Acute cholecystitis

急性胆囊炎
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:严格的安全性(CVS)对于确保安全的腹腔镜胆囊切除术很重要。当CVS是不可能的,进行胆囊次全切除术.在考虑胆囊次全切除术时,外科医生通常关心的是防止胆囊管的胆漏。急性胆囊炎的胆囊次全切除术的两种主要类型是开窗和重建。以前,这两个没有选择标准;因此,进行开放转换。这项研究旨在评估我们以目标为导向的方法,以选择开窗或重建急性胆囊炎的胆囊次全切除术。
    方法:我们在2019年4月推出了面向目标的方法。在介绍这种方法之前,急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术无胆囊次全切除术标准。我们的方法引入后,根据大部胆囊切除术标准对急性胆囊炎进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。我们回顾性回顾了2015年至2021年间因急性胆囊炎而接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者的病历。腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎由外科医生进行,无论他们是新手还是退伍军人。
    结果:从2015年4月到2019年3月的时期是在我们的方法引入(BI)之前,从2019年4月到2021年12月的时期是在我们的方法引入(AI)之后。在BI和AI期间有177和186例急性胆囊炎患者,分别。两组在术前特征方面无显著差异,手术时间,和失血。组间腹腔镜胆囊次全切除率无差异(10.2%[BI]vs.[AI]13.9%;p=0.266)。BI期间的开放转化率明显高于AI期间(7.4%vs.1.6%;p=0.015)。
    结论:我们的目标导向方法是可行的,安全,许多外科医生容易理解。
    BACKGROUND: A critical view of safety (CVS) is important to ensure safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. When the CVS is not possible, subtotal cholecystectomy is performed. While considering subtotal cholecystectomy, surgeons are often concerned about preventing bile leakage from the cystic ducts. The two main types of subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis are fenestrating and reconstituting. Previously, there were no selection criteria for these two; therefore, open conversion was performed. This study aimed to evaluate our goal-oriented approach to choose fenestrating or reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.
    METHODS: We introduced our goal-oriented approach in April 2019. Before introducing this approach, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was performed without criteria for subtotal cholecystectomy. After our approach was introduced, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was performed according to the subtotal cholecystectomy criteria. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between 2015 and 2021. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was performed by surgeons regardless of whether they were novices or veterans.
    RESULTS: The period from April 2015 to March 2019 was before the introduction (BI) of our approach, the period from April 2019 to December 2021 was after the introduction (AI) of our approach. There were 177 and 186 patients with acute cholecystitis during the BI and AI periods, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of preoperative characteristics, operative time, and blood loss. No difference in the laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy rate between groups (10.2% [BI] vs. 13.9% [AI]; p = 0.266) was obserbed. The open conversion rate during the BI period was significantly higher than that during the AI period (7.4% vs. 1.6%; p = 0.015).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our goal-oriented approach is feasible, safe, and easy for many surgeons to understand.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:急性胆囊炎(AC)患者表现为不利的全身或局部条件,通常采用经皮胆囊造口术(PC)作为临时措施。PC后间歇胆囊切除术的临床结果尚不清楚。该研究的目的是确定AC的PC后胆囊切除术的时机与间歇胆囊切除术的围手术期并发症发生率之间的关系。我们假设胆囊切除术的特定时间间隔与不良事件的风险较低相关。
    方法:这是一项回顾性(2018-2020年)多中心研究,在8家参与医院系统的成年AC患者中进行,用PC和间歇胆囊切除术管理。人口统计,合并症,治疗细节,并对结果进行了检查。根据PC后手术时机的四分位数对患者进行分组(<7、7-9、10-13、>13周)。主要结果是胆管损伤的复合终点,再操作,重新接纳,图像引导干预,内镜干预,转换为开放手术,或死亡。
    结果:188例患者的年龄中位数为66岁,AC为轻度(41%),中等(47%),严重(12%)。从PC到手术的中位天数为65天(Q1=48,Q3=91)。腹腔镜胆囊切除术(89.9%)是最常见的计划方法(机器人6.4%,3.7%开放)和28(14.9%)转化为开放。51例患者报告了复合终点(27.1%)。7例(3.7%)患者发生胆道损伤。手术时间和术中引流管放置与复合结局独立相关。PC后7周内的胆囊切除术与复合终点的风险降低相关(OR=0.36,95%CI0.13-0.97),与PC后>13周接受手术的患者相比。
    结论:PC后手术时机与手术结果相关。在7周之前接受手术的患者的发病率明显低于延迟胆囊切除术的患者。在PC后的患者选择和管理中应考虑这些结果。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) presenting with unfavorable systemic or local conditions are often managed with percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) as a temporary measure. The clinical outcomes of interval cholecystectomy following PC remain unclear. The aim of the study was to identify the association between the timing of cholecystectomy following PC for AC and perioperative complication rates at interval cholecystectomy. We hypothesized that there would be a specific time interval to cholecystectomy associated with lower risk for adverse events.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective (2018-2020) multicenter study at 8 participating hospital systems of adult patients with AC, managed with PC and interval cholecystectomy. Demographics, comorbidities, treatment details, and outcomes were examined. Patients were grouped based on quartiles for timing of surgery after PC (< 7, 7-9, 10-13, > 13 weeks). The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of bile duct injury, reoperation, readmission, image-guided intervention, endoscopic intervention, conversion to open surgery, or death.
