OBJECTIVE: A novel automated auscultatory upper arm cuff blood pressure (BP) monitor KOROT V2 Doctor (InBody BPBIO280KV) was developed for professional use. An electronic stethoscope embedded in the device cuff records the Korotkoff sounds, which are graphically displayed during deflation allowing visual evaluation by the healthcare professional. The device provides automated measurements of BP and this study evaluated its accuracy.
METHODS: The requirements of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) and its Amendment 1.2020-01 were applied. Participants were recruited to fulfill the age, sex, BP, arm circumference, and cuff distribution criteria of the Universal Standard and its Amendment in a general population using the same arm sequential measurement method. Three cuffs of the test device were tested for arm circumference 23-28, 28-35, and 33-42 cm.
RESULTS: Data from 85 individuals were analyzed [mean age: 56.4 ± 16.0 (SD) years, 50 men, arm circumference 23-42 cm]. For validation Criterion 1, the mean difference ±SD between the test device and reference BP readings (N = 255) was -1.3 ± 6.0/1.5 ± 5.0 mmHg (systolic/diastolic; threshold ≤5 ± 8 mmHg). For Criterion 2, the SD of the averaged BP differences per individual (N = 85) was 4.61/3.48 mmHg (systolic/diastolic; threshold ≤6.82/6.78 mmHg).
CONCLUSIONS: The KOROT V2 Doctor (InBody BPBIO280KV) device for professional use, which provides automated auscultatory measurements with visual display of the Korotkoff sounds, comfortably fulfills all the requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) in a general population and can be recommended for clinical use.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the accuracy of the OMRON HEM-7361T automated oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitor in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm.
METHODS: An approximately equal number of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and individuals with sinus rhythm were recruited from outpatients and inpatients of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China. BP was measured three times consecutively with a 30-s interval with the OMRON HEM-7361T automatic electronic BP monitor for atrial fibrillation detection. A hand-held single lead electrocardiogram device was used for simultaneous electrocardiogram recordings.
RESULTS: The device accurately identified atrial fibrillation in 100 (99.0%) of the 101 patients, with only 1 patient incorrectly classified as non-atrial fibrillation. The device correctly identified 99 (95.2%) of the 104 participants with sinus rhythm as non-atrial fibrillation, with five participants incorrectly classified as atrial fibrillation. The device had a positive predictive value of 95.2%, negative predictive value of 99.0%, and overall accuracy of 97.1%. Among the six misclassified participants, one with atrial fibrillation had a heart rate of 65 beats/min, and four of the five participants with sinus rhythm had cardiac arrhythmias (atrial or ventricular premature beat in one participants, sinus tachycardia in one participant, and both arrhythmias in one participant).
CONCLUSIONS: The OMRON HEM-7361T BP monitor is accurate in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm. Whether the device is sufficiently accurate in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and other cardiac arrhythmias remains under investigation.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine factors associated with changes in adherence to hypertension management (medication adherence and blood pressure control) in respondents with hypertension before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bogor city, Indonesia.
METHODS: An observational study was conducted using two sources of data (before and during COVID-19 pandemic). Data before the pandemic were derived from the 2019 Cohort Study of non-communicable disease risk factors. Data during the pandemic were derived from an online survey conducted in September and October 2020. Information from 880 participants were analyzed. The dependent variable was the change in adherence to hypertension management before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic polynomial regression.
RESULTS: Respondents who adhered to hypertension management decreased from 82.0% in 2019 to 47.8% in 2020. The likelihood of non-adherence (respondents who did not adhere to hypertension management both before and during the pandemic) increased in respondents below 55 years old, who did not own any healthcare insurance, who were not obese, and who had no other comorbidities. In the partial adherence group (respondents who did not adhere to hypertension management either before or during the pandemic), we found that most respondents adhered before the pandemic but no longer adhered during the COVID-19 pandemic. We found an increased partial adherence in young and highly educated respondents.
CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to improve adherence to hypertension management after the COVID-19 pandemic should target those who were young, highly educated, who did not have any healthcare insurance, and who did not perceive themselves as not having comorbidities.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the single upper-arm cuff oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitor RBP-9801 developed for office and home BP measurement in the general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018). Subjects were recruited to fulfil the age, gender, BP and cuff distribution criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard in general population using the same arm sequential BP measurement method. A total of 105 subjects were recruited and 85 were analyzed. For validation criterion 1, the mean ± SD of the differences between the test device and reference BP readings was 2.3 ± 6.4/3.1 ± 5.8 mmHg (systolic/diastolic). For criterion 2, the SD of the mean BP differences between the test device and reference BP per subject was 5.24/5.03 mmHg (systolic/diastolic). The conclusion is that the RBP-9801 oscillometric device for office and home BP measurement fulfilled all the requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) in the general population and can be recommended for clinic and self-use at home.

UNASSIGNED: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is often asymptomatic and undiagnosed. As AF and hypertension often coexist, opportunistic AF detection during routine automated blood pressure (BP) measurement appears to be an attractive screening method.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies assessing the diagnostic test accuracy of office, home, or 24-hour ambulatory BP measuring devices with AF detection algorithms versus reference electrocardiography. Analyses were performed per participant (AF status based on several BP readings; most office/home devices) or per reading (AF status based on individual readings; all ambulatory devices). A meta-analysis stratified by device type (office/home/ambulatory) was conducted to calculate pooled measures of diagnostic accuracy. Sensitivity/meta-regression analyses were also performed.
UNASSIGNED: Among 3096 records initially retrieved, 23 diagnostic test accuracy studies were included. Data derived from 11 093 individuals (weighted age 69 years, males 56%, hypertensives 79%, diabetics 24%, and AF prevalence 17%) indicated a pooled sensitivity 0.97 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99), specificity 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.95), and accuracy 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.95), with generally consistent results using office, home, or ambulatory BP devices (slightly lower specificity with the latter). The positive and negative predictive values were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.60-0.80) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00), respectively. Sensitivity analyses indicated lower specificity in studies implementing reading versus participant analyses. Most studies presented a low risk of bias and minor applicability concerns.
UNASSIGNED: There is considerable and consistent evidence suggesting high diagnostic accuracy of AF detection algorithms implemented in automated BP monitors during routine BP measurements in and out of the office. AF diagnosis requires verification (electrocardiography) before treatment is administered.

UNASSIGNED: Some brachial cuffs for oscillometric blood pressure (BP) measurement are claimed to cover a wide range of upper-arm circumferences; however, their validation is rarely conducted. Our aim was to compare oscillometric BP measurements obtained with a universal cuff with those obtained with an appropriately sized cuff.
UNASSIGNED: We utilised the Microlife B6 Connect monitor, conducting oscillometric BP measurements in a random sequence with both a universal cuff (recommended for arm circumferences from 22 to 42 cm) and an appropriately sized cuff (medium for circumference 22-32 cm and large for 32-42 cm). We included 91 individuals with an arm circumference of 22-32 cm and 64 individuals with an arm circumference of 32-42 cm.
UNASSIGNED: For arm circumferences > 32 cm, systolic and diastolic BP measured with the universal cuff was higher than that measured with the large cuff (systolic 6.4 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI]). 3.9-8.8, diastolic 2.4 mmHg, 95%CI, 1.2-3.7, p < 0.001 for both). Overestimation of BP with the universal cuff was statistically significant after correcting for the sequence of measurements. No statistical difference was found between the universal cuff and medium cuff for circumferences in the 22-32 cm range. The bladder size in the universal cuff matched the dimensions of the medium-sized cuff; however, the cuff was larger.
UNASSIGNED: Overestimation of BP measured with a universal cuff in persons with large arm circumferences is clinically important. It poses the risk of unnecessary initiation or intensification of antihypertensive medication in persons using the universal cuff.
What is the context?Clinical guidelines recommend individualisation of the size of the cuff used for blood pressure measurement according to the circumference of the upper arm.Many blood pressure monitors are sold with a single “universal” cuff claimed to cover a wide range of upper arm sizes.We compared blood pressure obtained with the Microlife B6 Connect monitor and a “universal” cuff with the results obtained with individual sized cuffs (medium size for arm circumference between 22 and 32 cm and large size for arm circumference between 32 and 42 cm).What is new?In persons with large upper arm circumference is the systolic blood pressure 6.4 mmHg higher and the diastolic blood pressure 2.4 mmHg higher with the universal cuff than with the individual-sized large cuff.What is the impact?The universal cuff overestimates blood pressure in persons with large arm circumference.

