BACKGROUND: Factor (F) XI deficiency is an inherited bleeding disorder with increased prevalence in Ashkenazi Jews where it is mainly caused by two variants, p.Glu135* (type II, leading to a null allele) and p.Phe301Leu (type III, missense variant). Inhibitor development is rare, and only seen in severe FXI deficiency (<20 IU/dL) upon exposure to plasma-based products. We report our experience of a large cohort of patients with severe FXI deficiency, including seven patients who developed FXI alloinhibitors, their presentation, natural history and subsequent perioperative management.
METHODS: A single-centre retrospective database review of patients with FXI deficiency, including those who have subsequently developed inhibitors, and extraction of clinical, laboratory and genotype data, including operative management records.
RESULTS: A total of 682 patients were identified with FXI deficiency, of whom 113 had FXI < 20 IU/dL and 42 had FXI ≤ 1 IU/dL. Factor XI inhibitors were seen in seven patients, six of whom were homozygous for the type II variant (prevalence of inhibitor with this genotype of 30%, risk of inhibitor upon plasma exposure 50%). FXI inhibitors were not seen, despite similar exposures, in patients with other genotypes. No alteration in bleeding phenotype occurred after inhibitor development and subsequent surgery was managed on 13 occasions with recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), including low doses (15-30 µg/kg), with good haemostasis. The inhibitor spontaneously disappeared in four of seven patients over 1-22 years.
CONCLUSIONS: FXI inhibitors were only observed in severe FXI deficient patients homozygous for p.Glu135* (null allele) upon plasma or FXI concentrate exposure, with a 30% prevalence. The bleeding phenotype was not altered and inhibitors may disappear with time. Adequate haemostasis in the perioperative setting is achievable with low doses of rFVIIa.

BACKGROUND: Factor (F)VIII inhibitors are measured using labor- and resource-expensive Nijmegen or Bethesda assays, which lack sensitivity for low-titer inhibitors and show high variations in quality surveys, mainly because of manual assay procedures.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was the development of a fast and fully automated FVIII inhibitor assay by using recombinant (r)FVIII as substrate and dedicated equipment for execution of the test.
METHODS: A new rapid, fully automated, FVIII inhibitor assay is presented, the core of which is use of full-length recombinant FVIII (rFVIII; Kovaltry, Bayer) as inhibitor substrate instead of plasma FVIII, resulting in rapid binding of inhibitors to rFVIII due to absence of von Willebrand factor. Dramatic shortening of incubation time facilitated full automation on an analyzer capable of 3 subsequent sample dilution steps and 3 reagent additions. Equal volume mixtures of sample and rFVIII (1.0 U/mL) were incubated for 10 minutes at 37 °C, whereafter remaining FVIII activity was analyzed with a kinetic chromogenic assay, allowing inhibitor activity calculation without preceding FVIII activity calibration, using a Ceveron s100 analyzer (Technoclone).
RESULTS: Mean titer in 60 nonhemophiliacs was 0.0 BU/mL (SD, 0.1), yielding a limit of blank of 0.1 BU/mL and lower limit of quantification of 0.2 BU/mL. Analyses were performed with the new method and a Nijmegen assay in 28 inhibitor-positive clinical samples, 14 containing emicizumab and 14 without. Correlation coefficient in emicizumab-free type I inhibitor samples was 1.0. Emicizumab dependency of the method was excluded in spiking experiments with inhibitor-positive samples. Reproducibility was tested by analyzing 7 samples in 3 laboratories for 5 days, twice daily; coefficients of variation of all samples were <15%.
CONCLUSIONS: We present development data of a sensitive and specific rapid, automated FVIII inhibitor assay generating results within 20 minutes that is less resource-intensive than standard assays with potential to improve assay variability.

