BPSD

BPSD
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    痴呆症的行为和心理症状(BPSD)是在痴呆症(PwD)患者中发现的一组异质性的心理和行为异常,显著影响他们和照顾者的生活质量。当前的评估工具,如神经精神量表(NPI),受到召回偏见和缺乏直接观察的限制。这项研究旨在克服这一限制,通过使用一种新型仪器,使护理人员的报告更加客观,被称为BPSDiary。这项随机对照试验将涉及300名护理人员-PwDdyads。目的是评估BPSDiary的使用是否可以显着减轻护理人员的负担,使用Zarit负担访谈(ZBI)进行评估,与通常的护理相比。这项研究将包括成人PwD,与患者生活在一起或在患者附近的护理人员,和BPSD与HIDA(多动症,冲动,烦躁,去抑制,侵略,搅动)领域。随机分配到干预组的护理人员将使用BPSDiary记录特定的BPSD,包括失眠,激动/焦虑,侵略,无目的的运动行为,和妄想/幻觉,登记发病时间,严重程度,和潜在的触发因素。主要结果将是3个月时ZBI评分的变化,次要结果包括NPI评分的变化,奥氮平等效物,与特定BPSD域相关的NPI-遇险分数,以及护理人员和医生的满意度。这项研究将在9个意大利中心进行,代表不同的地理和社会文化背景。虽然潜在的局限性包括相对较短的观察期和对特定BPSD干扰的关注,BPSDiary可以为医生提供客观数据,以定制适当的非药物和药物干预措施.此外,它可以通过鼓励对BPSD触发因素的反思来赋予护理人员权力,有可能改善PwD及其护理人员的生活质量。
    NCT05977855。
    Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) are a heterogeneous set of psychological and behavioral abnormalities seen in persons with dementia (PwD), significantly impacting their quality of life and that of their caregivers. Current assessment tools, such as the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), are limited by recall bias and lack of direct observation. This study aims to overcome this limitation by making caregiver reports more objective through the use of a novel instrument, referred to as the BPSDiary. This randomized controlled trial will involve 300 caregiver-PwD dyads. The objective is to evaluate whether the use of the BPSDiary could significantly reduce caregiver burden, assessed using the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), compared to usual care. The study will include adult PwD, caregivers living with or close to the patient, and BPSD related to the HIDA (hyperactivity, impulsivity, irritability, disinhibition, aggression, agitation) domain. Caregivers randomized to the intervention arm will use the BPSDiary to record specific BPSD, including insomnia, agitation/anxiety, aggression, purposeless motor behavior, and delusions/hallucinations, registering time of onset, severity, and potential triggers. The primary outcome will be the change in ZBI scores at 3 months, with secondary outcomes including changes in NPI scores, olanzapine equivalents, NPI-distress scores related to specific BPSD domains, and caregiver and physician satisfaction. The study will be conducted in 9 Italian centers, representing diverse geographic and sociocultural contexts. While potential limitations include the relatively short observation period and the focus on specific BPSD disturbances, the BPSDiary could provide physicians with objective data to tailor appropriate non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions. Additionally, it may empower caregivers by encouraging reflection on BPSD triggers, with the potential to improve the quality of life for both PwD and their caregivers.
    UNASSIGNED: NCT05977855.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are common among people with dementia from the early stages and can appear even in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, the prognostic impact of BPSD is unclear. This study examined the association between BPSD and mortality among people with cognitive impairment.
    METHODS: This longitudinal study involved 1,065 males and 1,681 females (mean age: males = 77.1 years; females = 78.6 years) with MCI or dementia diagnosis, from the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology-Life Stories of People with Dementia (NCGG-STORIES), a single-center memory clinic-based cohort study in Japan that registered first-time outpatients from 2010-2018. Information about death was collected through a mail survey returned by participants or their close relatives, with an up to 8-year follow-up. BPSD was assessed using the Dementia Behavior Disturbance Scale (DBD) at baseline.
    RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 229 (28.1%) male and 254 (15.1%) female deaths occurred. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that higher DBD scores were significantly associated with increased mortality risk among males, but not females (compared with the lowest quartile score group, hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals] for the highest quartile score group = 1.59 [1.11-2.29] for males and 1.06 [0.66-1.70] for females). Among the DBD items, lack of interest in daily living, excessive daytime sleep, and refusal to receive care had a higher mortality risk.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest a potential association between BPSD and poor prognosis among males with cognitive impairment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腕部肌动描记术可以成为评估痴呆(BPSD)的睡眠和其他行为和心理症状的客观工具。我们调查了在躁动的晚期痴呆患者中使用可穿戴式活动记录仪的可行性。
    方法:激惹,大伦敦地区晚期老年痴呆症护理院居民(n=29;14名女性,平均年龄±SD:80.8±8.2;93.1%的白人)被招募佩戴活动记录表4周。提取佩戴时间来评估依从性,并探讨了影响依从性的因素。
    结果:观察接受度较高(96.6%)和依从率较高(88.0%)。不依从性与年龄或BPSD症状无关。然而,认知功能"较好"(R=0.42,p=0.022)和夜班期间(F1.240,33.475=8.075,p=0.005)的参与者依从性较低.女性参与者的依从性也略低(F1,26=3.790,p=0.062)。
    结论:腕部肌动描记术在晚期躁动性痴呆患者中似乎是可以接受和可行的。满足患者及其护理人员的需求可以进一步提高依从性。
    Wrist-worn actigraphy can be an objective tool to assess sleep and other behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD). We investigated the feasibility of using wearable actigraphy in agitated late-stage dementia patients.
    Agitated, late-stage Alzheimer\'s dementia care home residents in Greater London area (n = 29; 14 females, mean age ± SD: 80.8 ± 8.2; 93.1% White) were recruited to wear an actigraphy watch for 4 weeks. Wearing time was extracted to evaluate compliance, and factors influencing compliance were explored.
    A high watch-acceptance (96.6%) and compliance rate (88.0%) was noted. Non-compliance was not associated with age or BPSD symptomatology. However, participants with \"better\" cognitive function (R = 0.42, p = 0.022) and during nightshift (F1.240, 33.475 = 8.075, p = 0.005) were less compliant. Female participants were also marginally less compliant (F1, 26 = 3.790, p = 0.062).
    Wrist-worn actigraphy appears acceptable and feasible in late-stage agitated dementia patients. Accommodating the needs of both the patients and their carers may further improve compliance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    确定患有痴呆的活动性和挑战性行为和心理症状(BPSD)的人的死亡率预测因子。
    一项回顾性病例对照研究旨在比较在至2016年11月的12个月内死亡的澳大利亚痴呆症支持(DSA)患者与未死亡的同等数量的对照组。在文献回顾和服务专家意见之后,设计了一个审计工具。使用赔率比计算和Mann-WhitneyU检验来评估差异。
    拥有BPSD的澳大利亚老年护理机构的居民参考DSA服务。
    在研究期间转诊DSA的476名患者中,44人死亡从年龄和性别的其余匹配者中随机选择44名对照。
    显著差异包括苯二氮卓类药物的使用率更高,困倦,谵妄,减少口服摄入量,并讨论死者的护理目标。死者的时间较短,DSA与疗养院的护士之间的接触更加频繁。死者中阿片类药物使用的增加和皮肤完整性的丧失具有重要意义。整个生命过程的结束表明了一系列复杂的需求,频繁的谵妄,痛苦和脆弱。
    需要进一步的研究,以确定那些患有BPSD的人在生命结束时的最佳护理。这项研究将表明复杂的生命终止护理需求,并指出姑息治疗支持的作用。
    UNASSIGNED: To identify predictors of mortality in people with active and challenging behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD).
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective case-control study was designed to compare those referred to Dementia Support Australia (DSA) who died in the 12 months to November 2016, with an equal number of controls who did not die. An audit tool was designed after literature review and expert opinion from the service. Odds ratio calculations and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to assess for difference.
    UNASSIGNED: Residents of Australian residential aged care facilities with BPSD referred to the DSA service.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 476 patients referred to DSA during the study period, 44 died. 44 controls were randomly selected from those remaining matched for age and sex.
    UNASSIGNED: Significant differences included higher rates of benzodiazepine use, drowsiness, delirium, reduced oral intake and discussions about goals of care in those who died. Those who died were referred to the service for a shorter period and had more frequent contact between DSA and nurses at the nursing homes. Increase in opioid use and loss of skin integrity in those who died approached significance. The overall end of life course demonstrated a complex set of needs with frequent delirium, pain and frailty.