We aimed to validate the accuracy of the Mindray VS9 Vital Signs Monitor, which features the Mindray TrueBP inflation algorithm for oscillometric blood pressure (BP) measurement, to check if it complies with the International Organization for Standardization Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) in a combined adult and pediatric population. A total of 86 participants, including both adult and pediatric subjects, were recruited. The distribution of their ages, gender, BPs and limb sizes all complied with the requirement of the ISO standard. The inflation and deflation algorithms were validated independently using the same-arm sequential BP measurement method. For each subject, the BP was first determined by two independent observers using a mercury sphygmomanometer (R1). The BP of the subject was then determined by the third observer using the test equipment (T1). Then, using a mercury sphygmomanometer, two independent observers were asked to determine the subject\'s BP (R2) again. R1-T1-R2 were considered a valid pair of data. This cycle continued until 3 pairs of valid data were achieved. We collected 258 pairs of valid BP data for the validation of the inflation and deflation algorithms respectively. For validation Criterion 1, the mean ± SD of the differences between the readings obtained from the test device and reference BP was 0.0 ± 6.6/-1.8 ± 7.1 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) when the deflation algorithm was used, and 2.4 ± 6.3/ 0.3 ± 6.9 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) when the inflation algorithm was used. For validation Criterion 2, the SD of the averaged BP differences between the test device and the reference BP per subject was 5.35/6.33 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) when the deflation algorithm was used, and 5.17/5.75 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) when the inflation algorithm was used. The VS9 Vital Signs Monitor fulfilled all the criteria in the ISO Standard. Moreover, the inflation algorithm had a shorter Measure Time (by 7-21 s) and lower maximum inflation pressure (by 9.7-22 mmHg). The VS9 Vital Signs Monitor fulfilled all the requirements of the ISO Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) in a combined adult and pediatric population and is recommended for clinical use.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the noninvasive blood pressure monitoring function of the EDAN elite V5 patient monitor with reference invasive blood pressure monitoring equipment for clinical use in adults, adolescents or children according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 81060-2:2018 standard.
METHODS: Patients were recruited, and the ipsilateral sequential method was used for blood pressure measurement according to the standard. The validation results were assessed following the protocol and the Bland-Altman scatterplot was used to show the difference between the test device and reference invasive blood pressure results.
RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were included in the study, with 35 and 36 patients for each iFAST and iCUFS mode, respectively. The validation results showed an average device-reference difference of -3.27 ± 5.60 mmHg for SBP and -0.09 ± 6.10 mmHg for DBP for the iFAST mode, and -2.04 ± 5.55 mmHg for SBP and -0.79 ± 5.86 mmHg for DBP for the iCUFS mode, respectively, which passed the criteria of the ISO 81060-2 : 2018 in adults, adolescents or children population for both SBP and DBP.
CONCLUSIONS: The noninvasive blood pressure monitoring function of the EDAN elite V5 patient monitor passed all the requirements of ISO 81060-2:2018 and can be recommended for clinical use in adults, adolescents, or children.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of the KOROT P3 Accurate (previously InBody BPBIO480KV) monitor, an automated auscultatory blood pressure (BP) measuring device developed for professional use, in people with extra-large arms according to the ISO81060-2 2018 protocol.
METHODS: The KOROT P3 Accurate was tested in 37 subjects with upper-arm circumference ranging from >42 to 53 cm using a mercury sphygmomanometer coupled to a 20 × 40 cm tronco-conical cuff as the reference standard.
RESULTS: The mean BP difference between the device and the observers\' reference measurements was 1.2 ± 2.0 mmHg for systolic BP and 1.0 ± 2.0 mmHg for diastolic BP. These data were in agreement with criterion 1 of the protocol standard requirements (≤5 ± 8 mmHg). Also criterion 2 was satisfied being the standard deviations ± 1.7 mmHg for systolic BP and ± 1.6 for diastolic BP, well below the maximum values required by the protocol (±6.84/6.87 mmHg). Scatterplots of device-reference systolic and diastolic BP differences showed similar accuracy across the range of participants\' BP, arm circumference and upper-arm slant angle.
CONCLUSIONS: These data show that the KOROT P3 Accurate monitor satisfied the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard requirements in a special population of people with extra-large arms ranging from >42 to 53 cm.