies are needed to better delineate differential diagnoses and optimal therapies.

OBJECTIVE: Obtaining a definitive pathological diagnosis from brain tissue sampling was challenging due to the small, non-representative sample. This study introduced a novel syringe technique for brain biopsy aimed at enhancing diagnostic accuracy by obtaining core tissue samples that better represent the targeted tissue.
METHODS: The ten patients with atypical brain lesions underwent the syringe biopsy. After meticulous preoperative planning with neuronavigation, a minimally invasive approach was used: a 3 cm skin incision and a 14 mm burr hole were created. A modified 3-cc syringe was used to create negative pressure and cannulate the brain tissue. The desired sample size (24 cm³) was obtained by controlling the syringe depth and withdrawal. Medical records were reviewed to assess sample analysis results and any complications RESULTS: The syringe technique successfully yielded adequate tissue samples in 9 out of 10 patients. In one case, the desired tissue could not be retrieved and required a microsurgical approach for removal. In all ten cases, a correct diagnosis was made without significant complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary findings suggest that the syringe technique is both safe and effective for obtaining substantial volumes of brain tissue, facilitating accurate pathological evaluation in cases of complex neurological disorders.

Primary angiitis of the central nervous system (CNS) is an uncommon inflammatory disorder, with highly variable clinical presentation. It needs to be differentiated from several mimickers, such as CNS involvement in systemic vasculitides, connective tissue disorders, infectious disease, and leukodystrophy as well as neoplastic diseases. The diagnosis requires a combination of clinical and laboratory investigations, multimodal imaging, and histopathological examination, which should be available for confirmation. In the present paper, the histopathological features of primary angiitis of the CNS are described and highlighted to help pathologists avoid misdiagnosis of a treatable acquired disease.

Medical autopsies have decreased in frequency due in part to advances in radiological techniques and increased availability of molecular and other ancillary testing. However, premortem diagnosis of CNS disease remains challenging; while ∼90% of brain tumor biopsies are diagnostic, only 20%-70% of biopsies for presumed nonneoplastic disease result in a specific diagnosis. The added benefits of performing an autopsy following surgical brain biopsy are not well defined. A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who underwent brain biopsy and autopsy at Brigham and Women\'s Hospital from 2003 to 2022. A total of 135 cases were identified, including 95 (70%) patients with primary CNS neoplasms, 16 (12%) with metastatic tumors, and 24 (18%) with nonneoplastic neurological disease. Diagnostic concordance between biopsy and autopsy diagnosis was excellent both for primary CNS neoplasms (98%) and metastatic tumors (94%). Conversely, patients with nonneoplastic disease received definitive premortem diagnoses in 7/24 (29%) cases. Five (21%) additional patients received conclusive diagnoses following autopsy; 8 (33%) received a more specific differential diagnosis compared to the biopsy. Overall, autopsy confirmed premortem diagnoses or provided new diagnostic information in 131/135 (97%) cases, highlighting the value in performing postmortem brain examination in patients with both neoplastic and nonneoplastic diseases.