Asthma exacerbation

哮喘加重
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管已经确定了一些与哮喘症状恶化和恶化风险相关的因素,这些尚未完全表征。我们进行了临床建模和模拟研究,以了解影响症状控制的基线因素,在定期给药吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)单药治疗随访期间,中重度哮喘患者使用缓解剂和恶化风险,或ICS/长效β2-激动剂(LABA)联合治疗。
    方法:使用来自随机临床试验(2001年至2019年进行)的个体患者数据来模拟症状的时程(n=7593),缓解药物使用模式(n=3768)和首次加重时间(n=6763),考虑到患者特异性和外在因素,包括治疗。模型验证使用标准图形和统计标准。症状控制评分的变化(哮喘控制问卷5[ACQ-5]),然后在具有不同基线特征和治疗设置的患者队列中模拟了缓解剂使用减少和年度加重率.
    结果:作为一个吸烟者,具有较高的基线ACQ-5和体重指数影响症状控制评分,使用缓解剂和恶化风险(p<0.01)。此外,低用力呼气量预测为1%,女性性别,发现季节和以前的恶化有助于进一步增加恶化风险(p<0.01),而长哮喘病史与更频繁使用缓解剂相关(p<0.01)。这些效果与基础维持治疗无关。在不同的场景中,与FF或丙酸氟替卡松(FP)或布地奈德/福莫特罗相比,糠酸氟替卡松(FF)/维兰特罗的缓解剂使用和恶化率降低幅度更大,独立于其他因素(p<0.01)。
    结论:这项研究进一步了解了个体基线特征对治疗反应的影响,并强调了ICS/LABA联合治疗在症状控制方面的显着差异,使用缓解剂和恶化风险。这些因素应纳入临床实践,作为对中重度哮喘患者进行量身定制管理的基础。
    在这项研究中,我们量化了治疗开始时个体基线患者特征如何影响对常规维持药物的反应。具体来说,使用计算机建模和模拟,基于纳入中重度哮喘临床试验的个体患者的数据,我们预测了他们需要多少缓解吸入器,他们对哮喘控制的评价有多好,以及在接下来的12个月内发生哮喘发作(恶化)的可能性。然后实施模拟方案以评估在临床实践中改善和个性化患者的现实生活管理的机会。考虑到症状控制水平,治疗开始时使用缓解剂和其他患者特定因素,我们评估了吸入性糖皮质激素/支气管扩张剂维持治疗在改善症状和/或降低哮喘发作风险方面的作用.这些情况表明,目前的吸烟者,哮喘症状评分较高的人,肥胖的人,并且有更长的哮喘病史倾向于更频繁地使用他们的缓解吸入器。此外,这与哮喘发作的风险较高和症状控制较差有关.在大多数情况下,这种模式似乎可以补偿相同基线因素对症状控制的影响。转用吸入性皮质类固醇对初始治疗反应不佳的患者,丙酸氟替卡松,与糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗相比,缓解吸入器的使用和哮喘发作的风险显著降低,与那些改用布地奈德/福莫特罗相比。这些发现强调了定制选择对中重度哮喘患者的最佳管理的重要性。
    BACKGROUND: Although some factors associated with asthma symptom deterioration and risk of exacerbation have been identified, these are not yet fully characterised. We conducted a clinical modelling and simulation study to understand baseline factors affecting symptom control, reliever use and exacerbation risk in patients with moderate-severe asthma during follow-up on regularly dosed inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) monotherapy, or ICS/long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) combination therapy.
    METHODS: Individual patient data from randomised clinical trials (undertaken between 2001 and 2019) were used to model the time course of symptoms (n = 7593), patterns of reliever medication use (n = 3768) and time-to-first exacerbation (n = 6763), considering patient-specific and extrinsic factors, including treatment. Model validation used standard graphical and statistical criteria. Change in symptom control scores (Asthma Control Questionnaire 5 [ACQ-5]), reduction in reliever use and annualised exacerbation rate were then simulated in patient cohorts with different baseline characteristics and treatment settings.