BACKGROUND: Hemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked inherited bleeding disorder caused by reduced factor VIII (FVIII) levels. Approximately 10-15% of patients with severe HA (SHA) do not present with the anticipated bleeding pattern. Here, we assessed the phenotypic severity of hemophilia A using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and activated partial thromboplastin time-clot waveform analysis (APTT-CWA).
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with hemophilia A were enrolled. Clinical phenotype assignment was performed according to the published literature, and patients were classified into four phenotypic subgroups. The whole blood sample was first run on ROTEM in INTEM mode using platelet-poor plasma, APTT was run, and the APTT-CWA graph was simultaneously recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were recruited for this study. Statistically significant differences were observed between the four phenotypically categorized groups using ROTEM and APTT-CWA. On comparing patients with mild/moderate-to-severe phenotypes (Group II) with SHA without inhibitors (Group IV), no significant difference was found for all parameters of ROTEM or APTT-CWA. The MCF, MA30, MAXV, and Alpha angle values using ROTEM were found to be the lowest in patients with SHA with inhibitors, which helped differentiate them from those with SHA without inhibitors. However, these two groups could not be differentiated using the APTT-CWA parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: ROTEM can be used to distinguish patients with SHA with inhibitors from those with SHA without inhibitors using a combination of parameters with high sensitivity and specificity. However, APTT-CWA cannot be used to differentiate these patient groups.

Factor VIII replacement is the mainstay of treatment in hemophilia A but may lead to the development of inhibitors. While a vexing clinical problem, some observations suggest that the presence of inhibitors may not necessarily portend a higher bleeding risk. Our aim was to assess the prevalence and clinicopathological correlates of inhibitors in a well characterized cohort of Indian patients with HA patients. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical details and laboratory findings of consecutive hemophilia A patients attending a north-Indian tertiary-care center from 2010 to 2020. Among 592 patients with HA, inhibitors were detected in 35 patients (5.9%). Prevalence of inhibitors in moderate and severe hemophilia was 4.2% and 6.7%, respectively. Most patients with inhibitors had history of transfusion with factor VIII alone (54.3%) or a combination of factor VIII concentrate and other blood-products (42.9%). Intracranial bleed was significantly more frequent in patients with inhibitors compared to those without inhibitors (20% vs. 4.1%; p-0.001). Time dependent and immediately acting inhibitors were seen in 60% and 40% patients, respectively. High-titre (> 5 BU) and low-titre inhibitors (< 5 BU) were detected in 28 (80%) and 7 (20%) patients, respectively. Prevalence of inhibitors in our cohort was 5.9% and most had high-titre, time dependent inhibitors. These patients may have a higher risk of intracranial bleeding.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare autoimmune bleeding disorder due to the presence of neutralizing autoantibodies directed against the coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The reference method to detect and quantify anti-FVIII antibodies is the Bethesda assay (BA), but it presents some limitations such as a lack of sensitivity for low titers of inhibitor and the need for experienced laboratory. A commercially available ELISA detecting anti-FVIII antibodies has demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity. The aim of our study was to assess the performance of this ELISA for the detection of anti-FVIII IgG in AHA patients during the follow-up. In total, 11 acquired hemophilia A patients were recruited, and anti-FVIII antibody levels were monitored by BA and ELISA. Anti-FVIII IgG ELISA showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity, and it correlated with the BA. Discrepancies observed in 13.3% of cases were consistent with patients\' biological evolution. All these data suggest the possible use of anti-FVIII IgG ELISA for both diagnosis and follow-up of AHA patients.

