Atrial fibrillation

心房颤动
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    亚临床小叶血栓形成(SLT)可能是经导管主动脉瓣植入(TAVI)后经导管心脏瓣膜(THV)衰竭的原因之一。我们试图阐明TAVI围手术期SLT和血栓形成的形成过程。这个多中心,prospective,单臂介入研究纳入了2018年9月至2022年9月期间26例房颤患者接受依度沙班治疗,严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者接受TAVI治疗.我们调查了18例患者在TAVI后1周至3个月之间通过对比增强计算机断层扫描检测到的最大小叶厚度的变化,并通过总血栓形成分析系统(T-TAS)测量了血栓形成性,并通过计算流体动力学(CFD)测量了流量停滞量(n=11)。1周时SLT为16.7%(3/18),但在TAVI后3个月下降至5.9%(1/17)。与没有SLT的患者相比,在1周时患有SLT的患者的最大小叶厚度显着降低。通过T-TAS评估的血栓形成性在1周时显着降低,在3个月时趋于增加。通过CFD评估的停滞体积与更高的最大小叶厚度呈正相关。这项研究显示了TAVI后急性期THV新窦小叶血栓形成的过程和停滞的可视化。
    Subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) can be one of the causes of transcatheter heart valve (THV) failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We sought to clarify the formation process of SLT and thrombogenicity during the perioperative period of TAVI. This multicenter, prospective, single-arm interventional study enrolled 26 patients treated with edoxaban for atrial fibrillation and who underwent TAVI for severe aortic stenosis between September 2018 and September 2022. We investigated changes in maximal leaflet thickness detected by contrast-enhanced computed tomography between 1 week and 3 months after TAVI in 18 patients and measured the thrombogenicity by Total Thrombus-formation Analysis System (T-TAS) and flow stagnation volume by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) (n = 11). SLT was observed in 16.7% (3/18) at 1 week, but decreased to 5.9% (1/17) at 3 months after TAVI. Patients with SLT at 1 week had a significantly decreased maximal leaflet thickness compared to those without SLT. Thrombogenicity assessed by T-TAS decreased markedly at 1 week and tended to increase at 3 months. The stagnation volume assessed by CFD was positively associated with a higher maximum leaflet thickness. This study showed the course of leaflet thrombus formation and visualization of stagnation in neo-sinus of THV in the acute phase after TAVI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    特发性心房颤动(AF)患者从仰卧位到站立位过渡期间的血液动力学反应尚未完全了解。本研究旨在分析特发性房颤患者在抬头倾斜试验期间发生的血液动力学变化。我们调查了40例房颤患者(12例房颤节律-AFr和28例窦性心律-AFsr)和38例非房颤对照的平头倾斜试验期间的血流动力学变化。与AFsr和非AF相比,AFr患者在站立后SVI降低减弱[ΔSVI,以mL/m2为单位:-1.3(-3.4至1.7)与-6.4(-17.3至-0.1)与-11.8(-18.7至-8.0),分别为;p<0.001]。AFr中的PVRI降低,但AFsr和非AF中的PVRI升高[ΔPVRI以达因为单位。seg.m2/cm5:-477(-1148至82.5)与131(-525至887)vs.357(-29到681),分别为;p<0.01]。同样,与非房颤患者相比,AFr患者在站立后也有更大的HR和更大的CI增加。对体位性挑战的血液动力学反应表明,房颤节律患者与恢复为窦性心律或健康对照者之间的适应差异。表征血流动力学表型可能与AF患者的个体化治疗相关。
    The hemodynamic response during the transition from the supine to standing position in idiopathic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is not completely understood. This study aimed to analyze the hemodynamic changes that occur during the head-up tilt test in idiopathic AF patients. We investigated the hemodynamic changes during the head-up tilt test with impedance cardiography in 40 AF patients (12 with AF rhythm-AFr and 28 with sinus rhythm-AFsr) and 38 non-AF controls. Patients with AFr had attenuated SVI decrease after standing when compared to AFsr and non-AF [ΔSVI in mL/m2: -1.3 (-3.4 to 1.7) vs. -6.4 (-17.3 to -0.1) vs. -11.8 (-18.7 to -8.0), respectively; p < 0.001]. PVRI decreased in AFr but increased in AFsr and non-AF [ΔPVRI in dyne.seg.m2/cm5: -477 (-1148 to 82.5) vs. 131 (-525 to 887) vs. 357 (-29 to 681), respectively; p < 0.01]. Similarly, compared with non-AF patients, AFr patients also had a greater HR and greater CI increase after standing. The haemodynamic response to orthostatic challenge suggests differential adaptations between patients with AF rhythm and those reverted to sinus rhythm or healthy controls. Characterizing the hemodynamic phenotype may be relevant for the individualized treatment of AF patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:用于心房颤动(AF)的药物开发未能产生新的批准的化合物。我们试图在人类遗传学的支持下确定并优先考虑潜在的药物靶标,通过将现有证据与与AF药物开发相关的生物信息学来源相结合。
