Balloon dilatation

球囊扩张
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    气管狭窄是气管插管或气管切开的常见并发症,导致显著的发病率和死亡率。已提出支气管镜干预措施作为治疗插管后气管狭窄(PITS)的安全替代方法。两家医院诊断为PITS的患者数据,在2021年至2022年之间,包括人口统计,临床,程序细节是从电子病历中收集的,并分析。主要结果集中在通过支气管镜检查和放射成像评估PITS的发生率和严重程度。以及支气管镜干预的功效,包括支架置入和丝裂霉素C的应用。12例患者接受了PITS治疗。大多数患者为女性(9/12),平均年龄为46.41岁。出现的体征和症状是呼吸困难,rhonchi和失败的拔管,插管/气管造口术的平均持续时间为16.41天(范围:3-40天)。最常见的合并症是2型糖尿病,(5名患者,41.6%)。病变平均长度为3.09cm,Cotton-Meyer等级为II级和III级。及时评估至关重要,在这些患者中。Cotton-Meyer等级在治疗决策中至关重要,插管时间与狭窄疾病的严重程度有关。我们的病例系列证明了支气管镜检查在处理这些病例中的应用越来越广泛。
    Tracheal stenosis is a common complication of endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Bronchoscope interventions have been proposed as a safe alternative for the management of post-intubation post-intubation tracheal stenosis (PITS). Data for patients diagnosed with PITS across two hospitals, between 2021 and 2022, encompassing demographic, clinical, and procedural details were gathered from electronic medical records, and analysed. Primary outcomes centred on assessing the incidence and severity of PITS through bronchoscope examination and radiological imaging, and the efficacy of bronchoscope interventions, including stenting and the application of mitomycin C. Twelve patients were managed for PITS. Majority of patients were females (9/12) with mean age of 46.41 years. Presenting signs and symptoms were dyspnea, rhonchi and failed extubation, the mean duration of intubation/ tracheostomy is 16.41 days (range: 3-40 days). Most common comorbidity was type 2 diabetes, (5 patients, 41.6%). The lesions mean length was 3.09 cm and Cotton-Meyer Grade II and III. Prompt evaluation is crucial, in these patients. The Cotton-Meyer grade is pivotal in treatment decisions, with intubating times correlating with the severity of stenotic disease. Our case series demonstrates the increasing utility of bronchoscopy in managing these cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    IMPELLA5.5(AbiomedInc.,丹弗斯,马萨诸塞州,美国)是基于导管的,微型轴向血泵,旨在增强心源性休克患者的器官灌注。尽管其优越的血流动力学支持,血管并发症是一个重要的问题,许多患者由于这些问题需要停止IMPELLA治疗。患者甚至可能需要手术干预来解决与设备相关的血管损伤。IMPELLA5.5植入严重钙化的血管特别与血管钙化等并发症相关,狭窄,血管弯曲,血管内治疗和IMPELLA植入术后,使用较大的护套是危险因素.在这份报告中,我们介绍了一个右锁骨下动脉严重钙化的病例,其中提出了IMPELLA5.5。钙化突出到血管腔内,卡在IMPELLA电机和套管之间,复杂的提取,尽管血管具有足够的直径。我们使用球囊扩张技术成功地移除了设备,确保安全提取。右锁骨下动脉拔除1个月后未见假性动脉瘤或夹层等血管并发症。该病例强调了一种潜在的方法来管理IMPELLA插入的类似并发症和血管通路。
    The IMPELLA 5.5 (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts, United States) is a catheter-based, micro-axial blood pump designed to enhance organ perfusion in patients with cardiogenic shock. Despite its superior hemodynamic support, vascular complications are a significant concern, with many patients needing to discontinue IMPELLA therapy due to these issues. Patients may even require surgical intervention to address device-related vascular injuries. The IMPELLA 5.5 implantation in vessels with severe calcification is particularly associated with complications such as vascular calcification, stenosis, vascular tortuosity, and the use of larger sheaths are risk factors following endovascular therapy and IMPELLA implantation. In this report, we present a case of severe calcification in the right subclavian artery, in which the IMPELLA 5.5 was lodged. The calcifications protruded into the vascular lumen, becoming lodged between the IMPELLA motor and the cannula, complicating extraction despite the vessel having sufficient diameter. We successfully removed the device using a balloon dilation technique, ensuring safe extraction. No vascular complications such as pseudoaneurysm or dissection were observed in the right subclavian artery one month after extraction. This case highlights a potential approach for managing similar complications and vascular access for IMPELLA insertion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的本研究报道了一项单中心临床试验,用于血管内治疗有症状的非急性颅内大动脉闭塞(NA-ILAO)。这项研究的目的是评估安全性,可行性,以及单纯球囊扩张和支架植入术的临床效果。方法纳入有症状的NA-ILAO患者。本研究共纳入40例病例。虽然4例患者再通失败,36名患者成功,然后将其分为两组进行进一步分析:球囊扩张组(n=24)和支架植入组(n=12)。围手术期并发症,临床结果,并对随访结果进行分析。结果支架置入组围手术期并发症明显高于单纯球囊扩张组(p<0.05)。球囊和支架组分别有21例和10例90天临床预后良好(改良Rankin量表[mRS]≤2)。分别(p=0.518)。所有成功再通的患者均行数字减影血管造影(DSA)或CT血管造影(CTA),平均随访14个月。球囊扩张组2例,支架植入组1例(p=1.000)。支架组有2例再次闭塞,球囊扩张组无一例(p<0.001)。支架组有2例中风复发,单纯球囊扩张组有1例中风复发(p=0.013)。结论有症状的NA-ILAO患者血管内再通是安全可行的。与支架植入术相比,简单的球囊扩张可能是一种更好的再通方法,但需要更大的随机对照试验来证实这一点。
