BACKGROUND: Cigar use among adults in the United States has remained relatively stable in the past decade and occupies a growing part of the tobacco marketplace as cigarette use has declined. While studies have established the detrimental respiratory health effects of cigarette use, the effects of cigar use need further characterization. In this study, we evaluate the prospective association between cigar use, with or without cigarettes, and asthma exacerbation.
METHODS: We used data from Waves 1-5 (2013-2019) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study to run generalized estimating equation models examining the association between time-varying, one-wave-lagged cigarette and cigar use and self-reported asthma exacerbation among US adults (18+). We defined our exposure as non-established (reference), former, exclusive cigarette, exclusive cigar, and dual use. We defined an asthma exacerbation event as a reported asthma attack in the past 12 months necessitating oral or injected steroid medication or asthma symptoms disrupting sleep at least once a week in the past 30 days. We adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, household income, health insurance, established electronic nicotine delivery systems use, cigarette pack-years, secondhand smoke exposure, obesity, and baseline asthma exacerbation.
RESULTS: Exclusive cigarette use (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.54) and dual use (IRR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.08-1.85) were associated with a higher rate of asthma exacerbation compared to non-established use, while former use (IRR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.80-1.28) and exclusive cigar use (IRR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.42-1.17) were not.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no association between exclusive cigar use and self-reported asthma exacerbation. However, exclusive cigarette use and dual cigarette and cigar use were associated with higher incidence rates of self-reported asthma exacerbation compared to non-established use. Studies should evaluate strategies to improve cigarette and cigar smoking cessation among adults with asthma who continue to smoke.

CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab, a biological therapy that blocks the shared receptor component for interleukins-4/13, reduced exacerbations and improved lung function in children with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma independent of most baseline patient and asthma characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by episodes of acute asthma exacerbations (AAEs), in addition to chronic airway inflammation, which has a huge impact on both the affected patients and their parents. The main objective of this study was to explore the utility of available white-blood-cell-derived inflammatory markers in diagnosing AAEs and identifying children at risk for severe exacerbations requiring admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study. The medical records of 128 children diagnosed with asthma exacerbation and 131 children with stable asthma between the ages of 2 and 12 years were reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 259 participants were enrolled. Children with AAE demonstrated significantly higher white blood cell counts (WBC: 10.0 ± 4.2 × 103/μL vs. 7.1 ± 2.2 × 103/μL, p < 0.001), absolute neutrophil counts (ANC: 7398.5 ± 4600 cells/μL vs. 2634.8 ± 1448 cells/μL, p < 0.001), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR: 7.0 ± 6.8 vs. 0.9 ± 0.7, p < 0.001) but significantly lower absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC: 1794.1 ± 1536 × 103/μL vs. 3552.9 ± 1509 × 103/μL, p < 0.001). Interestingly, blood eosinophil count displayed an opposite trend: children with stable asthma had significantly more eosinophils compared to those experiencing an exacerbation (370.1 ± 342.7 cells/mm3 vs. 0.9 ± 1.9 cells/mm3, p < 0.001). Two criteria that are indicative of AAE were identified: NLR values greater than 1.2, with good discriminative ability (area under the curve [AUC] 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.94; sensitivity 82.5%; specificity 79.5%), and ANC values exceeding 3866, with moderate discriminative ability (AUC 0.86; 95% CI 0.81-0.91; sensitivity 75.0%; specificity 82.3%). Moreover, a comparative analysis of these markers (NLR, ANC, PLR, WBC, AEC, and ALC) in patients with AAE did not demonstrate significant differences between those requiring PICU admission and those who did not require it.
CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes two major findings. The first is that NLR, ANC, WBC, and PLR are significantly higher in AAE patients compared to those with stable asthma. The second is that children with stable asthma have higher AEC and ALC levels compared to those with AAE. Furthermore, this study has revealed that the studied markers (NLR, ANC, PLR, WBC, AEC, and ALC) did not differentiate between AAE patients requiring PICU admission and those managed in the general ward, suggesting a need for alternative predictive factors.