    RESULTS: There were 188 patients with a median age of 66 years with AC classified as mild (41%), moderate (47%), and severe (12%). Median days from PC to surgery were 65 (Q1 = 48, Q3 = 91). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (89.9%) was the most commonly planned approach (robotic 6.4%, 3.7% open) and 28 (14.9%) were converted to open. The composite endpoint was reported in 51 patients (27.1%). A biliary injury occurred in 7 (3.7%) patients. Time to surgery and intraoperative drain placement were independently associated with the composite outcome. Cholecystectomy within 7 weeks of PC was associated with decreased risk (OR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.13-0.97) of the composite endpoint, compared to patients undergoing surgery > 13 weeks after PC.
    CONCLUSIONS: Timing of surgery following PC was associated with procedural outcomes. Patients undergoing surgery before 7 weeks experienced significantly less morbidity than patients having delayed cholecystectomy. These results should be considered in patient selection and management after PC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:紧急胆囊切除术是治疗急性胆囊炎(AC)的主要手段。在实际的实践中,围手术期预防性抗生素用于预防术后感染并发症(PIC),但其有效性缺乏证据.我们的目的是探讨预防性抗生素在急诊胆囊切除术中的疗效。
    方法:我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,科克伦中部,WebofScience(WOS),和Scopus至2023年6月14日。我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),该试验涉及根据东京指南诊断为轻度至中度AC的患者,这些患者正在接受紧急胆囊切除术,并在术前和/或术后给予抗生素作为干预组,并与安慰剂组进行比较。对于二分数据,我们应用了风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI),而对于连续数据,我们使用均差(MD)和95%CI。
    结果:我们纳入了7个RCTs,包含1747例患者的总体样本量。我们的分析显示总PIC没有显著差异(RR=0.84,95%CI(0.63,1.12),P=0.23),手术部位感染(RR=0.79,95%CI(0.56,1.12),P=0.19),远处感染(RR=1.01,95%CI(0.55,1.88),P=0.97),非感染性并发症(RR=0.84,95%CI(0.64,1.11),P=0.22),死亡率(RR=0.34,95%CI(0.04,3.23),P=0.35),和再入院(RR=0.69,95%CI(0.43,1.11),P=0.13)。
    结论:轻中度急性胆囊炎患者围手术期使用抗生素对急诊胆囊切除术后术后感染并发症没有明显的减少。(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023438755)。
    BACKGROUND: Emergency cholecystectomy is the mainstay in treating acute cholecystitis (AC). In actual practice, perioperative prophylactic antibiotics are used to prevent postoperative infectious complications (PIC), but their effectiveness lacks evidence. We aim to investigate the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in emergency cholecystectomy.
    METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus up to June 14, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved patients diagnosed with mild to moderate AC according to Tokyo guidelines who were undergoing emergency cholecystectomy and were administered preoperative and/or postoperative antibiotics as an intervention group and compared to a placebo group. For dichotomous data, we applied the risk ratio (RR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI), while for continuous data, we used the mean difference (MD) and 95% CI.