    UNASSIGNED: Further study is required to determine the optimal care for those with BPSD at the end of their lives. This study would indicate complex end of life care needs and point to a role for palliative care support.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:二甲双胍,2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的一线抗糖尿病药物治疗,建议是抗炎的,抗氧化,改善认知功能,为治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)做出了有希望的贡献。然而,二甲双胍对AD患者的行为和精神症状(BPSD)的影响尚未研究。
    目的:研究二甲双胍与AD和T2DM患者BPSD之间的关系,并探讨与其他降糖药物可能的相互作用。
    方法:本横断面研究基于来自瑞典BPSD注册的数据。共纳入3745例AD和抗糖尿病药物治疗患者。通过二元逻辑回归研究了抗糖尿病药物与BPSD之间的关联和相互作用。
    结果:使用二甲双胍与调整年龄后抑郁症状(OR0.77,CI(95%)0.61-0.96,p=0.022)和焦虑(OR0.74,CI(95%)0.58-0.94,p=0.015)的几率较低,性别,特异性诊断,和毒品。我们无法证明这种关联与另一种抗糖尿病药物。交互作用仅限于使用二甲双胍和其他抗糖尿病药物的饮食和食欲紊乱的相关性增加(即,胰岛素以外的药物,磺酰脲,或二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂)。
    结论:这项研究的结果表明,二甲双胍可能对诊断为AD的患者有益。除了血糖控制。虽然,在指定二甲双胍在治疗BPSD中的作用之前,需要更多的知识。
    Metformin, the first-line anti-diabetic drug treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is suggested to be anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, and improve cognitive function, making it a promising contribution to treating Alzheimer´s disease (AD). However, the effect of metformin on behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in patients with AD has not been explored.
    To investigate the associations between metformin and BPSD in patients with AD and T2DM and explore possible interaction with other antidiabetic drugs.
    This cross-sectional study was based on data from the Swedish BPSD register. A total of 3745 patients with AD and antidiabetic drug treatment were included. Associations and interactions between antidiabetic drugs and BPSD were investigated by binary logistic regression.
    The use of metformin was associated with lower odds for symptoms of depression (OR 0.77, CI (95%) 0.61-0.96, p = 0.022) and anxiety (OR 0.74, CI (95%) 0.58-0.94, p = 0.015) after adjustment for age, gender, specific diagnosis, and drugs. We could not demonstrate this association with another antidiabetic drug. Interaction effects were limited to an increasing association in eating and appetite disorders using metformin and other antidiabetic drugs (i.e., drugs other than insulin, sulfonylurea, or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors).
    The result of this study suggests that metformin could be beneficial for patients diagnosed with AD, other than for blood glucose control. Although, more knowledge is needed before assigning metformin a role in treating BPSD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生活在疗养院中的大多数患有痴呆症的老年人表现出痴呆症的行为和心理症状(BPSD)。这种行为是居民难以应付的。为了实施个性化综合治疗,早期识别BPSD很重要,护理人员处于独特的位置,可以始终如一地观察居民的行为。本研究的目的是探讨护理人员观察老年痴呆症患者BPSD的经验。选择了通用的定性设计。对护理人员进行了12次半结构化访谈,直到数据饱和。采用归纳主题分析法对数据进行分析。确定了四个主题:从群体角度观察“群体和谐”,专注于群体和谐的干扰;一种“直观的方法”,这包括无意识地观察,没有一套固定的方法;“反应性干预”,这是指在不探索行为原因的情况下立即消除观察到的触发因素;和“共享信息”,这是与其他学科延迟分享观察到的行为。护理人员观察BPSD并在多学科团队中分享观察结果的当前方式解释了通过个性化综合治疗实现BPSD高治疗保真度的几个现有障碍。因此,必须对护理人员进行教育,使其在方法上构建日常观察,并改善跨专业合作,以及时分享他们的信息。
    The majority of older adults with dementia living in a nursing home exhibit behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). This behavior is difficult for residents to cope with. Early recognition of BPSD is important in order to implement personalized integrated treatment, and nursing staff are in the unique position to consistently observe residents\' behavior. The aim of this study was to explore nursing staff\'s experiences observing BPSD of nursing home residents with dementia. A generic qualitative design was chosen. Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with nursing staff members until data saturation. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Four themes were identified: \"group harmony\" observations from a group perspective, focused on the disturbance of group harmony; an \"intuitive approach\", which involves observing unconsciously and without a set method; \"reactive intervention\", which refers to immediate removal of observed triggers without exploring the causes of behaviors; and \"sharing information\", which is delayed sharing of observed behavior with other disciplines. The current way in which nursing staff observe BPSD and share observations within the multidisciplinary team explain several existing barriers to achieving high treatment fidelity for BPSD with personalized integrated treatment. Therefore, nursing staff must be educated to structure their daily observations methodologically and interprofessional collaboration improved to share their information in a timely manner.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:在超过90%的阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者中观察到痴呆(BPSD)的行为和心理症状。如果早期检测并适当管理,BPSD是可以补救的。阿尔茨海默病评定量表(BEHAVE-AD)和经验性BEHAVE-AD(E-BEHAVE-AD)中的行为病理学旨在鉴定BPSD。这项研究的目的是验证和准备波斯语BEHAVE-AD和E-BEHAVE-AD,用于临床和研究应用。
    UNASSIGNED:通过有意和方便的采样相结合选择了120名患者。所有参与者均应符合NINCDS-ADRDA工作组关于阿尔茨海默病临床诊断的标准。使用功能评估分期工具(FAST)来确定AD进展的速率。所有患者均使用BEHAVE-BEHAVE-AD问卷进行评估,以及波斯语版本的神经精神调查问卷(NPI-Q)和迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)。根据专家小组的意见,基于波斯语和两个量表的原始版本的兼容性确定内容有效性指数(CVI)。MMSE与BEHAVE-AD和E-BEHAVE-AD的相关性以及FAST对AD进展连续体的BPSD模式被认为是构建有效性的指标。通过将NPI-Q得分与BEHAVE-AD和E-BEHAVE-AD得分相关联来估计并发效度。对于这两种尺度,提取评分者间可靠性作为可靠性指标。
    未经评估:BEHAVE-AD量表的皮尔逊相关系数如下:使用NPI-Q(r=0.77,p值<0.01),MMSE(r=-0.34,p值<0.01),指示并发和构造有效性,分别。E-BEHAVE-AD的结果如下:NPI-Q-total(r=0.59,p值<0.01),和MMSE(r=0.31,p值<0。01).根据FAST,BEHANG-AD和E-BEHANG-AD评分与AD严重程度平行增加,但不是在最严重的AD阶段。曲线下面积对于BEHAVE-AD估计为0.84(p值<0.001),对于E-BEHAVE-AD估计为0.78(p值<0.001)。BEHAVE-BEHAVE-AD评分之间的相关性为0.45至0.63。BEHAVE-AD的评估者间可靠性指数范围为0.88至0.99,E-BEHAVE-AD的评估者间可靠性指数范围为0.74至0.95。
    UNASSIGNED:波斯版本的BEHAVE-BEHAVE-AD对于评估AD患者的BPSD是有效且可靠的。
    UNASSIGNED: Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are observed in more than 90% of patients with Alzheimer\'s disease (AD). BPSDs are remediable if detected early and managed appropriately. Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer\'s disease Rating Scale (BEHAVE-AD) and Empirical BEHAVE-AD (E-BEHAVE-AD) were designed to identify BPSD. The aim of this study is to validate and prepare BEHAVE-AD and E-BEHAVE-AD in Persian language for clinical and research applications.
    UNASSIGNED: 120 patients were selected through a combination of intentional and convenience sampling. All participants should fulfill the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group criteria for a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer\'s disease. Functional Assessment Staging Tool (FAST) was used to determine the rate of AD progression. All patients were evaluated using the BEHAVE-AD and E-BEHAVE-AD questionnaires, as well as the Persian version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The Content Validity Index (CVI) is determined based on the compatibility of the Persian and the original version of the two scales according to the opinion of expert panels. Correlation of MMSE with BEHAVE-AD and E-BEHAVE-AD as well as the BPSD pattern on AD progression continuum by FAST were considered as indices of construct validity. Concurrent validity was estimated by correlating NPI-Q scores with BEHAVE-AD and E-BEHAVE-AD scores. For both scales, interrater reliability was extracted as a reliability index.
    UNASSIGNED: Pearson correlation coefficients for the BEHAVE-AD scale were as follows: with NPI-Q (r = 0.77, p-value <0.01), with MMSE (r = -0.34, p-value <0.01), indicating concurrent and construct validity, respectively. The result for E-BEHAVE-AD was as follows: with NPI-Q-total (r = 0.59, p-value <0.01), and with MMSE (r = 0.31, p-value <0. 01). BEHAVE-AD and E-BEHAVE-AD scores increased in parallel with AD severity according to FAST, but not on the most severe AD stage. The area under the curve was estimated to be 0.84 (p-value <0.001) for BEHAVE-AD and 0.78 (p-value <0.001) for E-BEHAVE-AD. Correlation between BEHAVE-AD and E-BEHAVE-AD scores ranged from 0.45 to 0.63. The inter-rater reliability index ranged from 0.88 to 0.99 for BEHAVE-AD and from 0.74 to 0.95 for E-BEHAVE-AD.
