BPSD

BPSD
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:痴呆的行为和心理症状(BPSD)在痴呆患者中很常见。芳香疗法可以降低BPSD的频率和严重程度。我们对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估芳香疗法在缓解痴呆患者BPSD和改善功能能力方面的疗效。
    方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
    方法:接受芳香疗法的痴呆患者。
    方法:使用PubMed进行了文献检索,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆在2024年3月之前发表的RCT比较了痴呆患者的芳香疗法和对照治疗。
    结果:共有15项试验涉及821例患者。总的来说,芳香疗法治疗1个月后观察到BPSD显著降低.在15项试验中,9报告了科恩-曼斯菲尔德躁动清单(CMAI)得分,7评估了神经精神量表(NPI)评分。荟萃分析显示,与对照组相比,接受3至4周芳香疗法的患者的CMAI评分(加权平均差异[WMD]-6.31,95%CI-9.52至-3.11)和NPI评分(WMD-8.07,95%CI-13.53至-2.61)显着改善。15项试验中有4项报告了抑郁情绪的改善,3项试验报告了功能能力的改善。
    结论:结论:芳香疗法是一种安全可行的非药物治疗方法,可改善痴呆症患者的BPSD,并与按摩联合使用具有更高的疗效。
    OBJECTIVE: Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are common in people with dementia. Aromatherapy may reduce the frequency and severity of BPSD. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of aromatherapy in relieving BPSD and improving functional ability in people with dementia.
    METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    METHODS: Patients with dementia receiving aromatherapy.
    METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for RCTs published before March 2024 comparing aromatherapy with control treatments in patients with dementia.
    RESULTS: There were 15 trials involving 821 patients. Overall, significant reduction in BPSD was observed after 1 month of aromatherapy treatment. Among 15 trials, 9 reported the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) score, and 7 evaluated the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) score. The meta-analysis showed significant improvement in CMAI score (weighted mean difference [WMD] -6.31, 95% CI -9.52 to -3.11) and NPI score (WMD -8.07, 95% CI -13.53 to -2.61) in patients receiving 3 to 4 weeks of aromatherapy compared with the control group. Four of the 15 trials reported improvement in depressive mood and 3 trials reported no significant improvement in functional ability.
    CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, aromatherapy is a safe and viable nonpharmacologic treatment to improve BPSD in people with dementia and its combination with massage showed higher efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    痴呆的行为和心理症状(BPSD)是一组异质性的具有挑战性的行为障碍,心情,感知,并认为几乎所有痴呆症患者都会发生这种情况。已经开发了大量的工具来评估不同人群和环境中的BPSD。尽管其中一些工具比其他工具使用更广泛,没有一个单一的仪器可以被认为是完全令人满意的,这些工具都有其优点和缺点。在这篇叙述性评论中,我们全面概述了大量此类工具的特点,解决它们的适用性,优势,和限制。这些取决于设置,所需的专业知识,和参与的人,在选择最合适的秤或工具时,需要考虑所有这些因素。我们还简要讨论了BPSD的客观生物标志物的使用。最后,我们试图为该领域的未来研究提供指示,并提出可能的新工具的理想特征,应该很短,易于理解和使用,以治疗为导向,为临床医生提供频率等数据,严重程度,和行为的触发因素,使他们能够找到适当的策略来有效地解决BPSD。
    The behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are a heterogeneous set of challenging disturbances of behavior, mood, perception, and thought that occur in almost all patients with dementia. A huge number of instruments have been developed to assess BPSD in different populations and settings. Although some of these tools are more widely used than others, no single instrument can be considered completely satisfactory, and each of these tools has its advantages and disadvantages. In this narrative review, we have provided a comprehensive overview of the characteristics of a large number of such instruments, addressing their applicability, strengths, and limitations. These depend on the setting, the expertise required, and the people involved, and all these factors need to be taken into account when choosing the most suitable scale or tool. We have also briefly discussed the use of objective biomarkers of BPSD. Finally, we have attempted to provide indications for future research in the field and suggest the ideal characteristics of a possible new tool, which should be short, easy to understand and use, and treatment oriented, providing clinicians with data such as frequency, severity, and triggers of behaviors and enabling them to find appropriate strategies to effectively tackle BPSD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BPSD相对常见,但对痴呆症患者来说却深感不安,他们的家庭,和照顾者。最近,人们越来越认识到BPSD对生活质量的影响,但是评估和管理方法仍然缺乏。围绕BPSD标签的相当大的争议引起了极大的关注,这意味着它对痴呆症患者及其护理人员所经历的已经普遍存在的痴呆症相关污名的贡献。这篇简短的评论旨在总结突出的观点,争议,以及评估的考虑,管理,和BPSD的感知,努力提供BPSD的潜在重新表征,以促进和优先考虑痴呆症患者的人格。
