Anti-VEGF

抗 VEGF
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:通过本研究,我们调查了糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者在现实环境中转用玻璃体腔注射法利玛单抗(IVF)后的短期临床结局.方法:我们对所有接受IVF治疗的DME患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者对先前的抗VEGF治疗反应不足。收集的数据包括基线患者人口统计学,病史,最佳矫正视力(BCVA),中央视网膜厚度(CRT)和中央视网膜体积(CRV)。我们分析了试管婴儿前后的功能和结构措施,比较Faricimab应答者和减少应答者之间的基线人口统计学和治疗因素,并评估随访BCVA和CRT的影响因素。结果:本研究包括16例患者的25只眼。切换到IVF后,平均BCVA没有显着改善,从基线时的59.4±13.4糖尿病视网膜病变早期治疗研究(ETDRS)字母变为随访时的61.4±12.8个ETDRS字母(p=0.26)。CRT从414.4±126.3µm显著降低至353.3±131.1µm(p<0.011),3mmCRV从2.8±0.5mm3下降到2.6±0.6mm3(p<0.012)。七名患者符合响应者标准,表现出至少5个ETDRS字母的改善和至少30µm的同时CRT减少。进一步的分析表明,基线时更高的BCVA(p<0.001)与IVF后更好的BCVA相关,而较高的基线CRT(p<0.003),较高的既往抗VEGF药物(p<0.034)和既往皮质类固醇注射(p<0.019)与随访时更高的CRT相关.结论:在最初的IVF注射系列之后,我们观察到解剖学措施的明显改善。没有观察到功能改善,虽然视力保持稳定。较高的基线BCVA与更好的IVF后BCVA相关,而较高的基线CRT,较多的既往抗VEGF药物和既往皮质类固醇注射与IVF后较高的CRT相关.
    Background: With this study, we investigate the short-term clinical outcomes of patients affected by diabetic macular edema (DME) after switching to intravitreal Faricimab (IVF) in a real-world setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients treated for DME with IVF who showed insufficient responses to prior anti-VEGF therapy. Data collected included baseline patient demographics, medical history, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and central retinal volume (CRV). We analyzed functional and structural measures before and after IVF, compared baseline demographics and treatment factors between Faricimab-responders and reduced-responders and assessed influencing factors of the follow-up BCVA and CRT. Results: This study included 25 eyes from 16 patients. After switching to IVF, the mean BCVA showed no significant improvement, changing from 59.4 ± 13.4 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at baseline to 61.4 ± 12.8 ETDRS letters at follow-up (p = 0.26). CRT significantly reduced from 414.4 ± 126.3 µm to 353.3 ± 131.1 µm (p < 0.011), and the 3 mm CRV significantly decreased from 2.8 ± 0.5 mm3 to 2.6 ± 0.6 mm3 (p < 0.012). Seven patients met the responder criteria, exhibiting an improvement of at least 5 ETDRS letters and a simultaneous CRT reduction of at least 30 µm. Further analysis showed that higher BCVA at baseline (p < 0.001) was associated with better BCVA following IVF, while higher baseline CRT (p < 0.003), a higher number of prior anti-VEGF agents (p < 0.034) and prior corticosteroid injections (p < 0.019) were associated with greater CRT at follow-up. Conclusions: Following the initial IVF injection series, we observed a clear improvement of anatomical measures. No functional improvement was observed, although visual acuity remained stable. Higher baseline BCVA was associated with better post-IVF BCVA, while higher baseline CRT, a greater number of prior anti-VEGF agents and prior corticosteroid injections were linked to higher CRT post-IVF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于意大利患者对湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性(wAMD)的治疗满意度的数据有限。在这项横断面的现实世界研究中,评估了意大利wAMD患者对抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGFs)治疗的满意度.