    方法:通过MEDLINE的结构化搜索鉴定了AF和相关性状的遗传命中。来自每篇论文的基因与药物相互作用的OpenTargets平台交叉引用。通过在MEDLINE和ClinialTrials.gov上对每种药物及其与AF的关联进行结构化搜索和证据审查,证明了确认/验证。
    结果:鉴定出613种独特的药物,其中21项已纳入AF指南。目前未用于房颤的心血管药物(例如雷诺嗪和卡百利肽)和抗炎药(例如地塞米松和甲泼尼龙)具有潜在益处的证据。进一步的目标被认为是可药用的,但仍可用于药物开发。
    结论:我们的系统方法,结合来自不同生物信息学平台的证据,确定了房颤的药物再利用机会和药物靶标。
    背景:KK得到了Barts慈善补助金G-002089的支持,并得到了AFGen2023-24奖学金的指导,该奖学金由AFGenNIH/NHLBI补助金R01HL092577资助。RP由UCLBHF研究加速器AA/18/6/34223和NIHR授予NIHR129463支持。AFS得到了BHF赠款PG/18/5033837,PG/22/10989和UCLBHF加速器AA/18/6/34223以及英国研究与创新(UKRI)的支持,这些资金由英国政府的HorizonEurope资金保证EP/Z000211/1和UKRI-NIHR赠款/V3867/1用于多药机制和疗法研究。AF由UCLBHF加速器AA/18/6/34223支持。CF由UCLBHF加速器AA/18/6/34223支持。
    BACKGROUND: Drug development for atrial fibrillation (AF) has failed to yield new approved compounds. We sought to identify and prioritise potential druggable targets with support from human genetics, by integrating the available evidence with bioinformatics sources relevant for AF drug development.
    METHODS: Genetic hits for AF and related traits were identified through structured search of MEDLINE. Genes derived from each paper were cross-referenced with the OpenTargets platform for drug interactions. Confirmation/validation was demonstrated through structured searches and review of evidence on MEDLINE and ClinialTrials.gov for each drug and its association with AF.
    RESULTS: 613 unique drugs were identified, with 21 already included in AF Guidelines. Cardiovascular drugs from classes not currently used for AF (e.g. ranolazine and carperitide) and anti-inflammatory drugs (e.g. dexamethasone and mehylprednisolone) had evidence of potential benefit. Further targets were considered druggable but remain open for drug development.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic approach, combining evidence from different bioinformatics platforms, identified drug repurposing opportunities and druggable targets for AF.
    BACKGROUND: KK is supported by Barts Charity grant G-002089 and is mentored on the AFGen 2023-24 Fellowship funded by the AFGen NIH/NHLBI grant R01HL092577. RP is supported by the UCL BHF Research Accelerator AA/18/6/34223 and NIHR grant NIHR129463. AFS is supported by the BHF grants PG/18/5033837, PG/22/10989 and UCL BHF Accelerator AA/18/6/34223 as well as the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) under the UK government\'s Horizon Europe funding guarantee EP/Z000211/1 and by the UKRI-NIHR grant MR/V033867/1 for the Multimorbidity Mechanism and Therapeutics Research Collaboration. AF is supported by UCL BHF Accelerator AA/18/6/34223. CF is supported by UCL BHF Accelerator AA/18/6/34223.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:可以使用智能手表和手持式ECG记录仪等广泛可用的设备记录单导联心电图(ECG)。这种装置已被批准用于心房颤动(AF)检测。然而,关于单导联心电图解释的可靠性的证据很少。我们的目的是评估独立心脏病专家对单导联心电图检测房颤的一致性水平。并确定影响协议的因素。
    方法:在一项基于人群的房颤筛查研究中,≥65岁的成年人使用手持式ECG记录仪每天记录4个单导联ECG,持续1-4周.一名护士确认了显示可能房颤迹象的心电图,由自动算法辅助。这些由两名独立的心脏病专家进行审查,他们分配了参与者和ECG水平的诊断。使用线性加权Cohen'skappa(kw)计算房颤诊断的评分者间可靠性。
    结果:在2,141名参与者和162,515名心电图中,来自185例参与者的仅1,843例心电图由两位心脏病学家进行审查.一致性是中等的:参与者水平的kw=0.48(95%CI,0.37-0.58);ECG水平的kw=0.58(0.53-0.62)。在参与者层面,协议与记录的质量足够的心电图数量有关,在记录至少67个质量足够的心电图的参与者中,他们的一致性更高。在心电图水平,一致性与ECG质量以及ECG是否表现出算法识别的可能AF相关。
    结论:发现在老年人中,单导联心电图诊断房颤的评估者间可靠性中等。提高可靠性的策略可能包括对参与者和心脏病专家进行培训,并设计房颤检测程序,以获得足够的心电图以进行可靠的诊断。
    OBJECTIVE: Single-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) can be recorded using widely available devices such as smartwatches and handheld ECG recorders. Such devices have been approved for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection. However, little evidence exists on the reliability of single-lead ECG interpretation. We aimed to assess the level of agreement on detection of AF by independent cardiologists interpreting single lead ECGs, and to identify factors influencing agreement.