    RESULTS: We included seven RCTs encompassing a collective sample size of 1747 patients. Our analysis showed no significant differences regarding total PIC (RR = 0.84 with 95% CI (0.63, 1.12), P = 0.23), surgical site infection (RR = 0.79 with 95% CI (0.56, 1.12), P = 0.19), distant infections (RR = 1.01 with 95% CI (0.55, 1.88), P = 0.97), non-infectious complications (RR = 0.84 with 95% CI (0.64, 1.11), P = 0.22), mortality (RR = 0.34 with 95% CI (0.04, 3.23), P = 0.35), and readmission (RR = 0.69 with 95% CI (0.43, 1.11), P = 0.13).
    CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative antibiotics in patients with mild to moderate acute cholecystitis did not show a significant reduction of postoperative infectious complications after emergency cholecystectomy. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023438755).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:胆道错构瘤是罕见的先天性胆管发育异常,是偶然发现的。它们通常表现为肝脏表面的多个病变,类似于转移性病变。我们报告了一例急性结石性胆囊炎,最终被诊断为无症状的多发性胆道错构瘤。
    方法:一名42岁男性,无合并症,表现为发热和呕吐相关的上腹部疼痛。腹部对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)显示急性结石性胆囊炎,肝肿大伴肝脏脂肪变化。在腹腔镜检查中,发现肝脏在两个叶的表面上散布着直径约0.5cm的灰白色结节状病变。其中一个病变与胆囊切除术一起进行了活检。
    结论:通常称为“vonMeyenburg复合物”的胆道错构瘤是在肝脏中发现的罕见病变,通常无症状。在这种情况下,患者表现出急性胆囊炎的症状,但肝脏病变的活检报告被证明是良性胆道错构瘤,在最初的印象中看起来像是多个肝脏次级。
    结论:我们描述了一个成人多发性胆道错构瘤的病例,这是一个偶然发现。胆道错构瘤是一种罕见的实体,有时可以模仿肝脏中的转移。因此,在计划任何进一步治疗之前,组织病理学确认至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Biliary hamartomas are rare congenital development anomaly of bile ducts, which are detected incidentally. They often present as multiple lesions on liver surface which resembles metastatic lesions. We report a case of acute calculous cholecystitis ultimately diagnosed to have asymptomatic multiple biliary hamartomas.
    METHODS: A 42-year-old male with no co-morbidities presented with pain in upper abdomen associated with fever and vomiting. Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of abdomen showed acute calculous cholecystitis, hepatomegaly with fatty changes in liver. On laparoscopy the liver was found to have grey-white nodular lesions of about 0.5 cm in diameter scattered on the surface of both the lobes. One of the lesion was biopsied along with cholecystectomy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Biliary hamartoma commonly referred to as \"von Meyenburg complexes\" are uncommon lesions found in the liver which are usually asymptomatic. In this case the patient presented with symptoms of acute cholecystitis but the biopsy report from liver lesions proved to be benign biliary hamartoma which on initial impression looked like multiple liver secondaries.