    RESULTS: Being a smoker, having higher baseline ACQ-5 and body mass index affected symptom control scores, reliever use and exacerbation risk (p < 0.01). In addition, low forced expiratory volume in 1 s percent predicted, female sex, season and previous exacerbations were found to contribute to a further increase in exacerbation risk (p < 0.01), whereas long asthma history was associated with more frequent reliever use (p < 0.01). These effects were independent from the underlying maintenance therapy. In different scenarios, fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol was associated with greater reductions in reliever use and exacerbation rates compared with FF or fluticasone propionate (FP) alone or budesonide/formoterol, independently from other factors (p < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provided further insight into the effects of individual baseline characteristics on treatment response and highlighted significant differences in the performance of ICS/LABA combination therapy on symptom control, reliever use and exacerbation risk. These factors should be incorporated into clinical practice as the basis for tailored management of patients with moderate-severe asthma.
    In this study we quantified how individual baseline patient characteristics at the start of treatment influence the response to regular maintenance medication. Specifically, using computer modelling and simulations based on data from individual patients enrolled into clinical trials in moderate–severe asthma, we predicted how much reliever inhaler they need, how well they rate their asthma control, and how likely an asthma attack (exacerbation) is to occur within the next 12 months. Simulation scenarios were then implemented to evaluate opportunities to improve and personalise real-life management of patients in clinical practice. Considering symptom control level, reliever use and other patient-specific factors at the start of treatment, we assessed how well maintenance therapy with inhaled corticosteroids/bronchodilators contributes to symptom improvement and/or reduction in the risk of asthma attacks. These scenarios show that current smokers, people with higher asthma symptom scores, who are obese, and have a longer history of asthma tend to use their reliever inhalers more often. Moreover, this was linked to a higher risk of having an asthma attack and worse symptom control. This pattern appears to compensate in most cases for the effect of the same baseline factors on symptom control. Switching patients who are not responding well to initial treatment with the inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate, to fluticasone furoate/vilanterol resulted in a significantly greater reduction in reliever inhaler use and risk of asthma attack, compared with those switched to budesonide/formoterol. These findings highlight the importance of tailored choices for optimal management of patients with moderate–severe asthma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在过去的十年中,美国成年人的雪茄使用保持相对稳定,并且随着香烟使用的减少,在烟草市场中占据了越来越多的部分。虽然研究已经确定了吸烟对呼吸健康的有害影响,雪茄的使用效果需要进一步表征。在这项研究中,我们评估了雪茄使用之间的前瞻性关联,不管有没有香烟,和哮喘恶化。
    方法:我们使用来自烟草与健康研究人口评估的Waves1-5(2013-2019)的数据来运行广义估计方程模型,检查时变,美国成年人中单波滞后的香烟和雪茄使用和自我报告的哮喘加重(18+)。我们将我们的暴露定义为非既定(参考),前者,独家香烟,独家雪茄,双重使用。我们将哮喘加重事件定义为过去12个月内报告的哮喘发作,需要口服或注射类固醇药物或哮喘症状,在过去30天内每周至少一次干扰睡眠。我们调整了年龄,性别,种族和民族,家庭收入,健康保险,已建立的电子尼古丁输送系统使用,香烟包装年,二手烟暴露,肥胖,和基线哮喘恶化。
    结果:独家使用香烟(发生率比(IRR):1.26,95%置信区间(CI):1.03-1.54)和双重使用(IRR:1.41,95%CI:1.08-1.85)与未确定的使用相比,哮喘加重率更高。而以前的使用(IRR:1.01,95%CI:0.80-1.28)和独家雪茄使用(IRR:0.70,95%CI:0.42-1.17)则没有。
    结论:我们发现独家使用雪茄与自我报告的哮喘恶化之间没有关联。然而,与未确定的使用相比,独家使用香烟和双重使用香烟和雪茄与自我报告的哮喘加重发生率较高相关.研究应评估策略,以改善继续吸烟的哮喘成年人的香烟和雪茄戒烟。
    BACKGROUND: Cigar use among adults in the United States has remained relatively stable in the past decade and occupies a growing part of the tobacco marketplace as cigarette use has declined. While studies have established the detrimental respiratory health effects of cigarette use, the effects of cigar use need further characterization. In this study, we evaluate the prospective association between cigar use, with or without cigarettes, and asthma exacerbation.