    BPSD is relatively common but profoundly disturbing to persons with dementia, their family, and caregivers. Growing recognition of the impact of BPSD on quality of life has improved recently, but assessment and management approaches are still lacking. Considerable controversy surrounding the label of BPSD has garnered a great deal of attention, with implications of its contribution to the already pervasive dementia-related stigma experienced by persons with dementia and their caregivers. This brief review aims to summarize salient viewpoints, controversies, and considerations of the assessment, management, and perception of BPSD, in an effort to offer potential recharacterizations of BPSD to promote and prioritize personhood in persons with dementia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    痴呆症的行为和心理症状(BPSD)是在痴呆症(PwD)患者中发现的一组异质性的心理和行为异常,显著影响他们和照顾者的生活质量。当前的评估工具,如神经精神量表(NPI),受到召回偏见和缺乏直接观察的限制。这项研究旨在克服这一限制,通过使用一种新型仪器,使护理人员的报告更加客观,被称为BPSDiary。这项随机对照试验将涉及300名护理人员-PwDdyads。目的是评估BPSDiary的使用是否可以显着减轻护理人员的负担,使用Zarit负担访谈(ZBI)进行评估,与通常的护理相比。这项研究将包括成人PwD,与患者生活在一起或在患者附近的护理人员,和BPSD与HIDA(多动症,冲动,烦躁,去抑制,侵略,搅动)领域。随机分配到干预组的护理人员将使用BPSDiary记录特定的BPSD,包括失眠,激动/焦虑,侵略,无目的的运动行为,和妄想/幻觉,登记发病时间,严重程度,和潜在的触发因素。主要结果将是3个月时ZBI评分的变化,次要结果包括NPI评分的变化,奥氮平等效物,与特定BPSD域相关的NPI-遇险分数,以及护理人员和医生的满意度。这项研究将在9个意大利中心进行,代表不同的地理和社会文化背景。虽然潜在的局限性包括相对较短的观察期和对特定BPSD干扰的关注,BPSDiary可以为医生提供客观数据,以定制适当的非药物和药物干预措施.此外,它可以通过鼓励对BPSD触发因素的反思来赋予护理人员权力,有可能改善PwD及其护理人员的生活质量。
    NCT05977855。
    Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) are a heterogeneous set of psychological and behavioral abnormalities seen in persons with dementia (PwD), significantly impacting their quality of life and that of their caregivers. Current assessment tools, such as the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), are limited by recall bias and lack of direct observation. This study aims to overcome this limitation by making caregiver reports more objective through the use of a novel instrument, referred to as the BPSDiary. This randomized controlled trial will involve 300 caregiver-PwD dyads. The objective is to evaluate whether the use of the BPSDiary could significantly reduce caregiver burden, assessed using the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), compared to usual care. The study will include adult PwD, caregivers living with or close to the patient, and BPSD related to the HIDA (hyperactivity, impulsivity, irritability, disinhibition, aggression, agitation) domain. Caregivers randomized to the intervention arm will use the BPSDiary to record specific BPSD, including insomnia, agitation/anxiety, aggression, purposeless motor behavior, and delusions/hallucinations, registering time of onset, severity, and potential triggers. The primary outcome will be the change in ZBI scores at 3 months, with secondary outcomes including changes in NPI scores, olanzapine equivalents, NPI-distress scores related to specific BPSD domains, and caregiver and physician satisfaction. The study will be conducted in 9 Italian centers, representing diverse geographic and sociocultural contexts. While potential limitations include the relatively short observation period and the focus on specific BPSD disturbances, the BPSDiary could provide physicians with objective data to tailor appropriate non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions. Additionally, it may empower caregivers by encouraging reflection on BPSD triggers, with the potential to improve the quality of life for both PwD and their caregivers.