    Objectives  This study reported a single-center clinical trial of endovascular treatment for symptomatic nonacute occlusion of the intracranial large artery (NA-ILAO). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and clinical effect of simple balloon dilatation and stent implantation. Methods  The patients diagnosed with symptomatic NA-ILAO were enrolled. A total of 40 cases were included in this study. While recanalization failed in 4 patients, it was successful in 36 patients, who were then divided into two groups for further analysis: balloon dilatation group ( n  = 24) and stent implantation group ( n  = 12). The perioperative complications, clinical outcome, and follow-up results were analyzed. Results  Perioperative complications in the stent implantation group were significantly higher than those in the simple balloon dilatation group ( p  < 0.05). There were 21 and 10 cases of 90-day good clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS] ≤ 2) in the balloon and stent groups, respectively ( p  = 0.518). All patients with successful recanalization underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or CT angiography (CTA) during an average follow-up of 14 months. There were two cases of restenosis in the balloon dilatation group and one in the stent implantation group ( p  = 1.000). There were two cases of re-occlusion in the stent group and none in the balloon dilatation group ( p  < 0.001). Stroke recurred in two cases in the stent group and in one case in the simple balloon dilatation group ( p  = 0.013). Conclusion  Endovascular recanalization is safe and feasible for patients with symptomatic NA-ILAO. Compared with stent implantation, simple balloon dilation may be a better recanalization method, but larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm it.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    介绍了一例84岁的男子,该男子使用肌肉减少性吞咽困难诊断算法被诊断为“可能的肌肉减少性吞咽困难”。通过球囊扩张的直接作用,患者表现出改善的食管上括约肌(UES)通道。他患有心肌梗塞,大约一个月不能口服进食,表现为肌肉减少症和严重吞咽困难,如食物摄入水平量表(FILS)得分为1。67天住院时吞咽研究的视频透视检查显示UES开口受损,食物丸无法通过UES。在确认呕吐反射消失后,我们进行了气球扩张,导致改进的UES通过。使用球囊扩张和适当的营养疗法进行吞咽康复,患者进展至完全口服,FILS评分为8分.此病例表明营养疗法和吞咽康复联合球囊扩张术在治疗减少性吞咽困难方面的有效性。此外,球囊扩张术可应用于呈现UES开放受损的肌肉减少性吞咽困难的患者。
    A case of an 84-year-old man diagnosed with \"probable sarcopenic dysphagia\" using the sarcopenic dysphagia diagnostic algorithm is presented. The patient demonstrated improved upper esophageal sphincter (UES) passage by the immediate effect of balloon dilatation. He had suffered a myocardial infarction and was unable to eat orally for approximately a month, presenting with sarcopenia and severe dysphagia, as indicated by the Food Intake LEVEL Scale (FILS) score of 1. Videofluoroscopic examination of swallowing study at 67 hospital days revealed impaired UES opening, with food bolus unable to pass through the UES. After confirming the loss of the gag reflex, we performed balloon dilatation, resulting in improved UES passage. With swallowing rehabilitation using balloon dilatation and appropriate nutritional therapy, the patient progressed to full oral intake and achieved FILS score of 8. This case suggests the effectiveness of combined nutritional therapy and swallowing rehabilitation with balloon dilatation in managing sarcopenic dysphagia. In addition, balloon dilatation could be applied for patients with sarcopenic dysphagia presenting impaired UES opening.