    METHODS: We used data from Waves 1-5 (2013-2019) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study to run generalized estimating equation models examining the association between time-varying, one-wave-lagged cigarette and cigar use and self-reported asthma exacerbation among US adults (18+). We defined our exposure as non-established (reference), former, exclusive cigarette, exclusive cigar, and dual use. We defined an asthma exacerbation event as a reported asthma attack in the past 12 months necessitating oral or injected steroid medication or asthma symptoms disrupting sleep at least once a week in the past 30 days. We adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, household income, health insurance, established electronic nicotine delivery systems use, cigarette pack-years, secondhand smoke exposure, obesity, and baseline asthma exacerbation.
    RESULTS: Exclusive cigarette use (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.54) and dual use (IRR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.08-1.85) were associated with a higher rate of asthma exacerbation compared to non-established use, while former use (IRR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.80-1.28) and exclusive cigar use (IRR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.42-1.17) were not.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found no association between exclusive cigar use and self-reported asthma exacerbation. However, exclusive cigarette use and dual cigarette and cigar use were associated with higher incidence rates of self-reported asthma exacerbation compared to non-established use. Studies should evaluate strategies to improve cigarette and cigar smoking cessation among adults with asthma who continue to smoke.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:哮喘恶化(AE)是怀孕期间的重要临床问题。本研究旨在确定妊娠期间与AE相关的母体和围产期结局。
    方法:我们于2013年1月1日至2020年12月31日使用北京大学第三医院数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们比较了临床特征和产妇,在这一时期分娩的妇女中,有或没有哮喘加重的围产期和后代结局。主要结果是妊娠高血压疾病(HDP)。采用单变量和多变量logistic回归分析妊娠期AE的临床特征以及AE与不良母婴及围产期结局的关系。
    结果:妊娠期哮喘的患病率从2013年的0.52%上升到2020年的0.98%。在纳入研究的220名妊娠期哮喘患者中,105例妊娠期间发生AE:62.9%(n=66)有轻度至中度AE,37.1%(n=39)有重度AE。患有过敏性鼻炎的孕妇在怀孕期间发生AE的风险更高。经历AE的女性比没有经历任何恶化的女性更容易患妊娠期高血压疾病(12.4%vs3.5%,p<0.05)。
    结论:中国孕妇的哮喘患病率呈上升趋势。患有过敏性鼻炎的孕妇与怀孕期间AE风险升高之间存在显著相关性。研究表明,妊娠期间的AE与妊娠高血压疾病的风险增加有关。
    BACKGROUND: Asthma exacerbation (AE) is a significant clinical problem during pregnancy. This study aimed to identify maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with AE during pregnancy.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Peking University Third Hospital database from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2020. We compared the clinical characteristics and maternal, perinatal and offspring outcomes of asthma with and without exacerbations among women who delivered during this period. The primary outcome was hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the clinical characteristics of AE during pregnancy and the association between AE and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes.
    RESULTS: The prevalence of asthma during pregnancy increased from 0.52% in 2013 to 0.98% in 2020. Of the 220 patients with asthma during pregnancy included in the study, 105 experienced AE during pregnancy: 62.9% (n = 66) had mild-to-moderate AE and 37.1% (n = 39) had severe AE. Pregnant women with allergic rhinitis have a higher risk of AE during pregnancy. Women who experienced AE were more at risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy than women who did not experience any exacerbation (12.4%vs3.5%, p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of asthma among pregnant women in China is on the rise. There is a notable correlation between pregnant women who suffer from allergic rhinitis and an elevated risk of AE during pregnancy. Studies have shown that AE during pregnancy are associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    质子泵抑制剂(PPI)用于治疗哮喘症状,如咳嗽;然而,PPI对哮喘加重的有效性尚未得到很好的研究.我们旨在使用日本的大型行政索赔数据库评估PPI使用与哮喘恶化之间的关系。我们使用JMDC索赔数据库(JMDC,Inc.,东京,日本)。这些病例包括成人哮喘患者,他们在2015年1月至2019年12月期间服用PPI并经历至少一次结局事件。主要结局是因哮喘加重而入院和计划外门诊就诊的复合结局。我们还根据PPI的产生进行了分层分析,胃食管反流病(GERD)的存在,哮喘严重程度,以及过敏性合并症的数量。总共7379名符合条件的患者被纳入研究。PPI处方与综合结局的下降相关(发生率比,0.90;95%置信区间,0.87-0.93)。然而,PPI处方不影响住院患者的结果(发病率比,1.34;95%置信区间,0.86-2.10)。基于PPI生成的分层分析,GERD的存在,哮喘严重程度(严重哮喘除外),和过敏性合并症的数量产生一致的结果。PPI使用与哮喘加重的中度减少有关,不管病人的情况如何。然而,这种效果不如预防住院那么强,重度哮喘患者的结局事件未得到预防.
    Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) are empirically used to treat asthma symptoms such as cough; however, the effectiveness of PPI on asthma exacerbation has not been well studied. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between PPI use and asthma exacerbation using a large administrative claims database in Japan. We conducted a self-controlled case series using the JMDC Claims Database (JMDC, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The cases included adult patients with asthma who were prescribed PPI and experienced at least one outcome event between January 2015 and December 2019. The primary outcome was the composite outcome of hospital admissions and unscheduled outpatient clinic visits due to asthma exacerbation. We also conducted stratified analyses based on PPI generation, the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), asthma severity, and the number of allergic comorbidities. A total of 7379 eligible patients were included in the study. PPI prescription was associated with a decrease in the composite outcomes (incidence rate ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.93). However, PPI prescriptions did not affect the outcomes of hospital admissions (incidence rate ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-2.10). Stratified analyses based on PPI generation, the presence of GERD, asthma severity (except for severe asthma), and the number of allergic comorbidities yielded consistent results. PPI use was associated with a moderate decrease in asthma exacerbation, regardless of the patient profile. However, this effect was not as strong as the prevention of hospital admissions, and outcome events were not prevented in patients with severe asthma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    病毒是秋季和冬季哮喘恶化最常见的触发因素。病毒,比如甲型流感和鼻病毒,在哮喘严重加重的发生中起主要作用。病毒感染和儿童哮喘恶化之间的这种关联是免疫系统的抗病毒反应和各种抗炎现象的结果。在这项工作中,我们旨在确定儿童哮喘急性发作的病毒学特征,并分析病毒感染类型与急性发作严重程度之间的相关性.材料与方法本回顾性研究于2016年1月至2024年1月进行。该研究包括因哮喘发作与病毒样呼吸道感染体征相关而住院的儿童,通过多重实时聚合酶链反应进行病毒学检测阳性,或在甲型流感或呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)的情况下进行快速检测。使用MicrosoftExcel和SPSS软件使用先前建立的数据收集表进行数据分析。结果在研究期间收集了30例病例。患者的平均年龄为4岁零8个月,男女比例为3.3。已知有18名患者患有哮喘,其中九人哮喘失控,12名患者首次出现恶化。在14例患者中发现了病毒脱落。在所有患者中都发现了一种病毒,三名患者同时感染两种或两种以上病毒。发现的病毒是甲型流感(18例),鼻病毒/肠道病毒(8例),RSV(8例)人类偏肺病毒(三名患者),和副流感IV型仅在一名就职患者中。20例患者哮喘加重严重,八名患者中度,两名患者患有严重的急性哮喘,需要重症监护管理。我们注意到,在甲型流感病毒感染患者中,严重恶化的频率更高。所有RSV感染患者均表现为中度加重。没有发现哮喘严重程度与其他类型病毒之间的其他显着相关性。结论我们的研究结果证明了病毒在引发哮喘急性发作中所起的主要作用。主要是流感病毒,其次是肠道病毒,鼻病毒,RSV,和偏肺病毒。应进行更大规模的研究,以建立更完整的病毒学概况,并进一步研究儿童哮喘管理中的病毒因子。
    Introduction Viruses are the most common triggering factors for asthma exacerbation during the autumn and winter seasons. Viruses, such as influenza A and rhinovirus, play a major role in the occurrence of severe exacerbation of asthma. This association between viral infection and asthma exacerbation in children is a result of the antiviral response of the immune system and various anti-inflammatory phenomena. In this work, we aimed to identify the virological profile of asthma exacerbation in children and analyze the correlation between viral infection type and the severity of exacerbation. Materials and methods This retrospective study was conducted from January 2016 to January 2024. The study included children hospitalized for asthma exacerbation associated