    UNASSIGNED: NCT05977855.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    花园和室外空间是痴呆症患者机构环境的重要组成部分。然而,关于这些空间对痴呆症患者的益处的证据仍然有限。本文介绍了在急性医院的高度依赖的精神病院中将难以接近的室外空间重新开发为治疗花园的评估。
    进行混合方法评价。中断的时间序列分析使用常规收集的数据调查了花园对跌倒和挑战患者行为的影响。通过(a)员工调查和(b)对患者家属的半结构化访谈来捕获重新开发的花园的观点。
    在花园开放时,跌倒率和挑战性行为有所下降,但在花园开放前后,每个月的跌倒率都在上升。大多数工作人员认为花园为患者提供了好处,但是有限的工作人员时间和对患者安全的担忧是使用的障碍。家庭确定了与花园使用相关的四个主要主题,包括:(1)外部(2)职业和身份,(3)刺激,(4)障碍和促进者。
    花园受到家庭和工作人员的积极评价,有一些障碍阻止了它被更好地利用。员工对风险的担忧并未反映在跌倒和具有挑战性的行为结果中。进一步研究如何克服花园使用障碍是合理的。
    UNASSIGNED: Gardens and outdoor spaces are an important part of institutional environments for people with dementia. However, evidence regarding the benefits these spaces have for people with dementia is still limited. This paper presents the evaluation of the redevelopment of an inaccessible outdoor space into a therapeutic garden on a high dependency psychogeriatric unit in an acute hospital.
    UNASSIGNED: A Mixed methods evaluation was undertaken. An interrupted time series analysis investigated the impact of the garden on falls and challenging behaviours of patients using routinely collected data. Perspectives of the redeveloped garden were captured through (a) a staff survey and (b) semi-structured interviews with families of patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Rates of falls and challenging behaviours dropped at the time of the garden opening but showed increasing rates each month both before and after the garden opened. Most staff believed that the garden provided benefits for patients however limited staff time and concerns over patient safety were barriers to use. Families identified four main themes related to garden use including: (1) being outside (2) occupation and identity, (3) being stimulating, and (4) barriers and facilitators.
    UNASSIGNED: The garden was regarded positively by families and staff however, there were barriers that prevented it from being better utilised. Staff concerns over risk were not reflected in falls and challenging behaviour outcomes. Further research into how barriers to garden use may be overcome is justified.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为了评估知识,护士对痴呆行为和心理症状(BPSD)的非药物治疗的态度和实践。
    方法:这个横截面,以问卷调查为基础的研究招募北京协和医院护士(北京,中国)2022年9月至2022年10月。知识之间的相关性,态度和实践评分采用Pearson相关分析。与知识相关的因素,态度和实践得分通过多元线性回归确定。根据横断面问卷调查,本研究根据《中国痴呆诊疗指南》设计问卷,并于2022年9月至2022年10月通过文娟星在线平台随机抽取北京协和医院护士填写问题。
    结果:分析包括210名护士(202名女性)。平均知识,态度和实践得分为11.06±2.61(总分:18),53.51±5.81(总分:60)和64.66±10.35(总分:80)分,分别。知识得分与态度得分(r=0.416,P<0.001)、实践得分(r=0.389,P<0.001)呈正相关,态度得分与实践得分(r=0.627,P<0.001)。多变量分析表明,年龄≥40岁(与≤30岁)与较高的知识得分相关(β=1.48,95%置信区间[95CI]=0.42-2.54,P=0.006)。年龄≥40岁(β=1.43,95CI=0.35-2.51,P=0.010vs.≤30岁)和学士学位或更高(β=1.11,95CI=0.12-2.10,P=0.028vs.大学学历或更低)与较高的实践分数相关。
    结论:年龄大、文化程度高与知识水平高相关。态度和/或练习分数。这项研究的结果可能有助于指导教育和培训计划的制定和实施,以改善中国护士对BPSD的管理。
    BACKGROUND: To evaluate the knowledge, attitude and practice of nurses regarding non-pharmacologic therapies for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD).
    METHODS: This cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study enrolled nurses at Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Beijing, China) between September 2022 and October 2022. Correlations between knowledge, attitude and practice scores were evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis. Factors associated with knowledge, attitude and practice scores were identified by multivariable linear regression. Based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey, this study designed a questionnaire according to the Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia in China, and randomly selected nurses from Peking Union Medical College Hospital to fill in the questions through the Wen-Juan-Xing online platform from September 2022 to October 2022.