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    贲门失弛缓症是一种慢性和罕见的食管运动性疾病。它的特征是痉挛或不存在食管收缩和食管下括约肌松弛的损害。治疗方式包括平滑肌松弛药物,注射肉毒杆菌毒素降低食管括约肌,气动膨胀,和手术干预。气动扩张被认为是一种有效的治疗选择,并且是最广泛使用的非手术干预措施。我们设计了这项前瞻性研究,以寻找气动扩张中使用的球囊压力之间的任何可能的相关性,测压结果,和患者特征。为了找到重复气动扩张的需要和性别等因素之间的任何可能的联系,年龄,症状持续时间,Eckardt得分,每日胸骨后疼痛,测压结果,和气球压力。该研究纳入了31例确诊的贲门失弛缓症患者。所有这些患者都进行了气动扩张。皮尔逊的相关系数为0.234(p值0.23)之间所需的球囊压力和综合松弛压力(IRP)。这些患者中有六名需要重复气动扩张。在重复干预的需要和性别之间没有统计学上的显著关联。40岁以上,20岁以下,Eckardt评分超过10,每日胸痛,症状持续时间超过两年,和IRP超过30mmHg。总之,可以说气动扩张没有100%的成功率,许多贲门失弛缓症患者需要重复治疗。所以,长期随访至关重要。在治疗开始时,管理期望并制定具有适当信息护理的现实计划很重要。
    Achalasia is a chronic and rare disorder of esophageal motility. It is characterized by spastic or absent esophageal contractions and impairment of relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Treatment modalities include smooth muscle-relaxing medications, botulinum toxin injections to lower the esophageal sphincter, pneumatic dilatation, and surgical interventions. Pneumatic dilatation is deemed to be an effective treatment option and is the most widely used non-surgical intervention. We designed this prospective study to look for any possible correlation between balloon pressure used in pneumatic dilatation, manometric findings, and patient characteristics. And to find any possible association between the need for repeat pneumatic dilatations and factors like gender, age, duration of symptoms, Eckardt score, daily retrosternal pain, manometric findings, and balloon pressures. Thirty-one patients with confirmed achalasia were enrolled in the study. All of these patients underwent pneumatic dilatation. Pearson\'s correlation coefficient was found to be 0.234 (p-value 0.23) between the required balloon pressure and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). Six of these patients required repeat pneumatic dilatations. No statistically significant association was noted between the need for repeat intervention and gender, age over 40, age under 20, Eckardt score over 10, daily chest pain, duration of symptoms over two years, and IRP over 30 mmHg. In conclusion, it could be said that pneumatic dilatation does not carry a 100% success rate, and repeat sessions are needed in many of the patients with achalasia. So, long-term follow-up is crucial. Managing expectations and making a realistic plan with proper informational care is important at the beginning of treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    获得性声门下狭窄是婴儿气管插管的常见并发症。21三体,接受搭桥手术的患者的风险增加,患有胃食管反流病.与开放手术技术相比,声门下狭窄的微创内镜球囊扩张术已成为一种更常见的治疗方式。与气道相关的手术需要麻醉师之间的精心准备和良好的沟通,外科医生,和工作人员。在新生儿气道手术中需要更多的预防措施和更有效的准备和沟通,因为与成年人相比,在生理上更容易去饱和和发展低氧血症。我们报告了21三体婴儿经间歇性声门上喷射通气和袋罩通气成功的Myer-CottonIII类声门下狭窄球囊扩张的病例。
    Acquired subglottic stenosis is a common complication of endotracheal intubation in infants. The risk increases in trisomy 21, patients undergoing bypass surgery, and having gastroesophageal reflux disease. Less invasive endoscopic balloon dilatation of subglottic stenosis has become a more common treatment modality compared to open surgical technique. Airway-related surgery needs meticulous preparation and good communication between the anesthetist, surgeon, and staff. More precaution and more effective preparation and communication are needed in neonatal airway surgery as it is physiologically easier to desaturate and develop hypoxemia compared to adults. We report a case of successful balloon dilation of Myer-Cotton class III subglottic stenosis with intermittent supraglottic jet ventilation and bag-mask ventilation in infants with trisomy 21.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:狭窄是与造口相关的严重并发症。造口狭窄的初始治疗主要是手指探条技术或球囊扩张术,复发需要造口重建。然而,使用曲安奈德局部注射治疗造口狭窄尚未见报道.在这里,我们报道了一例高危患者反复发生造口狭窄的病例,其中球囊扩张联合局部注射曲安奈德可有效避免造口重建.