with signs of viral-like respiratory infection with positive virological testing by multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction or rapid test in the case of influenza A or respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Data analysis was performed with Microsoft Excel and SPSS software using a previously established data collection sheet Results Thirty cases were collected for the study period. The mean age of the patients was 4 years and 8 months, with a male-to-female ratio of 3.3. Eighteen patients were known to have asthma, of which nine had uncontrolled asthma, and exacerbation was inaugural in 12 patients. Viral shedding was found in 14 patients. A viral agent was found in all patients, with coinfection of two or more viruses in three patients. The viruses found were influenza A (18 cases), coupled rhinovirus/enterovirus (eight cases), RSV (eight cases), human metapneumovirus (three patients), and parainfluenza type IV in only one inaugural patient. Asthma exacerbation was severe in 20 patients, moderate in eight patients, and two patients had severe acute asthma requiring intensive care management. We noted a higher frequency of severe exacerbation among those with an influenza A viral infection. All patients with RSV infection exhibited moderate exacerbation. No other significant correlation between asthma severity and other types of viruses was found. Conclusions Our results demonstrate the major role played by viruses in triggering asthma exacerbation, primarily influenza virus, followed by enterovirus, rhinovirus, RSV, and metapneumovirus. Larger-scale studies should be carried out to establish a more complete virological profile and further investigate the viral factor in the management of asthma in children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:哮喘是儿童中最常见的慢性呼吸系统疾病。哮喘恶化(AE)是急诊(ED)就诊的常见原因。治疗中度至重度AE的一个重要步骤是在ED出现后1小时内给予全身性皮质类固醇(SCS)。这项研究旨在确定SCS给药的时间,并将其与住院时间和氧气治疗持续时间相关联,并探索预测及时给药的因素。
    方法:本研究采用基于电子病历回顾的回顾性多中心观察设计。18岁以下儿童,包括出现中度至重度AE的ED。
    结果:205例患者被纳入。只有28例患者在ED到达后60分钟内接受了SCS。SCS给药的中位时间为169分钟(Q192-Q3380)。发现时间和氧气治疗持续时间(r=0.363,p<0.001)与住院时间(r=0.368,p<0.001)之间存在相关性。没有患者特征预测SCS的及时给药。
    结论:在ED出现中度至重度AE的儿童中有四分之三在第一个小时内没有接受SCS。延长SCS给药时间与延长的住院时间和延长的氧气支持需求相关。
    BACKGROUND: Asthma is the most prevalent chronic respiratory condition in children. An asthma exacerbation (AE) is a frequent reason for emergency department (ED) visits. An important step in the management of a moderate to severe AE is the administration of systemic corticosteroids (SCS) within 1 h after ED presentation. This study aimed to determine the timing of SCS administration and correlate this with the length of stay and oxygen therapy duration and to explore factors predicting timely administration.
    METHODS: This study used a retrospective multicenter observational design based on electronic medical records review. Children aged < 18 years, presenting to the ED with a moderate to severe AE were included.
    RESULTS: 205 patients were included. Only 28 patients received SCS within 60 min after ED arrival. The median time to SCS administration was 169 min (Q1 92-Q3 380). A correlation was found between timing and oxygen treatment duration (r = 0.363, p < 0.001) and length of stay (r = 0.368, p < 0.001). No patient characteristics predicted timely SCS administration.