    CONCLUSIONS: We have described a case of an adult with multiple biliary hamartoma which was an incidental finding. Biliary hamartoma is a rare entity which can sometime mimic metastasis in the liver. Thus, histopathological confirmation is essential before planning any further treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    由于急性胆囊炎和消化性溃疡等并发症的临床特征重叠,大量饮酒和吸烟史患者的腹痛提出了诊断挑战。对醉酒患者进行不可靠的身体检查通常会使准确的诊断复杂化。我们介绍了一个56岁的男性,有酗酒和吸烟史,出现非特异性腹痛的患者到急诊科就诊。初始成像提示胆囊炎,但由于病人中毒,他的身体检查不可靠。在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,意外发现了一个穿孔的幽门前溃疡,由胆囊密封。这种情况突出了仅依靠影像学来诊断醉酒患者的腹部状况的局限性。术中发现穿孔性溃疡需要改变手术方法,强调有重大生活方式风险的患者需要灵活的手术计划,并高度怀疑其他腹部病变。通过自适应的手术技术和全面的术后护理,成功地管理了该患者,包括根除幽门螺杆菌的治疗,强调了保持广泛的鉴别诊断和准备适应手术计划的重要性.这种方法对于有效管理复杂案件至关重要,确保解决直接的手术问题和根本原因,以优化恢复并防止复发。
    Abdominal pain in patients with significant alcohol use and smoking history presents diagnostic challenges due to overlapping clinical features of complications like acute cholecystitis and peptic ulcers. The unreliable physical examinations of intoxicated patients often complicate accurate diagnosis. We present a case of a 56-year-old male with a history of alcoholism and smoking, who presented to the emergency department with nonspecific abdominal pain. Initial imaging suggested cholecystitis, but due to the patient\'s intoxication, his physical examination was unreliable. During a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a perforated prepyloric ulcer was unexpectedly discovered, sealed by the gallbladder. This case highlights the limitations of relying solely on imaging for diagnosing abdominal conditions in intoxicated patients. The intraoperative discovery of the perforated ulcer necessitated a shift in the surgical approach, emphasizing the need for flexibility in surgical planning and a high index of suspicion for other abdominal pathologies in patients with significant lifestyle risks. The successful management of this patient through adaptive surgical techniques and comprehensive postoperative care, including Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, underscores the importance of maintaining a broad differential diagnosis and readiness to adapt surgical plans. This approach is essential for managing complex cases effectively, ensuring that both the immediate surgical issues and underlying causes are addressed to optimize recovery and prevent recurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    小肠憩室病不是常见的疾病实体;然而,它越来越多地被诊断出来,并与各种胃肠道疾病有关。虽然罕见,可能发生并发症,有时可能需要手术或内窥镜介入治疗.此外,由于各种体征和症状,怀疑和诊断十二指肠憩室病(DD)可能具有挑战性。我们目前的大部分知识来自病例报告和系列报告。本报告旨在记录一例DD,表现为严重的右上腹疼痛,模仿急性胆囊炎的体征和症状。它还回顾和总结了有关DD临床表现的现有文献,它的诊断方法,治疗方式,以及ED中可能遇到的并发症。
    Small bowel diverticulosis is not a common disease entity; however, it is increasingly diagnosed and linked to various gastrointestinal complaints. Although rare, complications can occur and may sometimes require surgical or endoscopic intervention. Furthermore, suspecting and diagnosing duodenal diverticulosis (DD) can be challenging due to the variety of presenting signs and symptoms. Much of our current knowledge comes from case reports and series. This report aims to document a case of DD presenting with severe right upper quadrant pain mimicking the signs and symptoms of acute cholecystitis. It also reviews and summarizes the available literature on the clinical manifestations of DD, its diagnostic approach, treatment modalities, and possible complications encountered in the ED.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    钩端螺旋体病是一种在全球范围内分布的细菌,属于可以影响人类和动物的人畜共患病组。大多数钩端螺旋体病病例表现为轻度,黄疸感染。然而,一小部分病例发展为Weil's病,以出血和胆红素和肝酶水平升高为特征。它还可以引起胆囊的炎症。急性非结石性胆囊炎在一小部分病例中被描述为钩端螺旋体病的表现;然而,在文献中没有发现钩端螺旋体病和急性非结石性胆囊炎之间的关联。
    在本报告中,我们描述了一个66岁的病人,他到急诊科就诊,临床表现以发热为主,改变的一般状况,右侧软骨下腹疼痛,恶心,反复呕吐。急性结石性胆囊炎根据临床诊断,实验室,和成像发现。术前准备期间,患者表现为肝和肾功能衰竭的体征,并伴有严重的凝血障碍。进行腹部超声和计算机断层扫描后,排除了阻塞性黄疸。于是人们开始怀疑钩端螺旋体病,并开始对感染进行适当的治疗。急性胆囊炎症状缓解,病人有一个良好的结果。手术被推迟,直到感染得到完全治疗,六周后对患者的病情进行了重新评估。
    钩端螺旋体病的出血性形式,韦尔病,可以模拟急性胆囊炎,包括胆结石的形式。因此,为了确保准确的诊断,如果患者有危险因素,应怀疑钩端螺旋体病。然而,治疗的顺序没有严格确定,将取决于临床情况和患者的预后。
    UNASSIGNED: Leptospirosis is a bacterium with a worldwide distribution and belongs to the group of zoonoses that can affect both humans and animals. Most cases of leptospirosis present as a mild, anicteric infection. However, a small percentage of cases develop Weil\'s disease, characterized by bleeding and elevated levels of bilirubin and liver enzymes. It can also cause inflammation of the gallbladder. Acute acalculous cholecystitis has been described as a manifestation of leptospirosis in a small percentage of cases; however, no association between leptospirosis and acute acalculous cholecystitis has been found in the literature.