Introduction: Type 3 Von Willebrand Disease (VWD) is the least common but the most severe form of a disease, with a prevalence of about 0. 5 to 1 per million in Western countries. The prevalence of type 3 VWD in the developing countries, with a high degree of consanguinity, is about 6 per million. Moreover, due to underdiagnosis of the milder cases, the prevalence of type 3 VWD is about 50% of the cases. Rarely, some patients develop the Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) inhibitors, which may subsequently develop severe anaphylactic reactions on further exposure to the VWF containing factor replacement therapy. The prevalence of inhibitor development in patients with type 3 VWD has been shown to be in the range of 5.8 to 9.5%. In the absence of a gold standard assay for the quantitation of VWF inhibitors, a correct diagnosis and management of these patients are often challenging. Objectives: The objective of this study is to standardize the Bethesda assay for the VWF inhibitors and to estimate the VWD inhibitor titer in two cases of congenital type 3 VWD, which developed the VWF inhibitors. Results and Conclusions: We could successfully standardize the Bethesda assay for the quantitation of VWF inhibitors in two patients with congenital type 3 VWD with inhibitors.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used to treat several conditions such as non-valvular atrial fibrillation, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism. DOACs and other anticoagulants block crucial steps in the coagulation cascade and ultimately prevent clot formation. Generally, individuals initiated on an anticoagulant are predisposed to or have a propensity to form clots. Patients with hemophilia are given anticoagulants only in very rare cases. In this report, we discuss the case of a 75-year-old man with a history of atrial fibrillation managed on rivaroxaban; he presented to the emergency department with fatigue, easy bleeding, symptomatic anemia, and significantly elevated partial thromboplastin time (PTT) with an undiagnosed acquired factor VIII inhibitor. Reports of DOAC use and concomitant factor inhibitor autoimmunization, as seen in this case, are scarcely explored in the existing literature. While DOACs are popular anticoagulants, their variable effects on both prothrombin time (PT) and PTT make it difficult to detect superimposed bleeding disorders. In patients with severe anemia or significant elevations in PT or PTT, an expedited workup, including factor assays, may be a reasonable option as evidenced by this case.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a potentially life-threatening bleeding disorder caused by factor VIII (FVIII) autoantibodies, involving various immunoglobulin (Ig) isotypes and IgG subclasses.
We analyzed the profile of Ig against FVIII in patients with AHA to identify Ig patterns predictive of bleeding phenotype and outcomes.
Ig detection and titration were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at disease presentation in a cohort of 66 subjects from the Quebec Reference Centre for Inhibitors registry.
Most of plasma samples analyzed (97%) contained multiple anti-FVIII Ig isotypes and IgG subclasses, IgG(1,2,3,4) (24.2%), [IgG(1,2,3,4),IgA] (16.7%) and IgG(2.4) (13.6%) being the most prevalent combinations of Ig detected. AHA patients who presented with IgA antibodies were more likely to have an associated auto-immune disease (p = .049). The presence of IgG4-was associated with bleeding symptoms at presentation (p = .002). IgG1-positive patients were more likely to require transfusions with red packed cell (p = .014) whereas IgM detection was associated with a higher probability of death linked to AHA (p = .011).
The Ig pattern of AHA patients at diagnosis is widely heterogeneous and is at least partially associated with some underlying conditions. Our data supports the differential predictive significance for IgG1, IgG4 and IgM on bleeding severity and suggests that the early determination of Ig profile may help to identify AHA patients at higher risk of poorer outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Laboratory monitoring for factor VIII inhibitors ideally requires samples with the lowest possible factor VIII (FVIII) level, potentially challenging in patients with congenital haemophilia A (CHA) receiving regular prophylaxis and acquired haemophilia A (AHA) patients with endogenous FVIII. Inactivation of FVIII by preheating (preheat treatment, PHT) of patient plasma has been suggested to facilitate monitoring.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical utility of PHT prior to inhibitor analysis by modified Nijmegen-Bethesda assay (mNBA) in patients with CHA and AHA.
METHODS: Inhibitor screening by mNBA under standard conditions and with PHT at 56°C for 30, 60 and 90 minutes was evaluated. FVIII inhibitor results between 2007 and 2010 without PHT (720 results from 222 CHA and AHA patients), and between 2011 and 2014 post-PHT (1102 results from 302 patients) were available for analysis.
RESULTS: Of total 1822 results available, 61% were from severe HA patients, 22% from mild and moderate HA and 16% from AHA. Pre-PHT, 74% of samples were analysed by the mNBA, and the remaining 26% were not tested as FVIII levels were >20 IU/dL as per local protocol. Postintroduction of PHT (90 and 60 minutes), 96% of samples received were analysed for an inhibitor. Post-PHT in patients with AHA (n = 26), 69% of samples tested with factor VIII levels >20 IU/dL were found to have detectable inhibitor.
CONCLUSIONS: FVIII inhibitor testing using PHT at 56°C for 60 minutes facilitates inhibitor surveillance of CHA on prophylaxis. Potentially, 30 minutes at 56°C might be equally efficacious. In AHA receiving immunosuppression, monitoring of inhibitor titre after initial factor VIII response might enable personalized immunosuppression.

暂无摘要。