BACKGROUND: To date, multiple cases of adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines have been reported worldwide. Alopecia areata (AA) is an uncommon type of adverse reaction reported in some articles and has a significant social and psychological impact on patients. Our study aimed to review the AA and COVID-19 vaccine literature.
METHODS: This systematic review was conducted by searching for articles on AA following COVID-19 vaccines in international databases such as Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Ovid from December 2019 to December 30, 2023. We included studies that provided data for AA patients following COVID-19 vaccination with at least one dose. Data on sex, age, country/region of origin, vaccine type, days between vaccination and symptom presentation, manifestations of AA, trichoscopy and histopathological findings, treatment, and outcomes were included.
RESULTS: In total, 579 explored studies were identified and assessed, and 25 articles with a total of 51 patients were included in the review. Twenty-seven (52.9%) patients developed new-onset AA following receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, and AA recurrence or exacerbation occurred after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine in 24 (47.1%) patients with preexisting disease. Five vaccines were reported to cause AA in all cases. The Pfizer vaccine (45.1%) was the most frequently reported, followed by the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (27.5%), Moderna mRNA-1273 (19.6%), Sinopharm (3.9%) and SinoVac (3.9%). AA occurred most frequently within one month after the 1st dose, and then, the incidence decreased gradually with time. Topical or systemic corticosteroids were used in 38 patients. Eleven patients were treated with a Janus Kinase inhibitor (jakinib) inhibitor, eight with tofacitinib, and three with an unspecified jakinib. However, 3 of the 11 patients experienced exacerbations after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: AA after COVID-19 vaccination is rare, and physicians should be aware of this phenomenon to improve early diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

Reversible axonal swelling and brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) changes were observed in standard chronic (9-month) toxicology studies in dogs treated with ritlecitinib, an oral Janus kinase 3/tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma family kinase inhibitor, at exposures higher than the approved 50-mg human dose. To evaluate the clinical relevance of the dog toxicity finding, this phase 2a, double-blind study assessed BAEP changes and intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) histology in adults with alopecia areata treated with ritlecitinib. Patients were randomized to receive oral ritlecitinib 50 mg once daily (QD) with a 4-week loading dose of 200 mg QD or placebo for 9 months (placebo-controlled phase); they then entered the active-therapy extension and received ritlecitinib 50 mg QD (with a 4-week loading dose of 200 mg in patients switching from placebo). Among the 71 patients, no notable mean differences in change from baseline (CFB) in Waves I-V interwave latency (primary outcome) or Wave V amplitude on BAEP at a stimulus intensity of 80 dB nHL were observed in the ritlecitinib or placebo group at Month 9, with no notable differences in interwave latency or Wave V amplitude between groups. The CFB in mean or median IENF density and in percentage of IENFs with axonal swellings was minimal and similar between groups at Month 9. Ritlecitinib treatment was also not associated with an imbalanced incidence of neurological and audiological adverse events. These results provide evidence that the BAEP and axonal swelling finding in dogs are not clinically relevant in humans.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune pathology manifested by loss of hair.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and azathioprine in patients with AA and variants.
METHODS: In this double-blind randomized controlled trail (RCT) carried out at the Department of Dermatology, Medical Teaching Institute-Lady Reading Hospital (MTI-LRH), Peshawar, Pakistan, patients aged ≥ 12 years diagnosed with AA, alopecia totalis (AT) or alopecia universalis (AU) with minimum 50% scalp hair loss for a period ≥ 06 years were included. Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (Group I) or oral azathioprine 2 mg/kg body weight once daily (Group II). The primary endpoint was Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score, evaluated at baseline and 06 months follow-up. Safety was consistently assessed during the study.
RESULTS: A total of 104 patients underwent random allocation into either the tofacitinib group (n = 52) or the azathioprine group (n = 52). The mean (SD) age of patients was 20.23 (7.14) years and 22.26 (8.07) years, while the mean (SD) disease duration was 6.59 (4.01) years and 7.98 (4.40) years in in Group I and II, respectively. Overall, 40 (38.5%) patients were adolescents while 70 (67.3%) were male. 52 (50%) had AA, 37 (35.5%) had AT and 15 (14.5%) had AU. Mean baseline SALT score in tofacitinib group was 91.02 ± 10.21 and azathioprine group was 91.02 ± 10.63, which at 06 months follow-up improved to 14.1 ± 24.6 and 63.9 ± 33.9, respectively (difference, 11.5 points; 95% confidence interval, 38.3-61.3, p < 0.0001). Overall, no major adverse effects and no difference among the minor adverse effects in the two groups (04 adverse events for tofacitinib group and 08 for azathioprine group: p = 0.23) was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of tofacitinib was significantly higher than azathioprine, whilst both drugs were well-tolerated in patients with AA and variants.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with asthma experience alopecia areata (AA) in their lives. However, it is unclear whether asthma causes or results from AA. Our objective was to investigate the genetic causal relationship between asthma and AA.
METHODS: Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was used to assess the causal relationship between asthma and AA based on the largest publicly available genome-wide association study summary statistics. Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) and cicatricial alopecia (CA) were chosen as the control groups for AA. The main estimates were obtained using inverse variance weighting meta-analysis (IVW), Mendelian randomization-Egger (MR-Egger), maximum likelihood estimation, and the weighted median. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using Cochran\'s Q test, MR-Egger, and leave-one-out methods. Lastly, we conducted a reverse MR analysis to evaluate the possibility of reverse causation.
RESULTS: Genetically, asthma is associated with an increased risk of AA, while the association between genetically predicted AGA or CA and asthma was negative. The risk of AA increased by 1.86 times in patients with asthma under the IVW method (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.31-2.629, p < 0.001). The reverse MR analysis did not find evidence supporting reverse causality from three phenotypes of alopecia to asthma. Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent causal estimates.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that asthma is causally associated with AA. The findings deepen our understanding of the role of asthma in the pathology of AA, which emphasizes the potential for opening a new vista for the prevention and diagnosis of AA.