    UNASSIGNED: In this report, we describe the case of a 66-year-old patient who presented to the emergency department with a clinical picture dominated by fever, an altered general condition, abdominal pain in the right hypochondrium, nausea, and repeated vomiting. Acute calculous cholecystitis was diagnosed based on clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings. During preoperative preparation, the patient exhibited signs of liver and renal failure with severe coagulation disorders. Obstructive jaundice was excluded after performing an abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography scan. The suspicion of leptospirosis was then raised, and appropriate treatment for the infection was initiated. The acute cholecystitis symptoms went into remission, and the patient had a favorable outcome. Surgery was postponed until the infection was treated entirely, and a re-evaluation of the patient\'s condition was conducted six-week later.
    UNASSIGNED: The icterohemorrhagic form of leptospirosis, Weil\'s disease, can mimic acute cholecystitis, including the form with gallstones. Therefore, to ensure an accurate diagnosis, leptospirosis should be suspected if the patient has risk factors. However, the order of treatments is not strictly established and will depend on the clinical picture and the patient\'s prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性胆囊炎是最常见的外科疾病之一。可能会从轻度进展到重度。当合并菌血症时,急性胆囊炎的死亡率高达10-20%。急性胆囊炎患者的护理标准是早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术。经皮胆囊造口术或内镜手术是选择性病例的替代疗法。然而,抗生素治疗在预防手术并发症和限制全身炎症反应方面发挥着关键作用,尤其是中度至重度胆囊炎患者。急性胆囊炎患者的胆汁细菌定植率为35-60%。最常见的微生物是大肠杆菌,克雷伯菌属。,链球菌属。,肠球菌属。,和梭菌属。早期经验性抗菌治疗以及感染源控制是成功治疗的基石。在这些情况下,抗生素的选择必须考虑一些因素(例如,临床表现的严重程度,如果在医院或社区获得感染的发作,药物渗入胆汁,和任何抗药性)。此外,在严重胆囊炎的情况下,必须根据胆汁培养物修改治疗方法。抗生素管理是正确处理胆汁相关感染的关键。有必要了解适当的治疗方案及其确切的持续时间。适当使用抗生素至关重要,应将其纳入良好的临床实践和护理标准。
    Acute cholecystitis is one of the most common surgical diseases, which may progress from mild to severe cases. When combined with bacteremia, the mortality rate of acute cholecystitis reaches up to 10-20%. The standard of care in patients with acute cholecystitis is early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Percutaneous cholecystostomy or endoscopic procedures are alternative treatments in selective cases. Nevertheless, antibiotic therapy plays a key role in preventing surgical complications and limiting the systemic inflammatory response, especially in patients with moderate to severe cholecystitis. Patients with acute cholecystitis have a bile bacterial colonization rate of 35-60%. The most frequently isolated microorganisms are Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., and Clostridium spp. Early empirical antimicrobial therapy along with source control of infection is the cornerstone for a successful treatment. In these cases, the choice of antibiotic must be made considering some factors (e.g., the severity of the clinical manifestations, the onset of the infection if acquired in hospital or in the community, the penetration of the drug into the bile, and any drug resistance). Furthermore, therapy must be modified based on bile cultures in cases of severe cholecystitis. Antibiotic stewardship is the key to the correct management of bile-related infections. It is necessary to be aware of the appropriate therapeutic scheme and its precise duration. The appropriate use of antibiotic agents is crucial and should be integrated into good clinical practice and standards of care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:急性胆囊炎常见于老年人。根据目前针对每个案件特点的具体建议,这些患者通常在药物治疗后接受延迟胆囊切除术治疗.我们的研究旨在比较该策略在75岁以上和以下患者中的成功率。
    方法:这是一项回顾性的单中心分析性观察研究,纳入了2021年至2022年期间因急性胆囊炎住院的患者,这些患者在老年手术后病房(UPOG)和胃肠外科病房住院。主要终点为延期胆囊切除术的失败率。次要终点包括:尊重建议的手术延迟,住院期间患者功能独立性的丧失,以及手术弃权的原因。