    这是非干预性的,涉及接受抗VEGF治疗的wAMD患者的横断面调查。该调查是通过电话通过虚拟助手进行的。使用新开发的诺华量身定制的治疗满意度问卷(NVSTTSQ)和经过验证的黄斑疾病治疗满意度问卷(MacTSQ)评估患者的治疗满意度。
    总的来说,在意大利的5个中心招募了154名可评估患者。患者的平均年龄(SD)为76.8岁(7.01)。NVSTTSQ评估的总体治疗满意度评分为40.50(7.11),信息域的均值为9.97(1.84),未满足需求域的均值为22.98(4.57)。患者对诊断沟通满意(4.99[1.30]),提供的有关治疗管理的信息(4.58[1.49],范围0-6),候诊室(4.40[1.43]),以及中心的就诊和注射管理(5.14[1.12]),中心黄斑病变的一般管理(5.22[1.01])。患者对疾病管理方面的独立性不满意(2.56[2.45]);他们希望获得有关疾病的更多信息(5.38[1.03]),并讨论已治疗患者的注射程序(4.02[1.94])。MacTSQ量表的总体治疗满意度得分为55.84(10.13)。
    患有wAMD的患者对意大利疾病的整体管理感到满意。然而,患者希望获得更多有关疾病预后和管理的信息.
    UNASSIGNED: Limited data is available on treatment satisfaction with the management of wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) among patients in Italy. In this cross-sectional real-world study, treatment satisfaction with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGFs) was assessed in patients with wAMD in Italy.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a non-interventional, cross-sectional survey involving patients with wAMD receiving anti-VEGFs. The survey was administered through a virtual assistant via phone. Patients\' treatment satisfaction was assessed using a newly developed Novartis Tailored Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (NVS TTSQ) and the validated Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MacTSQ).
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, 154 evaluable patients were enrolled in 5 centers across Italy. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 76.8 years (7.01). Overall treatment satisfaction score assessed by NVS TTSQ was 40.50 (7.11), with a mean of 9.97 (1.84) on the information domain and 22.98 (4.57) on the unmet need domain. Patients were satisfied with diagnosis communication (4.99 [1.30]), information provided on treatment administration (4.58 [1.49], range 0-6), the waiting room (4.40 [1.43]), and management of visits and injections at the center (5.14 [1.12]), general management of maculopathy at the center (5.22 [1.01]). Patients were not satisfied with their independence in terms of disease management (2.56 [2.45]); they would like additional information about the disease (5.38 [1.03]) and to discuss the injection procedures (4.02 [1.94]) with already-treated patients. The overall treatment satisfaction score on MacTSQ scale was 55.84 (10.13).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with wAMD are satisfied with the overall management of their disease in Italy. However, patients would like to have more information on prognosis and management of the disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的不同光学相干断层扫描(OCT)模式对玻璃体内注射治疗的反应。
    在这次回顾中,比较,多中心研究,以前未经治疗的DME患者,在3个月的负荷剂量后接受玻璃体内雷珠单抗(IVR)或阿柏西普(IVA)和/或类固醇治疗的人,并在MARMASIA研究组进行了12个月的随访。根据OCT特征,DME的形态模式分为四组:弥漫性/自发性水肿(第1组),囊样水肿(第2组),弥漫性/自发性水肿+视网膜下液(SRF)(第3组),囊样水肿+SRF(第4组)。比较了DME组之间在第3、6和12个月时的中央黄斑厚度(CMT)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的变化以及第12个月时的注射次数。
    299例患者的455只眼纳入研究。第1、2、3和4组的平均基线BCVA[最小分辨角对数(logMAR)]分别为0.54±0.24、0.52±0.25、0.55±0.23和0.57±0.27。两组之间的基线平均BCVA之间没有显着差异(p=.35)。第1组的平均BCVA显着改善为0,47±0,33,第2组的0,42±0,33,第3组的0,47±0,31,第12个月的0,45±0,43。在第12个月时,两组之间的BCVA变化没有显着差异(p=0.71)。第1、2、3和4组的平均基线CMT分别为387、19±128、19、447、02±132、39、449、12±109、24和544、19±178、61。在基线,第4组的平均CMT显著高于其他组(p=.000).在第12个月,四组的平均CMT分别显着降低至325,16±97,55,334,94±115,99,324,33±79,20和332,08±150,40(p>.05)。两组在第12个月时的平均CMT没有显着差异(p=.835)。在第12个月时,第4组的CMT变化显着高于其他组(p=.000)。第12个月时玻璃体内注射抗VEGF的平均次数在第1组中为4.51±1.57,在第2组中为4.63±1.54,在第3组中为4.88±1.38,在第4组中为5.07±1.49。组1和组2中抗VEGF注射的平均次数显著低于组4(p=0.014和p=0.017)。
    在现实生活中,在12个月时,DME组之间在视觉改善方面没有显著差异.然而,第4组的解剖学改善优于其他DME组.
