背景:(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖是许多真菌分泌的全真菌生物标志物,包括Madurellamycetomatis,Eumycetoma的主要病原体。以前,我们证明(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖存在于Eumycetoma患者的血清中。然而,尚未评估使用(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖监测大肠埃希菌瘤患者的治疗反应。
方法:在本研究中,我们用WAKO(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖测定法测定了104例每天接受400mg伊曲康唑治疗的eumycetoma患者的血清中(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖浓度,或每周200毫克或300毫克福鲁康唑。在七个不同的时间点测量系列血清(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖浓度。评估初始和最终(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖浓度与临床结果之间的任何相关性。
结果:在总共654份血清样品中获得(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖的浓度。治疗前,(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖的平均浓度为22.86pg/mL。在治疗的前6个月,该浓度保持稳定。(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖浓度在手术后显著下降至8.56μg/mL。治疗停止后,18例患者有复发的临床证据.这18名患者中有7名患者的(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖浓度高于5.5pg/mL阳性临界值,而在其余11名患者中,(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖浓度低于截断值。这导致38.9%的灵敏度和75.0%的特异性。注意到病变大小与(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖浓度之间的相关性。
结论:尽管通常可以在治疗期间测量eumycetoma患者血清中的(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖浓度,β-葡聚糖浓度仅在手术后出现急剧下降,而在抗菌治疗期间或之后并未出现.(1,3)-β-D-葡聚糖浓度不能预测复发,并且似乎在确定eumycetoma患者对唑类药物的治疗反应方面没有价值。
BACKGROUND: (1,3)-β-D-glucan is a panfungal biomarker secreted by many fungi, including Madurella mycetomatis, the main causative agent of eumycetoma. Previously we demonstrated that (1,3)-β-D-glucan was present in serum of patients with eumycetoma. However, the use of (1,3)-β-D-glucan to monitor treatment responses in patients with eumycetoma has not been evaluated.
METHODS: In this study, we measured (1,3)-β-D-glucan concentrations in serum with the WAKO (1,3)-β-D-glucan assay in 104 patients with eumycetoma treated with either 400 mg itraconazole daily, or 200 mg or 300 mg fosravuconazole weekly. Serial serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan concentrations were measured at seven different timepoints. Any correlation between initial and final (1,3)-β-D-glucan concentrations and clinical outcome was evaluated.
RESULTS: The concentration of (1,3)-β-D-glucan was obtained in a total of 654 serum samples. Before treatment, the average (1,3)-β-D-glucan concentration was 22.86 pg/mL. During the first 6 months of treatment, this concentration remained stable. (1,3)-β-D-glucan concentrations significantly dropped after surgery to 8.56 pg/mL. After treatment was stopped, there was clinical evidence of recurrence in 18 patients. Seven of these 18 patients had a (1,3)-β-D-glucan concentration above the 5.5 pg/mL cut-off value for positivity, while in the remaining 11 patients, (1,3)-β-D-glucan concentrations were below the cut-off value. This resulted in a sensitivity of 38.9% and specificity of 75.0%. A correlation between lesion size and (1,3)-β-D-glucan concentration was noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Although in general (1,3)-β-D-glucan concentrations can be measured in the serum of patients with eumycetoma during treatment, a sharp decrease in β-glucan concentration was only noted after surgery and not during or after antimicrobial treatment. (1,3)-β-D-glucan concentrations were not predictive for recurrence and seem to have no value in determining treatment response to azoles in patients with eumycetoma.