Background: Asthma controller medications can be delivered via pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) or dry powder inhaler (DPI) devices. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of exacerbations and satisfaction rate with device use in asthmatics using pMDIs or DPIs. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in adults who used pMDIs or DPIs with correct inhaler technique and good adherence for asthma treatment. Demographic and asthma-related characteristics of the subjects and data regarding device satisfaction were collected through a face-to-face interview in the outpatient clinic. Rates of pMDI and DPI users and the data were compared between the two groups. Results: The study included 338 patients (mean age: 48.6 ± 14.5 years, 253 [74.9%] women). Among participants, 96 (28.4%) were using pMDI and 242 (71.6%) were using DPI. The age of patients using pMDI were significantly lower compared with DPI users. No significant difference was observed in terms of device satisfaction and clinical outcomes of asthma between pMDI and DPI users with good inhaler technique and good adherence. Conclusion: More asthmatics use DPIs, however, pMDIs are used in younger asthmatic patients. No significant difference in terms of device satisfaction and clinical outcomes of asthma was observed between pMDI and DPI users.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies have revealed associations between traffic-related pollutants such as diesel particulate matter (PM) and asthma outcomes in children, but the inflammatory features associated with diesel PM exposure in children with asthma are not understood.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate symptoms, exacerbations, and lung function measures in children with uncontrolled asthma and their associations with residential proximity to major roadways and to determine associations between diesel PM exposure and systemic inflammatory cytokines, circulating markers of T-cell activation and exhaustion, and metabolomic features using biomarker studies.
METHODS: Children 5 to 17 years of age with physician-diagnosed, uncontrolled asthma despite treatment with an asthma controller medication completed a research visit involving questionnaires, lung function testing, and venipuncture for biomarker studies. Geocoding was performed to quantify residential proximity to major roadways and pollutant exposure.
RESULTS: A total of 447 children with uncontrolled asthma were enrolled. Children living closer to highly trafficked roadways were more disadvantaged and had more exposure to diesel PM, more exacerbations prompting an emergency department visit, and lower lung function measures. Children with the highest diesel PM exposure, compared with children with the lowest diesel PM exposure, also had blunted cytokine secretion and evidence of T-cell exhaustion, including disturbances in several metabolites associated with glutathione formation and oxidative stress.
CONCLUSIONS: Traffic-related diesel PM exposure in children with poorly controlled asthma is associated with poorer clinical outcomes and unique patterns of inflammation and oxidative stress. These findings argue for continued mitigation efforts to improve traffic-related air quality and health equity in children with asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the characteristics of adult patients admitted for asthma exacerbation and determine optimization, treatment adherence, and follow-up in clinics.
METHODS: Patients ≥ 18 years old admitted from May 2021 to June 2023 with a primary diagnosis of asthma exacerbation were included. Patients with a secondary diagnosis of asthma exacerbation and those without a confirmed diagnosis were excluded.
RESULTS: A total of 186 patients were analyzed, 63% were female, with a mean age of 49 ± 34 years, mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.4 ± 5 kg/m2, mean immunoglobulin E level of 132 ± 235 IU/mL (range: 25-2041), mean eosinophils count of 180 ± 443, and length of stay of 8.6 ± 5 days. Comparing patients with one admission to those with multiple admissions, differences were observed in age (39 ± 15 vs. 58 ± 20, p < 0.0001), BMI (25.2 ± 3 vs. 27.4 ± 4, p < 0.0003), comorbidity (15% vs. 60%, p < 0.0001), and length of stay (4.5 ± 2 vs. 11 ± 3, p < 0.0001). Of the patients, 15% had undiagnosed asthma, 28% had known asthma without maintenance therapy, 23% were managed by primary care, and 34% were followed by pneumology. The mean Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) score was 42.5 ± 8 points, with 70% showing erratic non-adherence, 46% showing deliberate non-adherence, and 21% showing unconscious non-adherence.
CONCLUSIONS: The young population represents a significant percentage of admissions for asthma exacerbation due to poor follow-up in pulmonology clinics, inadequate treatment optimization, and low adherence. This study adds that it is necessary to improve the approach to asthma in primary care to optimize treatment, reduce under-diagnosis, and avoid hospital admissions.

Causes of asthma exacerbation in children have been studied extensively at the individual level, but contributions of neighborhood-level factors are less explored. We test which distinctive residential characteristics produce variation in uncontrolled asthma among pediatric patients. We extracted electronic medical record data from pediatric patients living in Southern California and used multilevel modeling techniques to isolate which neighborhood characteristics drive inequitable asthma control. Above and beyond the individual-level factors known to predict inadequate disease control, neighborhoods with greater concentration of non-Hispanic black residents (odds ratios [OR] = 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99-1.03; P < .05), higher proportions of female-headed households (OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.99-1.01; P < .05), and higher levels of ambient air pollution (OR = 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01-1.10; P < .001) associate with greater odds of asthma exacerbation. The interplay between community characteristics and asthma management during childhood is complex, and place-based initiatives are needed to narrow the gap in asthma exacerbation.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Asthma exacerbation (AE) is a significant clinical problem during pregnancy. This study aimed to identify maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with AE during pregnancy.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Peking University Third Hospital database from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2020. We compared the clinical characteristics and maternal, perinatal and offspring outcomes of asthma with and without exacerbations among women who delivered during this period. The primary outcome was hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the clinical characteristics of AE during pregnancy and the association between AE and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes.
RESULTS: The prevalence of asthma during pregnancy increased from 0.52% in 2013 to 0.98% in 2020. Of the 220 patients with asthma during pregnancy included in the study, 105 experienced AE during pregnancy: 62.9% (n = 66) had mild-to-moderate AE and 37.1% (n = 39) had severe AE. Pregnant women with allergic rhinitis have a higher risk of AE during pregnancy. Women who experienced AE were more at risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy than women who did not experience any exacerbation (12.4%vs3.5%, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of asthma among pregnant women in China is on the rise. There is a notable correlation between pregnant women who suffer from allergic rhinitis and an elevated risk of AE during pregnancy. Studies have shown that AE during pregnancy are associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) are empirically used to treat asthma symptoms such as cough; however, the effectiveness of PPI on asthma exacerbation has not been well studied. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between PPI use and asthma exacerbation using a large administrative claims database in Japan. We conducted a self-controlled case series using the JMDC Claims Database (JMDC, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The cases included adult patients with asthma who were prescribed PPI and experienced at least one outcome event between January 2015 and December 2019. The primary outcome was the composite outcome of hospital admissions and unscheduled outpatient clinic visits due to asthma exacerbation. We also conducted stratified analyses based on PPI generation, the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), asthma severity, and the number of allergic comorbidities. A total of 7379 eligible patients were included in the study. PPI prescription was associated with a decrease in the composite outcomes (incidence rate ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.93). However, PPI prescriptions did not affect the outcomes of hospital admissions (incidence rate ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-2.10). Stratified analyses based on PPI generation, the presence of GERD, asthma severity (except for severe asthma), and the number of allergic comorbidities yielded consistent results. PPI use was associated with a moderate decrease in asthma exacerbation, regardless of the patient profile. However, this effect was not as strong as the prevention of hospital admissions, and outcome events were not prevented in patients with severe asthma.