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the responses of different optical coherence tomography (OCT) patterns of diabetic macular edema (DME) to intravitreal injection therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective, comparative, and multicenter study, patients who had previously untreated DME, who received intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) or aflibercept (IVA) and/or steroid treatment with the pro re nata (PRN) treatment regimen after a 3-month loading dose, and had a 12-month follow-up in the MARMASIA Study Group were included. Morphological patterns of DME were divided into four groups based on OCT features diffuse/spongious edema (Group 1), cystoid edema (Group 2), diffuse/spongious edema+subretinal fluid (SRF) (Group 3), and cystoid edema+SRF (Group 4). Changes in central macular thickness (CMT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at months 3, 6, and 12, and the number of injections at month 12 were compared between the DME groups.
    UNASSIGNED: 455 eyes of 299 patients were included in the study. The mean baseline BCVAs [Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR)] in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 0.54 ± 0.24, 0.52 ± 0.25, 0.55 ± 0.23, and 0.57 ± 0.27, respectively. There was no significant difference between the baseline mean BCVAs between the groups (p = .35). The mean BCVAs were significantly improved to 0,47 ± 0,33 in group 1, 0,42 ± 0,33 in group 2, 0,47 ± 0,31 in group 3, and 0,45 ± 0,43 at month 12. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of BCVA change at month 12 (p = .71). The mean baseline CMTs in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 387,19 ± 128,19, 447,02 ± 132,39, 449,12 ± 109,24, and 544,19 ± 178,61, respectively. At baseline, the mean CMT was significantly higher in Group 4 than in the other groups (p = .000). The mean CMTs were significantly decreased to 325,16 ± 97,55, 334,94 ± 115,99, 324,33 ± 79,20, and 332,08 ± 150,40 in four groups at month 12 respectively (p > .05). The groups had no significant difference in mean CMT at month 12 (p = .835). The change in CMT was significantly higher in Group 4 than in the other groups at month 12 (p = .000). The mean number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections at month 12 was 4.51 ± 1.57 in Group 1, 4.63 ± 1.54 in Group 2, 4.88 ± 1.38 in Group 3, and 5.07 ± 1.49 in Group 4. The mean number of anti-VEGF injections in Group 1 and Group 2 was significantly lower than in Group 4 (p = 0,014 and p = 0,017).