    RESULTS: The analysis included 210 nurses (202 females). The average knowledge, attitude and practice scores were 11.06±2.61 (total score: 18), 53.51±5.81 (total score: 60) and 64.66 ± 10.35 (total score: 80) points, respectively. Knowledge score was positively correlated with attitude score (r = 0.416, P < 0.001) and practice score (r = 0.389, P < 0.001); attitude and practice scores were also positively correlated (r = 0.627, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that age ≥ 40 years-old (vs. ≤30 years-old) was associated with higher knowledge score (β = 1.48, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 0.42-2.54, P = 0.006). Age ≥ 40 years-old (β = 1.43, 95%CI = 0.35-2.51, P = 0.010 vs. ≤30 years-old) and bachelor\'s degree or higher (β = 1.11, 95%CI = 0.12-2.10, P = 0.028 vs. college degree or lower) were associated with higher practice score.
    CONCLUSIONS: Older age and higher education level were associated with higher knowledge, attitude and/or practice scores. The findings of this study may help guide the development and implementation of education and training programs to improve the management of BPSD by nurses in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:案例会议被描述为面向目标,团队成员可以使用的系统方法来交流专业意见并制定针对特定护理问题的治疗措施。然而,并非所有的案例会议都被证明是有效的。挪威针对神经精神症状的评估和治疗的目标跨学科模型(TIME)是基于案例会议的有效多成分模型,该模型为养老院中痴呆症居民的行为和心理症状提供了方法。我们的目的是探索基于认知行为疗法(CBT)的TIME案例会议如何促进以人为本的行动,以及TIME的特定归纳结构如何对模型的有效性做出贡献。
    方法:我们使用了六个案例会议的视频观察,并通过对视频中的成绩单进行主题跨案例分析并通过迭代观看视频来分析这些视频。根据哈贝马斯的交际行为理论,我们强调了案例会议的内容,即,在案例会议上讨论了什么,以及案例会议参与者之间的交流显示。
    结果:我们的研究结果表明,时间背后的理论原理,包括以人为本的护理和CBT的诱导结构,反映了哈贝马斯交往行为理论的许多方面。特别是,TIME案例会议强调了居民和员工的生活世界观点,并为哈贝马斯所说的交流理性做出了贡献,该理性是在员工之间发展共同理解并创造以人为本的行动的一种手段。
    结论:关于TIME案例会议如何以及为什么有助于TIME降低疗养院BPSD的有效性的一个因果假设是,案例会议的特定归纳结构基于ABC方法和PCC,强调生活世界对居民和工作人员的重要性。尽管案例会议被强调是有用的,这些案例会议的结构和进行方式并不无关紧要。
    背景:试验时间于2016年1月6日在clinicaltrials.gov(NCT02655003)注册。
    BACKGROUND: Case conferences are described as a goal-oriented, systematic method that team members can use to exchange professional opinions and develop treatment actions for a particular care problem. However, not all case conferences have proven to be effective. The Norwegian Targeted Interdisciplinary Model for the Evaluation and Treatment of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms (TIME) is an effective multicomponent model based on case conferences that informs approaches to behavioural and psychological symptoms in residents with dementia in nursing homes. Our aim was to explore how TIME case conferences structured based on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) contributed to person-centred actions and how the specific inductive structure of the TIME may have contributed to the effectiveness of the model.
    METHODS: We used video observation of six case conferences and analysed these videos by performing a thematic cross-case analysis of the transcripts from the videos and by iteratively watching the videos. According to Habermas\'s theory of communicative action, we emphasized the case conference content, i.e., what was talked about in the case conferences, and the display of communication between the participants in the case conferences.
    RESULTS: Our findings showed that the theoretical principles behind the TIME, including both person-centred care and the inductive structure of CBT, reflected many aspects of Habermas\'s theory of communicative actions. In particular, the TIME case conferences emphasized the lifeworld perspective for both residents and staff and contributed to what Habermas labelled communicative rationality as a means to develop shared understanding among staff and create person-centred action.
    CONCLUSIONS: One causal assumption of how and why the TIME case conferences contributed to the effectiveness of the TIME in reducing BPSD in nursing homes is that the specific inductive structure of the case conferences with the column technique based on the ABC method together with PCC, emphasized the importance of the lifeworld for both the resident and the staff. Even though case conferences have been highlighted as useful, it is not indifferent how these case conferences are structured and conducted.