    结果:总计,纳入290例患者。延迟择期胆囊切除术的策略未在31(44%)75岁或以上的患者中实现。8例(18%)年龄小于75岁的患者(P=0.005)。主要原因是决定在治疗后不手术。在这两组中,建议的手术间隔时间得到公平尊重,住院期间的自主性丧失较小.超过三分之一的择期手术的老年患者最终拒绝接受手术。
    结论:对于患有急性胆囊炎的老年人,常规择期胆囊切除术的策略不应严格;该手术的指征应考虑患者的意愿和生理状态。
    BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis occurs frequently in the elderly. According to the current recommendations specific to the characteristics of each case, these patients are most often treated by delayed cholecystectomy after medical treatment. Our study aimed to compare the success rate of this strategy in patients over and under 75years of age.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center analytic observational study that included patients who were hospitalized for acute cholecystitis in a geriatric postoperative unit (unité postopératoire gériatrique [UPOG]) and gastrointestinal surgery unit between 2021 and 2022. The main endpoint was the failure rate of deferred cholecystectomy. Secondary endpoints included: respect for the recommended operative delay, loss of the patient\'s functional independence during hospitalization, and the reason for surgical abstention.
    RESULTS: In total, 290 patients were included. The strategy of delayed elective cholecystectomy was not achieved in 31 (44%) patients 75years old or older vs. eight (18%) patients younger than 75years old (P=0.005). The main reason was the decision not to operate after medical treatment. In both groups, the recommended operative interval was equitably respected and the loss of autonomy during hospitalization was minor. More than one-third of the elderly patients scheduled for elective surgery finally refused to undergo surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of routine elective cholecystectomy should not be strict in the elderly with acute cholecystitis; the indication for this procedure should take into account the wishes as well as the physiological status of the patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于肥胖和快速体重减轻,在减肥手术患者中更常见胆道并发症,例如胆石症和胆总管结石。体重指数>40的患者面临八倍的胆石症风险。减肥手术后,尤其是在腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)后,30%的患者由于体重迅速下降而发展为胆道疾病。这篇综述的目的是分析减肥手术后发生的主要胆道并发症及其处理。文献综述主要从2010年到2023年,关于SciELO中与肥胖患者相关的胆道并发症,PubMed,和MEDLINE。与接受腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的患者相比,接受LRYGB的患者术后有症状结石的发生率更高(14.5%)。术后6至12个月内的主要胆道并发症包括:胆石症:36%;胆汁绞痛/运动障碍:3.86%;急性胆囊炎:0.98%-18.1%;慢性胆囊炎:70.2%;胆石症:0.2%-5.7%和胰腺炎:0.46%-9.4%。外科医生需要意识到这些并发症,并根据患者症状考虑手术治疗,以提高他们的生活质量。
    Biliary complications like cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis are more common in bariatric surgery patients due to obesity and rapid weight loss. Patients with a body mass index > 40 face an eightfold risk of developing cholelithiasis. Post-bariatric surgery, especially after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), 30% of patients develop biliary disease due to rapid weight loss. The aim of this review is to analyze the main biliary complications that occur after bariatric surgery and its management. A review of the literature was conducted mainly from 2010 up to 2023 with regard to biliary complications associated with bariatric patients in SciELO, PubMed, and MEDLINE. Patients undergoing LRYGB have a higher incidence (14.5%) of symptomatic calculi post-surgery compared to those undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at 4.1%. Key biliary complications within 6 to 12 months post-surgery include: Cholelithiasis: 36%; Biliary colic/dyskinesia: 3.86%; Acute cholecystitis: 0.98%-18.1%; Chronic cholecystitis: 70.2%; Choledocholithiasis: 0.2%-5.7% and Pancreatitis: 0.46%-9.4%. Surgeons need to be aware of these complications and consider surgical treatments based on patient symptoms to enhance their quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号