    UNASSIGNED: The Persian version of BEHAVE-AD and E-BEHAVE-AD is valid and reliable for the assessment of BPSD in patients with AD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:痴呆症是全球公共卫生的优先事项。痴呆症的行为和心理症状(BPSD)的管理是目前面临的最高挑战之一,需要新的方法。在这种情况下,痴呆症和BPSD患者的特殊护理单位(SCU-B)被视为进一步的医疗干预措施。
    目的:本研究旨在探索SCU-B单元,以描述其与不同实施环境相关的主要特征,确定其可复制性的特征,并考察SCU-B单位推动的社会创新要素。
    方法:这项定性研究基于焦点小组(FG)和涉及9个国际中心的访谈。其中五个中心有记忆诊所和SCU-B,相比之下,只有六个有记忆诊所。总共举行了18个FGs,共有164名参与者。所有数据都逐字转录,并通过内容分析和SWOT(优势,弱点,机遇,和威胁)分析。
    结果:定性分析提供了SCU-B模型作为BPSD创新护理单位的愿景,促进长期护理(LTC)领域的社会创新。该系统主要针对痴呆症患者和BPSD患者及其非正式护理人员,但鼓励痴呆症护理利益相关者在微观和中观层面进行合作。
    结论:国家LTC系统的具体特征和专业单位的组织是SCU-B经验成功的决定因素。整个SCU-B模型的可复制性被认为较低;然而,构成SCU-B模型的单一要素的实施可以促进创新。本研究为如何实施SCU-B单元和创新的痴呆症护理解决方案提供了相关建议。
    Dementia is a priority for global public health. The management of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) is one of the highest ongoing challenges and needs new approaches. The special care unit for people with dementia and BPSD (SCU-B) is viewed in this context as a further medical intervention.
    this study aims to explore SCU-B units in order to describe their main characteristics in relation to different implementation contexts, identify the characteristics of their replicability, and examine the social innovation elements promoted by SCU-B units.
    This qualitative study is based on focus groups (FGs) and interviews involving nine international centers. Five of the centers have a memory clinic unit and SCU-B, compared with six that only have a memory clinic unit. A total number of 18 FGs were held, which altogether involved 164 participants. All data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed by means of a content analysis and a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis.
    The qualitative analysis offers a vision of the SCU-B model as an innovative care unit for BPSD, promoting social innovation in the long-term care (LTC) sector. This system mainly targets people with dementia and BPSD and their informal caregivers but encourages collaboration between dementia care stakeholders at the micro and meso levels.
    Specific characteristics of the country\'s LTC systems and the organization of specialized units are determinants for the success of the SCU-B experience. The replicability of the entire SCU-B model was considered low; however, the implementation of single elements composing the SCU-B model may foster innovation. This study provides relevant suggestions on how to implement the SCU-B unit and innovative solutions for dementia care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有限的研究已经研究了如何在老年痴呆症患者的疗养院中实施基于自然的姑息康复,尽管有证据表明这些花园没有得到充分利用.本文将介绍与痴呆症患者疗养院跨学科合作设计的干预研究的研究方案,制定量身定制的基于自然的姑息康复计划,以增加花园的合格使用,以促进一系列健康成果。
    该研究是单套管准实验混合方法研究。将制定干预措施,设计,并与疗养院合作实施,使用不同的协同设计工具和方法。干预的效果将使用神经精神清单疗养院版本结合药物使用进行评估,一项关于员工倦怠的调查,和摄像机在花园里登记花园使用。由研究中的各个利益相关者组成的单一和焦点小组访谈的过程评估将用于获得有关干预过程和实施的知识。
    本文介绍了使用疗养院花园为痴呆症患者提供姑息康复领域的新方法,通过跨学科合作,参与式共同设计方法和混合方法设计。同时使用效果和过程评估,这项研究将为参与过程的作用和重要性提供独特的见解,跨学科合作,并根据当地需求和愿望在疗养院的花园中进行姑息康复活动。这些结果可用于指导未来的其他养老院和更新项目。
    ISRCTN,ISRCTN14095773.2022年7月15日注册-追溯注册。
    A limited amount of research has examined how nature-based palliative rehabilitation can be implemented in nursing homes for people with dementia, even though evidence suggests that these gardens are underused. This paper will present the study protocol of an intervention study co-designed in an interdisciplinary collaboration with a nursing home for people with dementia, to develop a tailored nature-based palliative rehabilitation program to increase qualified use of garden with the purpose of promoting a range of health outcomes.
