Despite progress in the management of patients with retinal vascular and degenerative diseases, there is still an unmet clinical need for safe and effective therapeutic options with novel mechanisms of action. Recent mechanistic insights into the pathogenesis of retinal diseases with a prominent vascular component, such as retinal vein occlusion (RVO), diabetic retinopathy (DR) and wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD), may open up new treatment paradigms that reach beyond the inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Phosphatidylserine (PS) is a novel lipid target that is linked to the pathophysiology of several human diseases, including retinal diseases. PS acts upstream of VEGF and complement signaling pathways. Annexin A5 is a protein that targets PS and inhibits PS signaling. This review explores the current understanding of the potential roles of PS as a target and Annexin A5 as a therapeutic. The clinical development status of Annexin A5 as a therapeutic and the potential utility of PS-Annexin A5 as a theranostic pairing in retinal vascular conditions in particular is described.

The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of two intravitreal antiangiogenic drugs, ranibizumab and aflibercept, in a Mexican population over a period of 5 years, evaluating the improvement in visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) in a real-world scenario. This is a retrospective study with subjects diagnosed with diabetic retinopathy (DR), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and diabetic macular edema (DME) receiving intravitreal injections of ranibizumab and/or aflibercept. In this study, we analyzed 588 eyes of 294 patients who received intravitreal antiangiogenic injections. The results showed an improvement regardless of antiangiogenic treatment or diagnosis in both VA and CRT. We found that both aflibercept and ranibizumab improved VA, while subjects with DME responded less to antiangiogenic treatment (p < 0.05), and that this difference did not correspond to the CRT measured by OCT. These results support evidence that intravitreal antiangiogenic medications are effective for ophthalmic complications of diabetes in our population; however, damage to visual structures is not reversed in most patients. And that the perception by the patient (VA) and that of the ophthalmologist (CRT) do not completely correlate in our study.

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the primary cause of visual impairment in individuals with diabetes. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the current first-line treatment for DME owing to its effectiveness. However, frequent anti-VEGF injections may be inconvenient for patients. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether the addition of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) to anti-VEGF therapy could reduce the requirement for anti-VEGF injections while maintaining the treatment efficacy for DME. Methods: Clinical trials retrieved from the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were evaluated to determine the effectiveness of combination treatment with SML and anti-VEGF medication compared with that of anti-VEGF treatment alone. The primary outcome measures were the changes in CMT, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the total number of intravitreal injections (IVIs). Results: The IVI + SML group revealed a substantial increase in the logarithm of the minimum angle of the resolution BCVA and a reduction in CMT at the 12-month follow-up (BCVA: random-effects; mean difference [MD], -0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.10 to -0.01; p-value = 0.28, and CMT: random-effects; MD, -18.27; 95% confidence interval, -27.36 to -9.18; p-value = 0.20). The number of required IVIs in the IVI + SML group was lower than that in the IVI only group (random-effects; MD, -2.22; 95% CI: -3.13 to -1.31; p-value < 0.01). Conclusions: Combining SML therapy with anti-VEGF injections may reduce the total number of injections required, improve VA, and reduce CMT at the 12-month follow-up. Although the included studies used different SML regimens and anti-VEGF agents, this review indicates that the application of additional SML therapy results in positive clinical outcomes.

UNASSIGNED: Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) is a hemorrhagic fundus disease that can lead to permanent vision loss. Predicting the treatment response to anti-VEGF monotherapy in PCV is consistently challenging. We aimed to conduct a prospective multicenter study to explore and identify the imaging biomarkers for predicting the anti-VEGF treatment response in PCV patients, establish predictive model, and undergo multicenter validation.
UNASSIGNED: This prospective multicenter study utilized clinical characteristics and images of treatment naïve PCV patients from 15 ophthalmic centers nationwide to screen biomarkers, develop model, and validate its performance. Patients from Peking Union Medical College Hospital were randomly divided into a training set and an internal validation set. A nomogram was established by univariate, LASSO regression, and multivariate regression analysis. Patients from the other 14 centers served as an external test set. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) were utilized to evaluate the practical utility in clinical decision-making.