    方法:一名70多岁的妇女因粪便隐血试验阳性而入院,并被诊断为Ra晚期直肠癌。由于存在多种合并症,进行了D3解剖的腹腔镜Hartmann手术。手术时间165min,术中出血量5mL。术后第2天,结肠造口残端变色,并诊断出气孔坏死,成功保守治疗,没有发现气孔脱落或腹膜炎。手术后六个月,诊断为晚期造口狭窄导致结肠梗阻,手指探条技术和球囊扩张无效。为避免在全身麻醉下再次手术,使用CRE™PROGIWireguided(BostonScientific)在19mm处进行3min的球囊扩张,并在造口瘢痕处注射40mg局部曲安奈德。
    结论:治疗后无再狭窄。
    结论:球囊扩张术联合曲安奈德局部注射治疗直肠癌术后高危并发症患者复发性狭窄可能有效。
    BACKGROUND: Stenosis is a serious complication associated with stomas. The initial treatment for stoma stenosis is mainly the finger-bougie technique or balloon dilatation, and recurrence requires stomal reconstruction. However, the use of local triamcinolone injections for treating stoma stenosis has not been reported. Herein, we reported a case of repeated stoma stenosis in a high-risk patient in whom balloon dilatation combined with local triamcinolone injection effectively avoided stomal reconstruction.
    METHODS: A woman in her 70s was admitted to our hospital with the chief complaint of a positive fecal occult blood test and was diagnosed with Ra advanced rectal cancer. Owing to the presence of multiple comorbidities, a laparoscopic Hartmann procedure with D3 dissection was performed. The operative time was 165 min and the intraoperative blood loss was 5 mL. On postoperative day 2, the colostomy stump became discolored, and stoma necrosis was diagnosed, which was successfully treated conservatively, with no findings of stoma falling or peritonitis. Six months after surgery, late stoma stenosis causing colonic obstruction was diagnosed, and the finger-bougie technique and balloon dilatation were ineffective. To avoid reoperation under general anesthesia, balloon dilatation using a CRE™ PRO GI Wireguided (Boston Scientific) at 19 mm for 3 min combined with a 40 mg injection of local triamcinolone into the stoma orifice scar was successfully performed.
    CONCLUSIONS: No restenosis was observed after treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: Balloon dilatation combined with local triamcinolone injections may be effective for recurrent stoma stenosis in patients with high-risk comorbidities after rectal cancer surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估咽鼓管球囊扩张(BDET)在患有咽鼓管功能障碍(ETD)的成年人群中的有效性和安全性。
    方法:遵循PRISMA标准,通过搜索PubMed进行了系统的审查,科克伦,和Embase数据库从2015年1月到2024年3月。主要结果包括咽鼓管评分(ETS),鼓室测压,和瓦尔萨尔瓦演习。使用预后研究质量(QUIPS)仪器评估研究质量。
    结果:总体而言,11项研究纳入系统评价:两项随机对照试验,三项前瞻性调查,和六项回顾性研究。所有研究中的球囊扩张均使用Spiggle&Theis或Acclarent导管进行球囊扩张。在患者选择方面,研究BDET对持续性ETD的影响存在异质性。随访期,给予保守或手术治疗,以及评估方法的使用。总的来说,治疗缓解了症状,在平均随访时间后表现出稳定性或进一步改善。此外,并发症的发生率被归类为低和自发解决.大多数研究表现出与混杂变量相关的高风险偏倚,因此,大多数研究的总体偏倚风险被认为较高.
    结论:研究结果表明,BDET有望治疗ETD,减少症状严重程度,并发症最少。尽管如此,有必要改进坚持既定适应症的研究,方法论,和结果来建立更有力的证据。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ballon dilation of the eustachian tube (BDET) in adult population suffering from Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD).
    METHODS: Following PRISMA criteria, a systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases from January 2015 to March 2024. The primary outcomes included Eustachian Tube Score (ETS), tympanometry, and Valsalva maneuver. The quality of studies was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) instrument.