    CONCLUSIONS: Three in four children who presented with a moderate to severe AE at the ED did not receive SCS within the first hour. A prolonged timing of SCS administration correlated with a prolonged length of stay and extended need for oxygen support.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:哮喘是最常见的慢性呼吸道疾病之一,涉及炎症,在全球范围内具有很高的负担。这项研究旨在确定胸腺(TV)对5至12岁儿童轻度至中度哮喘加重的咳嗽的影响。
    方法:在本随机分组中,三盲临床试验,将60名年龄在5至12岁之间的哮喘发作儿童随机分为两组。干预组(n=30)每8小时以20mg/kg的剂量给予电视粉,制成糖浆,加上一周的常规医疗,对照组(n=30)仅接受安慰剂糖浆的常规药物治疗。在周末,临床和实验室症状,并重新记录两组的肺活量测定数据.最后,对记录的因素进行比较和统计学分析。
    结果:结果显示,干预后,活动引起的咳嗽减少,两组间差异有统计学意义(p=0.042),但是喘息和呼吸困难的减少没有统计学意义。肺活量测定数据显示两组干预后1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)有显著差异(p=0.048),但这种差异在FEV1/FVC(强迫肺活量)中并不显着,峰值呼气流量(PEF),和25-75%的肺活量(FEF25-75%)的强制呼气流量。
    结论:结果表明,电视糖浆可作为哮喘急性发作患儿的辅助治疗药物。
    BACKGROUND: Asthma is one of the most common chronic respiratory diseases with inflammatory involvement and has a high burden worldwide. This study aimed to determine the effect of Thymus vulgaris (TV) on cough in children between 5 and 12 years old with mild to moderate asthma exacerbation.
    METHODS: In this randomized, triple-blind clinical trial, 60 children between the ages of 5 and 12 with asthma exacerbations were randomly divided into two groups. The intervention group (n = 30) was given TV powder at a dose of 20 mg/kg every 8 hours, prepared as syrup, along with routine medical treatment for a week, and the control group (n = 30) received only routine medical treatment with placebo syrup. At the end of the week, clinical and laboratory symptoms, and spirometry data were re-recorded for both groups. Finally, the recorded factors were compared and statistically analyzed.
    RESULTS: The results showed that after the intervention, activity-induced cough reduced, and difference was statistically significant between the two groups (p = 0.042), but the reduction in wheezing and breathlessness had no statistically significant difference. Spirometry data showed a significant difference in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) between the two groups after intervention (p = 0.048), but this difference was not significant in FEV1/FVC (forced vital capacity), peak expiratory flow (PEF), and forced expiratory flow at 25-75% of the vital capacity (FEF25-75%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The results show that TV syrup may be useful as an adjuvant treatment in children with asthma exacerbations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:了解成都地区哮喘急性发作患儿的数量和特点,中国,在COVID-19大流行之前和之后,为在后流行时代管理儿童哮喘的努力提供信息。
    方法:回顾性收集2017年1月至2022年12月成都妇女儿童中心医院因哮喘加重入院的儿童的数据。住院率,受影响儿童的年龄,合并症和感染,在流行前后,检查了住院与季节或环境因素之间的关系。
    结果:因哮喘加重住院的儿童较少,然而,更多的住院儿童在流行后比以前严重恶化。住院率随时间变化很大,流行前后住院高峰的时间有所不同。只有在流行病之前,哮喘急性发作的住院率与湿度呈正相关.流行病后,婴儿占住院儿童的比例比以前小,流行后,学龄前儿童占大多数住院人数。因哮喘发作住院的儿童在流行后也患有肺炎的比例明显小于以前。相反,因哮喘加重而住院的儿童在流行后也患有过敏性疾病的比例明显高于以前.
    结论:儿童哮喘发作的流行病学在流行后发生了变化。未来在儿科人群中管理病情的努力应该集中在严重的哮喘发作上,过敏性疾病的预防和管理,以及气象和环境因素的影响。
    To examine the numbers and characteristics of children affected by asthma exacerbation in Chengdu, China, before and after the COVID-19 pandemic to inform efforts to manage childhood asthma in the post epidemic era.
    Data were retrospectively collected from children admitted for asthma exacerbation to Chengdu Women and Children\'s Central Hospital between January 2017 and December 2022. Rates of hospitalization, ages of the affected children, comorbidities and infections, and relationships between hospitalization and seasonal or environmental factors were examined before and after the epidemic.