    The study is a single-cased quasi-experimental mixed methods study. The intervention will be developed, designed, and implemented in collaboration with the nursing home, using different co-design tools and methods. The effect of the intervention will be evaluated using the The Neuropsychiatric Inventory Nursing Home version in combination with medication use, a survey on staff burnout, and cameras in the garden to register garden use. A process evaluation with single- and focus group interviews consisting of various stakeholders in the study will be used to gain knowledge on the intervention processes and implementation.
    The paper presents new approaches in the field of palliative rehabilitation for people with dementia using nursing home gardens, through interdisciplinary collaboration, participatory co-design approach and mixed methods design. Using both effect and process evaluation, the study will provide unique insights in the role and importance of participatory process, interdisciplinary collaboration, and tailoring palliative rehabilitation activities in gardens at nursing homes to local needs and wishes. These results can be used to guide other nursing homes and renewal projects in the future.
    ISRCTN, ISRCTN14095773 . Registered 15 July 2022-Retrospectively registered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:幻觉是路易体痴呆(DLB)和帕金森病(PDD)的核心特征性症状。它也可能出现在阿尔茨海默病(AD)的晚期。他们不容易管理,它们与认知能力下降有关,早期的制度化,死亡率增加,增加了护理人员的负担。
    方法:这是交叉RCT。参与者被随机分为6个不同的组,每组10名患者。
    方法:60名痴呆患者(不同类型和阶段的痴呆)。
    方法:使用的三种非药物干预措施是:A)心理教育计划中的验证疗法(VT),B)回忆疗法(RT)和C)音乐疗法(MT)。每次干预持续5天,间隔2天,作为洗脱期(所有干预措施的持续时间为3周)。
    方法:基线时使用的测量是:MMSE,ACE-R,GDS,基线和每次干预后的FRSDD和NPI问卷。
    结果:减少幻觉的最有效组合是:VT/心理教育计划(p=0.005),MT(p=0.007)和RT(p=0.022)。相同的组合适用于照顾者的痛苦:VT/心理教育计划(p=0.010)-MT(p=0.023)-RT(p=0.036)。
    结论:VT/心理教育计划,其次是MT,其次是RT是一种有效的非药物干预组合,可以减少痴呆患者的幻觉和照顾者的负担。应进一步检查非药物干预措施,作为减少痴呆症幻觉的有效替代方法。
    OBJECTIVE: Hallucinations is a core characteristic symptom in Lewy Body Dementia (DLB) and Parkinson\'s Dementia (PDD). It may also appear at the late stages of Alzheimer\'s disease (AD). They are not easily managed, and they are associated with cognitive decline, earlier institutionalization, increased mortality, and increased caregivers\' burden.
    METHODS: This is a cross-over RCT. The participants were randomly assigned in 6 different groups of 10 patients each.
    METHODS: 60 dementia patients (different types and stages of dementia).
    METHODS: The three non-pharmacological interventions used are: A) Validation therapy (VT) in a Psycho-educational program, B) Reminiscence therapy (RT) and C) Music therapy (MT). Each intervention lasted for 5 days and there was an interval of two days, as a wash-out period (all the interventions had a duration of 3 weeks).
    METHODS: The measurements which were used at baseline were: MMSE, ACE-R, GDS, FRSDD and NPI questionnaire at baseline and after each intervention.
    RESULTS: The most effective combination for the reduction of the hallucinations is: VT/Psycho-educational program (p = 0.005), MT (p = 0.007) and RT (p = 0.022). The same combination applies for the caregivers\' distress: VT/Psychoeducational program (p = 0.010) - MT (p = 0.023) - RT (p = 0.036).
    CONCLUSIONS: VT/Psycho-educational program followed by MT, followed by RT is an effective combination of non-pharmacological interventions that can reduce hallucinations in patients with dementia and caregivers\' burden. Non-pharmacological interventions should be further examined as an effective alternative for the reduction of the hallucinations in dementia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号