    METHODS: In a population-based AF screening study, adults aged ≥65 years old recorded four single-lead ECGs per day for 1-4 weeks using a handheld ECG recorder. ECGs showing signs of possible AF were identified by a nurse, aided by an automated algorithm. These were reviewed by two independent cardiologists who assigned participant- and ECG-level diagnoses. Inter-rater reliability of AF diagnosis was calculated using linear weighted Cohen\'s kappa (kw).
    RESULTS: Out of 2,141 participants and 162,515 ECGs, only 1,843 ECGs from 185 participants were reviewed by both cardiologists. Agreement was moderate: kw = 0.48 (95% CI, 0.37-0.58) at participant-level; and kw = 0.58 (0.53-0.62) at ECG-level. At participant-level, agreement was associated with the number of adequate-quality ECGs recorded, with higher agreement in participants who recorded at least 67 adequate-quality ECGs. At ECG-level, agreement was associated with ECG quality and whether ECGs exhibited algorithm-identified possible AF.
    CONCLUSIONS: Inter-rater reliability of AF diagnosis from single-lead ECGs was found to be moderate in older adults. Strategies to improve reliability might include participant and cardiologist training and designing AF detection programmes to obtain sufficient ECGs for reliable diagnoses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心房颤动(AFib)是最常见的心律紊乱,通常通过电复律治疗。节奏恢复后,一段被称为心房顿抑的机械功能下降的时期发生,表明AFib中存在收缩性缺陷,并在恢复节律时显示出来。该项目旨在定义AFib中发生的收缩重塑。为了评估收缩功能,我们使用了犬诱发AFib的心房速动模型。质谱分析显示,与窦性心律心房相比,AFib样品中的收缩蛋白失调。心房心肌细胞收缩力降低,减少静息紧张,皮肤单个心肌细胞研究中的钙敏感性增加。这些改变与肌丝蛋白的降解相关,包括肌球蛋白重链改变收缩力,Titin改变静息张力,和TnI改变钙敏感性。我们测量了其他肌丝蛋白的降解,包括cMyBP-C和肌动蛋白,与窦性心律心房相比,AFib样品中显示出明显的降解。许多蛋白质降解产物表现为通过钙蛋白酶蛋白水解产生的离散裂解产物。我们评估了钙蛋白酶活性,发现它显着增加。这些结果提供了对AFib中发生的收缩重塑的理解,并提供了对AFib中心房顿抑和心房血栓和中风风险增加的分子解释的见解。
    Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is the most common cardiac rhythm disturbance, often treated via electrical cardioversion. Following rhythm restoration, a period of depressed mechanical function known as atrial stunning occurs, suggesting that defects in contractility occur in AFib and are revealed upon restoration of rhythm. This project aims to define the contractile remodeling that occurs in AFib. To assess contractile function, we used a canine atrial tachypacing model of induced AFib. Mass spectrometry analysis showed dysregulation of contractile proteins in samples from AFib compared to sinus rhythm atria. Atrial cardiomyocytes showed reduced force of contraction, decreased resting tension, and increased calcium sensitivity in skinned single cardiomyocyte studies. These alterations correlated with degradation of myofilament proteins including myosin heavy chain altering force of contraction, titin altering resting tension, and TnI altering calcium sensitivity. We measured degradation of other myofilament proteins including cMyBP-C and actininshowing significant degradation in the AFib samples compared to sinus rhythm atria. Many of the protein degradation products appeared as discrete cleavage products that are generated by calpain proteolysis. We assessed calpain activity and found it to be significantly increased. These results provide an understanding of the contractile remodeling that occurs in AFib and provide insight into the molecular explanation for atrial stunning and the increased risk of atrial thrombus and stroke in AFib.