    Fewer children were hospitalized for asthma exacerbation, yet more hospitalized children had severe exacerbation after the epidemic than before. Rates of hospitalization varied considerably with time of year, and the timing of peak hospitalizations differed before and after the epidemic. Only before the epidemic, rates of hospitalization for asthma exacerbation were positively correlated with humidity. Infants made up a smaller proportion of hospitalized children after the epidemic than before, with preschool children accounting for most hospitalizations after the epidemic. The proportion of children hospitalized for asthma exacerbation who also had pneumonia was significantly smaller after the epidemic than before. Conversely, the proportion of children hospitalized for asthma exacerbation who also had allergic diseases was significantly greater after the epidemic than before.
    The epidemiology of asthma exacerbation in children changed after the epidemic. Future efforts to manage the condition in the paediatric population should focus on severe asthma exacerbation, prevention and management of allergic diseases, and the influence of meteorological and environmental factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在成人中,高水平臭氧(O3)暴露与哮喘急性加重之间存在因果关系的证据有限,结论不太明确。
    在这里,我们收集了哮喘病例的每日数据,O3暴露,2010-2016年石家庄市气象因子,中国。我们使用多项式分布滞后模型(PDLM)调查了与高水平臭氧暴露相关的哮喘恶化风险。使用广义加法模型(GAM),我们估计了O3与其他污染物以及气象因素对哮喘恶化的交互作用。
    共有7270名哮喘患者来自13个县的22家政府医院。在第7天,O3浓度每增加10μg/m3,与哮喘发作的1.92%(95%CI=0.80-3.03%)的哮喘发作风险增加相关。在第14天,O3对哮喘加重的累积风险增加了18.9%(95%CI=12.8-25.4%)。高水平的O3会增加哮喘恶化的风险,O3和二氧化硫(SO2)的相互作用作用出现在恶化开始之前。
    这些研究结果表明,O3应该是哮喘加重的重要危险因素,通过持续努力改善中国的空气质量,将获得降低哮喘恶化风险的健康益处。
    UNASSIGNED: The evidence for a causal relationship between high-level ozone (O3) exposure and acute exacerbation of asthma among adults is limited, and the conclusions are less definitive.
    UNASSIGNED: Here we collected the daily data on asthma cases, O3 exposure, and meteorological factors from 2010 to 2016 in Shijiazhuang, China. We investigated the risk of asthma exacerbation associated with high-level ozone exposure using a polynomial distributed lag model (PDLM). Using a generalized additive model (GAM), we estimated the interactive effects between O3 and other pollutants as well as meteorological factors on asthma exacerbation.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 7270 patients with asthma were enrolled from 22 governmental hospitals in 13 counties. Each 10 μg/m3 increase in O3 concentration on the exacerbation of asthma was associated with a 1.92% (95% CI = 0.80-3.03%) higher risk of asthma exacerbation on day lag 7. The cumulative risk of O3 on asthma exacerbation increased by 18.9% (95% CI = 12.8-25.4%) on the 14th day. High consecutive levels of O3 increase the risk of asthma exacerbation, and the interactive effect of O3 and sulfur dioxide (SO2) appears before the exacerbation onset.