    BACKGROUND: The trial TIME was registered January 6, 2016, with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02655003).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:痴呆的行为和心理症状(BPSD)很常见,给患者带来了巨大的负担,看护者,和卫生系统。然而,治疗BPSD的药物选择很少。我们对抗惊厥药对BPSD疗效的临床试验进行了系统评价。
    方法:我们搜索了5个电子数据库,直到2023年1月,用于评估非苯二氮卓抗惊厥药治疗BPSD的疗效的随机对照试验和系统评价。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具来确定纳入试验的偏倚风险。因为使用荟萃分析对结果进行统计汇集是不可行的,我们使用Cochrane合成无荟萃分析报告指南综合了研究结果。
    结果:我们确定了12项研究,包括随机对照试验(RCTs)和1个系统评价。最近的Cochrane评论合成了五个评估丙戊酸的RCT,得出的结论是该药物可能对BPSD无效。我们从6项试验中提取了数据,涉及248人,比较了非苯二氮卓抗惊厥药与安慰剂或利培酮。四项试验(n=97名参与者)评估了卡马西平,其中只有一个在简短的精神病学评定量表测量躁动方面有所改善,敌意,精神病,和戒断/抑郁(效应大小:1.13;95%置信区间[CI]:0.54-1.73)相对于安慰剂。相对于安慰剂(5/24;21%),接受卡马西平的患者(20/27;74%)的不良反应更为常见。有低质量的证据表明奥卡西平可能无效,托吡酯可能与利培酮相当。
    结论:抗惊厥药不太可能对BPSD有效,尽管现有证据的质量很低。
    OBJECTIVE: Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are common and impart a significant burden to patients, caregivers, and the health system. However, there are few pharmacological options for treating BPSD. We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials examining the efficacy of anticonvulsants in BPSD.
    METHODS: We searched five electronic databases through January 2023, for randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy of non-benzodiazepine anticonvulsants for the treatment of BPSD. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to ascertain the risk of bias in included trials. Because statistical pooling of results using meta-analysis was not feasible, we synthesized findings using the Cochrane Synthesis Without Meta-analysis reporting guidelines.
    RESULTS: We identified 12 studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 systematic review. Five RCTs evaluating valproic acid were synthesized by a recent Cochrane review which concluded that this drug is likely ineffective for BPSD. We extracted data from 6 trials involving 248 individuals comparing non-benzodiazepine anticonvulsants to either placebo or risperidone. Four trials (n = 97 participants) evaluated carbamazepine, only one of which demonstrated an improvement in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale measuring agitation, hostility, psychosis, and withdrawal/depression (effect size: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-1.73) relative to placebo. Adverse effects were more common in patients receiving carbamazepine (20/27; 74%) relative to placebo (5/24; 21%). There is low quality evidence that oxcarbazepine is likely ineffective and that topiramate may be comparable to risperidone.
    CONCLUSIONS: Anticonvulsants are unlikely to be effective in BPSD, although the quality of existing evidence is low.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    痴呆的行为和心理症状(BPSD)是缺乏合理分类的临床挑战,经常与合并者BPSD进行演示,缺乏具体的药物干预措施,随机临床试验的方法学证据基础差,来自年轻人和成人精神疾病行为障碍治疗的污染,精神药物的小功效窗。我们在这里提出了一个基于概念驱动的文献综述的治疗工作流程,该工作流程基于以下概念:(i)BPSD的病因可以主要是神经生物学(所谓的“原发性”症状)或主要是环境和功能(“继发性”症状),并且这驱动了治疗;(ii)精神药物的临床疗效是由其受体亲和力的特定特征驱动的;(iii)药物治疗应遵循“低启动缓慢”规定和修改\'。本文支持主要和次要BPSD之间的区别,以及它们的特点,到目前为止,这在文献中只是粗略的描述。它还为BPSD的治疗提供了全面而务实的面向临床医生的建议。
    Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are a clinical challenge for the lack of a sound taxonomy, frequent presentation with comorbid BPSD, lack of specific pharmacologic interventions, poor base of methodologically sound evidence with randomized clinical trials, contamination from the treatment of behavioural disturbances of young and adult psychiatric conditions, and small efficacy window of psychotropic drugs. We present here a treatment workflow based on a concept-driven literature review based on the notions that (i) the aetiology of BPSD can be mainly neurobiological (so-called \'primary\' symptoms) or mainly environmental and functional (\'secondary\' symptoms) and that this drives treatment; (ii) the clinical efficacy of psychotropic drugs is driven by their specific profile of receptor affinity; (iii) drug treatment should follow the rules of \'start low-go slow, prescribe and revise\'. This article argues in support of the distinction between primary and secondary BPSD, as well as their characteristics, which until now have been just sketchily described in the literature. It also offers comprehensive and pragmatic clinician-oriented recommendations for the treatment of BPSD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号