Our study aims to synthesize existing evidence of dupilumab for alopecia areata (AA) in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). We searched MEDLINE and Embase on March 1, 2024, using keywords related to AD, AA, dupilumab, and pediatric patient populations per PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A mean SALT score reduction of 42.6 following dupilumab treatment (p < .01) over an average of 3.21 months, and a mean reduction of Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) levels of 2.14 units (p < .01) demonstrates the efficacy of dupilumab in pediatric AA when there is concurrent AD. Our findings in combination with dupilumab\'s favorable safety profile in pediatric AD makes it an appealing option for AA treatment, however, a greater understanding of the underlying mechanisms, optimal pediatric patient selection criteria, long-term efficacy, and safety profile of dupilumab in this context is warranted.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease that targets neuromuscular junctions. While immunotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment, the effects of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors on MG remain underexplored. In this report, we describe the case of a 58-year-old woman with ocular myasthenia gravis who received treatment with the JAK inhibitor, baricitinib for alopecia areata. The patient presented with left eyelid ptosis and an inadequate response to steroids and pyridostigmine, along with symptoms of alopecia areata. Following diagnosis, we initiated a treatment regimen consisting of baricitinib for six months. After initiation of baricitinib, we observed a complete resolution of the patient\'s MG symptoms, accompanied by hair regrowth, even when steroids were tapered and pyridostigmine was discontinued. Furthermore, the titer of the anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody was decreased. This report represents the first reported case of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive MG that was successfully treated through the inhibition of JAK activity.

BACKGROUND: Limited epidemiologic data has suggested direct associations between hair pigment, race, and incidence of alopecia areata (AA). Here, we examine the relationship between natural hair color, race, and the lifetime risk alopecia.
METHODS: In this case-control study, we included UK Biobank patients of all races and self-reported hair color with diagnoses of AA, androgenetic alopecia (AGA), or scarring alopecia (SA). Multivariable logistic regression was used to detect differences in lifetime risk.
RESULTS: Findings reveal a significantly increased risk of AA among individuals with black hair compared to dark brown hair (OR 1.71 [95% CI 1.22-2.38], p < 0.001). Those with red or blonde hair showed a decreased risk of AA (0.74 [0.56-0.97]; 0.62 [0.41-0.95], p < 0.05). No racial differences in AA prevalence were observed among individuals with black hair.
CONCLUSIONS: Darker hair colors may be associated with a higher risk of AA, lighter hair colors with a lower risk, and differences in hair color could contribute to previously noted racial variations in AA incidence, potentially influencing dermatologists\' perspectives on the disease\'s epidemiology.

BACKGROUND: An extensive body of literature has been published regarding alopecia areata (AA) in the past 50 years. The current paper used a bibliometric analysis (BA) to identify high-quality research articles using criteria such as annual citations (ACs) and journal impact factor.
OBJECTIVE: To identify and analyze the top 100 most cited articles in AA scientific literature over the past 50 years using BA methods.
METHODS: Web of Science (webOS) citation indexing database was used, on April 4th, 2023, to identify the most cited articles on AA. Articles were ranked by their ACs. Data sets were then subdivided into corresponding and senior authors, year of publication, journal and impact factor, total citations according to webOS database, ACs, affiliation, country of origin, manuscript type, design, focus, and usage count since 2013.
RESULTS: The extracted articles were published between 1975-2019. Mean total citations ranged between 67 and 578. The most cited paper was: \"Tofacitinib for the treatment of severe alopecia areata and variants: A study of 90 patients\" by Liu et al. with an AC of 26.5. Most publications were published between 1990 and 1999 (n=28). The Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology was the most published journal (25 articles). The research focus of original papers was treatment (36%), epidemiology (22%), pathogenesis (20%), basic science (16%), and diagnosis (6%).
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis is the first to provide detailed bibliometric characteristics, highlighting the worldwide burden and research trends in.

The management of alopecia areata (AA) in pediatric patients poses unique challenges, particularly regarding treatment discussions and decision making involving both patients and their families. This commentary presents findings from unpublished research on treatment-discontinuation discussions between AA patients and their treating providers, shedding light on the hopes, expectations, and disappointments of individuals with severe AA. The study explored patient and guardian satisfaction with these discussions, emphasizing the importance of addressing psychosocial concerns, facilitating contact with support groups, and demonstrating empathy. The role of dermatologists in conversations about treatment, prognosis, and quality of life is examined, emphasizing the need for honesty, empathy, and realistic expectations. The authors propose a patient-centered approach to initiating and guiding discussions, focusing on understanding the impact of AA on patients and their families and collaboratively deciding on treatment options. The mantra: \'I need to understand how this is affecting all of you, so we can decide together what to do next\' is central to this proposed approach. Special considerations for different scenarios are discussed, highlighting the importance of individualized care and effective communication. Overall, the commentary emphasizes the significance of actively listening, acknowledging emotions, and prioritizing patient and family goals to optimize care for pediatric AA patients.

暂无摘要。