UNASSIGNED: The eye distribution for the training set, internal validation set, and external test set were 66, 31, and 71, respectively. The \'Good responder\' exhibited a thinner subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) (230.67 ± 61.96 vs. 314.42 ± 88.00 μm, p < 0.001), lower choroidal vascularity index (CVI) (0.31 ± 0.08 vs. 0.36 ± 0.05, p = 0.006), fewer choroidal vascular hyperpermeability (CVH) (31.0 vs. 62.2%, p = 0.012), and more intraretinal fluid (IRF) (58.6 vs. 29.7%, p = 0.018). SFCT (OR 0.990; 95% CI 0.981-0.999; p = 0.033) and CVI (OR 0.844; 95% CI 0.732-0.971; p = 0.018) were ultimately included as the optimal predictive biomarkers and presented in the form of a nomogram. The model demonstrated AUC of 0.837 (95% CI 0.738-0.936), 0.891 (95% CI 0.765-1.000), and 0.901 (95% CI 0.824-0.978) for predicting \'Good responder\' in the training set, internal validation set, and external test set, respectively, with excellent sensitivity, specificity, and practical utility.
UNASSIGNED: Thinner SFCT and lower CVI can serve as imaging biomarkers for predicting good treatment response to anti-VEGF monotherapy in PCV patients. The nomogram based on these biomarkers exhibited satisfactory performances.

UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and exploratory efficacy of tivozanib eye drops in healthy volunteers and patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
UNASSIGNED: This multicenter group-sequential dose escalation phase I study consisted of a placebo-controlled double-masked study of healthy volunteers (cohorts 1 and 2) and an open-label study of patients with nAMD (cohort 3).
UNASSIGNED: Healthy volunteers: Japanese or White men aged 20 to <50 years. Patients with nAMD with central subfield thickness (CST) ≥300 μm and best-corrected visual acuity score ≥23 letters in the study eye.
UNASSIGNED: In the single-dose cohort of healthy men (cohort 1: steps 1-5), 1 or 2 tivozanib eye drops (30 μL/drop, 5-minute interval; 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 w/v%) or placebo were administered in 1 eye once. In the multiple-dose cohort of healthy men (cohort 2: steps 1-6), 1 or 2 tivozanib eye drops (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 w/v%) or placebo were administered 3 times daily in 1 eye for 21 days. In the multiple-dose cohort of patients with nAMD (cohort 3, steps 1-3), 1 or 2 tivozanib eye drops (0.5 and 1.0 w/v%) were administered 3 times daily in 1 affected eye for 21 days.
UNASSIGNED: The safety outcome measures included adverse events (AEs). The pharmacokinetic outcome was serum tivozanib concentration. Among the exploratory efficacy outcomes, CST was evaluated.
UNASSIGNED: In total, 40, 48, and 28 participants were enrolled in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Serious AEs did not occur in cohorts 1 to 3. The most frequent AE in multiple-dose cohorts was reversible punctate keratitis: placebo arm, 8.3% (healthy men, 1/12); tivozanib arm, 47.2% (healthy men, 17/36) and 14.3% (nAMD, 4/28). Serum tivozanib exposure increased dose-dependently and was similar in healthy men and patients with nAMD. In patients with nAMD, mean CST changes from baseline to day 22 were -27.6 ± 54.88 (0.5 w/v%; 1 drop, 3 times daily), -35.6 ± 49.64 (1.0 w/v%; 1 drop, 3 times daily), and -43.7 ± 55.19 μm (1.0 w/v%; 2 drops, 3 times daily).
UNASSIGNED: Tivozanib eye drops showed a favorable safety profile in healthy Japanese and White men and Japanese patients with nAMD.
UNASSIGNED: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Background: With this study, we investigate the short-term clinical outcomes of patients affected by diabetic macular edema (DME) after switching to intravitreal Faricimab (IVF) in a real-world setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients treated for DME with IVF who showed insufficient responses to prior anti-VEGF therapy. Data collected included baseline patient demographics, medical history, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and central retinal volume (CRV). We analyzed functional and structural measures before and after IVF, compared baseline demographics and treatment factors between Faricimab-responders and reduced-responders and assessed influencing factors of the follow-up BCVA and CRT. Results: This study included 25 eyes from 16 patients. After switching to IVF, the mean BCVA showed no significant improvement, changing from 59.4 ± 13.4 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at baseline to 61.4 ± 12.8 ETDRS letters at follow-up (p = 0.26). CRT significantly reduced from 414.4 ± 126.3 µm to 353.3 ± 131.1 µm (p < 0.011), and the 3 mm CRV significantly decreased from 2.8 ± 0.5 mm3 to 2.6 ± 0.6 mm3 (p < 0.012). Seven patients met the responder criteria, exhibiting an improvement of at least 5 ETDRS letters and a simultaneous CRT reduction of at least 30 µm. Further analysis showed that higher BCVA at baseline (p < 0.001) was associated with better BCVA following IVF, while higher baseline CRT (p < 0.003), a higher number of prior anti-VEGF agents (p < 0.034) and prior corticosteroid injections (p < 0.019) were associated with greater CRT at follow-up. Conclusions: Following the initial IVF injection series, we observed a clear improvement of anatomical measures. No functional improvement was observed, although visual acuity remained stable. Higher baseline BCVA was associated with better post-IVF BCVA, while higher baseline CRT, a greater number of prior anti-VEGF agents and prior corticosteroid injections were linked to higher CRT post-IVF.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Limited data is available on treatment satisfaction with the management of wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) among patients in Italy. In this cross-sectional real-world study, treatment satisfaction with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGFs) was assessed in patients with wAMD in Italy.