    RESULTS: Overall, 11 studies were incorporated into the systematic review: two RCTs, three prospective investigations, and six retrospective studies. The balloon dilation in all investigations was performed using either Spiggle & Theis or Acclarent catheters for balloon dilation. There was heterogeneity across studies examining the effect of BDET on persistent ETD in terms of patient selection, period of follow-up, administration of conservative or surgical therapies, and use of assessment methods. Overall, the treatment yielded alleviation of symptoms, which either exhibited stability over time or demonstrated further improvement after an average duration of follow-up. Moreover, the incidence of complications was categorized as low and resolving spontaneously. The majority of the studies exhibited a high risk of bias related to confounding variables, and consequently, the overall risk of bias across most studies was considered high.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest BDET holds promise for ETD treatment, reducing symptom severity with minimal complications. Nonetheless, there is a need for improved studies that adhere to established indications, methodologies, and outcomes to establish a more robust body of evidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:功能性胃狭窄,袖状胃切除术的结果,被定义为胃管沿其纵向轴线的旋转。它是由胃扭曲引起的,而没有胃腔的解剖收缩。在内窥镜检查期间,钉书线顺时针旋转偏离,狭窄需要额外的内窥镜操作来进行转位。上消化道系列显示某些患者的胃扭曲,胃管上游扩张。关于其管理的数据仍然很少。目的是评估内镜下球囊扩张术治疗功能性袖状胃切除术后狭窄的有效性和安全性。患者和方法:本回顾性研究包括在2017年至2023年之间进行内镜球囊扩张的22例原发性袖状胃切除术后功能性狭窄患者。接受替代治疗计划的患者和接受内镜扩张治疗其他形式胃狭窄的患者被排除在外。临床结果用于评估球囊扩张术在功能性胃狭窄治疗中的有效性和安全性。结果:22例患者(100%)使用30mm球囊进行了45次扩张,18例患者(81.82%)的35毫米球囊,5例患者(22.73%),40毫米球囊。第一次球囊扩张后患者的临床反应是完全临床反应(4例患者,18.18%),部分临床反应(12名患者,54.55%),和无反应(6名患者,27.27%)。19例患者(86.36%)在6个月时取得了临床成功。3例(13.64%)在达到最大球囊扩张40mm后仍有症状的患者被认为是内窥镜扩张失败。他们被转诊接受手术治疗。在球囊扩张期间或之后没有发现明显的不良事件。结论:内镜下球囊扩张术是治疗功能性袖状胃切除术后狭窄的一种有效且安全的微创手术。
    Background and Objectives: Functional gastric stenosis, a consequence of sleeve gastrectomy, is defined as a rotation of the gastric tube along its longitudinal axis. It is brought on by gastric twisting without the anatomical constriction of the gastric lumen. During endoscopic examination, the staple line is deviated with a clockwise rotation, and the stenosis requires additional endoscopic manipulations for its transposition. Upper gastrointestinal series show the gastric twist with an upstream dilatation of the gastric tube in some patients. Data on its management have remained scarce. The objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilatation in the management of functional post-sleeve gastrectomy stenosis. Patients and Methods: Twenty-two patients with functional post-primary-sleeve-gastrectomy stenosis who had an endoscopic balloon dilatation between 2017 and 2023 were included in this retrospective study. Patients with alternative treatment plans and those undergoing endoscopic dilatation for other forms of gastric stenosis were excluded. The clinical outcomes were used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of balloon dilatation in the management of functional gastric stenosis. Results: A total of 45 dilatations were performed with a 30 mm balloon in 22 patients (100%), a 35 mm balloon in 18 patients (81.82%), and a 40 mm balloon in 5 patients (22.73%). The patients\' clinical responses after the first balloon dilatation were a complete clinical response (4 patients, 18.18%), a partial clinical response (12 patients, 54.55%), and a non-response (6 patients, 27.27%). Nineteen patients (86.36%) had achieved clinical success at six months. Three patients (13.64%) who remained symptomatic even after achieving the maximal balloon dilation of 40 mm were considered failure of endoscopic dilatation, and they were referred for surgical intervention. No significant adverse events were found during or following the balloon dilatation. Conclusions: Endoscopic balloon dilatation is an effective and safe minimally invasive procedure in the management of functional post-sleeve-gastrectomy stenosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号