    UNASSIGNED: In real life, there was no significant difference between the DME groups in terms of visual improvement at month 12. However, better anatomical improvement was achieved in Group 4 than in the other DME groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)是一种严重的视力威胁并发症,可发生在糖尿病性视网膜病变的任何阶段。主要治疗涉及抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)药物,它们非常有效,但伴随着挑战,例如需要频繁注射,复发,和对治疗的抵抗力。因此,人们对开发在DME中提供相似或更好结局的新疗法越来越感兴趣.这篇综述文章探讨了新兴的治疗方法,包括WNT激动剂,基因治疗,蛋白质抑制剂,and,最重要的是,有史以来第一个非侵入性和口服药物。糖尿病性视网膜病变的不断发展的疗法为与全球最常见的慢性疾病之一相关的视力丧失提供了希望。
    Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a serious vision-threatening complication that can arise at any stage of diabetic retinopathy. Primary treatment involves anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, which are highly effective but associated with challenges, such as the need for frequent injections, relapses, and resistance to therapy. Therefore, there has been a growing interest in developing new treatments that offer similar or superior outcomes in DME. This review article explores emerging treatments, including WNT agonists, gene therapy, protein inhibitors, and, most importantly, the first-ever non-invasive and oral drugs. The evolving therapies in diabetic retinopathy offer hope for continued improvement in vision loss associated with one of the most common chronic conditions worldwide.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着人类越来越容易接触和扩展太空飞行,在这些具有挑战性的环境中,考虑治疗各种眼病变得越来越重要。本文探讨了星际旅行的日益魅力及其对不同环境中健康管理的影响。它专门讨论了眼部疾病的药理学管理,重点介绍两种主要的给药方法:局部滴眼液和玻璃体内注射。本文探讨了微重力如何影响这些治疗方法的管理,理解太空中药物输送的一个重要方面。对眼部药物的药代动力学进行了广泛的分析,在零重力下检查药物和眼组织之间的相互作用。本文的目标是弥合对流体动力学的理解,微重力和人体生理系统为微重力中个人面临的创新解决方案铺平道路。
    As spaceflight becomes increasingly accessible and expansive to humanity, it is becoming ever more essential to consider the treatment of various eye diseases in these challenging environments. This paper delves into the increasing fascination with interplanetary travel and its implications for health management in varying environments. It specifically discusses the pharmacological management of ocular diseases, focusing on two key delivery methods: topical eye drops and intravitreal injections. The paper explores how microgravity impacts the administration of these treatments, a vital aspect in understanding drug delivery in space. An extensive analysis is presented on the pharmacokinetics of eye medications, examining the interaction between pharmaceuticals and ocular tissues in zero gravity. The goal of the paper is to bridge the understanding of fluid dynamics, microgravity and the human physiological systems to pave the way for innovative solutions faced by individuals in microgravity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)是全球范围内不可逆失明的主要原因,也是严重的医学和社会问题。患者数量的稳步增加与人口老龄化有关。到目前为止,已经确定了许多影响AMD发展的因素,可以分为不可修改的,包括遗传因素,年龄,和性,和可改变的或环境因素,比如吸烟,不良饮食,和高血压。年龄相关性黄斑变性的早期阶段的特征是眼底玻璃疣和视网膜色素上皮异常。在后期阶段,观察到地理萎缩和脉络膜新生血管(CNV)。AMD的治疗,尤其是它的先进形式,非常具有挑战性。深入研究使pegcetacoplan和avacincaptadpegol治疗干性AMD的晚期成为可能,美国批准使用的新药。Pegcetacoplan靶向C3,avacincaptadpegol靶向C5,补体级联的关键蛋白。药物通过玻璃体内注射施用。新生血管性AMD(nAMD)的金标准包括玻璃体内注射抗血管内皮生长因子(抗VEGF)药物,如贝伐单抗,雷珠单抗,aflibercept,brolucizumab,和法利玛。治疗可按固定的方式进行,支持纳塔,治疗和扩展方案。后者似乎对改善视敏度(VA)和最大的治疗益处具有最佳效果。继续寻找递送玻璃体内药物的最佳方式。目前的方法包括缓释植入物和用于药物释放的水凝胶平台,而治疗干性和nAMD最有希望的未来途径是干细胞和基因治疗。
    Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide and a severe medical and social problem. The steadily increasing number of patients is related to the aging of the population. So far, many factors affecting the development of AMD have been identified, which can be divided into non-modifiable, including genetic factors, age, and sex, and modifiable or environmental factors, such as smoking, poor diet, and hypertension. Early stages of age-related macular degeneration are characterized by fundus drusen and abnormalities in the retinal pigment epithelium. In late stages, geographic atrophy and choroidal neovascularization (CNV) are observed. The treatment of AMD, especially its advanced forms, is very challenging. Intensive research has made it possible to treat advanced stages of the dry form of AMD with pegcetacoplan and avacincaptad pegol, new drugs approved for use in the US. Pegcetacoplan targets the C3 and avacincaptad pegol targets the C5, the pivotal proteins of the complement cascade. The drugs are administered by intravitreal injection. The gold standard for neovascular AMD (nAMD) consists of intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs such as bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, brolucizumab, and faricimab. Treatment can be administered according to the fixed, pro-re-nata, and treat-and-extend regimens. The latter seems to have the best effect on improving visual acuity (VA) and the maximum therapeutic benefit. The search continues for the best ways to deliver intravitreal drugs. Current methods include sustained-release implants and hydrogel platforms for drug release, while the most promising future pathways for treating dry and nAMD are stem cell and gene therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在HAWK和HARRIER研究中比较布罗珠单抗和阿柏西普治疗降低新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)患者色素上皮脱离(PED)和视网膜下色素上皮(sub-RPE)液最大厚度的疗效。
    方法:HAWK和HARRIER分别为96周,prospective,随机化,双面蒙面,控制,多中心研究对象,参与者,和/或对照:11个国家的1,775名患者被纳入HAWK研究,29个国家的1,048名患者被纳入HARRIER研究。
    三个月负荷剂量后,brolucizumab治疗的眼睛接受注射每12周(q12w)或q8w如果检测到疾病活动(DA).阿柏西普治疗的眼睛接受固定q8w给药。
    方法:在基线至第96周时,在接受brolucizumab和阿柏西普治疗的患者中,评估了PED和亚RPE流体在黄斑上的最大厚度,以及在第16周使用DA的患者亚组(在注射次数和治疗间隔方面匹配)。
    结果:在第96周,与接受阿柏西普治疗的患者相比,接受Brolucizumab治疗的患者的PED和sub-RPE液的最大厚度相对于基线的平均百分比降低更大(PED:HAWK中为19.7%[n=336]vs11.9%[n=335];HARRIER中为29.5%[n=364]vs18.3%[Sub-RPE流体:HAWK中75.4%对57.3%;HARRIER中86.0%对76.3%)。在第16周时在患有DA的患者中观察到平均百分比降低的类似趋势。
    结论:该分析表明,在HAWK和HARRIER中,与阿柏西普相比,Brolucizumab在PED和sub-RPE流体厚度方面实现了更大的降低。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of brolucizumab and aflibercept treatment in reducing maximum thickness of pigment epithelial detachments (PED) and sub-retinal pigment epithelium (sub-RPE) fluid in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in the HAWK and HARRIER studies.
    METHODS: HAWK and HARRIER were 96-week, prospective, randomized, double-masked, controlled, multicenter studies SUBJECTS, PARTICIPANTS, AND/OR CONTROLS: 1,775 patients across 11 countries were included in the HAWK study and 1,048 patients across 29 countries were included in the HARRIER study.
    UNASSIGNED: After three monthly loading doses, brolucizumab-treated eyes received injections every 12 weeks (q12w) or q8w if disease activity (DA) was detected. Aflibercept-treated eyes received fixed q8w dosing.
    METHODS: Maximum thickness of PED and sub-RPE fluid across the macula were assessed at baseline through Week 96 in the brolucizumab- and aflibercept-treated patients, and in the patient subgroups with DA at Week 16 (matched in terms of injection number and treatment interval).
    RESULTS: At Week 96, there were greater mean percentage reductions from baseline in maximum thickness of both PED and sub-RPE fluid in brolucizumab-treated patients versus aflibercept-treated patients (PED: 19.7% [n=336] vs 11.9% [n=335] in HAWK; 29.5% [n=364] vs 18.3% [n=361] in HARRIER. Sub-RPE fluid: 75.4% vs 57.3% in HAWK; 86.0% vs 76.3% in HARRIER). A similar trend in mean percentage reductions was observed in patients with DA at Week 16.
    CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that brolucizumab achieved greater reductions in PED and sub-RPE fluid thickness than aflibercept in HAWK and HARRIER.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在检查和比较糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者在中心凹下1500微米(μm)和黄斑下6000μm的玻璃体内贝伐单抗注射(IVB)的效果。
    45例DME患者的50只眼完成了6个剂量的IVB被纳入研究组,42例糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)但未接受任何治疗的患者的50只眼纳入对照组.中央黄斑厚度(CMT),中央脉络膜厚度(CCT),中央凹和脉络膜总面积(TCA),计算脉络膜血管指数(CVI),并计算它们在零时的变化,评估了3个月和6个月。
    在基线时,研究组中央凹下和黄斑区的CVI均显着降低(p=0.004,p=0.003)。在研究小组中,在0~6个月时,CVI在中心凹下区域显著下降(p=0.001).在黄斑下区域,研究组的CVI在0~3个月和0~6个月之间显著下降.黄斑中心凹下和总黄斑区的CVI测量值之间存在中度相关性(r=0.66,p<0.001)。
    这些发现表明,玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗可降低CVI,并且玻璃体内抗VEGF对CVI的影响在黄斑下6000µm区域出现得更早,更明显。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to examine and compare the effects of intravitreal bevacizumab injection (IVB) at subfoveal 1500 micron (μm) and submacular 6000 μm in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty eyes of 45 patients with DME who completed six doses of IVB were included in the study group, and 50 eyes of 42 patients who had diabetic retinopathy (DR) but did not receive any treatment were included in the control group. Central macular thickness (CMT), central choroidal thickness (CCT), subfoveal and total choroidal area (TCA), and choroidal vascular index (CVI) were calculated and their changes at zero, three and six months were evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: At baseline, CVI was significantly lower in both the subfoveal and total macular areas in the study group (p = 0.004, p = 0.003). In the study group, a significant decrease was observed in CVI between zero and six months in the subfoveal area (p = 0.001). In the submacular area, the decrease in CVI in the study group was significant between zero to three months and zero to six months. There was moderate correlation between measurements of CVI in the subfoveal and total macular areas (r = 0.66, p < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: These findings indicate that intravitreal bevacizumab injection reduces the CVI and the effects of intravitreal anti-VEGF on CVI emerge earlier and more prominently in the submacular 6000 µm area.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:量化COVID-19对我们人群nAMD患者的视觉结果和新生血管病变活动的长期影响(24个月)。
    方法:对在分娩前3个月内参加会诊或接受治疗的nAMD患者进行回顾性观察研究。
    结果:纳入144例nAMD患者(168只眼),其中51人(35.42%)是在监禁期间出生的,24个月时,最终队列为118例患者(133只眼).前57.99±23.68个字母的VA下降,临床相关和统计学显著,在12个月和24个月的随访中,平均为6.87(±16.84)和7.89(±19.58)。这种变化与国家预处理患者数据库中观察到的两年视力变化显着不同。12个月时,我们组的中位注射和咨询次数较低,与大流行前的国家数据库相比,并在24个月时趋于相等。当我们比较在分娩期间或治疗间隔大于8周(Tq8w)参加会诊的患者时,我们没有发现视力差异。
    结论:非AMD患者的VA在禁闭后显著下降,可能是由于第一年抗血管生成注射和咨询的次数较少,尽管注射次数和就诊次数增加接近分娩前报告的次数,但第二年没有恢复。
    OBJECTIVE: To quantify the long-term impact (24 months) on the visual results and activity of neovascular lesions of COVID-19 confinement in patients with nAMD in our population.
    METHODS: A retrospective observational study of patients with nAMD who attended consultation or were treated during the 3 months before confinement was carried out.
    RESULTS: 144 patients (168 eyes) with nAMD were included, 51 of them (35.42%) came during confinement, and at 24 months the final cohort was 118 patients (133 eyes). The previous VA of 57.99 ± 23.68 letters decreased, clinically relevant and statistically significant, by an average of 6.87 (±16.84) and 7.89 (±19.58) at 12- and 24-months follow-up. This change differs significantly from the two-year vision change observed in the national database of pretreated patients. The median number of injections and consultations is lower in our group at 12 months, compared to the pre-pandemic national database, and tends to equalize at 24 months. We did not find differences in vision when we compared patients who attended consultations during confinement or in treatment intervals greater than 8 weeks (Tq8w).
    CONCLUSIONS: The VA of patients with nAMD decreased significantly after confinement, probably due to the lower number of antiangiogenic injections and consultations during the first year, and did not recover during the second year despite the increase in the number of injections and visits close to those reported before confinement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号