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    左心室(LV)舒张功能障碍,心房颤动(AF)和射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)具有共同的危险因素,且两者相互密切相关,并与不良心血管事件密切相关.房颤患者的劳力性呼吸困难应触发全面的左心室舒张功能评估,因为房颤通常先于HFpEF。超声心动图评估房颤患者的左心室舒张功能具有挑战性,主要是因为周期长度的可变性,没有心房收缩,无论左心室充盈压(LVFP)如何,LA扩大的频繁发生。2016年左心室舒张功能评估建议的算法不能直接应用于此设置。这篇综述讨论了房颤患者舒张功能评估和HFpEF诊断的可用方法。根据现有数据,房颤患者舒张功能评价的一个合理的临床目标是得出一个二元结论:LVFP升高与否。最近,一种两步算法,结合了几个超声心动图参数加上体重指数,已被建议在房颤患者中区分正常和升高的LVFP。在选定的情况下,超声心动图评估必须辅以彻底的临床评估以及利钠肽和心导管插入术。如果无法确定HFpEF的诊断,建议密切随访,及时识别舒张功能障碍标志物,同时监测和纠正可改变的危险因素.
    Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction, atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) share common risk factors and are closely related to each other and to adverse cardiovascular events. Exertional dyspnea in patients with AF should trigger comprehensive LV diastolic function evaluation since AF frequently precedes incident HFpEF. Echocardiographic assessment of LV diastolic function in patients with AF is challenging, mainly because of variability in cycle length, the absence of atrial contraction, and the frequent occurrence of LA enlargement regardless of LV filling pressures (LVFP). The algorithm of the 2016 recommendations for the evaluation of LV diastolic function cannot be directly applied in this setting. This review discusses the modalities available for diastolic function assessment and HFpEF diagnosis in patients with AF. Based on currently available data, a reasonable clinical target of diastolic function evaluation in AF would be to reach a binary conclusion: LVFP elevated or not. Recently, a two-step algorithm that combined several echocardiographic parameters plus inclusion of body mass index, has been proposed to differentiate normal from elevated LVFP in patients with AF. The echocardiographic evaluation must be complemented by a thorough clinical evaluation along with natriuretic peptides and cardiac catheterization in selected cases. If a diagnosis of HFpEF cannot be ascertained, a close follow up for timely identification of diastolic dysfunction markers along with monitoring and correction of modifiable risk factors are recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:为了描述其基本原理,设计,STEEER-AF的给药和基线特征(卒中预防和节律控制治疗:一项针对心房颤动患者的欧洲心脏病学会[ESC]的教育计划的评估).
    结果:STEEER-AF是一项务实的试验,旨在客观而有力地确定常规实践中是否遵守指南,并评估针对医疗保健专业人员的有针对性的教育计划。在6个国家随机分配了70个中心(法国,德国,意大利,波兰,西班牙和英国;2022-2023年)。STEEER-AF中心招募了1732名诊断为房颤(AF)的患者,平均年龄68.9岁(SD11.7),CHA2DS2-VASc评分3.2(SD1.8)和647(37%)女性。843例(49%)房颤患者和760例(44%)窦性心律患者。1,543例患者(89%)进行了口服抗凝治疗,大多数接受直接口服抗凝药(1,378;89%)。以前的心脏复律,836例患者(48.3%)接受抗心律失常药物治疗或消融治疗.551名患者(31.8%)目前正在接受抗心律失常药物,446例(25.8%)计划接受未来的心脏复律或消融.该教育计划邀请了195名医疗专业人员,这些专业人员随机分配到干预组,由定制的交互式在线学习和强化活动组成,由国家专家培训师支持。
    结论:STEEER-AF试验成功部署在六个欧洲国家,以调查现实世界实践中的指南依从性。并评估针对医疗保健专业人员的结构化教育计划是否可以改善患者级别的护理。
    背景:Clinicaltrials.govNCT04396418。
    OBJECTIVE: To describe the rationale, design, delivery and baseline characteristics of STEEER-AF (Stroke prevention and rhythm control Treatment: Evaluation of an Educational programme of the European Society of Cardiology [ESC] in a cluster-Randomised trial in patients with Atrial Fibrillation).