UNASSIGNED: This was a non-interventional, cross-sectional survey involving patients with wAMD receiving anti-VEGFs. The survey was administered through a virtual assistant via phone. Patients\' treatment satisfaction was assessed using a newly developed Novartis Tailored Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (NVS TTSQ) and the validated Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MacTSQ).
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 154 evaluable patients were enrolled in 5 centers across Italy. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 76.8 years (7.01). Overall treatment satisfaction score assessed by NVS TTSQ was 40.50 (7.11), with a mean of 9.97 (1.84) on the information domain and 22.98 (4.57) on the unmet need domain. Patients were satisfied with diagnosis communication (4.99 [1.30]), information provided on treatment administration (4.58 [1.49], range 0-6), the waiting room (4.40 [1.43]), and management of visits and injections at the center (5.14 [1.12]), general management of maculopathy at the center (5.22 [1.01]). Patients were not satisfied with their independence in terms of disease management (2.56 [2.45]); they would like additional information about the disease (5.38 [1.03]) and to discuss the injection procedures (4.02 [1.94]) with already-treated patients. The overall treatment satisfaction score on MacTSQ scale was 55.84 (10.13).
UNASSIGNED: Patients with wAMD are satisfied with the overall management of their disease in Italy. However, patients would like to have more information on prognosis and management of the disease.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide and a severe medical and social problem. The steadily increasing number of patients is related to the aging of the population. So far, many factors affecting the development of AMD have been identified, which can be divided into non-modifiable, including genetic factors, age, and sex, and modifiable or environmental factors, such as smoking, poor diet, and hypertension. Early stages of age-related macular degeneration are characterized by fundus drusen and abnormalities in the retinal pigment epithelium. In late stages, geographic atrophy and choroidal neovascularization (CNV) are observed. The treatment of AMD, especially its advanced forms, is very challenging. Intensive research has made it possible to treat advanced stages of the dry form of AMD with pegcetacoplan and avacincaptad pegol, new drugs approved for use in the US. Pegcetacoplan targets the C3 and avacincaptad pegol targets the C5, the pivotal proteins of the complement cascade. The drugs are administered by intravitreal injection. The gold standard for neovascular AMD (nAMD) consists of intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs such as bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, brolucizumab, and faricimab. Treatment can be administered according to the fixed, pro-re-nata, and treat-and-extend regimens. The latter seems to have the best effect on improving visual acuity (VA) and the maximum therapeutic benefit. The search continues for the best ways to deliver intravitreal drugs. Current methods include sustained-release implants and hydrogel platforms for drug release, while the most promising future pathways for treating dry and nAMD are stem cell and gene therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify biomarkers that predict the response of treatment-naive idiopathic choroidal neovascularization (iCNV) to anti-VEGF treatment.
METHODS: Fourteen eyes diagnosed with iCNV underwent a dilated fundus examination, Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography (SS-OCT) and Optical Coherence Tomography - Angiography (OCT-A), and were given an anti-VEGF injection. The same examinations were repeated at every follow-up visit. Analysis of the pre- and posttreatment images was done to identify possible biomarkers which were evaluated to check association with decreased need for multiple anti-VEGF injections.
RESULTS: At presentation, 11 patients showed a compact pattern, while three patients showed an arborizing pattern on OCT angiography (P = 1). On follow-up imaging, seven patients showed a marked response, five patients showed a moderate response, and two patients showed a mild response to anti-VEGF injection. Among the seven patients showing a marked response, only one required a repeat injection (P = 0.03). On analysis of SS-OCT, a novel Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) healing response was observed in posttreatment imaging of six patients (P = 0.59).
CONCLUSIONS: A \"marked\" response to the first anti-VEGF injection results in a more sustained response and is a positive prognostic factor. RPE healing response is an interesting observation that merits further evaluation. Morphology of neovascular membranes has no effect on long-term need for multiple anti-VEGF injections.