    UNASSIGNED: These findings suggested that O3 should be an important risk factor for asthma exacerbation, and health benefits in reducing asthma exacerbation risk would be gained with continued efforts to improve the air quality in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:建议制定治疗哮喘急性发作的书面行动计划(WAP)。
    目的:我们比较了通过智能手机Web应用程序(app)结合纸质WAP访问的数字行动计划(DAP)对计划外医疗联系人(UMC)的影响与单独使用相同WAP的影响。
    方法:这是随机的,未失明,多中心(医生在私人办公室和公立医院进行离线招聘),平行组试验纳入了儿童(6~12岁)或成人(18~60岁)的哮喘患者,这些患者在前一年至少经历过一次严重加重.他们以1:1的比例随机分配至WAP或DAP+WAP。DAP(全自动)根据恶化的严重程度和先前的药物治疗提供治疗建议。DAP是记录3到9个临床描述符的算法。使用该应用程序时,参与者首先以10分量表评估当前症状的严重程度,然后输入症状描述符.在试验(DAP开发)之前,这些描述符的措辞及其顺序已由50名哮喘儿童的父母和50名哮喘成人的父母进行验证;该应用程序在试验期间未进行修改。参与者在三点时接受了采访,六,九,和12个月来记录恶化,UMCs,以及WAP和DAP的使用,包括主观评价(可用性,有用性)的行动计划,一个研究护士。
    结果:二百八十名参与者被随机分组,其中33人由于随机分组后没有随访数据而被排除。留下247名参与者(93名儿童,154名成年人)。WAP组有123名参与者(45名儿童,平均年龄8.3±2.0岁;78名成年人,36.3±12.7岁)和DAP+WAP组124名参与者(48名儿童,9.0±1.9岁;76名成年人,34.5±11.3年)。总的来说,年重度加重率为0.53,两组参与者无差异.WAP组的平均UMC数量/年为0.31±0.62,DAP+WAP组为0.37±0.82(平均差,0.06;95%置信区间,-0.12至0.24,P=.82)。对于WAP,每位至少有一次中度或重度恶化的患者的使用量较高(对于DAP,33/65对15/63,P=.002)。因此,尽管两种行动计划的主观评价无显著差异,但与DAP相比,参与者更有可能使用WAP.参与者自我评估的恶化症状严重程度中位数为4/10,与应用评估的症状严重程度没有显着差异。
    结论:DAP的使用频率低于WAP,并且与单独使用WAP相比,没有减少UMC的数量。这并不质疑行动计划及其相关治疗教育的兴趣。远程医疗在哮喘护理中的益处仍有待证明。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02869958。
    A written action plan (WAP) for managing asthma exacerbations is recommended.
    We aimed to compare the effect on unscheduled medical contacts (UMCs) of a digital action plan (DAP) accessed via a smartphone web app combined with a WAP on paper versus that of the same WAP alone.
    This randomized, unblinded, multicenter (offline recruitment in private offices and public hospitals), and parallel-group trial included children (aged 6-12 years) or adults (aged 18-60 years) with asthma who had experienced at least 1 severe exacerbation in the previous year. They were randomized to a WAP or DAP+WAP group in a 1:1 ratio. The DAP (fully automated) provided treatment advice according to the severity and previous pharmacotherapy of the exacerbation. The DAP was an algorithm that recorded 3 to 9 clinical descriptors. In the app, the participant first assessed the severity of their current symptoms on a 10-point scale and then entered the symptom descriptors. Before the trial, the wordings and ordering of these descriptors were validated by 50 parents of children with asthma and 50 adults with asthma; the app was not modified during the trial. Participants were interviewed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to record exacerbations, UMCs, and WAP and DAP use, including the subjective evaluation (availability and usefulness) of the action plans, by a research nurse.
    Overall, 280 participants were randomized, of whom 33 (11.8%) were excluded because of the absence of follow-up data after randomization, leaving 247 (88.2%) participants (children: n=93, 37.7%; adults: n=154, 62.3%). The WAP group had 49.8% (123/247) of participants (children: n=45, 36.6%; mean age 8.3, SD 2.0 years; adults: n=78, 63.4%; mean age 36.3, SD 12.7 years), and the DAP+WAP group had 50.2% (124/247) of participants (children: n=48, 38.7%; mean age 9.0, SD 1.9 years; adults: n=76, 61.3%; mean age 34.5, SD 11.3 years). Overall, the annual severe exacerbation rate was 0.53 and not different between the 2 groups of participants. The mean number of UMCs per year was 0.31 (SD 0.62) in the WAP group and 0.37 (SD 0.82) in the DAP+WAP group (mean difference 0.06, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.24; P=.82). Use per patient with at least 1 moderate or severe exacerbation was higher for the WAP (33/65, 51% vs 15/63, 24% for the DAP; P=.002). Thus, participants were more likely to use the WAP than the DAP despite the nonsignificant difference between the action plans in the subjective evaluation. Median symptom severity of the self-evaluated exacerbation was 4 out of 10 and not significantly different from the symptom severity assessed by the app.
    The DAP was used less often than the WAP and did not decrease the number of UMCs compared with the WAP alone.
    ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02869958; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02869958.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号