    RESULTS: STEEER-AF is a pragmatic trial designed to objectively and robustly determine whether guidelines are adhered to in routine practice, and evaluate a targeted educational programme for healthcare professionals. Seventy centres were randomised in 6 countries (France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain and United Kingdom; 2022-2023). STEEER-AF centres recruited 1732 patients with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), with mean age 68.9 years (SD 11.7), CHA2DS2-VASc score 3.2 (SD 1.8) and 647 (37%) women. 843 patients (49%) were in AF and 760 (44%) in sinus rhythm at enrolment. Oral anticoagulant therapy was prescribed in 1,543 patients (89%), with the majority receiving direct oral anticoagulants (1,378; 89%). Previous cardioversion, antiarrhythmic drug therapy or ablation was recorded in 836 patients (48.3%). 551 patients (31.8%) were currently receiving an antiarrhythmic drug, and 446 (25.8%) were scheduled to receive a future cardioversion or ablation. The educational programme engaged 195 healthcare professionals across centres randomised to the intervention group, consisting of bespoke interactive online learning and reinforcement activities, supported by national expert trainers.
    CONCLUSIONS: The STEEER-AF trial was successfully deployed across six European countries to investigate guideline adherence in real-world practice, and evaluate if a structured educational programme for healthcare professionals can improve patient-level care.
    BACKGROUND: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04396418.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:格利福净被推荐为心力衰竭和/或心血管合并症患者的一线治疗,并被证明可以减少心房颤动(AF)的发生。然而,尚不清楚哪种格列净在降低房颤发生率方面产生更大的心脏保护作用。因此,我们的目的是比较与不同gliflozins相关的房颤复发数据.
    方法:对在线科学图书馆(从开始到2023年6月1日)进行了准确的搜索。59项研究被纳入荟萃分析,涉及108026例患者,其中60097人接受了gliflozins,47929人接受了安慰剂。
    结果:格利福净在总体人群中相对于标准护理治疗,房颤发生率有统计学意义的显著降低(相对风险[RR]:0.8880,95%CI:[0.8059;0.9784],p=.0164)和糖尿病和心肾疾病患者(RR:0.8352,95%CI:[0.7219;0.9663],p=.0155)。与安慰剂相比,达格列净显著降低了房颤发生率(0.7259[0.6337;0.8316],p<.0001)在总体人口中,糖尿病患者(RR:0.2482,95%CI:[0.0682;0.9033],p=.0345),与心肾疾病相关的糖尿病(RR:0.7192,95%CI:[0.5679;0.9110],p=.0063)和在亚分析中,包括随访≥1年的研究(RR:0.7792,95%CI:[0.6508;0.9330],p=.0066)。在不同的gliflozins之间,在AF保护方面没有发现显着差异。
    结论:在总体人群和糖尿病患者中,与安慰剂相比,使用达格列净可显著降低房颤风险。而使用其他gliflozins并不能显著减少房颤的发生。
    BACKGROUND: Gliflozins are recommended as first-line treatment in patients with heart failure and/or cardiovascular comorbidities and are demonstrated to reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence. However, it is not well known which gliflozin yields the larger cardioprotection in terms of AF occurrence reduction. Hence, we aimed to compare data regarding AF recurrence associated with different gliflozins.
    METHODS: An accurate search of online scientific libraries (from inception to June 1, 2023) was performed. Fifty-nine studies were included in the meta-analysis involving 108 026 patients, of whom 60 097 received gliflozins and 47 929 received placebo.
    RESULTS: Gliflozins provided a statistically significant reduction of AF occurrence relative to standard of care therapy in the overall population (relative risks [RR]: 0.8880, 95% CI: [0.8059; 0.9784], p = .0164) and in patients with diabetes and cardiorenal diseases (RR: 0.8352, 95% CI: [0.7219; 0.9663], p = .0155). Dapagliflozin significantly decreased AF occurrence as compared to placebo (0.7259 [0.6337; 0.8316], p < .0001) in the overall population, in patients with diabetes (RR: 0.2482, 95% CI: [0.0682; 0.9033], p = .0345), with diabetes associated with cardiorenal diseases (RR: 0.7192, 95% CI: [0.5679; 0.9110], p = .0063) and in the subanalysis including studies with follow-up ≥1 year (RR: 0.7792, 95% CI: [0.6508; 0.9330], p = .0066). No significant differences in terms of AF protection were found among different gliflozins.
    CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin use was associated with significant reduction in AF risk as compared to placebo in overall population and patients with diabetes, whereas the use of other gliflozins did not significantly reduce AF occurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号